TODA-LLY COOL STUFF BARBARA SHIPMAN

Similar documents
The Finite Non-Periodic Toda Lattice: A Geometric And Topological Viewpoint

A LITTLE TASTE OF SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: THE SCHUR-HORN THEOREM CONTENTS

How long does it take to compute the eigenvalues of a random symmetric matrix?

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

1.4 Solvable Lie algebras

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM

A little taste of symplectic geometry

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 3 6 April 2010

Algebra Questions. May 13, Groups 1. 2 Classification of Finite Groups 4. 3 Fields and Galois Theory 5. 4 Normal Forms 9

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

Jordan Canonical Form Homework Solutions

Notation. For any Lie group G, we set G 0 to be the connected component of the identity.

Linear Algebra 2 Spectral Notes

Smooth and Discrete Integrable Systems and Optimal Control. In honor of Darryl Holm s 60th Birthday

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 7 11 May 2010

CHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 10.

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Compound matrices and some classical inequalities

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS

Combinatorics and geometry of E 7

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

Topics in Representation Theory: SU(n), Weyl Chambers and the Diagram of a Group

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 2.

Lecture 11 The Radical and Semisimple Lie Algebras

LECTURE 3 MATH 261A. Office hours are now settled to be after class on Thursdays from 12 : 30 2 in Evans 815, or still by appointment.

Linear Algebra II Lecture 13

Symmetric Spaces Toolkit

GRE Subject test preparation Spring 2016 Topic: Abstract Algebra, Linear Algebra, Number Theory.

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

On the Irreducibility of the Commuting Variety of the Symmetric Pair so p+2, so p so 2

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Representations of Matrix Lie Algebras

Representation Theory

IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS. Contents

THE FULL KOSTANT-TODA HIERARCHY ON THE POSITIVE FLAG VARIETY

Linear Algebra Review

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

Mic ael Flohr Representation theory of semi-simple Lie algebras: Example su(3) 6. and 20. June 2003

Multiplicity free actions of simple algebraic groups

Group Theory. 1. Show that Φ maps a conjugacy class of G into a conjugacy class of G.

Simple Lie algebras. Classification and representations. Roots and weights

The Toda Lattice. Chris Elliott. April 9 th, 2014

A Cartan subalgebra of g is a maximal abelian subalgebra h Ă g consisting of semisimple (diagonalizeable) elements. (Analogous to Jucys-Murphy

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights

A little taste of symplectic geometry

Homogeneous spaces admitting transitive semigroups

LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)

The Cartan Decomposition of a Complex Semisimple Lie Algebra

1 Fields and vector spaces

Definition (T -invariant subspace) Example. Example

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Complex Structures

Cartan s Criteria. Math 649, Dan Barbasch. February 26

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n

ALGEBRA 8: Linear algebra: characteristic polynomial

Definition 9.1. The scheme µ 1 (O)/G is called the Hamiltonian reduction of M with respect to G along O. We will denote by R(M, G, O).

Jordan normal form notes (version date: 11/21/07)

UC Berkeley Summer Undergraduate Research Program 2015 July 9 Lecture

Group Theory - QMII 2017

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

AMS10 HW7 Solutions. All credit is given for effort. (-5 pts for any missing sections) Problem 1 (20 pts) Consider the following matrix 2 A =

An Exactly Solvable 3 Body Problem

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

A Convexity Theorem For Isoparametric Submanifolds

AN EXTENSION OF YAMAMOTO S THEOREM ON THE EIGENVALUES AND SINGULAR VALUES OF A MATRIX

arxiv:math-ph/ v1 25 Feb 2002

COMBINATORIAL CURVE NEIGHBORHOODS FOR THE AFFINE FLAG MANIFOLD OF TYPE A 1 1

LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS

Page Points Possible Points. Total 200

x 3y 2z = 6 1.2) 2x 4y 3z = 8 3x + 6y + 8z = 5 x + 3y 2z + 5t = 4 1.5) 2x + 8y z + 9t = 9 3x + 5y 12z + 17t = 7

Contents. Preface for the Instructor. Preface for the Student. xvii. Acknowledgments. 1 Vector Spaces 1 1.A R n and C n 2

QUALIFYING EXAM IN ALGEBRA August 2011

PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Classification of semisimple Lie algebras

Subspace stabilizers and maximal subgroups of exceptional groups of Lie type

Margulis Superrigidity I & II

NONCOMMUTATIVE POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS. Edward S. Letzter. Introduction

Math 205, Summer I, Week 4b: Continued. Chapter 5, Section 8

SYMMETRIES OF SECTIONAL CURVATURE ON 3 MANIFOLDS. May 27, 1992

Math 3191 Applied Linear Algebra

Math 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups

Compression, Matrix Range and Completely Positive Map

The Jordan Canonical Form

Index. for generalized eigenvalue problem, butterfly form, 211

Representation Theory and Orbital Varieties. Thomas Pietraho Bowdoin College

Plan What is a normal formal of a mathematical object? Similarity and Congruence Transformations Jordan normal form and simultaneous diagonalisation R

