Potsdam Propeller Test Case (PPTC) Test Case Description

Similar documents
ITTC Propeller Benchmark

ENGR 4011 Resistance & Propulsion of Ships Assignment 4: 2017

ITTC Propeller Benchmark

Numerical and Experimental Characterization of a CP Propeller Unsteady Cavitation at Different Pitch Settings

Numerical Analysis of Unsteady Open Water Characteristics of Surface Piercing Propeller

Influence of Flow Transition on Open and Ducted Propeller Characteristics

Propeller Loads of Large Commercial Vessels at Crash Stop

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines Testing and Extrapolation Methods Propulsion, Performance Propulsion Test

Analysis of Crashback Forces Compared with Experimental Results

Offshore Hydromechanics Module 1

CFD Analysis of a Propeller Flow and Cavitation

ITTC Recommended Procedures

Resistance and Propulsion

DDES of Wetted and Cavitating Marine Propeller for CHA Underwater Noise Assessment

Numerical calculations of the hydrodynamic performance of the contra-rotating propeller (CRP) for high speed vehicle

Cavitation of a Propeller and Influence of a Wake Equalizing Duct

Fan Stage Broadband Noise Benchmarking Programme

Full scale thruster performance and load determination based on numerical simulations

Large Eddy Simulation of Crashback in Marine Propellers

Performance evaluation of composite marine propeller using L 8 orthogonal array

Aerodynamic Performance 1. Figure 1: Flowfield of a Wind Turbine and Actuator disc. Table 1: Properties of the actuator disk.

On the advanced extrapolation method for a new type of podded propulsor via CFD simulations and model measurements

Reliability assessment of ship powering performance extrapolations using Monte Carlo methods

ADVANCES IN FULL-SCALE WAKE-FIELD PREDICTIONS AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROPELLER DESIGN

DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE. October 13-14, Thrusters. Voith Schneider Propeller - An Efficient Propulsion System for DP Controlled Vessels

Numerical Investigation of a Cavitating Model Propeller Including Compressible Shock Wave Dynamics

Introduction to Turbomachinery

Propeller Analysis Using RANS/BEM Coupling Accounting for Blade Blockage

CHAPTER 4 OPTIMIZATION OF COEFFICIENT OF LIFT, DRAG AND POWER - AN ITERATIVE APPROACH

IDENTIFICATION OF SHIP PROPELLER TORSIONAL VIBRATIONS

Propeller geometry optimization for pressure pulses reduction: an analysis of the influence of the rake distribution

λ (1) optimization, blade element momentum theory Abstract The objectives of this contribution is an enhanced

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

A Study on Effects of Blade Pitch on the Hydrodynamic Performances of a Propeller by Using CFD

Transactions on the Built Environment vol 11, 1995 WIT Press, ISSN

Two medium size cavitation tunnel hydro-acoustic benchmark experiment comparisons as part of a round robin test campaign

A New Implementation of Vortex Lattice Method Applied to the Hydrodynamic Performance of the Propeller-Rudder

Investigation of Reynolds Number Scale Effects on Propeller Tip Vortex Cavitation and Propeller-Induced Hull Pressure Fluctuations

Analysis of Unsteady Propeller Blade Forces by RANS

CFD Analysis of Scale Effects on Conventional and Tip-Modified Propellers

APPLICATION OF ENERGY SAVING FINS ON RUDDERS

Performance Investigation of Ducted Aerodynamic Propulsors

Turbine Blade Design of a Micro Gas Turbine

7.2 Ship Drive Train and Power

voith.com Precise and safe maneuvering Voith Schneider Propeller

Yiran Su 1, Seungnam Kim 1, Weikang Du 1, Spyros A. Kinnas 2, Mikael Grekula 3, Jan Hallander 3, Da- Qing Li 3

Numerical Investigation of the Hydrodynamic Performances of Marine Propeller

Rate-Dependent Hydroelastic Response of Self-Adaptive Composite Propellers in Fully Wetted and Cavitating Flows

