Cross Section of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell

Similar documents
Development of Bifunctional Electrodes for Closed-loop Fuel Cell Applications. Pfaffenwaldring 6, Stuttgart, Germany

Advanced Analytical Chemistry Lecture 12. Chem 4631

Modeling as a tool for understanding the MEA. Henrik Ekström Utö Summer School, June 22 nd 2010

Basic overall reaction for hydrogen powering

Generation of Hydrogen Peroxide In ORR Over Low Loadings of Pt/C Catalysts

January 21, 2004 Fuel Cell Engineering Course CHEG 320 Taught at UTC Fuel Cells. Fuel Cells

Review of temperature distribution in cathode of PEMFC

Basic overall reaction for hydrogen powering

e - Galvanic Cell 1. Voltage Sources 1.1 Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell

Modeling the Behaviour of a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane within a Fuel Cell Using COMSOL

Oxygen Reduction Reaction

Modeling of Liquid Water Distribution at Cathode Gas Flow Channels in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell - PEMFC

General Energy PEM Membrane Tests

Fuel Cells Jong Hak Kim Chemical Engineering Yonsei University

Facile and Gram-scale Synthesis of Metal-free Catalysts: Toward Realistic Applications for Fuel Cells

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS ON 36cm 2 PEM FUEL CELL FOR PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT

Fuel Cell Activities in MME Waterloo

Introductory Lecture: Principle and Applications of Fuel Cells (Methanol/Air as Example)

Polyoxometalate Coupled Graphene Oxide-Nafion Composite. Membrane for Fuel Cell Operating at Low Relative Humidity

Figure 1. Schematic of Scriber Associates Model 850C fuel cell system.

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD MODELLING OF A HIGH TEMPERATURE PEM FUEL CELL

PGM-free OER Catalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzer

Modelling fuel cells in start-up and reactant starvation conditions

High Performance Membrane Electrode Assemblies by Optimization of Processes and Supported Catalysts

Batteries (Electrochemical Power Sources)

Basic Concepts in Electrochemistry

III. Reaction Kinetics Lecture 15: Ion Adsorption and Intercalation

Fuel Cells in Energy Technology. Tutorial 5 / SS solutions. Prof. W. Schindler, Jassen Brumbarov / Celine Rüdiger

Optimization of platinum nanoparticles for proton exchange membrane fuel cells using pulse electrochemical deposition

Prof. Mario L. Ferrari

Joint Sino-German Project GZ 205 (101/5) New composite DMFC anode with PEDOT as mixed conductor and catalyst support. Report

Modeling of Electrochemical Cells: HYD Lecture 04. Overview of transport processes in PEMs

ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF PERFORMANCE OF A PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANE (PEM) FUEL CELL IN MOBILE APPLICATIONS

produce water. Figure 1. Basic Diagram of a PEMFC. [1]

Nanostructured Ti 0.7 Mo 0.3 O 2 Support Enhances Electron Transfer to Pt : High-Performance Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction

Graphene-based Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Conversion

Graphene-based Air Electrodes for Solid Oxide Electrochemical Cells

Current and Temperature Distributions in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell

Fernando O. Raineri. Office Hours: MWF 9:30-10:30 AM Room 519 Tue. 3:00-5:00 CLC (lobby).

Effect of Dispersion Solvent in Catalyst Ink on Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance

Combinatorial Heterogeneous Catalysis

FUEL CELLS in energy technology (4)

POLITECNICO DI MILANO

Solutions for Assignment-6

Electroplating/ Electrodeposition

Simulation of MEA in PEMFC and Interface of Nanometer-Sized Electrodes

Highly Durable MEA for PEMFC Under High Temperature and Low Humidity Conditions. Eiji Endoh a. Yokohama, JAPAN

Journal of Power Sources

DMFC Models and Applications - A Literature Survey, Part I

Mathematical Modeling for a PEM Fuel Cell.

