arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.other] 27 Mar 2007

Similar documents
Fermi-Bose and Bose-Bose K-Rb Quantum Degenerate Mixtures

Evolution of a collapsing and exploding Bose-Einstein condensate in different trap symmetries

Lecture 3. Bose-Einstein condensation Ultracold molecules

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 17 Apr 2000

BEC of 6 Li 2 molecules: Exploring the BEC-BCS crossover

A study of the BEC-BCS crossover region with Lithium 6

Ultracold chromium atoms: From Feshbach resonances to a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 28 Jan 2003

Confining ultracold atoms on a ring in reduced dimensions

Cold fermions, Feshbach resonance, and molecular condensates (II)

Introduction to Cold Atoms and Bose-Einstein Condensation. Randy Hulet

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.other] 7 Dec 2004

Bose-Einstein condensation of lithium molecules and studies of a strongly interacting Fermi gas

Vector solitons in two-component Bose-Einstein condensates with tunable interactions and harmonic potential

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 19 Jul 2012

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 1 Sep 2010

Lecture 4. Feshbach resonances Ultracold molecules

Evidence for Efimov Quantum states

From laser cooling to BEC First experiments of superfluid hydrodynamics

Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose-Einstein condensate

Bose-Bose mixtures in confined dimensions

Fluids with dipolar coupling

Search. Search and Discovery Ultracold Fermionic Atoms Team up as Molecules: Can They Form Cooper Pairs as Well? 1 of 10 11/12/2003 4:57 PM

A Mixture of Bose and Fermi Superfluids. C. Salomon

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 17 Feb 2003

6P 3/2 6S 1/2. optical pumping. degenerate Raman transition. ıν=2> ıν=1> ıν=0> ıν=2> ıν=1> ıν=0> Zeeman energy. F=3, m F =3

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS

Few-Body physics with ultracold K and Rb: Efimov physics and the Bose polaron

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 24 Jul 2001

Photoassociation spectroscopy of a spin-1 Bose-Einstein condensate

Informal Workshop on Cold atoms and Quantum Simulations. Monday 3 and Tuesday 4 December Program. Monday, December 3

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 5 Feb 2001

Nature of spinor Bose-Einstein condensates in rubidium

Ultracold Fermi Gases with unbalanced spin populations

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 25 Mar 2010

Dipolar Interactions and Rotons in Atomic Quantum Gases. Falk Wächtler. Workshop of the RTG March 13., 2014

Fermi Condensates ULTRACOLD QUANTUM GASES

Monte Carlo Simulation of Bose Einstein Condensation in Traps

arxiv: v1 [physics.atom-ph] 1 Jul 2011

Studies of Ultracold. Ytterbium and Lithium. Anders H. Hansen University of Washington Dept of Physics

Reference for most of this talk:

A Mixture of Bose and Fermi Superfluids. C. Salomon

Revolution in Physics. What is the second quantum revolution? Think different from Particle-Wave Duality

Experiments with an Ultracold Three-Component Fermi Gas

sun surface water boiling water freezing liquid nitrogen cosmic background radiation superfluidity, superconductivity laser cooling

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 13 Mar 1998

Atomic Fermi Gases in an Optical Lattice

Experimental Studies of Bose-Einstein Condensates in Disorder

INTERACTING BOSE GAS AND QUANTUM DEPLETION

Harvard University Physics 284 Spring 2018 Strongly correlated systems in atomic and condensed matter physics

R 85 b tunable-interaction Bose Einstein condensate machine

Quantum Quantum Optics Optics VII, VII, Zakopane Zakopane, 11 June 09, 11

Dynamics of Bosons in Two Wells of an External Trap

Superfluidity in interacting Fermi gases

ICAP Summer School, Paris, Three lectures on quantum gases. Wolfgang Ketterle, MIT

Path-integrals and the BEC/BCS crossover in dilute atomic gases

Fermi-Bose mixtures of 40 K and 87 Rb atoms: Does a Bose Einstein condensate float in a Fermi sea?"

