Wind conditions based on coupling between a mesoscale and microscale model

Similar documents
Estimation of turbulence intensity and shear factor for diurnal and nocturnal periods with an URANS flow solver coupled with WRF

A Comparative Study of virtual and operational met mast data

Validation of Boundary Layer Winds from WRF Mesoscale Forecasts over Denmark

Modeling Study of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Characteristics in Industrial City by the Example of Chelyabinsk

Development and Validation of Polar WRF

Air Quality Screening Modeling

Water Balance in the Murray-Darling Basin and the recent drought as modelled with WRF

MPAS Atmospheric Boundary Layer Simulation under Selected Stability Conditions: Evaluation using the SWIFT dataset

COSMIC GPS Radio Occultation and

Comparison of a Mesoscale Model with FINO Measurements in the German Bight and the Baltic Sea

Regional Climate Simulations with WRF Model

Forecasting the Diabatic Offshore Wind Profile at FINO1 with the WRF Mesoscale Model

Simulating the Vertical Structure of the Wind with the WRF Model

Numerical Modelling for Optimization of Wind Farm Turbine Performance

Testing and Improving Pacific NW PBL forecasts

Solar irradiance modelling over Belgium using WRF-ARW :

D.Carvalho, A, Rocha, at 2014 Applied Energy. Report person:zhang Jiarong. Date:

Simulation studies for Lake Taihu effect on local meteorological environment. Ren Xia

Numerical Weather Prediction: Data assimilation. Steven Cavallo

P1.2 SENSITIVITY OF WRF MODEL FORECASTS TO DIFFERENT PHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATIONS IN THE BEAUFORT SEA REGION

ANNUAL WRF SIMULATIONS FOR THE UTAH BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT S AIR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (ARMS) AIR QUALITY MODELING

Evaluating winds and vertical wind shear from Weather Research and Forecasting model forecasts using seven planetary boundary layer schemes

Assessment of the Noah LSM with Multi-parameterization Options (Noah-MP) within WRF

VALIDATION OF BOUNDARY-LAYER WINDS FROM WRF MESOSCALE FORECASTS WITH APPLICATIONS TO WIND ENERGY FORECASTING

P Hurricane Danielle Tropical Cyclogenesis Forecasting Study Using the NCAR Advanced Research WRF Model

Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Energy Resource Group, DIT

Accuracy comparison of mesoscale model simulated offshore wind speeds between Japanese and German coastal waters

PERFORMANCE OF THE WRF-ARW IN THE COMPLEX TERRAIN OF SALT LAKE CITY

Research Article WRF Model Methodology for Offshore Wind Energy Applications

Investigating low-level jet wind profiles using two different lidars

Nesting large-eddy simulations within mesoscale simulations in WRF for wind energy applications

Sensitivity of precipitation forecasts to cumulus parameterizations in Catalonia (NE Spain)

Logistics. Goof up P? R? Can you log in? Requests for: Teragrid yes? NCSA no? Anders Colberg Syrowski Curtis Rastogi Yang Chiu

AMPS Update June 2016

Creating Meteorology for CMAQ

Jordan G. Powers Kevin W. Manning. Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO

ABSTRACT 2 DATA 1 INTRODUCTION

Linking mesocale modelling to site conditions

90 s. MS-Micro. Primitives NOABL. high. low. CPU / Information/ Global Market

Characteristics of the night and day time atmospheric boundary layer at Dome C, Antarctica

Development and Testing of Polar WRF *

A New Ocean Mixed-Layer Model Coupled into WRF

The Fifth-Generation NCAR / Penn State Mesoscale Model (MM5) Mark Decker Feiqin Xie ATMO 595E November 23, 2004 Department of Atmospheric Science

Descripiton of method used for wind estimates in StormGeo

[1]{CNR- Institute for Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Bologna, Italy}

INFLUENCE OF SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE ON COASTAL URBAN AREA - CASE STUDY IN OSAKA BAY, JAPAN -

Wind Power Forecasting Using Non-Linear ARMAX Models and Neural Networks

VERIFICATION OF HIGH-RESOLUTION MESOSCALE SIMULATIONS USING LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE FIELDS DERIVED FROM SATELLITES

Application of the Ems-Wrf Model in Dekadal Rainfall Prediction over the Gha Region Franklin J. Opijah 1, Joseph N. Mutemi 1, Laban A.

