Fig 2. Light curves resulting from the source trajectories in the maps of Fig. 1.

Similar documents
A CHARACTERISTIC PLANETARY FEATURE IN DOUBLE-PEAKED, HIGH-MAGNIFICATION MICROLENSING EVENTS

Gravitational microlensing: an original technique to detect exoplanets

Observational and modeling techniques in microlensing planet searches

Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro

Project Observations and Analysis in 2016 and Beyond

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 Jul 2003

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 9 Aug 2001

Microlensing (planet detection): theory and applications

Conceptual Themes for the 2017 Sagan Summer Workshop

Searching for extrasolar planets using microlensing

REU Final Presentation

Exoplanet Microlensing Surveys with WFIRST and Euclid. David Bennett University of Notre Dame

Frequency of Exoplanets Beyond the Snow Line from 6 Years of MOA Data Studying Exoplanets in Their Birthplace

The Gravitational Microlensing Planet Search Technique from Space

Ground Based Gravitational Microlensing Searches for Extra-Solar Terrestrial Planets Sun Hong Rhie & David Bennett (University of Notre Dame)

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 2 May 2007

L2 point vs. geosynchronous orbit for parallax effect by simulations

NOT ENOUGH MACHOS IN THE GALACTIC HALO. Éric AUBOURG EROS, CEA-Saclay

Microlensing Parallax with Spitzer

Microlensing Planets (and Beyond) In the Era of Large Surveys Andy Gould (OSU)

Scott Gaudi The Ohio State University. Results from Microlensing Searches for Planets.

ASTRON 331 Astrophysics TEST 1 May 5, This is a closed-book test. No notes, books, or calculators allowed.

Towards the Galactic Distribution of Exoplanets

Keck Key Strategic Mission Support Program for WFIRST

Gravitational Lensing. A Brief History, Theory, and Applications

16th Microlensing Season of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment

REANALYSIS OF THE GRAVITATIONAL MICROLENSING EVENT MACHO-97-BLG-41 BASED ON COMBINED DATA

Simple Point Lens 3 Features. & 3 Parameters. t_0 Height of Peak. Time of Peak. u_0 Width of Peak. t_e

Binary Lenses in OGLE-III EWS Database. Season 2004

Gravitational microlensing. Exoplanets Microlensing and Transit methods

Microlensing with Spitzer

The Wellington microlensing modelling programme

Detecting Planets via Gravitational Microlensing

Rachel Street. K2/Campaign 9: Microlensing

MICROLENSING PLANET DISCOVERIES. Yossi Shvartzvald NPP Fellow at JPL

(x 2 + ξ 2 ) The integral in (21.02) is analytic, and works out to 2/ξ 2. So. v = 2GM ξc

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 1 Jun 1999

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 14 Nov 2006

BEYOND CAUSTIC CROSSINGS: PROPERTIES OF BINARY MICROLENSING LIGHT CURVES

Extrasolar Planets. Methods of detection Characterization Theoretical ideas Future prospects

Search for Earth Mass Planets and Dark Matter Too

BROAD SPECTRAL LINE AND CONTINUUM VARIABILITIES IN QSO SPECTRA INDUCED BY MICROLENSING:METHODS OF COMPUTATION

Microlensing Surveys for Exoplanets

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 4 Nov 1999

Microlensing by Multiple Planets in High Magnification Events

Refining Microlensing Models with KECK Adaptive Optics. Virginie Batista

The frequency of snowline planets from a 2 nd generation microlensing survey

Gravitational Microlensing

Planets & Life. Planets & Life PHYS 214. Please start all class related s with 214: 214: Dept of Physics (308A)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Microlensing Planets: A Controlled Scientific Experiment From Absolute Chaos Andy Gould (OSU)

Investigating the free-floating planet mass by Euclid observations

Is the Galactic Bulge Devoid of Planets?

Single Lens Lightcurve Modeling

Dark Matter. Homework 3 due. ASTR 433 Projects 4/17: distribute abstracts 4/19: 20 minute talks. 4/24: Homework 4 due 4/26: Exam ASTR 333/433.

MICROLENSING BY MULTIPLE PLANETS IN HIGH-MAGNIFICATION EVENTS B. Scott Gaudi. and Richard M. Naber and Penny D. Sackett

3/6/12! Astro 358/Spring 2012! Galaxies and the Universe! Dark Matter in Spiral Galaxies. Dark Matter in Galaxies!

