Rock Scaling Recommendations Logan Creek Drive Cut Slope

Similar documents
3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment

SEISMIC REFRACTION SURVEY RIPPABILITY STUDY

August 10, 2007 File:

Construction Exits Vibration grids

U-Shaped Sediment Traps

Resolution Number: (2) Resolution Title: Snow Policy Date Signed: 11/26/12. DAVIS COUNTY Snow Policy Resolution

US82 ROCKFALL MITIGATION PROJECT May, BY Mohammed Ghweir Engineering Geologist Geotechnical Design Section New Mexico DOT

Rock & Aggregate Drop Inlet Protection

B805 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES - OPSS 805

Construction Exits Rock pads

Dust Storms in Arizona: The Challenge to Ensure Motorist Safety Jennifer Toth, P.E. Deputy Director for Transportation

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

IOWA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 22 IOWA COUNTY SNOW & ICE POLICY

DELAWARE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 3

Geotechnical Risks and Slope Management Systems: An FHWA Perspective

Geotechnical Risks and Management Systems: An FHWA Perspective

Oktoberforum 2005: Case Histories in Engineering Geology and Geotechnical Engineering,, 4 th Oct. 2005, Petaling Jaya

Coarse Sediment Traps

Early Exploration Permit Activity Information

CEDAR COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6

Canadian Consulting Engineering Awards 2017 Southern Alberta Rock Slope Stabilization & Other Work Amec Foster Wheeler

January 16, Re: Soo Line Dump Site 2018 Annual Soil Cover Inspection. Dear Mr. Nichols:


POTENTIAL USE OF GROUND PENETRATING RADAR IN HIGHWAY ROCK CUT STABILITY Norbert H. Maerz* and Wooyoung Kim^ ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

1. Major streets, Central Business District (CBD) and school bus routes. 2. Local streets 3. Downtown parking lots

CHAPTER FIVE 5.0 STABILITY OF CUT SLOPES IN THE STUDY AREA. them limited by a thick canopy of vegetation and steep slope angles.

Wells Truck Climbing Lane Elko County

COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

Preliminary Geotechnical Review, Angels Crest Rock Fall, Stawamus Chief, Squamish, BC

General. High Winds. High winds are a common hazard in the UAE.

SNOW REMOVAL POLICY ITASCA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

February 18, 2003 File: NORTH CENTRAL REGION LANDSLIDE ASSESSMENT HWY 43:16 WHITECOURT EAST HILL (NC1) 2002 ANNUAL INSPECTION REPORT

Dunn County Snow Removal Policy

GOAL 7 AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND HAZARDS. To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards.

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

DRAFT. PRELIMINARY LANDSLIDE MODELING for KRAMER AVENUE LANDSLIDE SITKA, ALASKA. Prepared for: Andrew Friske 210 Kramer Ave. Sitka, Alaska 99835

Field Trip Workbook G200 Field Studies Sec 001 (Mt St. Helens north) Fall, 2018 Professor in charge: Alex Ruzicka TA : Secana Goudy

3/8/17. #20 - Landslides: Mitigation and Case Histories. Questions for Thought. Questions for Thought

Town of Windsor. Department of Public Works

City of Camrose Winter Road Maintenance Policy

ADDENDA #1 CONTRACT # C May 3, 2013 Page 1 of 1

CUSTER COUNTY SNOW REMOVAL PROCEDURES

Snow Removal Policy WARREN COUNTY ENGINEER S OFFICE (WCEO) WARREN COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. October 16, 2014

Physics 1A, Summer 2011, Summer Session 1 Quiz 3, Version A 1

Project (Project No. US-CA-62-2) Maintenance Inspection and Reports (Subtask 14.1) Inspection Report No.2

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

2. Initial Summary of Preliminary Expert Opinion of Converse and Psomas Reports

Snow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy

BOONE COUNTY Snow Removal Program and Policy SECTION 1, INTRODUCTION:

1. PROJECT BACKGROUND. July 18, Alberta Infrastructure & Transportation Central Region #401, Street Red Deer, Alberta T4N 6K8

H IG HWAY WINTER OPERATIONS SNOW REMOVAL AND ICE CONTROL POLICY. Revised January 4, 2016

INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS ATV Plow Blade Part Number: (50 ), (54 ), or (60 ) Application: All Terrain Vehicles

