JosC Tenorio Mejia', Franco D'Amore' and Jane Y. Gerardo3

Similar documents
Geochemical Characteristics of Reservoir Fluid from NW-Sabalan Geothermal Field, Iran

Geochemical monitoring of the response ofgeothermal reservoirs to production load examples from Krafla, Iceland

Enhancement of Silica-Enthalpy Mixing Model to Predict Enthalpy of Geothermal Reservoir

The Initial-State Geochemistry as a Baseline for Geochemical Monitoring at Ulubelu Geothermal Field, Indonesia

CHEMICAL GEOTHERMOMETERS FOR GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION

Geochemical Modelling of Low-Temperature Geothermal Fields from Bihor County, Romania

Fluid Geochemistry at the Nir Geothermal Field, Nw-Iran

Geochemical Monitoring of the Lakes District Area

2. California Energy Company, Inc. 3. Thermochem, Inc.

FLUID-MINERAL EQUILIBRIA AND SUBSURFACE TEMPERATURE EVALUATION OF SELECTED HOT SPRINGS, JIANGXI PROVINCE, SE-CHINA

Update on the Stable Isotope Geochemistry of the Leyte Geothermal Production Field

Geothermometer, Geoindicator and Isotope Monitoring in Lahendong Wells during

GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ACID FLUIDS IN MT PINATUBO, PHILIPPINES

HYDROTHERMAL MODEL OF THE MOMOTOMBO GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM, NICARAGUA

Effective geochemical methods for identifying geothermal systems in the western branch of the EARS

GEOCHEMICAL INTERPRETATION OF THERMAL FLUID DISCHARGE FROM WELLS AND SPRINGS IN BERLÍN GEOTHERMAL FIELD, EL SALVADOR

GEOCHEMISTRY OF RWENZORI HOT SPRINGS. Vincent Kato Department of Geological Survey and Mines, Entebbe, Uganda

Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University

SURFACE EXPLORATION AND MONITORING OF GEOTHERMAL ACTIVITY IN THE KVERKFJÖLL GEOTHERMAL AREA, CENTRAL ICELAND

GEOCHEMICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE MASAYA-GRANADA-NANDAIME CHEMICAL DATA, NICARAGUA

THE CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GEOTHERMAL FLUIDS IN JIAODONG PENINSULA, SHANDONG, CHINA

THE FLUID CHARACTERISTICS OF THREE EXPLORATION WELLS DRILLED AT OLKARIA-DOMES FIELD, KENYA

THE IMPLICATION OF 34 S AND 18 O ISOTOPE SYSTEMATICS ON THE SULFUR CYCLE IN MAHANAGDONG HYDROTHERMAL SYSTEM (PHILIPPINESS)

Carbonates and Silica Scaling Model Applied to Hot Water Pipes for Sanitary Use at Hotel Río Perlas, Costa Rica

Structural Controls on the Chemistry and Output of the Wells in the Olkaria Geothermal Field, Kenya

Kizito Maloba Opondo. Kenya Electricity Generating Company

Japan Engineering Consultants, Inc., Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization,Tokyo, Japan

Isotope and Gas Geochemistry of Dieng Geothermal Field, Indonesia

Heat (& Mass) Transfer. conceptual models of heat transfer. large scale controls on fluid movement. distribution of vapor-saturated conditions

Geochemical and Hydrological Assessment of Thermal Features in the Vicinity of the Champagne Pool in the Waiotapu Geothermal System

A New Combinational Terminology for Geothermal Systems

MULTICOMPONENT EQUILIBRIUM MODELS FOR TESTING GEOTHERMOMETRY APPROACHES

NUMERICAL MODELING STUDY OF SIBAYAK GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR, NORTH SUMATRA, INDONESIA

INTERPRETATION OF INTERFERENCE EFFECTS IN THREE PRODUCTION WELLS IN THE KAWERAU GEOTHERMAL FIELD, NEW ZEALAND. Lynell Stevens and Kevin J Koorey