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

Comparison of experimental measurements and numerical calculations for a propeller in axial cylinder

Facilities: CHL (Computational Hydrodynamics Laboratory) in ECJ 8.502

Interactive Program System for the Design/Analysis of Marine Propulsors

Nominal vs. Effective Wake Fields and Their Influence on Propeller Cavitation Performance

Unsteady Analysis of a Horizontal Axis Marine Current Turbine in Yawed Inflow Conditions With a Panel Method

Prediction of Propeller Blade Stress Distribution Through FEA

Lecture-10 Tutorial -2 Solved Problems and Tutorial Problems On Three Dimensional flow in Axial Flow Compressor

AN EXPLORATORY STUDY ON THE WORKING PRINCIPLES OF ENERGY SAVING DEVICES (ESDS) PIV, CFD INVESTIGATIONS AND ESD DESIGN GUIDELINES

Contents. 1 Introduction to Gas-Turbine Engines Overview of Turbomachinery Nomenclature...9

Numerical Analysis of Azimuth Propulsor Performance in Seaways: Influence of Oblique Inflow and Free Surface

Performance Assessment of the Waterjet Propulsion System through a Combined Analytical and Numerical Approach

Cavitating Flow Calculations for the E779A Propeller in Open Water and Behind Conditions: Code Comparison and Solution Validation

Middle East Technical University Department of Mechanical Engineering ME 305 Fluid Mechanics I Fall 2018 Section 4 (Dr.

An Extrapolation Method Suitable for Scaling of Propellers of any Design

Efficient Prediction of Crashback Performance of Controllable Pitch Propellers

On predicting the sound from a cavitating marine propeller in a tunnel

Analysis of Wind Turbine Pressure Distribution and 3D Flows Visualization on Rotating Condition

Machinery Requirements for Polar Class Ships

Numerical Investigation of the Impact of SES-Waterjet Interactions and Flow Non-uniformity on Pump Performance

ENGR 4011 Resistance & Propulsion of Ships Assignment 5: A dimensional analysis of propeller thrust starting with the functional expression

Experiments with Podded Propulsors in Static Azimuthing Conditions

Simulation-driven Design of a Rim Drive for an Autonomous Vehicle

Deliverable D.6.1. Application of CFD tools to the development of a novel propulsion concept


Performance Characteristics of Static and Dynamic Azimuthing Podded Propulsor

An Overview of Impellers, Velocity Profile and Reactor Design

Investigation on the influence of scaling effects in propeller testing through the use of theoretical prediction codes

A simplified model for a small propeller with different airfoils along the blade

Rotor reference axis

Marine Propulsors. Design Methodology for Subcavitating. Archief

Modeling of Cavitating Flow through Waterjet Propulsors

Measurement of Axial Thrust Number in Various Agitation Flow Regimes

Interactive Optimization Programs for Initial Propeller Design

Teaching sessions week 40

Lect-36. In this lecture... Tutorial on radial flow turbines. Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay

DUAL-MODE CONTRAPROPELLER WITH CURVE STACKING LINE FOR BLADE

Hydro-Structure Analysis of Composite Marine Propeller under Pressure Hydrodynamic Loading

Chapter three. Two-dimensional Cascades. Laith Batarseh

Study of the Losses in Fluid Machinery with the Help of Entropy

FEDSM AERODYNAMIC NOISE SIMULATION OF PROPELLER FAN BY LARGE EDDY SIMULATION

Contents. 2 Basic Components Aerofoils Force Generation Performance Parameters xvii

Makoto Uchida. Yuuki Matsumoto

Dynamic Analysis of Composite Propeller of Ship using FEA P. NARASAIAH 1, PROF. S.S. BASARKOD 2

