Brown Dwarfs and Planets around Nearby Stars. A Coronagraphic Search for. B. R. Oppenheimer (AMNH) Morino,, H. Suto,, M. Ishii, M. K.

Similar documents
Exoplanets in the mid-ir with E-ELT & METIS

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

Searching for Other Worlds

Supplemental Materials to An Imaging Survey for Extrasolar Planets around 54 Close, Young Stars with SDI at the VLT and MMT 1

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY. Planets around white dwarfs Matt Burleigh

Tue 16:40-16:55 M. Tamura AO188

Exoplanet Search Techniques: Overview. PHY 688, Lecture 28 April 3, 2009

Coronagraph Imager with Adaptive Optics (CIAO) for the Subaru 8-m Telescope

Suppressing Speckle Noise for Simultaneous Differential Extrasolar Planet Imaging (SDI) at the VLT and MMT

Brown dwarfs in their infancy and some other remaining bits

High Dynamic Range and the Search for Planets

Extrasolar Planets. Methods of detection Characterization Theoretical ideas Future prospects

The Stellar Low-Mass IMF: SDSS Observations of 15 Million M Dwarfs

High contrast imaging at 3-5 microns. Philip M. Hinz University of Arizona Matt Kenworthy, Ari Heinze, John Codona, Roger Angel

Astronomy 113. Dr. Joseph E. Pesce, Ph.D. Dr. Joseph E. Pesce, Ph.D.

Non-axisymmetric structure in million-year-old discs around intermediate-mass stars

OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS on the FORMATION of VERY LOW MASS STARS & BROWN DWARFS

Near-infrared polarimeter for the Subaru telescope

Exploring the giant planet - brown dwarf connection with astrometry. Johannes Sahlmann ESA Research Fellow at ESAC

An Adaptive Optics Survey of M8-M9 stars: Discovery of 4 Very Low Mass Binaries With at Least One System Containing a Brown Dwarf Companion

Components of Galaxies Stars What Properties of Stars are Important for Understanding Galaxies?

Direct imaging and characterization of habitable planets with Colossus

Can We See Them?! Planet Detection! Planet is Much Fainter than Star!

EPICS: A planet hunter for the European ELT

Searching for Extrasolar Planets with Simultaneous Differential Imaging

Characterization of Exoplanets in the mid-ir with JWST & ELTs

Direct imaging characterisation of (exo-) planets with METIS

Gl 86B: a white dwarf orbits an exoplanet host star

The Potential of Ground Based Telescopes. Jerry Nelson UC Santa Cruz 5 April 2002

Polarimetry and spectral imaging of mature Jupiter and super-earth with SEE-COAST

Mapping the oxygen abundance in an elliptical galaxy (NGC 5128)

Stars, Galaxies & the Universe Announcements. Stars, Galaxies & the Universe Observing Highlights. Stars, Galaxies & the Universe Lecture Outline

arxiv:astro-ph/ v3 21 Mar 2006

Chapter 8: The Family of Stars

Techniques for measuring astronomical distances generally come in two variates, absolute and relative.

Extrasolar Planet Science with High-Precision Astrometry Johannes Sahlmann

Planet Detection! Estimating f p!

Announcement: Quiz Friday, Oct 31

Speckles and adaptive optics

T Tauri Phase of Young Brown Dwarfs

Observing Summary: Target RA Dec K AB Conguration/mode Days 180 NEARBY SINGLE OTHER 45 STARS, D<10PC 500 NEARBY SINGLE OTHER 21 STARS, D<20PC 70 BROWN

Stellar Population Synthesis: The Role of Adaptive Optics

Imaging polarimetry of exo-planets with the VLT and the E-ELT Hans Martin SCHMID, ETH Zurich

Observed Properties of Stars - 2 ASTR 2110 Sarazin

Star Formation. Answering Fundamental Questions During the Spitzer Warm Mission Phase

Stars and Stellar Astrophysics. Kim Venn U. Victoria

Fundamental (Sub)stellar Parameters: Masses and Radii. PHY 688, Lecture 10

1.0 L53 1. INTRODUCTION 2. AN ADAPTIVE OPTICS SURVEY OF NEARBY M8 M9 FIELD STARS. The Astrophysical Journal, 567:L53 L57, 2002 March 1

Polarimetry and spectral imaging of mature Jupiter and super Earth SEE COAST

Extreme AO Coronagraph Science with GPI. James R. Graham UC, Berkeley

Physics 160: Stellar Astrophysics. Midterm Exam. 27 October 2011 INSTRUCTIONS READ ME!

