HARD ROCK TBMs. Levent Ozdemir. Tunneling Consultant

Similar documents
Hard Rock TBM Tunneling Technical Developments and Recent Experience

TBM "Boreability" in Hard Rock

Comparative study of TBM performance prediction models

TBM FOR MINING APPLICATIONS

Geotechnical considerations on TBM tunneling in rock mass

GEOTECHNICAL CONTROL DURING THE EXCAVATION OF THE TUNNEL OF GUADARRAMA

H A R D R O C K T B M D E S I G N F E AT U R E S F O R D I F F I C U LT G R O U N D C O N D I T I O N S. Tyler Sandell The Robbins Company

Pressurised TBMs and their interaction with weathered rock. Nick Shirlaw

Logistics and Performance of a Large-Diameter Crossover TBM for the Akron Ohio Canal Interceptor Tunnel

Underground Excavation Design Classification

10. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROGRAM

NNN99. Rock Engineering for the Next Very Large Underground Detector. D. Lee Petersen CNA Consulting Engineers

Influence of rock mass properties on TBM penetration rate in Karaj-Tehran water conveyance tunnel

Session 3: Geology and Rock Mechanics Fundamentals

A Statistical Model for Prediction TBM Performance using Rock Mass Characteristics in the TBM Driven Alborz Tunnel Project

Using Tunnel Boring Machine Penetration Tests to Quantify Performance in Hard Rock

Boring with no. 3 EPB TBMs in chaotic Lahar formations under variable cover

Stress and Wear Analysis of the Disc Cutter of Rock Tunnel Boring Machine

Kishanganga hydroelectric project (J&K India) head race tunnel tunneling by Tbm under Himalaya mountains dealing with adverse conditions

ROADHEADER IN TUNNELING TODAY S STATE-OF-THE-ART-ROADHEADER

NZQA unit standard New US6 to replace and version 1 Page 1 of 5

Horizontal Directional Drilling: An Approach to Design and Construction. Presenter: John Briand, PE Co-Author: Danielle Neamtu, PE

Rock Material. Chapter 3 ROCK MATERIAL HOMOGENEITY AND INHOMOGENEITY CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK MATERIAL

Boring Hard, Abrasive Gneiss with a Main Beam TBM at the Atlanta Water Supply Program

Real-time prediction during TBM advance.

JME Journal of Mining & Environment, Vol.3, No.2, 2012,

Excavating Turkey s Most Challenging Project: The Gerede Water Transmission Tunnel

TBM erection chamber HALLANDSÅS TUNNELS. Mid-adit. Hallandsås ridge. Probe hole. 06 June 2009

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Statistical Analysis on Field Penetration Index in Shield TBM

ROCK MASS PROPERTIES FOR TUNNELLING

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND ROCK ENGINEERING

Site Investigations and Geotechnical Risk For Underground Construction Greg Raines, PE

This chapter introduces the description of the surface interaction mechanism based on the friction, wear and excavation laws.

Fracture pattern of anisotropic rock by drilling or cutting using the PFC

ISTANBUL STRAIT ROAD TUBE CROSSING

Swelling Pressure Due to volumetric Expansion of a rock mass having swelling minerals when comes in contact with water

SYLLABUS AND REFERENCES FOR THE STRATA CONTROL CERTIFICATE COAL MINING OPTION

Suitability of Brisbane Rock Conditions to Roadheader Excavation

Geology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 7. Rocks and Concrete as Engineering Material (West, Ch. 6)

Analysis of Soil Machine Interactions (Part 1): Processing of TBM-Machine-Data and Extraction of excavation-specific Data

GIBE II TUNNEL PROJECT - ETHIOPIA - 40 BARS OF MUD ACTING ON THE TBM

Design and Implementation of a Large-Diameter, Dual-Mode Crossover TBM for the Akron Ohio Canal Interceptor Tunnel

WEIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. Mining, Geology and Energy Consultants

SYLLABUS AND REFERENCES FOR THE STRATA CONTROL CERTIFICATE. METALLIFEROUS MINING OPTION Updated November 1998

STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF ROCKS AND ROCK MASSES 4. FAILURE CRITERIA FOR INTACT ROCKS AND ROCK MASSES

