Passage times for a spectrally negative Lévy process with applications to risk theory

Similar documents
Quasi-stationary distributions for Lévy processes

A Note On The Erlang(λ, n) Risk Process

University Of Calgary Department of Mathematics and Statistics

Characterizations on Heavy-tailed Distributions by Means of Hazard Rate

Finite-time Ruin Probability of Renewal Model with Risky Investment and Subexponential Claims

Reinsurance and ruin problem: asymptotics in the case of heavy-tailed claims

Analysis of the ruin probability using Laplace transforms and Karamata Tauberian theorems

Ruin probabilities in multivariate risk models with periodic common shock

On the quantiles of the Brownian motion and their hitting times.

Erik J. Baurdoux Some excursion calculations for reflected Lévy processes

Extremes and ruin of Gaussian processes

Necessary and sucient condition for the boundedness of the Gerber-Shiu function in dependent Sparre Andersen model

A LOGARITHMIC EFFICIENT ESTIMATOR OF THE PROBABILITY OF RUIN WITH RECUPERATION FOR SPECTRALLY NEGATIVE LEVY RISK PROCESSES.

Reduced-load equivalence for queues with Gaussian input

Asymptotics of the Finite-time Ruin Probability for the Sparre Andersen Risk. Model Perturbed by an Inflated Stationary Chi-process

Ruin probabilities of the Parisian type for small claims

On Optimal Stopping Problems with Power Function of Lévy Processes

A NEW PROOF OF THE WIENER HOPF FACTORIZATION VIA BASU S THEOREM

The Subexponential Product Convolution of Two Weibull-type Distributions

A Ruin Model with Compound Poisson Income and Dependence Between Claim Sizes and Claim Intervals

Scale functions for spectrally negative Lévy processes and their appearance in economic models

Asymptotic Tail Probabilities of Sums of Dependent Subexponential Random Variables

The exact asymptotics for hitting probability of a remote orthant by a multivariate Lévy process: the Cramér case

Characterization through Hazard Rate of heavy tailed distributions and some Convolution Closure Properties

On the martingales obtained by an extension due to Saisho, Tanemura and Yor of Pitman s theorem

Distribution of the first ladder height of a stationary risk process perturbed by α-stable Lévy motion

Potentials of stable processes

Entrance from 0 for increasing semistable Markov processes

On Reflecting Brownian Motion with Drift

The Azéma-Yor Embedding in Non-Singular Diffusions

Exponential functionals of Lévy processes

Asymptotic Irrelevance of Initial Conditions for Skorohod Reflection Mapping on the Nonnegative Orthant

Randomly Weighted Sums of Conditionnally Dependent Random Variables

Conditional Tail Expectations for Multivariate Phase Type Distributions

Asymptotics of random sums of heavy-tailed negatively dependent random variables with applications

The equivalence of two tax processes

A Change of Variable Formula with Local Time-Space for Bounded Variation Lévy Processes with Application to Solving the American Put Option Problem 1

Functional Limit theorems for the quadratic variation of a continuous time random walk and for certain stochastic integrals

ON ADDITIVE TIME-CHANGES OF FELLER PROCESSES. 1. Introduction

Bernstein-gamma functions and exponential functionals of Lévy processes

The absolute continuity relationship: a fi» fi =exp fif t (X t a t) X s ds W a j Ft () is well-known (see, e.g. Yor [4], Chapter ). It also holds with

Asymptotic behavior for sums of non-identically distributed random variables

Practical approaches to the estimation of the ruin probability in a risk model with additional funds

arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 19 Aug 2017

Ernesto Mordecki 1. Lecture III. PASI - Guanajuato - June 2010

Minimization of ruin probabilities by investment under transaction costs

Analytical properties of scale functions for spectrally negative Lévy processes

Recurrent extensions of self-similar Markov processes and Cramér s condition

Other properties of M M 1

On Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities in a Risk Model Under Quota Share Reinsurance

Asymptotic Ruin Probabilities for a Bivariate Lévy-driven Risk Model with Heavy-tailed Claims and Risky Investments

4 Sums of Independent Random Variables

EULER MARUYAMA APPROXIMATION FOR SDES WITH JUMPS AND NON-LIPSCHITZ COEFFICIENTS

The Ruin Probability of a Discrete Time Risk Model under Constant Interest Rate with Heavy Tails