Preliminary Assessment of the Ohinewai Low Enthalpy Geothermal System, New Zealand

GAS EQUILIBRIA CONTROLLING H 2 S IN DIFFERENT PHILIPPINE GEOTHERMAL FIELDS

DEVIATIONS IN SILICA GEOTHERMOMETRY AT WAIRAKEI. Brian Lovelock

- the gaslateam ratio and 6l80 have decreased

GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE COMOROS AND RESULTS OF GEOTHERMAL SURFACE EXPLORATION

MODELING OF FORMATION OF ACID WATER DISCHARGED FROM HIGH TEMPERATURE GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR

Franco D'Amore,Claudio Calore and Romano Celati. Istituto Internazionale per le Ricerche Geotermiche (CNR) Via del Buongusto 1, Pisa, Italy

ISOTOPE HYDROLOGY STUDIES OF KATWE, BURANGA AND KIBIRO GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS, UGANDA

A New Method of Evaluation of Chemical Geothermometers for Calculating Reservoir Temperatures from Thermal Springs in Nevada

Geochemistry and Isotope Study of Discharged Geothermal Fluids, NW Sabalan Geothermal Field, NW Iran

GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE TENDAHO GEOTHERMAL FIELD, ETHIOPIA

Anna Yushantarti Center For Mineral, Coal, and Geothermal Resources, MEMR Jl Soekarno Hatta 444, Bandung, Indonesia

South Island Barrier Volcano Namarunu. Emuruangogolak. Kilimanjaro

EFECTS OF COLD WATER RECHARGE ON DOWNHOLE TEMPERATURE WELLS OF CERRO PRIETO UNO AREA IN CERRO PRIETO FIELD MEXICO

Prediction of Calcite Scaling at the Oguni Geothermal Field, Japan: Chemical Modeling Approach

Active Faults and Geothermal Potential in Vietnam: a Case Study in Uva Area, Dien Bien Phu Basin, Along Dien Bien -Lai Chau Fault

AN EVALUATION OF THE DEEP RESERVOIR CONDITIONS OF THE BACON-MANIT0 GEOTHERMAL FIELD, PHILIPPINES USING WELL GAS CHEMISTRY

THE GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL OF BILIRAN ISLAND, PHILIPPINES

Study on Dālaki Geothermal Resource in Bushehr Province, in the North of Persian Gulf

ISOTOPE GEOCHEMISTRY OF GEOTHERMAL WATERS IN NORTHERN NORTH CHINA BASIN: IMPLICATIONS ON DEEP FLUID MIGRATION

Quantification of the 3D thermal anomaly in the orogenic geothermal system at Grimsel Pass

Various Geoscientific Investigations of Low-Enthalpy Geothermal Sites in the United Arab Emirates

Geochemical Modeling of Acidic Geothermal Fluids using SOLVEQ and CHIM-xpt

Status of geothermal energy exploration at Buranga geothermal prospect, Western Uganda

RECHARGE ELEVATION OF HOT SPRING STUDY IN THE MT

-344- LIQUID-DOMINATED GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIRS. Lewis Semprini and Paul Kruger Civil Engineering Department Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305

Fluid Chemistry of Menengai Geothermal Wells, Kenya

Magmatic Rifting and Active Volcanism Conference 2012, January 11-13, Addis Ababa.

Geophysical Surveys of The Geothermal System of The Lakes District Rift, Ethiopia

SUBSURFACE HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION AT THE ULUBELU GEOTHERMAL FIELD, LAMPUNG, SOUTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA. Suharno 1, 2 and PRL Browne 2

Yellowstone National Park: Regional Groundwater Dynamics in High-Temperature Geothermal Areas

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

FLUID STRATIGRAPHY OF THE COSO GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR

Systematics of Rare Alkalis and Halogens in the High-Temperature Mahanagdong Geothermal Field, Leyte, Philippines