Nernst voltage loss in oxyhydrogen fuel cells

Electrolytes for Fuel Cells

Direct Energy Conversion: Fuel Cells

Electrochemical Cell - Basics

Pt and Pt-Ru Based Catalyst for DMFC

Lecture 29: Forced Convection II

SEPARATION BY BARRIER

Study of current distribution and oxygen diffusion in the fuel cell cathode catalyst layer through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

i i ne. (1) i The potential difference, which is always defined to be the potential of the electrode minus the potential of the electrolyte, is ln( a

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF PEM FUEL CELL CATHODES: COMPARISON OF FIRST-ORDER AND HALF-ORDER REACTION KINETICS

Catalyst Development Needs

Master of Applied Science

Course Specification

Oxygen Transfer Model in Cathode GDL of PEM Fuel Cell for Estimation of Cathode Overpotential

High-Performance Blend Membranes Composed of An Amphoteric Copolymer Containing Supramolecular Nanosieves for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells

Investigation of Membrane Electrode Assembly Design and Fabrication Parameters

The Curious Case of Au Nanoparticles

EnzHyd Enzymes and organometallic catalysts in hydrogen fuel cells PAN-H 2008 Vincent Artero irtsv/cbm CEA Grenoble

Iranian Journal of Hydrogen & Fuel Cell 2(2017) Iranian Journal of Hydrogen & Fuel Cell IJHFC. Journal homepage://ijhfc.irost.

Figure 1. Contact mode AFM (A) and the corresponding scanning Kelvin probe image (B) of Pt-TiN surface.

sensors ISSN by MDPI

Miami Dade College CHM Second Semester General Chemistry

CURRICULUM VITAE. 1. Synthesis and characterizations of Pd Modified Pt/C Catalysts for. Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell.

Performance Simulation of Passive Direct Methanol Fuel Cell

Improvement of Electrocatalyst Performance in Hydrogen Fuel Cells by Multiscale Modelling

Atomic Layer Deposition of TiO 2 support on PEM to Increase Fuel Cell Electrode Durability by CO Oxidation Enhancement

LITHIUM ION BATTERIES

Efficiency of Hydrogen Recovery from Reformate with a Polymer Electrolyte Hydrogen Pump

Improved Fuel Transport Selectivity in Polymer Electrolyte Membranes. Kyle Tyler Clark. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the

Supporting information:

Supporting Information for. Highly durable Pd metal catalysts for the oxygen. reduction reaction in fuel cells; Coverage of Pd metal with.

Scientific Report. Concerning the implementation of the project: January December 2014

Introduction Fuel Cells Repetition

DISCLAIMER. Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

Ugur Pasaogullari, Chao-Yang Wang Electrochemical Engine Center The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA, 16802

Electrode Structure Effects on the Performance of Open-Cathode Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: A Multiscale Modeling Approach

AUTOMOTIVE EXHAUST AFTERTREATMENT

Multi-physics Simulation of a Circular-Planar Anode-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cell

VI. EIS STUDIES LEAD NANOPOWDER

Two-phase microfluidics, heat and mass transport in direct methanol fuel cells

Optimization on Serpentine flow channel of PEMFC using RSM

Impedance Analysis on Transient Behavior of DMFC Anodes during Preconditioning Process

The impact of anode design on fuel crossover of direct ethanol fuel cell

Transient carbon monoxide poisoning of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell operating on diluted hydrogen feed

STEADY FLOW AND PULSED PERFORMANCE TRENDS OF HIGH CONCENTRATION DMFCS. A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty. Larry K.

Identification and Analysis of Key Factors Affecting Performance of PEM Fuel Cell

Performance Analysis of a Two phase Non-isothermal PEM Fuel Cell

Dr. V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Department of Mechanical Engineering, B V Raju Institute of Technology, Narsapur, Telangana,, India

Electrocatalytic Investigation of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cells

Towards a model concept for coupling porous gas diffusion layer and gas distributor in PEM fuel cells

Transcription:

PEMFC Electrodes 1

Cross Section of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Anode Cathode 2

Typical PEMFC Electrodes: - Anode Hydrogen Oxidation - Pt Ru / C - Cathode Oxygen reduction - Pt / C Pt is alloyed with Ru to enhance CO tolerance of Anode electrocatalyst 3

Blacks vs. supported catalysts Pt black large particle sizes difficult to prevent agglomeration - Leads to low surface area (SA) Supported Pt: - High SA carbon used as support - Smaller Pt particle size - Better dispersion - Larger SA 4

