Quantum Reservoir Engineering

Similar documents
Dispersive Readout, Rabi- and Ramsey-Measurements for Superconducting Qubits

Driving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian

Cavity optomechanics in new regimes and with new devices

Quantum optics. Marian O. Scully Texas A&M University and Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik. M. Suhail Zubairy Quaid-i-Azam University

SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Quantum simulation with superconducting circuits

Superconducting Qubits Lecture 4

Atom assisted cavity cooling of a micromechanical oscillator in the unresolved sideband regime

OIST, April 16, 2014

Cavity QED. Driven Circuit QED System. Circuit QED. decay atom: γ radiation: κ. E. Il ichev et al., PRL 03

S.K. Saikin May 22, Lecture 13

Dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits

Non-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout

Optomechanics and spin dynamics of cold atoms in a cavity

Superconducting Resonators and Their Applications in Quantum Engineering

Coherent oscillations in a charge qubit

Exploring the quantum dynamics of atoms and photons in cavities. Serge Haroche, ENS and Collège de France, Paris

9 Atomic Coherence in Three-Level Atoms

QIC 890/891, Module 4: Microwave Parametric Amplification in Superconducting Qubit Readout experiments

Quantum control of dissipative systems. 1 Density operators and mixed quantum states

Applied Physics 150a: Homework #3

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Spin-Boson Model. A simple Open Quantum System. M. Miller F. Tschirsich. Quantum Mechanics on Macroscopic Scales Theory of Condensed Matter July 2012

Quantum computation and quantum optics with circuit QED

Γ43 γ. Pump Γ31 Γ32 Γ42 Γ41

Introduction to Circuit QED

Short Course in Quantum Information Lecture 8 Physical Implementations

Distributing Quantum Information with Microwave Resonators in Circuit QED

Building Blocks for Quantum Computing Part IV. Design and Construction of the Trapped Ion Quantum Computer (TIQC)

Doing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Quantum computation with superconducting qubits

Supercondcting Qubits

Prospects for a superradiant laser

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics

Quantum Noise and Quantum Measurement

Coherence and optical electron spin rotation in a quantum dot. Sophia Economou NRL. L. J. Sham, UCSD R-B Liu, CUHK Duncan Steel + students, U Michigan

Circuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing

Single Microwave-Photon Detector based on Superconducting Quantum Circuits

REALIZING QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS WITH SUPERCONDUCTING NANOCIRCUITS

7 Three-level systems

Lecture 25. atomic vapor. One determines how the response of the medium to the probe wave is modified by the presence of the pump wave.

Supplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition

Requirements for scaleable QIP

Shot Noise and the Non-Equilibrium FDT

Electrical Quantum Engineering with Superconducting Circuits

Mesoscopic field state superpositions in Cavity QED: present status and perspectives

Photonic Micro and Nanoresonators

CIRCUIT QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS WITH ELECTRONS ON HELIUM

In Situ Imaging of Cold Atomic Gases

Synthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator

Nonlinear Oscillators and Vacuum Squeezing

Superconducting quantum bits. Péter Makk

Electrical quantum engineering with superconducting circuits

MESOSCOPIC QUANTUM OPTICS

Quantum Light-Matter Interactions

INTRODUCTION TO SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS AND QUANTUM EXPERIENCE: A 5-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN THE CLOUD

Superconducting Qubits Coupling Superconducting Qubits Via a Cavity Bus

Cooling Using the Stark Shift Gate

Quantum superpositions and correlations in coupled atomic-molecular BECs

Dissipation in Transmon

Elements of Quantum Optics

Quantum decoherence: From the self-induced approach to Schrödinger-cat experiments

Electronic Squeezing by Optically Pumped Phonons: Transient Superconductivity in K 3 C 60. With: Eli Wilner Dante Kennes Andrew Millis

List of Comprehensive Exams Topics

Solid State Physics IV -Part II : Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena

Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation

Final Report. Superconducting Qubits for Quantum Computation Contract MDA C-A821/0000

Optomechanically induced transparency of x-rays via optical control: Supplementary Information

Lecture 11, May 11, 2017

Introduction to Quantum Noise, Measurement and Amplification: Online Appendices

The SQUID-tunable resonator as a microwave parametric oscillator

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Supplementary information

Quantum Optics in Photonic Crystals. Peter Lodahl Dept. of Communications, Optics & Materials (COM) Technical University of Denmark