APPLICATION OF GEOCHEMICAL METHODS IN GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION. Halldór Ármannsson November 2007

GEOCHEMICAL INTERPRETATION OF THERMAL WATER AND BOREHOLE WATER FROM THE ASAL-GHOUBBET REGION, DJIBOUTI

HIGH TEMPERATURE HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION IN ACTIVE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS A CASE STUDY OF OLKARIA DOMES

ASSESSMENT OF GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES AT THE AL-LITH AREA, KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA

Geochemical Modeling of Acid Fluids in Los Humeros Geothermal Field, Mexico

DEPRESSURIZATION AS A STRATEGY FOR MINING ORE BODIES WITHIN AN ACTIVE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM

Bog Hot Valley. (updated 2012)

CASE HISTORY OF LOS AZUFRES CONCEPTUAL MODELLING IN A MEXICAN GEOTHERMAL FIELD

Study on the Geochemistry of Potential High Temperature Geothermal Resources in Taxkorgan, Xinjiang, China

THE ZUNIL-II GEOTHERMAL FIELD, GUATEMALA, CENTRAL AMERICA

David I. Norman and Joseph N. Moore

Takigami geothermal system, northeastern Kyushu, Japan

THREE DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL MODELING OF MINDANAO GEOTHERMAL PRODUCTION FIELD, PHILIPPINES

MODELING AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TWO-PHASE GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR AT OGIRI, KYUSHU, JAPAN

GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE CONCEPTUAL MODELS USING SURFACE EXPLORATION DATA

Geothermal Potential Assessment in Northern Rwanda

RESPONSE OF WAIRAKEI GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR TO 40 YEARS OF PRODUCTION

CALORIMETRY AND HYDROTHERMAL ERUPTIONS, WAIMANGU HYDROTHERMAL FIELD,

HOT SPRING MONITORING AT LASSEN VOLCANIC NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Michael L. Sorey. U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DEEPENED WELLS 420DA AND 517DA IN THE LEYTE GEOTHERMAL PRODUCTION FIELD, PHILIPPINES

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

Ann Moulding and Tom Brikowski University of Texas at Dallas, Department of Geosciences

A Comparative Study on the Energy Potential of Geothermal Fields. along the Qinghai-Tibet Railway in China

CO-EXISTING VOLCANISM AND HYDROTHERMAL ACTIVITY AT KELIMUTU, FLORES ISLAND, EASTERN INDONESIA

BULLS-EYE! - SIMPLE RESISTIVITY IMAGING TO RELIABLY LOCATE THE GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR

Geothermal Exploration in Eritrea

GEOTHERMAL ENERGY POTENTIAL FOR LONGONOT PROSPECT, KENYA. By Mariita N. O. Kenya Electricity Generating Company

PROCEEDINGS, Twenty-Fifth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, January 24-26, 2000 SGP-TR-165

INTERPRETATION OF GEOCHEMICAL WELL TEST DATA FOR WELLS OW-903B, OW-904B AND OW-909 OLKARIA DOMES, KENYA

Lecture 5. Introduction to Stable Isotopes

INTERPRETATION OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GEOTHERMAL FLUID FROM THE GEOTHERMAL FIELD OF BARANSKY VOLCANO, ITURUP ISLAND, RUSSIA

DIRECT USE RESERVOIR MODELS HOW WE THINK THEY WORK. Gene Culver, Associate Director

Transcription:

PROCEEDINGS. Twenty-Second Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, January 27-29, 1997 SGP-TR-155 UNDERSTANDING THE HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES OF THE BERLIN GEOTHERMAL FIELD, EL SALVADOR, BASED ON STABLE ISOTOPE DATA JosC Tenorio Mejia', Franco D'Amore' and Jane Y. Gerardo3 1 Comisi6n Ejecutiva HidroelCctrica del Rio Lempa, C. E. L., El Salvador 2 International Institute for Geothermal Researches, CNR, Pisa, Italia 3 Isotope Hydrology, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria ABSTRACT The isotopic investigation carried out in the Berlin geothermal field, indicates that the upflowing geothermal fluid represented by 6"O and F2H of -3.4 %O and -43 %O was intersected by well TR-5. The relationship between 6"O and C1 indicates that steam separates at various proportions and temperature as the fluid ascends to the surface. The residual liquid characterized by heavier isotope contents are tapped by wells TR-9, 2 and 3. The steam is postulated to find its way into the numerous fumaroles common in the Berlin geothermal field. TR-5 as well as the rest of the other wells, are recharged by meteoric waters likely with F " and F2H of -7 %O and -49 %o, respectively, which remains to be validated by additional isotopic measurements from meteoric and geothermal waters. A mixing line connects the meteoric end member and the geothermal waters at a slope which indicates that the parent source water is heavier in stable isotopes, likely andesitic in composition. overlay a Tertiary volcanic basement. The geothermal reservoir is located within a layer of andesitic to andesitic basaltic lavas and tuffs belonging to the Tertiary basement. The permeability is controlled mainly by a fault system trending NW-SE. INTRODUCTION The Berlin geothermal field is located at an elevation between 6 and 9 masl (figure 1) in the northern slope of the Berlin-Tecapa volcanic complex, approximately 112 km ESE of San Salvador, El Salvador. The geothermal system is associated with the activity of the Berlin volcano, which rises to an elevation of 13 masl. It is located witlun a 2 km wide graben enclosing the active volcanic axis of Central America. In the late Pleistocene, the caldera collapsed due to an explosive eruption from a stratovolcano which Fig.1. Location of Berlin geothermal field Six deep wells drilled between 19718-1981, out of which four turned out to be good producers, proved the existence of a geothermal system of commercial interest. The geosciantific surveys carried out in the area, showed the presence of a water dominated geothermal reservoir at 2 in deep, having a temperature in the range of 28-35 OC, reservoir chloride Concentration from 497

3-62 mg/kg, and enthalpy from 88-1289 J/g (table 1). The temperature contours indicate a flow from well TR-5 from South to North (figure 2). CI T meas ("C) Ysep 21 32 35 39 3 1289 I9 Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the drilled wells in Berlin geothermal field 281 5, 288 \ J TR-14 A 25 5 75 1M Fig. 3. Relative C1-S4-HC3 content in Berlin geothermal area HC3 287 51 3 2871 9 PEEL-? NalIWO 288 51 \ I 265bi 551 5 552 5525 553 5535 W O O 554 5 Lon@tude Fig. 2. Map contours of the measured temperature for the wellfield w1 GEOCHEMISTRY Figure 3 shows the triangular diagram of Cl-S4- HC3 of the different waters characterizing the Berlin geothermal system. Local springs cluster in the bicarbonate corner, indicating their superficial origin. The deep geothermal fluid is manifested on the surface by spring F-2 whose composition suggests a mixing between water of deep geothermal origin with water of volcanic origin. The geothermal wells on one hand occupy the chloride corner indicating their equilibrium with the surrounding rocks. The Na-K-Mg diagram (Giggenbach, 1988), showed in figure 4, further indicates this equilibrium conditions, showing that all the geothemal waters of the wells are mature and equilibrated with rock at about 32 "C. Fig. 4. Evaluation of the Na-K-Mg geothermometer, Berlin geotherrmal area The chloride-enthalpy diagram (figure 5) indicates the main processes occurring in the geothermal system. It is postulated that the fluid feeding the well TR-5 is the most representative of the deep system. The fluids of wells TR-2 and TR-9 are produced by boiling consequently increasing the chloride contents and decreasing the temperature. Well TR-3, however, could be explained by boiling of a deep geothermal fluid with a chloride content and an enthalpy of approximately 44 mg/kg and 17 J/g, respectively, which when boiled-off increased chloride levels and decreased the enthalpy. Several geothermometers were used to calculate temperature values, using chemical data from Table 2. 498