Dispersion Ratio of surface atoms to bulk atoms - higher dispersion, smaller particle size -larger SA Assuming spherical particles: SA = 6 / (ρ pt x d) (1) Where ρ pt = density of Pt, d = particle diameter 5

Pt particle size vs. SA 6

Anode Catalysis H 2 electrooxidation in absence of impurities H 2H + 2e; E = 0V 2 o + Net reaction at anode (2) 7

Proposed mechanism In acidic electrolytes, a two step mechanism is thought to occur 1. Dissociative adsorption of hydrogen 2. Charge transfer (oxidation) H 2 adsorption is the rate limiting step 8

Mechanism H 2 + 2Pt 2Pt H ads (3) 2 Pt H 2Pt + 2H + + 2e ads (4) 9

Characteristics High exchange current density (i o ~ 1mA/cm 2 ) on Pt single crystals Therefore no significant overpotential upon increased load Reaction proceeds efficiently with very low Pt loadings 0.05 mg/cm 2 is sufficient 10

Problems? Pure H 2 anode feed unrealistic Typically at least 10 ppm (upto 20,000ppm) of CO present in feed stream CO acts as a poison: adsorbs on Pt reduces active sites for H 2 adsorption Increases anode overpotential CO Tolerant Fuel Cells Discussed in separate lecture 11

Effect of CO in Reformate on Performance Data obtained at LANL 12

Cathode electrolysis Oxygen reduction reaction + O + 4H + 4e 2H O 2 2 (5) 13

Characteristics Lower exchange current density (10-4 to 10-6 ma/cm 2 ) on Pt Much higher overpotential (compared to pure H 2 oxidation) for a given current density Higher loadings (0.4 mg/cm 2 ) needed Kinetics strong function of oxygen partial pressure (0.7 1 order) 14

Effect of oxygen concentration 15

Components of an oxygen reduction electrode - Pt catalyst - Carbon support - Ionomer (to facilitate proton conduction) - Teflon (optional) to create hydrophobic channels permits gas diffusion through unwetted pores 16

Need for ionomer contact with electrocatalyst Protons need to: (a) get to anode / membrane interface from anode electrocatalyst oxidation site (b) get to the cathode Pt site from membrane / cathode interface Ionomer / catalyst contact is essential to minimize resistive losses 17

Oxygen transport Reactant interaction with Pt crucial (recall strong kinetic dependence on concentration of Oxygen) Thus viable path for oxygen transport needed Places limitation on electrode thickness and composition 18

The three phases Catalyst Ionomer Reactant Intimate 3 phase contact essential for low overpotential 19

Typical model Catalyst Particle Ionomeric Skin Reactant diffuses through the skin, and interacts with the catalyst 20

Optimization Factors to be considered include: - catalyst loading - supported / unsupported - ionomer loading - electrode thickness - electrode porosity - ratio of hydrophobic / hydrophilic pores Note each optimized electrode will only be optimal at a given operating condition different conditions result in different optima! 21

Interesting tradeoffs Catalyst loading: - Kinetics vs. Mass transport Catalyst Ionomer loading: - Catalytic activity vs. mass transport - Ionic resistance vs. mass transport - Electronic vs. ionic resistance 22

Kinetics vs. transport Larger catalyst loading thicker electrode (for a given catalyst): - Decrease in kinetic losses to a certain loading (thickness) - Increase in mass transport losses (increased thickness) - above a certain thickness (loading) Increasing catalyst loading only works until mass transport effects negate gains in kinetics 23

A caveat Recall catalysts are typically Pt supported on carbon Increasing the % of Pt/C higher Pt density per gram of catalyst For given Pt loading (and ionomer content): - lower electrode thickness with increasing Pt content in Pt/C catalyst Note that Pt surface area decreases with increasing Pt loading in Pt/C - lower catalyst utilization 24

Note that: Ionomer loading - Ionomer presence is essential - Homogeneous distribution required - Must intertwine with Pt particles Also recall: - Good ionomer does not permit large reactant crossover - Low oxygen permeability through ionomer - Diffusional problems! - Good ionomer does not conduct electrons 25

Catalytic activity vs. mass transport Large ionomer loading: - Good contacting with Pt particles - High catalyst utilization - High catalytic activity However: - Large ionomeric skin thickness (slide 20) - Enhanced diffusional losses 26