2015 AMO Summer School. Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits I. Io-Chun, Hoi

Optical Lattices. Chapter Polarization

Quantum Spectrometers of Electrical Noise

Single Emitter Detection with Fluorescence and Extinction Spectroscopy

A Superconducting Quantum Simulator for Topological Order and the Toric Code. Michael J. Hartmann Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh qlightcrete 2016

Cooperative Phenomena

Population Dynamics and Emission Spectrum of a Cascade Three-Level Jaynes Cummings Model with Intensity-Dependent Coupling in a Kerr-like Medium

Quantum Many-Body Phenomena in Arrays of Coupled Cavities

Theoretical design of a readout system for the Flux Qubit-Resonator Rabi Model in the ultrastrong coupling regime

Ion trap quantum processor

THEORY SMG, L. Glazman, Liang Jiang. EXPERIMENT Rob Schoelkopf, Michel Devoret Luigi Frunzio. Simon Nigg M. Mirrahimi Z. Leghtas

Philipp T. Ernst, Sören Götze, Jannes Heinze, Jasper Krauser, Christoph Becker & Klaus Sengstock. Project within FerMix collaboration

Cavity QED with Rydberg Atoms Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris

Exploring parasitic Material Defects with superconducting Qubits

Introduction to Modern Quantum Optics

Ground state cooling via Sideband cooling. Fabian Flassig TUM June 26th, 2013

Remote entanglement of transmon qubits

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Non-equilibrium Dynamics in Ultracold Fermionic and Bosonic Gases

Quantum Computation with Neutral Atoms

Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Circuit QED

Spontaneous Emission and the Vacuum State of EM Radiation. Miriam Klopotek 10 December 2007

Survey on Laser Spectroscopic Techniques for Condensed Matter

Transcription:

Departments of Physics and Applied Physics, Yale University Quantum Reservoir Engineering Towards Quantum Simulators with Superconducting Qubits SMG Claudia De Grandi (Yale University) Siddiqi Group (Berkeley)

Noise and Dissipation: Friend or Foe? Clerk et al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010) 2

Challenge: Quantum state control in the presence of noise and dissipation How do we correct non-unitary errors? ρ = = EρE; EE I 3

Challenge: Quantum state control in the presence of noise and dissipation How do we correct non-unitary errors? ρ = = EρE; EE I Active feedback: classical measurement result fed back to controller which applies a unitary that is conditioned on measurement result. 4

Challenge: Quantum state control in the presence of noise and dissipation How do we correct non-unitary errors? ρ = = EρE; EE I Autonomous feedback: embedded into the system as a quantum bath Paradox: We can use dissipation as a tool to create and maintain coherence. (Poyatos et al. PRL 1996) Interference between coherent drives and quantum noise of bath can be useful. (Murch et al. PRL 2012) 5

Q Example: Photon shot noise in a driven damped cavity Coherent drive Interference leads to amplitude fluctuations I 2 1/2 1/2 (nˆ n) = n Vacuum noise Rectification of vacuum noise ˆ = aa (non-linear in field) n Interference κ t 2 2 ntn ˆ( ) ˆ(0) = n + ne Coherent drive Nota Bene Cavity filtered vacuum noise (zero temperature) ω R 0 ω R ω 6

Example: Photon shot noise in a driven damped cavity Rectification of vacuum noise when drive is red detuned from cavity Spectral density of shot noise moves up to positive frequencies Bath can absorb energy (by Raman scattering of pump photon up to cavity) Bath cannot emit energy Cooling! V = χ O ( ˆ system n n) shot noise Coherent drive Interference Cavity filtered vacuum noise ω R 0 ω R ω 7

Shot noise spectral density for drive red-detuned by distance Clerk et al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010) S nn ( ω) = n κ ( ω ) + ( κ / 2) 2 2 S ( ) nn ω Quantum shot noise spectral density is ASYMMETRIC + κ ω 1 0 Γ01 Γ10 Γ = + 2 10 χ S nn ( ) bath absorbs Γ = 2 01 χ S nn ( ) bath emits Fermi Golden Rule Picture: Clerk et al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010) 8

