Seismogram Interpretation. Seismogram Interpretation

Similar documents
The Earth s Structure from Travel Times

Basic Ray Tracing. Rick Aster and Sue Bilek. October 3, 2003

Earthquake location at teleseismic distances from 3-component records (Tutorial with exercise by hand)

Global 1-D Earth models

3D IMAGING OF THE EARTH S MANTLE: FROM SLABS TO PLUMES

Introduction to Seismology

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 9: Anisotropy, attenuation and anelasticity

Decoding seismograms, theoretical travel times. Simple velocity models of the Earth

Global surface-wave tomography

Figures S1 S4 show the measurements taken from the synthetic vespagrams where a)

Numerical Methods in Spherical Geometry

Tracing rays through the Earth

Introduction to Engineering Seismology Lecture 6

Seismic Scattering in the Deep Earth

Finite-frequency sensitivity of body waves to anisotropy based upon adjoint methods

MYRES Seismic Constraints on Boundary Layers. Christine Thomas

Seismic ray path variations in a 3D global velocity model

Constraints on earthquake epicentres independent of seismic velocity models

Imaging sharp lateral velocity gradients using scattered waves on dense arrays: faults and basin edges

APPLICATION OF RECEIVER FUNCTION TECHNIQUE TO WESTERN TURKEY

Tomography of the 2011 Iwaki earthquake (M 7.0) and Fukushima

ANEWJOINTP AND S VELOCITY MODEL OF THE MANTLE PARAMETERIZED IN CUBIC B-SPLINES

Broadband converted phases from midmantle discontinuities

Exploring Inside the Earth. What Seismic Waves Tell Us About Earth s Interior

Probing Mid-Mantle Heterogeneity Using PKP Coda Waves

Slabs, plumes and their interaction: new insights from global anisotropy tomography

C3.4.1 Vertical (radial) variations in mantle structure

Observation of shear-wave splitting from microseismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing: A non-vti story

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

BRIEF ARTICLE THE AUTHOR

Estimation of S-wave scattering coefficient in the mantle from envelope characteristics before and after the ScS arrival

Constraints on density and shear velocity contrasts at the inner core boundary

TOMOGRAPHY S VELOCITY STRUCTURE BETWEEN WASHINGTON S EARTHQUAKE C022801L AND OBSERVATIONAL STATION TUC THROUGH SEISMOGRAM ANALYSIS

Selected Seismic Observations of Upper-Mantle Discontinuities

Geophysical Journal International

Seismic wave eld calculation for laterally heterogeneous earth modelsöii. The in uence of upper mantle heterogeneity

LAB 3: GLOBAL SEISMOLOGY

Earthquake Focal Mechanisms and Waveform Modeling

Time dependence of PKP(BC) PKP(DF) times: could this be an artifact of systematic earthquake mislocations?

FOCAL MECHANISM DETERMINATION USING WAVEFORM DATA FROM A BROADBAND STATION IN THE PHILIPPINES

Global geophysics and wave propagation

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies MODELING P WAVE MULTIPATHING IN SOUTHEAST ASIA

Changbaishan volcanism in northeast China linked to subduction-induced mantle upwelling

Mantle and crust anisotropy in the eastern China region inferred from waveform

High Resolution Imaging of Fault Zone Properties

4.2 Solutionfor the ElastodynamicGreenFunctioninaHomogeneous, Isotropic,UnboundedMedium 73

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 12: Earthquake source mechanisms and radiation patterns II

Vertical coherence in mantle heterogeneity from global seismic data

Thorne, Garnero, Jahnke, Igel, McNamara Supplementary Material - 1 -

Existence of finite rigidity layer at the base of the Earth s liquid outer core inferred from anomalous splitting of normal modes

Multi-station Seismograph Network

EARTH STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY PRACTICALS. G.R. Foulger

Recall Hypsometric Curve?