Air Force Weather Ensembles

Evaluation of High-Resolution WRF Model Simulations of Surface Wind over the West Coast of India

ABSTRACT 3 RADIAL VELOCITY ASSIMILATION IN BJRUC 3.1 ASSIMILATION STRATEGY OF RADIAL

Improved Atmospheric Stable Boundary Layer Formulations for Navy Seasonal Forecasting

An analysis of Wintertime Cold-Air Pool in Armenia Using Climatological Observations and WRF Model Data

Comprehensive Analysis of Annual 2005/2008 Simulation of WRF/CMAQ over Southeast of England

EMS September 2017 Dublin, Ireland

First steps toward a comparison of modelled thermal comfort during a heatwave in Melbourne, Australia

Wind Flow Modeling The Basis for Resource Assessment and Wind Power Forecasting

The Impact of Horizontal Resolution and Ensemble Size on Probabilistic Forecasts of Precipitation by the ECMWF EPS

608 SENSITIVITY OF TYPHOON PARMA TO VARIOUS WRF MODEL CONFIGURATIONS

Wind speed and direction predictions by WRF and WindSim coupling over Nygårdsfjell

SIMULATION OF ATMOSPHERIC STATES FOR THE CASE OF YEONG-GWANG STORM SURGE ON 31 MARCH 2007 : MODEL COMPARISON BETWEEN MM5, WRF AND COAMPS

A Modeling Study of PBL heights

Ocean responses using atmospheric fields at

Implementation and Evaluation of a Mesoscale Short-Range Ensemble Forecasting System Over the Pacific Northwest

Operational quantitative precipitation estimation using radar, gauge g and

2012 AHW Stream 1.5 Retrospective Results

Overview of HFIP FY10 activities and results

Modeling Study of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Characteristics in Industrial City by the Example of Chelyabinsk

QUANTITATIVE VERIFICATION STATISTICS OF WRF PREDICTIONS OVER THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION

A WRF Ensemble for Improved Wind Speed Forecasts at Turbine Height

Track sensitivity to microphysics and radiation

Comparison of Typhoon Track Forecast using Dynamical Initialization Schemeinstalled

Variational data assimilation of lightning with WRFDA system using nonlinear observation operators

Simulations of Lake Processes within a Regional Climate Model

LARGE-SCALE WRF-SIMULATED PROXY ATMOSPHERIC PROFILE DATASETS USED TO SUPPORT GOES-R RESEARCH ACTIVITIES

Influence of sea structures on wind measurements: CFD analysis

School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou , China 2

Improved rainfall and cloud-radiation interaction with Betts-Miller-Janjic cumulus scheme in the tropics

Uncertainties in planetary boundary layer schemes and current status of urban boundary layer simulations at OU

Real-time quantitative rainfall forecasts at hobli-level over Karnataka: evaluation for the winter monsoon 2010

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

Stable and transitional (and cloudy) boundary layers in WRF. Wayne M. Angevine CIRES, University of Colorado, and NOAA ESRL

Wind Assessment & Forecasting

Sensitivity of tropical cyclone Jal simulations to physics parameterizations

FINAL PROJECT REPORT YEAR: 2013 WTFRC Project Number: TR Project Title: High resolution weather forecasting for freeze prediction in WA

Supplementary Material

A Snow-Ratio Equation and Its Application to Numerical Snowfall Prediction

MM5 v3.6.1 and WRF v3.5.1 model comparison of standard and surface energy variables in the development of the planetary boundary layer

WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT USING WRF MODEL IN COMPLEX TERRAIN

Simulating roll clouds associated with low-level convergence in WRF

Downscaling and Probability

Application of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model for Air Quality Modeling in the San Francisco Bay Area

Prediction of tropical cyclone induced wind field by using mesoscale model and JMA best track

The WRF Microphysics and a Snow Event in Chicago

Implementation and Evaluation of a Mesoscale Short-Range Ensemble Forecasting System Over the Pacific Northwest

Saiful Islam Anisul Haque

Effect of Wind Turbine Wakes on the Performance of a Real Case WRF-LES Simulation

Mountain Wave Study at a Wind Farm Site in the Eastern Rocky Mountains

Transcription:

Wind conditions based on coupling between a mesoscale and microscale model José Laginha Palma and Carlos Veiga Rodrigues CEsA Centre for Wind Energy and Atmospheric Flows Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (Portugal) Presented at EWEA Technology Workshop: Resource Assessment 213 Trinity College, Dublin, (Ireland) 25 & 26 June 213 José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (1 of 15)

