ATLAS EXPERIMENT : HOW THE DATA FLOWS. (Trigger, Computing, and Data Analysis)

Similar documents
Particle detection 1

The ATLAS trigger - commissioning with cosmic rays

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

LHCb: From the detector to the first physics results

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS MUON TRIGGER IN RUN 2

Non-collision Background Monitoring Using the Semi-Conductor Tracker of ATLAS at LHC

Status and Performance of the ATLAS Experiment

2 ATLAS operations and data taking

2008 JINST 3 S Outlook. Chapter 11

Dr. Andrea Bocci. Using GPUs to Accelerate Online Event Reconstruction. at the Large Hadron Collider. Applied Physicist

4. LHC experiments Marcello Barisonzi LHC experiments August

Z-Path 2014 Event Displays Examples of l + l -, and 4-lepton events

Risultati dell esperimento ATLAS dopo il run 1 di LHC. C. Gemme (INFN Genova), F. Parodi (INFN/University Genova) Genova, 28 Maggio 2013

THE ATLAS TRIGGER SYSTEM UPGRADE AND PERFORMANCE IN RUN 2

PoS(EPS-HEP 2013)508. CMS Detector: Performance Results. Speaker. I. Redondo * CIEMAT

PoS(HCP2009)042. Status of the ALICE Experiment. Werner Riegler. For the ALICE Collaboration. CERN

READINESS OF THE CMS DETECTOR FOR FIRST DATA

The ATLAS Detector - Inside Out Julia I. Hofmann

Alexei Safonov Lecture #18

Future prospects for the measurement of direct photons at the LHC

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Introduction of CMS Detector. Ijaz Ahmed National Centre for Physics, Islamabad

Design of the new ATLAS Inner Tracker for the High Luminosity LHC era

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. Commissioning of the CMS Detector

Performance of muon and tau identification at ATLAS

Reconstruction and identification of hadronic τ decays with ATLAS

Application of the Tau Identification Capability of CMS in the Detection of Associated Production of MSSM Heavy Neutral Higgs Bosons Souvik Das

Upgrade of ATLAS and CMS for High Luminosity LHC: Detector performance and Physics potential

Searches at the LHC and the discovery of the Higgs Boson

Identifying Particle Trajectories in CMS using the Long Barrel Geometry

Physics potential of ATLAS upgrades at HL-LHC

ATLAS-CONF October 15, 2010

Status of ATLAS and Preparation for the Pb-Pb Run

The ATLAS muon and tau triggers

The ATLAS C. Gemme, F.Parodi

Discovery of the W and Z 0 Bosons

The ATLAS Run 2 Trigger: Design, Menu, Performance and Operational Aspects

b Physics Prospects For The LHCb Experiment Thomas Ruf for the LHCb Collaboration Introduction Detector Status Physics Program

Search for a Z at an e + e - Collider Thomas Walker

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

The Alice Experiment Felix Freiherr von Lüdinghausen

Analysis of W µν+jets

Atlas Status and Perspectives

LHC & ATLAS. The largest particle physics experiment in the world. Vincent Hedberg - Lund University 1

Dario Barberis Evaluation of GEANT4 Electromagnetic and Hadronic Physics in ATLAS

Reconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part IX)

(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

Introduction. The LHC environment. What do we expect to do first? W/Z production (L 1-10 pb -1 ). W/Z + jets, multi-boson production. Top production.

LHC State of the Art and News

Last Friday: pp(bar) Physics Intro, the TeVatron

Dissecting the Higgs Discovery: The Anatomy of a 21st Century Scientific Achievement

Early physics with the LHCb detector

The LHCb Experiment II Detector XXXIV SLAC Summer Institute, July, 2006

The Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment. at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

The ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter: Construction, Integration, Commissioning Ph. Schwemling on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group

The ATLAS Detector at the LHC

Calibration and Performance of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter During the LHC Run 2

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

Performance of the ALICE Muon Trigger system in Pb Pb collisions

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Detecting. Particles

Digital Calorimetry for Future Linear Colliders. Tony Price University of Birmingham University of Birmingham PPE Seminar 13 th November 2013

ATLAS NOTE. August 25, Electron Identification Studies for the Level 1 Trigger Upgrade. Abstract

PoS(EPS-HEP2011)250. Search for Higgs to WW (lνlν, lνqq) with the ATLAS Detector. Jonas Strandberg

Efficiency of the CMS Level-1 Trigger to. Selected Physics Channels

Examples for experiments that can be done at the T9 beam line

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Calibration and Monitoring Systems

ATLAS HLT Steering. Andrey Belkin Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz

The ALICE Experiment Introduction to relativistic heavy ion collisions

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS LIQUID ARGON FORWARD CALORIMETER IN BEAM TESTS

Jet Reconstruction and Energy Scale Determination in ATLAS

Simulation and validation of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter response

