Ethiopia. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Similar documents
Bahamas. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Belize. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Ghana. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Suriname. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Fiji. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

South Africa. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Cook Islands. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Cameroon. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Tanzania. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Vanuatu. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Mali. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Congo. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Equatorial Guinea. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Protected Areas Information Management Systems and Challenges in Korea Hong, Suk-Hwan. Pusan National University

World Database on Protected Areas User Manual 1.5

ACRONYMS AREAS COUNTRIES MARINE TERMS

WELCOME & INTRODUCTION

Indicator : Coverage of protected areas in relation to marine areas

Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management Project

Data Sources and Methods for the Protected Areas Indicators. July 2012

Subject: Request for tenders: GIS Specialist Consultant Pacific Islands Protected Area Portal (PIPAP)

1. The dataset Protected Areas was filtered, removing only sites with: a. Status = Adopted, Designated, Inscribed, and Not Reported.

Welcome to side event. Internationally Designated Areas and their Synergies

Protected Planet National Technical Series: Republic of Korea

Calculating the Natura 2000 network area in Europe: The GIS approach

Monitoring of Tropical Deforestation and Land Cover Changes in Protected Areas: JRC Perspective

Country Fiche Lithuania

Documentation for the Natural Resource Protection and Child Health Indicators, 2017 Release

Statutory framework of the world network of biosphere reserves UNESCO General Conference 1996

Strategies for biodiversity conservation

Data Sources and Methods for the Protected Areas Indicators. August 2014

IN THE ZONE? Nature and culture in a Swedish Biosphere Reserve. Katarina Saltzman Department of Conservation University of Gothenburg

The Governance of Land Use

West-Estonian Archipelago Biosphere Reserve and Lima Action Plan

Contents: LEVANTE DE ALMERÍA A INFORMATION SYSTEM OBJECTIVES AND ACTIONS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM RESULTS

EABRN, 20 years of History and its Future (East Asia Biosphere Reserve Network)

Country Fiche Latvia Updated October 2016

HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

HELCOM-VASAB Maritime Spatial Planning Working Group Twelfth Meeting Gdansk, Poland, February 2016

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY ON BIOSPHERE RESERVES

The Role of Wilderness in Climate Change Adaptation

An Update on Land Use & Land Cover Mapping in Ireland

3.3 Threats to Biodiversity

The European Union and its Overseas Entities

Statutory Framework of Biosphere Reserves. The Statutory Framework of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves

EuroGEOSS Protected Areas Pilot

Management Planning & Implementation of Communication Measures for Terrestrial Natura 2000 Sites in the Maltese Islands Epsilon-Adi Consortium

Vladimir Krever, Mikhail Stishov, Irina Onufrenya

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY FOR BIOSPHERE RESERVES

PAD-US (CBI Edition) Version 2: Standards and Procedures

Puakea, Hawaiÿi. Puakea, Hawaiÿi WATERSHED FEATURES

Dr Ozlem Adiyaman Earth Sciences and Geo-hazards Risk Reduction Section Division of Ecological and Earth Sciences ( ) NATURAL SCIENCES

ARCH PROJET Activity 1 -Synthesis-

Keanahalululu Gulch, Hawaiÿi

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. Session 7. Breakout discussion. discuss on regional and interregional. proposals 1. COLLABORATION BETWEEN PROGRAMMES

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

PROMOTING NATURE CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE RURAL AREAS OF HONG KONG

Coverage of protected areas

DELIVERING ECOSYSTEM- BASED MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING IN PRACTICE

PROPOSED UNESCO FUNDY BIOSPHERE RESERVE

KENYA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS Workshop on

Global Distribution of Coral Reefs

Subregional Cooperation for Strengthening Marine Protected Areas in North-East Asia

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

SWOS (The Satellite-based Wetland Observation Service) Satellite images for peatland monitoring and management Kathrin Weise, Jena-Optronik GmbH

Ecologically or Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs) in the Convention on Biological Diversity Arctic EBSA workshop as an example

SIF_7.1_v2. Indicator. Measurement. What should the measurement tell us?

