Math 225A: Differential Topology, Homework 4

Similar documents
DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY AND THE POINCARÉ-HOPF THEOREM

Math Topology II: Smooth Manifolds. Spring Homework 2 Solution Submit solutions to the following problems:

Transversality. Abhishek Khetan. December 13, Basics 1. 2 The Transversality Theorem 1. 3 Transversality and Homotopy 2

Math 225A: Differential Topology, Final Exam

Differential Topology Solution Set #3

BROUWER FIXED POINT THEOREM. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 1 3. Brouwer fixed point theorem 3 Acknowledgments 8 References 8

Notes on Differential Topology

THE JORDAN-BROUWER SEPARATION THEOREM

Math 147, Homework 5 Solutions Due: May 15, 2012

M4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1

Math 225B: Differential Geometry, Final

Math 147, Homework 6 Solutions Due: May 22, 2012

LECTURE 11: TRANSVERSALITY

1 )(y 0) {1}. Thus, the total count of points in (F 1 (y)) is equal to deg y0

Theorem 3.11 (Equidimensional Sard). Let f : M N be a C 1 map of n-manifolds, and let C M be the set of critical points. Then f (C) has measure zero.

Differential Geometry qualifying exam 562 January 2019 Show all your work for full credit

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

Math 141 Final Exam December 18, 2014

We have the following immediate corollary. 1

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

Integration and Manifolds

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

(FALL 2011) 225A - DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY FINAL < HOPF DEGREE THEOREM >

Math 215B: Solutions 3

Real Analysis Prelim Questions Day 1 August 27, 2013

Math 147, Homework 1 Solutions Due: April 10, 2012

THE EXISTENCE PROBLEM

Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press

THE POINCARE-HOPF THEOREM

225A DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY FINAL

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE

Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds

The Borsuk-Ulam Theorem

A fixed point theorem for smooth extension maps

Cup product and intersection

1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces

DEVELOPMENT OF MORSE THEORY

Differentiable Topology and Geometry

INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREM and SURFACES IN R n

April 13, We now extend the structure of the horseshoe to more general kinds of invariant. x (v) λ n v.

i = f iα : φ i (U i ) ψ α (V α ) which satisfy 1 ) Df iα = Df jβ D(φ j φ 1 i ). (39)

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday 10 February 2004 (Day 1)

DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY: MORSE THEORY AND THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC

MATH 115A: SAMPLE FINAL SOLUTIONS

The theory of manifolds Lecture 2

MATH 23b, SPRING 2005 THEORETICAL LINEAR ALGEBRA AND MULTIVARIABLE CALCULUS Midterm (part 1) Solutions March 21, 2005

Inner Product, Length, and Orthogonality

Lecture 11 Hyperbolicity.

Local strong convexity and local Lipschitz continuity of the gradient of convex functions

Lecture Notes for MA455 Manifolds

Analysis III Complex Analysis Hints for solution for the 1. Exercise Sheet

10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann

Cutting and pasting. 2 in R. 3 which are not even topologically

f(x) f(z) c x z > 0 1

Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds

Foliations of Three Dimensional Manifolds

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 16-17, JULY 14-17

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday September 21, 2004 (Day 1)

COMPUTABILITY AND THE GROWTH RATE OF SYMPLECTIC HOMOLOGY

Lecture 2. x if x X B n f(x) = α(x) if x S n 1 D n

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

Degree of circle maps and Sard s theorem.

Differential Topology Final Exam With Solutions

SARD S THEOREM ALEX WRIGHT

MATH 547 ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 4

Equivariant cohomology of infinite-dimensional Grassmannian and shifted Schur functions

7. Let X be a (general, abstract) metric space which is sequentially compact. Prove X must be complete.

Math 637 Topology Paulo Lima-Filho. Problem List I. b. Show that a contractible space is path connected.