Asymptotic behaviour near extinction of continuous state branching processes

PITMAN S 2M X THEOREM FOR SKIP-FREE RANDOM WALKS WITH MARKOVIAN INCREMENTS

A REFINED FACTORIZATION OF THE EXPONENTIAL LAW P. PATIE

arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 30 Mar 2014

Infinitely divisible distributions and the Lévy-Khintchine formula

Geometric ρ-mixing property of the interarrival times of a stationary Markovian Arrival Process

Asymptotics for the small fragments of the fragmentation at nodes

Lecture 17 Brownian motion as a Markov process

Smoothness of scale functions for spectrally negative Lévy processes

Threshold dividend strategies for a Markov-additive risk model

ITÔ S ONE POINT EXTENSIONS OF MARKOV PROCESSES. Masatoshi Fukushima

Regular Variation and Extreme Events for Stochastic Processes

COVARIANCE IDENTITIES AND MIXING OF RANDOM TRANSFORMATIONS ON THE WIENER SPACE

THE VARIANCE CONSTANT FOR THE ACTUAL WAITING TIME OF THE PH/PH/1 QUEUE. By Mogens Bladt National University of Mexico

A Dynamic Contagion Process with Applications to Finance & Insurance

arxiv: v2 [math.pr] 15 Jul 2015

WEIGHTED SUMS OF SUBEXPONENTIAL RANDOM VARIABLES AND THEIR MAXIMA

Lecture Notes on Risk Theory

arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 20 May 2018

Rare event simulation for the ruin problem with investments via importance sampling and duality

Precise Large Deviations for Sums of Negatively Dependent Random Variables with Common Long-Tailed Distributions

arxiv: v1 [q-fin.rm] 27 Jun 2017

HJB equations. Seminar in Stochastic Modelling in Economics and Finance January 10, 2011

Optimal stopping of a risk process when claims are covered immediately

Faithful couplings of Markov chains: now equals forever

Heavy tails of a Lévy process and its maximum over a random time interval

RELATING TIME AND CUSTOMER AVERAGES FOR QUEUES USING FORWARD COUPLING FROM THE PAST

Short-time expansions for close-to-the-money options under a Lévy jump model with stochastic volatility

Supermodular ordering of Poisson arrays

The finite-time Gerber-Shiu penalty function for two classes of risk processes

Stability of the Defect Renewal Volterra Integral Equations

Limit theorems for multipower variation in the presence of jumps

First passage time for Brownian motion and piecewise linear boundaries

DISTRIBUTIONAL STUDY OF DE FINETTI S DIVIDEND PROBLEM FOR A GENERAL LÉVY INSURANCE RISK PROCESS

NAN WANG and KOSTAS POLITIS

Monotonicity and Aging Properties of Random Sums

Central limit theorems for ergodic continuous-time Markov chains with applications to single birth processes

Stochastic Areas and Applications in Risk Theory

An Example file... log.txt

Octavio Arizmendi, Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen and Víctor Pérez-Abreu

ON THE FIRST TIME THAT AN ITO PROCESS HITS A BARRIER

GARCH processes continuous counterparts (Part 2)

An optimal dividends problem with a terminal value for spectrally negative Lévy processes with a completely monotone jump density

The optimality of a dividend barrier strategy for Lévy insurance risk processes, with a focus on the univariate Erlang mixture

Stochastic Processes

A Class of Fractional Stochastic Differential Equations

Transcription:

Hong Kong Baptist University HKBU Institutional Repository HKBU Staff Publication 25 Passage times for a spectrally negative Lévy process with applications to risk theory Sung Nok Chiu Hong Kong Baptist University, snchiu@hkbu.edu.hk Chuancun Yin Hong Kong Baptist University, ccyin@qfnu.edu.cn This document is the authors' final version of the published article. Link to published article: http://dx.doi.org/1.315/bj/112591186 Recommended Citation Chiu, Sung Nok, and Chuancun Yin. "Passage times for a spectrally negative Lévy process with applications to risk theory." Bernoulli 3.11 (25): 511-522. This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by HKBU Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in HKBU Staff Publication by an authorized administrator of HKBU Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact repository@hkbu.edu.hk.

