Other types of Movement

Similar documents
(7) a. [ PP to John], Mary gave the book t [PP]. b. [ VP fix the car], I wonder whether she will t [VP].

Ch. 2: Phrase Structure Syntactic Structure (basic concepts) A tree diagram marks constituents hierarchically

An introduction to German Syntax. 1. Head directionality: A major source of linguistic divergence

Quantification: Quantifiers and the Rest of the Sentence

Constituency. Doug Arnold

Features. An argument DP must have been assigned Case by S-structure. A Specifier of IP must have been occupied by something by S-structure.

Hierarchical and Linear Constraints on Structure

1. Background. Task: Determine whether a given string of words is a grammatical (well-formed) sentence of language L i or not.

Semantics and Generative Grammar. Quantificational DPs, Part 3: Covert Movement vs. Type Shifting 1

IBM Model 1 for Machine Translation

Spring 2017 Ling 620. An Introduction to the Semantics of Tense 1

CAS LX 523 Syntax II Spring 2001 March 13, (1) A qp. Kayne, Richard (1995). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

CAS LX 522 Syntax I Fall 2000 October 10, 2000 Week 5: Case Theory and θ Theory. θ-theory continued

THE DRAVIDIAN EXPERIENCER CONSTRUCTION AND THE ENGLISH SEEM CONSTRUCTION. K. A. Jayaseelan CIEFL, Hyderabad

C SC 620 Advanced Topics in Natural Language Processing. Lecture 21 4/13

Grundlagenmodul Semantik All Exercises

Spring 2018 Ling 620 The Basics of Intensional Semantics, Part 1: The Motivation for Intensions and How to Formalize Them 1

Intellectual Property of Mariamalia Hidalgo

Assignment 3. Solution. 1. Give trees showing the derivations of the following sentences; show all movements.

Intensionality. 1. Intensional Propositional Logic (IntPL).

Ling 240 Lecture #15. Syntax 4

Compositionality and Syntactic Structure Marcus Kracht Department of Linguistics UCLA 3125 Campbell Hall 405 Hilgard Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90095

Unterspezifikation in der Semantik Scope Semantics in Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammars

Biology: First year English Language Course 5 July 2018 Time allowed: 2 hours

X-bar theory. X-bar :

Time Zones - KET Grammar

2 A not-quite-argument for X-bar structure in noun phrases

Two Reconstruction Puzzles Yael Sharvit University of Connecticut

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English, Part 1: The Fragment of English

Hedging Your Ifs and Vice Versa

Intermediate Logic. Natural Deduction for TFL

Two Types of Remnant Movement. Gereon Müller IDS Mannheim February 10, 2001

Artificial Intelligence

Ling 98a: The Meaning of Negation (Week 5)

A Constraint on Remnant Movement

6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Tutorial:A Random Number of Coin Flips

Introduction to Semantics. The Formalization of Meaning 1

An Alternative Semantics for English Aspectual Particles

1 Reductions and Expressiveness

Extensions to the Logic of All x are y: Verbs, Relative Clauses, and Only

LECTURER: BURCU CAN Spring

Philosophy 244: #8 Counterfactuals, Neighborhood Semantics, Probability, Predicative Necessity, etc.

Iterated Galois connections in arithmetic and linguistics. J. Lambek, McGill University

Control and Tough- Movement

NP-Completeness I. Lecture Overview Introduction: Reduction and Expressiveness

CAS LX 500 Topics in Linguistics: Questions Spring 2006 March 2, b: Prosody and Japanese wh-questions

CAS LX 522 Syntax I November 4, 2002 Week 9: Wh-movement, supplement

STRUCTURAL NON-CORRESPONDENCE IN TRANSLATION

Control and Tough- Movement

WEATHER. Systematic ELD Unit Over view. Kindergarten Intermediate. Unit Goal. Unit Wrap Up Give advice. Language. Language, 3. Unit Assessment.

Parsing Beyond Context-Free Grammars: Tree Adjoining Grammars

18.01 Single Variable Calculus Fall 2006

Corso di Laurea in Biologia: Abilità Linguistiche 1 anno (A.A ) 17 luglio 2017 Tempo della prova: 2 ore

Sharpening the empirical claims of generative syntax through formalization

Spring 2017 Ling 620 Eliminating Res-Movement : An Introduction to Concept Generators

2013 ISSN: JATLaC Journal 8: t 1. t t Chomsky 1993 I Radford (2009) R I t t R I 2. t R t (1) (= R's (15), p. 86) He could have helped

TENSES. Tenses denote time of action. Time can be divided into three parts: Present Past and Future. Tense. Present. Classificati on of Tense

Probabilistic Context Free Grammars. Many slides from Michael Collins

Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, Predicate logic

Presuppositions (introductory comments)

Multiword Expression Identification with Tree Substitution Grammars

6.045: Automata, Computability, and Complexity (GITCS) Class 15 Nancy Lynch

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2015 Ling 720 Adnominal Tenses Redux: Thomas (2014) Nominal Tense and Temporal Implicatures

