BPS States in N=4. Ashoke Sen. Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India

Similar documents
wall crossing redux PILJIN YI STRINGS 2013 KOREA INSTITUTE for ADVANCED STUDY

Witten Index for Noncompact Dynamics

Affine SU(N) algebra from wall-crossings

Framed BPS States In Two And Four Dimensions. Gregory Moore. String Math, Paris, June 27, 2016

Framed BPS States In Four And Two Dimensions. Gregory Moore. String Math, Paris, June 27, 2016

5d SCFTs and instanton partition functions

Extremal Black Hole Entropy

Spectral Networks and Their Applications. Caltech, March, 2012

Two Examples of Seiberg Duality in Gauge Theories With Less Than Four Supercharges. Adi Armoni Swansea University

Web Formalism and the IR limit of massive 2D N=(2,2) QFT. collaboration with Davide Gaiotto & Edward Witten

2d-4d wall-crossing and hyperholomorphic bundles

Refined BPS Indices, Intrinsic Higgs States and Quiver Invariants

Topological reduction of supersymmetric gauge theories and S-duality

Monopolia. Gregory Moore Nambu Memorial Symposium University of Chicago. March 13, 2016

Semiclassical Framed BPS States

Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee

Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, Matrix Models and Geometric Transitions

Half BPS solutions in type IIB and M-theory

Surface Defects and the BPS Spectrum of 4d N=2 Theories

Current Algebra Constraints on Supersymmetric Quantum Field Theories

Free fermion and wall-crossing

Spectral networks at marginal stability, BPS quivers, and a new construction of wall-crossing invariants

Techniques for exact calculations in 4D SUSY gauge theories

BPS states, Wall-crossing and Quivers

Partition functions of N = 4 Yang-Mills and applications

Recent Advances in SUSY

SUPERCONFORMAL FIELD THEORIES. John H. Schwarz. Abdus Salam ICTP 10 November 2010

Algebraic structure of the IR limit of massive d=2 N=(2,2) theories. collaboration with Davide Gaiotto & Edward Witten

Wall-crossing from quantum multi-centered BPS black holes

Magnetic Monopoles and N = 2 super Yang Mills

Wall-crossing, Black holes, and Quivers

Rigid Holography and 6d N=(2,0) Theories on AdS 5 xs 1

Generalized Global Symmetries

Wall Crossing and Quivers

Ω-deformation and quantization

Witten, Cardy, and Holonomy Saddles

Dualities and 5-Brane Webs for 5d rank 2 SCFTs

Non-Supersymmetric Seiberg duality Beyond the Planar Limit

S-CONFINING DUALITIES

Some Tools for Exploring Supersymmetric RG Flows

New Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories and M2-branes

Knot Homology from Refined Chern-Simons Theory

Possible Advanced Topics Course

A Landscape of Field Theories

Four Lectures on Web Formalism and Categorical Wall-Crossing. collaboration with Davide Gaiotto & Edward Witten

Dynamics of Multiple Kaluza-Klein Monopoles in M- and String Theory

Nonperturbative Study of Supersymmetric Gauge Field Theories

Generalized Kac-Moody Algebras from CHL Dyons

The Langlands dual group and Electric-Magnetic Duality

Wall Crossing from Boltzmann Black Hole Halos

Chern-Simons Theories and AdS/CFT

Think Globally, Act Locally

Lecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theory

Hilbert Series and Its Applications to SUSY Gauge Theories

Supersymmetric Gauge Theories in 3d

A supermatrix model for ABJM theory

Black Hole Microstate Counting using Pure D-brane Systems

New and old N = 8 superconformal field theories in three dimensions

8.821 F2008 Lecture 5: SUSY Self-Defense

Geometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010

Magnetic bions, multiple adjoints, and Seiberg-Witten theory

4d N=2 as 6d N=(2,0) compactified on C

Lecture 12 Holomorphy: Gauge Theory

A New Regulariation of N = 4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

Topological String Theory

Exact Results in D=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories And Applications

