Soil changes during stockpiling and after reclamation at three Wyoming natural gas production areas

Similar documents
GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Jackson County 2014 Weather Data

Overview. Rock weathering Functions of soil Soil forming factors Soil properties

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

Plant Water Stress Frequency and Periodicity in Western North Dakota

Climatic and Ecological Conditions in the Klamath Basin of Southern Oregon and Northern California: Projections for the Future

Monday, Oct Field trip A1 & A2 signups: make sure you are where you think you should be

Introduction to Soil Science and Wetlands Kids at Wilderness Camp

January 25, Summary

PREDICTING SOIL SUCTION PROFILES USING PREVAILING WEATHER

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

Chapter-3 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION, CLIMATE AND SOIL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY SITE

Volume Composition of a Desirable Surface Soil

Climate Variability in South Asia

Average temperature ( F) World Climate Zones. very cold all year with permanent ice and snow. very cold winters, cold summers, and little rain or snow

A SUMMARY OF RAINFALL AT THE CARNARVON EXPERIMENT STATION,

Lecture 7: Introduction to Soil Formation and Classification

Climate Change and Water Supply Research. Drought Response Workshop October 8, 2013

Mechanical Weathering

Stream Discharge and the Water Budget

Jackson County 2019 Weather Data 68 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

2016 Meteorology Summary

Climatography of the United States No

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Climatography of the United States No

Nutrient Cycling in Land Vegetation and Soils

2003 Moisture Outlook

a) Name the features marked P,Q, and R b) Differentiate between a normal faulty and a reverse fault. 2. Use the diagram below to answer question (a)

Communicating Climate Change Consequences for Land Use

Physical Features of Monsoon Asia. 192 Unit 7 Teachers Curriculum Institute 60 N 130 E 140 E 150 E 60 E 50 N 160 E 40 N 30 N 150 E.

Climatography of the United States No

Mycorrhizal Fungi. Symbiotic relationship with plants -- form sheath around fine roots and extend hyphae into soil and sometimes into root cells

Three main areas of work:

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Colluvial debris: Rocks that have fallen down hills. Types of Parent Material

Soil Erosion Calculation using Remote Sensing and GIS in Río Grande de Arecibo Watershed, Puerto Rico

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

Analysis of Historical Pattern of Rainfall in the Western Region of Bangladesh

World Geography 3202 Practice Multiple Choice Unit 3 Ecosystems. Outcomes:

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Lecture 13 More Surface Reactions on Mineral Surfaces. & Intro to Soil Formation and Chemistry

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

Proposal to limit Namakan Lake to 1970 Upper Rule Curve for remainder of summer

A Post Processing Tool to Assess Sediment and Nutrient Source Allocations from SWAT Simulations

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Chemical Weathering and Soils

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Chemistry of Tiling and Crusting

Global Climates. Name Date

APPLICATIONS OF DOWNSCALING: HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES EXAMPLES

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Temperature and Precipitation. Next stage will depend on climate and parent materials

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climate also has a large influence on how local ecosystems have evolved and how we interact with them.

Impacts of climate change on flooding in the river Meuse

Water Year Day 2010

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

United States Climate

Disentangling Impacts of Climate & Land Use Changes on the Quantity & Quality of River Flows in Southern Ontario

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

DISTRIBUTION OF METALS IN PARTICLE SIZE FRACTIONS IN SOILS OF TWO FORESTED CATENAS (SMOLENSK MOSCOW UPLAND)

Presentation Overview. Southwestern Climate: Past, present and future. Global Energy Balance. What is climate?

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

Annual Average NYMEX Strip Comparison 7/03/2017

Climatography of the United States No

Minnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture. Today. 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date

Climatography of the United States No

DESCRIPTION OF A HYDROLOGIC DATASET. Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University and. Research Center. Wageningen, The Netherlands

Sampling, Storage and Pre-Treatment Techniques

How are adding integers and subtracting integers related? Work with a partner. Use integer counters to find 4 2. Remove 2 positive counters.