Autonomous Feedback: Quantum Reservoir Engineering We can use photon shot noise to cool a qubit + x = 1 g + e 2 to any point on the Bloch sphere, e.g. ( ) x +x H X Z = Ω ˆ Rabi σ + χσ ( n n) Ω Rabi Rabi drive on qubit <1mK (!) Cavity-assisted quantum bath engineering (Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012) Berkeley: K. W. Murch, S. J. Weber, I. Siddiqi Yale: U. Vool, D. Zhou, SMG shot noise of driven cavity dispersive coupling Dissipator cools qubit via ump operator: c= + x x Two qubit entanglement: S. Shankar et al. (Devoret) Nature (2013). 9

Quantum Reservoir Engineering to create persistent Ramsey fringes Dissipator cools qubit via ump operator: c= + x x T eff ~ 150µ K Persistent Ramsey fringes (with enhanced visibility) Murch et al. PRL (2012) 10

Canonical Ensemble Quantum Simulator for 1D Bose-Hubbard Model Berkeley: Shay Hacohen-Gourgy Vinay Ramasesh Irfan Siddiqi Yale: Claudia De Grandi SMG Transmon qubit array in cavity 11

End qubits flux-tunable (SQUIDs) ω L = 2π x 5.058 GHz ω R = 2π x 5.161 GHz α L = α R = - 2π x 214 MHz Cavity ω M = 2π x 7.116 GHz κ = 2π x 10 MHz g 1 = 2π x 0.149 GHz g 2 = 2π x 0.264 GHz g 3 = 2π x 0.145 GHz Middle qubit fixed (single-unction) ω M = 2π x 4.856 GHz α M = - 2π x 240 MHz Couplings J 12, J 23 = 2π x 0.177 GHz J 13 = 2π x 0.026 GHz 12

First 9 excited levels of three-transmon array Dark state F E 2 boson manifold Theory fit J ~ 180MHz α ~ 240MHz 1 boson manifold Transmon qubit array in cavity 13

Canonical Ensemble Quantum Simulator for 1D Bose-Hubbard Model Engineer bath to remove entropy and energy but not bosons! [cf. Jake Taylor Chemical Potential for Light ] X X X H bb =, 0 0 1 H = ω bb + J bb α bbbb 0 site energy Bose-Hubbard Model k k k 2 boson hopping (dipole coupling) Hubbard U<0 14

X X X H = ω aa+ ω bb + J bb + g ( ab + ab) V 0 = Couple Bose-Hubbard lattice to cavity photons to create dissipation 1 2 Q k k k α bbbb N.B. H0, bb 0 15

Diagonalize Quadratic H 0 H = ω aa+ ω bb + J bb + g ( ab + ab) k 0 Q k k k a= Λ A+ Λ B 00 0 b = Λ A+ Λ B k 0 k H = ω AA+ ω BB 0 Q 16

H ω AA ω BB = + 0 Q Quartic Term becomes (in RWA): V = 1 2 V~ α BBBB+ A A χ BB + χ AAAA ikl α bbbb ikl i k l i i 0 i + Normal modes scatter due to Hubbard interactions H + V BB = 0, 0* Dispersive coupling of (dressed) cavity to normal modes Small cavity self-kerr (Fine print re. Purcell effect) 17

Quantum Bath Engineering for 1D Bose-Hubbard Model X X X Red detuned drive Entropy and energy leave via Raman photons at cavity frequency A A χ BB nˆ χ B B i i i i i i = Shot noise fluctuations cause cooling transitions which conserve particle number. 18

A A χ BB nˆ χ B B i i i i i i = Shot noise fluctuations cause cooling transitions which conserve particle number. S nn ( ω) = n Fermi Golden Rule cooling rate Γ = Ψ χ ( ) ibb i Ψ Snn ω ω 1 2 2 1 1 2 i κ ( ω ) + ( κ / 2) 2 2 2 S ( ) nn ω κ Drive detuning + ω 19

NATURAL DECAY DYNAMICS 20

COOLING COHERENT DRIVES TRANSFER EXCITATIONS BETWEEN SUBSPACES COOLING DRIVES TRANSFER EXCITATIONS WITHIN A SUBSPACE ACCESS DARK STATES 21

COOLING RATES 22

STATE STABILIZATION: F 1 > Can stabilize any many-body eigenstate Preserves particle number in Bose-Hubbard Model 23