An introduction to the Rock Mass index (RMi) and its applications

COMPARING THE RMR, Q, AND RMi CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: CERTIFICATE IN ROCK MECHANICS PAPER 1 : THEORY SUBJECT CODE: COMRMC MODERATOR: H YILMAZ EXAMINATION DATE: OCTOBER 2017 TIME:

POSTER PAPER PROCEEDINGS

Evaluation of TBM performance in a Himalayan tunnel

Geotechnical Monitoring for Safe Excavation of Large Rock Cavern: A Case Study

The Tunnel Boring Machine Advancements in Horizontal and Up-Hill Tunnels

Olympic Games 2014 transportation system The TBM tunnelling story

Coal Mining Methods. Underground Mining. Longwall & Room and Pillar Mining. Fig. 1: Longwall Mining

Strata Control in Shale Roof- A Case Study of Tummalapalle Uranium Mine

TBM performance prediction in basalt and pyroclastic rocks of Deccan traps, a case study of Maroshi-Ruparel water supply tunnel

PREDICTION OF CUTTER WEAR USING RME

Punch Penetration Tests The Better Input Parameter for TBM Performance Prediction?

Building on Past Experiences Worker Safety

Performance Prediction Models for Hard Rock Tunnel Boring Machines

Deep tunnelling in hardrock with large diameter TBM: What s up? An experience from the Gotthard Base Tunnel

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND ROCK MECHANICS

GROUND RESPONSE AND SUPPORT MEASURES FOR PIR PANJAL TUNNEL IN THE HIMALAYAS

ORAL PAPER PROCEEDINGS

Geological evidences of collapse zones in TBM tunneling; a case study of Ghomroud water conveyance tunnel, IRAN

Rock Mechanical Aspects of Roadheader Excavation

Three-Dimensional simulation for the rock fragmentation induced by TBM with GFEM

Simulation of the cutting action of a single PDC cutter using DEM

Waterview Connection Tunnels

Experimental Assessment of Rock Cutting Characteristics by Strength-Driven Mechanism. H Munoz, A Taheri & E Chanda

7. Foundation and Slope Stability

Quantitative Classification of Rock Mass

Structurally controlled instability in tunnels

Use of the underground in Norway

AF SERIES AWEA MECHANTRONIC CO., LTD. High Performance Vertical Machining Center AGENT ISO 9001 ISO 14001

Soil abrasiveness for TBM along Tabriz metro tunnel line 2, Iran

New hydro-mechanical tunnel excavation method using an abrasive waterjet system

II Engineering & hydrogeologic characteriskcs of rocks: general trends

STONE. What is Dimension Stone? 3/23/17

Notes Week 1 Engineering Geology Problems

Determination of stope geometry in jointed rock mass at Pongkor Underground Gold Mine

Rock slope rock wedge stability

ANALYSIS OF FIELD TEST RESULTS FOR THE OIL SHALE MINE VENTILATION SIMULATION

Using EMDS for CLs Mapping and Assessment: SE Demo Project. Keith Reynolds, USDA Forest Service Tim Sullivan, E&S Environmental Tim Lewis, U.S.

Numerical simulation of rock cutting using 2D AUTODYN

EXAMINATION PAPER MEMORANDUM

Considering Creep Parameters of Rock Mass to Evaluate the Necessity Thrust for Excavation in Squeezing Ground

Behaviour of Blast-Induced Damaged Zone Around Underground Excavations in Hard Rock Mass Problem statement Objectives

Numerical study on Optimization of key parameters for better cutting performance of shield machine cutters

Critical Borehole Orientations Rock Mechanics Aspects

Experimental Researches on Friction Coefficient for Disc Cutters

Extreme Excavation in Fault Zones and Squeezing Ground at the Kargi HEPP in Turkey

Tunnel Boring Machines Hong Kong. Dr. Ian McFeat-Smith & Odd G. Askilsrud, PE

Weak Rock - Controlling Ground Deformations

Discrete/Finite Element Modelling of Rock Cutting with a TBM Disc Cutter

Ground support modelling involving large ground deformation: Simulation of field observations Part 1

