This chapter illustrates the idea that all properties of the homogeneous electron gas (HEG) can be calculated from electron density.

Similar documents
PES 1120 Spring 2014, Spendier Lecture 6/Page 1

5.03, Inorganic Chemistry Prof. Daniel G. Nocera Lecture 2 May 11: Ligand Field Theory

Lecture 12: Discrete Laplacian

Prof. Dr. I. Nasser Phys 630, T Aug-15 One_dimensional_Ising_Model

Numerical Heat and Mass Transfer

Introduction to Density Functional Theory. Jeremie Zaffran 2 nd year-msc. (Nanochemistry)

Robert Eisberg Second edition CH 09 Multielectron atoms ground states and x-ray excitations

Multi-electron atoms (11) 2010 update Extend the H-atom picture to more than 1 electron: H-atom sol'n use for N-elect., assume product wavefct.

This model contains two bonds per unit cell (one along the x-direction and the other along y). So we can rewrite the Hamiltonian as:

Composite Hypotheses testing

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 3 Solutions Out: Oct 1, 2008., where ( 00. ), so the overall state of the system is ) ( ( ( ( 00 ± 11 ), Φ ± = 1

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 27 Jan 2003

Physics 181. Particle Systems

Frequency dependence of the permittivity

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

1 (1 + ( )) = 1 8 ( ) = (c) Carrying out the Taylor expansion, in this case, the series truncates at second order:

Inductance Calculation for Conductors of Arbitrary Shape

Workshop: Approximating energies and wave functions Quantum aspects of physical chemistry

Implicit Integration Henyey Method

Probabilistic method to determine electron correlation energy

1. Mean-Field Theory. 2. Bjerrum length

where the sums are over the partcle labels. In general H = p2 2m + V s(r ) V j = V nt (jr, r j j) (5) where V s s the sngle-partcle potental and V nt

Lecture Notes on Linear Regression

12. The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Michael Fowler

Complex Variables. Chapter 18 Integration in the Complex Plane. March 12, 2013 Lecturer: Shih-Yuan Chen

π e ax2 dx = x 2 e ax2 dx or x 3 e ax2 dx = 1 x 4 e ax2 dx = 3 π 8a 5/2 (a) We are considering the Maxwell velocity distribution function: 2πτ/m

Note on the Electron EDM

ECEN 5005 Crystals, Nanocrystals and Device Applications Class 19 Group Theory For Crystals

Fermi-Dirac statistics

Lecture Note 3. Eshelby s Inclusion II

THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

j) = 1 (note sigma notation) ii. Continuous random variable (e.g. Normal distribution) 1. density function: f ( x) 0 and f ( x) dx = 1

ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

Lossy Compression. Compromise accuracy of reconstruction for increased compression.

8. Superfluid to Mott-insulator transition

A how to guide to second quantization method.

GW Approximation in ωk space

DETAILED DERIVATION OF THE GENERAL MASTER EQUATION IN QUANTUM OPTICS

Rate of Absorption and Stimulated Emission

A particle in a state of uniform motion remain in that state of motion unless acted upon by external force.

Linear Approximation with Regularization and Moving Least Squares

Probability Theory. The nth coefficient of the Taylor series of f(k), expanded around k = 0, gives the nth moment of x as ( ik) n n!

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2004) Lecture 23 (12/3/04) Nuclear Reactions: Energetics and Compound Nucleus

The Feynman path integral

NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION

V.C The Niemeijer van Leeuwen Cumulant Approximation

TP A SOLUTION. For an ideal monatomic gas U=3/2nRT, Since the process is at constant pressure Q = C. giving ) =1000/(5/2*8.31*10)

Georgia Tech PHYS 6124 Mathematical Methods of Physics I

8.1 Arc Length. What is the length of a curve? How can we approximate it? We could do it following the pattern we ve used before

CME 302: NUMERICAL LINEAR ALGEBRA FALL 2005/06 LECTURE 13

PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL EXCLUSION STATISTICS IN INTERACTING PARTICLE SYSTEMS

The equation of motion of a dynamical system is given by a set of differential equations. That is (1)