Bernoulli 11(3), 25, 511 522 Passage times for a spectrally negative Lévy process with applications to risk theory SUNG NOK CHIU 1 and CHUANCUN YIN 2,1 1 Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong. E-mail: snchiu@math.hkbu.edu.hk 2 Department of Mathematics, Qufu Normal University, Shandong 273165, P. R. China. E-mail: ccyin@qfnu.edu.cn The distributions of the last passage time at a given level and the joint distributions of the last passage time, the first passage time and their difference for a general spectrally negative process are derived in the form of Laplace transforms. The results are applied to risk theory. Keywords: first passage time; last passage time; spectrally negative Lévy process; risk theory 1. Introduction Let X ¼ (Ù, F, F t, X (t), Ł t, P x ) denote the canonical realization of a spectrally negative Lévy process with P x fx () ¼ xg ¼1. Thus X is a Hunt process with stationary independent increments specified by where E x is the expectation with respect to P x, and ł(æ) ¼ aæ þ 1 2 ó 2 Æ 2 þ E e ÆX (t) ¼ e tł(æ), Æ >, (1:1) ð fe Æx 1 Æx1(x. )gí(dx), (1:2) with a 2 R, ó 2 >, and í is a non-negative measure supported on (, ) satisfying ð í(dx), 1 and ð x 2 í(dx), 1: The measure í and the function ł are called the Lévy measure and the Lévy exponent of X, respectively. Ð Such a Lévy process has bounded variation if and only if ó ¼ and jxjí(dx), 1. In this case the Lévy exponent can be re-expressed as ł(æ) ¼ bæ þ ð (e Æx 1)í(dx), 135 7265 # 25 ISI/BS

512 S.N. Chiu and C. Yin where b ¼ a Ð xí(dx) is known as the drift coefficient. If ó 2., X is said to have a Gaussian component. As usual, we also assume that X is not a subordinator. If Y is a spectrally positive Lévy process, then X :¼ Y is a spectrally negative Lévy process. Thus the results for Y can be obtained from the corresponding results for X. The following facts on ł can be found in Bertoin (1996): ł is strictly increasing and continuous on [z, 1), where z is the largest real zero of ł; ł() ¼ ; ł(æ)!1 as Æ!1; ł9(þ) ¼ E X (1); and ł9(æ). for Æ.. The right inverse of ł is denoted by ł. For x 2 R, denote by ô x ¼ infft > :X (t). xg and T x ¼ infft > :X (t), xg the first passage time above and below the level x, respectively; denote by l x ¼ supft > :X (t), xg and T9 x ¼ infft > T x : X (t). xg the last passage time below the level x and the first passage time above the level x after T x, respectively, with the usual convention that inf ¼1 and sup ¼. Since E X (1) < leads to lim inf t!1 X (t) ¼ almost surely (Zolotarev 1964), which implies l x ¼1 almost surely for any fixed x, we assume that E X (1)., which is equivalent to P flim t!1 X (t) ¼ þ1g ¼ 1 (Bingham 1975). For ease of presentation, let Q(x) ¼ 1 Q(x) ¼ P finf t> X (t), xg for x >, Q() :¼ lim x# Q(x) and E X (1) ¼ m. Lemma 1.1 (Bertoin, 1996, p. 189, Theorem 1). For the spectrally negative Lévy process X, ô x with x > is a subordinator with the Laplace exponent ł, that is, E e Æô x ¼ e xł (Æ), Æ > : (1:3) Consequently ł is differentiable. Lemma 1.2 (Zolotarev 1964). For the spectrally negative Lévy process X, Q(x) can be determined by Æ e Æx Q(x)dx ¼ 1 Æm ł(æ) : (1:4) It follows from (1.4) that Q() ¼ 1 if ó 2. or Ð jxjí(dx) ¼1 (see also Rogozin 1965; Prabhu 197), and that Q() ¼ ð ð xí(dx) xí(dx) a if ó ¼ and Ð jxjí(dx), 1. It is known that t(c) ¼ expfcx(t) ł(c)tg is a martingale under P for any c such that ł(c) is finite (see Avram et al. 24). Let P (c) denote the probability measure on F defined by dp (c) ¼ t(c), dp F t