Contents Sites Contents 1 Wind conditions for wind resource assessment and wind power forecasting 2 Model chain comprised of: general circulation model ( 1 km) WRF, regional model (27 to 3 km) VENTOS /M, microscale model (3 2 m) 3 Comparison with measurements at 2 complex sites (14 anemometers over 7 masts) wind speed wind direction turbulence intensity IEC 614-1: Wind turbines Part 1: Design requirements shear factor José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (2 of 15)

Introduction Contents Sites Sites 1 and 2 4 masts, 2 & 4 m, 3 & 6 m 3 masts, 2 & 4 m, 3 & 6 m surface height: 3 to 115 m surface height: 12 to 132 m Jose L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (3 of 15)

Mesoscale Microscale Mesoscale: regional model WRF Weather Research and Forecasting model (version 3.2.1) ARW solver Initial/Boundary conditions: NCEP GDAS operational analyses NOAA RTG-SST Parameterization schemes: Microphysics: WRF Single-Moment 6-class Atmospheric radiation: Dudhia scheme for SW, RRTM for LW Cumulus parameterization: Kain-Fritsch scheme Planetary Boundary layer: ACM2 non-local closure Surface Layer: Pleim-Xiu scheme Land-Surface Model: Pleim-Xiu (2 layers) José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (4 of 15)

Mesoscale Microscale Mesoscale: domains and nesting configuration Northings ED5 UTM 29N (m) 5 48 46 44 42 4 38 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 2 4 6 8 1 Eastings ED5 UTM 29N (m) z (m) 175 125 75 25 75 25 5 Domain, grid, resolution: d1: 24 44, 27 km d2: 43 61, 9 km d3: 46 4, 3 km d4: 34 34, 3 km d5: 34 34, 3 km Vertical levels: 49 Output: 3 minutes Time-step (seconds): 18, 6, 2 Time periods: 25, July, 1 st to 15 th Summer 25, Nov. 19 th to Dec. 3 rd Autumn José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (5 of 15)

Mesoscale Microscale Microscale: surface grid José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (6 of 15)

Mesoscale Microscale Microscale: VENTOS /M SITE 1 Grid: 47 47 44 Domain: 18 18 km 7 x : 2 to 665 m z : 3 to 922 m Time-step: 2 s Partitions: 6 Speed-up: 4. / 3.8 Resolution masts: 211 25 m SITE 2 Grid: 42 49 44 Domain: 18 21 km 7 x : 15 to 984 m z : 3 to 919 m Time-step: 2 s Partitions: 4 Speed-up: 3.1 / 5.2 Resolution masts: 166 31 m - VENTOS is a software library (EC trade mark nº 476438), used since 22 by RES and 24 by NPC. - VENTOS /M, part of the VENTOS software library, is a new addition (212), with the ability to mimic the whole range of atmospheric phenomena at a micro-scale level with a lower number of physical simplifications, compared to either meso- or microscale conventional approaches. José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (7 of 15)

Error measures Introduction Error measures Summer period Autumn period High wind speeds (14 days: 19 Nov 3 Dec 25) Turbulence intensity Shear factor Mean square error MSE = 1 N (Φ pre Φ m) 2 (1) N n=1 where Φ is wind speed or wind direction and pre and m refer to predicted and measured values Root mean square error RMSE = 1 N N (Φ pre Φ m) 2 (2) n=1 Skill score SS = 1 MSE micro MSE meso (3) < SS 1, the coupled (micro) approach is superior to meso only. SS <, the coupled (micro) approach is worse than meso only. José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (8 of 15)

Summer period: results for site 1 Error measures Summer period Autumn period High wind speeds (14 days: 19 Nov 3 Dec 25) Turbulence intensity Shear factor Site 1 micro meso 4.5 RMSE for 4. 3.5 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 Time of day (Hour) M11 6 m micro meso cups 16 M11 6 m 33 5 6 3 micro meso cups 14 3 4 6 3 Records (%) 12 1 8 6 4 27 24 2 1 12 9 2 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Wind speed (m s 1 ) 21 Azimuth ( ) 18 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 Records (%) José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (9 of 15)

Autumn period: results for site 1 Error measures Summer period Autumn period High wind speeds (14 days: 19 Nov 3 Dec 25) Turbulence intensity Shear factor Site 1 micro meso 6 RMSE for 5 4 3 2 1 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 Time of day (Hour) M11 6 m micro meso cups 16 M11 6 m 33 35 3 3 micro meso cups 14 3 25 2 6 Records (%) 12 1 8 6 4 27 24 5 1 15 12 9 2 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 24 Wind speed (m s 1 ) 21 Azimuth ( ) 18 15 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Records (%) José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (1 of 15)