Ultracold atoms and molecules

Ytterbium quantum gases in Florence

Non-equilibrium Dynamics in Ultracold Fermionic and Bosonic Gases

From BEC to BCS. Molecular BECs and Fermionic Condensates of Cooper Pairs. Preseminar Extreme Matter Institute EMMI. and

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 30 Oct 2017

Condensation of pairs of fermionic lithium atoms

Ultracold scattering properties of the short-lived Rb isotopes

Frequency-dependent polarizabilities of alkali-metal atoms from ultraviolet through infrared spectral regions

1. Cold Collision Basics

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.other] 19 Dec 2005

arxiv:physics/ v2 27 Mar 2006

Quantum Gases. Subhadeep Gupta. UW REU Seminar, 11 July 2011

LASER COOLING AND TRAPPING OF ATOMIC STRONTIUM FOR ULTRACOLD ATOMS PHYSICS, HIGH-PRECISION SPECTROSCOPY AND QUANTUM SENSORS

BCS Pairing Dynamics. ShengQuan Zhou. Dec.10, 2006, Physics Department, University of Illinois

1. SYSTEM GEOMETRY AND PREPARATION FIG. S1.

Structure and stability of trapped atomic boson-fermion mixtures

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 23 Jul 2009

Many-Body Physics with Quantum Gases

Mean-field model for Josephson oscillation in a Bose-Einstein condensate on an one-dimensional optical trap

Phase coherence and superfluid-insulator transition in a disordered Bose-Einstein condensate

BEC and superfluidity in ultracold Fermi gases

Degenerate atom-molecule mixture in a cold Fermi gas

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.other] 15 Sep 2008

Bose-Einstein condensates in optical lattices

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 25 Nov 1997

hal , version 1-9 Jan 2007

arxiv:cond-mat/ v2 [cond-mat.other] 2 Feb 2006

Universal van der Waals Physics for Three Ultracold Atoms

Physica D. Experimental studies of Bose Einstein condensates in disorder

The amazing story of Laser Cooling and Trapping

Introduction to Bose-Einstein condensation 4. STRONGLY INTERACTING ATOMIC FERMI GASES

PROGRESS TOWARDS CONSTRUCTION OF A FERMIONIC ATOMIC CLOCK FOR NASA S DEEP SPACE NETWORK

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 26 Nov 2002

Thermalization in mixtures of ultracold gases

Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Vapor

Strongly paired fermions

Philipp T. Ernst, Sören Götze, Jannes Heinze, Jasper Krauser, Christoph Becker & Klaus Sengstock. Project within FerMix collaboration

Condensation of Excitons in a Trap

Magnetism and Hund s Rule in an Optical Lattice with Cold Fermions

Bose-Einstein condensation; Quantum weirdness at the lowest temperature in the universe

Quantum Properties of Two-dimensional Helium Systems

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.other] 21 Jul 2009

C. A. Sackett, J. M. Gerton, M. Welling, and R. G. Hulet 1. Physics Department, MS 61. Rice University. Houston, TX 77251

Transcription:

39 K Bose-Einstein condensate with tunable interactions arxiv:cond-mat/0703714v1 [cond-mat.other] 27 Mar 2007 G. Roati, 1 M. Zaccanti, 1 C. D Errico, 1 J. Catani, 1 M. Modugno, 2 A. Simoni, 3 M. Inguscio, 1 and G. Modugno 1 1 LENS and Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Firenze, INFN and INFM-CNR Via Nello Carrara 1, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy 2 LENS and Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata, Università di Firenze, INFN, and BEC-INFM Center, Università di Trento, I-38050 Povo, Italy 3 Laboratoire de Physique des Atomes, Lasers, Molécules et Surfaces UMR 6627 du CNRS and Université de Rennes, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France (Dated: February 3, 2008) We produce a Bose-Einstein condensate of 39 K atoms. Condensation of this species with naturally small and negative scattering length is achieved by a combination of sympathetic cooling with 87 Rb and direct evaporation, exploiting the magnetic tuning of both inter- and intra-species interactions at Feshbach resonances. We explore tunability of the self-interactions by studying the expansion and the stability of the condensate. We find that a 39 K condensate is interesting for future experiments requiring a weakly interacting Bose gas. PACS numbers: 03.75.-b; 34.50.-s; 32.80.Pj Two-body interactions play a major role in the production and in the properties of Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) made of ultracold atoms [1]. Atomic species with naturally large repulsive interactions such as 87 Rb [2] or 23 Na [3] have collision properties favorable for the preparation process. However, there is growing interest in studying Bose-Einstein condensates where the interactions can be precisely tuned, magnetic Feshbach resonances [4, 5] being a key tool in this respect. One of the main motivations is the formation of an almost ideal condensate, i.e. one with vanishing interatomic interactions. Availability of such a system is essential for studying phenomena where even a weak interaction can hide the underlying physics of interest. A noticeable example is in the field of disordered systems, where experiments performed with ideal quantum gases can shed new light on the interdisciplinary phenomenon of Anderson localization [6, 7]. An ideal BEC would also be the most appropriate source for matter-wave interferometry, combining maximal brightness with the absence of collisional decoherence [8]. The possibility of dynamically tuning the interactions in a BEC could also open new directions towards Heisenberg-limited interferometry [9]. Feshbach resonances have been observed in most of the atomic species that have been condensed so far: 23 Na [5], 85 Rb [10], 133 Cs [11, 12], 7 Li [13], 87 Rb [14], 52 Cr [15]. Magnetic tuning of the interactions to small values around zero can be performed in lithium, a possibility already exploited to realize bright solitons in a weakly attractive BEC [13]. Cesium also presents an experimentally accessible region of nearly vanishing scattering lengths at which the small internal energy of a weakly interacting cesium BEC has been investigated [12]. In this Letter we report Bose-Einstein condensation of a new atomic species, 39 K. Combination of broad Feshbach resonances and a small background scattering length -33 a 0 [16] makes this system very promising for the study of weakly interacting condensates. Direct evaporative cooling of this species had been prevented by unfavorable zero-field collisional properties [17, 18]. Sympathetic cooling with 87 Rb has recently proved [18] to work for 39 K as efficiently as for the other potassium isotopes [19, 20], but condensation was still prevented by the negative value of. We now bring 39 K to quantum degeneracy by a combination of sympathetic cooling with 87 Rb and direct evaporative cooling, exploiting the resonant tuning of both inter- and intra-species interactions at Feshbach resonances. Presence of one broad homonuclear Feshbach resonance allows us to tune in the condensate from large positive values to small negative values. The possibility of precisely adjusting around zero is demonstrated by studying the condensate expansion and its stability. The experimental techniques we use are similar to the ones we developed for the other potassium isotopes [18, 19, 20, 21]. We start by preparing a mixture of 39 K and 87 Rb atoms in a magneto-optical trap. The mixture contains about 10 9 Rb atoms at T 100 µk and 10 7 K atoms at T 300 µk. We simultaneously load the two species in a magnetic potential in their stretched Zeeman states F = 2, m F = 2 and then we perform a selective evaporation of rubidium on the hyperfine transition at 6.834 GHz (the hyperfine splitting of 39 K is 462 MHz). Potassium atoms are efficiently sympathetically cooled via interspecies collision [18], in spite of the small scattering length Rb 28 a 0 [21]. With this technique we are able to prepare after 25 s of evaporation samples containing typically 10 6 Rb atoms and 2 10 5 K atoms [22] at T=800 nk. Further cooling of the mixture in the magnetic potential in principle would be possible. However, condensation would be accompanied by collapse [23] because of the negative scattering length of 39 K at low magnetic fields. We therefore exploit the possibility of tuning to positive values by performing the last part of evaporation in an optical potential in presence of a homogeneous magnetic field. We have indeed discovered several broad Feshbach resonances for this potassium isotope [24, 25],

