High-energy Gamma Rays detection with the AMS-02 electromagnetic calorimeter. F. Pilo for the AMS-02 ECAL Group INFN Sezione di Pisa, Italy

Similar documents
THE ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER OF THE AMS-02 EXPERIMENT

Dark Matter Searches with AMS-02. AMS: Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

Performance of the AMS-02 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in Space

Chapter 6.2: space based cosmic ray experiments. A. Zech, Instrumentation in High Energy Astrophysics

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 3 Feb 2014

Cosmic Ray Physics with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

Justin Vandenbroucke (KIPAC, Stanford / SLAC) for the Fermi LAT collaboration

NA62: Ultra-Rare Kaon Decays

AMS : A Cosmic Ray Observatory

The GILDA mission: a new technique for a gamma-ray telescope in the energy range 20 MeV GeV

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

GeV to Multi-TeV Cosmic Rays: AMS-02 Status and Future Prospects

Towards Direction Dependent Fluxes With AMS-02

The Large Area Telescope on-board of the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission

Indirect Search for Dark Matter with AMS-02

PAMELA: a Satellite Experiment for Antiparticles Measurement in Cosmic Rays

The space mission PAMELA

Experimental review of high-energy e e + and p p spectra

Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics. PAMELA MissioN 17 December 2010 Prepared by FatiH KAYA

Measurement of absolute energy scale of ECAL of DAMPE with geomagnetic rigidity cutoff

Antimatter and DM search in space with AMS Introduction. 2 Cosmology with Cosmic Rays

CALET INSTRUMENT. Calorimeter CGBM

The Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the HERA-B Experiment

Cosmic Ray panorama. Pamela.roma2.infn.it PAMELA (2012) Experimental challenges : e + /p ~ 10-3 e + /e - ~ 10-1

1 The beginning of Cosmic Ray Physics, the balloons BACKGROUND REJECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS. Aldo Morselli a and Piergiorgio Picozza a.

Thin Calorimetry for Cosmic-Ray Studies Outside the Earth s Atmosphere. 1 Introduction

Dark Matter Particle Explorer: The First Chinese Cosmic Ray and Hard γ-ray Detector in Space

Preliminary results from gamma-ray observations with the CALorimeteric Electron Telescope (CALET)

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. First Physics at CMS

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 2 Jul 2009

PAMELA satellite: fragmentation in the instrument

The PAMELA Satellite Experiment: An Observatory in Space for Particles, Antiparticles and Nuclei in the Cosmic Rays

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters

THE AMS RICH COUNTER

New results from the AMS experiment on the International Space Station. Henning Gast RWTH Aachen

Indirect Dark Matter Detection

The Ring Imaging Cherenkov detector of the AMS experiment: test beam results with a prototype

DARK MATTER SEARCHES WITH AMS-02 EXPERIMENT

STATUS OF ATLAS TILE CALORIMETER AND STUDY OF MUON INTERACTIONS. 1 Brief Description of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter

PHY326/426 Dark Matter and the Universe. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev F9b, Tel.:

Calibration of the AGILE Gamma Ray Imaging Detector

The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station

NA64. Dipanwita Banerjee ETH, Zurich On behalf of the NA64 collaboration

CALICE Test Beam Data and Hadronic Shower Models

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 18 Feb 2009

The new event analysis of the Fermi Large Area Telescope

The AMS-02 Anticoincidence Counter

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SIMULATION OF THE GAMMA-RAY GALACTIC DISTRIBUTION AS SEEN BY THE AMS-02

AIM AIM. Study of Rare Interactions. Discovery of New High Mass Particles. Energy 500GeV High precision Lots of events (high luminosity) Requirements

Precision measurements of nuclear CR energy spectra and composition with the AMS-02 experiment

PoS(ICRC2017)208. Particle tracking in the CALET experiment. Paolo Maestro (for the CALET Collaboration)

Current and Future balloon and space experiments L. Derome (LPSC Grenoble) Tango, May 4-6th, 2009

Future prospects for the measurement of direct photons at the LHC

Antiproton Flux and Antiproton-to-Proton Flux Ratio in Primary Cosmic Rays Measured with AMS on the Space Station

ATLAS EXPERIMENT : HOW THE DATA FLOWS. (Trigger, Computing, and Data Analysis)

High-energy neutrino detection with the ANTARES underwater erenkov telescope. Manuela Vecchi Supervisor: Prof. Antonio Capone

Neutral particles energy spectra for 900 GeV and 7 TeV p-p collisions, measured by the LHCf experiment

The Latest Results from AMS on the International Space Station

A-Exam: e + e Cosmic Rays and the Fermi Large Array Telescope

PoS(ICRC2017)168. PSD performance and charge reconstruction with DAMPE

Upgrade of ATLAS and CMS for High Luminosity LHC: Detector performance and Physics potential