(WELL IDATE Na IK ICa IMg ILi IC1 SO4 IHC3 ISI2 1B mag TR- 1 1986 1711 154.4 144.93 3143 54.2 28.137 22.8 64.3 TR-2 JUI-2-95 336 68 74.1.666 11.36 5159 3.88 9. 6.4 99.6 TR-3 1991 3663 624 148.195 629 8.58 2.7 578.5 116 TR-4* Apr-27-93 165 246 27.5.58 2867 89.7 37.2 428 82 TR-5 May-12-95 1623 359.9 18.3.854 2994 6.588 3.7 73.8 72.6 -TR-9 Ju-22-95 2422 553 49.168 1.36 4274 3.85 26.7 726.6 86.8 Table 2. Chemical composition for geothermal wells in Berlin geothermal field at reservoir conditions during exploitation ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION OF THE FLU IDS 1 2 MOO 4 sow BOW 7 8 mglkg of chloride Fig. 5. Chloride-enthalpy diagram, showing the parent water and the mixing, boiling and cooling lines The NaKCa with Mg correction geothermometer (Giggenbach, 1988), reflects the temperatures closest to the measured values (Table 3). TR-3 296 276 TR-4 TR-5 TR-9 32 296 292 34 34 295 3 29 29 351 Note:_TN,-K, Fournier (1979a), TNa-K-Ca, Fournier and Truesdell (1973), Tqa. Amorsson (1985), TK. Ms, Giggenbach ( 1988) Selected hot and cold springs, fumaroles and geothermal wells were, analyzed for chemical and isotopic (", 'H, 3H) composition to obtain a better understanding of the hydrological processes in the Berlin geothermal system, as part of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Assintence Project, ELS/8/5, to El Salvador. The chemical analyses of waters (see table 2) were done by the CEL Chemical Laboratory and the water isotopic analyses were carried out in the isotope Hydrolagy Laboratory of the IAEA, Vienna, Austria (table 4). The geothermal waters from the geothermal wells were collected by a mini Webre separator. All chemical data are reported at reservoir conditions, calculated by a computer code. The isotopic data was calculated to reservoir conditions based on the following: (Henley, et. al., 1984) Hr = yh, + (1-y) HI : enthalpy balance. 6 = y 6, + (1-y)6, io3 Ina 6, =61 -io3 In a : isotope balance. :isotopic fractionation factor :isotope composition at reservoir condition where Hr is the enthalpy at reservoir condition (r), HI is the enthalpy in the liquid (1) and vapor phase (v); y is the steam fraction; S,, 61 and 6, are the isotopic compositions in the reservoir, liquid and vapor after separation, respectively. 499

