So in the abstract setting dene the following: f n converges to f with respect to I i every subsequence ff n : n 2 Ag has a subsequence B A such that

Similar documents
Baire measures on uncountable product spaces 1. Abstract. We show that assuming the continuum hypothesis there exists a

Compact subsets of the Baire space

Ultrafilters with property (s)

The onto mapping property of Sierpinski

Uniquely Universal Sets

On the Length of Borel Hierarchies

Convergence and submeasures in Boolean algebras

ON DENSITY TOPOLOGIES WITH RESPECT

SELF-DUAL UNIFORM MATROIDS ON INFINITE SETS

The axiom of choice and two-point sets in the plane

Set theoretic properties of Loeb measure 2. Abstract. In this paper we ask the question: to what extent do basic set

On the Length of Borel Hierarchies

SOME ADDITIVE DARBOUX LIKE FUNCTIONS

ON SOME SUBCLASSES OF THE FAMILY OF DARBOUX BAIRE 1 FUNCTIONS. Gertruda Ivanova and Elżbieta Wagner-Bojakowska

WHEN AN ATOMIC AND COMPLETE ALGEBRA OF SETS IS A FIELD OF SETS WITH NOWHERE DENSE BOUNDARY

SMALL SUBSETS OF THE REALS AND TREE FORCING NOTIONS

The ideal of Sierpiński-Zygmund sets on the plane

Weak Choice Principles and Forcing Axioms

Vitali sets and Hamel bases that are Marczewski measurable

Distributivity of the algebra of regular open subsets of βr \ R

On the open-open game

Souslin s Hypothesis

GREGORY TREES, THE CONTINUUM, AND MARTIN S AXIOM

FINITE BOREL MEASURES ON SPACES OF CARDINALITY LESS THAN c

DENSELY k-separable COMPACTA ARE DENSELY SEPARABLE

arxiv: v1 [math.gn] 27 Oct 2018

Uncountable γ-sets under axiom CPA game

Spaces of continuous functions

Covering Property Axiom CPA cube and its consequences

A G δ IDEAL OF COMPACT SETS STRICTLY ABOVE THE NOWHERE DENSE IDEAL IN THE TUKEY ORDER

On a Question of Maarten Maurice

Diagonalize This. Iian Smythe. Department of Mathematics Cornell University. Olivetti Club November 26, 2013

TOPOLOGICAL ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE IN THE DENSITY TOPOLOGY AND ON SOUSLIN LINES

On Convergence of Sequences of Measurable Functions

Maharam Algebras. Equipe de Logique, Université de Paris 7, 2 Place Jussieu, Paris, France

NAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination. Answer Key

The topology of ultrafilters as subspaces of 2 ω

A NEW LINDELOF SPACE WITH POINTS G δ

MONOTONICALLY COMPACT AND MONOTONICALLY

int cl int cl A = int cl A.

REAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS

Computability Theory

Totally supra b continuous and slightly supra b continuous functions

Countable subgroups of Euclidean space

Chain Conditions of Horn and Tarski

S. Mrówka introduced a topological space ψ whose underlying set is the. natural numbers together with an infinite maximal almost disjoint family(madf)

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 11 Solutions

Section Signed Measures: The Hahn and Jordan Decompositions

A BOREL SOLUTION TO THE HORN-TARSKI PROBLEM. MSC 2000: 03E05, 03E20, 06A10 Keywords: Chain Conditions, Boolean Algebras.

Sacks forcing, Laver forcing, and Martin s Axiom 1

COMPACT SPACES WITH HEREDITARILY NORMAL SQUARES

Models in which every nonmeager set is nonmeager in a nowhere dense Cantor set arxiv:math/ v1 [math.lo] 25 Nov 2003

and are based on the precise formulation of the (vague) concept of closeness. Traditionally,

theory see Chang and Keisler [CK], for background in nonstandard universes and the Loeb measure see Stroyan and Bayod [SB], for standard Sierpinski se

Problem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

The Proper Forcing Axiom: a tutorial

Wojciech Stadnicki. On Laver extension. Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Praca semestralna nr 2 (semestr letni 2010/11) Opiekun pracy: Janusz Pawlikowski

Genericity: A Measure Theoretic Analysis

arxiv:math.gn/ v1 6 Dec 2003

Von Neumann s Problem

Fragmentability and σ-fragmentability

Descriptive Set Theory and Forcing:

Topological Algebraic Structure on Souslin and Aronszajn Lines

A NEW CLASS OF RAMSEY-CLASSIFICATION THEOREMS AND THEIR APPLICATION IN THE TUKEY THEORY OF ULTRAFILTERS, PART 1

Increasing δ 1 2 and Namba-style forcing

2 Garrett: `A Good Spectral Theorem' 1. von Neumann algebras, density theorem The commutant of a subring S of a ring R is S 0 = fr 2 R : rs = sr; 8s 2

Abian raised the question of what are the possible cardinalities of maximal orthogonal families. Theorem 3 In the Cohen real model there is a maximal

SUBSPACES OF COMPUTABLE VECTOR SPACES

Descriptive graph combinatorics

CCC Forcing and Splitting Reals

CHODOUNSKY, DAVID, M.A. Relative Topological Properties. (2006) Directed by Dr. Jerry Vaughan. 48pp.

Homework 1 Solutions ECEn 670, Fall 2013

PREVALENCE OF SOME KNOWN TYPICAL PROPERTIES. 1. Introduction

On Better-Quasi-Ordering Countable Series-Parallel Orders

M ath. Res. Lett. 15 (2008), no. 00, NN c International Press 2008 A UNIVERSAL ARONSZAJN LINE. Justin Tatch Moore. 1.

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Independence of Boolean algebras and forcing

Utility Representation of Lower Separable Preferences

Compactifications of Discrete Spaces

Generic Absoluteness. Joan Bagaria and Sy D. Friedman. Abstract. However, this is not true for 1 3 predicates. Indeed, if we add a Cohen real

FUNCTIONS WITH MANY LOCAL EXTREMA. 1. introduction

Lebesgue measure on R is just one of many important measures in mathematics. In these notes we introduce the general framework for measures.

Lusin sequences under CH and under Martin s Axiom

ALGEBRAIC SUMS OF SETS IN MARCZEWSKI BURSTIN ALGEBRAS

Topology Proceedings. COPYRIGHT c by Topology Proceedings. All rights reserved.

Irredundant Generators

LIMITS OF DIFFERENTIABLE FUNCTIONS

Borel cardinals and Ramsey ultrafilters (draft of Sections 1-3)

Innite Combinatorics and Denability 1

FORCING AXIOMS AND THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS, PART II: TRANSCENDING ω 1 -SEQUENCES OF REAL NUMBERS

Adam Kwela. Instytut Matematyczny PAN SELECTIVE PROPERTIES OF IDEALS ON COUNTABLE SETS. Praca semestralna nr 3 (semestr letni 2011/12)

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall F(x) = 1 x. f(t)dt. t 1 2. tf 2 (t)dt. and g(t, x) = 2 t. 2 t

A product of γ-sets which is not Menger.

An introduction to OCA

Axioms for Set Theory

Real Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller

1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3

Categoricity Without Equality

The Measure Problem. Louis de Branges Department of Mathematics Purdue University West Lafayette, IN , USA

Transcription:

Souslin's Hypothesis and Convergence in Category by Arnold W. Miller 1 Abstract: A sequence of functions f n : X! R from a Baire space X to the reals R is said to converge in category i every subsequence has a subsequence which converges on all but a meager set. We show that if there exists a Souslin Tree, then there exists a nonatomic Baire space X such that every sequence which converges in category converges everywhere on a comeager set. This answers a question of Wagner and Wilczynski who proved the converse. Suppose that S P (X) is a -eld of subsets of X and I S is a -ideal. If I has the countable chain condition (ccc), i.e., every family of disjoint sets in S n I is countable, then S=I is a complete boolean algebra. A boolean algebra is atomic i there is an atom beneath every nonzero element. A function f : X! R is S-measurable i f 1 (U) 2 S for every open set U. A sequence of S-measurable functions f n : X! R converges I-a.e. to a function f i there exists A 2 I such that f n (x)! f(x) for all x 2 (X n A). If (X; S; ) is a nite measure space, then a sequence of measurable functions f n : X! R converges in measure to a function f i for any > 0 there exists N such that for any n > N: (fx 2 X : jf n (x) f(x)j > g) < : In this case if I is the ideal of measure zero sets, then f n converges to f in measure i every subsequence ff n : n 2 Ag (where A N) has a subsequence B A such that ff n : n 2 Bg converges I-a.e. This allows us to dene convergence in measure without mentioning the measure, only the ideal I. 1 I want to thank Krzysztof Ciesielski for many helpful conversations. The results presented in this paper were obtained during the Joint US{Polish Workshop in Real Analysis, Lodz, Poland, July 1994. The Workshop was partially supported by the NSF grant INT{9401673. AMS Subject Classication. Primary: 28A20; Secondary: 03E65, 54E52. This appears in Proceedings of American Mathematical Society, 124(1996), 1529-1532. 1