Upgrade of the CMS Forward Calorimetry

The LHAASO-KM2A detector array and physical expectations. Reporter:Sha Wu Mentor: Huihai He and Songzhan Chen

Kaon Identification at NA62. Institute of Physics Particle, Astroparticle, and Nuclear Physics groups Conference 2015

PEBS - Positron Electron Balloon Spectrometer. Prof. Dr. Stefan Schael I. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH Aachen

Indirect Dark Matter search in cosmic rays. F.S. Cafagna, INFN Bari

P A M E L A Payload for Antimatter / Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics

Lecture 16 Light transmission and optical detectors

SciBar and future K2K physics. F.Sánchez Universitat Aútonoma de Barcelona Institut de Física d'altes Energies

AMS-02 measurement of cosmic ray positrons and electrons

GAMMA-RAY ASTRONOMY: IMAGING ATMOSPHERIC CHERENKOV TECHNIQUE FABIO ZANDANEL - SESIONES CCD

The NUCLEON Space Experiment Preliminary Results. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, , Russia

GLAST Large Area Telescope:

The TIC project: tracking gamma rays with a calorimeter

The SHiP experiment. Colloquia: IFAE A. Paoloni( ) on behalf of the SHiP Collaboration. 1. Introduction

The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

Spacal alignment and calibration

Nikolay Topchiev for the GAMMA-400 Collaboration High-energy gamma-ray studying with GAMMA-400

David Gascón. Daniel Peralta. Universitat de Barcelona, ECM department. E Diagonal 647 (Barcelona) IFAE, Universitat Aut onoma de Barcelona

9/27 JUNE 2003 SUMMER STAGE PARTICLES REVELATION THROUGH CERENKOV AND SCINTILLATION COUNTER AND THE CEBAF EXPERIMENT

PoS(TIPP2014)033. Upgrade of MEG Liquid Xenon Calorimeter. Ryu SAWADA. ICEPP, the University of Tokyo

Measurement of the CR e+/e- ratio with ground-based instruments

PoS(KAON)059. Giuseppe Ruggiero. Scuola Normale Superiore and INFN, Pisa, Italy

1 Introduction STATUS OF THE GLAST LARGE AREA TELESCOPE. SLAC-PUB December Richard Dubois. Abstract

Results from the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam

Measurements of Heavy Nuclei with the CALET Experiment

Antimatter in Space. Mirko Boezio INFN Trieste, Italy. PPC Torino July 14 th 2010

Muon commissioning and Exclusive B production at CMS with the first LHC data

Status of the PAMELA silicon tracker

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

VERITAS Design. Vladimir Vassiliev Whipple Observatory Harvard-Smithsonian CfA

Gamma-Ray Astronomy with a Wide Field of View detector operated at Extreme Altitude in the Southern Hemisphere.

Cosmic Rays and the need for heavy payloads

Appendix A2. Particle Accelerators and Detectors The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland on the Border of France.

READINESS OF THE CMS DETECTOR FOR FIRST DATA

MoonCal An electromagnetic calorimeter on the lunar surface. R.Battiston, M.T.Brunetti, F. Cervelli, C.Fidani, F.Pilo

Non-collision Background Monitoring Using the Semi-Conductor Tracker of ATLAS at LHC

Transcription:

Frascati Physics Series Vol. 58 (2014) Frontier Objects in Astrophysics and Particle Physics May 18-24, 2014 High-energy Gamma Rays detection with the AMS-02 electromagnetic calorimeter F. Pilo for the AMS-02 ECAL Group INFN Sezione di Pisa, Italy Abstract The AMS-02 experiment, operating on the International Space Station since May 2011, is designed for a 10-20 years long mission, studying the fluxes of different cosmic ray components in the high energy range 1-2000 GeV. Identification of electrons, positrons and photons is provided by the Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL), a fine-grained lead-scintillating fibre sampling calorimeter that provides an excellent reconstruction of the electromagnetic shower energy as well as a precise three-dimensional imaging of the longitudinal and lateral shower development. Thanks to the 3D shower reconstruction capability, ECAL allows a standalone determination of the incoming particle direction, with unprecedented angular resolution. The AMS-02 sub-detectors located above the ECAL provide rejection of charged background. As a result, ECAL is able to identify high energy photons coming from galactic and extragalactic sources. The AMS-02 photon detection strategy will be discussed. 284

