The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24: The St. Patrick day (17 March 2015) event

Similar documents
Effect of CME Events of Geomagnetic Field at Indian Station Alibag and Pondicherry

LWS Workshop, Boulder March Work Supported by NASA/LWS

Long term data for Heliospheric science Nat Gopalswamy NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA

Extreme CME Events from the Sun Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC E. W. Cliver NSO. Space Climate 6, Levi, Finland April

The largest geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 23 occurred on 2003 November 20 with a

Inverse and normal coronal mass ejections: evolution up to 1 AU. E. Chané, B. Van der Holst, C. Jacobs, S. Poedts, and D.

INTERPLANETARY ASPECTS OF SPACE WEATHER

Coronal Mass Ejections in the Heliosphere

A STATISTICAL STUDY ON CORONAL MASS EJECTION AND MAGNETIC CLOUD AND THEIR GEOEFFECTIVENESS

Radio Observations and Space Weather Research

Relationship of interplanetary coronal mass ejections with geomagnetic activity

Interplanetary coronal mass ejections that are undetected by solar coronagraphs

PREDICTION OF THE IMF B z USING A 3-D KINEMATIC CODE

CME interactions with coronal holes and their interplanetary consequences

Response of the Earth s magnetosphere and ionosphere to the small-scale magnetic flux rope in solar wind by the MHD simulation

CMEs during the Two Activity Peaks in Cycle 24 and their Space Weather Consequences

3D MHD Numerical Study of Two CMEs Evolution and Their Interaction

Space Weather Effects of Coronal Mass Ejection

EFFECT OF SOLAR AND INTERPLANETARY DISTURBANCES ON SPACE WEATHER

Halo CMEs in October November 2003: predictions and reality

EUHFORIA: Modeling the dangers of the sun.

A NEW MODEL FOR REALISTIC 3-D SIMULATIONS OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE EVENTS

Effect of solar features and interplanetary parameters on geomagnetosphere during solar cycle-23

Solar and Interplanetary Disturbances causing Moderate Geomagnetic Storms

Solar cycle effect on geomagnetic storms caused by interplanetary magnetic clouds

, B z. ) Polarity and Statistical Analysis of Solar Wind Parameters during the Magnetic Storm Period

Geomagnetic Disturbance Report Reeve Observatory

Ooty Radio Telescope Space Weather

Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS

Geo-effective transients and their solar causes during solar cycle 23

The Solar wind - magnetosphere - ionosphere interaction

Properties and geoeffectiveness of magnetic clouds in the rising, maximum and early declining phases of solar cycle 23

Understanding the Nature of Collision of CMEs in the Heliosphere. Wageesh Mishra Postdoctoral Researcher with Yuming Wang

Coronal Mass Ejections and Extreme Events of Solar Cycle 23. Nat Gopalswamy NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

IDENTIFICATION OF SOLAR SOURCES OF MAJOR GEOMAGNETIC STORMS BETWEEN 1996 AND 2000 J. Zhang, 1 K. P. Dere, 2 R. A. Howard, 2 and V.

Observations of an interplanetary slow shock associated with magnetic cloud boundary layer

Simulation of the charging process of the LISA test masses due to solar particles.

Study of Geomagnetic Field Variations at Low Latitude of African Equatorial Region

Downstream structures of interplanetary fast shocks associated with coronal mass ejections

arxiv: v1 [physics.space-ph] 29 Sep 2017

Connecting Magnetic Clouds to Solar Surface Features

Deformation of ICME and MC on 1 30 AU Seen by Voyager 2 and WIND

Space Physics: Recent Advances and Near-term Challenge. Chi Wang. National Space Science Center, CAS

Energy Analysis During the Collision of Two Successive CMEs

Coronal mass ejection kinematics deduced from white light (Solar Mass Ejection Imager) and radio (Wind/WAVES) observations

Predicting the occurrence of super-storms

Geomagnetic storms. Measurement and forecasting

Space Weather. S. Abe and A. Ikeda [1] ICSWSE [2] KNCT

ESS 200C. Lectures 6 and 7 The Solar Wind

Lecture 5 CME Flux Ropes. February 1, 2017

19:00-20:30 Welcome Reception at the Wäinö Aaltonen Museum of Art. 09:40-10:10 An Historical Perspective on Coronal Mass Ejections: 5$