Homework 4: Mayer-Vietoris Sequence and CW complexes

INTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY, MATH 141, PRACTICE PROBLEMS

Bordism and the Pontryagin-Thom Theorem

LECTURE 9: THE WHITNEY EMBEDDING THEOREM

Handlebody Decomposition of a Manifold

Part II. Algebraic Topology. Year

FIRST ASSIGNMENT. (1) Let E X X be an equivalence relation on a set X. Construct the set of equivalence classes as colimit in the category Sets.

Polynomial mappings into a Stiefel manifold and immersions

Spectral Theorem for Self-adjoint Linear Operators

Applications of Homotopy

Math 225B: Differential Geometry, Homework 8

LECTURE 5: SMOOTH MAPS. 1. Smooth Maps

INTRODUCTION TO DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY

Math 205C - Topology Midterm

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 2 Oct 2002

PICARD S THEOREM STEFAN FRIEDL

Algebraic Topology Exam 2006: Solutions

GEOMETRY OF SYMMETRIC POWERS OF COMPLEX DOMAINS. Christopher Grow

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP

The Inverse Function Theorem 1

The coincidence Nielsen number for maps into real projective spaces

1. Simplify the following. Solution: = {0} Hint: glossary: there is for all : such that & and

Introduction to Topology

LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM

LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY

LINEAR ALGEBRA BOOT CAMP WEEK 4: THE SPECTRAL THEOREM

SOME REMARKS ON THE TOPOLOGY OF HYPERBOLIC ACTIONS OF R n ON n-manifolds

DIFFERENTIABLE CONJUGACY NEAR COMPACT INVARIANT MANIFOLDS

Ordinary Differential Equations II

1 z. = 2 w =. As a result, 1 + u 2. 2u 2. 2u u 2 ) = u is smooth as well., ϕ 2 ([z 1 : z 2 ]) = z 1

Math 209B Homework 2

1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups

Transcription:

Math 225A: Differential Topology, Homework 4 Ian Coley February 10, 2014 Problem 1.5.4. Let X and Z be transversal submanifolds of Y. Prove that if y X Z, then T y (X Z) = T y (X) T y (Z). Since X Z is itself a manifold and is contained in both X and Z we have T y (X Z) T y (X) and T y (X Z) T y (Z), hence we have the inclusion T y (X Z) T y (X) T y (Z). We claim that these spaces have the same dimension. Since X Z, codim(x Z) = codim X + codim Z. If dim Y = n, then we may write dim(x Z) = dim X + dim Z n. Therefore dim T y (X Z) = dim T y (X) + dim T y (Z) n. From linear algebra, we know that dim(t y (X) T y (Z)) = dim T y (X) + dim T y (Z) dim(t y (X) + T y (Z)). Again by transversality, we must have T y (X)+T y (Z) = T y (Y ), iso that dim(t y (X)+T y (z)) = n. Combining these, we have dim(t y (X) T y (Z)) = dim T y (X Z). Since these spaces have the same dimension and one includes the other, they must be equal. This completes the proof. Problem 1.5.5. Let f : X Y be a map transversal to a submanifold Z in Y. Then W = f 1 (Z) is a submanifold of X. Prove that T x (W ) is the preimage of T f(x) (Z) under the linear map Df x : T x (X) T f(x) (Y ). Consider f i : W Z, where i : W X is the inclusion map. Then f i is a diffeomorphism, so D(f i) x : T x (W ) T f(x) (Z) is an isomorphism of tangent spaces. Note that D(f i) x = Df i(x) Di x = Df x Di x. Since Di x : T x (W ) T x (X) is also the inclusion map, we see that T x (W ) is the preimage of T f(x) (Z) as required. 1

