Neutrinos: Three-Flavor Effects in Sparse and Dense Matter

Similar documents
Damping signatures in future neutrino oscillation experiments

New index of CP phase effect and θ 13 screening in long baseline neutrino experiments

Introduction to Neutrino Physics

Chart of Elementary Particles

Searching for non-standard interactions at the future long baseline experiments

Neutrino phenomenology Lecture 2: Precision physics with neutrinos

Neutrino Basics. m 2 [ev 2 ] tan 2 θ. Reference: The Standard Model and Beyond, CRC Press. Paul Langacker (IAS) LSND 90/99% SuperK 90/99% MINOS K2K

Overview of mass hierarchy, CP violation and leptogenesis.

Sterile Neutrinos in July 2010

Neutrino Physics II. Neutrino Phenomenology. Arcadi Santamaria. TAE 2014, Benasque, September 19, IFIC/Univ. València

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 5 Jun 2014

The Daya Bay and T2K results on sin 2 2θ 13 and Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions (NSI)

Non oscillation flavor physics at future neutrino oscillation facilities

Identifying the neutrino mass hierarchy with supernova neutrinos

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 8 Apr 2012

SNOW Global fits to neutrino oscillation data. Thomas Schwetz SISSA, Trieste

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 17 Sep 2014

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 23 Jan 2017

COLLIDER STUDIES OF HIGGS TRIPLET MODEL

COLLIDER STUDIES OF HIGGS TRIPLET MODEL

Is nonstandard interaction a solution to the three neutrino tensions?

What If U e3 2 < 10 4? Neutrino Factories and Other Matters

Prospects of Reactor ν Oscillation Experiments

Sterile neutrinos at future long-baseline experiments

Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Oscillation Physics & Prospects for the Future

Flavor oscillations of solar neutrinos

Exact Formula of Probability and CP Violation for Neutrino Oscillations in Matter

Neutrino Physics: an Introduction

The Solar Neutrino Day-Night Effect. Master of Science Thesis Mattias Blennow Division of Mathematical Physics Department of Physics KTH

- Future Prospects in Oscillation Physics -

The future of neutrino physics (at accelerators)

Particle Physics WS 2012/13 ( )

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 19 Jun 2004

The KTY formalism and the neutrino oscillation probability including nonadiabatic contributions. Tokyo Metropolitan University.

Solar spectrum. Nuclear burning in the sun produce Heat, Luminosity and Neutrinos. pp neutrinos < 0.4 MeV

Status of Solar Neutrino Oscillations

Unbound Neutrino Roadmaps. MARCO LAVEDER Università di Padova e INFN NOW September 2006

1 Neutrinos. 1.1 Introduction

Neutrino Anomalies & CEνNS

Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino Oscillation Measurements, Past and Present. Art McDonald Queen s University And SNOLAB

Phenomenology at neutrino oscillation experiments

Solar and atmospheric ν s

Phenomenology of neutrino mixing in vacuum and matter

Long & Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Studies at Intense Proton Sources. Jeff Nelson College of William & Mary

arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 21 Apr 2014

Neutrino Phenomenology. Boris Kayser ISAPP July, 2011 Part 1

Neutrino oscillation phenomenology

Sinergie fra ricerche con neutrini da acceleratore e atmosferici

Neutrino Physics: Lecture 12


Status and prospects of neutrino oscillations

PLAN. Lecture I: Lecture II: Neutrino oscillations and the discovery of neutrino masses and mixings. Lecture III: The quest for leptonic CP violation

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

Neutrinos as a Unique Probe: cm

Neutrinos in Supernova Evolution and Nucleosynthesis

Puzzles of Neutrinos and Anti-Matter: Hidden Symmetries and Symmetry Breaking. Hong-Jian He

Systematic uncertainties in long baseline neutrino oscillations for large θ 13

Status of Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions. Tommy Ohlsson. Department of Theoretical Physics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

Test of Non-Standard Interactions at Super-K

Updating the Status of Neutrino Physics

LONG BASELINE NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENTS

Yang-Hwan, Ahn (KIAS)

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

What We Know, and What We Would Like To Find Out. Boris Kayser Minnesota October 23,

Long baseline experiments

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Complementarity between current and future oscillation experiments

The Leptonic CP Phases

The NOνA Experiment and the Future of Neutrino Oscillations

New Jarlskog Determinant from Physics above the GUT Scale

Sensitivity to sterile ν mixings at a ν Factory --Side business of a ν Factory --

Status of Light Sterile Neutrinos Carlo Giunti

Neutrinos and Cosmos. Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) Texas Conference at Stanford Dec 17, 2004

The history of neutrino oscillations

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 11 Mar 2005

Bimaximal Neutrino Mixing in a Zee-type Model with Badly Broken Flavor Symmetry

Why neutrinos? Patrick Huber. Center for Neutrino Physics at Virginia Tech. KURF Users Meeting June 7, 2013, Virginia Tech. P. Huber VT-CNP p.