Community based approaches to natural resource management governance and the role of government

Gambia Gap Analysis and Spatial Conservation Prioritisation

The Governance of Land Use

Ontario s Niagara Escarpment A UNESCO World Biosphere Reserve

Additional information (material for interactions and analysis chapter) to document 3/1, the PLAN BOTHNIA MSP Assessment

GIS Data, Technology, and Models. to Integrate Information and Improve Transportation Decision-Making. within the Eco-Logical* Framework for Oregon

Carpathians Unite mechanism of consultation and cooperation for implementation of the Carpathian Convention

United Nations. List of Protected Areas. ,,j.j ^WCPA. lucn. ^K^BV WORLD COMMISSION ^^ ^t^ H UNEP WCMC ON PROTECTED AREAS. The World Conservation Union

The Governance of Land Use

Metadata Drava & Mura River Basins (Austria)

1. Project information Jardines de la Reina National Park: Technical support to strengthen management & World Heritage nomination preparation

CAMP SLOVENIA. Mezek Slavko RRC Koper. Project coordinator November 2005

Global Distribution of Northern Fur Seals (2013)

Grant agreement number:

Ocean planning as a tool for blue growth and smart specialization - Frederico Cardigos -

cooperating sites as the three initial units of a new Southern Appalachian Biosphere Reserve, approved by UNESCO in 1988.

Biosphere Reserves : Bureaucratic Label or Sustainable Landscape. KAERA COETZER, BFN Erasmus, ETF Witkowski

How important is to be a Biosphere Reserve of UNESCO? The case of Berlenga Islands (Peniche Portugal)

The World Bank. Key Dates. Project Development Objectives. Components. Public Disclosure Authorized. Implementation Status & Results Report

TOWARDS STRATEGIC SPATIAL PLANNING IN JAMAICA: THE NATIONAL SPATIAL PLAN

Maritime Spatial Planning: Transboundary Cooperation in the Celtic Seas Looking Ahead

U.S. Marine Protected Areas Boundaries: MPA Inventory

Why do we need a global framework for MPAs in ABNJ? Kristina M. Gjerde IUCN High Seas Policy Advisor

BURGAS CASE STUDY: LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS

Other effective area based conservation. The case of Colombia

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Executive Board

Turkey National Report

The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan and Marine Spatial Planning

Towards coherent maritime spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region, transnational and project perspective Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat

The 26 th Session of the International Coordination Council of the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme (10-13 June 2014 UNESCO) NATIONAL REPORT

Ecosystem-Based Approach in MSP

The Establishment of a Database on Current Research in UNESCO Biosphere Reserves: Limitations and Opportunities

POLICY: FI/PL/03 Issued on August 5, Fee Policy for GEF Partner Agencies

Transcription:

WDPA Data Status Report About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) Map showing protected areas in the WDPA Ethiopia January 2015 The WDPA is the most comprehensive global dataset on terrestrial and marine protected areas, incorporating the official UN List of Protected Areas. The WDPA dataset is not necessarily a complete representation of all the protected areas which have been designated in country. The quality of the WDPA depends on the accessibility of accurate, comprehensive, up-to-date protected areas information from data holders. This report describes the current status of data in the WDPA for all sites included in the January 2015 monthly release for Ethiopia. The WDPA is updated each month, and the information in this factsheet may have been superseded by a more recent update. This fact sheet has been produced with support from the 10th European Development Fund through the BIOPAMA (Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management) Programme. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of UNEP-WCMC and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union nor of the ACP Secretariat. The boundaries and names shown, and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. ETH Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 1 of 5

Protected areas data in the WDPA for Ethiopia There are 104 protected area records stored in the WDPA for Ethiopia, 101 are national-level protected areas with 3 designated under international and regional agreements or conventions. 91% of the data have boundaries in polygon format, with the remaining 9% depicted in point format (i.e. a single latitude and longitude point for the protected area). See Figure 1. Figure 1: Ratio of points to polygons 9% Polygons Points 91% Of the 104 protected areas, none contain a marine a component. Data for protected areas designated under international conventions and agreements There are 3 protected areas in the WDPA designated under international or regional conventions or agreements. 1 is a World Heritage Site (WHS); 2 are UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Reserves (MAB). See Figure 2. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Figure 2: Number of WHS, Ramsar and MAB sites WHS Ramsar MAB Data for national-level protected areas There are 101 national-level protected area records in the WDPA. IUCN Management Categories have been reported for 41 of these records. The remaining 60 are recorded as Not Reported. Figure 3 shows the allocation of IUCN Management Categories across national-level protected area records in the WDPA (numbers of sites in each category are shown in Table 2 at the end of this report). Figure 3: National-level protected areas by IUCN Management Category NR, 59% II, 15% IV, 8% VI, 18% ETH Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 2 of 5