ROCK EXCAVATION (GRADING) OPSS 206 INDEX

Woodford County Erosion Prevention Plan and Permit. Application #

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR WEEK OF February 4 8, 2008

1 PROJECT BACKGROUND. August 14, Alberta Transportation Central Region #401, Street Red Deer, Alberta T4N 6K8

AASHTO Extreme Weather Events Symposium Vermont s Road and Rivers - Managing for the Future

SNOWPLOWING/ICE CONTROL POLICY

Town of Oconomowoc Snow & Ice Control Policy


FOR PROJECTS INITIATED AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2008 ITEM 716 EMBANKMENT EARTH OUTLET SEDIMENT TRAP

Active Traffic & Safety Management System for Interstate 77 in Virginia. Chris McDonald, PE VDOT Southwest Regional Operations Director

Minnesota Local Road Research Board Local Operational Research Assistance Program (OPERA)

Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District 109 St. Joseph Street, Mobile, Alabama Prepared by:

Wyoming State Operations Center

CITY OF EAST PEORIA SNOW AND ICE CONTROL PROGRAM INTRODUCTION

The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer

POLICY MANUAL. Hamlets/Residential named hamlets within the County of Grande Prairie whose roads are hard surfaced.

MANUAL FOR ROCKFALL INVENTORY PREPARED BY:

Tornadoes. Be able to define what a tornado is. Be able to list several facts about tornadoes.

October 26, Ms. Aimee Zack Canadian Pacific 120 S. Sixth Street Suite 900 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

Advanced Geologic Exploration, Inc.

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE ROAD, WEATHER AND INCIDENT CONDITIONS 4/22/2019 4:20:05 AM

ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF THE STANLEY MINE ADVENTURE PARK AREA CLEAR CREEK COUNTY, COLORADO. Prepared for:

[1] Performance of the sediment trap depends on the type of outlet structure and the settling pond surface area.

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213

WORK SESSION AGENDA COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE APRIL 1, 2019 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COUNCIL MEETING

STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT

AP Physics 1 Work Energy and Power Practice Test Name

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GASTON ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i) (xii)

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

Chapter 5 THE DEVELOPMENT OF VOLCANIC EMERGENCY PLANS. 5.1 Introduction

Section 3. Slopes and Landscapes. What Do You See? Think About It. Investigate. Learning Outcomes

Sediment Control Practices. John Mathews Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Resources

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works

Mitigation of Gypsum Mine Voids Under SR-2 in Ottawa County, Ohio

Updating the Urban Boundary and Functional Classification of New Jersey Roadways using 2010 Census data

Yoshinori KAWAMURA, Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd.

Central Queensland Coal Project Appendix 4b Geotechnical Assessment. Environmental Impact Statement

Tom Blackman Project Lead. Mékell Mikell Communications Representative

3.18 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Landslide Mitigation (BYUI)

CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations.

Appendix M Preliminary Geotechnical Report, SR 32 Widening Project Study Report

Glacial Geology of Moose Point State Park, ME

OXFORD HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION EMERGENCY EVACUATION PLAN

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

Transcription:

Rock Scaling Recommendations Logan Creek Drive Cut Slope US 50, Milepost DO 8.47 to DO 8.61 Douglas County, Nevada January 2008 MATERIALS DIVISION

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS DIVISION GEOTECHNICAL SECTION GEOTECHNICAL REPORT ROCK SCALING RECOMMENDATIONS LOGAN CREEK DRIVE CUT SLOPE January 2008 DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEVADA Prepared by: Jeffrey A. Palmer, Ph.D., P.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Reviewed by: Parviz Noori, P.E. Assistant Chief Materials Engineer - Geotechnical Approved by: Dean Weitzel, P.E. Chief Materials Engineer