Particle Physics: Neutrinos part I

Neutrino Pendulum. A mechanical model for 3-flavor Neutrino Oscillations. Michael Kobel (TU Dresden) PSI,

Neutrino Oscillations

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

Impact of light sterile!s in LBL experiments "

EXPLORING PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE ASYMMETRY IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. Atsuko K. Ichikawa, Kyoto University

Updated three-neutrino oscillation parameters from global fits

Neutrino Physics: Lecture 1

Solar neutrinos and the MSW effect

Overview of Reactor Neutrino

Puzzles of Neutrino Mixing and Anti-Matter: Hidden Symmetries and Symmetry Breaking. Shao-Feng Ge

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 11 Sep 2012

Latest Results from MINOS and MINOS+ Will Flanagan University of Texas on behalf of the MINOS+ Collaboration

Neutrinos From The Sky and Through the Earth

Neutrino oscillation experiments: Recent results and implications

Scaling in the Neutrino Mass Matrix and the See-Saw Mechanism. Werner Rodejohann (MPIK, Heidelberg) Erice, 20/09/09

Flavor Symmetry L e L µ L τ, Atmospheric Neutrino Mixing and CP Violation in the Lepton Sector

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 6 Mar 2014

Neutrino Oscillations

Transcription:

Neutrinos: Three-Flavor Effects in Sparse and Dense Matter Tommy Ohlsson tommy@theophys.kth.se Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) & Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (KVA) Stockholm, Sweden Neutrinos and the Early Universe, ECT*, Trento, Italy October 5, 2004 Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 1/29

Outline Introduction Three-flavor and matter effects Solar day-night effect (sparse matter) Effective neutrino mixing and oscillations in dense matter Summary & Conclusions In collaboration with: Mattias Blennow and Håkan Snellman as well as Evgeny Akhmedov, Robert Johansson, Manfred Lindner, and Thomas Schwetz Based on: hep-ph/0311098 and hep-ph/0409061 as well as hep-ph/0402175 Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 2/29

Introduction Neutrinos were introduced in 1930 by W. Pauli, n p + e + ν e. The first neutrino was detected in 1956 by C.L. Cowan and F. Reines (the electron antineutrino). Neutrinos come in three flavors (ν e, ν µ, and ν τ ). Initially, neutrinos were believed to be massless. Neutrino oscillations were first considered in 1957 by B. Pontecorvo. Neutrino oscillations indicate non-zero neutrino masses (and vice versa). Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 3/29

Two-flavor neutrino oscillations Two flavors: 2 parameters Three flavors: 6 parameters The two-flavor formula (probability for the transition ν α ν β ): P αβ (L/E) = δ αβ (2δ αβ 1) sin 2 2θ sin 2 m2 L, α, β = e, µ, τ. 4E sin 2 2θ: oscillation amplitude m 2 : oscillation frequency L baseline length E neutrino energy For example, if α = β = e or α = e, β = µ, then P ee = 1 sin 2 2θ sin 2 m2 L 4E, P eµ = sin 2 2θ sin 2 m2 L 4E. Note! P ee = 1 P eµ = 1 P µe = P µµ Solar (or reactor) neutrinos: θ := θ 12 and m 2 := m 2 21. Atmospheric neutrinos: θ := θ 23 and m 2 := m 2 31. But: Three-flavor effects 10 % Today: Three flavors a must! Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 4/29

