MATERIAL MECHANICS, SE2126 COMPUTER LAB 4 MICRO MECHANICS. E E v E E E E E v E E + + = m f f. f f

Similar documents
MATERIAL MECHANICS, SE2126 COMPUTER LAB 2 PLASTICITY

MATERIAL MECHANICS, SE2126 COMPUTER LAB 3 VISCOELASTICITY. k a. N t

Module 7: Micromechanics Lecture 29: Background of Concentric Cylinder Assemblage Model. Introduction. The Lecture Contains

Fig. 1. Circular fiber and interphase between the fiber and the matrix.

Module 7: Micromechanics Lecture 34: Self Consistent, Mori -Tanaka and Halpin -Tsai Models. Introduction. The Lecture Contains. Self Consistent Method

Composite FEM Lab-work

Composite models 30 and 131: Ply types 0 and 8 calibration

Most of the material in this package is based on a recently published book. This is:

DEVELOPMENT OF A MICROMECHANICAL MODEL IN INTERACTION WITH PARAMETERS RELATED TO THE MICROSTRUCTURE OF CARBON/EPOXY COMPOSITES

Module 2: Thermal Stresses in a 1D Beam Fixed at Both Ends

Micromechanical analysis of FRP hybrid composite lamina for in-plane transverse loading

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

Non-linear and time-dependent material models in Mentat & MARC. Tutorial with Background and Exercises

Microplane Model formulation ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary

AN EFFECTIVE SOLUTION OF THE COMPOSITE (FGM S) BEAM STRUCTURES

Effects of geometry and properties of fibre and matrix on overall. composite parameters

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF SYNTACTIC FOAM CORE SANDWICH USING A MULTIPLE SCALES BASED ASYMPTOTIC METHOD

Mechanical Properties of Fiber Reinforced Composites Using Buckminster Fullerene Reinforcement

Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Coir Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites Using a Micromechanical Approach

3D Elasticity Theory

Exercise: concepts from chapter 8

ISSN: ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology (IJESIT) Volume 2, Issue 4, July 2013

ENGN 2340 Final Project Report. Optimization of Mechanical Isotropy of Soft Network Material

Module III - Macro-mechanics of Lamina. Lecture 23. Macro-Mechanics of Lamina

Viscoelastic Damping Characteristics of Indium-Tin/SiC Particulate Composites

Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering

Micro-meso draping modelling of non-crimp fabrics

1 332 Laboratories 1. 2 Computational Exercises 1 FEA of a Cantilever Beam... 1 Experimental Laboratory: Tensile Testing of Materials...

Understand basic stress-strain response of engineering materials.

Module 7: Micromechanics Lecture 25: Strength of Materials Approach. Introduction. The Lecture Contains. Effective Transverse Modulus

PROMAL2012 SOFTWARE PACKAGE A USER GUIDE

Lab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages

Module 10: Free Vibration of an Undampened 1D Cantilever Beam

3D and Planar Constitutive Relations

A coupled field finite element model to predict actuation properties of piezoelectrically actuated bistable composites.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela , India

MICROMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF FRP COMPOSITES SUBJECTED TO LONGITUDINAL LOADING

Numerical Properties of Spherical and Cubical Representative Volume Elements with Different Boundary Conditions

Development of a code to generate randomly distributed short fiber composites to estimate mechanical properties using FEM

DESIGN OF LAMINATES FOR IN-PLANE LOADING

Post Graduate Diploma in Mechanical Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

Due Monday, September 14 th, 12:00 midnight

Effect of Specimen Dimensions on Flexural Modulus in a 3-Point Bending Test

Using the Timoshenko Beam Bond Model: Example Problem

Macroscopic theory Rock as 'elastic continuum'

Composite Structural Mechanics using MATLAB

6. Bending CHAPTER OBJECTIVES

Getting Started with Communications Engineering

Effect of fibre shape on transverse thermal conductivity of unidirectional composites

CHEM-C2410: Materials Science from Microstructures to Properties Composites: basic principles

Module 4: Behaviour of a Laminae-II. Learning Unit 1: M1. M4.1 Mechanics of Composites. M4.1.1 Introduction to Mechanics of Composites

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ARKANSAS TEST SERIES PILE #2 USING OPENSEES (WITH LPILE COMPARISON)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 4, No 1, 2013

A FINITE ELEMENT MODEL TO PREDICT MULTI- AXIAL STRESS-STRAIN RESPONSE OF CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES WITH STRAIN INDUCED DAMAGE