A Survey of Stellar Families Multiplicity of Solar-type Stars

EVOLUTION OF STARS HERTZSPRUNG-RUSSELL DIAGRAM

Synergies between E-ELT and space instrumentation for extrasolar planet science

Observed Properties of Stars - 2 ASTR 2120 Sarazin

Lines of Hydrogen. Most prominent lines in many astronomical objects: Balmer lines of hydrogen

Variable stars in Trumpler 37 and follow-up of the first transit candidate

Searching for extrasolar planets with SPHERE. Mesa Dino, Raffaele Gratton, Silvano Desidera, Riccardo Claudi (INAF OAPD)

Spatial distribution of stars in the Milky Way

Potential Synergies Between MSE and the ELTs A Purely TMT-centric perspective But generally applicable to ALL ELTs

Extrasolar Planets. By: Steve Strom 1

Astronomy. Chapter 15 Stellar Remnants: White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars, and Black Holes

Synergies of Subaru and CGI. Tyler D. Groff

Techniques for direct imaging of exoplanets

Subaru Telescope Ground Layer AO System and New Near-IR Instrument

A wide brown dwarf binary around a planet-host star

1. Give short answers to the following questions. a. What limits the size of a corrected field of view in AO?

Resolved Starburst Clusters Near & Far

Science with EPICS, the E-ELT planet finder

The Gaia-ESO Spectroscopic Survey. Survey Co-PIs. Gerry Gilmore (IoA, Cambridge) & Sofia Randich (INAF/Arcetri) >300 CoIs

The Hertzprung-Russell Diagram. The Hertzprung-Russell Diagram. Question

Direct Detection of Exoplanets

Using Gravity to Measure the Mass of a Star

Planets are plentiful

Direct imaging of extra-solar planets

XMM-Newton EPIC observations of stellar clusters and star forming regions

Star Formation. Spitzer Key Contributions to Date

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 2 Oct 2002

Planet Detection. Estimating f p

Extrasolar Planets: Ushering in the Era of Comparative Exoplanetology

Astronomy 100 Spring 2006 Lecture Questions Twelve Weeks Review

Planets & Brown Dwarf Companions

4. Direct imaging of extrasolar planets. 4.1 Expected properties of extrasolar planets. Sizes of gas giants, brown dwarfs & low-mass stars

Clicker Question: Clicker Question: What is the expected lifetime for a G2 star (one just like our Sun)?

Substellar objects: Brown dwarfs and extrasolar planets

The formation of super-stellar clusters

Extrasolar Transiting Planets: Detection and False Positive Rejection

Protoplanetary discs of isolated VLMOs discovered in the IPHAS survey

Characterization of the exoplanet host stars. Exoplanets Properties of the host stars. Characterization of the exoplanet host stars

Types of Stars 1/31/14 O B A F G K M. 8-6 Luminosity. 8-7 Stellar Temperatures

V. Stars.

Big planets, little stars: Directly imaged companions to young M-stars

Dr. Reed L. Riddle. Close binaries, stellar interactions and novae. Guest lecture Astronomy 20 November 2, 2004

The cosmic distance scale

The Milky Way - 2 ASTR 2110 Sarazin. Center of the Milky Way

The magnitude system. ASTR320 Wednesday January 30, 2019

Stellar Populations: Resolved vs. unresolved

Observed Properties of Stars ASTR 2120 Sarazin

Light and Stars ASTR 2110 Sarazin

Transcription:

A Coronagraphic Search for Brown Dwarfs and Planets around Nearby Stars T. Nakajima, J.-I. Morino,, H. Suto,, M. Ishii, M. Tamura, N. Kaifu,, S. Miyama, H. Takami,, N. Takato, S. Oya, S. Hayashi, M. Hayashi (NAOJ) T. Tsuji (IoA ( IoA,, U. of Tokyo) M. Fukagawa (Nagoya U. ) K. Murakawa (MPIfR) B. R. Oppenheimer (AMNH) Y. Itoh & Y. Oasa (Kobe U.)

Outline Introduction to direct detection Parameters that control detectability Dynamic range of instruments at VLT, and Subaru Strategies at VLT Our program at Subaru Note that the focus of this talk is on high dynamic range and other efforts such as binary brown dwarf searches by adaptive optics are not included. Also the focus is on comparison between VLT and Subaru. Please comment on your own effort if I miss it during my talk.

Detectability of direct detection I apologize that my talk is technical rather than astronomical. Direct detection of a planet: photometric m(m *,M p,s,d): dynamic range in mag µ * : star mass µ p : planet mass s: separation in AU d: distance in pc M * : star abs. mag.. M p : planet abs. mag.

Parameters controlling dynamic range Parameters controlling dynamic range Giant planet detection by reflected light Sun+Jupiter placed at 10pc m m = 22.5 at θ=0.5 =0.5 No currently available instrument has this dynamic range Detection of self-luminous luminous young planets M p = M p (µ p,t) : dependences on mass and age M * = M * (µ *,t) if star is very young m m = M p - M * : small for small t Limiting mag of planet m p (limit)(θ) ) = M * + m( m(m *,M p,θ=s/d) +5log(d/10) M p (limit)(s) = M * + m( m(m *,M p,s) at d=10pc

Absolute K mag of giant planets

Absolute H mag of giant planets Spectral band for which SDI of non-cooled coronagraph is effective.