2 a very favorable one being in the ground state 1, 1 at about 0 G. We have also performed a detailed analysis of several of such resonances in order to construct a quantum collisional model able to accurately predict the magnetic-field dependence of [24]. We will make use of this analysis throughout this paper. The K-Rb mixture is adiabatically transferred to an optical trap created with two focused laser beams at a wavelength λ=1030 nm, with beam waists of about 100µm and crossing in the horizontal plane. The two species are then transferred to their absolute ground states 1, 1 via adiabatic rapid passage, and further cooled by reducing the power in the laser beams by means of acusto-optic modulators. The optical trap is designed in such a way to evaporate mainly Rb. We find that cooling of 39 K can be greatly enhanced by increasing Rb at one of the interspecies Feshbach resonances that exist in this mixture [21]. At a first stage lasting 2.5 s a homogeneous magnetic field is thus tuned near a 8.5 G-wide interspecies Feshbach resonance centered at 317.9 G [26]. We find that sympathetic cooling is optimized at a field of 316 G, where Rb 150 a 0. At this magnetic field the homonuclear 39 K cross-section is still small, -33 a 0. Density distribution 3 s 3.2 s 3.5 s -200 0 200-200 0 200-200 0 200 Horizontal position FIG. 1: Phase transition to a 39 K BEC. The three profiles are taken at different times during the final stage of forced evaporation in the optical trap (see Fig. 2). The profiles are obtained by vertically integrating the column density measured after release from the trap and 15 ms of ballistic expansion. When both gases are close to quantum degeneracy (T 150 nk) we make positive and large by shifting the magnetic field in proximity of a 52 G-wide 39 K resonance, centered at 2.4 G, and we continue the evaporation for 1 s. Due to the different trap depths for the two species, Rb is soon completely evaporated and further cooling of K relies just on intra-species collisions. We find for this phase an optimal scattering length 180 a 0 obtained for B=395.2 G. At this field the two species are only weakly coupled, since Rb 28 a 0. Fig. 1 shows the phase transition of the K cloud to a Bose-Einstein condensate, detected via absorption imaging after a ballistic expansion. The critical temperature we measure is around 100 nk, and our purest condensates contain typically 3 10 4 atoms. The frequencies of the optical trap at the end of the evaporation are ω=2π (65, 74, 92) s 1 in the (x, y, z) directions respectively. The whole evaporation procedure in the optical trap is summarized in Fig. 2. Laser power (arb. units) 1.0 0.5 T=800 nk B=316 G B=395.2 G = -33 a 0 Rb = 150 a 0 = 180 a 0 Rb = 28 a 0 T=150 nk 39 K BEC 0.0 0 1 2 3 Time (s) FIG. 2: Sketch of the relevant parameters of the system during the evaporation in the optical potentials. The two exponential ramps have time constants of 0.9 s and 0.45 s, respectively. Once the condensate is produced, can be further tuned. We have explored the magnetic-field region below the homonuclear Feshbach resonance in which the condensate is stable. The experiment starts with a pure BEC created at B 0 =395.2 G. The field is then adiabatically brought to a final field B in 30 ms. After 5 ms the optical trap is switched off and the cloud expands for 31.5 ms before absorption imaging is performed with a resonant beam propagating along the y direction. The magnetic field is switched off just 5 ms before imaging, to ensure that does not change during the relevant phases of the expansion. Examples of absorption images are shown in Fig. 3. The measured atom number and the mean width σ=( x 2 + z 2 ) 1/2 are shown Fig. 4, together with the magnetic-field dependence of as calculated using our quantum collision model [24]. Between 350.2 G and 350.0 G we observe a sudden drop of the atom number that can be attributed to a collapse [23] of the BEC for too large negative. In this regime the sample is no more in equilibrium and the presence of strong excitations is evident, see leftmost panels in Fig. 3. On the other extreme, the field can be brought in proximity of the resonance center. Here we observe that 349.3 G 350.0 G 350.2 G 352.7 G 354.7 G 361.7 G 395.2 G FIG. 3: Sample images of a 39 K condensate at various magnetic fields in the vicinity of the 52 G-wide Feshbach resonance centered at 2.4 G, taken after 31.5 ms of expansion. The field of view is 300 300 µm. The size shrinks as the scattering length is decreased, and the condensate eventually collapses for negative.