Passage times for a spectrally negative Lévy process 513 for all < t, 1. We have for the stopping time T x (x < ), P (c) (T x, 1) ¼ E f Tx (c)1(t x, 1)g ¼E f Tx (c)g: (1:5) Under the measure P (c), X remains within the class of spectrally negative processes and the Laplace exponent of X is given by (see Avram et al. 24) ł c (Ł) ¼ ł(ł þ c) ł(c), Ł > minf c, g: (1:6) Definition 1.1 (Avram et al. 24; Bertoin 1997). Consider (X, P (c) ). For p >, the p-scale function W ( c p) :(, 1)! [, 1) is the unique function whose restriction to (, 1) is continuous and has Laplace transform e Łx W ( c p) (x)dx ¼fł c (Ł) pg, Ł. ł c ( p), and is defined to be identically zero for x <. Further, for every x >, the mapping p! W ( c p) (x) can be extended to p 2 C by W ( c p) (x) ¼ P 1 k¼ pk W (kþ1) c (x), where W k c denotes the kth convolution power of the function W (). Moreover, let Z ( c p) (x) ¼ 1 þ p ð x c W ( c p) (y)dy: Lemma 1.3 (Emery 1973). For Æ > and â >, the joint Laplace transform of T y and X (T y ) is given by E x (e ÆT yþâx(t y ) ) ¼ e âx fz ( p) â where p ¼ Æ ł(â). (x y) W ( p) â (x y) p=ł( p)g, x > y, (1:7) Lemma 1.4 (Doney 1991). (i) For any bounded variation spectrally negative Lévy process we have E (e ŁT9 ) ¼ 1 fb(ł )9(Ł)g for Ł.. (ii) For any spectrally negative Lévy process with paths of unbounded variation, T9 ¼ almost surely. The first passage time for Lévy processes has been well studied; see Doney (1991), Emery (1973), Prabhu (197), Rogers (199; 2) and Zolotarev (1964). This paper is more concerned with the last passage time and its joint distribution with the duration between the first and the last visit at x and the duration of the first period spent below the level x. More precisely, the main purpose of this paper is to develop results related to the random variables l x ô x, l x T x, l x and T9 x T x for spectrally negative Lévy processes. Explicit solutions of the Laplace transforms of the distributions are obtained. The outline of the paper is as follows. Section 2 gives some primary results for a Lévy process with bounded variation. Section 3 considers the general case, which of course includes Lévy processes with bounded variation as a special case. We present the bounded variation case separately to demonstrate a different methodology. Applications in risk theory are discussed in Section 4. â

514 S.N. Chiu and C. Yin 2. Special case This section considers the spectrally negative Lévy process with bounded variation, that is, the case of X with ó ¼ and Ð jxjí(dx), 1. Under these conditions, X is essentially a positive drift minus a subordinator (see Bingham 1975, Proposition 6). To avoid ambiguity, we use a different notation for the Lévy component in this case: ö(æ) ¼ bæ þ ð (e Æx 1)í(dx), where b ¼ a Ð xí(dx). We first give the Laplace transform of l x ô x, the duration between the first and the last visit at x, then deduce the Laplace transform of l x, and finally find the joint Laplace transform of T x, l x T x and T9 x T x. Theorem 2.1. For any y < x and Æ., we have E y e Æ(l x ô x ) ¼ m(ö )9(Æ): (2:1) Proof. We first consider y ¼. For x >, let S n (x) denote the time elapsed between the nth and the (n þ 1)th visit at x. Since x is both non-polar and non-regular, it is clear that l x ô x ¼ S 1 (x) þ...þ S N (x) on fø 2 Ù : S i (x)(ø), 1g, where N ¼ maxfk > 1:S k (x), 1g. The Markov property of the process implies that the random variables S i (x) are independent and identically distributed. Moreover, they are independent of N, which has a geometric distribution P (N ¼ k) ¼ Q()Q k (), k ¼, 1, 2,...: Note that P (l x ô x, 1) ¼ 1 and P fs 1 (x) > T x g¼1. Thus, for Æ., we have E e Æ(l x ô x ) ¼ E (e Æ(l x ô x ) jl x ô x, 1) ¼ X1 k¼ fe (e ÆS 1(x) js 1 (x), 1)g k P (N ¼ k) Q() ¼ 1 Q()E (e ÆS 1(x) js 1 (x), 1) : (2:2) The distribution of S 1 (x) does not depend on x, since the process X has stationary independent increments. It follows from Lemma 1.4 that which implies that E fe ÆS 1() 1(T, 1)g ¼E e ÆS 1() ¼ 1 fb(ö )9(Æ)g, E (e ÆS 1() js 1 (), 1) ¼ E (e ÆS 1() jt, 1) ¼ [1 fb(ö )9(Æ)g ]=Q(): Substituting this into (2.2) and noting that Q()b ¼ m, we obtain

