Rice University Physics 332 LIFETIME OF THE MUON I. INTRODUCTION...2! II. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES...3! III. ANALYSIS PROCEDURES...7!

Similar documents
MEASURING THE LIFETIME OF THE MUON

PARTICLES REVELATION THROUGH SCINTILLATION COUNTER

Copyright 2008, University of Chicago, Department of Physics. Experiment VI. Gamma Ray Spectroscopy

Nuclear Lifetimes. = (Eq. 1) (Eq. 2)

Review of Particle Properties: ( ). See the review section on Cosmic Rays under Astrophysics and Cosmology.

Measuring the Muon Lifetime

SCINTILLATION DETECTORS & GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY: AN INTRODUCTION

Measurement of Mean μ-lifetime

Measuring Cosmic Ray Muon Decay Constant and Flux

Cosmic Ray Muons Research Project

Measurement of Muon Lifetime

COSMIC RAY MUONS. v4.1 Last Revision: R. A. Schumacher, May 2017

Measuring the lifetime of cosmic ray muons

Cosmic Ray Counting. I v = cm 2 s 1 str 1,

9/27 JUNE 2003 SUMMER STAGE PARTICLES REVELATION THROUGH CERENKOV AND SCINTILLATION COUNTER AND THE CEBAF EXPERIMENT

Scintillation Detector

Calibration of the Modular Neutron Array (MoNA)

Cosmic Rays Detector. Use of Coincidence Detector for Measures of Cosmic Rays. Lodovico Lappetito. RivelatoreRaggiCosmici_ENG - 6/22/2015 Page 1

Cosmic Ray Detector Software

Radioactivity and Ionizing Radiation

THE GEIGER-MULLER TUBE AND THE STATISTICS OF RADIOACTIVITY

Figure 1. Decay Scheme for 60Co

Radioactivity APPARATUS INTRODUCTION PROCEDURE

John Ellison University of California, Riverside. Quarknet 2008 at UCR

The Mössbauer Effect

THE COMPTON EFFECT Last Revised: January 5, 2007

Muon Telescope at BEO Moussala *

Cosmic Ray Muon Detection

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Cosmic Muon Shower Study with QuarkNet

HiSPARC Detector - Detector Station

E. K. A. ADVANCED PHYSICS LABORATORY STATISTICS OF COUNTING WITH A GEIGER COUNTER ARTIFICIAL RADIOACTIVITY

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 3 Feb 2011

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

ORTEC. Counters/Ratemeters/ Multichannel Scalers. Choosing the Right Counting Solution. The Basic Functions of Counting Systems

Study of the Scintillation Detector Efficiency and Muon Flux

Gamma Spectroscopy. References: Objectives:

LAB 4: Gamma-ray coincidence spectrometry (2018)

MUON LIFETIME MEASUREMENT EXPERIMENT

Mass of the electron m 0

Cosmic Rays: A Way to Introduce Modern Physics Concepts. Steve Schnetzer

Muon Detector. PMT coupled Plastic Scintillator for Cosmic Muons Detection. Lodovico Lappetito. RilevatoreMuoni_ENG - 18/11/2015 Pag.

Radioactivity. PC1144 Physics IV. 1 Objectives. 2 Equipment List. 3 Theory

MESUREMENT OF MUON LIFETIME USING COSMIC MUON STOPPED IN PLASTIC SCINTILLATOR DETECTOR.

Equalisation of the PMT response to charge particles for the Lucid detector of the ATLAS experiment

RADIOACTIVITY IN THE AIR

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

Cherenkov Detector. Cosmic Rays Cherenkov Detector. Lodovico Lappetito. CherenkovDetector_ENG - 28/04/2016 Pag. 1

Foundations of Modern Physics by Tipler, Theory: The dierential equation which describes the population N(t) is. dn(t) dt.