So in the abstract setting dene the following: f n converges to f with respect to I i every subsequence ff n : n 2 Ag has a subsequence B A such that ff n : n 2 Bg converges I-a.e. (where A and B range over innite sets of natural numbers.) For more background on this subject in case I is the ideal of meager sets, see Poreda, Wagner-Bojakoska, and Wilczynski [PWW] and Ciesielski, Larson, and Ostaszewski [CLO]. Marczewski [M] showed that if (X; S; ) is an atomic measure and I the -null sets, then `I-a.e. convergence' is the same as `convergence with respect to I'. Gribanov [G] proved the converse, if (X; S; ) is a nite measure space and I the -null sets, then if `I-a.e. convergence' is the same as `convergence with respect to I' then is an atomic measure. Souslin's Hypothesis (SH) is the statement that there are no Souslin lines. It is known to be independent (see Solovay and Tennenbaum [ST]). It was the inspiration for Martin's Axiom. Theorem 1 (Wagner and Wilczynski [WW]) Assume SH. Then for any - eld S and ccc -ideal I S the following are equivalent: `I-a.e. convergence' is the same as `convergence with respect to I' for S-measurable sequences of real-valued functions, and the complete boolean algebra S=I is atomic. At the real analysis meeting in Lodz Poland in July 94, Wilczynski asked whether or not SH is needed for the Theorem above. We show here that the conclusion of Theorem 1 implies Souslin's Hypothesis. Theorem 2 Suppose SH is false (so there exists a Souslin tree). Then there exists a regular topological space X such that 1. X has no isolated points, 2. X is ccc (every family of disjoint open sets is countable), 3. every nonempty open subset of X is nonmeager, and 4. if I is the -ideal of meager subsets of X, then `I-a.e. convergence' is the same as `convergence with respect to I' for any sequence of Baire measurable real-valued functions. 2

Hence if S is the -ideal of sets with the property of Baire and I the -ideal of meager sets, then S=I is ccc and nonatomic, but the two types of convergence are the same. Proof: Dene (T; <) to be an! 1 -tree i it is a partial order and for each s 2 T the set ft 2 T : t < sg is well-ordered by < with some countable order type, <! 1. We let Also T = fs 2 T : ft 2 T : t < sg has order type g: T < = [ ft : < g: Dene C T is a chain i for every s; t 2 C either s t or t s. Dene A T is an antichain i for any s; t 2 A if s t, then s = t, i.e. distinct elements are -incomparable. Dene T is a Souslin tree i T is an! 1 tree in which every chain and antichain is countable. (Note that since T is an antichain it must be countable.) SH is equivalent to saying there is no Souslin tree. Every Souslin tree contains a normal Souslin tree, i.e., a Souslin tree T such that for every < <! 1 and s 2 T there exists a t 2 T with s < t. (Just throw out nodes of T which do not have extensions arbitrarily high in the tree.) For more on Souslin trees see Todorcevic [T]. Now we are ready to dene our space X. Let the elements of X be maximal chains of T. For each s 2 T let and let C s = fb 2 X : s 2 bg fc s : s 2 T g be an open basis for the topology on X. Note that C s \ C t is either empty or equal to either C s or C t depending on whether s and t are incomparable, or t s or s t, respectively. Each C s is clopen since its complement is the union of C t for t which are incomparable to s. X has no isolated points, since given any s 2 T there must be incomparable extensions of s (because T is normal) and therefore at least two maximal chains containing s, so C s is not a singleton. Clearly X has the countable chain condition. 3