Modeling and Simulation NETW 707

Solution Thermodynamics

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Principle of Virtual Work-1

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

ˆ (0.10 m) E ( N m /C ) 36 ˆj ( j C m)

Richard Socher, Henning Peters Elements of Statistical Learning I E[X] = arg min. E[(X b) 2 ]

MAGNETISM MAGNETIC DIPOLES

Homework & Solution. Contributors. Prof. Lee, Hyun Min. Particle Physics Winter School. Park, Ye

Lecture 10. Reading: Notes and Brennan Chapter 5

U-Pb Geochronology Practical: Background

Lecture 5.8 Flux Vector Splitting

An introduction to continuum electrostatics

Global Sensitivity. Tuesday 20 th February, 2018

1 Matrix representations of canonical matrices

Strong Markov property: Same assertion holds for stopping times τ.

Title: Radiative transitions and spectral broadening

Spring 2002 Lecture #13

Electrical double layer: revisit based on boundary conditions

Some Comments on Accelerating Convergence of Iterative Sequences Using Direct Inversion of the Iterative Subspace (DIIS)

DECOUPLING THEORY HW2

9 Derivation of Rate Equations from Single-Cell Conductance (Hodgkin-Huxley-like) Equations

Gouy-Chapman model (1910) The double layer is not as compact as in Helmholtz rigid layer.

4.2 Chemical Driving Force

Quantum Field Theory III

ψ ij has the eigenvalue

r i r j 3. (2) Gm j m i r i (r i r j ) r i r j 3. (3)

MAE140 - Linear Circuits - Winter 16 Midterm, February 5

Chapter 5. Solution of System of Linear Equations. Module No. 6. Solution of Inconsistent and Ill Conditioned Systems

) is the unite step-function, which signifies that the second term of the right-hand side of the

1 Generating functions, continued

Problem Set 9 Solutions

Solutions to Problem Set 6

Im(z) RARA ARRA ARAR

MAE140 - Linear Circuits - Fall 13 Midterm, October 31

Lecture 3: Probability Distributions

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Newtonian Mechanics

Feynman parameter integrals

Fermi Statistics and Fermi Surface. Sommerfeld Theory. 2.1 Fermi Statistics and Fermi Surface

ESI-3D: Electron Sharing Indexes Program for 3D Molecular Space Partition

Complex Atoms; The Exclusion Principle and the Periodic System

One Dimension Again. Chapter Fourteen

Uncertainty as the Overlap of Alternate Conditional Distributions

STATISTICAL MECHANICS

Curve Fitting with the Least Square Method

Econ107 Applied Econometrics Topic 3: Classical Model (Studenmund, Chapter 4)

Lecture 14: Forces and Stresses

Supporting Information

U.C. Berkeley CS294: Beyond Worst-Case Analysis Luca Trevisan September 5, 2017

Transcription:

1 Unform Electron Gas Ths chapter llustrates the dea that all propertes of the homogeneous electron gas (HEG) can be calculated from electron densty. Intutve Representaton of Densty Electron densty n s a very physcally meanngful quantty, but just to make t more ntutve (and even measurable!), let s defne such that r s ( 3 4πn )3 (1) 4 3 πr3 s = 1 n = Ω N e (2) Snce n s unform n HEG, r s s a vald alternatve representaton of densty. Electron Hamltonan Recall the electron Hamltonan (frst lne of (3.1) on p52) H e = 2 2 + 1 k e2 2m e 2 r j,i j k Z Ie 2 r I (3) n atomc unts H e = 1 2 + 1 1 2 2 r j,i j Z I r I (4) when both the electrons and the background ons are unformly dstrbuted, the last term (electron-on nteracton) can be approxmated by densty nteracton H e = 1 2 + 1 1 1 2 2 r j 2 j d rd r n 2 r r (5) ne ne Fgure 1: Unform electrons and ons