Measuring the Speed of Light on a Nanosecond Time Scale

SiPM & Plastic Scintillator

dn(t) dt where λ is the constant decay probability per unit time. The solution is N(t) = N 0 exp( λt)

Absolute activity measurement

Phys 243 Lab 7: Radioactive Half-life

Random Coincidence between two Independent Pulses

Investigation of Combined Positive and Negative Muon Decay in a Scintillator

VARIABLE ALTITUDE MUON DETECTION AND ENERGY DEPENDENCE OF COSMIC RAY MUONS

PMT Signal Attenuation and Baryon Number Violation Background Studies. By: Nadine Ayoub Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University August 5, 2011

Calibration of large water-cherenkov Detector at the Sierra Negra site of LAGO

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT: NUCLEAR MEDICINE. Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah

Neutron pulse height analysis (R405n)

Cosmic rays and the muon lifetime 1

Positron-Electron Annihilation

Neutron flux measurement using fast-neutron activation of 12 B and 12 N isotopes in hydrocarbonate scintillators

Muon Decay Simulation Experiment

Jazan University College of Science Physics Department. Lab Manual. Nuclear Physics (2) 462 Phys. 8 th Level. Academic Year: 1439/1440

Experiment Radioactive Decay of 220 Rn and 232 Th Physics 2150 Experiment No. 10 University of Colorado

PoS(PhotoDet 2012)010

Beam diagnostics: Alignment of the beam to prevent for activation. Accelerator physics: using these sensitive particle detectors.

The Compton Effect. Martha Buckley MIT Department of Physics, Cambridge, MA (Dated: November 26, 2002)

ENERGY AND TIME CONSTANTS IN RC CIRCUITS By: Iwana Loveu Student No Lab Section: 0003 Date: February 8, 2004

Looking at Cosmic Muons to verify Einstein's Special Relativity

DIGITAL PULSE SHAPE ANALYSIS WITH PHOSWICH DETECTORS TO SIMPLIFY COINCIDENCE MEASUREMENTS OF RADIOACTIVE XENON

章飞虹 ZHANG FeiHong INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SUBNUCLEAR PHYSICS Ph.D. student from Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing

Lab 6 - Electron Charge-To-Mass Ratio

Comments on the possible observation of d-d fusion in sonoluminescence (Reference-31 in Taleyarkhan et al. [2002] 1 )

ORTEC. Time-to-Amplitude Converters and Time Calibrator. Choosing the Right TAC. Timing with TACs

Overview: In this experiment we study the decay of a radioactive nucleus, Cesium 137. Figure 1: The Decay Modes of Cesium 137

Experimental studies of East-West effect of the charge ratio of atmospheric muons with energies relevant to the atmospheric neutrino anomaly

Modern Physics Laboratory Beta Spectroscopy Experiment

Monte Carlo Simulations for Future Geoneutrino Detectors

Lifetime Measurement

Overview: In this experiment we will study the decay of a radioactive nucleus, Cesium. Figure 1: The Decay Modes of Cesium 137

b) Connect the oscilloscope across the potentiometer that is on the breadboard. Your instructor will draw the circuit diagram on the board.

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 22 Dec 2013

Radioactive Decay of 220 Rn and 232 Th Physics 2150 Experiment No. 10 University of Colorado

Cosmic Rays. Discovered in 1912 by Viktor Hess using electroscopes to measure ionization at altitudes via balloon

Louis Baum University of Michigan, REU Student Summer UM Nuclear Sciences Group

Appendix A2. Particle Accelerators and Detectors The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland on the Border of France.

Physical structure of matter. Duane-Hunt displacement law and Planck's quantum of action X-ray Physics. What you need:

BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES

PHYSICS LAB. Newton's Law. Date: GRADE: PHYSICS DEPARTMENT JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY

EXPERIMENT 11: NUCLEAR RADIATION

Experiment objectives: measure the ratio of Planck s constant to the electron charge h/e using the photoelectric effect.