Lemma 3 Open subsets of X are nonmeager. In fact, the intersection of countably many open dense sets contains an open dense set. Proof: The proof is quite standard and can be found in the reference books: Kunen [K] or Jech [J]. For the convenience of the reader we include it. Suppose (U n : n 2!) is a sequence of an open dense subsets of X. Let A n T be an antichain which is maximal with respect to the property that C s U n for each s 2 A n. Since U n is open dense in X, A n will be a maximal antichain in T. Let V n = [ fc s : s 2 A n g: Then V n U n and V n is open dense. (It is dense, because given any C t there exists s 2 A n and r 2 T with t r and s r, hence C r V n \ C t.) Choose <! 1 so that for each n 2! the (necessarily countable) antichain A n T <. Let [ U = fc s : s 2 T g: Note that since T is normal U is \ an open dense \ set. Also U V n U n : n<! (U V n because for any b 2 U if b 2 C s for some s 2 T there must be t 2 A n comparable to it, since A n is a maximal antichain, and since A n T <, it must be that t < s and so b 2 C t V n. Lemma 4 Suppose f : X! R is a real valued Baire function. Then there exists <! 1 such that for each s 2 T the function f is constant on C s. Proof: Let B be a countable open basis for R. For each B 2 B the set f 1 (B) has the property of Baire (open modulo meager). So there exists an open U B such that U B f 1 (B) is meager. n<! By the proof of Lemma 3 we may assume that U B = [ fc s : s 2 A B g for some countable set A B <! 1 such that T. By the proof of Lemma 3 there exists an 4

each A B T < and S if U is the open dense set fc s U B f 1 (B) for each B 2 B. : s 2 T g, then U is disjoint from But now, f is constant on each C s for s 2 T. Otherwise, suppose that f(b) 6= f(c) for some b; c 2 C s for some s 2 T. Then suppose that f(b) 2 B and f(c) =2 B for some B 2 B. Because b 2 (f 1 (B) \ U) and U is disjoint from U B f 1 (B), it must be that b 2 U B. Hence there exists t 2 T < such that C t U B and b 2 C t. Since t < s it must be that c 2 C t and so c 2 f 1 (B), which contradicts f(c) =2 B. Steprans [S] shows that every continuous function on a Souslin tree takes on only countably many values. Lemma 5 Suppose ff n : X! R : n 2!g is a countable set of real valued Baire functions. Then there exists <! 1 such that for each s 2 T and n <! the function f n is constant on C s. Proof: Apply Lemma 4 countably many times and take the supremum of the n. Finally, we prove the theorem. The idea of the proof is to use the argument of the atomic case, where the `atoms' are supplied by Lemma 5. Since `I-a.e. convergence' always implies `convergence with respect to I', it is enough to see the converse. So let f n : X! R be Baire functions which converge to f : X! R with respect to I, i.e. every subsequence has a subsequence which converges on a comeager set to f. By Lemma 5 there exists <! 1 such that for each s 2 T and n <! the function f n is constant on C s. Since every subsequence has a convergent subsequence, it must be that for each xed s 2 T the constant values of f n on C s converge to a constant value. It follows that the sequence f n (x) converges to f(x) on the dense open set fc s : s 2 T g. References 5

[CLO] K.Ciesielski, L.Larson, and K.Ostaszewski, I-Density Continuous Functions, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 107(1994). [G] J.M.Gribanov, Remark on convergence a.e. and convergence in measure, Comm. Math. Univ Carolinae, 7(1966), 297-300. [K] K.Kunen, Set Theory, North-Holland, 1980. [J] T.Jech, Set Theory, Academic Press, 1978. [M] E.Marczewski, Remarks on the the convergence of measurable sets and measurable functions, Colloquium Mathematica, 3(1955), 118-124. [PWW] W.Poreda, E.Wagner-Bojakoska, and W.Wilczynski, A category analogue of the density topology, Fundamenta Mathematicae, 125(1985), 167-173. [S] J.Steprans, Trees and continuous mappings into the real line, Topology and Its Applications, 12(1981), 181-185. [ST] R.M.Solovay, S.Tennenbaum, Iterated Cohen extensions and Souslin's problem, Annals of Mathematics, 94(1971), 201-245. [T] S.Todorcevic, Trees and linearly ordered sets, in Handbook of Set Theoretic Topology, North-Holland, (1984), 235-293. [WW] E.Wagner, W.Wilczynski, Convergence of sequences of measurable functions, Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 36(1980), 125-128. Address: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Mathematics, Van Vleck Hall, 480 Lincoln Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1388, USA. e-mail: miller@math.wisc.edu November 94 revised March 95, January 96 6