2 now, f we use r s as the length unt nstead of Bohr a o H e = 1 ( a o ) 2 2 2 r + 1 ( a o ) 1 1 s 2 r s r j 2 (a o ) d rd r n 2 r s r r j =( a o ) 2 1 2 + 1 r s 1 1 d rd r n 2 r s 2 2 a o r j 2 r r j =( a o ) 2 1 r s 2 2 + 1 r s 1 1 3 d r n2 (6) 2 a o r j 2 2π r j We see that as we ncrease densty (decrease r s ), the total energy of HEG goes up (duh), but ts behavor also changes due to a rescalng of the relatve strengths of the knetc and nteracton terms. Non-nteractng Lmt Wthout nteracton, snce the system s homogeneous each electron feels a background potental V o and the Hamltonan s smple H NI e = ˆT = 1 2 the egenfunctons are plane waves and the egenvalues are ψ k ( r) = 1 Ω e k r 2 + V o (7) (8) ɛ k = 1 2 k2 (9) For all Ne σ electrons wth the same spn σ, we can calculate the Ferm vector due to Paul excluson as 4π 3 kσ 3 F = (2π)3 Ω N e σ = (2π) 3 n σ kf σ = (6π 2 ) 1/3 n σ1/3 (10) snce each k state has sze (2π)3 Ω n recprocal space. The Ferm energy per electron EF σ o = Eσ F /N e σ s gven by EF σ o = 1 2 kσ 2 F (11) and knetc energy per electron T σ o = 1 N σ e ɛ k ( k k σ F 0 d k (2π) 3 /Ω ) 1 k σ F 0 d k 1 (2π) 3 /Ω 2 k2 =( 4π 3 k3 F ) 1 4π 5 (1 2 k5 F ) = 3 5 Eσ F o (12)

3 Hartree-Fock Approxmaton Wth the ncluson of coulomb and exchange nteractons, the Hamltonan H HF e = ˆT + ˆV ext + ˆV x (13) the egenfunctons are stll plane waves ψ k ( r) = 1 Ω e k r (14) but the egenvalues are modfed by matrx elements of the exchange operator ɛ k = 1 2 k2 + k F f(x) (15) π where x = k/k F and Luttnger guarantees that k F s stll (10), further f(x) = (1 + 1 x2 2x + x ln 1 ) (16) 1 x Notce lm f(x) = 2 and lm f(x) = 1, thus as k s vared from 0 to k F, x 0 x 1 ɛ k s lowest reach s extended by 2k F /π, whereas ts hghest reach s reduced by k F /π, resultng n a net broadenng of allowed energy band wdth W = k F /π. If we normalze (15) wth the Ferm energy ɛ F = 1 2 k2 F, we get η(x) = ɛ k /ɛ F = x 2 + 2 πk F f(x) (17) If we further measure energy from the Ferm surface ( η(1) = 0), we need η(x) = (x 2 1) + 2 πk F (f(x) + 1) (18) Ths Normalzed energy s plotted n the book (Fgure 5.2 Rght). Exchange Energy Recall the k F π f(x) contrbuton to energy comes from the exchange operator, therefore the exchange energy per electron ɛ σ x = 1 2 kσ F π f(x) = 3 4π kσ F = 3 4 ( 6 π nσ ) 1/3 (19) notce the factor 1/2 s to elmnate over-count and the average value of f(x) throughout the Ferm sphere f(x) = ( 4 kf 3 πk3 F ) 1 d kf(k) = 3 2 The average exchange energy per electron for both and electrons s ɛ x =E x /N = N ɛ x + N ɛ x N = 3 4 ( 6 π )1/3 n 4/3 + n 4/3 0 n = n ɛ x + n ɛ x n (20) (21)

