Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project

Similar documents
ADM CCS Projects Experience and Lessons Learned

Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project

Developments in Storage and Monitoring for CCUS

An Assessment of Geological Carbon Sequestration in the Illinois Basin: The Illinois Basin-Decatur Site

The Illinois Basin Decatur Project Decatur, Illinois USA: Overview and Impacts. Sallie E. Greenberg

Development and Implementation of a Monitoring Plan at a 1-million Tonne CCS Demonstration: Decatur, Illinois USA

Source Sink Pipeline

The Impacts of Carbon Dioxide Storage in the Saline Arbuckle Aquifer on Water Quality in Freshwater Aquifers in Kansas

By: Jared T. Freiburg Illinois State Geological Survey 5/17/ cm

Geologic and Reservoir Characterization and Modeling

Monitoring with Time-lapse 3D VSPs at the Illinois Basin Decatur Project

West Coast Research. WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission

Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP) Press Briefing. February 21, 2008

Quarterly Report April 1 - June 30, By: Shirley P. Dutton. Work Performed Under Contract No.: DE-FC22-95BC14936

Basin-Scale Hydrological Impact of Geologic Carbon Sequestration in the Illinois Basin: A Full-Scale Deployment Scenario

Contractor Name and Address: Oxy USA, Inc. (Oxy), Midland, Texas OBJECTIVES

IBDP Pre-Injection Microseismicity

ADVANCED RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND EVALUATION OF CO, GRAVITY DRAINAGE IN T H E NATU RALLY FRACTU RED S P RABERRY RES ERVOl R

Prepared. PO Box 880. Scott C. Ayash. John A. Hamling Edward N. Steadman John A. Harju. University. Grand Forks,

Geologic CO 2 Storage Options for California

BASAL CAMBRIAN BASELINE GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION COMPLETED

MIDWEST REGIONAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION PARTNERSHIP PHASE II STORAGE CAPACITY POTENTIAL OVERVIEW

Basin-scale Modeling of CO 2 Sequestration in the Illinois Basin Status Report

Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Test

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

DISCLAIMER BASIN, WEST TEXAS AND NEW MEXICO

Available online at GHGT-9. Elsevier use only: Received date here; revised date here; accepted date here

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (03/lfi?lfibr-~/15/1998):

SECARB Phase III ANTHROPOGENIC TEST: Risk Management through Detailed Geologic Characterization and Modeling

CO2 Storage- Project list

region includes nine states and four provinces, covering over 1.4 million square miles. The PCOR Partnership

Valley-Fill Sandstones in the Kootenai Formation on the Crow Indian Reservation, South-Central Montana

A Geological and Geophysical Assessment of the Royal Center Gas Storage Field in North-Central Indiana, a Joint NIPSCO, DOE & GRI Case Study

Plasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques

FRIO BRINE SEQUESTRATION PILOT IN THE TEXAS GULF COAST

Project Number (DE-FE ) Jason Rush (W. Lynn Watney, Joint PI) Kansas Geological Survey University of Kansas

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

Valley-Fill Sandstones in the Kootenai Formation on the Crow Indian Reservation, South-Central Montana

Kentucky Geological Survey Marvin Blan #1 Hancock County, Kentucky Geologic Review. J. Richard Bowersox David A. Williams Kentucky Geological Survey

FINAL REPORT INTEGRATING P-WAVE AND S-WAVE SEISMIC DATA TO IMPROVE CHARACTERIZATION OF OIL RESERVOIRS. Innocent J. Aluka

Recommendations for Injection and Storage Monitoring

Project Assessment and Evaluation of the Area of Review (AoR) at the Citronelle SECARB Phase III Site, Alabama USA

Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership

Geological CO 2 Storage Feasibility Study: Saline Aquifers and Depleted Oil Fields, Ordos Basin, Shaanxi Province

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

Measurement, Monitoring and Verification (MMV)

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

Determine the Inside Wall Temperature of DSTs using an Infrared Temperature Sensor

Magnetic Measurements of the Elliptical Multipole Wiggler Prototype

Determine the Inside Wall Temperature of DSTs using an Infrared Temperature Sensor

PROCEEDINGS THIRD WORKSHOP GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR ENGINEERING. December 14-15,1977

Saline Formations MRCSP and Mountaineer Update

Tell uric prof i 1 es across the Darrough Known Geothermal Resource Area, Nevada. Harold Kaufniann. Open-file Report No.

