NA62: Ultra-Rare Kaon Decays

Similar documents
PoS(KAON)059. Giuseppe Ruggiero. Scuola Normale Superiore and INFN, Pisa, Italy

Search for K + π + νν decay at NA62 experiment. Viacheslav Duk, University of Birmingham for the NA62 collaboration

Kaon Identification at NA62. Institute of Physics Particle, Astroparticle, and Nuclear Physics groups Conference 2015

New Limits on Heavy Neutrino from NA62

PoS(KAON)049. Testing the µ e universality with K ± l ± ν decays

Κ+ p+νν : first NA62 results

Non-collision Background Monitoring Using the Semi-Conductor Tracker of ATLAS at LHC

PoS(KAON13)012. R K Measurement with NA62 at CERN SPS. Giuseppe Ruggiero. CERN

2017 NA62 Status Report to the CERN SPSC

Jacopo Pinzino CERN HQL /05/2018

New Limits on Heavy Neutrino from NA62

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

π 0 Dalitz Transition Form Factor and other news from NA62 Nicolas Lurkin University of Birmingham, 26/04/2017

High-energy Gamma Rays detection with the AMS-02 electromagnetic calorimeter. F. Pilo for the AMS-02 ECAL Group INFN Sezione di Pisa, Italy

The NA62 Experiment. Seminar at LPNHE, Paris, France. Mathieu PERRIN-TERRIN. February 4, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.

Measurement of the η mass by the NA48 Experiment

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

Particle Identification of the LHCb detector

R. Fantechi CERN and INFN Sezione di Pisa on behalf of the NA62 Collaboration

Measurement of the baryon number transport with LHCb

Observation of the rare B 0 s µ + µ decay

Future prospects for the measurement of direct photons at the LHC

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 19 Jun 2004

New Hadroproduction results from the HARP/PS214 experiment at CERN PS

Search for heavy neutrinos in kaon decays

Benjamin Carron Mai 3rd, 2004

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters

V0 cross-section measurement at LHCb. RIVET analysis module for Z boson decay to di-electron

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

PoS(KAON09)023. Beam Hole Photon Veto For J-PARC K O TO experiment. Yosuke Maeda Kyoto University

DESY Summer Students Program 2008: Exclusive π + Production in Deep Inelastic Scattering

Nicolas Berger SLAC, Menlo Park, California, U.S.A.

Particle Identification Algorithms for the Medium Energy ( GeV) MINERνA Test Beam Experiment

Identification of Central Production in the π + π π + π Channel at COMPASS

Physics potential of ATLAS upgrades at HL-LHC

The SHiP experiment. Colloquia: IFAE A. Paoloni( ) on behalf of the SHiP Collaboration. 1. Introduction

Information about the T9 beam line and experimental facilities

LHCb: From the detector to the first physics results

Luminosity measurement and K-short production with first LHCb data. Sophie Redford University of Oxford for the LHCb collaboration

An Overview of RICH Detectors From PID to Velocity Spectrometers

Testing the m-e universality with ±

CMS Conference Report

Status of the LHCb Experiment. Ueli Strauman, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Sept. 13, 2001

b Physics Prospects For The LHCb Experiment Thomas Ruf for the LHCb Collaboration Introduction Detector Status Physics Program

Application of the Tau Identification Capability of CMS in the Detection of Associated Production of MSSM Heavy Neutral Higgs Bosons Souvik Das

Particle Production Measurements at Fermilab

A beam line for schools

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Hyperon physics in NA48

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)522. The status of MICE Step IV

Emittance Measurement in the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment

Overview and Status of Measurements of F 3π at COMPASS

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

First Run-2 results from ALICE

Fermilab FERMILAB-Conf-00/344-E CKM January 2001

The future NA48 programs at CERN. Patrizia Cenci. Yalta - Crimea, September 2001 New trends in high energy physics

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS LIQUID ARGON FORWARD CALORIMETER IN BEAM TESTS

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Sep 2009

Measurement of the Inclusive Isolated Prompt Photon Cross Section at CDF

New limits on Heavy Neutral Lepton from Kaon CERN

Particle Identification: Computer reconstruction of a UA1 event with an identified electron as a candidate for a W >eν event

2 ATLAS operations and data taking

HARP (Hadron Production) Experiment at CERN

Reconstruction of. events in LHCb. Benjamin Carron

Likelihood Methods for Beam Particle Identification at the COMPASS Experiment

Results from HARP. Malcolm Ellis On behalf of the HARP collaboration DPF Meeting Riverside, August 2004