1 γ-rays dection in AMS-02 Detecting high energy γ-rays, one of the less abundant components of cosmic rays, is a primary task of the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS-02). This general purpose detector operates continuously on the International Space Station (ISS) since May 2011 and aims to identify and measure the spectra of the cosmic rays components with so far unreached precision in the energy window from 1 GeV to a few TeV 1). The core of the experiment, the spectrometer, consists of a silicon tracker inside a permanent magnet determining the momentum of charged particles, and four planes of time of flight counters (TOF), measuring the particle velocity. The particle charge is redundantly measured by the tracker, the TOF and a ring imaging Cerenkov detector (RICH) below the magnet. A transition radiation detector (TRD), located on top of the detector, and an electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL) at the bottom, complete the set of sub-detectors that together provide high capability of discriminating the hadronic component of cosmic rays from the electromagnetic one. (a) (b) Figure 1: a) AMS-02 single photon detection mode. b) Example of background source: π 0 particles generated in interaction of primary protons with the AMS- 02 material. Thanks to the versatile detector configuration, γ-rays can be identified 285

using two independent and mutually exclusive methods. In conversion mode gamma-rays are identified by tracking back the e + e pairs generated in the gamma conversion happened somewhere in the material upstream of the magnet. In single photon mode, the photons are directly detected in the ECAL using all the other sub-detectors located above the calorimeter as a veto to suppress charged backgrounds (see figure 1b for an example of background event). Clearly with this second technique the calorimeter has a key role not only measuring the photon energy, but also determining the incoming particle direction, and generating the trigger for the whole experiment. 2 The electromagnetic calorimeter The sensitive volume of the ECAL consists of a multilayer sandwich of lead foils and scintillating fibers with a square cross section of 648x648 mm 2 and a thickness of 166.5 mm corresponding to 17 radiation lengths 2). The calorimeter is subdivided in nine superlayers, each 18.5 mm thick and made of 11 grooved, 1 mm thick lead foils interleaved with ten layers of 1 mm diameter scintillating fibers. In each superlayer, the fibers run in one direction only. The 3D imaging capability of the detector is obtained by stacking superlayers alternately with fibers parallel to the x and y axes (five and four superlayers, respectively). The fibers are coupled on one end to multi-anode photomultipliers arranged so that the size of the basic light collection area is 9x9 mm 2 giving the detector a very high read-out granularity. The detector commissioning, with the test beam at CERN Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) 3) and the following in-orbit checks, confirmed that the ECAL completely fulfills the design specifications. In particular, the detector shows a very good energy resolution, below 20% for energies above 50 GeV and a deviation from linearity smaller that 1% in the energy range between 8 and 180 GeV, with the major source of non-linearity being the rear energy leakage, an effect that is easily correctable up to the TeV (see Fig. 2b). The angular resolution in the reconstruction of the particle incoming direction is measured in two independent ways: using both data from electron beams and electrons collected during the flight, comparing the direction reconstructed by the tracker with the one estimated by ECAL. In both cases the assumption that a shower initiated by an electron is compatible with a shower initiated by a photon in the ECAL has been verified and eventually corrected 286

(a) (b) Figure 2: a) The ECAL energy resolution measured at test beam. b) The linearity of the detector response, better than 1% for energies up to 180 GeV. using the Monte Carlo experiment simulation. As pointing accuracy is a fundamental figure of merit in γ astrophysics, allowing to discriminate between point sources and diffuse emission, the unique 3D imaging capabilities of the ECAL have been deeply exploited in the development of the algorithms for direction reconstruction. In particular the best results were obtained measuring the position of the shower axis from the fit of the lateral development of the electromagnetic shower. Figure 3a shows the angular resolution defined by the three-dimensional angular opening with respect to the tracker track direction that contains 68% of the events, as a function of energy: it is better than 1 above 40 GeV and slightly improves with the inclination of the incoming particle. Designing the ECAL stand-alone trigger 4), major efforts were spent to recover the efficiency down to the lowest possible energy while containing the acquisition rate and the power consumption. In particular the system has been designed to be almost 100% efficient on high energy deposits (above 10 GeV) and as highly efficient as possible at low energies; to produce a trigger rate below 100 Hz; to have low sensitivity to external conditions (temperature, solar activity...) and high robustness, assuring good performances even in case of a broken PMTs (hot or dead) or of global gain fluctuations; to require a power consumption below 15 Watt and components weight below 5 kg. The basic idea to fulfill all these requirements is to build up a trigger with a granularity of 1 PMT (18x18 mm 2 ). The signals of the last dynode of the PMT s of 287

