Particle lter for mobile robot tracking and localisation

Similar documents
Introduction to Mobile Robotics Bayes Filter Particle Filter and Monte Carlo Localization

Sensor Fusion: Particle Filter

2D Image Processing (Extended) Kalman and particle filter

Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filtering for 6-DOF Estimation of Attitude and Position via GPS and Inertial Sensors

L09. PARTICLE FILTERING. NA568 Mobile Robotics: Methods & Algorithms

CIS 390 Fall 2016 Robotics: Planning and Perception Final Review Questions

Robotics. Lecture 4: Probabilistic Robotics. See course website for up to date information.

Local Positioning with Parallelepiped Moving Grid

Markov localization uses an explicit, discrete representation for the probability of all position in the state space.

The Kalman Filter ImPr Talk

Robotics. Mobile Robotics. Marc Toussaint U Stuttgart

Particle Filters. Outline

Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for visual tracking

Dynamic Multipath Estimation by Sequential Monte Carlo Methods

Kalman filtering and friends: Inference in time series models. Herke van Hoof slides mostly by Michael Rubinstein

Content.

PATTERN RECOGNITION AND MACHINE LEARNING CHAPTER 13: SEQUENTIAL DATA

Human Pose Tracking I: Basics. David Fleet University of Toronto

Introduction to Mobile Robotics Probabilistic Robotics

Robot Localisation. Henrik I. Christensen. January 12, 2007

CSE 473: Artificial Intelligence

The Kalman Filter (part 1) Definition. Rudolf Emil Kalman. Why do we need a filter? Definition. HCI/ComS 575X: Computational Perception.

TSRT14: Sensor Fusion Lecture 8

Localization. Howie Choset Adapted from slides by Humphrey Hu, Trevor Decker, and Brad Neuman

Gaussian Processes for Sequential Prediction

A Comparison of the EKF, SPKF, and the Bayes Filter for Landmark-Based Localization

Computer Vision Group Prof. Daniel Cremers. 11. Sampling Methods

Autonomous Mobile Robot Design

Bayes Filter Reminder. Kalman Filter Localization. Properties of Gaussians. Gaussians. Prediction. Correction. σ 2. Univariate. 1 2πσ e.

Modeling and state estimation Examples State estimation Probabilities Bayes filter Particle filter. Modeling. CSC752 Autonomous Robotic Systems

Particle Filters. Pieter Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS. Many slides adapted from Thrun, Burgard and Fox, Probabilistic Robotics

Recursive Bayes Filtering

Bayesian Methods in Positioning Applications

Computer Vision Group Prof. Daniel Cremers. 14. Sampling Methods

Lecture 2: From Linear Regression to Kalman Filter and Beyond

AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENT SENSORS

Parallel Particle Filter in Julia

1 Kalman Filter Introduction

Mobile Robot Localization

EKF and SLAM. McGill COMP 765 Sept 18 th, 2017

Linear Dynamical Systems

Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) Corso di Robotica Prof. Davide Brugali Università degli Studi di Bergamo

Why do we care? Measurements. Handling uncertainty over time: predicting, estimating, recognizing, learning. Dealing with time

Towards a Bayesian model for Cyber Security

PROBABILISTIC REASONING OVER TIME

Hidden Markov Models. Vibhav Gogate The University of Texas at Dallas

Approximate Inference

Using the Kalman Filter to Estimate the State of a Maneuvering Aircraft

EVALUATING SYMMETRIC INFORMATION GAP BETWEEN DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS USING PARTICLE FILTER

A Probabilistic Relational Model for Characterizing Situations in Dynamic Multi-Agent Systems

Particle Filters; Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (Intelligent Autonomous Robotics) Subramanian Ramamoorthy School of Informatics

Kalman Filter Computer Vision (Kris Kitani) Carnegie Mellon University

Lecture 7: Optimal Smoothing

Autonomous Mobile Robot Design

Data Fusion Kalman Filtering Self Localization

The Unscented Particle Filter

Organization. I MCMC discussion. I project talks. I Lecture.