High wind speeds (14 days: 19 Nov 3 Dec 25) 3 25 Error measures Summer period Autumn period High wind speeds (14 days: 19 Nov 3 Dec 25) Turbulence intensity Shear factor M23 4 m (1h average) micro meso cups 2 15 1 Azimuth ( ) 5 36 33 3 27 24 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 25-11-19 25-11-2 25-11-21 25-11-22 25-11-23 25-11-24 25-11-25 25-11-26 25-11-27 Time (days) 25-11-28 25-11-29 25-11-3 25-12-1 25-12-2 25-12-3 25 M14 6 m (1h average) micro meso cups 2 15 1 5 Azimuth ( ) 36 33 3 27 24 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 25-11-19 25-11-2 25-11-21 25-11-22 25-11-23 25-11-24 25-11-25 25-11-26 25-11-27 Time (days) 25-11-28 25-11-29 25-11-3 25-12-1 25-12-2 25-12-3 José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (11 of 15)

Error measures Summer period Autumn period High wind speeds (14 days: 19 Nov 3 Dec 25) Turbulence intensity Shear factor Turbulence intensity and shear factor (IEC 614-1) Neutral flow simulations: TI and α nearly independent of wind speed ( presented at EWEC 21) TI @ 65 m 3 25 2 15 1 5 all data summer day winter night cfd : σ u 2/3 k cfd : σ V 4/3 k 5 1 15 { 2 25 3 @ 65 m } 33 α [3 m, 65 m].4.3.2.1..1.2.3.4 all data summer day winter night cfd cfd mean 5 1 15 { 2 25 3 @ 65 m } 33 Turbulence intensity and shear factor have become two indicators of increasing importance, given their impact of WT lifetime and operational costs. José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (12 of 15)

Turbulence intensity: effects due to stratification Error measures Summer period Autumn period High wind speeds (14 days: 19 Nov 3 Dec 25) Turbulence intensity Shear factor Summer Site 1 M14 6 m 25-7-1T: -- 25-7-15T: 8 day Autumn Site 1 M14 6 m 25-11-19T: -- 25-12-3T: 8 day 7 night 7 night 6 5 micro [ 2/3 k, σ V ], day micro [ 2/3 k, σ V ], night 6 5 micro [ 2/3 k, σ V ], day micro [ 2/3 k, σ V ], night TI (%) 4 TI (%) 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 5 1 15 2 8 Summer Site 2 M22 6 m 25-7-1T: -- 25-7-15T: day 5 1 15 2 25 3 8 Autumn Site 2 M22 6 m 25-11-19T: -- 25-12-3T: day 7 night 7 night 6 5 micro [ micro [ 2/3 k, σ V ], day 2/3 k, σ V ], night 6 5 micro [ micro [ 2/3 k, σ V ], day 2/3 k, σ V ], night TI (%) 4 TI (%) 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 5 1 15 2 5 1 15 2 25 3 José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (13 of 15)

Shear factor: effects due to stratification Error measures Summer period Autumn period High wind speeds (14 days: 19 Nov 3 Dec 25) Turbulence intensity Shear factor Summer Site 1 M14 25-7-1T: -- 25-7-15T: Autumn Site 1 M14 25-7-1T: -- 25-7-15T:.4.4 α (3m, 6m).2..2 α (3m, 6m).2..2 cup day cup night cup day cup night.4 meso day micro day meso night micro night.4 meso day micro day meso night micro night 5 1 15 2 Summer Site 2 M22 25-7-1T: -- 25-7-15T: 5 1 15 2 Autumn Site 2 M22 25-11-19T: -- 25-12-3T:.4.4 α (3m, 6m).2..2 α (3m, 6m).2..2 cup day cup night cup day cup night.4 meso day micro day meso night micro night.4 meso day micro day meso night micro night 5 1 15 2 5 1 15 2 José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (14 of 15)

Wind speed SS > for 1 out of 14 masts Autumn has higher RMSE (3.4 against 2.3 m s 1 ) Histograms: microscale captures high velocities and shows good agreement Wind direction Microscale performs worse on overall: mostly SS =.2 1.7, higher variability, higher bias and phase error. Wind roses: microscale captures most frequent sector are better in Autumn than Summer Turbulence intensity and shear factor Stratified flow: simulations able to capture increase of TI with decrease of V h Diurnal TI agreement is better than in nocturnal period Microscale shows better agreement than mesoscale and capture nocturnal negative shear factor trend José L. Palma & Carlos V. Rodrigues Meso and microscale coupling (15 of 15)