Passage times for a spectrally negative Lévy process 515 E e Æ(l x ô x ) ¼ m(ö )9(Æ): (2:3) Since X has stationary independent increments, for x, y 2 R and y < x, and the result follows. E y e Æ(l x ô x ) ¼ E e Æ(l x y ô x y ), Theorem 2.2. For Æ. and x, y 2 R, 8 m(ö )9(Æ)e (x y)ö (Æ), y, x, (2:4) >< E y fe Æl x m(ö )9(Æ) m, y ¼ x, (2:5) 1(l x. )g ¼ b m(ö )9(Æ)P (ö (Æ)) >: (T x y, 1), y. x: (2:6) e (x y)ö (Æ) Proof. Since P fx (ô x ) ¼ xg ¼1, the strong Markov property of X at time ô x implies that, for x, s, t., P (l x ô x, t, ô x, s) ¼ E fp X (ôx )(l x, t)1(ô x, s)g ¼ P x (l x, t)p (ô x, s): (2:7) The process X has only negative jumps and P flim t!1 X (t) ¼ þ1g ¼ 1, thus P (ô x, 1) ¼ 1 for x.. Consequently, letting s!1 in (2.7) yields P (l x ô x, t) ¼ P x (l x, t), and hence (2.7) shows that l x ô x and ô x are independent with respect to P. As a result, by (2.3) and Lemma 1.1, we have, for x., Letting x # yields E e Æl x ¼ E e Æ(l x ô x ) E e Æô x ¼ m(ö )9(Æ)e xö (Æ) : E e Æl ¼ m(ö )9(Æ), and due to the stationarity and independence of increments, for any x 2 R, wehave E x e Æl x ¼ E e Æl ¼ m(ö )9(Æ), (2:8) which is equivalent to (2.5). For any y, x, P y (l x. ) ¼ P y (ô x, 1) ¼ 1 and P y (X (ô x ) ¼ x) ¼ 1. By the strong Markov property of X at time ô x, E y fe Æl x 1(l x. )g ¼E y [e Æô x E X (ôx )fe Æl x 1(l x > )g1(ô x, 1)] ¼ E e Æô x y E x e Æl x : (2:9) Equation (2.4) follows from (2.8), (2.9) and Lemma 1.1. Since X has stationary independent increments and is strong Markov, for any y. x, we have

516 S.N. Chiu and C. Yin E y fe Æl x 1(l x. )g ¼E fe Æl x y 1(l x y. )g ¼ E [e ÆT x y E X (Tx y )fe Æl x y 1(l x y > )g1(t x y, 1)] ¼ ð x y e Æt E z (e Æl x y )P ft x y 2 dt, X (T x y ) 2 dz, T x y, 1g, so that equation (2.6) follows from (2.4) and (1.5). h Theorem 2.3. Suppose that Æ, â, ä. and x, y 2 R. Ify. x, then E y fe ÆT x â(l x T x ) ä(t9 x T x ) 1(T x, 1)g ¼ m(ö )9(â)e (âþä) 1(Æ, xö â, ä, x, y), (2:1) where ( 1(Æ, â, ä, x, y) ¼ e ö (âþä) y Z ( p 1) ö (âþä) (y x) W ( p1) ö (âþä) (y x) p ) 1 ö ö (âþä) ( p, 1) in which p 1 ¼ Æ â ä. Proof. By the strong Markov property of X and (2.4), E y fe ÆT x â(l x T x ) ä(t9 x T x ) 1(T x, 1)g ¼ E y fe ÆT x E X (Tx )e âl x ät9 x 1(T x, 1)g ¼ E y fe ÆT x E X (Tx )fe (âþä)t9 x E x e âl x g1(t x, 1)g ¼ m(ö )9(â)E y fe ÆT x ö (âþä)fx X (T x )g 1(T x, 1)g ¼ m(ö )9(â)e xö (âþä) E y fe ÆT xþö (âþä)x (T x ) g, and the result follows from Lemma 1.3. h The following corollary generalizes the result in Doney (1991, equation (2.19)). Corollary 2.1. For any Æ, â., we have E fe ÆT â(l T ) ä(t9 T ) 1(T, 1)g ¼ m(ö Æ â ä )9(â) 1 bfö (Æ) ö : (â þ ä)g Proof. From the proof of Theorem 2.3 one finds

