Conical Intersections. Spiridoula Matsika

Similar documents
Conical Intersections: Electronic Structure,Dynamics and Spectroscopy, Yarkony eds. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, (2004) 1/20/2006 1

Conical Intersections, nonadiabatic couplings with applications to chemical physics

An Introduction to Quantum Chemistry and Potential Energy Surfaces. Benjamin G. Levine

Supporting Information. I. A refined two-state diabatic potential matrix

Diatomic Molecules. 7th May Hydrogen Molecule: Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

The Relativistic Jahn-Teller Effect

Wavepacket Correlation Function Approach for Nonadiabatic Reactions: Quasi-Jahn-Teller Model

2. The Schrödinger equation for one-particle problems. 5. Atoms and the periodic table of chemical elements

CHEM3023: Spins, Atoms and Molecules

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE. The general molecular Schrödinger equation, apart from electron spin effects, is. nn ee en

What s the correct classical force on the nuclei

(1/2) M α 2 α, ˆTe = i. 1 r i r j, ˆV NN = α>β

Introduction to Computational Chemistry

Molecular Dynamics. Park City June 2005 Tully

Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

Outline. Escaping the Double Cone: Describing the Seam Space with Gateway Modes. Columbus Workshop Argonne National Laboratory 2005

How to make the Born-Oppenheimer approximation exact: A fresh look at potential energy surfaces and Berry phases

Project: Vibration of Diatomic Molecules

VALENCE Hilary Term 2018

23 The Born-Oppenheimer approximation, the Many Electron Hamiltonian and the molecular Schrödinger Equation M I

When are electrons fast and are Born and Oppenheimer correct?

Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

Treatment of Jahn-Teller and pseudo-jahn-teller effects

Ab initio Molecular Dynamics Born Oppenheimer and beyond

Exact factorization of the electron-nuclear wave function and the concept of exact forces in MD

Ab initio molecular dynamics: Basic Theory and Advanced Met

Electronic transitions: Vibrational and rotational structure

Resonant enhanced electron impact dissociation of molecules

How to make the Born-Oppenheimer approximation exact: A fresh look at potential energy surfaces and Berry phases

Quantum Dynamics of Electronically Excited Molecules: Current Developments and Future Challenges

Electron States of Diatomic Molecules

Jahn-Teller conical intersection

BEYOND BORN-OPPENHEIMER: Molecular Dynamics Through a Conical Intersection

Lecture 10. Born-Oppenheimer approximation LCAO-MO application to H + The potential energy surface MOs for diatomic molecules. NC State University

Chem 442 Review for Exam 2. Exact separation of the Hamiltonian of a hydrogenic atom into center-of-mass (3D) and relative (3D) components.

AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM CHEMISTRY. Mark S. Gordon Iowa State University

ICCP Project 2 - Advanced Monte Carlo Methods Choose one of the three options below

Quantum Mechanical Operators and Wavefunctions. Orthogonality of Wavefunctions. Commuting Operators have Common Eigenfunctions

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

IV. Electronic Spectroscopy, Angular Momentum, and Magnetic Resonance

CHEM3023: Spins, Atoms and Molecules

Yingwei Wang Computational Quantum Chemistry 1 Hartree energy 2. 2 Many-body system 2. 3 Born-Oppenheimer approximation 2

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

Solid State Theory: Band Structure Methods

Multiple conical intersections and multi-state nonadiabatic dynamics in benzenoid cations

2m 2 Ze2. , where δ. ) 2 l,n is the quantum defect (of order one but larger

Chemistry 3502/4502. Exam III. All Hallows Eve/Samhain, ) This is a multiple choice exam. Circle the correct answer.