Exact Half-BPS Solutions in Type IIB and M-theory

Instanton effective action in - background and D3/D(-1)-brane system in R-R background

Symmetries Then and Now

N = 2 CHERN-SIMONS MATTER THEORIES: RG FLOWS AND IR BEHAVIOR. Silvia Penati. Perugia, 25/6/2010

Little strings and T-duality

On Flux Quantization in F-Theory

THE MASTER SPACE OF N=1 GAUGE THEORIES

Instantons and Donaldson invariants

What is F-theory? David R. Morrison. University of California, Santa Barbara

Lecture 24 Seiberg Witten Theory III

Deconstructing the BPS sector of (2,0) Theories

BPS states, permutations and information

Rigid SUSY in Curved Superspace

Everything You Wanted To Know About k-strings But You Were Afraid To Ask. Adi Armoni Swansea University

Singularity structure and massless dyons of pure N = 2, d = 4 theories with A r and C r

NUMBER THEORY IN STRING THEORY: SKEW, MOCK, FALSE, AND QUANTUM

Perturbative Integrability of large Matrix Theories

A wall-crossing formula for 2d-4d DT invariants

Boundaries, Interfaces, & Duality in 3d SCFTs

A Localization Computation in Confining Phase

Holographic Anyons in the ABJM theory

Coordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates

't Hooft anomalies, 2-charge Schwinger model, and domain walls in hot super Yang-Mills theory

Orientiholes Γ 2 Γ 1. Frederik Denef, Mboyo Esole and Megha Padi, arxiv:

BPS non-local operators in AdS/CFT correspondence. Satoshi Yamaguchi (Seoul National University) E. Koh, SY, arxiv: to appear in JHEP

6d Superconformal Field Theories

Fixing all moduli in F-theory and type II strings

N=1 Global Supersymmetry in D=4

Partial deconfinement phases in gauged multi-matrix quantum mechanics.

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 30 Oct 2017

SUPERSTRING REALIZATIONS OF SUPERGRAVITY IN TEN AND LOWER DIMENSIONS. John H. Schwarz. Dedicated to the memory of Joël Scherk

6d SCFTs and Tao diagrams

Exact Quantization of a Superparticle in

arxiv: v3 [hep-th] 19 Aug 2014

Transcription:

BPS States in N=4 Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India Caltech, March 2012

Goal: Study the spectrum of BPS states in N=4 supersymmetric SU(n) Yang-Mills theories on the Coulomb branch where the gauge group is broken to U(1) n 1. 1. What are the possible questions whose answers are protected from changes under continuous deformation of the moduli and coupling constants? 2. What are the answers to these questions? Review + arxiv:1203.4889 We shall not follow the historical path but review the results from modern perspective.

The role of index We would like to compute properties of BPS states which are protected from changes under continuous deformation of moduli and coupling constants. need appropriate supersymmetric index. The appropriate index in D=4 is the helicity trace index. Bachas, Kiritsis

Suppose we have a BPS state that breaks 4n supersymmetries. there will be 4n fermion zero modes (goldstino) on the world-line of the state. Consider a pair of fermion zero modes ψ 0, ψ 0 carrying J 3 = ±1/2 and satisfying {ψ 0, ψ 0 } = 1 If 0 is the state annihilated by ψ 0 then 0, ψ 0 0 give a degenerate pair of states with J 3 = ±1/4 and hence ( 1) F = ( 1) 2J 3 = ( 1) ±1/2 = ±i Thus Tr( 1) F = 0, Tr( 1) F (2J 3 ) = i

Lesson: Quantization of the fermion zero modes produces Bose-Fermi degenerate states and makes Tr( 1) F vanish. Remedy: Define B 2n = ( 1)n (2n)! Tr( 1)F (2J 3 ) 2n = ( 1)n (2n)! Tr( 1)2J 3 (2J 3 ) 2n Since there are 2n pairs of zero modes, B 2n = ( 1)n (2n)! Tr resttr zero ( 1) 2J (1) ( 2J (1) 3 + 2J (2n) 3 + 2J rest 3 3 + 2J(2n) 3 +2J rest 3 ) 2n = ( 1) n Tr rest Tr zero ( 1) 2J(1) 3 + 2J(2n) 3 +2J rest 3 2J (1) 3 2J (2n) 3 = ( 1) n (i) 2n Tr rest ( 1) 2Jrest 3