Clifford K. Ho and Michael L. Wilson Sandia National Laboratories. P.O. Box Albuquerque, NM

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF SOLVENT TRANSPORT IN POLYMER NETWORKS

IMULTISTAGE/MULTIFUNCTION COLUMN

RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES AT THE CNS (Y-12 AND PANTEX) NUCLEAR DETECTION AND SENSOR TESTING CENTERS (NDSTC)

12/16/95-3/15/96 PERIOD MULTI-PARAMETER ON-LINE COAL BULK ANALYSIS. 2, 1. Thermal Neutron Flux in Coal: New Coal Container Geometry

ILLINOIS GROUNDWATER - BEDROCK

Half-Cell, Steady-State Flow-Battery Experiments. Robert M. Darling and Mike L. Perry

Semi-Annual Report September 1, March 1,1997

Internal microseismic event pattern revealed by waveform cross-correlation analysis

Hydra Fault Current Limiting HTS Cable to be Installed in the Consolidated Edison Grid

Microscale Chemistry Technology Exchange at Argonne National Laboratory - East

Inside Wall Temperature Measurements of DSTs Using an Infrared Temperature Sensor

Development of a High Intensity EBIT for Basic and Applied Science

Simulation of Double-Null Divertor Plasmas with the UEDGE Code

ION EXCHANGE SEPARATION OF PLUTONIUM AND GALLIUM (1) Resource and Inventory Requirements, (2) Waste, Emissions, and Effluent, and (3) Facility Size

Developments on Microseismic Monitoring and Risk Assessment of Large-scale CO 2 Storage

GA A26474 SYNERGY IN TWO-FREQUENCY FAST WAVE CYCLOTRON HARMONIC ABSORPTION IN DIII-D

(4) How do you develop an optimal signal detection technique from the knowledge of

Status and Progress of a Fault Current Limiting HTS Cable To Be Installed In The Consolidated Edison Grid

Process Systems Engineering

SACCCS Test Injection Workshop

GA A23736 EFFECTS OF CROSS-SECTION SHAPE ON L MODE AND H MODE ENERGY TRANSPORT

IN POLAND. Adam WÓJCICKI. National Research Institute

3D Time-lapse Seismic Modeling for CO2 Sequestration

SUCCESS. Critical Elements and Superior Strategy

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (06/16/1998-9/15/1998):

Brine Disposal Reservoirs in the Appalachian Basin: Injection Performance and Geological Properties

Introduction to Part III Examining wildlife distributions and abundance using boat surveys

BWXT Y-12 Y-12. A BWXT/Bechtel Enterprise SMALL, PORTABLE, LIGHTWEIGHT DT NEUTRON GENERATOR FOR USE WITH NMIS

THE DISCOVERY OF FULLERENES IN THE 1.85 BILLION-YEAR-OLD

GYPSY FIELD PROJECT IN RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION

Department of Petroleum Engineering.

Synthesis of Methyl Methacrylate from Coal-derived Syngas

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

Current challenges at CO 2 Sites

GA A22689 SLOW LINER FUSION

Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Technologies

Alex Dombos Michigan State University Nuclear and Particle Physics

Geologic Storage (Almacenamiento Geológico) Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 )

WP 4.1. Site selection criteria and ranking methodology. Karen Kirk

Fission-Fusion Neutron Source

GA A24166 SUPER-INTENSE QUASI-NEUTRAL PROTON BEAMS INTERACTING WITH PLASMA: A NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION

Needs Assessment: Permitting, i Data Management, Operations

Seismic mapping of the Utsira Formation. Petrophysical interpretations and fracture gradient estimates.

August 3,1999. Stiffness and Strength Properties for Basic Sandwich Material Core Types UCRL-JC B. Kim, R.M. Christensen.