SAMPLE F-79 L.A. F-84 F- 1 F-5 F-16 F-83 F-2 P-4 BERLIN* C.GEOT.* M.UMA~~A* TR-2 TR- 3 TR-5 TR- 9 DATE Juri-1 3-95 Jun-13-95 Juri-1 3-95 Jw-14-95 Jun-14-95 Jw-9-9 5 Jw-14-95 Ju-1 5-95 Ju~-15-95 Jd- 19-95 Jul-26-9 5 Jul-26-95 Juri-2-95 1991 May-12-95 Measured values Reservoir condition 18 is O%o &H%o I 6 18 2 %o K H%o -6.68-1.42-7.26-7. -7.3-7.16 -.98-6.17-7.6-5.68-8. -8.98-2.35-5.8 (v) -3.5-2.62-45.3-12.2-61.1-49.9-48.5-49. -25.8-42.6-47.4-33.6-56.7-65.2-42.8-41.1 (v) -43.1-4.8-2.64-2.6-3.36-2.99-43.9-41.1-43.41-41.17 Clres rnpk 4.33 5.53 7.94 7.64 5.78 22.3 1.5 48 89.16 5159 629 2994 4274 Jw-22-95 (*) = Rainfall samples (v) = steam sample Table 4. Isotopic composition for waters samples (shallow and deep water). :NTHALpy kj/k! 222 11 11 117 115 155 375 272 159 131.7 128. 1438.1 1189.7 The local meteoric water line was calculated based on the weighted monthly isotopic averages of rainfall data from the Ilopango Station, San Salvador (IAEA, 1992). This data defines a linear regression equation of 62H = 7.92 * 6"O + 9.336, with a correlation coefficient r2 =.957 and n = 7 samples (Figure 6) very similar to the world meteoric line (Craig, 1963). This meteoric water line is assumed valid for Berlin geothermal area, considering the positions of shallow waters and the recent rain water samples. mixing trend between the meteoric end member and TR-5. Ilopango raln water shallow sprlngs Berlln raln Hater The isotopic data for wells (figure 7), indicates that waters such as those from L ap de Alegria (L.A.) and spring F-83, have undergone isotopic fractionation due to evaporation. -7 Lyu This enriched their isotopic composition to a maximum of -12 %O in Z2H. Spring F-2 having a temperature of 65 "C, shows slight enrichment in both l8 and 'H. As this spring discharges neutral equilibrated chloride-sulphate water, it is considered to represent a mixture of volcanic water with the NaCl water of the deep geothermal fluid. Assuming that the upflow is represented by well TR-5 as indicated in the chloride-enthalpy diagram (figure 5), figure 7 would indicate a.i3-12 -11-1 -9-8 -7-6 -5-4 -3-2 -1 6 Oxygen-18 (oloo) Fig. 6. Local meteoric water line defined by the equation S2H= 7.92 S1' + 9.336 and 2=.957, with n=7 samples (data from IAEA, 1992) If this mixing line is extrapolated, it would indicate a parent source that is isotopically heavy, likely andesitic in composition (Giggenbach, 1991). 5

'EAR 1968 1969 197 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 198 1981 1983 1984 Means S.D. 'OTAL IRECIP. 1818 1596 1759 1721 1543 1347 182 1552 1745 1625 188 1664 2142 472 1496 956 159 TRITIUM V.Means 22 2 26.5 19.6 14.7 1.3 9.4 9.1 8.1 9.6 1.1 5.5 5.9 4.9 6 %Y V.Means -8.2-1.4-7.45-7.97-5 -6.68-6.8-7.27-6.15-5.76-5.72-7.49-5.91-3.95-6.39-6.42-6.77 1.3 6'H %Y U. Means -6.9-67.3-44.8-3.2-44.1-39.2-48.2-39.9-39.6-5.5-37.1-4.9-55.9-45.8 9.7 ~~~ ~~~ )EUT. EXCESS W.Means 3.3 13.1 14.9 1.8 9.3 9.1 1 9.3 6.2 9.5 1.2 1.3 9.3 9.5 3 - ernp. & 22.7 23.3 22.8 23.5 24 23.1 22.9 22.8 23.4 23.5.3 Table 5. Rainfall Isotope Data, Ilopango Station, San Salvador (I.A.E.A., 1992) -1 { geothermal waters -2 <\ \I springs -3 A rainfall waters h. S -4 4 E 1 - * ij -5 B.u Lo -6 water-rock interaction I upflows and losses steam at its ascent or migration to the other wells. The steam is postulated to find its way into the fumaroles characteristic of Berlin geothermal field. Then, for wells TR-2, TR-9 and TR-3 relative to TR-5, the enthalpy and temperature decline as 6l8 and S2H become more positive. J -13-12 -11-1 -9-8 -7-6 -5-4 -3-2 -1 6 oxygen (1) Fig. 7. Relationship 6'* and S2H showing the main processes occurring in the geothermal area. The dashed lines show different evaporatio proportions and the solid line indicates the mixing trend. The LMWL is defined as in fig. 6 The mixing line could, however. not be connected to the other wells since their isotopic composition apparently are results of steam separation as the fluid, represented by TR-5, 8 1 2 3wO 4 5OmO BOO 7 8 Chloride in mglkg Fig. 8. Chloride and 6l8 relationship, showing the mixing trend between shallow waters and the deep andesitic water to produce the geothermal fluid 5 1