Passage times for a spectrally negative Lévy process 517 Since E fe ÆT â(l T ) ä(t9 T ) 1(T, 1)g ¼ m(ö )9(â)E fe ÆT þö (âþä)x(t ) g: E e ÆT þö (â)x (T ) ¼ 1 Æ â bfö (Æ) ö (â)g (Prabhu 197), the result follows. h 3. General case In the previous section, we computed the Laplace transforms of l x, l x ô x and the joint Laplace transform of T x, l x T x and T9 x T x for a spectrally negative Lévy process X with bounded variation. In this section, we consider the general Lévy process defined by (1.1) and (1.2), which includes the bounded variation case in Section 2. The argument used in Section 2, however, cannot be applied to the case where ó 6¼ or Ð jxjí(dx) ¼1, because then X has unbounded variation and hence S i (x) ¼ almost surely (see Lemma 1.4(ii)). Theorem 3.1. For Æ. and x, y 2 R, we have 8 m(ł )9(Æ)e (x y)ł (Æ), y, x, >< E y fe Æl x m(ł 1(l x. )g ¼ )9(Æ) Q(), y ¼ x, where Q() ¼ if ó 2. or jxjí(dx), 1. Ð m(ł )9(Æ)P (ł (Æ)) >: (T x y, 1), y. x, e (x y)ł (Æ) (3:1) (3:2) (3:3) Ð jxjí(dx) ¼1, and Q() ¼ m=b if ó 2 ¼ and Proof. Since fl, tg ¼fX (t)., inf s>t X (s). g, using the Markov property and right continuity, we have E e Æl ¼ Æ ¼ Æ e Æt P (l, t)dt e Æt Q(x)P fx (t) 2 dxgdt: Applying the identity tp fô x 2 dtgdx ¼ xp fx (t) 2 dxgdt (Bertoin 1996, p. 19, Corollary 3) to this leads to

518 S.N. Chiu and C. Yin E e Æl ¼ Æ x Q(x) te Æt P (ô x 2 dt) dx ¼ Æ ¼ Æ ¼ Æ(ł )9(Æ) ¼ m(ł )9(Æ), x Q(x) d dæ x Q(x) d (Æ) dæ fe xł g dx Q(x)e xł (Æ) dx e Æt P (ô x 2 dt) dx where (1.3) and (1.4) have been used in the third and last step, respectively. The process X has stationary independent increments, and thus, for any x 2 R, we have E x e Æl x ¼ E e Æl ¼ m(ł )9(Æ), (3:4) and (3.2) follows. Since (2.9) remains true for processes of unbounded variation, it, together with (1.3) and (3.4), yields (3.1). For any y. x, using (3.4) and an argument similar to the proof of (2.6), we obtain E y fe Æl x 1(l x. )g ¼ ð x y and (3.3) follows. m(ł )9(Æ) e Æt e (x y z)ł (Æ) P ft x y 2 dt, X (T x y ) 2 dz, T x y, 1g, h Remark 3.1. By using Lemma 1.2 or Kyprianou and Palmowski (25, Theorem 4), we have P (ł (Æ)) (T x y, 1) ¼ 1 ł9 ł (Æ)(þ)W () (y x), ł (Æ) and replacing ł by ö yields an expression for the probability P (ö (Æ)) (T x y, 1) in the special case presented in Section 2. Theorem 3.2. Suppose that Æ, â, ä. and x, y 2 R. Ify, x, then and if y. x, then where E y fe Æô x â(l x ô x ) 1(ô x, 1)g ¼m(ł )9(â)e (x y)ł (Æ), (3:5) E y fe ÆT x â(l x T x )þäx (T x ) 1(T x, 1)g ¼m(ł )9(â)e xł (â) 2(Æ, â, ä, x, y), (3:6)

Passage times for a spectrally negative Lévy process 519 2(Æ, â, ä, x, y) ¼ e k y Z ( p 2) k (y x) W ( p 2) k (y x) p 2 ł k ( p, 2) with p 2 ¼ Æ ł(ä þ ł (â)) and k ¼ ä þ ł (â). Proof. For any y, x 2 R such that y, x, P y (ô x, 1) ¼ 1 and P y (X (ô x ) ¼ x) ¼ 1. The strong Markov property of X at time ô x, the stationarity and independence of increments and equation (3.2) imply that, for Æ, â., E y fe Æô x â(l x ô x ) 1(ô x, 1)g ¼E y [e Æô x E X (ôx )fe âl x 1(l x > )g1(ô x, 1)] ¼ E y (e Æô x) E x fe âl x 1(l x > )g ¼ E (e Æô x y )E x (e âl x ): (3:7) Equation (3.5) follows from (1.3), (3.4) and (3.7). For any y, x 2 R such that y. x and Æ, â, ä., from the strong Markov property of X and (3.1), E y fe ÆT x â(l x T x )þäx(t x ) 1(T x, 1)g ¼ E y [e ÆT xþäx (T x ) E X (Tx )fe âl x 1(l x > )g1(t x, 1)] ¼ ð x e Ætþäz E z fe âl x 1(l x > )gp y ft x 2 dt, X (T x ) 2 dz, T x, 1g ¼ m(ł )9(â) and the result follows. ð x e Ætþäz e (x z)ł (â) P y ft x 2 dt, X (T x ) 2 dz, T x, 1g, h 4. Applications to risk theory Consider the surplus R(t) that is the classical risk process perturbed by diffusion: R(t) ¼ u þ ct þ ó B t XN t i¼1 Z i, t >, (4:1) where u > is the initial surplus, ó a non-negative constant, c the positive constant premium income rate, fb t, t > g the standard Brownian motion, fn t, t > g a Poisson process with intensity º., and fz k, k > 1g a sequence of non-negative independent and identically distributed claim amounts, such that fb t, t > g, fn t, t > g and fz k, k > 1g are independent. Denote by P and ì the distribution function and the mean, respectively, of the claim sizes Z k, with the condition that P() ¼. Assume that the safety loading c ºì