Completeness of WDPA Data Attributes for Ethiopia The WDPA requires that a minimum set of information is provided with each protected area record. These data attributes are defined by the WDPA Data Standard. Table 1 shows the extent to which key attributes have been reported by data providers for all protected area records in the WDPA for Ethiopia. Table 1: Completeness of selected attributes Attribute Completeness IUCN Category 42% Status (designated or proposed) % Status Year 44% Governance Type 0% Management Authority 0% Link to Management Plan 0% The WDPA Data Standard can be accessed at http://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data. Data sources in the WDPA for Ethiopia Data in the WDPA have been obtained or validated from 6 sources for Ethiopia. Figure 4 shows the breakdown of when protected area records in the WDPA were last updated or validated. Figure 4: Percentage of records updated or validated by year 2% 4% 2%<1% Data for protected areas designated under international agreements and conventions have been sourced from the relevant convention secretariat. This includes: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Ramsar Convention Secretariat and UNESCO Man and The Biosphere Programme. Not reported 2004-2008 <1999 91% 2009-2011 1999-2003 2012-2014 Data for national-level protected areas in the WDPA have been sourced from national authorities wherever possible. Information may also be supplemented by data from other agencies or organisations working in each country. As part of the update process for national data, national authorities are given the opportunity to review, validate and, where necessary, edit all existing WDPA records for their country. All updates to the WDPA by national authorities take priority over other sources and are considered to be the authoritative version. There is one record in the WDPA with no reported source for Ethiopia. The top three sources for national-level data in Ethiopia are: State Forest Conservation and Development Department; Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Organisation (EWCO); Head of Wildlife Conservation Department, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Federal Republic of Ethiopia. ETH Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 3 of 5

Table 2: WDPA Data for Ethiopia (as of January 2015) Polygons Points Total Realm: terrestrial or marine Terrestrial 95 9 104 Marine (partially or completely) 0 0 0 Status: designated or proposed Designated 38 9 47 Proposed 57 0 57 Status not reported 0 0 0 International Protected Areas 2 1 3 UNESCO World Heritage Sites 1 0 1 Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar sites) 0 0 0 UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves 1 1 2 Regional Protected Areas 0 0 0 Baltic Sea Protected Area (HELCOM) 0 0 0 Cartagena Special Protected Area 0 0 0 Marine Protected Area (CCAMLR) 0 0 0 Marine Protected Area (OSPAR) 0 0 0 Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 0 0 0 Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) 0 0 0 Specially Protected Area of Marine Importance (Barcelona Conv.) 0 0 0 National Protected Areas: IUCN Management Category 93 8 101 Ia: Strict Nature Reserve 0 0 0 Ib: Wilderness Area 0 0 0 II: National Park 10 5 15 III: National Monument or Feature 0 0 0 IV: Habitat/species management area 8 0 8 V: Protected Area with sustainable use 0 0 0 VI: Protected Landscape/Seascape 17 1 18 Not Reported (NR) 58 2 60 Total number of records in the WDPA for Ethiopia 95 9 104 ETH Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 4 of 5

WDPA Quality Indicators for Ethiopia The percentage of records with boundaries in polygon format The WDPA stores all records with spatial (location) data. These data can be polygons which represent the boundaries of the protected area, or a single latitude/longitude point which shows the general location of the protected area. This indicator shows the percentage of records with boundaries - the preferred spatial data. 91 0 95 The percentage of data attributes which have been reported by the data provider Each record in the WDPA has 25 fields for which data attributes are requested. This indicator shows the weighted percentage of data fields which have been reported, based on the minimum, core and complete attributes. 82 63 88 99 The percentage of records updated or validated by the data provider in the last 5 years UNEP-WCMC sets a target to update each record in the WDPA at least every five years. This indicator shows the percentage of records updated in the last 5 years (since January 2010). 3 0 91 The percentage of records where the area of the polygon is within 5% of the area reported The area (km 2 ) reported for a protected area may sometimes differ from the calculated GIS area of the boundary polygon provided, possibly indicating a discrepancy within the information submitted. This indicator shows the percentage of records where the area of the polygon is within a threshold of 5% of the area reported. The threshold allows for differences due to projections and software used for calculating the GIS area. 27 0 67 0 The range of scores for individual countries in the WDPA Country score for Ethiopia in January 2015 (solid circle) and 2014 (dotted circle) Overall score for the WDPA ETH Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 5 of 5