Performance of VLT/NACO Performance of VLT/NACO K = 6 at 0.5 = 9.5 at >1 For a bright target K = 10 at 0.5 = 12 at 1.5 = 13 at > 3 For a fainter target Chauvin et al. (2005)

Performance of VLT/SDI imaging Performance of VLT/SDI imaging Simultaneous Differential Imaging Removes speckle noise and obtain high dynamic range at small angular separations. Simulated performance of SDI on VLT H = 9.5 at 0.5, the highest value at small radii (ESO Messenger).

H = 14 at r=2.8 H=21 companion candidate detected at r=2.8 d=10pc (2 diameter mask) PSF subtraction is done realtime while observing. Primary PSF subtracted. H=7 primary star (120s x 6) Performance of Subaru/CIAO

K=12.5 r=2.0 K=19.5 K=18 r=1.2 K=11 K=13 r=2.5 K=20 K=12 r=1.5 K=19 Simulated planets on PSF subtracted CIAO image of a K=7 star

Performances of current instruments Performances of current instruments on VLT and Subaru VLT/NACO (AO without coronagraph, Chauvin et al. & ESO Messenger) Bright targets K = 6 at 0.5 (AO) H = 9.5 (AO+SDI) Faint targets K = 10 at 1.0 = 13 at >3.0 Subaru/CIAO (AO with coronagraph) Faint targets K = 11 at 1.2 = 13 at >2.5

Strategies at VLT Strategies at VLT Select extremely young targets t=1~8myr PMS stars or very young brown dwarf targets Both primary and companion are bright. d=140pc (Lupus, Neuhauser et al. 2005) or d=70pc (TW Hydra, Chauvin et al. 2004) Necessary dynamic range is small: K~7. Physical separations are large: s>50au. Targeting young BDs (Chauvin et al.) IR wave front sensing (BDs are invisible at visible wavelengths). IR wave front sensing (

Planet found by VLT Planet found by VLT VLT/NACOS AO w/out coronagraph IR wavefront sensing --- low mass star targets Primary: K=12 M8 brown dwarf in TW Hydra association (t=8myr, d=70pc) M~20M J Secondary: K=17 L? dwarf M~ 5M J, if the evolutionary model and temperature estimate are correct. Separation: 0.8 or 55AU Chauvin et al. (2004,2005)

K K of currently known objects AB Dor

Mass-Separation Diagram AB Dor

Our effort at Subaru Our effort at Subaru To utilize K K > 13 (or K<20) at r>2.5 d ~ 10pc (<20pc) d ~ 10pc (<20pc) --- Physical separation > 20AU Nearby stars are M+K dwarfs (0.5~0.2Mo) Kinematical age criteria Nearby stars are M+K dwarfs (0.5~0.2Mo) 3D kinematical information available for 500 M and K stars within 20pc (Reid et al. 2002) 3D kinematical information available for 500 Small random velocity with respect to LSR. Small velocity deviation from a particular SKG. Mass limit for M K <20 and t<350myr M ~ 2M J

Target dependent detection limits of Target dependent detection limits of CIAO (µ p,t) in (M J,Myr) YD:Young disk star

Nearby stellar population Nearby stellar population Henry (1998)

Age dating of stars Age dating of stars Chromospheric activity (e.g. Hα) H Strong dependence on spectral type and 1/3 of M dwarfs show this (t < 10/3~3Gyr). This is not a strong constraint. Coronal activity (X-ray emission) Sample is small and stars are at distances. (d>20pc). Kinematical age dating Small deviation of (U,V,W) from (U,V,W) LSR. Particular (U,V,W) corresponding to a young stellar kinematical group. At least one successful example exists --- Gl 229A

Kinematical age Kinematical age Velocity dispersion of stars w.r.t. local standard of rest increases as they age. Time evolution of velocity dispersion is modeled by Fuchs and Wielen (1987) Our idea Velocity deviation from V LSR is obtained for each star. Replace velocity dispersion with velocity deviation for each star and assign a particular age for each star. Even if the age assigned to each star has an error, we should be able to define a statistically meaningful sample with some age limit.

Kinematical Ages of Famous Stars Kinematical Ages of Famous Stars Note that zero-age velocity dispersion is assumed to be 10km/s by Fuchs and Wielen (1987).

Age distribution of targets Age distribution of targets

Results since August 2004 Results since August 2004 Age criterion was not so strict for the targets observed in 2004. Used CNS3 instead of Reid, Gizis & Hawley. Information on kinematics was crude. Age limit was about 700 Myr instead of 300 Myr. Mass limit was about 5M J. Mass limit was about 5M 70 stars were observed (2 nd epoch for limited targets). 70 stars were observed (2 ~20 stars were binaries. Confirmed one known BD (Gl229B) No planet confirmed so far. Massive giant planets (> 5M J ) may be rare around low mass primary stars (<0.5Mo). Massive giant planets (> 5 Not yet a statistically significant statement.

d=5.7pc FOV =114x114AU B A Mask=2 in diameter. Gl 229 system. No component C.

A target at 3pc with t<350myr A target at 3pc with t<350myr M K <23, Mask=3AU in diameter. FOV=60x60AU 2 nd epoch observing in a week from now.