EFFECTS OF THERMAL STRESSES AND BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON THE RESPONSE OF A RECTANGULAR ELASTIC BODY MADE OF FGM

Mechanics of Composite Materials, Second Edition Autar K Kaw University of South Florida, Tampa, USA

FINITE ELEMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF NOVEL CONCEPT OF 3D FIBRE CELL STRUCTURE

Constitutive Equations

Computational Analysis for Composites

Due Tuesday, September 21 st, 12:00 midnight

A Constitutive Framework for the Numerical Analysis of Organic Soils and Directionally Dependent Materials

Stresses Analysis of Petroleum Pipe Finite Element under Internal Pressure

Computational Inelasticity FHLN05. Assignment A non-linear elasto-plastic problem

Stress, Strain Stress strain relationships for different types of materials Stress strain relationships for a unidirectional/bidirectional lamina

Comparison of Ply-wise Stress-Strain results for graphite/epoxy laminated plate subjected to in-plane normal loads using CLT and ANSYS ACP PrepPost

International Journal of Engineering Science

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139

Plane and axisymmetric models in Mentat & MARC. Tutorial with some Background

COURSE STE6289 Modern Materials and Computations (Moderne materialer og beregninger 7.5 stp.)

EXPERIMENT 4: AN ELECTRICAL-THERMAL ACTUATOR

CMU CS 462/662 (INTRO TO COMPUTER GRAPHICS) HOMEWORK 0.0 MATH REVIEW/PREVIEW LINEAR ALGEBRA

EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 2 Stress & Strain - Axial Loading

Composite Structures. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

ON THE NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE MATERIAL

Workshop 8. Lateral Buckling

2D Liquefaction Analysis for Bridge Abutment

Loss Amplification Effect in Multiphase Materials with Viscoelastic Interfaces

Lab Exercise #3: Torsion

Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. Preliminary Qualifying Examination Solid Mechanics February 25, 2002

CHEM-E2200: Polymer blends and composites Fibre architecture and principles of reinforcement

Response Spectrum Analysis Shock and Seismic. FEMAP & NX Nastran

Prediction of Micromechanical Behaviour of Elliptical Frp Composites

ASSESSMENT OF MIXED UNIFORM BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR PREDICTING THE MACROSCOPIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS

QUESTION BANK Composite Materials

Practice Final Examination. Please initial the statement below to show that you have read it

LAMINATION THEORY FOR THE STRENGTH OF FIBER COMPOSITE MATERIALS

Discrete Element Modelling of a Reinforced Concrete Structure

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENGINEERING RESEARCH, DINDIGUL Volume 2, No 1, 2011

A HIGHER-ORDER BEAM THEORY FOR COMPOSITE BOX BEAMS

Arbitrary Normal and Tangential Loading Sequences for Circular Hertzian Contact

Open-hole compressive strength prediction of CFRP composite laminates

Computational Materials Modeling FHLN05 Computer lab

σ = F/A ε = L/L σ ε a σ = Eε

CHAPTER THREE SYMMETRIC BENDING OF CIRCLE PLATES

6.4 A cylindrical specimen of a titanium alloy having an elastic modulus of 107 GPa ( psi) and

Axisymmetric Modeling. This tutorial gives an overview of axisymmetric modeling. Learn how to:

Chapter 2 - Macromechanical Analysis of a Lamina. Exercise Set. 2.1 The number of independent elastic constants in three dimensions are: 2.

Predicting Elastic Properties of Unidirectional SU8/ZnO Nanocomposites using COMSOL Multiphysics

Mechanics PhD Preliminary Spring 2017

A FULLY COUPLED MULTISCALE SHELL FORMULATION FOR THE MODELLING OF FIBRE REINFORCED LAMINATES

Transcription:

MATRIAL MCHANICS, S226 COMPUTR LAB 4 MICRO MCHANICS 2 2 2 f m f f m T m f m f f m v v + + = +

PART A SPHRICAL PARTICL INCLUSION Consider a solid granular material, a so called particle composite, shown in Figure. One common example of such a material is concrete, which is a mix of construction aggregate (stone or sand) in a cement matrix. This lab will deal with a little more exotic material than that. You will do calculations on a glass bead/epoxy particle composite with constituent properties given below. ν Glass poxy Glass = 70 GPa = 5GPa = ν = 0.3 poxy Figure. An example of a particle composite. One can not without great difficulty analyse this material in its complete configuration, analytically or with the aid of finite element calculations. This difficulty is of course attributed to the particles and the fact that they give rise to an inhomogeneous material. A way around this problem is to determine some effective properties and model the composite as a homogeneous solid with the effective properties instead. The effective mechanical properties of the homogenized material are a kind of mix, or weighted average, of the constituents mechanical properties. There are several analytical techniques suggested to find these effective properties, more or less accurate. This homogenization can also be performed using a finite element approach and the volume average equations from micro mechanics shown below.