Ab initio molecular dynamics : BO

Degenerate Perturbation Theory. 1 General framework and strategy

Time part of the equation can be separated by substituting independent equation

Car-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics

The successful wavefunction can be written as a determinant: # 1 (2) # 2 (2) Electrons. This can be generalized to our 2N-electron wavefunction:

eigenvalues eigenfunctions

Density Functional Theory for Electrons in Materials

Cyclic-N 3. II. Significant geometric phase effects in the vibrational spectra

The Twisting Trick for Double Well Hamiltonians

Molecular orbitals, potential energy surfaces and symmetry

and states of CH 2 Non-adiabatic effects in the à 2 B 2 through coupling vibrational modes Journal of Physics: Conference Series Related content

Notes on Density Functional Theory

Electronic structure considerations for C 2 and O 2

Chemistry 3502/4502. Final Exam Part I. May 14, 2005

wbt Λ = 0, 1, 2, 3, Eq. (7.63)

Vibrational Spectra (IR and Raman) update Tinoco has very little, p.576, Engel Ch. 18, House Ch. 6

Molecular energy levels

Molecular propagation through crossings and avoided crossings of electron energy levels

Ayan Chattopadhyay Mainak Mustafi 3 rd yr Undergraduates Integrated MSc Chemistry IIT Kharagpur

Intro/Review of Quantum

Intro/Review of Quantum

Instructor background for the discussion points of Section 2

Physics 221B Spring 2018 Notes 38 Adiabatic Invariance, the Geometric Phase, and the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

Molecular vibrations and molecular electronic spectra. Horst Köppel Theoretical Chemistry University of Heidelberg

The Relativistic Jahn-Teller Effect

Model for vibrational motion of a diatomic molecule. To solve the Schrödinger Eq. for molecules, make the Born- Oppenheimer Approximation:

Computational Methods. Chem 561

Schrödinger equation for central potentials

Reactivity and Organocatalysis. (Adalgisa Sinicropi and Massimo Olivucci)

Introduction to Hartree-Fock Molecular Orbital Theory

Applications of Quantum Theory to Some Simple Systems

Multicomponent density-functional theory for electrons and nuclei

Calculations of electron-molecule scattering cross sections using the Rmatrix method

Lecture 9: Molecular Orbital theory for hydrogen molecule ion

Protonium Formation in Antiproton Hydrogen Collisions

How to detect level crossings without looking at the spectrum

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 9, February 8, 2006

Chemistry 483 Lecture Topics Fall 2009

MO Calculation for a Diatomic Molecule. /4 0 ) i=1 j>i (1/r ij )

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

Pure and zero-point vibrational corrections to molecular properties

v(r i r j ) = h(r i )+ 1 N

/2Mα 2 α + V n (R)] χ (R) = E υ χ υ (R)

Chemistry 3502/4502. Final Exam Part I. May 14, 2005

2 Electronic structure theory

TSTC Dynamics Lectures July Ned Sibert University of Wisconsin

Wolfgang Demtroder. Molecular Physics. Theoretical Principles and Experimental Methods WILEY- VCH. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.

Chemistry 120A 2nd Midterm. 1. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (1-electron):

0 belonging to the unperturbed Hamiltonian H 0 are known

Quantum Molecular Dynamics Basics

IV. Classical Molecular Dynamics

Transcription:

Conical Intersections Spiridoula Matsika

The Born-Oppenheimer approximation Energy TS Nuclear coordinate R ν The study of chemical systems is based on the separation of nuclear and electronic motion The potential energy surfaces (PES) are generated by the solution of the electronic part of the Schrodinger equation. This solution gives an energy for every fixed position of the nuclei. When the energy is plotted as a function of geometries it generates the PES as a(3n-6) dimensional surface. Every electronic state has its own PES. On this potential energy surface, we can treat the motion of the nuclei classically or quantum mechanically

H = T + V H tot (r,r) = T N + T e + V ee + V en + V NN = 1 2 α + 2M α α Hamiltonian for molecules The total Hamiltonian operator for a molecular system is the sum of the kinetic energy operators (T) and potential energy operators (V) of all particles (nuclei and electrons). In atomic units the Hamiltonian is: Nuc kinetic En = T N + H e (r;r) 1 2 i + 2m e i Electr. kinetic En el-el repulsion el-nuc attraction i j>i 1 r ij Nuc-nuc repulsion Z α r αi + α i α β >α Z α Z β R αβ

H T = T N + H e = α Ψ T (r,r) = χ I (R)Ψ I e (r;r) 1 2 α + H e (r;r) 2M α Assuming that the motion of electrons and nuclei is separable, the Schrodinger equation is separated into an electronic and nuclear part. R and r are nuclear and electronic coordinates respectively. The total wavefunction Ψ T is a product of electronic Ψ e I and nuclear χ I wavefunctions for an I state. H T Ψ T = E T Ψ T H e Ψ I e = E I e Ψ I e Electronic eq. (T N + E I e )χ I = E T χ I Nuclear eq.