4 If we defne the degree of polarzaton to be ζ = n n n, we can rewrte (21) as ɛ x = 3 4 ( 6 π )1/3 1 2 4/3 [(1 + ζ)4/3 + (1 ζ) 4/3 ]n 1/3 =An 1/3 1 2 [(1 + ζ)4/3 + (1 ζ) 4/3 ] (22) at the un-polarzed and fully-polarzed extremes { ɛx (n, 0) = An 1/3 ɛ x (n, 1) = An 1/3 2 1/3 (23) for some nexplcable reason, we want to rewrte (22) as an nterpolaton ɛ x (n, ζ) = ɛ x (n, 0) + [ɛ x (n, 1) ɛ x (n, 0)] { 1 2 (1 + ζ) 4/3 + (1 ζ) 4/3 } 2 2 1/3 1 (24) Exchange Hole The Ferm exchange hole can be calculated as (see (3.56) on p66) g( x; x ) = 1 ρ σ( x, x ) 2 n( x)n( x ) gx σ,σ (y) = 1 ( ρ(y) n )2 (25) where y = k σ F r wth r = r r beng the separaton between electrons and ρ(y) s the frst order reduced densty matrx for ndependent Fermons gven by ρ(r = r r ) = d k r = 1 (2π) 3 k = β 1 d 1 d (2π) 2 r dr r dr f(ɛ(k)) k r d kf(ɛ(k))e k ( r r ) dk cos(kr)f (β( 1 2 k2 µ)) (26) 1 where f(ɛ) = r e β(ɛ µ) +1 s the Ferm-Drac dstrbuton and 1 k = e k r (2π) 3 are just plane waves. The last lne was obtaned usng partal ntegraton and ths fnal form s REALLY revealng! ρ(y) = k F 3π y 3 2 [3sn(y) y cos(y) Fnally, pluggng (27) nto (25) we have ] = n 2 sn(y) y cos(y) [3 y 3 ] (27) g σ,σ x (y) = 1 [3 sn(y) y cos(y) y 3 ] 2 (28)

5 Correlaton Energy In general, t s mpossble to determne the correlaton energy analytcally. Exact solutons are only avalable n certan lmts. For un-polarzed gas ζ = 0, results are avalable for the hgh densty (r s 0) and low densty case (r s 1) { 0.311 ln(rs ) 0.048 + r s (A ln(r s ) + C) + r s 0 ɛ c (r s, 0) a 1 r s + a2 + a3 rs 3/2 r + r s 2 s 1 (29) Some data are also avalable for fully polarzed gas ɛ c (n, 1). Thus Perdew- Zunger(PZ) boldly (and qute correctly) guessed that ɛ c nterpolates n the same way that ɛ x does. They proposed ɛ c (n, ζ) = ɛ c (n, 0) + [ɛ c (n, 1) ɛ c (n, 0)]f x (ζ) (30) where f x (ζ) s the same nterpolaton functon at the end of (24). Correlaton Hole The total contrbuton from exchange and correlaton can be expressed as an ntegral of exchange-correlaton hole ɛ xc (r s ) = 1 2n e2 d r nav xc(r) (31) r where n av xc(r) s the couplng-constant-averaged hole Bondng n Metals n av xc(r) = 1 0 dλn λ xc(r) (32) The alkal metals are remarkably well represented by energy of HEG plus attractve nteracton wth the postve cores. Wth ths model, the total energy per electron ɛ tot = E total N = 1.105 rs 2 0.458 + ɛ c 1 r s 2 α + ɛ R (33) r s where ɛ c s the correlaton energy per electron, α s the Madelung constant for pont charges and ɛ R s due to core repulson owng to the fnte szes of ons, whch amounts to removng attracton n regons wth core radus R C around the ons Rc ɛ R = n2π drr 2 e2 0 r = 3 Rc 2 2 rs 3 (34) We can now predct the densty of these metals by fndng the mnmum of (33), takng α = 1.80 and R c = 2, we get r s = 4 whch s not bad. Further, the predcted bulk modulus B = Ω d2 E dω 2 = 51.7 Mbar (35) s often qute good for sp-bonded metals to strongly bonded covalent solds. r 5 s

6 Exctaton Here we re manly nterested n collectve exctatons that don t change the number of electrons. Examples are charge densty fluctuatons (plasma oscllaton) descrbed by delectrc functon and spn fluctuatons descrbed by spn response functons. In a homogeneous system, the delectrc functon s smply a response to an nternal feld. In Fourer space In terms of potentals D(q, ω) = E(q, ω) + 4π P (q, ω) = ɛ(q, ω) E(q, ω) (36) ɛ(q, ω) = δv ext( q, ω) δv test ( q, ω) = 1 4πe2 q 2 χ n( q, ω) (37)