Overview - Previous lecture 1/2

Similar documents
CHAPTER 9 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES

Light in Matter (Hecht Ch. 3)

Macroscopic dielectric theory

4. The interaction of light with matter

Fourier Series and Fourier Transforms

Electromagnetic fields and waves

3 Constitutive Relations: Macroscopic Properties of Matter

Lecture 21 Reminder/Introduction to Wave Optics

Lecture 2 Notes, Electromagnetic Theory II Dr. Christopher S. Baird, faculty.uml.edu/cbaird University of Massachusetts Lowell

Solution Set 2 Phys 4510 Optics Fall 2014

Final Exam - PHYS 611 Electromagnetic Theory. Mendes, Spring 2013, April

Arvind Borde / PHY 12, Week 7: Electromagnetic Radiation

Electrodynamics I Final Exam - Part A - Closed Book KSU 2005/12/12 Electro Dynamic

Signals and Systems Lecture (S2) Orthogonal Functions and Fourier Series March 17, 2008

= k, (2) p = h λ. x o = f1/2 o a. +vt (4)

Light as a Transverse Wave.

ENGIN 211, Engineering Math. Fourier Series and Transform

Electromagnetic Waves

Optics and Optical Design. Chapter 5: Electromagnetic Optics. Lectures 9 & 10

Lecture 27 Frequency Response 2

Differential Equations

Physics 351, Spring 2017, Homework #4. Due at start of class, Friday, February 10, 2017

EA2.3 - Electronics 2 1

Main Notation Used in This Book

INTERACTION OF LIGHT WITH MATTER

Physics 142 Wave Optics 1 Page 1. Wave Optics 1. For every complex problem there is one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. H.L.

Group Velocity and Phase Velocity

Wave Phenomena Physics 15c. Lecture 11 Dispersion

Plasmonics: elementary excitation of a plasma (gas of free charges) nano-scale optics done with plasmons at metal interfaces

OPTI510R: Photonics. Khanh Kieu College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona Meinel building R.626

Salmon: Introduction to ocean waves

4. Sinusoidal solutions

Periodic functions: simple harmonic oscillator

LINEAR RESPONSE THEORY

The Interaction of Light and Matter: α and n

Physics 3312 Lecture 9 February 13, LAST TIME: Finished mirrors and aberrations, more on plane waves

H ( E) E ( H) = H B t

Overview in Images. S. Lin et al, Nature, vol. 394, p , (1998) T.Thio et al., Optics Letters 26, (2001).

Chapter 9 WAVES IN COLD MAGNETIZED PLASMA. 9.1 Introduction. 9.2 The Wave Equation

Fourier transforms, Generalised functions and Greens functions

Grading. Class attendance: (1 point/class) x 9 classes = 9 points maximum Homework: (10 points/hw) x 3 HW = 30 points maximum

Derivation of the General Propagation Equation

Wave Phenomena Physics 15c. Masahiro Morii

d 1 µ 2 Θ = 0. (4.1) consider first the case of m = 0 where there is no azimuthal dependence on the angle φ.

in Electromagnetics Numerical Method Introduction to Electromagnetics I Lecturer: Charusluk Viphavakit, PhD

Light and Matter. Thursday, 8/31/2006 Physics 158 Peter Beyersdorf. Document info

10. Optics of metals - plasmons

ECE 487 Lecture 6 : Time-Dependent Quantum Mechanics I Class Outline:

Total Internal Reflection & Metal Mirrors

Chapter 9. Electromagnetic waves

18. Standing Waves, Beats, and Group Velocity

Introduction to Seismology Spring 2008

This is the number of cycles per unit time, and its units are, for example,

Summary of Beam Optics

221B Lecture Notes on Resonances in Classical Mechanics

Plasma Physics Prof. V. K. Tripathi Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 12: Earthquake source mechanisms and radiation patterns II

PHYS4210 Electromagnetic Theory Spring Final Exam Wednesday, 6 May 2009

Seismic wavepropagation concepts applied to the interpretation of marine controlled-source electromagnetics

Lecture 1 Notes: 06 / 27. The first part of this class will primarily cover oscillating systems (harmonic oscillators and waves).

Physics 218 Practice Final Exam

THE KRAMERS-KRONIG RELATIONS FOR LIGHT MOVING BACKWARDS IN TIME. Evangelos Chaliasos. 365 Thebes Street. GR Aegaleo.

Midterm Exam Solutions

Handbook of Radiation and Scattering of Waves:

SOFT X-RAYS AND EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION

Complex number review

We call these coupled differential equations, because as you can see the derivative of θ1 involves θ2 and the derivative of the θ2 involves θ1.