PRELIMINARY RESULT ON DIRECT CP VIOLATION FROM NA DATA. DAPNIA-SPP / CEA-Saclay, Gif/Yvette cedex, France. Abstract

NA64. Dipanwita Banerjee ETH, Zurich On behalf of the NA64 collaboration

Status of the LHCb RICH and hadron particle identification

Relative branching ratio measurements of charmless B ± decays to three hadrons

1 Introduction. KOPIO charged-particle vetos. K - RARE Meeting (Frascati) May Purpose of CPV: veto Kl

Polarized muon decay asymmetry measurement: status and challenges

PoS(ICHEP2016)293. The LArIAT experiment and the charged pion total interaction cross section results on liquid argon. Animesh Chatterjee

LHCb: Reoptimized Detector & Tracking Performance

Recent results at the -meson region from the CMD-3 detector at the VEPP-2000 collider

Tracking at the LHC. Pippa Wells, CERN

Particle Detectors A brief introduction with emphasis on high energy physics applications

A Measurement Of WZ/ZZ ll+jj Cross Section. Rahmi Unalan Michigan State University Thesis Defense

PAMELA satellite: fragmentation in the instrument

The First Results of K2K long-baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 1 Oct 2015

Performance of muon and tau identification at ATLAS

RICH detectors for LHCb

THE CERN NA62 experiment [1] aims to measure the

Lepton and Charm Measurements in the First Two Years of RHIC: An Experimental Overview

NA62 & Kaon Experiments

CsI Calorimeter for KOTO experiment

PoS(DIS 2010)058. ATLAS Forward Detectors. Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington

A Summary of Ξ ο Physics at KTEV. Erik J. Ramberg Fermilab 2 December, 2005

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)572. Search for the dark photon in the π 0 decay. R. Fantechi INFN - Sezione di Pisa and CERN

David Gascón. Daniel Peralta. Universitat de Barcelona, ECM department. E Diagonal 647 (Barcelona) IFAE, Universitat Aut onoma de Barcelona

Variation in MC prediction of MB nu flux

Experimental Search for the Decay

The ALICE Experiment Introduction to relativistic heavy ion collisions

Track measurement in the high multiplicity environment at the CBM Experiment

Hadronic vs e + e - colliders

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

Thin Calorimetry for Cosmic-Ray Studies Outside the Earth s Atmosphere. 1 Introduction

Transcription:

NA62: Ultra-Rare Kaon Decays Phil Rubin George Mason University For the NA62 Collaboration November 10, 2011 The primary goal of the experiment is to reconstruct more than 100 K + π + ν ν events, over two (machine) years of running, keeping systematic uncertainties at a level well below that of statistical uncertainties, so that the total uncertainty is of order 10%, about the level of theoretical uncertainties. Given a signal branching ratio of about 8.5 10 11, and about a 10% detector acceptance, the detector needs to see roughly 10 13 K + decays. In order to keep background contamination below 10%, suppression must be at the 10 12 level, within an uncertainty of less than 10%, so as not to inflate systematic uncertainties with the background subtraction. Statistical sensitivity then requires a very high intensity kaon beam and optimized signal sensitivity. Systematic sensitivity will result from maximizing signal purity to reduce accidentals and minimizing material in the spectrometer to reduce multiple scattering. In addition, detector redundancies will permit internal cross-checking. The signal, K + π + ν ν, has a branching fraction of O(10 10 ). The primary backgrounds to this signal, K + µ + ν µ and K + π + π 0, have branching fractions of O(1), higher by ten orders of magnitude. These are two-body decays, while the signal is a three body decay, so kinematics, given outstanding resolution, can help distinguish them from signal. Unfortunately, even the best of systems suffers from non-gaussian reconstruction tails. To make matters worse, the final states of these background are similar to that of the signal. The π + is all that is detectable from the signal channel, as is the muon of the µ + ν µ background. Excellent particle identification can distinguish these even where kinematics might prove inadequate. The π + π 0 final state has the same charged particle as the signal, but the π 0 decays rapidly into two photons, two electrons and a photon, or four electrons. Should these secondary particles go undetected, and the kinematic measurements fall in the tails, the event may be mis-identified as signal. The detector thus needs to be hermetic. Several multi-body K + decay channels, most not subject to kinematic differentiation from the signal channel, with branching fractions from O(10 4 ) to O(10 2 ), are also backgrounds, which, to be rejected, must be detected and identified. These include radiative two-body decays as well as K + π + π + π, K + π + π 0 π 0, and the semi-leptonic modes K e3 and K µ3. The experiment will be run in the north area extraction line of CERN s SPS ring. It will use a relatively high-momentum K + beam (75.00 ± 0.75 GeV/c), which can be delivered at high intensity, optimized for kaon flux relative to that of charged pions and protons ( 750 MHz hadron beam, 6% K +, from 1.1 10 12 protons/s during a spill). The decay-in-flight fixed-target technique will be employed, permitting the use of an extended detector array with redundant momentum and particle identification determinations. The signature of the signal is a single, off-beam-axis, charged pion and nothing else. Backgrounds include not only essentially all other K + decays, many listed above, but also accidental charged particles from secondary beam particle interactions and their decays. To manage this difficult experimental environment, 1