Detecting Stopping Track Muons with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory

Examples for experiments that can be done at the T9 beam line

KM3NeT data analysis conventions

Visit for more fantastic resources. AQA. A Level. A Level Physics. Particles (Answers) Name: Total Marks: /30

I. Pre-Lab Introduction

Precision neutron flux measurement with a neutron beam monitor

Transcription:

Rice University Physics 332 LIFETIME OF THE MUON I. INTRODUCTION...2! II. MEAUREMENT PROCEDURE...3! III. ANALYI PROCEDURE...7! Revised July 2011

I. Introduction In this experiment you will measure the lifetime of an elementary particle, the muon, using instruments and techniques typical of high energy particle physics. Unlike the usual particle physics experiment, our source of muons is cosmic rays rather than an accelerator. The counting rate is therefore quite low and the experiment needs to run two to three days to obtain adequate statistics. Fortunately all that is required is patience, since the data acquisition system is designed for unattended operation. Cosmic rays have been extensively studied to learn about particle interactions and about astrophysical processes. Briefly, primary cosmic rays, consisting of energetic charged particles (one joule protons have been observed) and photons strike the upper atmosphere. Various secondary particles are produced, but only photons,!, muons, µ ±, and neutrinos, ", are sufficiently long-lived and penetrating to reach sea level in significant numbers. Very approximately, the total muon flux through a horizontal surface at sea level is 1.7 x 10 2 m -2 s -1, equally divided between positive and negative charges. The mean energy of the muons arriving at the surface is about 2 GeV, allowing the average muon to penetrate 2-3 m of concrete. Neutrinos do not interact at any reasonable rate, and photons do not decay, so the only particle decays we are likely to observe are due to muons. Essentially all free muons decay according to µ ±! e ± + " + " (1) with an exponential decay time of 2.197 µs in the rest frame. Negative muons can also vanish through capture by nuclei. For the low-z nuclei in our target the effect of µ - capture is to shorten the apparent lifetime of the negative muons by about 10%. If we can stop a group of muons and note how long they take to decay, we should obtain a lifetime in reasonable agreement with the accepted value. 2

II. Measurement procedures Figure 1 shows the counter geometry for the experiment. A cylinder of scintillator,, serves as a stopping target for µ ±. Paddles of scintillator, and, surround. Appropriate photomultipliers, not shown in the figure, detect events in the various counters. The signature of a stopped cosmic ray in is, assuming is above and that most cosmic rays come from above. When the stopped µ ± decays, the e ± will almost certainly stop within, so the signal of a decay is. The coincidence requirement will discriminate against non-cosmic sources of radiation, so random backgrounds from natural radioisotopes turn out not to be a problem. The required electronics is shown in Fig. 2. To acquire decay data we need to do the following: 1. Connect the scintillators to HV and verify operation; 2. Bring, into coincidence with, using a calibrated TAC; 3. Wire and verify the start/stop logic; 4. et up the TAC/PHA system for run conditions; 5. Accumulate events for 2-3 days; 6. Recalibrate TAC/PHA to check for drifts. Fig. 1 End view of counter geometry for lifetime measurement. Delay Discriminator A B V A B C 2/2 3/3 NEG IN DLY'D MARK Gate/Delay TART CONV. TOP TAC To PHA Fig. 2 Overall logic diagram for the experiment. 3

TART 30 ns CONV. TOP To PHA Delay TAC Discriminator Fig. 3 Electronics configuration for measuring arrival time relative to. Each of these procedures is detailed below. More information on NIM module operation is given in the PHY 331 Topical notes, while PHA operation is explained in the UC30 manual. 1. et one HV supply to negative polarity and connect cables from the front and rear to and. et the other HV supply to positive polarity and connect to. Turn on the HV and set to -1800 V for, and +1300 V for. Take the anode signals through the discriminators, as shown in Fig. 3, but do not connect the TAC yet. Check that the discriminator thresholds are about 30 mv (read as 300 mv at the test point). Verify that negative-going NIM pulses appear at the outputs of the discriminators, with the approximate widths shown in Fig. 3. The rates are low, so the scope display will be dim. 2. When an event in or occurs simultaneously with an event in the electrical pulse from will arrive after the pulse from or, as sketched in Fig. 4. To obtain a proper veto, we must delay the, pulses so that the pulse completely overlaps the pulse at the coincidence circuit. To do this, connect the discriminator outputs for and to the TART/TOP inputs of the TAC, using cables of the same length. et the TAC for 7V full range output, 50ns time scale, and P 30 ns 30 ns lag no added delay correct delay on P Fig. 4. Timing diagram for PMT pulses 4