The Ketzin Test Site (former CO 2 Sink-project)

GA A27857 IMPACT OF PLASMA RESPONSE ON RMP ELM SUPPRESSION IN DIII-D

Transcription:

Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project Eliminating CO2 Emissions from the Production of Bio Fuels - A Green Carbon Process Envisioning a Carbon Negative Economy Workshop September 5, 2014 Scott McDonald Biofuels Development Director scott.mcdonald@adm.com

Acknowledgements The Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage (ICCS) project is administered by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy and managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (award number DE-FE-0001547) and by a cost share agreement with the Archer Daniels Midland Company, University of Illinois through the Illinois State Geological Survey, Schlumberger Carbon Services, and Richland Community College. This ICCS project received DOE funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ($141.4 million). The Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy through the National Energy Technology Laboratory via the Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Program (contract number DE-FC26-05NT42588) and by a cost share agreement with the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, Office of Coal Development through the Illinois Clean Coal Institute. The Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) is a collaboration led by the geological surveys of Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky

ADM Company Profile Core Purpose Connecting the harvest to the home and transforming crops into products that serve vital needs for food and energy. Key Facts Facilities FY 2013 Net Sales: Employees: 31,000 Processing 74,000 MTD of corn 164,000 MTD of oilseeds 28,000 MTD of wheat 1,800 MTD of cocoa Logistics 27,400 Rail cars 2,500 Barges 600 Trucks 1,300 Trailers 52 Oceangoing vessels Over 700 with sales in 140 Countries $90 billion Sourcing facilities Oilseed processing Corn processing Cocoa & wheat processing Wilmar Sourcing distribution Processing distribution

Illinois Basin Decatur Project (IBDP) Program Objective Large scale geologic test to inject 1.0 million tons of CO 2 over a three year period (1,000 MT/day). Project Team Members Knowledge Base - Site Geological Characterization - Risk Assessment & Reservoir Modeling - Engineering Design & MVA Breaking ground for anthropogenic CO 2 storage in a saline reservoir using cuttingedge storage technology

Illinois Industrial CCS Project (IL-ICCS) Program Objectives - Target & Demonstrate Advanced CCS Technologies at Industrial Scale Facilities - Inject and Store One Million Tons of CO 2 Annually (3,000 tons/day) Project Team Members Knowledge Base - Site Geological Characterization - Risk Assessment & Reservoir Modeling - Engineering Design & MVA - Education and Public Outreach Study the interaction between the CO 2 plumes from two injection wells within the same formation.

Project Process Flow Diagram Centrifugal Blower (3000 HP) CO 2 CO 2 Inlet Separator Water Wet CO 2 from Corn-to-Ethanol Fermentation Reciprocating Compressors (3250 HP) 4 Stages with Intercoolers CO 2 P=35 24-in line 1500-ft 3 rd Stage Discharge CO 2 P=590 Regenerator Reboiler 4 th Stage Discharge CO 2 P=1425 Dehydrated CO 2 to 4 th Stage Water Centrifugal Booster Pump (400 HP) Tri-ethylene Glycol Dehydration Unit CO 2 Contactor Glycol Regenerator Return Dry Glycol CO 2 Sequestration ~7,000 ft. depth in Mt. Simon Sandstone Supercritical CO 2 8-in, 1-mile Pipeline 2500-3000 MTPD M<0.005 Injection Well P set by permit (estimate < 2300) Primary Source of Drinking Water (D=140) New Albany Shale (D=2000, T=120): Tertiary Seal Maquoketa Shale (D=2600, T=200): Secondary Seal St. Peter Sandstone Lower Most USDW (D=4000) Eau Claire Shale (D=5000, T=500): Primary Seal Mt. Simon Sandstone (D=5500, T=1600): Saline Reservoir Pre-Cambrian Granite (D=7200)

Site Selection Regional Geologic Characterization Cratonic basin 60,000 square mile area Structurally complex to the south with faulting and seismicity ADM ADM Decatur facility is located near the center of this geologic formation Estimated CO 2 storage capacity between 27 to 109 billion metric tons

Site Characterization Seismic Acquisition

Site Characterization Evaluation of the Decatur Site The ADM site has excellent features for CO 2 storage High purity source of CO 2 Thick permeable formation for storage. Porosity <20% and permeability 26 md Formation depth Thick seal with no resolvable faulting Additional seal formations No local penetrations of the primary seal formation Low population density Top: Eau Claire Top: Mt. Simon Channel Top: Higher porosity zone within the Mt. Simon produced with Petrel