General definitions The leptonic mixing matrix: U = O 23 U δ O 13 U δ O 12 c 12 c 13 s 12 c 13 s 13 e iδ CP = s 12 c 23 c 12 s 13 s 23 e iδ CP c 12 c 23 s 12 s 13 s 23 e iδ CP c 13 s 23, s 12 s 23 c 12 s 13 c 23 e iδ CP c 12 s 23 s 12 s 13 c 23 e iδ CP c 13 c 23 where s ij = sin θ ij and c ij = cos θ ij. Here θ ij is the mixing angle in the ij-plane and δ CP is the CP-violating phase. 3 mixing angles and 1 CP-violating phase. The mass squared differences: m 2 ij = m 2 i m 2 j 3 neutrino flavors: 2 mass squared differences, since m 2 12 + m2 23 + m2 31 = 0. Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 5/29

Phenomenological facts Parameter Best-fit value Range (3σ) m 2 21 8.1 10 5 ev 2 (7.2 9.1) 10 5 ev 2 m 2 31 2.2 10 3 ev 2 (1.4 3.3) 10 3 ev 2 θ 12 33.2 28.7 38.1 θ 13 0 0 12.5 θ 23 45.0 35.7 55.6 δ CP - 0 2π (M. Maltoni et al., hep-ph/0309130; hep-ph/0405172) Bilarge leptonic mixing, i.e., θ 12 and θ 23 are large and θ 13 is small. Note! Leptons (MNS): 2 large mixing angles and 1 small mixing angle Quarks (CKM): 3 small mixing angles Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 6/29

Three-flavor effects, matter effects, and notation If any of the elements U αa of the leptonic mixing matrix U or any of the mass squared differences equals zero (e.g. θ 13 0 or α 0), then one has effective two-flavor scenarios. Three-flavor effects: P 3fe αβ P 3ν αβ P 2ν αβ If V 0, then one has vacuum scenarios. Matter effects: Sparse matter : Dense matter : P me αβ P matter αβ 2EV/ m 2 1 2EV/ m 2 1 P vacuum αβ Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 7/29

Effective two-flavor formulas Amplitudes and frequencies: P αβ sin 2 2θ m 2 θ 13 = 0 P ee sin 2 2θ 12 m 2 21 P eµ = P µe c 2 23 sin2 2θ 12 m 2 21 P eτ = P τe s 2 23 sin2 2θ 12 m 2 21 α = 0 P eµ s 2 23 sin2 2θ 13 m 2 31 = m2 32 P µτ c 4 13 sin2 2θ 23 m 2 31 = m2 32 θ 13 0: E.g. oscillations of anti-electron neutrinos from reactor experiments (KamLAND) α 0: E.g. oscillations of atmospheric neutrinos (Super-Kamiokande) Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 8/29

Neutrino evolution The Schrödinger equation for the neutrino vector of state in the flavor basis: with the effective Hamiltonian i d ν(t) = H ν(t) dt H 1 2E U diag(0, m2 21, m 2 31)U + diag(v, 0,0). The potential V (x) is given by ( ) ρ(x) V (x) 7.56 10 14 g/cm 3 Y e (x) }{{} 1/2 ev, where ρ(x) is the matter density. Earth s crust: ρ crust 3 g/cm 3 Earth s mantle: ρ mantle 4.5 g/cm 3 Antineutrinos: U U and V V Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 9/29

Neutrino oscillation probabilities In general: 3 neutrino flavors 18 neutrino and antineutrino oscillation probabilities I. Antineutrinos: Pᾱ β = P αβ (δ CP δ CP, V V ) 9 neutrino oscillation probabilities II. Unitarity (conservation of probability): α P αβ = β P αβ = 1 5 of the 9 neutrino oscillation probabilities can be expressed in the other 4 III. µ τ symmetry: Pαβ P αβ (s 2 23 c2 23, sin2θ 23 sin 2θ 23 ) P eτ = P eµ, P τµ = P µτ, P ττ = P µµ Out of these 3 conditions, only 2 are independent (unitarity) 2 independent neutrino oscillation probabilities We will use P eµ and P µτ! (E. Akhmedov, R. Johansson, M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson, and T. Schwetz, hep-ph/0402175) Useful abbreviations: m2 31 L 4E, A 2EV m 2 31 = V L 2. Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 10/29

Series expansions of neutrino oscillation probabilities Neutrino oscillation probabilities [P αβ P(ν α ν β )]: P αβ = P αβ ( m 2 21, m 2 31, θ 12, θ 13, θ 23, δ CP ;E, L, V (x)), α, β = e, µ, τ, where E is the neutrino energy, L is the baseline length, and V (x) is the matter induced effective potential, x [0, L]. Different types of expansions: α expansion: Single series expansion up to first order in α s 13 expansion: Single series expansion up to first order in s 13 Double expansion: Series expansion up to second order in both α and s 13 Expansion parameters: α m2 21 m 2 31 0.026 and θ 13 10.8 s 13 0.19 Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 11/29