Lateral variation of the D 00 discontinuity beneath the Cocos Plate

Mantle flow and multistage melting beneath the Galápagos hotspot revealed by seismic imaging

Evidence for P P asymmetrical scattering at near podal distances

ANALYSIS OF TRAVEL TIME RESIDUA AT POLISH SEISMOLOGICAL STATIONS ( )

Relocation of a global earthquake data set with a 3-D velocity model

Trans-Pacific upper mantle shear velocity structure

INVERSE PROBEMS: AN INTRODUCTION

Topic 12 Review Book Earth s Dynamic Crust and Interior

Travel time tomography of the uppermost mantle beneath Europe

Aspects of Observational Seismology

The Solid Earth Chapter 4 Answers to selected questions. (1) Love waves involve transverse motion, generally arrive before Rayleigh waves.

The global short-period wavefield modelled with a Monte Carlo seismic phonon method

Global propagation of body waves revealed by cross-correlation analysis of seismic hum

Valérie Maupin Department of Geosciences University of Oslo, Norway.

9 June 15. Horst Rademacher. Lect 4: Seismic Waves. Summer Session 2015

COMPUTATION OF REGIONAL TRAVEL TIMES AND STATION CORRECTIONS FROM THREE-DIMENSIONAL VELOCITY MODELS

Geophysical Journal International

Crust and upper mantle P- and S-wave delay times at Eurasian seismic stations

Waveform search for the innermost inner core

Seismic tomography: Art or science?

The Seismic Wavefield

by Xiao-Bi Xie and Thorne Lay

Lower Mantle Structure & Geo-neutrinos

Imaging the mantle beneath Iceland using integrated seismological techniques

RELATIVE SEISMIC ATTENUATION ESTIMATION

INTERPRETATION OF SEISMOGRAMS

Supporting Online Material for

Scattering objects in the lower mantle beneath northeastern China observed with a short-period seismic array

Physics and Chemistry of the Earth and Terrestrial Planets

GLOBAL MANTLE TOMOGRAPHY: Progress Status in the Past 10 Years

Supplementary Online Material for. Seismic evidence for a chemically distinct thermochemical reservoir in Earth s deep mantle beneath Hawaii

Global variation of body wave attenuation in the upper mantle from teleseismic P wave and S wave spectra

Some aspects of seismic tomography

Recall Hypsometric Curve?

PHASE TIME INVERSION: A SIMPLE METHOD FOR REGIONAL WAVEFORM INVERSION. Charles A. Langston. University of Memphis

Seismic Wave Propagation and Scattering in the Heterogeneous Earth : Second Edition

Three-dimensional structure of the African superplume from waveform modelling

Elastic full waveform inversion for near surface imaging in CMP domain Zhiyang Liu*, Jie Zhang, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC)

A shear-wave traveling through an anisotropic medium is split into two perpendicular

Surface Wave Tomography

SURFACE WAVE DISPERSION PRACTICAL (Keith Priestley)

Chapter 12 Lecture. Earth: An Introduction to Physical Geology. Eleventh Edition. Earth s Interior. Tarbuck and Lutgens Pearson Education, Inc.

Ability of a global three-dimensional model to locate regional events

CHAPTER 2. Seismology (continued)

Yanbu University College. General Studies Department. PHSC001 Course. Chapter9 (Basic Geology: Earthquakes and volcanoes ) Worksheet Solutions

Structural sensitivities of finite-frequency seismic waves: a full-wave approach

Transcription:

Travel times in the Earth Ray paths, phases and their name Wavefields in the Earth: SH waves, P-SV waves Seismic Tomography Receiver Functions

Seismogram Example Long-period transverse displacement for an earthquake at 600km depth recorded at 130 o (synthetic). How can we extract information from seismograms on Earth structure? -> identify phases -> pick travel times -> collect travel times as a function of distance 4400s

Travel times in the Earth Travel times for a spherically symmetric Earth model (IASP91) Source at 600km depth Automatic Picks from real data

History of Travel-Times Harrold Jeffreys and Keith Bullen (1940), (J-B) Remarkable accuracy for teleseismic travel times (below 1%)! Herrin et al. (1968), with well located earthquakes. Dziewonski and Anderson (1981), Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM) Kennett and Engdahl (1991), most accurate radially symmetric model (iasp91) (2000), The first 3-D reference model with travel times?