52 S.N. Chiu and C. Yin is positive, so that lim t!1 R(t) ¼1 almost surely if the process continues even when the surplus is negative. For simplicity, P is assumed to possess a density p. The diffusion term in (4.1) contributes an additional uncertainty of the premium income or the aggregate claims to the surplus. This model was first introduced and studied by Gerber (197). When ó ¼, (4.1) is called the classical risk process. We refer to Embrechts et al. (1997), Rolski et al. (1999) and Asmussen (2) for a complete presentation of risk theory. Denote the Laplace transform of p by ^p(æ) ¼ Ð 1 e Æx p(x)dx. ThenE e ÆfR(t) ug ¼ e tî(æ), where î(æ) ¼ cæ þ 1 2 ó 2 Æ 2 þ ºf ^p(æ) 1g. Obviously fr(t) u, t > g is a spectrally negative Lévy process with E fr(1) ug ¼c ºì. and initial value zero. Let T denote the time of ruin and Ø(u) ¼ P u (T, 1) the ultimate ruin probability. It is well known that Ø() is 1 if ó 6¼, and is ºì=c otherwise. If we use the notation in Section 1, we have T ¼ T and Ø(u) ¼ Q(u). One central topic of risk theory is to find the probability of ruin. Recently there has been growing interest in the distributions of some other random variables related to the surplus process. These random variables include the time when the surplus reaches some level for the first time (Gerber 199; Picard and Lefèvre 1994; Zhang and Wu 22), the time when the surplus crosses some level for the last time (Gerber 199), the duration of negative surplus (Egídio dos Reis 1993; Zhang and Wu 22) and the recovery time from negative surplus (Dickson and Egídio dos Reis 1997; Egídio dos Reis 2; Yang and Zhang 21). A scenario where these random variables make sense is as follows. Suppose that the portfolio under consideration is one of many belonging to a company so that it has other funds available to support negative surpluses for a while, in the hope that the portfolio will recover in the future. In such a situation perhaps a more interesting question is to find the distributions of the first and last passage times and of their difference for the surplus process at a given level. Gerber (199) considered this question for the classical risk model and obtained explicit results for their Laplace transforms and their moments. However, when we consider the time of last passage at level x and the duration between successive visits at x for the classical risk process perturbed by diffusion, the method of Gerber (199) is not applicable because the infinite oscillation of R(t) due to the Brownian motion B t yields an arbitrarily small duration. Nevertheless, the general results of spectrally negative Lévy processes in Sections 2 and 3 can be used directly. Using the same notation ô x, l x, T x and T9 x as before and applying the results in previous sections to the special Lévy process defined by equation (4.1), we obtain the following results. Theorem 4.1. For any y < x and Æ., we have E y e Æ(l x ô x ) ¼ c ºì c þ º ^p9(î (Æ)) : Theorem 4.2. For Æ. and x, y 2 R,