Weather and Climate of the Rogue Valley By Gregory V. Jones, Ph.D., Southern Oregon University

Long-term Water Quality Monitoring in Estero Bay

Climatography of the United States No

FORECAST-BASED OPERATIONS AT FOLSOM DAM AND LAKE

Supplementary Material: Crop & Pasture Science, 2013, 64(12),

Using the Web Soil Survey Resilience and Resistance Score Sheet Soils Report

Transcription:

Soil changes during stockpiling and after reclamation at three Wyoming natural gas production areas Jay Norton and Calvin Strom University of Wyoming 217 Joint Conference of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation Mine Drainage Task Force Appalachian Regional Reforestation Initiative Morgantown, West Virginia April 12, 217

Soil Function in aridisols and aridic alfisols A horizon: interface with atmosphere: OM accumulation and ELUVIATION; loss of clays, solutes; More OM, coarser texture, lower EC & ph than other horizons; Water infiltration & holding; nutrient cycling (microbes) Germination/establishment; B horizon: zone of accumulation of clays and solutes: ILLUVIATION Less OM, finer texture, higher EC & ph Water holding in finer texture

One size fits all Salvage & reclamation procedures

Pre disturbance: ABSTON FINE, SMECTITIC, FRIGID USTIC NATRARGIDS A E Bt Btn1 sandy loam clay Scraping depth Btn2 Bk Cr

After reclamation: ENTISOL Topsoil Clay Clay loam loam Subsoil

Loss of A horizon reduces already slim chances for germination & establishment Lifeless: little SOM to support microbial activity and nutrient cycling; Finer: inhibits water infiltration and facilitates evaporation; Drier: less OM and fine texture decrease plant-available water; Saline: EC > 4; osmotic potential and ion toxicity slow germination; Sodic: ESP > 15 disperses aggregates, exacerbating the above.

Pipelines + P&A + Active wells 29,683 Currently Producing Wells On File 121,626 Total Wells On File (DrillingEdge.com)

Great Divide and Green River Basins Objectives: determine short and longer-term effects of natural gas development and reclamation on soil quality across a precipitation gradient. Effects of topsoil depth on organic matter dynamics 11 inches Aridisols and Entisols formed in saline and sodic marine shales. 9 inches 7 inches

Soil Organic Matter Pools STRUCTURAL SOM METABOLIC SOM ACTIVE SOIL ACTIVE C SOM SLOW SOIL Slow C SOM PASSIVE SOM LOSSES: Harvest, CO 2 & N 2 O emissions, erosion etc. PLANT RESIDUE Active, or labile, SOM: Annual turnover Mineral N Mineralizable C& N dissolved organic C & N; Microbial C & N; light fraction C & N. Slow, or protected, SOM: Decades; Same as labile, but protected from mineralization within soil structure. Passive, or stabile, SOM: Centuries to millennia; Humus; Mineral-associated C & N;

Pinedale Anticline Elevation: 244 meters MATmax: 11 C MATmin: -6.6 C MAP: 276 mm Annual CV: 26.5% Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid Calcidic Haplustalfs Precipitation (mm) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 3 2 1-1 -2-3 Temperature (C)

Jonah Field Elevation: 214 meters MATmax: 11.9 C MATmin: -7.2 C MAP: 232 mm Ann CV: 27% Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid Calcidic Haplustalfs Precipitation (mm) 6 5 4 3 2 1 Total Precipitation Max. Temperature Min. Temperature Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 3 2 1-1 -2-3 Temperature (C)

Wamsutter/Great Divide Basin Elevation: 265 meters MATmax: 13.2 C MATmin: -2.6 C MAP: 18 mm Ann CV: 32% Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic Haplargids Precipitation (mm) 6 5 4 3 2 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 3 2 1-1 -2-3 Temperature (C)

Three new well pads sampled at each field starting in 29 (9 points composited) 1. Predisturbance; 2. Stockpile; 3. Respread; 4. 1 year later; 5. 7 years later.

Soil samples from -5, 5-2, and 2-3 cm Stockpiles: Three points sampled to 25 cm

Data Collection Vegetation cover Physical properties: bulk density, texture Chemical properties: ph, EC Biological properties (total and labile soil organic matter): Total soil organic carbon and nitrogen; Mineral nitrogen; Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen; Mineralizable organic carbon and nitrogen.