the NA62 detector [see Figure 1] has been designed for kinematic rejection, tight timing, hermetic vetoing, and redundant particle identification. Figure 1: The NA62 Detector. The NA62 detector will be in the beam line and experimental hall of the former NA48 experiment, whose liquid krypton electromagnetic calorimeter will be refitted with new power supplies and readout electronics and reused. A beamline differential Cerenkov detector, CEDAR, will be renovated with new optics and filled with hydrogen for charged-kaon identification. The NA48 hadron calorimeter will be refurbished for use as a muon detector, behind which a new scintillator array will serve as a fast muon veto. The NA48 charged-trigger hodoscope will either be renovated or replaced. Six additional new subdetector groups are being built: GIGATRACKER (GTK), CHANTI (charged particle veto), Large Angle Veto, Straw Tracker, RICH, and Small Angle and Beamline calorimeters. Because characterizing the incoming kaon beam is essential for selecting events of interest and reducing backgrounds, the GTK is a pivotal component. It will provide precision measurements of this beam s momentum (relative uncertainty of 0.2%), time ( 150 ps [rms]), and angle ( 16 µrad). See Figure 2 for test beam results with GTK proto-types. It is composed of three hybrid silicon pixel detector stations mounted around four achromatic magnets, and is in the beam line inside a vacuum tank, just before the primary elements of the NA62 detector. Pixel dimensions and station separations are optimized to deliver the required momentum and angular resolution. Angular resolution is also affected by the amount of material crossed by the beam at each station. A sensor thickness of 200 µm, corresponding to 0.22% of a radiation length, X 0, was chosen. A similar thickness was allocated to the read-out and cooling systems, so the total amount of material per station has been engineered not to exceed 0.5%X 0. Finally, the GTK must accommodate a high and non-uniform beam rate (0.75 MHz total, 1.3 MHz/mm 2 near the center) and survive a high radiation environment. No existing design meets all these requirements, and the resulting product, available for other applications, such as medicine, is a novel combined effort of numerous academic, research, and commercial institutions. Charged particle tracking downstream of the decay volume will be done with Straw Trackers, which will be stationed in vacuum. With no beam windows or surrounding gas, the material budget is extremely small: 0.1% X 0 per layer. Each straw can maintain a 0.5 MHz rate with high efficiency. Four straw stations, 2

Figure 2: Time resolution for a GTK proto-type module in a test beam. each with views in four coordinates (x, y, u, v), are positioned two each side of a spectrometer magnet. Each view has a position resolution of about 130 µm. The angular resolution is expected to be 10 µrad for 10-GeV pions and 20 µrad for 60-GeV pions. The relative momentum resolution should be about 0.33%, and the extrapolated vertex resolution (closest distance of approach) should be about 1 mm. The stringing of the first straw module is complete [See Figure 3]. Figure 3: The first of sixteen straw modules has been strung. Kinematic rejection allows differentiation of the signal from about 92% of the total K + width. The discriminating kinematic variable is missing mass squared: m2miss = (PK Pπ )2 3 (1)

