The Pan-STARRS Moving Object Pipeline

Similar documents
Asteroid Detection with the Pan-STARRS Moving Object Processing System

Efficient intra- and inter-night linking of asteroid detections using kd-trees

LSST: Comprehensive NEO detection, characterization, and orbits

PS1 Moving Object Processing System (MOPS) Software Requirement Specification (SRS)

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 10 Nov 2015

Projected Near-Earth Object Discovery Performance of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

WISE (Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer)

Unbiased orbit determination for the next generation asteroid/comet surveys

How do telescopes work? Simple refracting telescope like Fuertes- uses lenses. Typical telescope used by a serious amateur uses a mirror

Asteroid Models from the Pan-STARRS Photometry

Physical models of asteroids from sparse photometric data

Detecting Near Earth Asteroids with a Constellation of Cubesats with Synthetic Tracking Cameras. M. Shao, S. Turyshev, S. Spangelo, T. Werne, C.

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 27 Jun 2017

NEOFIXER A BROKER FOR NEAR EARTH ASTEROID FOLLOW-UP ROB SEAMAN & ERIC CHRISTENSEN CATALINA SKY SURVEY

Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE)

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 29 Nov 2017

2 The PanSTARRS PS1 NEO Survey

The Pan-STARRS Moving Object Processing System

Spacewatch and Follow-up Astrometry of Near-Earth Objects

Transient Alerts in LSST. 1 Introduction. 2 LSST Transient Science. Jeffrey Kantor Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Precision Tracking of Decimeter Targets at GEO Distances using the Magdalena Ridge Observatory 2.4-meter Telescope

Some ML and AI challenges in current and future optical and near infra imaging datasets

Automated Prototype for Asteroids Detection

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA Institute for Astrononmy

Astroinformatics: massive data research in Astronomy Kirk Borne Dept of Computational & Data Sciences George Mason University

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 29 Mar 2012

An optimal search strategy for Trojan asteroids and science follow-up of GAIA alerts with the Zadko Telescope, Western Australia

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 3 Aug 2004

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

An end-to-end simulation framework for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Andrew Connolly University of Washington

ANTARES: The Arizona-NOAO Temporal Analysis and Response to Events System

WMOPS. Clean DetecHons of Newly Discovered Solar System Objects by WISE

Real Astronomy from Virtual Observatories

Surprise Detection in Science Data Streams Kirk Borne Dept of Computational & Data Sciences George Mason University

Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Near Earth Object Observations Program

Machine Learning Applications in Astronomy

From DES to LSST. Transient Processing Goes from Hours to Seconds. Eric Morganson, NCSA LSST Time Domain Meeting Tucson, AZ May 22, 2017

Near-Earth Asteroids Orbit Propagation with Gaia Observations

A Planetary Defense Policy

Scientific Data Flood. Large Science Project. Pipeline

A search for main-belt comets in the Palomar Transient Factory survey

Asteroids Detection Tehnique: Classic Blink

Surprise Detection in Multivariate Astronomical Data Kirk Borne George Mason University

LSST Discovery Potential for Solar System Science and Planetary Defense

Pan-Planets. A Search for Transiting Planets Around Cool stars. J. Koppenhoefer, Th. Henning and the Pan-PlanetS Team

Topocentric Orbit Determination: Algorithms for the Next Generation Surveys

Time Domain Astronomy in the 2020s:

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 15 Sep 2016

Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie Dr. Markus Pössel, Center for Astronomy Education and Outreach

Near Earth Objects The NEO Observation Program and Planetary Defense. Lindley Johnson Planetary Science Division NASA HQ 15 January 2013

Brendan Krueger Phy 688, Spring 2009 May 6 th, 2009

The Minor Planet Center Data Processing System. Matthew J. Holman Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Of Minor Planets

Gaia Astrometry Upkeeping by GNSS - Evaluation Study [GAUGES]

University of Hawai'i at Mänoa

Mony a Mickle Maks a Muckle:

PAN-PLANETS. Searching for Hot Jupiters around Cool Stars. Christian Obermeier Johannes Koppenhöfer, Thomas Henning, Roberto Saglia