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 18 Aug 2007

Detectability of Orbital Motion in Stellar Binary and Planetary Microlenses

Observational Cosmology

Scott Gaudi The Ohio State University Sagan Summer Workshop August 9, 2017

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 5 Apr 1996

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 22 Oct 2013

Copyright 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.

Microlensing and the Physics of Stellar Atmospheres

Light - electromagnetic radiation

Ch. 10: Star Formation of Planetary Systems. A summary of the process by which our solar system formed, according to the nebular theory.

A re-analysis of exomoon candidate MOA-2011-BLG-262lb using the Besançon Galactic Model

The Cult of Microlensing B. Scott Gaudi Institute for Advanced Study

Observations of extrasolar planets

The Galactic Exoplanet Survey Telescope (GEST)

Exploring the shortest microlensing events

Observations of gravitational microlensing events with OSIRIS. A Proposal for a Cruise Science Observation

Part 4: Gravitational Microlensing

Introduction to (Strong) Gravitational Lensing: Basics and History. Joachim Wambsganss Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg (ZAH/ARI)

Ultra high magnification microlensing

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 7 Sep 2018

The Demographics of Extrasolar Planets Beyond the Snow Line with Ground-based Microlensing Surveys

BASICS OF GRAVITATIONAL LENSING

Detectability of extrasolar moons as gravitational microlenses. C. Liebig and J. Wambsganss

Binary Lenses in OGLE-II Database. A Preliminary Study

Gravitational Microlensing Observations. Grant Christie

Planet abundance from PLANET observations

objects via gravitational microlensing

Planets are plentiful

{ 2 { light curves introduces a systematic bias in the estimate of event time scales and optical depth. Other eects of blending were considered by Nem

What Have We Found? 1978 planets in 1488 systems as of 11/15/15 ( ) 1642 planets candidates (

PHY323:Lecture 7 Dark Matter with Gravitational Lensing

Architecture and demographics of planetary systems

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 25 Jan 2010

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 30 May 2008

8.01. Determine arc length, angular velocity, and angular acceleration.

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 4 Feb 2013

OGLE-TR-56. Guillermo Torres, Maciej Konacki, Dimitar D. Sasselov and Saurabh Jha INTRODUCTION

Gravitational Potential Energy. The Gravitational Field. Grav. Potential Energy Work. Grav. Potential Energy Work

HD Transits HST/STIS First Transiting Exo-Planet. Exoplanet Discovery Methods. Paper Due Tue, Feb 23. (4) Transits. Transits.

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 2 Mar 2016

The Frequency of Snowline-region Planets & Free-Floating Planets From 2 nd generation microlensing and beyond

The Analyzer. We will deal mainly with magnetic sector instruments here although we will talk briefly about other separation methods later.

Light and Telescopes

Transcription:

Planet/Binary Degeneracy I High-magnification events with double-peak structure Not only planets but also very wide or very close binaries can also produce such a perturbations. Can we distinguish them without detailed modelling? Fig 1. Magnification pattern maps in the central perturbation region of a planetary (upper panels) and binary lensing events, respectively. Right panels are blow-ups of the left panels. Fig 2. Light curves resulting from the source trajectories in the maps of Fig. 1.

An example of a high-magnification events with double-peak structure MACHO 99-BLG-47 OGLE-2005-BLG-071 OGLE-2007-BLG-349/MOA-2007-BLG-379 OGLE-2007-BLG-514 OGLE-2007-BLG-137/MOA-2007-BLG-091 Fig 3. Light curve of the microlensing event OGLE-2005-BLG-071. It shows a double-peak structure near the peak.

Difference in the morphology A simple diagnostic that can be used to immediately distinguish between the perturbations caused by the planetary and binary companions. The diagnostic is based on the difference in the shape of the intra-peak region of the light curve. Binary lensing: The shape is smooth and concave. Planetary lensing: either boxy or convex The convex structure for planetary lensing is due to the small, weak cusp between the two strong cusps. Good coverage of the intra-peak region is very important. See the light curve of OGLE-2005-BLG-071 again. Fig 4. Variation of the planetary light curves with double peaks.