Ω Ω To be able to perform the analysis one need to define a representative volume element (RV) that is a model of the material on the micro-scale. The RV will be inhomogeneous and needs to give a good representation of the micro structure, but it will also need to be able to represent the material on the macro-scale in an average sense. It needs to be space filling, and have the same constituent orientation and volume fraction as the whole structure it represents. Figure 2 shows the RV for a material with spherical inclusions. Figure 2. Cut out of spherical inclusion in matrix - RV The finite element approach adopted in this lab is summarized in the following steps:. Apply prescribed displacements on the boundary of the RV. The displacements should correspond to homogeneous strain fields within th e RV. 2. Calculate the volume average of stresses and strains, and. 3. The volume averages can be thought of as the homogenized macroscopic stresses and strain and will give the effective properties using Hooke s law.

The relation between average strains and displacements on the boundary of the RV reads, where one needs to remember that shear strains like γ ij is equal to 2ε ij etc. For the particular case of a prescribed strain we then set, 0 on the boundary of the RV. Solving the boundary value problem gives the stresses σ k ij and strains ε k ij in each element k. Since the volume of each element V k is known, the average stresses and strains can be approximated by a discrete sum over all N elements where denotes the average stress in element k. The homogenized effective properties and ν can be found from Hooke s law. Here shown for macroscopic strain in the x-direction, but similar in the y and z-directions. This theory session sets the scene for the lab, now lets get started!

Start ANSYS via the ANSYS Product Launcher as usual, i.e. make sure you are working on the C: hard drive. You need to download the input files from the course web page. There are three files for this part of the lab. First the pre-processor file, and then one for axial strain loading in the x-direction and one for shear strain loading in the xz-plane. Open up the pre-processor file in a text file editor. Look for the value for the parameter Rp. This is the radius of the particle inclusion. You should set it to a value between 3 and 8 mm. Based on Rp the volume fraction v f of particles should be calculated. How does the radius of the inclusion and the radius of the whole RV (Rm) relate to the volume fraction? Rp = v f = When you have changed the value for the radius (don t change Rm, just Rp!) save the file, and open it up in ANSYS via File > Read Input from Since the geometry is symmetric with respect to all the coordinate axes one could think that modelling only one eight (/8) would be enough, but this would unnecessarily complicate the formulation of boundary conditions. Here, half of the sphere is modelled. You will investigate two things in this part of the lab. First you will look at the response from a pure axial strain state at the boundary to determine the effective Young s modulus and Poisson s ratio of the RV. Secondly you will apply a shear strain to the boundary and determine the effective Shear modulus of the RV. The axial strain loading will be given, as described above, as a controlled displacement on the outer boundary, i.e. the curved boundary. To start the solver just read the file PartA_AxialStrainX.txt into ANSYS. When the solution is done, feel free to have a look at the results in the usual way, if you like. You will not use the graphical post-

processing ability in this lab, but it is a good way to check if your finite element solver has done what you wanted it to do. To get some meaningful results you will need to work with something that is called lement Tables, which is just a tabular form of the results for each element. There will only be one result for each element and field variable, which might be a little surprising since the elements used in this analysis are 20 node brick elements and therefore should contain more than one value for each field variable (depends on the number of integration points in the element). What ANSYS does is that it averages the results in each element so you only get one unique element result for each field variable. A slight loss of accuracy, but we will have to live with that. If we know the volume average strains in two directions and the volume average stresses we can calculate the effective properties using Hooke s law. Verify these equations by considering Hooke s law with 0. To find the volume average results needed in the equations above go to ANSYS Main Menu > General Postproc > lement Table > Define Table to bring up the lement Table Data screen. Here you will need to Add the results you want to average. By highlighting one result set at a time from the list and clicking on apply you will create an element table for each of these results. Don t forget to add a table for the element volumes. When you are done adding results just close the lement Table Data screen. Now you will need to multiply each element result with the volume of that particular element. To do this, click on General Postproc > lement Table > Multiply to bring up