Nonadiabatic processes are facilitated by the close proximity of potential energy surfaces. When the potential energy surfaces approach each other the BO approximation breaks down. The rate for nonadiabatic transitions depends on the energy gap. Avoided crossing Energy Nuclear coordinate R

When electronic states approach each other, more than one of them should be included in the expansion Ψ T (r,r) = N a I =1 χ I (R)Ψ I e (r;r) (T N + 1 µ K II + E I e )χ I + + N J I 1 2µ ( 2f IJ χ J + K IJ Born-Huang expansion If the expansion is not truncated the wavefunction is exact since the set Ψ e I is complete. The total Schrodinger equation using the Born-Huang expansion becomes χ J ) = E T χ I f α IJ (R) = Ψ I e α Ψ J e k IJ (R) = Ψ I e 2 Ψ J e r r Derivative coupling: : couples the different electronic states

Derivative coupling f IJ = Ψ I Ψ J f IJ = f JI f II = 0 = Ψ I H Ψ J E J E I For real wavefunctions Ψ I 2 Ψ J = f IJ + f IJ f IJ The derivative coupling is inversely proportional to the energy difference of the two electronic states. Thus the smaller the difference, the larger the coupling. If ΔE=0 f is infinity.

What is a conical intersection Two adiabatic potential energy surfaces cross. The interstate coupling is large facilitating fast radiationless transitions between the surfaces

The Noncrossing Rule The adiabatic eigenfunctions are expanded in terms of ϕ i ψ 1 = c 11 ϕ 1 + c 21 ϕ 2 ψ 2 = c 12 ϕ 1 + c 22 ϕ 2 The electronic Hamiltonian is built and diagonalized H e = H 11 H 12 H 21 H 22 H ij = ϕ i H e ϕ j ΔH = H 11 H 22 The eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are: E 1,2 = H 11 + H 22 ± ΔH 2 + H 12 2 2 ψ 1 = cos α 2 ϕ 1 + sin α 2 ϕ 2 ψ 2 = sin α 2 ϕ 1 + cosα 2 ϕ 2 sin α 2 = H 12 ΔH 2 +H 12 2 cos α 2 = H 11 H 22 ΔH 2 +H 12 2

In order for the eigenvalues to become degenerate: H 11 (R)=H 22 (R) H 12 (R) =0 Since two conditions are needed for the existence of a conical intersection the dimensionality is N int -2, where N int is the number of internal coordinates For diatomic molecules there is only one internal coordinate and so states of the same symmetry cannot cross (noncrossing rule). But polyatomic molecules have more internal coordinates and states of the same symmetry can cross. J. von Neumann and E. Wigner, Phys.Z 30,467 (1929)

Conical intersections and H e = H 11 H 12 H 21 H 22 symmetry Symmetry required conical intersections, Jahn-Teller effect H 12 =0, H 11 =H 22 by symmetry seam has dimension N of high symmetry Example: E state in H 3 in D3h symmetry Symmetry allowed conical intersections (between states of different symmetry) H 12 =0 by symmetry Seam has dimension N-1 Example: A 1 -B 2 degeneracy in C2v symmetry in H 2 +OH Accidental same-symmetry conical intersections Seam has dimension N-2

Example: X3 system branching coordinates α Q x R Q y r Seam coordinate Q s

Figure 4a Two internal coordinates lift the degeneracy linearly: g-h or branching plane energy (a.u.) 0.015 0.01 0.005 0-0.005-0.01-0.015 E g h -0.2-0.1 y (bohr) 0 0.1 0.2-0.2-0.1 0 x (bohr) 0.1 0.2 E (ev) N int -2 coordinates form the seam: points of conical intersections are connected continuously 3 2 1 0-1 -2-3 2.9 3 3.1 r (a.u.) 3.2 3.3 3.4-0.4-0.20-0.6 0.6 0.4 0.2 x (a.u.)