Skoog Chapter 6 Introduction to Spectrometric Methods

Insertion Devices Lecture 2 Wigglers and Undulators. Jim Clarke ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory

REFLECTION AND REFRACTION OF PLANE EM WAVES

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 10, February 10, / 4

Basics of electromagnetic response of materials

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Electromagnetic Waves

Plasma Processes. m v = ee. (2)

6. LIGHT SCATTERING 6.1 The first Born approximation

Physical Acoustics. Hearing is the result of a complex interaction of physics, physiology, perception and cognition.

Frequency- and Time-Domain Spectroscopy

Activity 2: Physics and the Visual Arts

Physics 3312 Lecture 7 February 6, 2019

AC Circuits Homework Set

B2.III Revision notes: quantum physics

Chiroptical Spectroscopy

Short Wire Antennas: A Simplified Approach Part I: Scaling Arguments. Dan Dobkin version 1.0 July 8, 2005

Chapter 5: Molecular Scale Models for Macroscopic Dynamic Response. Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem:

Microscopic-macroscopic connection

BASIC WAVE CONCEPTS. Reading: Main 9.0, 9.1, 9.3 GEM 9.1.1, Giancoli?

Written homework due on Monday at the start of class Online homework due on Tuesday by 8 am

Notes on Huygens Principle 2000 Lawrence Rees

Solutions: Homework 7

Electromagnetic Waves

If electrons moved in simple orbits, p and x could be determined, but this violates the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

Selected Topics in Mathematical Physics Prof. Balakrishnan Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Let s consider nonrelativistic electrons. A given electron follows Newton s law. m v = ee. (2)

The Larmor Formula (Chapters 18-19)

MITOCW MITRES_6-007S11lec09_300k.mp4

Wave Phenomena Physics 15c. Lecture 17 EM Waves in Matter

APPLIED OPTICS POLARIZATION

Chapter 16 Waves in One Dimension

Ver 3808 E1.10 Fourier Series and Transforms (2014) E1.10 Fourier Series and Transforms. Problem Sheet 1 (Lecture 1)

Transcription:

Overview - Previous lecture 1/2 Derived the wave equation with solutions of the form We found that the polarization of the material affects wave propagation, and found the dispersion relation ω(k) with the corresponding refractive index given by (approximately because: ignores magnetization, assumes low frequency) slide 1

Overview - Previous lecture 2/2 Found that polarization of materials (atoms) has finite response time Harmonic fields will give harmonic response, but with finite phase lag electric susceptibility must contain imaginary contribution: This in turn implied that the refractive index contains an imaginary component which was found to lead to a complex wavevector that describes attenuation α In short: finite polarization response time (related to n) refractive index n(ω) must be linked to attenuation α(ω) slide 2 attenuation

Overview - Today s lecture Derive Kramers-Kronig relations linking - real refractive index n to an absorption spectrum α - real susceptibility X to a spectrum of the imaginary susceptibility X - a phase shift upon reflection ϕ to a reflectivity spectrum R slide 3

A simple truth and an essential trick! X(t) doesn t change if you multiply it by a step function : This has implications about the symmetry of the frequency dependence (Fourier Tr.) slide 4

A simple consequence and some simple math If then also with the Fourier transform of X(t), given by If you delve deep into your memory for Fourier theory, you ll remember (yes?) where the symbol denotes convolution, which is defined as: slide 5

The starting point We now have found the relation The left side of the equation is simply given by In the following slides, we will work out the right side of the equation. First: look at, then convolute with slide 6

Fourier transform of the step function around t=0 described by finite cosine amplitude at zero frequency described by opposite Fourier amplitude for ω and -ω infinite collection of sines with weighing factor. Note that sine waves have the correct symmetry around t=0 slide 7

Getting ready to convolute We now have and as well as the relation we ll now write this convolution in terms of the known Fourier components above slide 8

Convolute! Using the known Fourier components, we find is equal to which we can split into two components one relating to the real part of F[Θ(t)] and one related to the imaginary part of F[Θ(t)] : which we can in turn write as slide 9

Mixing the ingredients Using the result derived on the previous slide, we found that the relation corresponds to the relation which after some serious math magically turns into Time to scratch your head! Taking an infinite integral of X with a frequency dependent imaginary weighing factor gives you X again! we can link imaginary parts of X to real parts of X and vice versa slide 10

Separating imaginary and real parts Final steps: with and we find that Grouping real and imaginary terms yields These Kramers-Kronig relations for X(ω) relate X (ω) to X (ω) and vice versa slide 11

Rewrite to positive frequencies only Reality condition: X (ω) is an even function, X (ω) is an odd function This allows Kramers-Kronig relations to be written as : (see homework) Note that these integrals run over positive angular frequencies only slide 12