Project Overview The project consists of scaling loose rocks from a single slope above the roadway on US 50. Anchoring rocks or using rockfall meshes and fences are not being considered at this time. All scaled rocks and debris are to be removed from the project site. NDOT Maintenance forces will clean the bottom of the slope to remove any existing debris prior to work. Payment quantities are expected to be for scaled rock only and in-place soil on the slope should remain on the slope during the scaling process. Scaling work is to be done in a manner that keeps future erosion on the slope to a minimum. The slope is to be scaled prior to an overlay project planned to start in the spring or summer of 2008. The scaling project is planned to take approximately two weeks to scale plus one week to mobilize equipment and personnel to the site. The Rockfall Hazard Rating System (RHRS) study and report prepared by the University of Nevada (1993) identified this slope as Slope Number 13. This slope received a score of 305 and was the seventh from the top on the list of 62 slopes rated and ranked by Overall Detailed Rating Scores, where the slope at the top of the list has the greatest rockfall hazard potential. The slope is approximately forty feet high at its peak, consisting of granodiorite bedrock having a geologic character that is mainly erosional. The two factors that contributed the most to the RHRS score were the Average Vehicle Risk (based on the slope length and traffic speed limit) and Site Distance (based on reduced visibility due to the existence of a horizontal curve of the road at this location). The report recommends mitigating the slope by scaling mostly on the top and ends of the slope. The majority of the scaling work to be accomplished is at the crest of the slope where a soil cover layer has been exposed due to construction of the cut slope. This can be seen in the photos in this report. There are many rocks within the soil cover layer that are eroding out of the bedrock below the soil cover layer. Most of the slope face below this soil cover layer is bedrock and does not need scaling. 1

Site Location The slope is located just south of Logan Creek Drive on US 50 near Lake Tahoe. It is located from milepost DO 8.47 to DO 8.61 in Douglas County, Nevada on the east side of the road. The road at this location has four lanes, two northbound and two southbound. A pullout area exists on the west side of the road for about one-third of the slope length, directly across from the center of the slope. Recommendations Photos 4 through 8 show areas with circles around groups of rocks recommended for scaling. Some rocks that are circled in the photos may stay in place if determined during scaling attempts that they are firmly attached to bedrock. Other rocks on the slope that are not circled might need scaling, which have to be determined during construction and approved by the NDOT Engineer prior to scaling. There is a house that was built on top of rocks on the backside of the hill that may be impacted if the large rocks on the top of the hill above the slope are excessively disturbed. Caution must be exercised to not disturb the large rocks on top of the hill above the crest of the slope. Rocks scaled from the slope might possibly travel across the road and down the slope on the west side of the road. Several houses are located directly below the highway that could potentially be damaged if a rock were to travel over the road, down the west side and impact the house. A temporary moveable barrier must be placed on or at the edge of the roadway to control moving rocks. The moveable barrier must be of sufficient height and strength to capture nearly all material coming off the slope. Typical barriers used for roadway are not adequate for this application. Placing the moveable barrier in the center of the road would allow for quick cleanup of material from the road on the south bound side after scaling. Stopping traffic will only be allowed for a limited period of time, as specified in the Special Provisions for this project. The barrier allows traffic to continue quickly by keeping rocks off of the south bound travel lanes. 2

Rock splitting techniques should be expected for use, however no blasting, noticeably loud techniques or techniques that cause rocks to be thrown in the air are allowed. All methods of work shall be reviewed and accepted by the Engineer prior to use. The approximate volume of material expected to be generated by scaling is 400 cubic yards. The work will require specialized equipment and manpower including scalers in harnesses hanging from ropes attached to the top of the slope face (repelling), use of a man lift bucket to allow scalers to reach the slope face or other means that can place scalers directly on the slope face. Scaling may be performed by using hand tools such as power tools (hydraulic or other types of rock splitters approved by the Engineer, jackhammers, etc.), pulling cables, crowbars, prybars, jacks and shovels. Excavation using heavy equipment may be used, only if necessary, for slope sections where removing rocks, such as a boulder or overhanging bedrock outcrop, using hand scaling is not practical. Scraping the slope face or dragging heavy objects on the slope face is not allowed. Slope scaling should start at the top of the slope and proceed down slope while removing rocks. All material on the slope face that is loose, hanging or creating a dangerous condition will need to be removed or stabilized during or after completion of that section of slope. References 1. Application of the rockfall Hazard Rating System To the Rock Slopes Adjacent to US 50 and State Route 28 On the East Side of Lake Tahoe, Nevada (November 18, 1993), by Robert Flatland, Advisor Robert J. Watters, University of Nevada, Reno. 2. Rockfall Hazard Rating System Participant Manual, Publication No. FHWA SA-93-057, November 1993, National Highway Institute. 3

Photos 1 and 2. US 50 slope just south of Logan Creek Drive. 4

Photos 3 and 4. North end of slope showing recommended rocks to be removed. 5

Photos 5 and 6. Center of slope showing recommended rocks to be removed. 6

Photos 7 and 8. South end of slope showing recommended rocks to be removed. 7