B 2n = Tr rest ( 1) 2Jrest 3 Thus B 2n effectively counts Tr rest ( 1) F, with the trace taken over modes other than the 4n fermion zero modes associated with broken supersymmetry. Note: B 2n does not receive any contribution from non-bps states which break more than 4n supersymmetries and hence have more than 4n fermion zero modes. Due to this property B 2n is protected from quantum corrections.

Examples N=4 SYM in D=4 has 16 supersymmetries. 1/2 BPS states break 8 supersymmetries. the relevant index is B 4. 1/4 BPS states break 12 supersymmetries. Thus the relevant index is B 6.

Twisted index Suppose the theory has a global symmetry g that commutes with some of the unbroken supersymmetries of the BPS state. Suppose further that there are 4n broken g-invariant supersymmetries. In that case B g 2n = ( 1)n (2n)! Tr [ ( 1) 2h (2h) 2n g ] is a protected index that carries information about g quanum number. Note: Such global symmetries may appear in subspaces of the full moduli space in which case B g 2n can be defined only in that subspace.

We shall mostly focus on SU(n) SYM theories can be geometrically realized on the world-volume of n D3-branes. Leaving out the 3+1 world-volume directions each D3-brane can be located at any point in the 6 transverse directions. 6n dimensional moduli space. Of these 6 are associated with the center of mass U(1) SYM and are irrelevant for our problem. Complex coupling constant: τ = θ 2π + i 4π g 2 YM

In this description, BPS states are conveniently represented as string networks ending on D3-branes. 1 (p 1, q 1 ) 2 (p 2, q 2 ) Bergman; Bergman, Kol 5 3 (p 5, q 5 ) (p 3, q 3 ) (p 4, q 4 ) 4 (1,0): D-string, (0,1): fundamental string If gcd(p,q) = r then (p,q) r copies of (p/r, q/r).

1 (p 1, q 1 ) 2 (p 2, q 2 ) 5 (p 5, q 5 ) 3 (p 3, q 3 ) (p 4, q 4 ) 4 carries charges Q = (q 1, q 5 ), P = (p 1, p 5 ). Note: i q i = 0 = i p i no U(1) charge

Rules for string network 1. The network must be planar. 2. A (p,q) string should lie along e iα (p τ + q) (class A) or e iα (pτ + q) (class B). α: a constant for a given network. Schwarz; Aharony, Hanany, Kol; Dasgupta, Mukhi; A.S.

Half BPS states correspond to single (p, q) strings stretched between two D3-branes. 5 1 (p, q) 4 2 3 Q = (q, q, 0, 0, 0), P = (p, p, 0, 0, 0) Note: Q and P are always parallel. For these states B 4 = 1 if gcd(q,p)=1 and 0 otherwise. follows from S-duality invariance and known spectrum of (0,q) states. Olive, Witten; Osborn; A.S.; Segal, Selby

Quarter BPS states The relevant index is B 6. A configuration with strings ending on four or more D-branes is non-planar at a generic point in the moduli space and hence non-supersymmetric. 5 1 4 2 3 has B 6 = 0.

Thus B 6 receives contribution only from 3-string junctions. 1 2 Bergman 5 3 4 We would like to compute B 6 for an arbitrary 3-string junction.

Although the string junction picture is useful in determining the region of existence of 1/4 BPS states, it is not very useful in finding the index B 6. This can be done in special cases by representing them as bound states of multiple monopoles in gauge theories and solving the associated supersymmetric quantum mechanics problem. Bak, Lee, Yi; Gauntlett, Kim, Park, Yi; Stern, Yi (1,k) (0,s) ( 1, k s) For this configuration B 6 = ( 1) s+1 s

A three string junction exists in a certain region of the moduli space bounded by walls of margial stability. Along each wall the 3-string junction becomes marginally unstable against decay into a pair of half BPS states. Beyond these walls the state stop existing. This suggests that we can try to derive the index using wall crossing formula.