Scaling of Tip Vortex Cavitation Inception for a Marine Open Propeller

ROLLER BEARING FAILURES IN REDUCTION GEAR CAUSED BY INADEQUATE DAMPING BY ELASTIC COUPLINGS FOR LOW ORDER EXCITATIONS

Dynamometry Tutorial IMECE

3D hot-wire measurements of a wind turbine wake

Cavitation instabilities in hydraulic machines

Drag and Torque on Locked Screw Propeller

Transcription:

Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors smp 11, Hamburg, Germany, June 2011 Workshop: Propeller performance Potsdam Propeller Test Case (PPTC) Test Case Description Ulf Barkmann 1, Hans-Jürgen Heinke 1, Lars Lübke 1 1 SVA, Potsdam Model Basin, Germany 1 AIM OF WORKSHOP The purpose of the workshop is in-force the development of numerical methods for calculation of the performance of marine propulsors in cavitating and non-cavitating flows. The high demand for improving the accuracy and the quality of the numerical methods should be assess by providing high qualitative and intensive experimental validation data. The SVA Potsdam GmbH supported the smp organisation committee in monitoring the performance and accuracy of available numerical methods by offering test and validation data for a controllable pitch propeller SVA-VP1304. The test results are published in course of the propeller workshop of the Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors 2011 (smp 11). The geometry and results of the propeller are presented under the name PPTC, an acronym for Potsdam Propeller Test Case. The experimental results were unknown for the participants of the workshop. The experimental investigation includes open water test, velocity field measurements and cavitation tests. Different operation conditions were investigated. A detailed description of the open water tests conducted at the towing tank of the SVA is presented in the SVA report 3752 [1], which can be down loaded from the website (sva-potsdam.de). 2 GEOMETRY OF THE POTSDAM PROPELLER TEST CASE The propeller is a controllable pitch propeller. This affects the propeller blade design near the hub and results in a 0.3 mm gap between hub and the root of the propeller blade near the leading and trailing edge. The hub cap and aft fairing where designed according to the 22 nd ITTC (1999) proceedings. The gap between aft fairing and hub has a width of 3 mm. Also a dummy hub, having the same dimensions and mass as the propeller hub, was manufactured. The main data of the propeller is given in Table 1. The propeller geometry can be down loaded from the website (sva-potsdam.de). 3 EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS 3.1 Open Water Performance 3.1.1 Test Conditions The propeller is investigated in a pull configuration in the towing tank of the SVA. For the open water tests the dynamometer H39 from Kempf & Remmers has been used. During the tests the propeller shaft is submerged by 1.5 D. Measurements with a dummy hub were conducted, in order to get data of the idle torque, the force in the gap between the hub and the aft fairing and the resistance of the hub cap. The open water tests were carried out at two different numbers of revolutions to evaluate the dependency on the Reynolds number. However for the evaluation of the computational results solely the tests with n = 15 s -1 are taken into account. The details of experimental setup and test conditions are given in table 2 and 3. 3.1.2 Requested Computations It was requested to calculate the open water characteristics of the propeller for the advanced coefficients J = 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 and 1.4. The computations should be conducted according to the operation conditions given in Table 4. The thrust and torque of the propeller should be made dimensionless employing the rate of revolution n, the propeller diameter D and the density of water as follows: Advance coefficient Thrust coefficient Torque coefficient VA J n D K T K Q T n Q n 2 D 4 2 D 5