Planetary Feature under Severe Finite-Source Effect High-magnification events with severe finite-source effect Effect of finite-source effect on perturbation pattern As the angular extent of the source size becomes bigger, the effect becomes more important. As the effect increases, the planetary signal is attenuated. It is believed that the signal is completely washed out when the source size is substantially greater than the caustic size. Is this true? We find that perturbations with fractional magnification excess 5% survive when the source star is roughly 4 times bigger than the caustic. Fig 5. Variation of perturbation pattern depending on finite-source effect.

Fig 6. Light curve of the microlensing event MOA-2007-BLG-400

Characteristic Features: characteristic features that commonly appear in the perturbation patterns of planetary lens systems affected by severe finite-source effect Localized, arc-shaped perturbation regions around the circle with radius corresponding to the radius of the source star. These features form in and around a circle with its center located at the caustic center and a radius corresponding to that of the source star. The light curve of an event where the source crosses these features will exhibit a distinctive signal that is characterized by short-duration perturbations of either positive or negative excess and a flat residual region between these short-duration perturbations. Fig 8. Light curve and residual of an example planetary lensing event under severe finite-source effect. Fig 7. Morphology of central perturbation of a planetary lens system.

Signals of events under severe finite-finite can also be produced by a binary companion. How can we distinguish the planetary and binary interpretations? Comparison of the perturbation patterns Planet/Binary Degeneracy II Fig 9. Morphology of central perturbation induced by a planet. Fig 10. Morphology of central perturbation induced by a wide-separation binary companion.

The most prominent difference shows up in the morphology of the edge feature with negative excess. Binary lensing: The edge feature forms a complete circle. Planetary lensing: The edge feature appears as several arc segments. The difference is basically caused by the difference in caustic shape. Binary lensing: symmetric Planetary lensing: asymmetric and elongated Diagnostic The absence of a well-developed dip in the residual from the single-lensing light curve at both or either of the moments of the caustic center's entrance into and exit from the source star surface indicates that the perturbation is produced by a planetary companion. Fig 11. Residuals from single lensing for evenets produced by a planetary and a wide-separation binary systems.

Planet/Binary Degeneracy III A diagnostic applicable to caustic-crossing events Fig 13. Morphology of central perturbation induced by a planet. Fig 12. Morphology of central perturbation induced by a wide-separation binary.

Morphology of perturbation inside caustics Binary lensing: concentric circular pattern around the caustic center Planetary lensing: elongated and off-centered Diagnostic Distinctive features of the individual lens populations in the residual of the trough region between the two peaks of the caustic crossings. Binary lensing: symmetric residual Planetary lensing: asymmetric in general Applicability The proposed diagnostic is useful for massive planets, which would be most common. Fig 14. Ranges in the parameter space where the proposed diagnostics can be applicable.

Close/Wide Degeneracy (s s -1 degeneracy) Perturbations induced by a planet with a projected separation in units of the Einstein radius, s, is very similar to the perturbation induced by a planet with a separation 1/s. In what cases can this degeneracy resolved? Fig 16. Color-scale maps of magnification excess for planets with separation from the star greater than the Einstein radius (s>1). Brown is positive excess and blue is negative excess. Color-scale becomes darker at the excess levels of 1%, 2%, 4%, 8%, 16%, and 32%. Fig 15. Color-scale maps of magnification excess for planets with separation from the star less than the Einstein radius (s<1).

Tendencies Although similar, the patterns of perturbations induced by a close and wide a planets are not identical. The magnification difference becomes larger as the planet/primary mass ratio increases and primary-planet separation approaches the Einstein radius. For a given pair of a close and a wide planets, the region of major difference is confined in the region around the line connecting the central and the planetary caustics. Fig 17. Color-scale maps of the difference in the magnification excess between close and wide planetary systems.

Cause of the difference The difference between the perturbation patterns of close and wide planets are due to the effect of the planetary caustic. Central perturbation is not isolated and instead it is connected to the region of perturbation induced by the planetary caustic. As the planet/primary mass ratio increases and the planet-primary separation approaches the Einstein radius, the planetary caustic becomes bigger abd its effect on the central perturbation region increases. This matches the tendency of the difference between the central perturbations induced by the close and a wide planets. Fig 18. Maps of magnification excess (upper two panels) and excess difference (bottom panel) for an example pair of a close and a wide planet.