Jonah, 211 Jonah, 216

Anticline, 211 Anticline, 216

Study Period Precipitation Pinedale Jonah Wamsutter Precipitation (mm) 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Sep-Nov 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Sep-Nov 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Sep-Nov 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216

Mineralizable C in stockpiles, 29 Pinedale Jonah Wamsutter CO 2 -C mineralized (mg kg -1 ) CO 2 -C mineralized (mg kg -1 ) CO 2 -C mineralized (mg kg -1 ) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 2 4 6 8 5 May June 5 5 Depth (cm) 1 15 August Depth (cm) 1 15 Depth (cm) 1 15 2 2 2 25 25 25

Reclaimed: Soil texture Anticline Jonah Wamsutter Clay Content (%) 1 2 3 Clay Content (%) 1 2 3 Clay Content (%) 1 2 3 5 5 5 1 1 1 Depth (cm) 15 2 15 2 15 2 25 25 25 3 3 3 35 35 35 Reclaimed Undisturbed Undisturbed

Reclaimed: Soil texture Anticline Jonah Wamsutter Clay Content (%) 1 2 3 Clay Content (%) 1 2 3 Clay Content (%) 1 2 3 5 5 5 1 1 1 Depth (cm) 15 2 15 2 15 2 25 25 25 3 3 3 35 35 35 Reclaimed Undisturbed

Disturbance Effects 1. Undisturbed: high labile SOM concentrations, low mineral N concentrations (low net mineralization); 2. Pulse of labile and mineral nutrients after disturbance truncated in cold storage in stockpile; 3. Pulse of mineralization at expense of PMC and N; 4. Loss of mineral N, labile OM begins to rebound. PMN and Mineral N (mg kg -1 ) 3 25 2 15 1 5 Jonah Mineral N PMN PMC 3 25 2 15 1 5 PMC (mg kg -1 ) Predisturbance Stockpiled Reclaimed Reclaimed 1 yr -3 cm weighted averages

PMN and Mineral N (mg kg -1 ) 6 5 4 3 2 1 Anticline 6 5 4 3 2 1 PMC (mg kg -1 ) PMN and Mineral N (mg kg -1 ) 3 25 2 15 1 5 Jonah Mineral N PMN PMC 3 25 2 15 1 5 PMC (mg kg -1 ) Predisturbance Stockpiled Reclaimed Reclaimed 1 yr Predisturbance Stockpiled Reclaimed Reclaimed 1 yr Disturbance Effects -3 cm weighted averages PMN and Mineral N (mg kg -1 ) 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Wamsutter 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 PMC (mg kg -1 ) Anticline: complicated by stockpile being moved at least twice. Predisturbance Stockpiled Reclaimed Reclaimed 1 yr

PMC and N (mg kg -1 ) 5 4 3 2 1 Loss of labile C and N Anticline 5 25 4 3 2 1 PMC and N (mg kg -1 ) 2 15 1 5 Jonah 25 2 15 1 5 PMC and N (mg kg -1 ) 25 2 15 1 5 Wamsutter 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Mineral Nitrogen (mg kg -1 ) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 All Well Fields

Soil Organic Carbon (%) 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5 Anticline.25.2.15.1.5 Soil Organic Carbon (%) 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5 Jonah.5.4.3.2.1.. 2.5.25 Recovery of SOM Change: predisturbance to seven years after reclamation. TOC TN % change Anticline 72 88 Jonah -45-197 Wamsutter 3.7-1.7 Soil Organic Carbon (%) 2. 1.5 1..5. Wamsutter.2.15.1.5

Conclusions Stockpiles in semiarid region may not be affected by depth, at least in the short-term; What about age? Compared with degraded reference sites, reclaimed sites seem to recover or exceed original SOM levels within seven years; Possibly due to increased herbaceous vegetation Potentially mineralizable carbon recovers more slowly; Possibly due to loss of soil structure, which protects labile SOM from mineralization, and continued accelerated mineralization, lack of woody species Interest in reclamation research is as variable as annual rainfall.

Thanks to Calvin Strom Cally Driessen Amber Mason Jennifer Faulkner Leann Naughton Luke Driessen Kristi Bear Todd Loubsky K.C. Harvey, Inc. Gary Austen, BP America Pete Guernsey, QEP Resources Ralph Swift, Encana Exploration UW School of Energy Resources Wyoming Reclamation & Restoration Center