EXPERIENCES FROM THE GROUND PROBING IN THE GOTTHARD-BASE TUNNEL AND THEIR APPLICABILITY IN THE GIBRALTAR STRAIT CROSSING

Moglicë HPP - Albania. Jorge Terron

Innovative Blast Free Mining Methods for Aggregate Quarries " Ramesh Bhatawdekar, Edy Tonnizam Mohamad, Firdaus Azlan Department of Geoteknik and Tran

Transcription:

HARD ROCK TBMs Levent Ozdemir Tunneling Consultant

HARD ROCK TBM TYPES Main-Beam (open, gripper) Single Shield Double Shield

MAIN-BEAM HARD ROCK TBM

MAIN-BEAM HARD ROCK TBM

SINGLE SHIELD CROSS-SECTION

SINGLE SHIELD TBM

DOUBLE-SHIELD CROSS-SECTION 2 3 1

DOUBLE-SHIELD TBM

COMPARISON BETWEEN HARD ROCK TBM TYPES Single shield Double shield Open type For the poorest ground condition Used with pre-cast segments (required for thrust reaction) Pro s Relatively inexpensive Crew not exposed to rock Short shield, less prone to trapping Better steering ability No need of shotcrete Con s Slow advance rates Cyclic operation since machine forces are reacted via tunnel lining (cut/ring build) For poor to medium quality rock May be used with or without pre-cast segments Crew not exposed to rock Can erect lining while boring High advance rates Can operate as a Single Shield in poor ground Expensive Prone to becoming stuck in high overburden Large turn radius Large thrust force required (due to shield friction) For medium to high quality rock, gripper reaction needed to advance machine High advance rates Tight turn radius Inexpensive Easy mob/demob. Crew more exposed to rock Gripper pressure (~4MPa)

TBM SELECTION Very poor rock RQD <25% Poor rock RQD 25-50% Fair rock RQD 50-75% Good rock RQD 75-90% Very good rock RQD 90-100%

EXCAVATION BY HARD ROCK TBMS

DISC CUTTER COMPONENTS

TBM CUTTING FACE

DISC CUTTING

CHIPS GENERATED BY DISC CUTTERS

DISC CUTTER DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Cutter Diameter (in) Cutter Load (lbs.) Year Introduced 13 20,000 1980 14 30,000 1976 15.5 45,000 1973 17 60,000 1983 19 70,000 1989

WHY USE BIGGER CUTTERS?

CUTTER WEAR AND REPLACEMENT

NORMAL WEAR VERY HARD ABRASIVE ROCK

CHIPPING

MECHANICAL FAILURES BLOCKED CUTTERS, BAD BEARINGS OR SEALS

HARD FACING OF DISC CUTTER RINGS (HERRENKNECHT)

CUTTER CHANGE OPERATION

CUTTER CHANGE OPERATION

CUTTER INSTRUMENTATION ( Cutter RPM, temperature and Vibration)

TBM BACKUP SYSTEM Energy supply Transformer Electrical cabinets Cable drum Hydraulic systems Compressed air system TBM operation & guidance systems TBM operators station Laser guidance system Ventilation Main ventilation air ducts Dust suppression system Air cooler Safety system Unobstructed walkways Work platforms Emergency rescue cabin Fire suppression system Fire/gas detection system Rock support Segment/ring erector Segment storage Grouting Drill equipment Material transport Conveyor belt Belt storage and extension Temporary muck storage

MUCK TRANSPORTATION (BELT CONVEYOR) Tunnel Conveyor Installation Tunnel Conveyor

MUCK TRANSPORTATION (RAIL HAULAGE)

TBM ASSEMBLY

PORTAL ASSEMBLY

UNDERGROUND ASSEMBLY

NIAGARA TUNNEL PROJECT ON-SITE ASSEMBLY (OFTA)

COMPLETED TBM ASSEMBLY NIAGARA TUNNEL PROJECT

GROUND SUPPORT

ROCK BOLTING

Wire Mesh Erector WIRE MESH

SHOTCRETE ROBOT

Wire Mesh Erector as Steel Support Erector STEEL SUPPORT Ring Beams

PRE-CAST SEGMENTAL LINING

PRE-EXCAVATION GROUTING

PROBE DRILLING AND PRE-EXCAVATION GROUTING

TBM PERFORMANCE PREDICTION TBM Predictor Model University of Trondheim (NTNU) Model Proprietary Models by Manufacturers