Double expansion Neutrino oscillation probabilities in constant matter density: P ee = 1 α 2 sin 2 2θ 12 sin 2 A A 2 4 s 2 13 sin 2 (A 1) (A 1) 2, P eµ = α 2 sin 2 2θ 12 c 2 23 sin 2 A A 2 + 4 s 2 13 s 2 sin 2 (A 1) 23 (A 1) 2 + 2 α s 13 sin 2θ 12 sin2θ 23 cos( δ CP ) sin A A sin(a 1) A 1, P µτ = sin 2 2θ 23 sin 2 α c 2 12 sin 2 2θ 23 sin 2 + α 2 c 4 12 sin 2 2θ 23 2 cos 2 1 ( 2A α2 sin 2 2θ 12 sin 2 sin A 2θ 23 sin cos(a 1) ) A 2 sin 2 + 2 ( sin(a 1) A 1 s2 13 sin2 2θ 23 sin cos A A ) A 1 2 sin 2 + 2 α s 13 sin 2θ 12 sin2θ 23 sin δ CP sin sin A 2 A 1 α s 13 sin 2θ 12 sin2θ 23 cos 2θ 23 cos δ CP sin A sin(a 1) A 1 ( Asin sin A A ) cos(a 1). Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 12/29

Double expansion II In vacuum (i.e., A 0): P vac ee = 1 α 2 sin 2 2θ 12 2 4 s 2 13 sin2, P vac eµ = α 2 sin 2 2θ 12 c 2 23 2 + 4 s 2 13 s 2 23 sin 2 + 2 α s 13 sin2θ 12 sin2θ 23 cos( δ CP ) sin, Pµτ vac = sin 2 2θ 23 sin 2 α c 2 12 sin 2 2θ 23 sin2 + α 2 sin 2 2θ 23 (c 2 4 12 cos 2 1 ) 2 sin2 2θ 12 sin 2 2 s 2 13 sin 2 2θ 23 sin 2 + 2 α s 13 sin2θ 12 sin2θ 23 (sin δ CP sin cos 2θ 23 cos δ CP cos ) sin. Other works: A. Cervera et al., hep-ph/0002108. M. Freund, hep-ph/0103300. M. Freund, P. Huber, and M. Lindner, hep-ph/0105071. V. Barger, D. Marfatia, and K. Whisnant, hep-ph/0112119. Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 13/29

Solar day-night effect SUN Neutrino production N EARTH D Day at detector Night at detector D day rate of solar neutrinos N night rate of solar neutrinos The Sun in neutrino light. The Sun seen in ES detection of neutrinos. Is it brighter at night than at day? Are the rates D and N different? Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 14/29

Solar day-night effect II Flux of solar ν e depleted due to neutrino oscillations. What is the influence of the Earth on neutrino oscillations? The day-night asymmetry: A n d = 2 N D N + D c2 13, where N and D are night and day neutrino rates, respectively. The asymmetry is a measure of the effect. We study this effect in a three neutrino flavor framework. In the future: Determination of the mixing angle θ 13 as an alternative to super-beams, future reactor experiments, and neutrino factories. Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 15/29

Analytical approach Approximation: Earth is a sphere of constant density. For the neutrino energies used, the third mass eigenstate is hardly affected by the presence of matter in the Sun and Earth. The difference between the night and day survival probabilities is: (P D c 4 13 ) P N P D 2c 6 13D 3ν EV E m 2 sin2 (2θ 12 ) sin 2 ( ) m 2 4E L c 6 13, (M. Blennow, T. Ohlsson, and H. Snellman, hep-ph/0311098) where V E is the effective ν e potential arising from interactions with matter and D 3ν = R 0 dr f(r) cos[2ˆθ 12 (r)]. Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 16/29

Numerical calculation (Super-Kamiokande) The day-night asymmetry numerically calculated with our analytical approach (for ES detection at the Super-Kamiokande experiment): -3-3.5 θ 13 = 0 θ 13 = 9.2 o θ 13 = 12 o 0 log( m 2 /ev 2 ) -4-4.5 0.005 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09-5 90% CL 95% CL 99% CL 99.73% CL 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 sin 2 θ 12 (M. Blennow, T. Ohlsson, and H. Snellman, hep-ph/0311098) Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 17/29