Mobile Robot Localization

ECE276A: Sensing & Estimation in Robotics Lecture 10: Gaussian Mixture and Particle Filtering

SEQUENTIAL MONTE CARLO METHODS WITH APPLICATIONS TO COMMUNICATION CHANNELS. A Thesis SIRISH BODDIKURAPATI

Robotics 2 Target Tracking. Kai Arras, Cyrill Stachniss, Maren Bennewitz, Wolfram Burgard

The Particle Filter. PD Dr. Rudolph Triebel Computer Vision Group. Machine Learning for Computer Vision

Introduction to Machine Learning

Censoring and Fusion in Non-linear Distributed Tracking Systems with Application to 2D Radar

Hidden Markov Models. Hal Daumé III. Computer Science University of Maryland CS 421: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence 19 Apr 2012

A Monte Carlo Sequential Estimation for Point Process Optimum Filtering

Introduction to Unscented Kalman Filter

Gaussian Process Regression: Active Data Selection and Test Point. Rejection. Sambu Seo Marko Wallat Thore Graepel Klaus Obermayer

Why do we care? Examples. Bayes Rule. What room am I in? Handling uncertainty over time: predicting, estimating, recognizing, learning

CSEP 573: Artificial Intelligence

Probabilistic Fundamentals in Robotics. DAUIN Politecnico di Torino July 2010

Results: MCMC Dancers, q=10, n=500

Motion Models (cont) 1 2/15/2012

L11. EKF SLAM: PART I. NA568 Mobile Robotics: Methods & Algorithms

Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Stochastic Optimization

Target Tracking and Classification using Collaborative Sensor Networks

Sensor Tasking and Control

Gaussian Process Approximations of Stochastic Differential Equations

Announcements. CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall VPI Example. VPI Properties. Reasoning over Time. Markov Models. Lecture 19: HMMs 11/4/2008

Particle Filtering Approaches for Dynamic Stochastic Optimization

Introduction to Particle Filters for Data Assimilation

Markov Models. CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall Example. Mini-Forward Algorithm. Stationary Distributions.

Kalman Filters, Dynamic Bayesian Networks

Lagrangian Data Assimilation and Manifold Detection for a Point-Vortex Model. David Darmon, AMSC Kayo Ide, AOSC, IPST, CSCAMM, ESSIC

RAO-BLACKWELLISED PARTICLE FILTERS: EXAMPLES OF APPLICATIONS

Implementation of Particle Filter-based Target Tracking

Bayesian Inference and MCMC

A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF PARTICLE FILTERS FOR MOBILE STATION RECEIVERS. Michael Lunglmayr, Martin Krueger, Mario Huemer

Introduction to Mobile Robotics Probabilistic Motion Models

REGLERTEKNIK AUTOMATIC CONTROL LINKÖPING

Bayesian Methods / G.D. Hager S. Leonard

Expectation propagation for signal detection in flat-fading channels

Sequential Monte Carlo Methods for Bayesian Computation

Probabilistic Fundamentals in Robotics

CS 343: Artificial Intelligence

L06. LINEAR KALMAN FILTERS. NA568 Mobile Robotics: Methods & Algorithms

Terrain Navigation Using the Ambient Magnetic Field as a Map

State Estimation using Moving Horizon Estimation and Particle Filtering

Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs)

Self Adaptive Particle Filter

Transcription:

Particle lter for mobile robot tracking and localisation Tinne De Laet K.U.Leuven, Dept. Werktuigkunde 19 oktober 2005 Particle lter 1

Overview Goal Introduction Particle lter Simulations Particle lter 2

Goal I To make a tutorial about a particle lter for AI I Comparable with the kalman lter tutorial I This tutorial shows the possible application of a Monte Carlo Simulation method (particle lter) for mobile robot tracking and localisation I Basic particle lter Particle lter 3

Overview Goal Introduction General The Bayesian approach Particle lter Simulations Particle lter 4

General I Problem: estimate the state of a system that changes over time using sequence of noisy measurements I Two models required: I System model I Measurement model I If the models are in probablistic form the Bayesian approach is ideally suited Particle lter 5