Across a wall along which (Q,P) decays into a pair of half BPS states with primitive charges (Q 1, P 1 ) and (Q 2, P 2 ) the jump in the index B 6 is ( 1) Q 1.P 2 P 1.Q 2 +1 Q 1.P 2 Q 2.P 1 B 4 (Q 1, P 1 )B 4 (Q 2, P 2 ) Denef; Denef, Moore; A.S.; Dabholkar, Gaiotto, Nampuri; Cheng, Verinde

(1,k) ( 1, k s) (0,s) Consider the wall along which the (0,s) s(0,1) string shrinks to zero-size. decays to (1,k) string connecting a pair of D3-branes and a ( 1, k s) string connecting a pair of D3-branes, each with B 4 = 1. The jump in B 6 across this wall is given by( 1) s+1 s in agreement with direct index computation. Dabholkar, Nampuri, Narayan

Can we calculate the B 6 of a general 3-string junction? (p 1, q 1 ) (p 2, q 2 ) (p 3, q 3 ) In general the decays are not primitive, e.g. for (2,0) ( 5, 15) (3,15) none of the decays are primitive.

We need to use general wall crossing formula for non-primitive decays in N=4 supersymmetric string / field theories. Relevant decays are to pair of half BPS states: (Q, P) (Q 1, P 1 ) + (Q 2, P 2 ) B 6 = ( 1) Q 1 P 2 Q 2 P 1 +1 Q 1 P 2 Q 2 P 1 B 4 (Q 1 /r 1, P 1 /r 1 ) B 4 (Q 2 /r 2, P 2 /r 2 ) r 1 Q 1,P 1 r 2 Q 2,P 2 Banerjee, Srivastava, A.S; A.S. For SYM theories, B 4 (Q/r, P/r) = 1 r Q,P simple formula for B 6.

For (p 1, q 1 ) (p 2, q 2 ) (p 3, q 3 ) B 6 = ( 1) p 1q 2 p 2 q 1 +1 p 1 q 2 p 2 q 1 symmetric in the three strings. This solves completely the problem of computing B 6 for N=4 supersymmetric SU(n) theories. This also agrees with the limits of the formula for B 6 in heteroric string theory on T 6. Banerjee, Srivastava, A.S.

For other gauge groups we can compute B 6 by identifying various SU(3) subgroups and computing B 6 for different chage vectors in each SU(3).

We shall now return to more general planar string network (possibly with internal loops). 1 (p 1, q 1 ) 2 (p 2, q 2 ) 5 (p 5, q 5 ) 3 (p 3, q 3 ) (p 4, q 4 ) 4 As argued before, B 6 and any other index that is defined everywhere in the moduli space vanish for this configuration.

Strategy Introduce an index that can be defined only in spacial subspace of the moduli space where all the D3-branes lie in a plane. only two of the six adjoint Higgs fields take vev. Make use of the SO(4) SU(2) L SU(2) R rotational symmetry in the four directions transverse to the plane of the 3-branes to introduce a twisted index.

SU(2) L SU(2) R SU(2) rotation transformation laws of various supersymmetries: State unbroken susy broken susy Half BPS (1,2,2) + (2,1,2) (1,2,2) + (2,1,2) Class A quarter BPS (1,2,2) (1,2,2) + 2 (2,1,2) Class B quarter BPS (2,1,2) 2(1,2,2) + (2,1,2) Class A states and half BPS states have four broken and four unbroken SU(2) L invariant SUSY Of these two of each are invariant unde I 3R + J 3 (I 3L, I 3R, J 3 ): Cartan gen. of SU(2) L SU(2) R SU(2) rotation