ATLAS Z-Path Masterclass 2013

Overview of the ATLAS detector. 1.1 Physics requirements and detector overview

Triggering on Long-lived neutral particles in ATLAS

etectors for High Energy Physics

Expected Performance of the ATLAS Inner Tracker at the High-Luminosity LHC

Studies of the performance of the ATLAS detector using cosmic-ray muons

A glance at LHC Detector Systems. Burkhard Schmidt, CERN PH-DT

CMS Status and the US-CMS DAQ projects

ALICE Detector Status and Commissioning

Highlights from the LHC Run1

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 6 Jul 2007

Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the Linear Collider using GEM Technology

V0 cross-section measurement at LHCb. RIVET analysis module for Z boson decay to di-electron

Studies on the e + e - spectrum with the first data of the CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider

Physics object reconstruction in the ATLAS experiment

The CMS Particle Flow Algorithm

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector tracking system

Chapter 2 Experimental Apparatus

The Discovery of the Higgs Boson: one step closer to understanding the beginning of the Universe

Commissioning of the ATLAS LAr Calorimeter

QCD cross section measurements with the OPAL and ATLAS detectors

Central Meson Production in ALICE

The LHC The Large Hadron Collider and ATLAS

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 2 Nov 2010

Walter Hopkins. February

LHC Detectors and their Physics Potential. Nick Ellis PH Department, CERN, Geneva

Transcription:

ATLAS EXPERIMENT : HOW THE DATA FLOWS (Trigger, Computing, and Data Analysis) In order to process large volumes of data within nanosecond timescales, the trigger system is designed to select interesting events quickly and efficiently. At the LHC design intensities, one billion events per second occur within the ATLAS detector but only one Higgs boson is produced in 10 seconds. It is not technically possible to store the data for all events, nor is it wanted; therefore the trigger is used to reject large numbers of events and retain only the interesting events. This is done in three successive stages by the trigger system, called the Level-1, Level-2 and the Event Filter triggers. Figure 6 shows a simplified drawing of the data flow, which is discussed in more detail below. Figure 6: An illustration of the data flow path from the ATLAS detector to permanent storage on disk and tapes as described in the text.

The goal of the Level-1 trigger is to reduce the event rate from 40 MHz to 75 khz, within a time frame of 2.5 microseconds. Some of the most interesting events, such as Higgs decays, contain energetic leptons, photons and jets and the Level-1 trigger uses specialized hardware to find these objects. This is done with two dedicated systems: the Level-1 calorimeter trigger and the Level-1 muon trigger. The Level-1 calorimeter trigger receives 7,200 analog signals from the electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters, which are a sum of several calorimeter cells and therefore have a reduced granularity, with respect to that shown in Table 1. Using these signals, specialized hardware is used to search for patterns as expected for electrons, photons, τ-leptons and jets. The Level-1 calorimeter system can also calculate the amount of missing transverse energy in an event. Muon tracks are found by measuring hits in one plane and then searching for additional hits in nearby planes along pre-determined patterns. In parallel during this time, the analog signals from the interacting particles have been processed by the front-end electronics for all the sub-detectors. These signals are digitized and stored (either as analog or digital signals) in the so-called Level-1 buffer. The data waits in these buffers until the decision from the Level-1 trigger system is made. For each object found by the Level-1 systems, a region-of-interest is identified. The number of identified objects passing different energy thresholds is then sent to the central trigger processor, which determines, for example, if a sufficient number of energetic objects has been found in this event. The central trigger has up to 128 different criteria to which to compare the event. If the event passes one of these criteria, a so-called Level-1 accept is sent to the detector, which signals to the front-end hardware to send the data to the Readout Drivers (RODs) for further processing. Otherwise, the data is removed from the Level-1 buffer. Unlike the front-end hardware, the RODs are not located in the detector hall but in a room several dozen meters away, which is shielded from radiation. Here the data is stored and can be requested by the Level-2 and event filter trigger systems. To minimize the data transfer volume, the Level-2 system only requests detector information within the region-of-interests as specified by the Level-1 systems. Using commercial computers, the Level-2 systems runs more complex lepton, photon and jet identification algorithms using information from the tracking detectors, the muon spectrometer and in addition the full granularity information from the calorimeters. This system reduces the event rate to 3.5 khz within 10 milliseconds. If the event passes one of 256 different Level-2 event criteria, the full detector information is transferred to the event filter system, where a final selection is run using commercial computers. The event rate is reduced at this stage to a few hundreds of Hz within one second. Over 17,000 computing cores are used in the Level-2 and event filter systems. If the event is selected, the data is transferred to permanent storage at the CERN computing centre. If it is not, the event is deleted from the RODs. Once the event is saved, it still needs to be processed so that it can be analysed by ATLAS members. Here the computing system faces many challenges; it must process high volumes of data quickly and distribute that data