In terms of this variable, two signal regions can be identified, between the K + µ + ν µ and K + π + π + π spectra, and separated by the K + π + π 0 peak [see Figure 4]. The first region spans from about 0 to 0.01 (GeV/c 2 ) 2, and the second region spans from about 0.025 (GeV/c 2 ) 2 to about 0.068 (GeV/c 2 ) 2. The Figure 4: Kinematically constrained background. remaining 8% or so of the width is not so constrained [see Figure 5]. Figure 5: Kinematically unconstrained background. The efficiency of this kinematic selection obviously depends both on the missing mass squared resolution and on the association of the parent K + with its daughter π +. The missing mass squared resolution has been estimated to be roughly 0.001 (GeV/c 2 ) 2 with a realistic GEANT 4 Monte Carlo simulation of the new tracking system [see Figure 6]. This allows a 14.4% geometrical acceptance (3.5% from the first region and 10.9% from the second), with two-body rejection power of 10 4 for K + π + π 0 and 10 5 for K + µ + ν µ. About half the losses are due to restrictions on the pion momentum, due to the RICH detector operating efficiency and muon and photon rejection. The signal acceptance will of course be somewhat lower than 14.4% due to losses from such experimental exigencies as dead time and channel inefficiencies. Additional 4

Figure 6: Missing mass squared resolution as a function of pion momentum. signal efficiency loss will result from non-gaussian tails in the missing mass squared distribution and from K π mismatching. To minimize the latter effect, which arises from the high-rate environment of the experiment, a differential Cerenkov counter will be employed to identify kaons, distinguishing them from pions and protons which might interact with the GTK or decay volume residual gas. The CEDAR detector will see a 50 MHz rate, while the GTK will experience an 800 MHz rate. Kaons will decay in the fiducial region at a rate of about 4.5 MHz, but the rate in the reconstruction detectors will be in the 7-10 MHz range, enhanced by a muon halo from upstream particle interactions and pion decay-in-flight. The demands on parent-daughter matching are compounded by the finite width and divergence of the charged particle beam. Design parameters call for σ(t) 100 ps for both K + and π + tracks. The NA62 detector will include both photon and muon veto capabilities. Photon vetoing will enhance the detector s K + π + π 0 rejection power by identifying π 0 s. With the charged pion momentum requirement p π + < 35 GeV/c, p π 0 > 40 GeV/c, and the daughter photons of the latter will will consequently have energies in excess of 1 GeV. For 10 GeV photons, the liquid krypton calorimeter (LKr) (coverage from 1-8.5 mrad) has an inefficiency of 10 5. Including large- (8.5-50 mrad) and small-angle photon veto detectors (< 1 mrad) will increase the rejection factor for π 0 s from K + π + π 0 to about 10 8. Six of twelve large-angle photon veto detectors have already been constructed at Frascati and delivered to CERN. Muon vetoing will enhance the rejection power beyond kinematics of K + µ + ν µ. A combination of detectors, including the liquid krypton calorimeter and the muon detector system, which can also serve as a hadron calorimeter, can separate minimum ionizing particles from electromagnetic and hadronic showers. The rejection factor for muons from K + µ + ν µ is expected to be around 10 5. All this, however, remains inadequate to suppress sufficiently the K + µ + ν µ background, and even less so that from K + µ + ν µ γ, which is unconstrained kinematically. Particle identification, with the liquid krypton calorimeter and RICH detector, can add another factor of 10 2 to the rejection power, by distinguishing between pions and muons in the momentum range between 15 GeV/c and 35 GeV/c. The RICH detector is expected to have excellent timing (σ t 100 ps, offline), and as such, may be used in the lowest-level, hardware trigger. Primitive reconstruction algorithms, perhaps carried out with the aid of Graphical Processing Units, may allow for pion identification in the first software trigger. 5

Excellent timing and position resolution and particle identification within a hermetic detector can, with a high-flux kaon beam, lead to the background suppression and signal efficiency required to make a measurement of the K + π + ν ν branching ratio of sensitivity that begins to challenge theoretical predictions. Table 1 summarizes the components of this sensitivity. Table 1: Sensitivity and backgrounds. Decay Channel Events Signal: K + π + ν ν [flux = 4.8 10 12 decays/year] 55 events/year K + π + π 0 [η π 0 = 2 10 8 (3.5 10 8 )] 4.3% (7.5%) K + µ + ν µ 2.2% K + e + π + π ν e 3% Other 3 charged-track events 1.5% K + π + π 0 γ 2% K + µ + ν µ γ 0.7% K + e + (µ + )π 0 ν, others negligible Expected Background/Signal Fraction 13.5% (17%) A test run of the experiment, with a subset of the final detector will take place in Autumn 2012. The primary focus of the run is the hardware trigger system, particulary its integration with detector subsystems and its protential for reducing raw rates by a factor of ten. Given CERN s current accelerator operation plan, first physics for NA62 is expected in 2014. 6