Simplifications for dilute media Previously we derived the frequency dependent complex refractive index: For dilute media or weak susceptibility : X and X are small. Using the approximation for small x this leads to Comparing real and imaginary terms respectively, this gives and We also derived so slide 13

Kramers-Kronig relations for n and α With and the relation can be written as One can get the frequency dependent refractive index from an absorption spectrum We simplified the math by assuming dilute media, but the result is true in general! slide 14

Example for a single absorption line 1/3 To get n(ω) at a specific frequency, integrate the entire absorption spectrum with a frequency dependent weighing factor 1/(ω 2 -ω 2 ) 4 0-4 absorption band Here: example for ω = 0.9 y=1/(ω 2 2 0.9-0.9 2 2 )) α(ω') 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 If ω < ω res then: Below ω α small and positive weighing factor negative small negative contribution Above ω α large and positive weighing factor positive large positive contribution ω'/ω res For frequencies below resonance, KK relations yield large n(ω) slide 15

Example for a single absorption line 2/3 To get n(ω) at a specific frequency, integrate the entire absorption spectrum with a frequency dependent weighing factor 1/(ω 2 -ω 2 ) 4 0-4 absorption band y=1/(ω 22 1.1-1.1 2 ) α(ω') 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 If ω > ω res then: Below ω α large and positive weighing factor negative large negative contribution Above ω α small and positive weighing factor positive small positive contribution ω'/ω res For frequencies above resonance, KK relations yield small n(ω) slide 16

Example for a single absorption line 3/3 Repeating this integration for many ω yields n(ω): 4 0-4 50 [n(ω) - 1] α(ω') 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 ω'/ω res Between resonances: n slowly increases = normal dispersion Close to resonances: n rapidly decreases = anomalous dispersion At high frequencies (~ x-ray wavelengths) n can become slightly smaller than 1 slide 17

A quicker but less intuitive route - Cauchy We can also use Cauchy s integral theorem to derive the KK relations for X(ω) This is equivalent to proving (with apologies for the parameter changes!) We will show this by solving the integral using Cauchy s integral theorem slide 18

Integrating in the complex plane Cauchy s integral theorem ( CIT ): the closed path integral of an analytic function yields zero. (with some caveats) More info, see e.g. MathWorld http://mathworld.wolfram.com/cauchyintegraltheorem.html = 0 1 c 2 3 1 2 3 + + = 0 If we make ω complex, the CIT still holds. We now have a closed path of which - the value of the integrand goes to zero for large ω - the integration is tricky around Ω - the integration is over real frequencies and very familiar looking.. slide 19

Integration at large values of ω = 0 c Half-circle section: the value of the integrand goes to zero for large ω = 0 This can be seen by looking at X(ω) at fixed complex and large ω goes to zero For large real part of ω, this term oscillates fast over small Δt slide 20

Integration around a pole That leaves us with + = 0 c = 0 We can calculate the small path integral around Ω using the residue theorem: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/residuetheorem.html (the essential step) where is the vanishingly small length of the half circle around Ω That leaves us with = slide 21

The final result 2 3 We have found - = 3 2 We found: integration over real ω (except small region) = We set out to prove: ~ DONE! It turns out that avoiding the infinitely small section around omega is reasonable (recall the example integrations earlier this lecture) slide 22

Kramers-Kronig relations relating reflectivity to phase shift 1/3 A light wave incident on a planar surface of a dispersive material generates a reflected wave with a frequency dependent amplitude and phase shift The fraction of reflected irradiance scales with the reflectance R: with r(ω) the amplitude reflection coefficient: Note that for a low absorption situation (e.g. glass at visible frequencies) this gives: slide 23

Kramers-Kronig relations relating reflectivity to phase shift 2/3 It is difficult to measure ϕ vs. ω, but we can derive a KK relation for ϕ and R First step: express r(ω) as a complex exponent: We want to arrive at a relation of the form with X of the form X + i X (this linked the X integral to X and vice versa) To enable this, we will derive a KK relation for ln (r(ω) ) slide 24

Kramers-Kronig relations relating reflectivity to phase shift 3/3 Using the Cauchy Integral Theorem and the residue theorem we find The latter integral can be (see handouts) written in the form we can find the frequency dependent phase shift upon reflection by measuring a reflection spectrum! slide 25

Summary - Today s lecture Using reality condition OR Cauchy, found Kramers-Kronig relations linking - real refractive index n to an absorption spectrum α - real susceptibility X to a spectrum of the imaginary susceptibility X - a phase shift upon reflection ϕ to a reflectivity spectrum R slide 26

Next week Show that oscillating electrons radiate, and show that this can slow down light microscopic view of refractive index Low frequency Amplitude in phase with E in Lecture 5: model dipole radiation Lecture 6: derive simple model for oscillating dipoles (Lorentz model) slide 27