Open water efficiency 0 J K 2 K T Q The axial velocities are defined positive in flow direction, the radial velocities for increasing radii and the tangential velocities in direction of rotation. with V A being the advance speed, T the thrust and Q the propeller torque 3.1.3 Open Water Test Results The measured values in the open water tests were corrected with the values of the idle torque and the gap force. The measured and corrected open water characteristics for the five requested advance coefficients are given in Table 4 for the number of revolutions n = 15 s -1. 3.2 Velocity Field 3.2.1 Test Conditions The velocity field was measured by means of LDV in the cavitation tunnel K 15 A (Kempf & Remmers) of the SVA Potsdam, utilising a test section with the length of 2600 mm and a cross section of 600x600 mm. The dynamometer J25 from Kempf & Remmers was arranged in front of the propeller model. The shaft inclination was zero degrees. A 2D-LDV measuring system from TSI was used for the velocity measurements. Angular based measurements of the transient flow field behind the rotating propeller operating in homogeneous inflow were carried out. Special attention was laid upon resolving the tip vortex. The velocity field around the model propeller VP1304 was measured in seven planes x/d = -0.2, 0.094, 0.10, 0.11, 0.13, 0.16 and 0.20, with respect to the propeller plane as shown in Table 5. One revolution of the propeller was resolved within 1440 angle classes, giving an angular resolution of 0.25. The resolution in radial direction is shown in Table 6. All measurements were conducted for the same working point, given in Table 7. The test conditions are given in Table 8. The LDV measurements were carried out along a line of constant angular position = 225. The data is than related to the zero degree position, being defined as the 12 o clock position. The tests were conducted with a non-cavitating propeller. Test results are summarized in in SVA report [2]. 3.2.2 Requested Computations It was requested to calculate the velocity field around the propeller for the working point and test conditions given in Table 4 and 5. The calculations should be conducted according to the thrust identity. Four different evaluations were requested. The velocity distribution should be provided on three different radii each for two planes located 0.1 and 0.2 propeller diameters behind the propeller plane, see Table 9. The velocity components for Case 2.2.1-2.2.3 shall be made dimensionless by means of the inflow velocity, as follows 1-(V x /V A ), V t /V A and V r /V A. 3.3 Cavitation 3.3.1 Test Conditions The cavitation tests were conducted in the cavitation tunnel K 15 A (Kempf & Remmers) of the SVA Potsdam. For the tests a test section with the length of 2600 mm and a cross section of 600 x 600 mm was used. The dynamometer J25 from Kempf & Remmers was arranged in front of the propeller model. The shaft inclination was zero degrees. The propeller characteristic in the cavitation tunnel had been measured at the numbers of revolutions n = 15, 20 and 25 s -1. Cavitation buckets were measured with the number of revolutions n = 25 s -1. Two blades had been selected for the cavitation tests. The cavitation behaviour of the propeller was observed in three working points, corresponding to the test conditions required for test case 2.3.1-2.3.3. Test results are summarized in SVA report [3]. 3.3.2 Requested Computations It was requested to calculate the propeller cavitation for three working point, given in Table 10. The calculation shall be conducted according to the thrust identity. For the three working points it was requested to visualize the cavity surface for vapor fractions of 20, 50 and 80%. For case 2.3.1 and case 2.3.2 it was requested to look upon the suction side, while for case 2.3.3 on the pressure side of the propeller. In order to quantify the thrust deduction it was additionally requested to provide the thrust coefficient of the propeller in cavitating condition. It was also requested to provide the pressure distribution, made dimensionless with the section advance speed, on the propeller radii r/r = 0.7, 0.97 and 1.00 with and without cavitation. The data is made dimensionless as follows: Cavitation number with respect to n: n Pressure coefficient: c P pv 2 p 0. 5 nd p p0 2 0. 5 V 2 n r with D P being the propeller diameter, T the propeller thrust, Q the propeller torque, p the tunnel pressure, p v the vapour pressure, p 0 the static pressure and r the radius. 2

REFERENCES [1]Barkmann, U., Potsdam Propeller Test Case (PPTC) - Open Water Tests with the Model Propeller VP1304, Report 3752, Schiffbau- Versuchsanstalt Potsdam, April 2011 [2]Mach, K., Potsdam Propeller Test Case (PPTC), LDV with the Model Propeller VP1304, Report 3754, Schiffbau-Versuchsanstalt Potsdam, April 2011 (unpublished) [3]Heinke, H.-J., Potsdam Propeller Test Case (PPTC), Cavitation Tests with the Model Propeller VP1304, Report 3753, Schiffbau- Versuchsanstalt Potsdam, April 2011