C. Watson, E. Churchwell, R. Indebetouw, M. Meade, B. Babler, B. Whitney

Rotation period determination for asteroid 9021 Fagus

Science Results Enabled by SDSS Astrometric Observations

Suspected Asteroid Collision

The Zadko Telescope: the Australian Node of a Global Network of Fully Robotic Follow-up Telescopes

NEARBY Platform for Detecting Asteroids in Astronomical Images Using Cloud-based Containerized Applications

A STRATEGY FOR FINDING NEAR-EARTH OBJECTS WITH THE SDSS TELESCOPE

Update on NASA NEO Program

Automatic Star-tracker Optimization Framework. Andrew Tennenbaum The State University of New York at Buffalo

1 A photometric probe for Pan-STARRS

Here Be Dragons: Characterization of ACS/WFC Scattered Light Anomalies

Astr 598: Astronomy with SDSS. Spring Quarter 2004, University of Washington, Željko Ivezić. Lecture 4: Moving Objects Detected by SDSS

SDSS Data Management and Photometric Quality Assessment

The B612 Foundation Sentinel Mission. Ed Lu CEO, B612 Foundation

NEAR-EARTH ASTEROIDS Positions of all known asteroids projected onto the plane of the Earth s orbit on Jan 20, 2008

Optical Synoptic Telescopes: New Science Frontiers *

APLUS: A Data Reduction Pipeline for HST/ACS and WFC3 Images

Spitzer Space Telescope Calibration Strategy: The Use of Asteroids

ASTEROID DETECTION WITH THE SPACE SURVEILLANCE TELESCOPE. Ronak Shah MIT Lincoln Laboratory. Deborah F. Woods MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Asteroid Mitigation Strategy. By Emily Reit, Trevor Barton, Mark Fischer, Eric Swank, and Garrett Baerr

Near Earth Object Observations Program

The SKYGRID Project A Calibration Star Catalog for New Sensors. Stephen A. Gregory Boeing LTS. Tamara E. Payne Boeing LTS. John L. Africano Boeing LTS

Astronomy of the Next Decade: From Photons to Petabytes. R. Chris Smith AURA Observatory in Chile CTIO/Gemini/SOAR/LSST

Space Administration. Don Yeomans/JPL. Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 8 Jan 2019

Image Processing in Astronomy: Current Practice & Challenges Going Forward

How occultations improve asteroid shape models

The Number Density of Asteroids in the Asteroid Main-belt

Boardworks Ltd Asteroids and Comets

Measuring Radial Velocities of Low Mass Eclipsing Binaries

LSST Pipelines and Data Products. Jim Bosch / LSST PST / January 30, 2018

Earth and space-based NEO survey simulations: prospects for achieving the Spaceguard Goal

The Trouble with 'Planets'

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 6 Jul 2013

PROJECT PAN-STARRS AND THE OUTER SOLAR SYSTEM

Searching for known asteroids in the WFI archive using Astro-WISE

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 18 Jun 2009

Identication of asteroids and comets: update on methods and results

Rotation Rates of Koronis Family Asteroid (1029) La Plata

Calculating the Occurrence Rate of Earth-Like Planets from the NASA Kepler Mission

Transneptunian Orbit Computation

Brightness variation distributions among main belt asteroids from sparse light curve sampling with Pan-STARRS 1

Synergies between and E-ELT

Transcription:

Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI O4-1 ASP Conference Series, Vol. XXX, 2006 R.Shaw,F.HillandD.Bell,eds. The Pan-STARRS Moving Object Pipeline Larry Denneau, Jr. Pan-STARRS, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, Email: denneau@ifa.hawaii.edu Jeremy Kubica Google, Inc., Pittsburg, PA, Email: jkubica@gmail.com Robert Jedicke Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, Email: jedicke@ifa.hawaii.edu Abstract. The Moving Object Processing System (MOPS) team of the University of Hawaii s Pan-STARRS telescope is developing software to automatically discover and identify >90% of near-earth objects (NEOs) 300m in diameter and >80% of other classes of asteroids and comets. MOPS relies on new, efficient multiple-hypothesis KD-tree and variabletree search algorithms developed by Kubica and the Carnegie Mellon AUTON Laboratory to search the 10 12 detection pairs obtained per night. Candidate intra- and inter-night associations of detections are evaluated for consistency with a real solar system object and orbits are computed. We describe the basic operation of the MOPS pipeline, identify pipeline processing steps that are candidates for multiple-hypothesis spatial searches, describe our implementation of those algorithms and provide preliminary results for MOPS. 1. Introduction The Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) under development by Institute for Astronomy at the University of Hawaii will provide state-of-the-art capability in several areas: four wide-field (7 deg 2 ) identical telescopes operating in parallel, a 1.4-gigapixel orthogonal transfer array (OTA) detector for each telescope, 0.01-arcsecond astrometric precision, and a limiting magnitude of R = 24. In a single night Pan-STARRS will observe approximately 6000 deg 2 of sky. All combined, this capability will allow Pan- STARRS to perform automated asteroid searching on an unprecedented scale. The Pan-STARRS single prototype telescope, called PS1, is expected to see first light in 2007, followed by the complete four-telescope system, PS4, in 2010. The Moving Object Processing System (MOPS) client of the Pan-STARRS Image Processing Pipeline (IPP) is developing software to automatically discover and identify >90% of near-earth objects (NEOs) 300m in diameter and >80% 1

2 Denneau, Kubica & Jedicke of other classes of asteroids and comets. MOPS is a traditional software pipeline that runs unattended and continuously to perform its asteroid discovery. 2. MOPS Synthetic Solar System The MOPS Synthetic Solar System (SSS) is an artifically-generated population of 11 million objects that represent various populations of objects that will be discovered by MOPS. The SSS exists so that the MOPS pipeline can be developed and verified using realistic data and so that operating efficiencies can be monitored. During the operation of PS4, the MOPS will require a way to measure how efficiently it is processing its input data stream. The MOPS will estimate its operating efficiency on real sky data by injecting its full synthetic model into the real data stream and then extract efficiency parameters from the synthetic stream after processing. As the MOPS discovers and verifies new objects, in particular near-earth objects (NEOs) and potentially hazardous objects (PHOs), orbital parameters and observations will be reported to external sources for further evaluation of impact hazard. 3. Intra-Night Linking Each night, the MOPS will search its detections database in order to identify intra-night linkages called tracklets. The simplest tracklet will be a pair of detections obtained within a 30-minute transient time interval (TTI). At 5σ there will be roughly 200 false detections deg 2, which is comparable to the expected sky-plane density of asteroids on the ecliptic (and therefore also comparable to the density of synthetic detections on the sky). At 1 deg/day an object will move about 75 arcsec ( 375 pixels) in a 30-minute TTI. To identify objects moving this fast requires linking all possible pairs of detections in an image that lie within 375 pixels of one another. Fully 50% of pairings attempted in this manner will be incorrectly linked tracklets. The vast majority of solar system objects move slower than about 1 deg/day, and for fast-moving objects there is other information available to reduce the false tracklet rate (detection flux and shape). For instance, at 1 deg/day an object will move about 4.2 pixels in a 30s exposure (assuming 0.3 pixel scale). It is expected that typical Pan-STARRS images will have PSFs on the order of 0.6 and at this rate of motion these objects will suffer trailing losses and measurably distend the appearance of the detection. Tracklets are identified using KD-tree spatial sorting and indexing. KD-tree algorithms can rapidly identify all tracklets in a single night s fields in tens of minutes on a typical science-grade PC. Given the constraints available to the algorithm that will identify tracklets it is expected that the false tracklet rate will be less than a percent.