Passage times for a spectrally negative Lévy process 521 8 >< E y fe Æl x 1(l x. )g ¼ c ºì c þ î (Æ)ó 2 þ º ^p9(î (Æ)) e (x y)î (Æ), y, x, º(c ºì) ^p9(î (Æ)) cfc þ º ^p9(î, y ¼ x, ó ¼, (Æ))g c ºì c þ î (Æ)ó 2 þ º ^p9(î, y ¼ x, ó 6¼, (Æ)) (c ºì)P (î (Æ)) (T x y, 1) >: c þ î (Æ)ó 2 þ º ^p9(î (Æ)) e (x y)î (Æ), y. x: Theorem 4.3. For any Æ, â, ä. and x, y 2 R, ify, x, then and if y. x, then E y fe Æô x â(l x ô x ) 1(ô x, 1)g ¼ (c ºì)e (x y)î (Æ) c þ î (â)ó 2 þ º ^p9(î (â)), E y fe ÆT x â(l x T x )þär(t x ) 1(T x, 1)g ¼ (c ºì)E e ÆT x yþfäþî (â)gr(t x y ) fc þ î (â)ó 2 þ º ^p9(î (â))ge xî (â), where E e ÆT x yþfäþî (â)gr(t x y ) can be computed by using Lemma 1.3. Theorem 4.4. Suppose that Æ, â, ä. and ó ¼. For any x, y 2 R, ify. x, then E y f ÆT x â(l x T x ) ä(t9 x T x ) 1(T x, 1)g c ºì ¼ c þ º ^p9(î e xî1 (âþä) E fe ÆT x yþî 1 (âþä)r(t x y) g, 1 (â)) where î 1 (Æ) ¼ cæ þ ºf ^p(æ) 1g and E e ÆT x yþî 1 (âþä)r(t x y) can be computed by using Lemma 1.3. Remark 4.1. Taking c ¼ 1, y ¼ and Æ ¼ s in the case of ó ¼ in Theorem 4.2, we get Gerber (199, p. 118, equation (43)). Acknowledgements We thank two anonymous referees for their detailed comments and valuable suggestions, which helped improve the presentation. This research was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. HKBU 248/2P) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 147176).

522 S.N. Chiu and C. Yin References Asmussen, S. (2) Ruin Probabilities. Singapore: World Scientific. Avram, F., Kyprianou, A.E. and Pistorius, M.R. (24) Exit problems for spectrally negative Lévy processes and applications to (Canadized) Russian options. Ann. Appl. Probab., 14, 215 238. Bertoin, J. (1996) Lévy Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bertoin, J. (1997) Exponential decay and ergodicity of completely asymmetric Lévy processes in a finite interval. Ann. Appl. Probab., 7, 156 169. Bingham, N.H. (1975) Fluctuation theory in continuous time. Adv. Appl. Probab., 7, 75 766. Dickson, D.C.M. and Egídio dos Reis, A.D. (1997) The effect of interest on negative surplus. Insurance Math. Econom., 21, 1 16. Doney, C.M. (1991) Hitting probability for spectrally positive Lévy process. J. London Math. Soc., 44, 566 576. Egídio dos Reis, A.D. (1993) How long is the surplus below zero? Insurance Math. Econom., 12, 23 38. Egídio dos Reis, A.D. (2) On the moments of ruin and recovery times. Insurance Math. Econom., 27, 331 343. Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C. and Mikosch, T. (1997) Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Emery, D.J. (1973) Exit problem for a spectrally positive process. Adv. Appl. Probab., 5, 498 52. Gerber, H.U. (197) An extension of the renewal equation and its application in the collective theory of risk. Skand. Aktuarietidskrift, 53, 25 21. Gerber, H.U. (199) When does the surplus reach a given target? Insurance Math. Econom., 9, 115 119. Kyprianou, A.E. and Palmowski, Z. (25) A martingale review of some fluctuation theory for spectrally negative Lévy processes. In M. Émery, M. Ledoux and M. Yor (eds), Séminaire de Probabilités XXXVIII, Lecture Notes in Math. 1857, pp. 16 29, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Picard, P. and Lefèvre, C. (1994) On the 1st crossing of the surplus process with a given upper barrier. Insurance Math. Econom., 14, 163 179. Prabhu, N.U. (197) Ladder variables for a continuous stochastic process. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeits theorie Verw. Geb., 16, 157 164. Rogers, L.C.G. (199) The two-sided exit problem for spectrally positive Lévy processes. Adv. Appl. Probab., 22, 486 487. Rogers, L.C.G. (2) Evaluating first-passage probabilities for spectrally one-sided Lévy processes. J. Appl. Probab., 37, 1173 118. Rogozin, B.A. (1965) On distributions of functionals related to boundary problems for processes with independent increments. Theory Probab. Appl., 11, 58 591. Rolski, T., Schmidli, H., Schmidt, V. and Teugels, J. (1999) Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance. New York: Wiley. Yang, H. and Zhang, L. (21) Spectrally negative Lévy processes with applications in risk theory. Adv. Appl. Probab., 33, 281 291. Zhang, C. and Wu, R. (22) Total duration of negative surplus for the compound Poisson process that is perturbed by diffusion. J. Appl. Probab., 39, 517 532. Zolotarev, C.M. (1964) The first passage time of a level and the behavior at infinity for a class of processes with independent increments. Theory Probab. Appl., 9, 653 661. Received September 23 and revised August 24