Ray Paths in the Earth (1) Particular phases at teleseismic distances are named after the wave types (P or S), regions they pass along their path, and emergence angle at the source (upwards or downwards).

Ray Paths in the Earth (2) The core-mantle boundary has the most dominant effect on the global wavefield. Multiple reflections from it reveal information on attenuation and the structure near the CMB.

Ray Paths in the Earth - Names P S small p small s c K i I P waves S waves depth phases (P) depth phases (S) Reflection from CMB wave inside core Reflection from Inner core boundary wave through inner core Examples: PcP, ppcs, SKS, PKKKP, PKiKP, PKIKP, sss, psss, spcs, etc.

Wavefields in the Earth: SH waves Red and yellow color denote positive and negative displacement, respectively. Wavefield for earthquake at 600km depth.

Wavefields in the Earth: SH waves Red and yellow color denote positive and negative displacement, respectively. Wavefield for earthquake at 600km depth.

Wavefields in the Earth: SH waves Red and yellow color denote positive and negative displacement, respectively. Wavefield for earthquake at 600km depth.

Wavefields in the Earth: SH waves Red and yellow color denote positive and negative displacement, respectively. Wavefield for earthquake at 600km depth.

SH waves: seismograms SH-seismograms for a source at 600km depth

Wavefields in the Earth: P-SV waves Red and yellow color denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Left: homogeneous mantle, right: realistic spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at 600km depth.

Wavefields in the Earth: P-SV waves Red and yellow color denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Left: homogeneous mantle, right: realistic spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at 600km depth.

Wavefields in the Earth: P-SV waves Red and yellow color denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Left: homogeneous mantle, right: realistic spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at 600km depth.

Wavefields in the whole Earth: P waves Red and blue colors denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at surface. Time: 150s

Wavefields in the whole Earth: P waves Red and blue colors denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at surface. Time: 450s

Wavefields in the whole Earth: P waves Red and blue colors denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at surface. Time: 750s

Wavefields in the whole Earth: P waves Red and blue colors denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at surface. Time: 1050s

Wavefields in the whole Earth: P waves Red and blue colors denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at surface. Time: 1350s

Wavefields in the 3-D Earth Red and yellow colors denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at 600km depth. Time: 125s

Wavefields in the 3-D Earth Red and yellow colors denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at 600km depth. Time: 250s

Wavefields in the 3-D Earth Red and yellow colors denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at 600km depth. Time: 320s

Wavefields in the 3-D Earth Red and yellow colors denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at 600km depth. Time: 410s

Wavefields in the 3-D Earth: the Movie Red and yellow colors denote positive and negative vertical displacement, respectively. Spherically symmetric model (Preliminary Reference Earth Model, PREM) Wavefield for explosion at 600km depth.

P-wave seismograms P-wave seismograms for a source at 200km depth, can you identify some phases? Ray-theoretical travel times are added for the direct P wave, the PP and the PKP phase.

P-wave seismograms (PKP) PKP phase at 145 o distance (source at surface). Note the sudden change of amplitude! Why?

SH-wave seismograms SH seismograms for a source at the surface.

Epicentral Ranges Three characteristic ranges used in seismic studies: 0-13 near-field or regional range: crustal phases, spherical geometry can be neglected 13-30 upper-mantle distance range. Dominated by upper mantle triplications. 30-180 teleseismic range: waves that sample lower mantle, core, upper mantle reverberations.

Epicentral Ranges - Experiments Three characteristic ranges used in seismic studies: 0-13 near-field complex crustal structure seismic reflection and refraction methods 13-30 upper-mantle complex tectonic features, high-pressure phase transitions 30-180 teleseismic seismic tomography, 3-D global structure

Earth Structure Inversion How to proceed to determine Earth structure from observed seismograms using travel times? 1. Determine epicentral distance (from P and S or Rayleigh, then compare with travel time tables) 2. Get travel times for other phases PP, ScS, pp, ss, determine differential travel times (e.g. pp-p, ss-s) to estimate source depth 3. Determine travel time perturbations from spherically symmetric model (e.g. iasp91, PREM) - the observability of seismic phases depends on the source radiation pattern - they are also frequency dependent - all three components of displacement should be used for analysis