3 Figure 1. Conceptual diagram of intra-night linking. Note that some fast-moving detections have been associated over large distances using elongation information present in the detection. 4. Inter-Night Linking Following the completion of intra-night linking, the MOPS uses the new tracklets linkages and attempts to link them with old tracklets from previous nights. These associations are called tracks. The simplest manner to envisage the process is to extrapolate each tracklet s motion vector to a pre-specified time on the other nights. If the extrapolated position and motion vector coincides with another tracklet on another night then assume that both tracklets represent the same object and use the internight motion to predict the object s location and motion vector on other nights. Once multiple nights of tracklets are linked into a track for a proposed object, an initial orbit determination (IOD) will be computed for the detections in the track. If a sufficiently good IOD is obtained (with low residuals), the MOPS will attempt a differentially-corrected orbit determination. If a sufficiently low residual is again achieved, the track is considered provisionally to be a real object and is inserted into the MOPS database. Otherwise the tracklets are released back into the pool for further processing. The combinatoric complexity of linking millions of tracklets together over many nights is intractable without special spatial indexing and searching. For this problem, MOPS uses a variable-tree algorithm developed by Jeremy Kubica and Carnegie Mellon s AUTON Laboratory. The variable-tree approach generates model tracks using endpoint tracklets at some starting and ending time, then looks for support tracks that satisfy the models. 5. Results The Pan-STARRS MOPS team has performed simulations using full sky-plane density of asteroids and expected density of false detections. With these simulations, MOPS is able to achieve > 99.9% efficiency in its intra-night linkages. The only reason the MOPS is not at 100% is that the intra-night linker is aggresive:

4 Denneau, Kubica & Jedicke y T 1 x T 2 T 3 T 4 t Figure 2. Conceptual diagram of inter-night linking. Model tracks are generated using tracklets at times T1 and T4. Support tracks are obtained from times T2 and T3. When a sufficient number of support tracks are obtained, the linkage is returned to MOPS for orbit determination. a small fraction of correct linkages are incorrectly linked into three-detection tracklets with an incorrect detection. Currently we do not believe that this loss will hurt the MOPS s overall efficiency. In Inter-night linking, the MOPS is able to achieve > 97% efficiency with NEOs and > 98% of main belt objects. Losses in intra-night linking are primarily due to non-quadratic sky-plane motion of asteroids; these objects are lost in the variable-tree approach since the variable-tree model requires quadratic sky-plane motion. It is possible to open up thresholds in the variable tree processing to accept larger deviations from quadratic motion at the cost of many more false tracks (and thus greater post-processing). Using current tresholds, variable-tree linking generates nearly 300-to-1 false linkages to correct linkages. Tables 1 and 2 summarize MOPS intra- and inter-night linking performance. The MOPS team is encouraged with these results and believes that KDtree and variable-tree spatial searching will allow MOPS and Pan-STARRS to achieve its NEO discovery goals. Table 1. MOPS Intra-night linking performance. Tracklets Available Found Percent 636,251 635,678 99.91% Acknowledgments. We are extremely grateful to Carnegie Mellon University and LSST Corporation for their contribution to development of MOPS.

5 Table 2. MOPS Inter-night linking performance. Type Available Found Percent NEO 350 340 97.1% MB 151,084 148,526 98.3% TNO 275 274 99.6% False 45M N/A 286X References Kubica, J., Moore, A., Connolly, R., & Jedicke, R. 2005. A Multiple Tree Algorithm for the Efficient Association of Asteroid Observations. The Eleventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2005), ACM Press, Eds. Robert L. Grossman and Roberto Bayardo and Kristin Bennett and Jaideep Vaidya, p. 138-146. Kubica, J., Denneau, L., Grav, T., Heasley, J., Jedicke, R., Masiero, J., & Tholen, D. Efficient Intra- and Inter-night Linking of Asteroid Detections using KD-Trees. 2006. In preparation. Bottke, W. F., Jedicke, R., Morbidelli, A., Petit, J. & Gladman, B. Understanding the Distribution of Near-Earth Asteroids. Science, 288:21902194, 2000. Jedicke, R. Pan-STARRS Moving Object Pipeline Requirements, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2003. Kaiser, N., Pan-STARRS Project Team. Asteroid Collision Hazard Reduction Requirements, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2004. Chesley, S., Heasley, J., Jedicke, R. & Spahr, T. MOPS: NEO Preliminary Orbit Calculation Studies, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2004. Jedicke, R. ACM 2005 Plenary Oral Presentation, 2005. Petit, J.-M., Holman, M., Scholl, H., Kavelaars, J. & Gladman, B. An automated moving object detection package. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 347, 471480, 2004.