Recap: Lexicalized PCFGs (Fall 2007): Lecture 5 Parsing and Syntax III. Recap: Charniak s Model. Recap: Adding Head Words/Tags to Trees

Adding Some. Larry Moss. Nordic Logic School August 7-11, Indiana University 1/37

Philosophy 244: Modal Logic Preliminaries

HPSG II: the plot thickens

Syntax-Based Decoding

Sharpening the empirical claims of generative syntax through formalization

7.1 What is it and why should we care?

Two Reconstruction Puzzles Yael Sharvit University of Connecticut

Spring 2017 Ling 620 The Semantics of Control Infinitives: A First Introduction to De Se Attitudes

Explorers 5 Teacher s notes for the Comprehension Test: Aladdin

Stepanov 2007: The End of CED? Minimalism and Extraction Domains

1 Propositional Logic

Introduction to Proofs

When you are old: YEATS

Generalized Quantifiers Logical and Linguistic Aspects

Decoding and Inference with Syntactic Translation Models

NP-Completeness Part II

Essential facts about NP-completeness:

(Refer Slide Time: 0:21)

Semantics and Generative Grammar. An Introduction to Intensional Semantics 1

Machine Translation. CL1: Jordan Boyd-Graber. University of Maryland. November 11, 2013

Binding Theory Different types of NPs, constraints on their distribution

irst we need to know that there are many ways to indicate multiplication; for example the product of 5 and 7 can be written in a variety of ways:

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2010 Ling 720. Remko Scha (1981/1984): Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification

Models of Adjunction in Minimalist Grammars

Computationele grammatica

Dependency grammar. Recurrent neural networks. Transition-based neural parsing. Word representations. Informs Models

WORKSHEET. Área: ingles Periodo: 1 Fecha: 26 feb al 2 Mar. Competencia: writing and grammar comprehension. Uses of the past tenses Part I

The Semantics of Questions Introductory remarks

The Golden Windows - Unit 3 Worksheets: Reader 2

MITOCW 6. Standing Waves Part I

Parsing with Context-Free Grammars

Uniformity of Theta- Assignment Hypothesis. Transit i ve s. Unaccusatives. Unergatives. Double object constructions. Previously... Bill lied.

Lecture 7. Logic. Section1: Statement Logic.

Special Theory of Relativity Prof. Shiva Prasad Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 15 Momentum Energy Four Vector

Alex s Guide to Word Problems and Linear Equations Following Glencoe Algebra 1

Unifying Adjunct Islands and Freezing Effects in Minimalist Grammars

Transcription:

Other types of Movement So far we seen Wh-movement, which moves certain types of (XP) constituents to the specifier of a CP. Wh-movement is also called A-bar movement. We will look at two more types of movement. The first of these is a type of head-movement. That is, an X 0 moves, not an XP. Specifically a V 0. In effect, we have already seen this movement when we looked at matrix questions: 46a. What has he eaten? b. Why should she leave? c. Where can I go? d. Who must she interview? e. When is he leaving? 1

How do we get the word order in these sentences? In English (and other languages) matrix questions require a verb in C 0. Never mind why they do. Just take it as a given that they do. How does the verb get there? Certain verbs are already in I 0, among them auxiliaries be and have, the modals can, could, may, might, should, must. For those, it is very easy to satisfy the requirement to have a verb in C 0 : Head-movement! When the verb cannot appear in I 0, as with all the lexical verbs in English, we get do-insertion. Is do inserted straight into C 0 to satisfy its need for a verb? No! It carries tense and agreement. So it is first inserted in I 0 and then moves to C 0. 2

46d. Did you notice that again, movement is to a c-commanding position? CP NP k C who C 0 IP must NP I she I 0 VP V V 0 t k interview 3

I 0 -to-c 0 movement causes subject-verb inversion. Do you see why it would be called that? Here are some other environments with I 0 -to-c 0 movement in English (in addition to Wh-questions): Yes/no questions: 47. Must he leave? Negative-inversion : 48. [Never before in my life] have I seen such a mess 49. [Only if you give me $10K] will I give you my piano 48. *[Never before in my life] I have seen such a mess 49. *[Only if you give me $10K] I will give you my piano 50a. [If you give me $10K] I will give you my piano b. *If you give me $10K] will I give you my piano 4

I 0 -to-c 0 movement also causes a phenomenon called Verb Second. Can you see why it would be called that? 51. [Where] has she gone? 52. [Which of the books I gave her] has she read? 53. [Never before in my life] 54. [Only if you give me $10K] have I seen such a mess will I give you my piano V2: the verb comes directly after the first constituent and it doesn t matter how long the first constituent is: 55. [Which of the books that your uncle who studied at Stanford thinks were written by Tolstoy but were actually written by Dostoyevsky and were published by an obscure press] has she read? 5

English used to be what is called a generalized V2 language. That is, it had V2 everywhere. Now it is a residual V2 language. That is, it has V2 in certain restricted environments, as we saw, but not everywhere: 56. Yesterday, John left 57. If it rains, she stays inside However, there are plenty of languages that are generalized V2 today: -The Germanic languages German, Dutch, Swedish and others -The Kru language Vata (in Africa) -The Indo-Aryan language Kashmiri (Indian subcontinent) -The Arikem language Karitiana (Brazil) 6