TBM PERFORMANCE PREDICTION AR = ROP x Utilization x Total shift hours AR: Daily advance rate (ft/day) ROP: Rate of Penetration (ft/hr) CL = Cutter life (cubic yards per cutter change)

TBM PREDICTOR MODEL ROCK DATA Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) Brazilian (Indirect) Tensile Strength (BTS) Cerchar Abrasivity Index (CAI) Punch Penetration Index

UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (ASTM D2938-95) Non-structural Failure Structural Failure BEFORE AFTER BEFORE AFTER

BRAZILIAN TENSILE STRENGTH (ASTM D3967-95) Normal Failure Structural Failure T Tensile Strength (psi) F Failure Load (lbs.) L Thickness of the disk (in.) D Diameter of the disk (in.) Effect of Foliation on Tensile Strength

PUNCH PENETRATION TEST

CERCHAR ABRASIVITY TEST Cerchar Abrasivity Index (CAI) has proven to be fairly accurate and is commonly used for cutter life estimation. A series of sharp 90 hardened pins of heat-treated alloy steel are pulled across a freshly broken surface of the rock. The average dimensions of the resultant wear flats are related directly to cutter life in field operation. The geometry of the planned excavation then allows calculation of the expected cutter costs per unit volume of material. 10 CAI 0.0254 d i 1 i

CERCHAR Abrasivity Index (CAI) for various rocks Quartzite 5.9 Norway Rock type CAI Location Shale 0.9 New York Shale 1.1 Ohio Limestone 1.1 Illinois Barea Sandstone 1.2 Ohio Indiana Limestone 1.3 Indiana Phyllite 1.3 Norway Mica Schist 2.2 Washington, D.C. Andesite 2.3 Arizona Quartz Diorite 3.2 Norway Red Sandstone 3.6 Kentucky Anphibolite 3.6 Norway Gabbro 3.7 Norway Granediorite 3.9 North Carolina Granite 4.0 Sweden Diorite 4.1 North Carolina Gneiss 4.1 Georgia Quartz Gneiss 4.3 Georgia Quartzite 4.3 East Africa Gneiss 4.4 Norway Sandstone 4.7 Kentucky Quartz Gneiss 4.8 Norway Granite Gneiss 4.8 Norway Mica Schist 5.3 New York

DISC CUTTER LIFE vs.cerchar INDEX

TBM MODEL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Cutter wear Brittleness Petrographic features (suturing/interlocking) Foliation/bedding Porosity Joints/fissures

USES OF TBM PREDICTOR MODEL Develop estimates of TBM penetration rates Develop estimates of cutter life and costs Evaluate different TBM proposals Develop specs for ideal TBM for a project Evaluate different size cutters for ROP and life Optimize TBM performance

CAUSES OF REDUCED ROP AND/OR HIGHER CUTTER WEAR Rock is harder/tougher and/or more abrasive than anticipated Less and/or adverse jointing, bedding and foliation than anticipated Cutterhead design, cutter layout, stability, steering, vibration, etc. TBM operation at reduced capacity-lower cutter load Optimistic TBM performance estimates

WORLD TBM RECORDS - PERFORMANCE Indianapolis Deep Rock Tunnel ( 20.2 ft. diam., 7.6 mile long, limestone/dolomite) Be st day = 410 ft Be st week = 169 0 ft Be st Mont h = 5755 ft.

WORLD TBM RECORDS LONGEST TUNNEL Gotthard Base Tunnel, Switzerland

LIMMERN PUMP STORAGE TUNNEL 5.2 M. Hard Rock TBM 40 degree incline Double anti-reverse lock system

DELAWARE AQUEDUCT BYPASS TUNNEL

DELAWARE AQUEDUCT BYPASSTUNNEL Reach 1-2,560lf Sha le (Normanski ll For m at i on ) Reach 2-3,900lf Limestone & Do lo m i te (Wappi ng er Formati on ) Reach 3 3,500lf Limestone & Do lo m i te (Wappi ng er Formati on ) Reach 4 2,540lf Sha le (M ou nt Merin o Formati on )

Muck chute closure doors for controlling high water inflows

THANK YOU Levent Ozdemir