Representations of semisimple Lie algebras

Half the sum of positive roots, the Coxeter element, and a theorem of Kostant

Exercises on chapter 1

WOMP 2001: LINEAR ALGEBRA. 1. Vector spaces

Von Neumann algebras and ergodic theory of group actions

Transcription:

TODA-LLY COOL STUFF BARBARA SHIPMAN. Introduction to the Toda Lattice Finite non-periodic Toda lattice Toda, 967: Dynamical system: a system of n collinear particles with positions q,..., q n Repelling force between adjacent particles: F r = e r Potential Energy: F r = V r, so V r = e r Total energy: H p, q = n n p 2 i + e q i+ q i 2 Hamilton s equations: The resulting equations are: q j = p j i= i= ṗ j = H q j, q j = H p j ṗ = e q 2 q ṗ j = e q j+ q j + e q j q j ṗ n = e qn q n It is not clear how to solve this system. Change of variables and inverse scattering solution Flaschka, 972. Recall any equation like L = [L, B], then the spectrum of L is preserved under this flow. The reason is that tr L k = tr L k = tr [ L k, B ] prove by induction, which is zero. L, B is called a Lax pair. Let Let a j = e q j+ q j > 0, j =...n b j = p j, j =...n; b j = c b. a X J = X =... Jacobi matrix,.. Π N X = 0 0 a n a......... 0 a n 0 b n

2 BARBARA Then the Jacobi matrix has distinct, real eigenvalues, and the dynamical system now is Ẋ t = [ X t, Π N X t ], H t = 2 tr X 2 Constants of motion: H k = k tr X k, k = 2,..., n, also tr X. So it is completely integrable. Note each H k has its own flow [X Ẋ t = t, Π N X t ] k. The flows give coordinates on n-dimensional isospectral set within the phase space that is 2n-dimensional. There are many generalizations of this obtained by extending or changing the phase space on which the Toda lattice is defined. There are many differences in structure of the isospectral sets, some of which are subtle, some of which are qualitatively very different. Many have used these flows to study the topology of the isospectral sets in different versions of the Toda lattice. A standard inverse scattering scheme can be used to solve these equations. That is, suppose in general that we have the matrix equation L = [L, B]. This is equivalent to the following system of equations: Lφ = φλ φ = Bφ where φ is the matrix of eigenvectors of L, and Λ is the diagonal matrix of corresponding eigenvalues which are constant under the flow, since the flow is isospectral. Note that from the first equation and the fact that we have Lφ + L φ = φλ, or Lφ LBφ = BLφ, so L = [L, B]. Note that all steps are reversible, so that these systems are equivalent. Now, suppose we are given the initial matrix L 0, such that L 0 φ 0 = φ 0 Λ. Since L = φλφ, we can express Bφ entirely in terms of φ and Λ. Then you get an IVP for a system of ODEs for φ t. You can solve that, and then you can of course obtain L t. Symmetric version of Toda lattice: b α b. α X s =......... αn = D a..... D, α n b n a n b n where a i = α 2 i > 0, D = diag, α,..., α n. New equations: Ẋ s = [X s, Skew X s ] H s = 2 tr X 2 s,

where Skew X s = TODA LATTICE 3 0 α. α..... α n α n 0 There is a - correspondence between the symmetric X s and the Jacobian X J from before. There are several Factorization Solutions : For the Jacobian version of the problem: Ẋ = [ X, Π N X ] if we write then the solution is X 0 = X 0 ; e tx 0 = n t b + t 0 0 = 0 0, 0 0 X t = n t X 0 n t. The flow exists for all time t R, as long as a i > 0 for all i. If not all of the a i are > 0, then the factorization may fail. But you can still do an inverse scattering solution Kodama, McLaughlin, Ye, 996. The symmetric version: if we write then the solution is Ẋ = [X, Skew X] X 0 = X 0 ; e tx 0 = k t b + t = SO n matrix 0, 0 0 X t = k t X 0 k t. The flow exists for all time, and factorization always works, for *any* α i R Symes, 979. Work that has been done on Toda lattice: Finite nonperiodic Toda lattice Finite periodic Toda lattice where you add force between first and last particle semi-infinite Toda lattices full-symmetric real X s : Deift, Li, Nanda, Tomei tridiagonal, real X s : Flaschka, Tomei, Kodama, Symes, McLaughlin, Moser

4 BARBARA 0 complex: full Hessenberg Jacobi form X J = : Ercolani, Flaschka, Shipman, Singer complex tridiagonal Jacobi form: Ercolani, Flaschka, Haine real tridiagonal Jacobi form: Kodama, Ye, Flaschke, Gekhtman Nonabelian Toda lattices: Bloch, Gekhtman, Koelling complex semisimple Lie algebras: Gekhtman, Shapiro 2. Geometry of the Toda flows 2.. Example where factorization fails. Let X 0 = e tx 0 + t t t 0 = = t t = n t b + t. t +t + t t 0 +t Then Then X t = n t X 0 n t = e X 0 = 0 0 0 0 If t, let B = upper triangular matrices +t +t 2 +t 2 0, t, t X t n t modb in SL 2 B flag mfld = n t b + t modb = e tx 0 modb The latter is defined for all t R. In the flag manifold, when t =, we have e X 0 0 modb = 0 modb Note that SL 2 B = N B B N 0 0 = big cell pt = circle B B So we have completed the flow.