Imaging Spectroscopy of a Type II solar radio burst observed by LOFAR

Impacts of torus model on studies of geometrical relationships between interplanetary magnetic clouds and their solar origins

Magnetic Reconnection in ICME Sheath

INVESTIGATIONS OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE DIURNAL VARIATIONS OF GEOMAGNETIC FIELD

SOLAR ORBITER Linking the Sun and Inner Heliosphere. Daniel Müller

Signatures of Geomagnetic Storms and Coronal Mass Ejections on Electron and Ion Temperatures At Low Latitude Upper Ionosphere

A universal characteristic of type II radio bursts

Improved input to the empirical coronal mass ejection (CME) driven shock arrival model from CME cone models

A tentative study for the prediction of the CME related geomagnetic storm intensity and its transit time

Study of Flare Related Intense Geomagnetic Storms with Solar Radio Burst and JIMF

Solar-Wind/Magnetosphere Coupling

The CHARACTERISTICS OF FORBUSH DECREASES OF COSMIC RAY INTENSITY

In-Situ Signatures of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections

MHD MODELING FOR HMI JON A. LINKER SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL. CORP. SAN DIEGO

PC index as a standard of magnetospheric disturbances in the auroral zone

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 6 Jun 2013

Space Weather and Satellite System Interaction

Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements

CHAPTER 2 DATA. 2.1 Data Used

The Sun's Dynamic Influence on the Outer Heliosphere, the Heliosheath, and the Local Interstellar Medium

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 16 Nov 2010

Numerical simulation of the 12 May 1997 interplanetary CME event

HELCATS WP7 Update - overview. Mario Bisi on behalf of Jonathan Eastwood HELCATS month 12 meeting, May 2015, Göttingen, Germany

Ambient solar wind s effect on ICME transit times

BEHAVIOR OF PLASMA AND FIELD PARAMETERS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH GEOMAGNETIC INDICES DURING INTENSE GEOMAGNETIC STORMS OF SOLAR CYCLE 23

Interplanetary Field During the Current Solar Minimum

Relationship between Dst(min) magnitudes and characteristics of ICMEs

An Introduction to Space Weather. J. Burkepile High Altitude Observatory / NCAR

Multi-wavelength observations to understand the solar magnetic activity and its feedback on the interplanetary medium

Chapter 8 Geospace 1

Solar and interplanetary sources of major geomagnetic storms during

Variation of Solar Wind Parameters During Intense Geomagnetic Storms

7-8 March 2012: a busy period in the geospace

The importance of solar wind magnetic. the upcoming Sunjammer solar sail. field observations & mission

A first step towards proton flux forecasting

High energy particles from the Sun. Arto Sandroos Sun-Earth connections

Interplanetary magnetic structure guiding solar relativistic particles

Differences between CME associated and CH associated RED events during 2005

Relationship between Interplanetary (IP) Parameters and Geomagnetic Indices during IP Shock Events of 2005

Extreme Space Weather events of Colaba: Estimation of interplanetary conditions.

Why Study Magnetic Reconnection?

Magnetic environment on the shock driven by the 2012 January 27 CME

Coronal Mass Ejections as Key Players in Sun-Earth Connection

MHD simulation of solar wind using solar photospheric magnetic field data

Orientation and Geoeffectiveness of Magnetic Clouds as Consequences of Filament Eruptions

How is Earth s Radiation Belt Variability Controlled by Solar Wind Changes

1 Introduction. Cambridge University Press Physics of Space Plasma Activity Karl Schindler Excerpt More information

Solar and interplanetary sources of major geomagnetic storms (Dst 100 nt) during

STCE Newsletter. 7 Dec Dec 2015

Transcription:

The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24: The St. Patrick day (17 March 2015) event Chin Chun Wu 1, Kan Liou 2, Bernard Jackson 3, Hsiu Shan Yu 3, Lynn Hutting 1, R. P. Lepping 4, Simon Plunkett 1, Russell A. Howard 1, and Dennis Socker 1 (1)Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 20375, USA (2)Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, 20723, USA, (3)University of California, San Diego, California, USA, (4)Emeritus, GSFC/NASA, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