Test Well Construction

Coring and Well Logging

Core Analysis Results

VW2: Petrophysical Analysis and Completion Plan Middle Mt Simon CCS2 inject interval CCS1 inject interval Lower Mt Simon Pre Mt Simon Weathered PC PC Resistivity Porosity Permeability Porosity Lithology Pore Size NMR T2 Compared to Petrophysical Analysis Zones of Interest Mount Simon (Upper, Middle, Lower) Pre Mount Simon Weathered Pre Cambrian Pre Cambrian Basement IC zones 1,2,3 in lower Mt Simon IC zones 4,5 in upper Mt Simon

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Geophysical Modeling

Site Permitting USEPA: UIC Class VI Permit UIC Class VI permit application submitted on July 25, 2011. US EPA Region V issued a draft permit on April 15, 2014. Public hearing conducted on May 21, 2014. Public Comment Period concluded May 31, 2014. Expect the final permit in September 2014. 1 st UIC Class VI Permit Application Reviewed by the USEPA

Environmental Monitoring (MVA) Conceptual Framework Near Surface Deep Subsurface Soil and Vadose Zone Ground Water Above Seal Injection Zone Aerial Imagery Soil CO 2 Flux Geochemical Sampling P/T Monitoring Geophysical Surveys Seismic Monitoring P Monitoring Geophysical Surveys Geochemical sampling P/T Monitoring

Environmental Monitoring Near Surface Monitoring Near infrared aerial imagery will be used to evaluate plant stress Soil resistivity characterized shallow depths for identification of optimum GWM locations GWM for baseline conditions and operational surveillance Surface soil CO 2 flux monitoring

Environmental Monitoring Deep Subsurface Monitoring CCS#2 T/P monitoring Distributed Temp Sensor VM#2 Westbay system Multi-level sampling ports reservoir fluid collection and T/P monitoring GM#2 has 31 sensor array Pressure sensor to monitor above the seal Allow offset or walkaway Vertical Seismic Profile (VSP) Well logging (RST)

Deep Seismic Monitoring 3 Geophones in CCS1 24 Active Geophones in GM1 Monitoring Started May 2010 Geoware LTD is processing data SCS analyzing results Processing of pre-injection data Plan view

Deep Seismic Monitoring Slim Wave Retrievable Geophones

Seismic Monitoring Data 800 700 Frequency of Detected Events/ Day 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2/1/12 5/11/12 8/19/12 Time 11/27/12 3/7/13

Construction - Compression

Construction - Dehydration

Construction - Collection

Construction Transfer Line 24 Low Pressure CO 2 Transfer Line

Construction Transmission Line

Carbonates CO 2 Based Chemicals Glycerol Carbonate Propylene Carbonate Dimethyl Carbonate Fertilizers Alcohols Fuels Acids Others Transformation of Carbon Dioxide, Sakakura, Choi, & Yasuda, 2007

Enhanced Oil Production

Illinois Basin Potential ADM Plants 10,000 TPD Illinois Basin - Oil Producing Region Est. Recoverable Oil = 700 million bbls (1) Est. CO 2 Requirements = 150 million tons (1) BASIN ORIENTED STRATEGIES FOR CO2 ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY: ILLINOIS AND MICHIGAN BASIN OF ILLINOIS, INDIANA, KENTUCKY AND MICHIGAN; Advanced Resources International, February 2006

Future Commercial Potential Direct Application EOR CO 2 Liquids Product Development CO 2 Based Chemicals Process Development SC Extraction Solvent Applications Carbon Management Storage Trading & Risk Management

Environmental and Cost Benefits GHG Reduction & Fuel LCA Reduction in site s CO 2 emissions. Process has a GHG reduction efficiency of 94% based on using Midwest electricity grid average. Reduction of the carbon footprint of fuel ethanol. The operational expense is significantly lower than other forms of CO 2 capture. 15 billion gallons annually, represents about 40 million metric tons of CO 2.

Thank You! Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage Project: U.S. Department of Energy Award No. DE-FE-0001547 Administered by the DOE s Office of Fossil Energy Managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory DOE cost share from American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Cost Share Agreements: Archer Daniels Midland Company University of Illinois through the Illinois State Geological Survey Schlumberger Carbon Services Richland Community College Project Team Members Contacts: Dr. Sai Gollakota (NETL-DOE) Sai.Gollakota@NETL.DOE.GOV Dr. Robert Finley, (ISGS) finley@isgs.illinois.edu John Medler, (Schlumberger Carbon Services) jmedler@slb.com Dr. Douglas Brauer (RCC) dbrauer@richland.edu (Disclaimer: Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.)