The Branching Plane The Hamiltonian matrix elements are expanded in a Taylor series expansion around the conical intersection H(R) = H(R 0 ) + H(R 0 ) δr ΔH(R) = 0 + ΔH(R 0 ) δr H 12 (R) = 0 + H 12 (R 0 ) δr Then the conditions for degeneracy are ΔH(R 0 ) δr = 0 H 12 (R 0 ) δr = 0 g = ΔH h = H 12 H e = (s x x + s y y)i + gx hy hy gx E 1,2 = s x x + s y y ± (gx) 2 + (hy) 2

Topography of a conical intersection asymmetry tilt E ± = E 0 + s x x + s y y ± g 2 x 2 + h 2 y 2 Conical intersections are described in terms of the characteristic parameters g,h,s

Geometric phase effect (Berry If the angle α changes from α to α +2π: ψ 1 = cos α 2 ϕ + sin α 1 2 ϕ 2 ψ 2 = sin α 2 ϕ + cos α 1 2 ϕ 2 ψ 1 (α + 2π) = ψ 1 (α) ψ 2 (α + 2π) = ψ 2 (α) phase) The electronic wavefunction is doubled valued, so a phase has to be added so that the total wavefunction is single valued Ψ T = e ia(r ) ψ(r;r)χ(r) The geometric phase effect can be used for the identification of conical intersections. If the line integral of the derivative coupling around a loop is equal to π

Adiabatic and Diabatic represenation Adiabatic representation uses the eigenfunctions of the electronic hamiltonian.. The derivative coupling then is present in the total Schrodinger equation Diabatic representation is a transformation from the adiabatic which makes the derivative coupling vanish. Off diagonal matrix elements appear. Better for dynamics since matrix elements are scalar but the derivative coupling is a vector. Strickly diabatic bases don t t exist. Only quasidiabatic where f is very small.

Practically g and h are taken from ab initio wavefunctions expanded in a CSF basis Ψ I e = N CSF m=1 c m I ψ m [ H e (R) E I (R)]c I (R) = 0 Tuning, coupling vectors h α IJ (R) = c I (R x ) H(R) R α c J (R x ) g αi (R) = c I (R x ) H(R) R α c I (R x ) g IJ (R)= g I (R) - g J (R)

Locating the minimum energy point on the seam of conical intersections Projected gradient technique: M. J. Baerpack,, M. Robe and H.B. Schlegel Chem.. Phys. Lett. 223,, 269, (1994) Lagrange multiplier technique: M. R. Manaa and D. R. Yarkony, J. Chem. Phys., 99,, 5251, (1993)

Locate conical intersections using lagrange multipliers: ΔE ij + g ji δr = 0 h ji δr = 0 Additional geometrical constrains, K i,, can be imposed. These conditions can be imposed by finding an extremum of the Lagrangian. L (R, ξ,λ )= E k + ξ 1 ΔE ij + ξ 2 H ij + λ i K i

Branching vectors for OH+OH g h O O H H O O H H

Routing effect: E OH(A)+OH(X) Figure 4a Quenching to OH(X)+OH(X) g h Reaction to H 2 O+O

Three-state conical intersections Three state conical intersections can exist between three states of the same symmetry in a system with N int degress of freedom in a subspace of dimension N int -5 H 11 H 12 H 13 H = H 12 H 22 H 23 H 13 H 23 H 33 H 11 (R)=H 22 (R)= H 33 H 12 (R) = H 13 (R) = H 23 (R) =0 Dimensionality: N int -5, where N int is the number of internal coordinates J. von Neumann and E. Wigner, Phys.Z 30,467 (1929)

Conditions for a conical intersection including the spin-orbit interaction Ψ 1 Ψ 2 TΨ 1 TΨ 2 H 11 H 12 0 H 1T2 * H 12 H 22 H 1T 2 0 * H 11 H 12 H 12 H 22 In general 5 conditions need to be satisfied. H 11 =H 22 Re(H 12 )=0 Im(H 12 )=0 Re(H )=0, 1T satisfied in C 2 s symmetry Im(H )=0, 1T satisfied in C s symmetry 1T 2 The dimension of the seam is N int -5 or N int -3 C.A.Mead J.Chem.Phys., 70, 2276, (1979)