Problem 1.5.9. Let V be a vector space, and let be the diagonal of V V. For a linear map A : V V, consider the graph W = {(v, Av) : v V }. Show that W if and only if +1 is not an eigenvalue of A. Let dim V = n. If W, then T (v,w) (W )+T (v,w) ( ) = T (v,w) (V V ) at every (v, w) V V. Since we are working over vector spaces, this is equivalent to W + = V V. We see that W = {v V : Av = v}, i.e. the eigenspace of +1. Since W + = V V, we have dim V V = dim W + dim dim(w ). Since dim W = dim = n and dim V V = 2n, we must have dim(w ) = 0, i.e. A does not have an eigenspace of +1, so +1 is not an eigenvalue of A. Conversely, suppose that A does not have an eigenspace for +1. Then dim W + dim = 2n by the above equation, hence W + = V. Again, since we are working over vector spaces, this implies W. Problem 1.5.10. Let f : X X be a map with fixed point x. If +1 is not an eigenvalue of Df x : T x (X) T x (X), then x is called a Lefschetz fixed point of f. f is called a Lefschetz map if all its fixed points are Lefschetz. Prove that if X is compact and f is Lefschetz, then f has only finitely many fixed points. Using the results of the previous problem, we know that x is a Lefschetz fixed point if and only if graph f and (the diagonal) are transversal in X X. Again, as we saw above, this implies that dim(graph f ) = 0. The set we are interested in is precisely graph f, since this implies that (x, f(x)) = (x, x) i.e. f(x) = x. By earlier results, we have shown that a dimension zero compact manifold is exactly a finite number of isolated points, hence f may only have finitely many fixed points. Problem 1.6.1. Suppose that f 0, f 1 : X Y are homotopic. Show that there exists a homotopy F : X I Y such that F (x, t) = f 0 (x) for all t [0, 1 4 ], and f(x, t) = f 1 (x) for all t [ 3 4, 1]. We are guaranteed a smooth homotopy F : X I Y such that F (x, 0) = f 0 (x) and F (x, 1) = f 1 (x). Taking the hint, we will construct a smooth function ρ : R R manipulating t. We recall that we have created a bump function ρ (1.1.18) such that, for any a < b, { 0 x a ρ(x) = 1 x b with smooth interpolation in between. Let a = 1 and b = 3. Since the composition of 4 4 smooth functions are still smooth we define F = F (x, ρ(t)), which is smooth. It satisfies exactly what we want, so we are done. 2

Problem 1.6.2. Prove that homotopy is an equivalence relation (i.e. show transitivity). Suppose that f g and g h on X Y. Let H 0 : X I Y and H 1 : X I Y be these homotopies, respectively. We use the preceding problem here. Since the choice of 1 and 3 4 4 was arbitrary in 1.6.1, we know there exists H 0 such that H 0 (x, t) = f(x) for all t [0, 1] 5 and H 0 (x, t) = g(x) for all t [ 2, 1]. Further, there exists H 5 1 such that H 1 (x, t) = g(x) for all t [0, 3] and H 5 1 (x, t) = h(x) for all t [ 4, 1]. 5 We therefore can combine these into one homotopy. Define H 2 : X I Y by { H0 (x, t) t [0, 1 2 H 2 (x, t) = ] H 1 (x, t) t [ 1, 1]. 2 This is still a homotopy because H 0 and H 1 agree near t = 1/2, and the entire function is smooth and takes the appropriate values at t = 0 and t = 1. This completes the proof. Problem 1.6.6. Check that all contractible spaces are simply connected, but convince yourself that the converse is false. By 1.6.4, if X is contractible, then all maps from an arbitrary manifold Y X are homotopic. Therefore every map S 1 X is homotopic to the constant map from S 1 X, so X is simply connected. We showed in 1.7.6 (on the last homework) that S k is simply connected for k > 1. However, they are not contractible. Problem 1.6.7. Show that the antipodal map x x of S k S k is homotopic to the identity if k is odd. We will construct this antipodal map explicitly. Let k = 2n 1, where n 1. Consider S k C n = R 2n as the set of points {z = (z 1,..., z n ) : z = 1}, where z = z 1 2 + + z n 2, and z i is the usual complex norm. Consider the map F : S k I S k given by F ((z 1,..., z n ), t) = (e iπt z 1,..., e iπt z n ). This satisfies F (z, 0) = z and F (z, 1) = z. Further, it is smooth since e iπt is smooth and at any point t (0, 1), F (z, t) = e πit z = 1, so F stays on S k. Thus it is a homology between the identity and the antipodal map, so we are done. 3