ABSTRACT The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24 occurred on the St. Patrick s day (17 March 2015). Notably, it was a two step storm. The source of the storm can be traced back to the solar event on March 15, 2015. At ~2:10 UT on that day, SOHO/LASCO C3 recorded a partial halo corona mass ejection (CME) which was associated with a C9.1/1F flare (S22W25) and a series of type II/IV radio bursts. The propagation speed of this CME is estimated to be ~668 km/s during 02:10 06:20 UT (See Figure 1). An interplanetary (IP) shock, likely driven by the CME, arrived at the Wind spacecraft at 03:59 UT on 17 March (See Figure 2). The arrival of the IP shock at the Earth may have caused a sudden storm commencement (SSC) at 04:45 UT on March 17. The storm intensified (Dst dropped to 80 nt at ~10:00 UT) during the crossing of CME sheath. Later, the storm recovered slightly (Dst ~ 50 nt) because the IMF turned northward. At 11:01 UT, IMF started turning southward again due to the large magnetic cloud (MC) field itself and caused the second storm intensification, reaching Dst = 228 nt on March 18. We conclude that the St. Patrick day event is a two step storm. The first step is associated with the sheath, whereas the second step is associated with the MC. Here, we employ a numerical simulation using the global, three dimensional (3D), time dependent, magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model (H3DMHD, Wu et al. 2007) to study the CME propagation from the Sun to the Earth. The H3DMHD model has been modified so that it can be driven by (solar wind) data at the inner boundary of the computational domain. In this study, we use time varying, 3D solar wind velocity and density reconstructed from STELab, Japan interplanetary scintillation (IPS) data by the University of California, San Diego, and magnetic field at the IPS inner boundary provided by CSSS model closed loop propagation (Jackson et a., 2015). The simulation result matches well with the in situ solar wind plasma and field data at Wind, in terms of the peak values of IP shock and its arrival time (See Figure 3). The simulation also helps us to identify the driver of the IP shock but also demonstrates that the modified H3DMHD model is capable of realistic simulations of large solar event. In this presentation, we will discuss the CME/storm event with detailed data from observations (Wind and SOHO) and our numerical simulation.

Corona images recorded by SOHO/LASCO C2 during 0000-0312UT on 15 March 2015. 2015 03 15 00:00UT 2015 03 15 01:48UT 2015 03 15 02:00UT 2015 03 15 02:12UT 2015 03 15 02:24UT 2015 03 15 02:36UT 2015 03 15 02:48UT 2015 03 15 03:12UT

Propagation speed of the CME on 15 March 2015 SOHO/LASCO C3 Averaged speed is 668 km/s

In situ solar wind profile during 16-18 March 2015 Geomagnetic activity index (Dst: top panel) and Wind observed in situ solar wind parameters (1 st 7 th panels) during March 16 18, 2015. From Top to Bottom: Dst, latitude (θ B ) and longitude (ϕ B ) in GSE cords., Bz of the field in GSE, proton temperature (T), bulk speed (V), and number density (Np), magnetic field (B) in terms of magnitude. The blue horizontal line in the 3 rd panel represents the scheme s identification of the extent of this MC candidate [Lepping et al., 1990]. The purple solid line and bluedashed lines represent the IP shock and the front boundary of the MC.

Cloud fitting for the MC on 17 March 2015

Global 3 D MHD Simulation Simulation Domain Coordinates - Sun-centered spherical coordinate system (r, θ, φ) -87.5 θ 87.5 0 ϕ 360 40 Rs r 345 Rs (MHD) Earth at (r, θ, ϕ) = (215 Rs, 0, 0 ) in the ecliptic plane Uniform grids and open boundary condition Uniform grid step size r = 3 Rs, θ = 5 and ϕ = 5 θ = ±87.5 (no reflective disturbances) Simulation procedure Using IPS data at 40 Rs to drive 3DMHD model