Numerical calculation (SNO) The day-night asymmetry numerically calculated with our analytical approach (for CC detection at the SNO experiment): -3-3.5 θ 13 = 0 θ 13 = 9.2 o θ 13 = 12 o 0 0.005 0.01 log( m 2 /ev 2 ) -4-4.5 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09-5 90% CL 95% CL 99% CL 99.73% CL 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 sin 2 θ 12 (M. Blennow, T. Ohlsson, and H. Snellman, hep-ph/0311098) Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 18/29

Another analytical approach An approximate analytic expression for the day-night effect valid for an arbitrary matter density profile of the Earth. The neutrino potential in the Earth V is small (V/2δ 0.05). It can be considered as a perturbation. Use the technique from hep-ph/0402175. The night-day probability difference is: P N P D = (Pe2 P e1 )(P 2e P (0) 2e ) = c2 13 cos 2ˆθ 12 (P2e P (0) 2e ), P 2e P (0) 2e = c4 13 sin 2 2θ 12 1 2 L Constant matter density (i.e., V = const.) 0 dx V (x) sin[2δ(l x)]. P N P D = c 6 13 cos 2ˆθ 12 sin 2 2θ 12 V δ 2ω 2 sin2 ωl. (E. Akhmedov, M. Tórtola, and J. Valle, hep-ph/0404083) Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 19/29

What can one learn about θ 13 from A n d? 0.05 0.05 0.04 SK 1σ region σ = 25% σ SK σ = 10% σ SK 0.04 σ = 25% σ SK σ = 10% σ SK 0.03 0.03 A ND 0.02 A ND 0.02 0.01 0.01 0 0-0.01 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 cos 2 θ 13 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 cos 2 θ 13-0.01 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 cos 2 θ 13 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 cos 2 θ 13 (E. Akhmedov, M. Tórtola, and J. Valle, hep-ph/0404083) At present: Experimental errors too large In the future: UNO and Hyper-Kamiokande Constant matter density: M. Blennow, T. Ohlsson, and H. Snellman Arbitrary matter density: E. Akhmedov, M. Tórtola, and J. Valle Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 20/29

Neutrino oscillations in sparse matter Two-flavor neutrino oscillations in low-density medium: V (x) m2 2E, Small parameter: i.e., potential kinetic energy ǫ(x) 2EV (x) m 2 1 perturbation theory in ǫ(x) Useful for solar and supernova neutrinos. (A. Ioannisian and A. Smirnov, hep-ph/0404060; A. Ioannisian, N. Kazarian, A. Smirnov, and D. Wyler, hep-ph/0407138) (Cf. talk by A. Smirnov) Neutrino oscillations in dense matter: 2EV m 2 1 Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 21/29

Mixing and oscillations in dense matter The Hamiltonian in matter: 0 0 0 V 0 0 H = m2 31 2E U 0 α 0 U + 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 }{{}}{{} kinetic term H k interaction term H m When 2EV m 2 31 ( dense matter): H k perturbation to H m. H m has two degenerate eigenvectors degenerate perturbation theory degenerate sector of H m spanned by ν µ = (0, 1, 0) T and ν τ = (0, 0, 1) T H d = ( ) a b b d H = m2 4E ( cos 2θ sin2θ sin2θ cos 2θ ) Here a, b, and d depend on the fundamental neutrino parameters as well as E and V. Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 22/29

Effective two-flavor neutrino parameters The effective mixing angle and mass squared difference in dense matter: sin 2 (2θ ) = 4 b 2 (a d) 2 + 4 b 2 = 4 {s 23c 23 [c 2 13 α(c2 12 s2 12 s2 13 )] αs 12c 12 s 13 c δ cos 2θ 23 } 2 + α 2 s 2 δ s2 12 c2 12 s2 13 [c 2 13 α(c2 12 s2 13 s2 12 )]2 + 4αc 2, 12 s2 12 s2 13 m 2 = 2E (a d) 2 + 4 b 2 = m 2 31 c 4 13 2αc2 13 (c2 12 s2 13 s2 12 ) + α2 (1 c 2 13 s2 12 )2 = m 2 31 [c 2 13 α(c2 12 s2 13 s2 12 )]2 + 4αc 2 12 s2 12 s2 13. (M. Blennow and T. Ohlsson, hep-ph/0409061) Note! θ 13 = 0 or α = 0 θ θ 23 and m 2 m 2 32 For reasonable values of the fundamental neutrino parameters: θ θ 23 Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 23/29