Ionic resistance vs. mass transport Large ionomer loading: - Good ionomeric network between catalyst site and membrane electrode interface - High proton conductivity / transport - Low resistive losses However: - Large ionomeric skin thickness (slide 20) - Enhanced diffusional losses 27

Ionic vs. electronic resistance Large ionomer loading: - Good ionomeric network between catalyst site and membrane electrode interface - High proton conductivity / transport - Low resistive losses However: - Extensive coating of carbon network with non electron conducting ionomer - Enhanced electronic resistance losses 28

Complex interplay Catalyst loading Pt content in Pt/C Electrode thickness Ionomer loading Kinetic losses Ohmic losses Transport losses 29

Optimization Extremely challenging difficult to manipulate single parameters Optimal compositions change with type of catalyst even from manufacturer to manufacturer Optimal compositions certainly change with operating conditions 30

Typical catalyst ink manufacture Catalyst + solvent (methanol) Stirring / sonication Additional steps may include: Addition of ionomer - Drying and redissolution - Heat treatment - Addition of Teflon Stirring / sonication 31

Added complexity Variables in catalyst ink manufacture: - Temperature of ink manufacture - Type / extent of agitation - Heat treatment - Solvent used Any change in above results in different optimal compositions for any given condition 32

Yet another parameter MEA manufacturing technique Several techniques of applying catalyst to membrane Broad subdivision: - Catalyst applied to membrane - Catalyst applied to gas diffusion layer 33

Catalyst applied to membrane Spraying onto membrane Silk screening onto membrane Decal transfer 34

Spraying onto membrane Preparation of Catalyst Ink: low viscosity;good particle dispersion needed Use of ultrasonic, magnetic stirring, homogenizers etc. preferred dispersion techniques Variables include dispersion time, solution viscosity, dispersion temperature, solvent used etc. 35

Spraying onto membrane - setup IR lamp Membrane (active area exposed) The lamp enables solvent evaporation The carrier gas propels the dispersion on to the membrane surface Caution carrier gas pressure must be low enough to prevent hole formation Can be done by hand. Spray gun (paint brush) Better control obtained using computer controlled X-Y recorder based spraying instrument Carrier Gas (N 2 ) 36

Silk screening Preparation of Catalyst Ink: higher viscosity;good particle dispersion needed Use of ultrasonic, magnetic stirring, homogenizers etc. preferred dispersion techniques viscosity controlled by external agents such as ethylene glycol Variables include dispersion time, solution viscosity, dispersion temperature, solvent used etc. 37

Silk Screening - setup Brush to spread the ink Screen known mesh size Masks to expose desired active area Membrane Substrate Note all pneumatically controlled! 38

Decal transfer Preparation of Catalyst Ink: highest viscosity;good particle dispersion needed Use of ultrasonic, magnetic stirring, homogenizers etc. preferred dispersion techniques viscosity controlled by external agents such as ethylene glycol Variables include dispersion time, solution viscosity, dispersion temperature, solvent used etc. 39

Decal transfer - methodology blank Paint (or silk screen / spray) ink onto blank desired quantity heat treat to evaporate solvent Blank + ink Blank + ink Place painted blank onto membrane - Hot press membrane blank membrane + ink Peel off blank Repeat procedure on other side different blank blank + membrane + ink 40

Catalyst applied to GDL Prepare catalyst ink desired viscosity Apply on to porous gas diffusion layer Spraying Silk screening Dry the ink evaporate solvent 41

Making the MEA Catalyst coated GDL Membrane Catalyst coated GDL Hot press 42

Catalyst onto membrane Merits High catalyst utilization Intimate interfacial contact Demerits Can be complicated Can lead to wastage especially if spraying is used The other two techniques do not lead to wastage but are difficult to use with thin membranes 43

Catalyst onto GDL Merits Simple technique Less wastage of catalyst especially if catalyst is screened onto GDL Demerits Low catalyst utilization catalyst lost in GDL pores Interfacial contact may be poor Risk of short circuiting especially with thin membranes 44

Remarks On the whole, applying the catalyst onto the membrane is the preferred technique for high performance Decal transfer with catalyst inks screened on to the surface of the blank most elegant technique good reproducibility 45