L A plot of the chloride content vs. 6I8O is shown in figure 8 to hrther illustrate that mixing occurs between upflowing geothermal fluid (TR-5) and shallow waters (considering also the spring F- 2). It also illustrates that separation of various proportions of steam from TR-5 and the deeper geothermal water occurs at temperatures between 28-29 "C. The spring Laguna de Alegria and F-83, show an enrichment in 6"O due to surface evaporation. The fluid of spring F-83 is the product of vapor condensation, probably from the steam that separates from the geothermal fluids. Postulating that the deeper geothermal fluid has a chloride content of 44 mgkg (figure 5), figure 8 indicates that this water will have an 618 content of about -2%. CONCLUSIONS The Berlin geothermal reservoir is characterized by sodium-chloride waters with reservoir chloride up to 3 mgkg at upflow tapped by well TR-5. The dilute waters are mainly HC3 found in the shallow aquifers. Sulfate waters related to the condensation into the groundwater of H2S rich steam mainly manifested in fumaroles, are also found to a limited extend. The chemical composition at reservoir conditions in the geothermal fluid is as follows: TDS : 5,8 ppm. Chloride : 3, ppm Silica : 73ppm PH : 5.7 Temperature : 35 "C Enthalpy : 1,3 J/g 6 l8 : -3.4% 6 2H : -43.4% Isotope and chemical data indicates that well TR- 5 is the most representative of the deep geothermal water. This geothermal water is a result of the mixture between meteoric and isotopically heavy parent water, likely andesitic in composition. The upflow at TR-5 originates from a postulated deep geothermal water which has a value of C1 close to 44 mgkg, 6 of -2 2 %O and 6 H of -4 %o. As the fluid ascend, it boils at about 28-29 "C. The separated waters enriched in chloride and isotopes is tapped by the wells TR-2, TR-3 and TR-9. The diagram C1 - enthalpy suggests that the main processes 18 occurring in the system are steam losses (prevalent for well TR-3) from the deeper geothermal water and conductive cooling. Steam separation from well TR-5 produces the fluids at TR-2, TR-3 and TR-9. The fluid of well TR-4 is produced from the TR-5 by mixing with meteoric water. The fluid of the wells TR-1 and TR-8 are produced from the fluid of TR-5 by conductive cooling. The local meteoric water line (LMWL) is defined by the ecuation F2H = 7.92 * 6l8 + 9.336 from the monthly isotope rainfall data from the Ilopango Station. This line is very similar to the global meteoric water line defined by Craig (1963). The general fluid flow direction from the upflow is from South to North. REFERENCES Amorsson S. and Svavarsson H., 1985. Application of chemical geothermometry to geothermal exploration and development. Geothermal Resources Council Trans., 9, 293-298. Fournier R.O., 1991. Water geothermometers applied to geothermal energy, ed. D'Amore F., UNITAR-UNDP, New York, 253-273. Fournier R.O. and Truesdell A.H.1973. An empirical Na-K-Ca geothermometer for natural waters. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 37, 515-525. Giggenbach W. F., 1988. Geothermal solute equilibria. Derivation of Na-K-Mg-Cageoindicators, Geoquim. cosmochim. Acta. 52. 2749-2765. Giggenbach W.F., 1991. Isotopic composition of geothermal water and steam discharges, in Application of Geochemistry in Geothermal Reservoir Development, ed. D'Amore F., UNITAR-UNDP, New York, 253-273, Henley, R.W., Truesdell A.H., Barton jr P.B., 1965. Fluid mineral equilibria in hydrothermal systems. Society of Economic Geologists, vol. 1. I.A.E.A., 1992. Statistical treatment of data on environmental isotopes in precipitation. Technical Reports No 33 1, Vienna, Austria. 52