3 Atom number (a 0 ) 000 20000 0 70 60 50 30 0 200 0-200 a) b) c) 3 350 360 370 380 390 0 410 B (G) FIG. 4: (color online) Tuning the interaction in a 39 K condensate. a) atom number; b) width of the cloud after 31.5 ms of ballistic expansion; c) theory prediction for the scattering length. The two dashed lines indicate the expected position of the zero-crossing and resonance center. Condensates are either fitted with a Thomas-Fermi profile (circles) in the region of large interactions or a gaussian profile (dots) in the region of weak interactions. Atom number and width of uncondensed clouds are directly extracted from the raw images (triangles). Each data point is the average of at least three measurements. the BEC is depleted by three-body recombination, whose rate scales as a 4 K [27] close to a Feshbach resonance. For example, the lifetime of the BEC in the optical trap, which is typically around 3 s, is shortened to about 200 ms when the field is set to 399.2 G, where =4 () G. The width of the condensate after the expansion shown in Fig. 4b features a decrease by almost a factor three as the field strength shifts from the resonance to the zerocrossing region. This is due to the variation of the interaction strength in the condensate. At the long expansion time of this experiment σ E rel, where E rel is the release energy of the condensate. The latter quantity is expected to decrease as a 2/5 K in the Thomas-Fermi limit, i.e. for large positive. Its value equals the kinetic energy of the harmonic oscillator ground state for =0, and becomes even smaller for < 0. The sharp increase of the width below 350.2 G reported in Fig. 4 reflects the presence of excitations in the collapsed system. To gain insight into the observed phenomenology, we have compared the condensate widths with numerical calculations based on the Gross-Pitaevskii theory [28]. In Fig. 5 we plot σ as a function of ; here the abscissa values for the experimental data have been calculated using the theoretical (B) [24]. The horizontal error bar is dominated by the uncertainty in the model for (B), which amounts to about 0.27 a 0 in the zero-crossing region. The decrease in σ with decreasing is the result of two general effects: i) a reduction of the condensate width in the trap; ii) a reduction of the interaction energy released during the first phases of the expansion. Note in Fig. 5a the good agreement between theory and experiment in the broad range of values of in which the condensate is stable. The slow decrease of σ for moderately large and positive is followed by a faster decrease in the region of the zero-crossing. 80 60 20 30 20 a) 0 100 200 300 0 (a 0 ) b) -1.5-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 (a 0 ) FIG. 5: (color online) a) Scattering-length dependence of measured (dots) and calculated (lines) mean width σ. The two dashed lines indicate the range of variation of σ due to a 30% systematic uncertainty on atom numbers. b) Zoom into the zero-crossing region. Both condensed samples (dots) and collapsed samples (triangles) are shown. The horizontal error bars are determined by the uncertainty on (B). The hatched region indicates the critical for collapse as predicted by the numerical calculation, including its variation due to the uncertainty in the atom number. In Fig. 5b we compare theory and experiment on a much smaller region around the zero-crossing, including also the experimental data points corresponding to a collapsed cloud. The hatched region indicates the critical scattering length for collapse a c =-0.57(20) a 0 predicted by the theory for the nominal atom number we had in this experiment, N=3.5 10 4. The width of the cloud keeps on decreasing as gets negative and increases again at collapse. In this experiment collapse is appar-