PERSPECTIVES STATE SYMMETRY CAN FACILITATE COOLING/QBE COOLING OF QUBIT CHAINS - PREPARE & HOLD N-BODY EIGENSTATE (EG. RESET) - DISSIPATIVE BOSE-HUBBARD PHYSICS - ACCESS DARK STATES - ENERGY FLOW / THERMODYNAMICS - QUANTUM EMULATION IN LONG-CHAINS / ARRAYS FOR FUTURE QUANTUM SIMULATOR NEED: ABILITY TO MEASURE LOCAL QUBIT CORRELATORS IN MANY-BODY STATE 24

EXTRA SLIDES BEYOND HERE 27

Dissipation and decoherence are caused by coupling to quantum and thermal noise of the surrounding reservoir. ωq z ˆ () x Example: H = σ + Ft σ 2 Classically the noise correlator is real: G () t FtF ˆ() ˆ(0) FF and hence its spectral density iωt S ( ) ˆ( ) ˆ FF ω dte F t F(0) is symmetric in frequency: S FF ( ω) = S ( ω) FF Not true quantum mechanically because: Ft ˆ( ), Fˆ(0) 0 28

Example: H ωσ z = q + ˆ () x Ftσ Ft ˆ( ), Fˆ(0) 0 Implies FtF ˆ( ) ˆ(0) is not Hermitian and so the noise correlator G () t FtF ˆ() ˆ(0) FF is complex and hence its spectral density iωt S ( ) ˆ( ) ˆ FF ω dte F t F(0) can be asymmetric in frequency: S FF ( ω) S ( ω) FF 29

harmonic oscillator example: ZPF ( ˆ ˆ ) ˆF = F b+ b 2 G ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ FF () t F() t F(0) = F ZPF b() t b (0) + b () t b(0) 2 ( ) iω0t + iω0t GFF () t = F ZPF nb + 1e + ne B (is complex) S FF ( ω) = 2 π ( n ) B + 1 δω ( ω0) + nbδω ( + ω0) Stimulated emission (bath absorbs) Absorption (bath emits) (is asymmetric) 30

quantum noise NOT (necessarily) symmetric in frequency: S ( ) FF ω ω < 0 bath emits energy into system ω > 0 bath absorbs energy from system Ω +Ω ω In thermal equilibrium: (or pseudo-equilibrium) S S FF FF ( +Ω ) = ( Ω) e β Ω = 1 for 0 31

Fermi s Golden Rule in terms of noise spectral density Example: H ωq = σ z + ˆ () x Ft σ 2 1 0 Γ01 Γ10 Γ = S ( + ω ) bath absorbs 10 FF q Γ = S ( ω ) bath emits 01 FF q For quantum noise picture of FGR see: Clerk et al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010) 32

Shot noise as rectified vacuum noise Rectified vacuum noise (number fluctuations) (mostly positive freq.) classical laser drive (pos./neg. frequency) Vacuum noise in cavity (electric field, no photons) (positive frequency only) ω L 0 + Electric field spectral density Photon number spectral density S ( ) EE ω S ( ) nn ω κ +ω L ω R κ ω R ω L ω 33

Rabi experiment: decoherence of driven qubit in rotating frame: ΩR 1 x () () H= σ + Ut ξ t σ U () t 2 2 G. Ithier, et al., Phys. Rev. B 72, 134519 (2005). 1 31 1 1 = + T 4T 2 T ( Ω ) T Rabi 1 ϕ R ϕ 1 1 { } 1 = S zz ( +Ω R) + S zz ( ΩR) ( Ω ) 4 T R but can be smaller if Rabi rate is high ϕ Ω R S zz ( ω) +Ω R ΩR kt B noise is classical so symmetric in frequency (and probably non-eq.) ω 34

Choose cavity drive detuning to match mechanical oscillator frequency ω =Ω R ω L M Resolved sideband limit: +Ω M > κ noise is cold Shot noise emits energy into oscillator ω < 0 S ( ) nn ω Shot noise (radiation pressure) absorbs energy from oscillator κ ω > 0 Ω M +Ω M ω 35

Fermi s Golden Rule in terms of noise spectral density H X Z = Ω ˆ Rabi σ + χσ ( n n) shot noise of driven cavity X +X Γ01 Γ10 Γ = +Ω 2 10 χ S nn ( R ) bath absorbs Γ = Ω 2 01 χ S nn ( R ) bath emits For quantum noise picture of FGR see: Clerk et al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010) 36