Governing Equations D V 0 Dt D V 1 GM ( r p ( B) B ) r 2 Dt r Conservation of mass Conservation of momentum [ e t 1 2 V 2 2 B 1 2 B ( V B) GM ( r) ] [ V{ e V p} ] v r 2 2 2 r Conservation of energy* B t ( V B) Induction equation In the equations, D/Dt denotes the total derivative, ρ is the mass density, V is the velocity of the flow, p is the gas pressure, B is the magnetic field, e is the internal energy per unit mass (e = p/(γ-1)ρ), GM(r) is solar gravitational force, and γ is the specific heat ratio. For this research, we applied an adiabatic gas assumption (i.e.,γ =5/3). In conservation of energy: we ignored the Coriolis force, Joule heating, thermal conduction, and viscous items. 8

Comparison of IPS-3DMHD and observation Observation (black dotted curves observed by Wind) and simulation (pinksolid curved simulated by IPS H3DMHD) of solar wind parameters during 01 27 March, 2015. From Top to Bottom: solar wind temperature (T), bulk speed (V), and number density (Np), magnetic field (B) in terms of magnitude.

Solar wind speed at 40 RSun

Solar wind speed at 40 RSun

Solar wind speed at 214 R Sun 1 AU

Evolution of CME 15March in the r Ф plane ICME Colors: velocity

Evolution of CME 15March in r Ф plane ICME Colors: density; Contours: velocity

Evolution of CME 15March in a r θ plane ICME Colors: density; Contours: velocity

Speed of CME 15March shock ICME CME Start r b Ending Δr d Δt e V f shock/cme V g Δt h pred Δt i ERR time a time c 2:30UT 03-15 2:30UT 03-15 2:00UT 03-15 6.95-18.82 3:57 UT 03-17 6.95-18.82 10:38 UT 03-17 4.15-6.61 10:38 UT 03-17 208.02 49.45 812.1 668? 60.94 23% 208.02 56.13 715.4 668 60.94 8% 210.85 56.63 718.8 606 67.17 19% a CME/shock was observed by SOHO/LASCO C3; b location of leading edge of CME measured by C3 (units in Rs); c startingpointat1au(wind); d distance between the initial point observed by C3 (3.63 Rs) and Wind (units in Rs); e Δt : travelling time of shock/cme between 3.63 Rs and 1 AU (units in hours); f V shock/cme = Δr/Δt (units in km/s) ; g V : V CME/shock measured near the Sun between 6.95 and 18.82 Rs (units in km/s); h Δt prediction : predicted travelling time for shock/cme propagating from 3.63 to 215 Rs (units in hours); i Δt ERR : error on the Δt pred =(Δt pred - Δt) /Δt x 100 (%). Note, 1 Rs equals to 6.95x10 5 km, and 1 AU equals to 215 Rs.

Conclusion The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24 occurred on the St. Patrick s day (17 March 2015). Notably, it was a two step storm. The source of the storm can be traced back to the solar event on March 15, 2015. At ~2:10 UT on that day, SOHO/LASCO C3 recorded a partial halo corona mass ejection (CME) which was associated with a C9.1/1F flare (S22W25) and a series of type II/IV radio bursts. The propagation speed of this CME is estimated to be ~668 km/s during 02:10 06:20 UT (See Figure 1). An interplanetary (IP) shock, likely driven by the CME, arrived at the Wind spacecraft at 03:59 UT on 17 March. We conclude that the St. Patrick day event is a two step storm. The first step is associated with the sheath, whereas the second step is associated with the MC. Here, we employ a numerical simulation using the global, three dimensional (3D), timedependent, magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model (H3DMHD, Wu et al. 2007) to study the CME propagation from the Sun to the Earth. The simulation result matches well with the in situ solar wind plasma and field data at Wind, in terms of the peak values of IP shock and its arrival time. The simulation also helps us to identify the driver of the IP shock but also demonstrates that the modified H3DMHD model is capable of realistic simulations of large solar event. In this presentation, we will discuss the CME/storm event with detailed data from observations (Wind and SOHO) and our numerical simulation.

Acknowledgement Work of CCW was supported by Chief of Naval Research.