to ATLAS collaborators around the world. For this a pyramid-structured computing model is used, called the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG). The CERN computing centre, called the Tier-0, processes all the data for the first time. This first processing plays an important role in understanding the detector. The conditions of the detector components and therefore the response can change over time or even malfunction. Some detector changes, such as the failure of a single channel can be corrected for but other problems, such as a malfunctioning power supply affecting many channels must be addressed immediately. An ATLAS member therefore monitors the data from each stage of the trigger live in the control room. At the Tier-0 a small set of data is processed within one hour, so that analysers can study the data in more detail within the next 24 hours. Data, which are unusable, are flagged so that analysers can reject these events. But a large fraction, approximately 95% of the data, is usable for analysis. After processing at the Tier-0, the data is then copied to one or more of the Tier-1s, which are approximately a dozen large computing centres located worldwide. The Tier-1s re-process the data when needed. Small subsets of the data are copied to one or more of the roughly 150 Tier-2s, which are located mainly at universities and are the most convenient sites for ATLAS members to access the data. The Tier-2s are also the main production sites for generating the large samples of simulated events. For analysis, the data is stored in userfriendly formats, which contain information about the reconstructed objects for each event. Analysers then process this information on local computers and produce histograms of the data. This model enables researchers including students to analyse the data from their home institute. Commissioning and Performance The calibration of the ATLAS detector is a complex task and has involved the work of thousands of physicists. Two examples of the calibration are highlighted here: the determination of the detector s response to electrons, photons, muons and jets and the alignment of the tracking and muon systems. The detector response refers to the determination of both the energy or momentum scale, which is an estimate of the amount of energy/momentum a particle had and the resolution, which is an estimate of how precisely that energy/momentum is measured. Before the detector was fully installed in the cavern, one important first study of the response was to place a small but complete slice of the ATLAS detector in a particle beam test at CERN. In this test in 2004, the beams of electrons, photons, pions and muon with energies between 1 and 350 GeV, were targeted on the detector components. The response of the detector is measured and then using the known energy of the beam, this response is calibrated into an amount of deposited energy.

Figure 7: Invariant mass in GeV of events with two muons. The resonance peaks for the various mesons and the Z boson are labelled. EF_mu15 refers to the name of the trigger used to select the events. To verify the detector response using particle beam test data as well as to monitor that response over time, well-known Standard Model particles are used. The Z boson, whose mass is well measured from the LEP collider experiments, can decay to two electrons or two muons with opposite charge. The invariant mass distribution, which is a reconstruction of the Z mass using its decay products, is then used to determine the energy scale and resolution of electrons and muons. Figure 7 shows the invariant mass distribution for muon pairs. The Z boson mass peak, as well as the mass peaks from the decays of mesons such as the J/ψ, are clearly visible. Studies of the decay products of the Z boson are also used to estimate the efficiency with which the detector finds electrons and muons. Another important calibration for the tracking and muon systems is their alignment, which refers to the determination of the exact location of each tracking module or muon chamber. In order to precisely measure the bending of tracks from charged particles in the magnetic field, the location of each pixel or silicon module, for example, must be known to better than 15 microns. To test the alignment before the start of the LHC, the only available source of energetic particles were muons from cosmic rays. Between 2008 and 2009, the ATLAS detector collected signals from over 300 million cosmic ray muons. These events were used to establish a first, rough alignment and they were also a critical test of the full ATLAS readout system from the Level-1 trigger to the processing of the data on the Grid. To determine the final alignment, charged particles from the beam interactions are used. To achieve this, the trajectory of single, isolated tracks (i.e. a track which has no other tracks nearby) is measured and any misalignment of the components can be determined. Several million tracks are needed in order to determine the alignment of the pixel and silicon detectors.

The detector performance has immediate impact on physics measurements; a worsening of the photon energy resolution, for example would lead to a worsening of the two photon invariant mass distribution used for the Higgs discovery. Overall the performance of the ATLAS detector has been spectacular. Within only three years of LHC running, the calibration and performance of the detector has reached its design goals. The relative resolution for electrons, photons and muons is at the percent level over large momentum and energy ranges. These resolutions are summarised in Table 2. Detector component Tracking EM calorimetry Resolution σpt/pt=0.05%pt 1% σe/e=10%/e 0.7% Hadronic calorimetry (jets) barrel and end-caps forward Muon spectrometer σe/e=50%/e 3% σe/e=100%/e 10% σpt/pt=10% at pt=1tev Indicative resolutions of the ATLAS detector components. The units for energy E and transverse momentum pt are in GeV. The symbol means adding both parts in quadrature. Source : http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/the_atlas_experiment