Table I. Typical Parameters High voltage:, = -1800 V = +1300 Thresholds:,, = 30 mv Count Rates:, = 1900/100 s = 2200/100 s = 90/100 s (straight-through particles) = 200/100 s (stopping µ ±, TART) = 1800/100 s (decay µ ±, TOP) Good event rate to PHA! 1/minute. connect the low-impedance output to the UC 30 input. tart the UC 30 acquisition program, and configure it for direct-in PHA mode. A conversion gain of 256 channels will give sufficient time resolution. If the time scales are set correctly, you will get a clear peak in the TAC histogram corresponding to the distribution of lag times. Note the position and width of the peak and then calibrate the TAC time scale so that you can compute the average lag time. Use this to estimate the amount of delay needed to center the pulse within the pulse. It should be about 30 ns of delay. The same setting should work for, since the counters and cables are identical, but you could repeat the test with to be sure. 3. Connect the discriminator outputs to the inputs of the logic gates according to Fig. 2. To preserve the signal timing, all corresponding cables in the critical signal paths must be the same length. To check your work, use the counter to measure the rates at the logic outputs listed in Table I, setting the logic modules as required. Fig. 5 shows how to use the positive-input counter with fast negative NIM pulses. If there are significant discrepancies, say more than a factor of two, you should check with the instructor. When the rates are satisfactory set the logic modules to the data-taking configuration shown in Fig. 2. Be sure to record the count rates for later reference. fast NIM NEG. IN GATE PO. DEL OUT INPUT INT. Gate/Delay Counter Timer Fig. 5 Operating the visual counter from a NIM pulse. 5

4. We next set up and calibrate the TAC/PHA system for accumulating decay data. et the TAC for 7 V output and 10 µs full scale range. The gate/delay generator adds about 0.5 µs delay to the stop signal, so that small intervals do not fall into the non-linear portion of the TAC response. The actual setting is not critical so just set the pot to half-scale on the 1.1 µs range. To calibrate the time scale, connect the TART and TOP outputs of the time calibrator to the TAC in place of the outputs of the logic gates. (The calibrator stop signal should go through the gate/delay module just like the real signal.) Obtain a time calibration spectrum and perform a linear fit to the peak channel numbers vs time. 5. If the time calibration is satisfactory, replace the calibrator signals with the outputs of the logic gates. tart the acquisition and check that events with significant delay appear at about 1/minute. There will be a much higher rate of events near t = 0 due to inefficient vetoing, but these are not real decays. At least 48 hours of running will be needed to accumulate 2-3 thousand events to define the decay curve. It is prudent to save the accumulated data to a file once or twice a day, so that you do not lose everything to a power or equipment failure. To do this, halt the acquisition and save the data as a tab separated variable (TV) file. Continue the acquisition without erasing the memory. hould there be some sort of failure, you may be able to use the last saved file. 6. At the completion of the run save the final data set as a tab separated variable (TV) file for later analysis. Calibrate the TAC and measure the various rates again to check for any slow drifts in the apparatus. If all seems in order, proceed to the analysis. 6

III. Analysis procedures The data analysis consists of converting the channel number to time, and then fitting an exponential plus background to the counts vs time graph. A calculation of! 2 will serve to validate the fit. The decay time, with uncertainty, is the only fit parameter of physical significance. The following general comments may assist the use of the software you choose. A text editor will allow you to examine the TV file to separate extraneous headers and labels from actual data. Many analysis packages can read numerical data directly from a TV file, or you can use cut/paste to transfer the needed columns. As mentioned, early channels will be contaminated by instrumental artifacts. Fit only the clearly exponential portion of the decay. The raw histogram is spread over far too many bins, most of which will have very few counts. Adjacent bins should be combined to get 10-15 data points across the valid decay spectrum. 7