TABLES Table 1: Main data of model propeller VP1304 VP1304 Diameter D [m] 0.250 Pitch ratio r/r = 0.7 P 0.7 /D [ ] 1.635 Area ratio A E /A 0 [ ] 0.77896 Chord length r/r = 0.7 c 0.7 [m] 0.10417 Skew θ EXT [ ] 18.837 Hub ratio d h /D [ ] 0.300 Number of blades Z [ ] 5 Sense of rotation [ ] right Type [ ] controllable pitch propeller PPTC Towing tank Table 2: Details of model tests Dimensions of towing tank 280 x 9 x 4.5 m Propeller: Propeller type Material of model propeller Diameter of the propeller Sense of rotation VP1304 controllable pitch propeller brass 0.25 m right (looking on pressure side) Arrangement: Shaft inclination 0 Dynamometer shaft behind the propeller Measuring equipment: dynamometer H39 n max = 60 s -1 T max = 1 kn Q max = 50 Nm

Table 3: Operation conditions Water density (t W = 17.5 C) [kg/m³] 998.67 Kinematic viscosity (t W = 17.5 C) [m²/s] 1.070E-06 Number of revolutions n [1/s] 15.00 Table 4: Measured open water characteristics (by polynomials) J K T 10K Q η O 0.60 0.6288 1.3964 0.4300 0.80 0.5100 1.1780 0.5512 1.00 0.3994 0.9749 0.6520 1.20 0.2949 0.7760 0.7258 1.40 0.1878 0.5588 0.7487 Table 5: LDV Measuring planes x-position x/d [ ] -0.200 0.094 0.100 0.110 0.130 0.160 0.200 x-position x [mm] -50.0 23.5 25.0 27.5 32.5 40.0 50.0 Table 6: LDV Positions of the measuring points measuring plane start radius end radius distance r/r r/r r/r [mm] in front of the propeller x/d = -0.20 0.40 1.10 0.050 6.250 0.40 0.70 0.050 6.250 behind the propeller x/d = 0.094, 0.10, 0.11, 0.13, 0.16, 0.20 0.70 0.90 0.025 3.125 0.90 0.95 0.010 1.250 0.95 1.05 0.002 0.250 1.05 1.10 0.025 3.125 Table 7: Working point for the LDV measurements Inflow speed V A [m/s] 7.204 Number of revolutions n [s -1 ] 23 Advance coefficient J [ ] 1.253 Thrust coefficient K T [ ] 0.250 Torque coefficient 10K Q [ ] 0.725 Water density (for t w = 24.7 C) [kg/m 3 ] 997.1 Kinematic viscosity of water (for t w = 24.7 C) [m²/s] 0.903E-6

Table 8: Test conditions for the LDV measurements Water density (for t w = 24.7 C) [kg/m 3 ] 997.1 Kinematic viscosity of water (for t w = 24.7 C) [m²/s] 0.903E-6 Table 9: Requested Computations r/r [-] x/d [-] [ ] Case 2.2.1 0.70 0.1, 0.2-50 - 22 Case 2.2.2 0.97 0.1, 0.2-50 - 22 Case 2.2.3 1.00 0.1, 0.2-50 - 22 Case 2.2.4 0.40-1.10 0.1, 0.2 Table 10: Working points for the cavitation tests Case 2.3.1 Case 2.3.2 Case 2.3.3 Advanced coefficient J [-] 1.019 1.269 1.408 Cavitation number based on n n [-] 2.024 1.424 2.000 Thrust coefficient (non-cavitating!) K T [-] 0.387 0.245 0.167 Number of revolutions n [1/s] 24.987 24.986 25.014 Water density (for t w = 23.2 C) [kg/m 3 ] 997.44 997.44 997.37 Kinematic viscosity water (for [m²/s] 9.337 10-7 9.337 10-7 9.272 10-7 t w = 23.2 C) Vapour pressure (for t w = 23.2 C) p v [Pa] 2818 2818 2869 Air content / s [%] 53.5 53.5 58.50