4 ently happening at a slightly subcritical scattering length =-0.2(3) a 0. This might be due to a loss of adiabaticity of our magnetic-field ramp in this region of negative. Although the ramp duration is much longer than the trap period, it might still excite the monopole collective mode of the condensate which has a vanishing frequency for approaching a c [29]. In conclusion, we have produced a Bose-Einstein condensate of 39 K atoms in which the scattering length can be precisely tuned over a large range and adjusted around zero. This atomic species is particularly advantageous in producing a weakly interacting condensate, since it combines a broad Feshbach resonance with a small background scattering length. For this resonance the theoretical model [24] predicts a sensitivity d /db 0.55 a 0 /G around 350 G. Therefore, a magnetic-field stability of the order of 0.1 G will in principle allow us to tune the scattering length to zero to better than 0.1 a 0 in future experiments. This degree of control appears superior to that achievable in most other species which present either narrower resonances and/or larger background scattering lengths, the only exception being 7 Li [13]. A weakly interacting 39 K Bose gas may have a variety of applications, ranging from Anderson localization of matter-waves to high-sensitivity atom interferometry. We note that the in-trap size of a the weakly-interacting condensate is comparable to that of the ground state of the trapping potential, that is h/mω = 1.84 µm in the present experiment. Such small size opens interesting perspectives for inertial measurements with high spatial resolution [30]. We expect that also a binary 39 K- 87 Rb BEC can be efficiently produced, thus enriching the possibilities offered by potassium-rubidium mixtures. Such binary condensate could be used for various applications and is especially appealing for the production of ultracold heteronuclear molecules. We are indebted to F. Minardi and L. De Sarlo for precious suggestions. We thank M. Fattori, F. Ferlaino, F. Marin and all the other members of the Quantum Gases group at LENS for contributions and useful discussions, and M. De Pas, M. Giuntini, A. Montori, R. Ballerini, and A. Hajeb for technical assistance. This work was supported by MIUR, by EU under contracts HPRICT1999-00111 and MEIF-CT-2004-009939, by INFN, by Ente CRF, Firenze and by CNISM, Progetti di Innesco 2005. [1] K. Burnett, P. S. Julienne, P. D. Lett, E. Tiesinga, and C. J. Williams, Nature (London) 416, 225 (2002). [2] M. H. Anderson, et al., Science 269, 198 (1995). [3] K. B. Davis, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995). [4] E. Tiesinga, B. J. Verhaar, H. T. C. Stoof, Phys. Rev. A 47, 4114 (1993). [5] S. Inoyue, M. R. Andrews, J. Stenger, H.-J. Miesner, D.M. Stamper-Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Nature 392, 151 (1998). [6] P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958). [7] See for example J. E. Lye, L. Fallani, C. Fort, V. Guarrera, M. Modugno, D. S. Wiersma, M. Inguscio, cond-mat/0611146, and references therein. [8] B. P. Anderson and M. A. Kasevich, Science 282, 1686 (1998); Y. Shin, M. Saba, T. A. Pasquini, W. Ketterle, D. E. Pritchard, and A. E. Leanhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 0505 (2004); G. Roati, E. de Mirandes, F. Ferlaino, H. Ott, G. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 2302 (2004). [9] P. Bouyer and M. A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1083 (1997); L. Pezzè, L. A. Collins, A. Smerzi, G. P. Berman, and A. R. Bishop, Phys. Rev. A 72 043612 (2005); G.-B. Jo, Y. Shin, S. Will, T. A. Pasquini, M. Saba, W. Ketterle, D. E. Pritchard, M. Vengalattore, and M. Prentiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 0307 (2007). [10] J. L. Roberts, N. R. Claussen, James P. Burke, Jr., Chris H. Greene, E. A. Cornell, and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5109 (1998). [11] C. Chin, V. Vuletic, A. J. Kerman, S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett, 85, 2717 (2000). [12] T. Weber, J. Herbig, M. Mark, H.-C. Nägerl, R. Grimm, Science 299, 232 (2003). [13] L. Khaykovich, F. Schreck, G. Ferrari, T. Bourdel, J. Cubizolles, L. D. Carr, Y. Castin, C. Salomon, Science 296, 1290 (2002); K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge, A. G. Truscott, R. G. Hulet, Nature 417, 150 (2002). [14] A. Marte, T. Volz, J. Schuster, S. Dürr, G. Rempe, E. G. M. van Kempen, and B. J. Verhaar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 283202 (2002). [15] J. Werner, A. Griesmaier, S. Hensler, J. Stuhler, T. Pfau, A. Simoni, and E. Tiesinga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 183201 (2005). [16] H. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. A 62, 052704 (2000); T. Loftus, C. A. Regal, C. Ticknor, J. L. Bohn, and D. S. Jin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 173201 (2002). [17] M. Prevedelli, F. S. Cataliotti, E. A. Cornell, J. R. Ensher, C. Fort, L. Ricci, G. M. Tino, and M. Inguscio, Phys. Rev. A 59, 886 (1999). [18] L. De Sarlo, P. Maioli, G. Barontini, J. Catani, F. Minardi, and M. Inguscio, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022715 (2007). [19] G. Modugno, G. Ferrari, G. Roati, F. Riboli, R. J. Brecha, A. Simoni, M. Inguscio, Science 294, 1320 (2001). [20] G. Roati, F. Riboli, G. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 1503 (2002). [21] F. Ferlaino, C. D Errico, G. Roati, M. Zaccanti, M. Inguscio, G. Modugno, A. Simoni, Phys. Rev. A 73, 0702(R) (2006). [22] The decrease of the potassium atom number is due to spin-exchange inelastic collisions with Rb atoms in states other than 2, 2. [23] J. M. Gerton, D. Strekalov, I. Prodan and R. G. Hulet, Nature (London) 8, 6813 (2000); J. L. Roberts, N. R. Claussen, S. L. Cornish, E. A. Donley, E. A. Cornell, and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4211 (2001). [24] A. Simoni et al., in preparation. [25] Indication of these resonances has been obtained also in an experiment at the University of Innsbruck: commu-

5 nication at Wilhelm und Else Heraeus-Seminar on Cold Molecules, Bad Honnef (Germany), 2006. [26] We find this resonance at a magnetic field very close to the value predicted in [21]. A detailed analysis of Feshbach resonances in this mixture will be the subject of a future publication. [27] T. Weber, J. Herbig, M. Mark, H.-C. Nägerl,and R. Grimm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 123201 (2003); B. D. Esry, Chris H. Greene, and James P. Burke, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1751 (1999). [28] F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999). [29] S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2360 (1996). [30] I. Carusotto, L. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, G. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 093202 (2005).