the Multiply lement Table Items screen. Multiply all your result tables with the volume table. This will create a new table that you will need to give a unique name so you know which results it contains. See picture below for explanation. Here the element table results for shear stress SXZ is being multiplied with the volume table VOLU. Notice the user label for the new table! When you have all your results multiplied with the volume you will need to sum them all up (this operation represents the integral over the volume). This is done by clicking on Sum of ach Item. Now you will need to divide each sum with the summed total volume, thus finalizing the volume average operation. You can use the result sheet at the end to record your values and to calculate the effective properties. For the second part just clear the model and reload the geometry using the pre-processor file again. This time you will solve the same model but with a shear strain loaded boundary instead. This is done by reading in the solver file PartA_ShearStrainXZ.txt that applies the following displacement field to the outer boundary. 2 2

In the same manner as the previous part you will now need to find the effective shear modulus. Hooke s law for the shear modulus is a lot simpler, so you will only need two results to determine it. In linear isotropic elasticity there is a well known relation between the Young s modulus, the Poisson s ratio and the shear modulus. Check if this still applies between your effective properties? 2 Finally you will have a look at the Reuss bound for compliance and Voigt s bound for stiffness. These bounds define maximum and minimum values for the effective shear modulus and bulk modulus. You will only look at the bounds for the shear modulus here. The Reuss bound is; and the Voigt s bound is: Ω Ω Can you figure out how to calculate these bounds given what you know of the volume fractions of particles and the shear modulus of the particle and the matrix? A hint is that the equations are quite simple, and are similar in style to the Rule of mixtures equations. Did your previously calculated effective shear modulus fall with in the bounds? It should have

PART B HXAGONAL R.V.. Consider a unidirectional fibre composite with the fibres arranged in a hexagonal pattern, as shown in Figure 3a below. The representative volume element would, as it might be easy to guess, have a hexagonal shape with the fibre in the middle. A schematic figure of what the RV would look like is shown in Figure 3b. y x z Figure 3. a) The hexagonal pattern of the fibre composite. b) The representative volume element. Once again your task is to find the effective properties of this composite by using the micro mechanics approach. This time it will be much harder to do this from an analytical formula like the one derived from Hooke s law in part A. Why is that do you think? What is the major difference between the directional dependence of the RV in part A and in this part? The composite is a carbon fibre reinforced epoxy with properties given below. ν Carbon poxy Carbon = 250 GPa = 5GPa = ν = 0.3 poxy First you will need to get 7 files from the course home page. The pre-processor file contains the geometry and the mesh, as usual. The other 6 files correspond to the 6 possible strain loadings, all according to the name of the file. Before you read in the geometry into ANSYS you should open up that file in a text editor and change the value

of the parameter r, the radius of the fibre. Pick any value between 3 and 7 mm (you might get a warning about bad shapes of some elements ignore that). r = v f = Now save the file and read in the geometry in ANSYS in the usual way. Consider the following matrix equation for the volume averages of the stresses and strains. So if you apply each strain component one at a time you can look at the resulting stress components, and in that way calculate the corresponding column in the stiffness matrix. Since the definition and multiplication of the element results tables are somewhat time consuming those operations has been included in the solver text files for simplicity. All you will have to do after each solution is to click on Sum of ach Item to bring up the numerical results. Now solve the model by applying strain in the x-direction to the boundary, i.e. read in the solver file PartB_X.txt in ANSYS. Look at the summed results. For each solution you do, 5 of the 6 strain results are very close to zero, and from an analytical point of view they are exactly zero, and that is what you will assume them to be.

So, for example, for strain loading on the boundary in the z-directio, the matrix equation above would reduce to the following: Thus, by some easily performed calculations you have the entire third column of the stiffness matrix. The stresses multiplied by the element volumes are named according to; S_X_V for the stresses in the x-direction and S_YZ_V for the shear stress in the yz-plane. Similarly for the strains multiplied with the element volumes you will have; PS_X_V, and PS_YZ_V for the corresponding axial and shear strains. The height, or the length, of the RV along the z-axis will have an effect on the results. This is not really what you would want for an accurate model, but it can be good to have seen this behaviour. You will for example be able to see effects of this when you look at the longitudinal stresses after prescribing a longitudinal displacement on the boundary. Look at the edge between the fibre and the matrix, and you should see a ring-like stress gradient. Preferably, that should not be there. But to avoid this effect all together you would need to change the boundary conditions to something called periodic boundary conditions, and they are a little bit tricky to apply and more than we have time to do here. Now solve for all the different load cases, one at a time, and start to fill out the stiffness matrix with you calculated values. It will be sufficient if you record the values in GPa with only one decimal place (the program will give you the stresses measured in MPa). After a few solutions, can you see a pattern emerging in the stiffness matrix? What kind of symmetries would you expect given the geometry of the RV?