Topicalization in a non-v2 L or Topicalization in a non-v2 L IP TopP XP IP XP Top Top 0 IP [Yesterday] she read a book [If you give me $10K] I will give you my piano [Susan] I really like 7

Topicalization in a V2 Language CP Exactly like wh-questions in English XP k C C 0 V 0 m IP 8

Here is some German. Notice how the verb comes immediately after the first constituent 58. [Gestern] ist der Hans weggefahren. yesterday is the Hans left Yesterday Hans left 59. [Weil er krank ist] ist er zuhause geblieben. [because he sick is] is he at-home stayed Because he is sick, he stayed home 60. [Wenn es regnet] bleibt Katharina zuhause if it rains stays Katharina at-home If it rains, Katharina stays home 61. [Den Hans] liebt die Maria the Hans loves the Maria Hans, Maria loves 9

Now look at these: 62. die Katharina liebt den Hans the Katharina loves the Hans S V O Katharina loves Hans 63. Ich glaube dass die Katharina den Hans liebt. I believe that the Katharina the Hans loves S O V I believe that Katharina loves Hans 64. * die Katharina den Hans liebt the Katharina the Hans loves S O V 65. * Ich glaube dass die Katharina liebt den Hans. I believe that the Katharina loves the Hans S V O German is SOV. SVO is the result of V2! V2 is I 0 -to-c 0 movement The presence of the complementizer blocks I 0 -to-c 0 movement 10

It s not a matter of matrix versus embedded clauses because matrix clauses with a complementizer can t have V2 and embedded clauses without a complementizer can: 66. Dass er mir so was antun kann! that he to-me such something on-do can "That he can do such a thing to me 67. Ich glaube die Katharina liebt den Hans. I believe the Katharina loves the Hans I believe that Katharina loves Hans 11

Imagine that you find SVO sentences in the language you are investigating. Can you conclude that the language is V2? No! It could be that this is a genuine SVO language. In order to conclude that it is V2, the verb would have to be in 2 nd place no matter what the first constituent is: Adv V SO O V S 12

Verb second is just a descriptive term for a phenomenon. The result is produced by I 0 -to-c 0 movement. V2 is an example of a parameter. UG makes head-movement available for all languages. Some employ it in I 0 -to-c 0 movement, which produces the strings that can receive the descriptive label verb second. 13

Alright. So this is I 0 -to-c 0 movement. But how does the verb get to I 0 to begin with? via head movement from within the VP: V 0 -to-i 0 movement IP NP I I 0 V 0 k VP V t k NP 14

V 0 to I 0 to C 0 CP C How do we know that it is the V 0 +I 0 complex that moves up to C 0 and not just I 0 or V o by itself? Because the verb appears in C 0 completely inflected. C 0 V 0 +I 0 IP NP I I 0 +V 0 VP V V 0 NP 15

To see V 0 -to- I 0 movement in simple action, one should really not look at English, because English has the added complication of do-insertion. So best to leave the question of English V 0 -to- I 0 for a more advanced class. A straightforward language to study V 0 -to- I 0 in is French. We saw that I 0 -to- C 0 movement was triggered by among others, the need to form questions in English. What might trigger V 0 -to- I 0? The need to get Tense and Agreement on the verb. This predicts that a verb with tense and agreement will be in a different position in the tree than an infinitival verb. So can how we tell whether V 0 -to- I 0 has taken place? Well, how could we tell if I 0 -to- C 0 movement took place? It affects the word order! The verb appears before the subject. 16

46d. Who must she interview? CP NP k C who C 0 IP must NP I she I 0 VP V V 0 t k interview 17

Maybe we should look for similar effects on word order with V 0 -to- I 0 movement: Let s assume that there is an element α, of which we are certain that it is generated under I 0 but above the VP. If, in a tensed sentence, the finite verb appears to the left of α, we can conclude that it has moved to I 0. If the finite verb appears to the right of α, we can conclude that it did not move to I 0. The infinitival verb would be predicted to appear after α. NP S I 0 α V 0 NP O NP S V α NP 0 V 0 -to- I 0 NP S α V NP 0 no V 0 -to- I 0 18

What are possible candidates for α? -Negation - (certain) adverbs Prediction, just looking at negation: verb+t+a: NP S V Neg NP 0 infinitival verb: NP S Neg V NP 0 (Emonds, Pollock) 19

The verb moving to pick up Tense and Agreement IP NP I I 0 NegP Neg Neg 0 VP V V 0 NP 20

The prediction is verified: 68a. Pierre (ne) voit pas Marie Peter sees not Marie Peter does not see Marie b. *Pierre (ne) pas voit Marie Peter not sees Marie 69a. Ne pas voir Marie est stupide neg see Marie is stupid To not see Marie is stupid b. *Ne voir pas Marie est stupide see neg Marie is stupid 21

References Huang, Cheng-Teh James Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar (PDF). 22

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 24.902 / 24.932 Language and its Structure II: Syntax Fall 2015 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.