Problem 2.1.8. Show that there are precisely two unit vectors in T x (X) that are perpendicular to T x ( X) and that one lies inside H x (X), the other outside. Denote the outward unit normal by n(x). Note that if X sits in R k, n(x) may be considered to be a map of X into R k. Prove that n is smooth. If x X, then there is a neighbourhood of x which is diffeomorphic to H k. The tangent space of T x ( X) is isomorphic to the hyperplane R k 1 H k. At any point, there are exactly two unit vectors orthogonal to the plane, since its codimension is 1. One of these vectors has x k < 0, which corresponds to the outward vector, and the other has x k > 0 which is the inward vector (taking G&P s definition of H k ). To see this is smooth, let γ : I H x (X) be a smooth arc lying inside a sufficiently small neighbourhood U of x with γ(0) = x. Then let ϕ(t) = Dγ t / Dγ t. By the chain rule, ϕ(t) is smooth and Dϕ t (0) is a preimage of n(x). Since the inclusion of X into R k is also smooth, n(x) : X U R k will also be a smooth map. Problem 2.1.9. (a) Show that X is a closed subset of X. (b) Find some examples in which X is compact but X is not. (a) We use the result of 2.1.11. Given that x may be given by f 1 (0) by a smooth function f, in particular f is continuous. Then X = f 1 (0) is closed since {0} R is closed. We may also see this by noting that the interior of X is open (since any point is covered by a chart). Since X = X \ int X = int X c, X is closed in X. (b) Let X = H 1. Then X = {0}, which is compact, but X itself is not. Problem 2.1.10. Let x X be a boundary point. Show that there exists a smooth nonnegative function f on some open neighbourhood U of x, such that f(z) = 0 if and only if z U, and if z U, then Df z (n(z)) < 0 (where n(z) is the unit outward normal vector). Let π : H k R be given by π(x 1,..., x k ) = x k. We adopt G&P s convention and define H k = {x R k : x k 0}. Then π 0 everywhere. Further, π(z) = 0 only when z H k. Let ϕ : U V H k be a chart around z X. Then let f : U R by f = π ϕ. Then f 0 and f(z) = 0 if and only if ϕ(z) H k if and only if z X. Since the derivative is linear, we know Df x (n(x)) < 0 if and only if Df z ( n(z)) > 0. Now, Df z = D(π ϕ) z = Dπ ϕ(z) Dϕ z. 4

We claim that Dϕ z ( n(z)) points inward into H k. To see this, we have for any curve satisfying γ(0) = z and γ (0) = n(z), Dϕ z ( n(z)) = lim t 0 ϕ(γ(t)) ϕ(γ(0)) t ϕ(γ(t)) ϕ(z) = lim. t 0 t Since ϕ(γ(t)) H k \ H k for all t and ϕ(z) H k. Since π is linear, Dπ ϕ(z) = π, so π(dϕ z ( n(z))) > 0 since Dϕ z ( n(z)) H k. This completes the proof. Problem 2.1.11. Show that if X is any manifold with boundary, then there exist a smooth nonnegative function f on X, with a regular value at 0, such that X = f 1 (0). Let U i be a locally finite cover of X, which is guaranteed to exist. Then by 2.1.9, we have functions f i : U 1 R such that f i 0 and f i (x) if and only if x U i. By locally finite, we may define f : X R by f = f i. Then by construction, f = 0 if and only if x U i = X, and f 0 in general. This completes the proof. 5