The ratio m 2 / m 2 32 as a function of θ 13 1.05 m 2 / m 32 2 1.00 0.95 α = -0.06 α = -0.04 α = -0.02 α = 0 α = 0.02 α = 0.04 α = 0.06 0.9 0 5 10 15 θ 13 [ o ] The sign of the correction to the approximation m 2 = m 2 32 depends on θ 13 and α. If m 2 and m 2 32 measured, then valuable information on the mass hierarchy (sign of α) and θ 13. Note! For α 0 There is a value of θ 13 : m 2 = m 2 32 Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 24/29

Effective neutrino parameters in matter Antineutrinos Neutrinos Angle [ o ] 90 45 ~ θ ~ 13 θ 23 ~ θ ~ 12 θ oo 90 45 Mass Squared Difference [ev 2 ] 0 0.002 0.001 0 1e-2 1e-2 1e-4 EV [ev 2 ] 1e-4 EV [ev 2 ] 1e-6 ~ 2 m 21 ~ 2 m 32 ~ 2 m oo 1e-6 0 0.002 0.001 0 1e-6 1e-4 1e-2 EV [ev 2 ] 1e-6 1e-4 1e-2 EV [ev 2 ] Three different regions for EV : 2EV m 2 21 (left): {fundamental neutrino parameters} {vacuum neutrino parameter} 2EV m 2 21 (middle): resonance phenomena 2EV m 2 21 (right): two-flavor mixing between ν µ and ν τ (ν e eigenstate to the Hamiltonian) Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 25/29

The relative accuracy of the approximation EV c 13 m2 31 2EV 1 4 sin2 2θ 13 2αs 2 13 c2 13 s2 12 + α2 c 2 13 s2 12 (c2 12 + c2 13 s2 12 ) Neutrino oscillation channel 1 P µµ : LBL exps. and ν-factories 15 < 0.25 % < < 0.5 % < < 1 % 15 < 0.25 % < < 0.5 % < < 1 % 10 10 θ 13 [ o ] θ 13 [ o ] 5 5 0-3 -2-1 0-3 -2-1 log(ve / 1 ev 2 ) log(ve / 1 ev 2 ) L/E = 7000 km/50 GeV L/E = 3000 km/50 GeV (M. Blennow and T. Ohlsson, hep-ph/0409061) Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 26/29

Open questions in neutrino physics Are neutrinos Dirac or Majorana particles? Are there sterile neutrinos? MiniBooNE will most probably have the answer. What is the sign of m 31? Normal or inverted mass hierarchy? What is the value of θ 13? Upper limit from the CHOOZ experiment exists. Is there CP violation in the leptonic sector? What is the value of δ CP? So far, we do not know anything about δ CP. What is the absolute neutrino mass scale? What are the symmetries? θ 23 = π/4 (maximal atmospheric mixing)? θ 12 + θ 13 = π/4 or θ 12 + θ C = π/4? Here θ C is the Cabibbo angle. Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 27/29

Summary & Conclusions A complete handbook of neutrino oscillation formulas have been developed. (hep-ph/0402175) The series expansions for the neutrino oscillation probabilities can be used to better understand neutrino oscillation physics. The solar day-night effect has been studied analytically with three neutrino flavors. (hep-ph/0311098) The solar day-night effect can maybe (in the future) be used to determine the mixing angle θ 13. Effective neutrino mixing and oscillations have been studied in the approximation EV (dense matter). (hep-ph/0409061) This could provide valuable information on the mass hierarchy and the mixing angle θ 13. Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 28/29

References E. Akhmedov, R. Johansson, M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson, and T. Schwetz, JHEP 04, 078 (2004), hep-ph/0402175. M. Blennow, T. Ohlsson, and H. Snellman, Phys. Rev. D 69, 073006 (2004), hep-ph/0311098. E. Akhmedov, M. Tórtola, and J. Valle, JHEP 05, 057 (2004), hep-ph/0404083. M. Blennow and T. Ohlsson, hep-ph/0409061. Tommy Ohlsson - ECT*, October 4-8, 2004 p. 29/29