Earth Structure Inversion. We have recorded a set of travel times and we want to determine the structure of the Earth. In a very general sense we are looking for an Earth model that minimizes the difference between a theoretical prediction and the observed data: traveltimes Tobs Ttheory ( m) = Min! where m is an Earth model. For spherically symmetric media we can solve the problem analytically:

Wiechert-Herglotz Inversion Previously we derived the travel times for a given layered velocity structure for flat and spherical media: the forward problem Flat Spherical T = px + 2 z 0 1/ c 2 ( z) p 2 dz T = p + 2 r 1 r 0 r 2 / c 2 r ( z) 2 p 2 dr The first term depends only on the horizontal distance and the second term only depends on r (z), the vertical dimension.

Wiechert-Herglotz Inversion The solution to the inverse problem can be obtained after some manipulation of the integral : T r 1 2 2 2 1 r / c ( z) p r = + 0 1 p 2 dr ln = cosh 2 r r1 π 0 r 1 0 forward problem 1 inverse problem p d ξ The integral of the inverse problem contains only terms which can be obtained from observed T( ) plots. The quantity ξ 1 =p 1 =(dt/d ) 1 is the slope of T( ) at distance 1. The integral is numerically evaluated with discrete values of p( ) for all from 0 to 1. We obtain a value for r 1 and the corresponding velocity at depth r 1 is obtained through ξ 1 =r 1 /v 1.

Nonuniqueness in Travel-time Inversion A first arrival travel time curve is compatible with an infinite set of structures -> non-uniqueness

Constraints by Wavefield Effects Structural sensitivity can be improved by using the complete wavefield information and broadband data: waveform shape can constrain complexity Improving full wavefield modelling and inversion is one of the most important goals in modern seismology!

Seismic Tomography The three-dimensional variations in seismic velocities contain crucial information on the Earth s dynamic behavior! Seismic tomography aims at finding the 3-D velocity perturbations with respect to a spherically symmetric background model from observed seismic travel times (body waves and surface waves, free oscillations) What are the similarities and differences to medical tomography?

Seismic Tomography - Principles A particular seismic phase has a travel time T which is given by a path integral through the medium as T u( s) ds = ds = v( s) s where u(s) is the slowness [1/v(s)] along the path s. A travel time perturbation can happen anywhere along the path s u( s) ds s = T = T obs T pred A medium is discretized into blocks and thus we can calulate the path length l j in each block to obtain T = l j u for many observations j j T i = j l ij u j We want to find u i from observed travel times -> inverse problem

Receiver Functions Receiver functions have been used recently to study upper mantle structure.

Heterogeneities inside the Earth (1) Global average; (2,3) lower mantle; (4,5,6) upper mantle from surface waves; (7) asthenosphere; (8) upper mantle from body waves; (9) upper mantle; (11-14) lithosphere; (15,16) crust.

Attenuation from Multiples Multiple reflections from the core mantle boundary can be used to infer the attenuation of seismic waves inside the mantle

: Summary The most important information on on the 3-D structure of of the Earth is is contained in in the travel times of of particular seismic phases (e.g. P, P, S, S, ScS, PcP, PKP, PPP, sss, etc.) travelling thorugh the Earth s interior. The radial structure of of the Earth explains all all observed travel times to to within 1% accuracy. Several such structures have been determined since the 1940s (e.g. Jeffrey-Bullen, Herrin, PREM, iasp91). The radial structure of of the Earth can be be estimated using first-arrival travel times and the Wiechert-Herglotz inversion technique. The deviations of of the observed travel-times from the predicted travel times for spherically symmetric models are used to to estimate the Earth s 3-D seismic velocity structure. This processing is is called seismic tomography. Although the travel time data are explained to to within 1% by by a spherically symmetric structure, the 3-D velocity structure contains crucial information on on the dynamic properties of of the Earth s mantle (e.g. subducting slabs, plumes, etc.)