Following earlier logic we can now introduce protected index B 2 (z) = 1 2! Tr{( 1)2J 3 z 2I 3L (2J 3 ) 2 } B 1 (y, z) = 1 y y 1 Tr { e 2iπJ 3 z 2I 3L y 2I 3R+2J 3 (2J 3 ) } Similar index for N=2 SUSY theories are known. One can show that for class A states B 2 (z) = lim y 1 B 1 (y, z) B 6 = lim z 1 (z + z 1 2) 2 B 2 (z) Thus B 1 (y, z) is the most general index. Gaiotto, Moore, Neitzke

Can we compute B 1 (y, z) for a general string network? 1. For half BPS states we have all the information and B 1 (y, z) is straightforward to compute. B 1 (y, z) = (z + z 1 y y 1 )(y y 1 ) for each primitive half BPS state. 2. For collinear configuration of D3-branes only half BPS states contribute to B 1 (y, z). Strategy: Start from this collinear configuration and apply wall crossing formula to find the result elsewhere in the moduli space. Caution: The structure of marginal stability walls is more complicated than before.

B 1 (y, z) follows a wall crossing formula similar to the motivic KS formula. Kontsevich, Soibelman There are many physical derivations of this formula by now. Cecotti, Vafa; Gaiotto, Moore, Neitzke; Dimofte, Gukov; Andriyash, Denef, Jafferis, Moore; Lee, Yi; Kim, Park, Wang, Yi; Manschot, Pioline, A.S We can try to derive the wall crossing formula for B 1 (y, z) using any of these approaches. We use the last approach.

1. Given α = (Q, P) and α = (Q, P ), define 2. Define B 1 (α; y, z) m α α, α = Q.P Q.P m 1 3. Introduce the algebra: y y 1 y m y B 1(α/m; y m, z m ) m [e α, e α ] = ( y) α,α ( y) α,α e y y 1 α+α Then wall crossing formula tells us that: ( P exp [ B1 ] ) (α; y, z)e α is unchanged across a wall. α P: ordering according to Arg(central charge).

Using the wall crossing formula and the result for half BPS states we can compute B 1 (y, z) for any class A quarter BPS states in any chamber in the moduli space. The corresponding index for class B states can be computed in a similar way.

Example 1: Consider the network (0, s 1 ) (0, s 2 ) ( 1, k) (1, m) Stern, Yi (0, s n ) We can shrink the (0, s i ) strings one by one and apply the primitive wall crossing formula. Final result for B 1 (y, z): ( 1) { s i +n z + z 1 y y 1} n+1 y si y s i y y 1 i We get the same result by shrinking the ( 1, k) string and applying semi-primitive wall crossing formula.

B 1 (y, z) = ( 1) s i +n { z + z 1 y y 1} n+1 i y s i y s i y y 1 Consistency check: 1. For y = 1, z = 1 we get 4 i ( 1)s i (4si ) agrees with an appropriate index computed in supersymmetric quantum mechanics of multiple monopoles. Stern, Yi This has also been derived by applying primitive wall crossing formula. Dabholkar, Nampuri, Narayan 2. y-dependence agrees with quiver quantum mechanics analysis. Denef

Example 2: 1 1 ( 3, 2) ( 3, 2) ( 2, 1) (1,1) (0,-1) (2,0) (1,2) (2,0) (1,2) 2 3 2 3 We can try to compute the index by shrinking any of the external strings to zero size.

there must be marginal stability wall separating (a) and (b). (-3,-2) (2,0) (1,2) (2,0) (-3,-2) (1,2) (a) (b) Result for B 1 (y, z) for cases (a) and (b): { z + z 1 y y 1} { 2 y 3 1 y 3 y 1 } y { z + z 1 y y 1} { 2 y 3 1 y 3 2y 2 y + z + 1 } z

(-3,-2) (-2,-1) (1,1) (2,0) (0, -1) (1,2) 7 can break apart into the (-2,-1) string and the rest. The jump in B 1 (y, z) across this wall precisely accounts for the previous difference.

Conclusion The protected information about the spectrum of BPS states in N = 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories is encoded in the index B 1 (y, z). We now have a complete algorithm for computing this index for any charge vector at any point in the moduli space.