RNA/DNA ratios used to study growth in coastal nursery areas Comparison of methods and relation with environment Maarten Rutting, Richard Crooijmans, Ralf van Hal & Ingrid Tulp
Living below sea level... 2
Regular nourishments since 1991 3
Sand nourishments and nurseries
Impact on nursery function? Knowledge on the impact: Benthic community restores within a year after sand nourishment Effects on fish community? Effects on the nursery function? =>fish growth?
June 2017: multidisciplinary survey Wageningen Marine Research Multidisciplinary survey Animal Breeding & Genetics Richard Crooijmans MSC Maarten Rutting: Fish growth RNA/DNA 6
Locations Location 1: Zuid-Holland Location 2: Noord-Holland Location 3: Texel Location 4: Ameland =>4 consecutive weeks from South to North
Transects: fish sampling Transects per location Fish sampling: 0-1 m: walking push net 2-3 m: dinghy: 2 m beam 3-10 m: vessel 3 m beam Stratification based on sediment Continuous recording abiotics Benthos sampling 8
Aim MSc project compare methods to measure ratio s Investigate growth juvenile flatfish in June in nurseries along the Dutch coast Growth ~ related to abiotic factors? Relation with sand nourishments: role of sediment?
Survey - Benthos
Survey - Sediment
Survey - Fish
Tissue collection starting points For tissue collection: Directions from Benjamin Ciotti (thanks!) For isolation: Protocol and Guide for Estimating Nucleic Acids in Larval Fish Using a Fluorescence Microplate Reader (Caldarone, et al., 2001)
RNA/DNA Quantification: two methods Ethidium bromide Qubit Fluorometer Already used before to analyse ratio s Using RNA High Sensitivity Assay Kit (Invitrogen ) dsdna High Sensitivity Assay Kit (Invitrogen )
RNA/DNA Quantification Add RNAse + Add Ethidium Incubation 30 min bromide Measure #1 Measure #2 Calculate fluorescence for DNA Quantify RNA and DNA Add Qubit DNA- and RNA dye Incubation 2 min Measure Qubit Quantifies RNA and DNA + Correction for sample input
600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Qubit range Ideally maximum amount of sample (20 µl) Schematic overview of the Qubit range measurements should fall in the middle of the range Possible for DNA Not possible for RNA Ø Dilution required Fluorescence 0 200 400 600 Concentration (ng/ml)
Dilution effect Using less sample volume: bias in the result Correction needed for diluting Dilution series to produce corrections for diluting Calculated Qubit RNA ng µl -1 25 20 15 10 5 0 Dilution direction 0 10 20 Sample in Qubit (µl)
Method comparison 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ethidium Bromide Qubit Qubit 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 Ethidium Bromide
Location differences Plaice Dab Sole 1 2 3 4 Location 1 2 3 4 Location 1 2 3 4 Location N: 76 120 109 87 N: 48 103 74 77 N: 17 33 23 5
Factors considered Temperature Salinity Depth Tidal phase Location Sediment grain size <- No results yet Density of benthic prey <- No results yet Density of shore crab Density of large common shrimp (+30 mm) Density of flatfish (highly correlated with shore crab)
RNA/DNA~fish length Plaice R 2 = 0.000231 p = 0.76 Dab R 2 = 0.232 p = 5.6e-19 Sole R 2 = 0.333 p = 2.6e-08 0 5 10 15 20 Length (cm) 0 5 10 15 20 Length (cm) 0 5 10 15 20 Length (cm) locations: 1 (ο) 2 ( ) 3 (+) 4 ( )
RNA/DNA~fish length Dab 0-group R 2 = 0.199 p = 1.8e-10 Dab R 2 = 0.232 p = 5.6e-19 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Length (cm) 0 5 10 15 20 Length (cm) locations: 1 (ο) 2 ( ) 3 (+) 4 ( )
RNA/DNA~salinity Plaice R 2 = 0.0148 p = 0.016 Dab R 2 = 0.239 p = 1.5e-19 Sole R 2 = 0.015 p = 0.28 28 30 32 34 36 Salinity (ppt) 28 30 32 34 36 Salinity (ppt) 28 30 32 34 36 Salinity (ppt) locations: 1 (ο) 2 ( ) 3 (+) 4 ( )
Preliminary analysis factor plaice dab dab 0 group sole fish length ns - + - temperature - - ns ns salinity - + + ns water visibility - ns ns ns density shore crab - ns ns ns density large brown shrimp ns - ns ns Locations (factor) ns s s ns
Discussion Qubit suitable to measure RNA/DNA range RNA high sensitivity kit too limited to accurately quantify RNA in fastest growing juveniles =>Solution: Qubit RNA Broad Range Assay Kit Seasonal effect ~ location effect Variation in RNA/DNA related to several (a)biotic factors Negative effect epibenthic predators Location and salinity confounding Relation with sediment: still too be included in analysis 25
Future work Include sediment data Refine Qubit method Next step: collecting fish later in the year, when food becomes limiting and growth is reduced
Thanks for listening Questions (not too technical J) 27
Discussion: Qubit vs Ethidium bromide Pros: Measure both DNA and RNA Easy to use, less steps involved that influence outcome No enzymatic steps required safer to use and requires less training possible to use the kits with a Fluorometric plate reader Cons: range RNA high sensitivity kit too limited to accurately quantify RNA in fastest growing juveniles =>Solution: Qubit RNA Broad Range Assay Kit RNA quantification is sensitive to dilution 28
Shore crab Density Plaice R 2 = 0.052 p = 5.1e-06 Dab R 2 = 0.00339 p = 0.31 Sole R 2 = 0.13 p = 0.0012 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 Shore crab m 2 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 Shore crab m 2 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 Shore crab m 2 locations: 1 (ο) 2 ( ) 3 (+) 4 ( )
RNA/DNA~temperature Plaice R 2 = 0.011 p = 0.038 Dab R 2 = 0.0532 p = 5.2e-05 Sole R 2 = 0.0961 p = 0.0054 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Temperature ( C) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Temperature ( C) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Temperature ( C) locations: 1 (ο) 2 ( ) 3 (+) 4 ( )