(a) (b) Figure 3: a) The ECAL 3D angular resolution according to different algorithms of shower axis position reconstruction: the best results are obtained using a parameterization of lateral shower development (LF). b) Standalone trigger efficiency measured on electrons and photons as a function of particle energy. the 6 central superlayers are sent as input to a set of comparators and the outputs combined to produce the first decision level of the trigger, i.e. the fast trigger : usually for each view (x and y) at least 2 (out of 3) superlayers must have at least one photomultiplier above threshold. These thresholds, one for each superlayer, have been optimized using the AMS-02 Monte Carlo to obtain more than 90% efficiency on 2 GeV photons, enhancing the rejection of hadronic background with a longitudinal profile resembling the electromagnetic shower one. If the fast trigger request is satisfied, the incoming particle direction is roughly evaluated by taking, for each view, the average position of the fired PMTs: the angular distance of the barycenters of the 2 most distant superlayers is requested to be inside 20 in order to produce the final trigger decision, the level 1 trigger. This reduces the trigger rate rejecting background particles entering the calorimeter from outside the ECAL field of view. Data taking operations in space demonstrated that the ECAL stand alone trigger, thanks to its flexible configuration and reliable design, can easily accommodate the required performances. The transfer function of the comparators has been reconstructed from flight data showing the correct behavior with an effective applied threshold within a few percent with respect to the design value; only few channels got lost after the launch. To evaluate the trigger efficiency 288

we first use a highly pure electron sample triggered by the TOF and passing inside the detector field of view; then the results have been used to tune the Monte Carlo simulation and to finally estimate the efficiency on photons. This resulted to be completely in agreement with the expectations, being about 80% at 2 GeV and reaching 99% at 10 GeV (see figure 3b). For an average polar orbit the trigger rate is contained in about 120 Hz (approximately 10% of total AMS-02 rate). 3 Photon identification The first step of the photon identification strategy consists in an event preselection requiring the presence of one shower in the ECAL, a reconstructed incoming direction inside the upper TOF plane active area, very low activity in the sub-detectors upstream the calorimeter. Among the remaining candidates the main background source consists of protons and electrons reaching ECAL from the lateral and the rear sides, generating a shower whose axis is wrongly reconstructed: to clearly identify the γ-rays a very high rejection power (of the order of 10 6 ) is required. This is obtained using boosted decision tree (BDT) methods combining the variables describing the 3D electromagnetic shower shape in ECAL with the variables measuring the activity in other AMS sub-detectors, like the energy deposit in the 4 TOF layers, the time difference between the TOF hits closest to shower axis in the four TOF layers, the number of TRD tracks and the minimum TRD track distance from shower axis. Two BDT s classifiers, one to reject electrons and one for protons, were trained separately using both data and Monte Carlo simulations: the photon candidates are finally selected applying tight cuts on both the two estimators as shown in figure 4a. Figure 4b shows the level of background rejection reached applying the full selection algorithm; even considering the feeble flux out of the galactic plane the expected contamination above 30 GeV is lower than 10%: it s possible to look at the high energy gamma sky and search for high energy sources. For the single photon mode detection the corresponding AMS-02 effective area (defined as the surface integral of the detection efficiency as a function of energy and incoming direction) is shown in figure 4c as a function of cosθ, where θ is the particle inclination angle, and log 10 (E/GeV ). 289

(b) (a) (c) Figure 4: a) BDT classifiers applied to photons. Two BDTs trained on electrons and protons are combined in a unique classifier, the BDT radius which defines the circular sector of good candidates. b) The background rate applying the selection procedure. Since the geomagnetic cut-off is not considered, the background is overestimated below 10 GeV. c) The differential effective area as a function of cosθ and log 10 (E/GeV ). 4 Conclusion The AMS-02 electromagnetic calorimeter is an imaging calorimeter operating in space since May 2011. The high granularity guarantees excellent performances for both lepton/hadron separation and pointing. These characteristics, along with the robust and fully configurable standalone trigger, allow the ECAL to directly detect γ particles. By means of accurate discriminant analysis tecniques, the level of background can be sufficently contained, as confirmed by the sky map (see figure 5) obtained with photon candidates applying the correction for the detector exposure. In the map, the galactic plane, as well as the brightest gamma-rays sources like Vela, Geminga, Crab and Cygnus, are clearly visible. In the future, thanks to the very long data taking time foreseen for AMS-02, more results are expected in particular in the investigation of structures in the photon spectrum, where the very good calorimeter energy resolution will play a key role. 290

Figure 5: Gamma all-sky map for energy above 5 GeV in 2 x2 pixels in galactic coordinates. The map is obtained for a period of 24 month of data taking, correcting for the exposure of the instrument (the two empty ovals correspond to regions out of the AMS field of view). References 1. M. Aguilar et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 14 (2013). 2. S. Rosier-Lees et al, J.Phys.Conf.Ser 404 (2012). 3. C. Adloff et al, Nucl.Instrum.Meth A714 (2013). 4. F. Cadoux et al, Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on 55, 2 (2008). 291