In chapter 5.4 of Gudmundsons book Material Mechanics several material symmetries are presented. Do any of them seem to fit your results? So what about those effective properties then? How do you find them now? If you consider the compliance matrix of a transversely isotropic material given below you will see that it is quite easy now. Remember that the compliance matrix S is just the inverse of the stiffness matrix C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Record your values for the effective properties on the answer sheet at the end. There are several alternatives to performing this kind of analysis to get the effective properties. You will compare your results to two of them. The first is what is called the Rule of mixtures and the second is an empirical set of relations called the Halpin-Tsai equations. Rule of mixtures gives the following equations for the effective properties:

Halpin-Tsai predicts the same longitudinal stiffness and Poisson s ratio as Rule of mixtures, but for the other two, the equations are as follows: ; ; ; 2 ;

PART C DOS LNGTH MATTR? The most common model of a fibre composite is the one where the fibres are as long as the whole structure. The fibres go from end to end so to speak. In many common applications this is usually not true. One example is short fibre glass/polyester composite, that are very common in many applications today. In this part you will look at a unidirectional fibre composite with short fibres embedded in a matrix, see Figure 4 below. ν Glass Polyester Glass = 70 GPa = 2.5 GPa = ν = 0.3 Polyester Figure 4. A short fibre composite. The question you will investigate here is if this has any effect on the effective mechanical properties of the composite? You will only look at the longitudinal stiffness in this part. The model of the representative volume element can be very much simplified by using symmetries. First realize that the geometry is symmetric with respect to the longitudinal axis of the fibre, so an axi-symmetric 2D model is applicable. Secondly there is also symmetry with respect to the middle of the fibre, so a symmetry condition can be applied there as well, effectively cutting the model in half. A schematic of the model can be seen in Figure 5.

y R L/2 L f /2 x R/2 Figure 5. The model geometry. Rotational symmetry is imposed along the y-axis and ordinary symmetry along the x-axis. Download the single input file from the course webpage. Open up the input file and change the value of Lf, the fibre length, to a value between 20 and 80 mm. Lf = v f = Save the file and open it in ANSYS, this will initiate both the pre-processor and the solver. The loading in this part will be a prescribed displacement on the boundary in the y-direction. If you look at the solution for the stress in the y-direction, you will notice that there is a stress gradient at the end of the fibre. The stresses in the fibre needs some distance to build up, so the fibre is not used in an optimal way.

Because of this the estimated effective properties calculated by the Rule of mixtures are quite off. This can be corrected by assuming that there is an ineffective fibre length L i. The approach to estimating this is outlined below: Find the stress in the y-direction at the node located at position (0,0). Provided that the fibre is not too short, this is the stress that should appear in the whole fibre if it was used optimally. To do this, use the List Results > Nodal Solution. The node you are looking for has node number. Record the stress in the y-direction as 0,0 on the answer sheet. Now calculate the volume average of in the whole fibre. To do this use element tables, where you can multiply and sum element results. You will however need to select just the elements of the fibre; otherwise you will average the whole model instead of just the fibre. Type in the command: CMSL,S,FIBR. This will select only the predefined area component corresponding to just the fibre part of the model. Now you need to select all the elements in that area by typing: SLA. This selects the elements from an already selected area. Now calculate the volume average stresses of the fibre in the y-direction. Ω f The difference between the two stresses is essentially a measure of the effective fibre length, where denotes the so called ineffective stress. An average stress that is smaller than 0,0 can be seen as the stress 0,0 acting on the effective fibre length, and a vanishing stress acting on the remaining part of the fibre. Thus, 0,0 Now you solve this for the ineffective fibre length and record it on the answer sheet. What does that length measure actually mean?

That was all for this time, and for this course. Thanks for your participation. Good luck on the exam!

RSULTS FROM PART A SPHRICAL PARTICL INCLUSION Rp = v f = 2??

RSULTS FROM PART B HXAGONAL R.V.. r = v f = [ C] = To invert C you will probably need to use a numerical tool like Matlab or an advanced calculator. FM RoM Halpin-Tsai L L L T T T ν LT ν LT ν LT G LT G LT G LT

RSULTS FROM PART C DOS LNGTH MATTR? Lf = v f = 0,0