TODA LATTICE 5 2.2. Generalizations and geometry. Jacobi complex version: Let J be the set of matrices b. a X =........ such that b i = 0, a i, b i C The complex dimension is 2n 2. The Hamiltonians are H k = k + tr X k+ for k =,..., n. From these you get flows Ẋ t k = [ X t k, Π X k t k ], t k C. These n Hamiltonians cut out an isospectral subset T Λ. If a j = 0, this is preserved under the flow. Let e t kx k = n t k b t k = lower triangular, s on diag upper triangular B. Then the solution is X t k = n t k X o n t k. We use the flows to study geometry of T Λ. The fixed points of the flows are where all a j = 0. Take X T Λ, and say the characteristic poly is a n λ n s 2 λ n 2 s 3 λ n 3... s n. The companion matrix is the rational canonical form 0...... C Λ =.... 0 s n... s 3 s 2 0 0 0 Theorem 2.. Kostant There exists a unique L = 0 such that X = LC Λ L. The -dimensional eigenspace of each λ is spanned by λ v λ = λ 2.. λ n Let J Λ be the Jordan canonical form in T Λ with fixed ordering of eigenvalues. Let W be the matrix of generalized eigenvectors so that C Λ = W J Λ W. b n

6 BARBARA Take X 0 T Λ. Then we write X 0 = LC Λ L = LW J Λ W L We will map X 0 to the flag manifold SL n C mod B. The map is Consider X 0 W L modb. X t k = n t k X o n t k = n LW J Λ W L n, so L n is the unique L from the Kostant Theorem. Thus, it maps to W L n t k modb = W L e t kx k 0 modb The right hand side is a complete flow completion of the flow X t k.we see W L n t k modb = W L e t klw J Λ W L k = e t kj Λ k W L modb This the k th flow in SL n C mod B. So the flow acts on the initial condition. These flows generate an n -dimensional group action. If the eigenvalues are distinct, this gives the action of the diagonal subgroup on the flag manifold. This group A Λ is the stabilizer of J Λ in SL n C under conjugation. If the eigenvalues are not distinct, it is more complicated than the diagonal matrices. α α 2... α n. A Λ = blocks of... α2. α The moment map will map into a polytope in the weight lattice corresponding to the group. 3. The moment map Let G be a complex semisimple Lie group. Let H be a Cartan subgroup maximal torus maximal abelian diagonalizable eg diagonal subgroup in SL n, C. Let g and h be the corresponding Lie algebras. Let h R = Hom R h, R. Let σ : g gl V be a representation of g G. Note that h acts on V with simultaneous eigenspaces. So V = α A V α, where A is the set of weights of V. Note that if g = sl n, C, h h =... : h i = 0 For every H h, if v α is an eigenvector of h then h n H v = α H v α

TODA LATTICE 7 So α h R, ie α : h R is called the weight, and v α is called a weight vector. And V α is the span of eigenvectors corresponding to weight α. For example, if g = sl 3, C. Then h = h h 2 : h i = 0 h. 3 Let if v α = e, so α h = h, so V α = span {e }. Let V be an irreducible representation of g. Then consider the projectivization P V. Then g acts on P V. There is a highest weight vector v α. Then you obtain an orbit G [v α ] = G P P V. Consider the adjoint representation of sl 3, C on V = sl 3, C. Then P sl 3, C = CP 7. Then choose a highest weight vector: v α = 0 0 0 0 0 = e e 3 0 0 0 e e e 2. Then g SL 3, C acts on this weight vector by g e e e 2 = ge ge ge 2. = first column span of first two columns So the orbit is a flag manifold, and the stabilizer is B = 0 0 0. Next we want to use the moment map to understand the Toda flows. The moment map is a map µ : G P h R. For X G [v α ], we write it as a linear combination of unit weight vectors: X = α A Π α X v α Then we let µ [X] = α A Π α X 2 α α A Π α X 2 Then the image µ G P is the weight polytope of V. Then H acts on G P by conjugation. The fixed points of the H-action are the vertices of weight polytope. For our example, they are the six points e i e i e j, and the weight polytope is a hexagon. Theorem 3.. Convexity theorem - Atiyah Given [X] G [v α ]. Then the closure of the torus orbits H [X] = orbit H [X] with lower-dimensional orbits of H in the boundary.

8 BARBARA Department of Mathematics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA E-mail address: bshipman@uta.edu