The Bayesian approach I Approach provides a rigorous general framework for dynamic state estimation problems I Construct the construct the posterior probability density function (pdf) of the state based on all available information including measurements I The "complete"solution to the estimation problem I An optimal (with respect to any criterion) estimate of the state may be obtained from the pdf Particle lter 6

Overview Goal Introduction Particle lter General Model description Prediction Resampling Update Numerical aspects/algorithmic details Estimate Particle lter 7

General I Objective: 'track' a variable of interest I Can typically non-gaussian and multi-model pdf $ Kalman lter I Key idea: represent the required pdf by a set of ramdom samples with associated weights and compute estimates based on these samples and weights I Basis: I construct a sample-based representation of the entire pdf I actions modifying the state of the variable of interest according to the models I observation is made ) information about the variables Particle lter 8

General: Importance sampling I Weigths of the samples are chosen using the principle of /emphimportance sampling I p(x) / (x) x i q(x) with q(x) the importance density I Weighted approximation to p(x): p(x) P N s i=1 w i (x k 0:k x i ) with w i / (x i ) 0:k q(x i ) I The Sequential Importance Sampling algorithm (SIS) supports recursive propagation of weights and support points Particle lter 9

General: Importance sampling I Here the importance sampling function is chosen equal to the prior calculated in the prediction step I ) w i k = w i k 1 P(z kjx k ) {z } measurement model ) Application of the proces model on the samples are samples of the proposal density I Most obvious and most easy to understand choice. Particle lter 10

Model description I State: x k y k k T Particle lter 11

Model description I Proces model I every motion modeled as rst a rotation around axis followed by a translation Particle lter 12

Model description I Rotation: k+1 = k + + N(M rot ; rot ) with = atan y x I Translation: Two sources of error: the actual traveled distance and the changes in orientation during the forward translation (=drift) k+1 = k + + N(M drft ; drft ) x k+1 = x k + ( + N(M trs ; trs )) cos( k+1 ) y k+1 = y k + ( + N(M trs ; trs )) sin( k+1 ) k+1 = k + + N(M drft ; drft ) Particle lter 13

Model description I Measurement model I US-sensor: z k = p 2a a 2 +1 x k + p 2 a 2 +1 atan y k + y k ys x k xs p 2b + a 2 m +1 I RF-sensor: 0 q 1 (x z k = = @ k x s ) 2 + (y k y s ) 2 A k Particle lter 14

Prediction I Uses the proces model (rotation and translation) to simulate the eect of hte action on the set of particles I Add the apropriate noise to simulate the eect of noise on the variables of interest Particle lter 15

Resampling I To prevent the depletion of the population I The eective sample size (ESS) indicates the eectiveness of the particles I If ESS < x:m with M = number of particles ) Resample I Resampling eliminates the particles with smaller weigths and duplicates the ones with higher weights in a probablistic way I Three resampling algorithms I Select with replacement I Linear time resampling I Resampling by Liu et al. Particle lter 16

Update I Reevaluate the weight of the particles based on the latest sensory information available I Thanks the the information obtained from the sensor the pdf can be described more accurately Particle lter 17

Numerical aspects/algorithmic details I Normalize the weights Particle lter 18

I Dierent options I The best particle: x s = xs max I Weighted mean: x s = P M j=1 x j w j I Robust mean: x s = P K Estimate with x max s = x i j w i = max (w j ) j=1 x j w j j jx j xs max j 6 Particle lter 19

Overview Goal Introduction Particle lter Simulations Tracking Localisation Particle lter 20

Tracking I Prediction I Initial: known pose I Uncertainty: traveled distance and angle during translation Example 1 memory I Example 2 I Initial: known pose I Uncertainty: angle during translation I Example 2 I Example 3 I Initial: known pose I Uncertainty: translation distance I Example 3 Particle lter 21

Tracking I US measurement I Initial: known pose I Uncertainty: traveled distance and angle during translation I RF measurement I Initial: known pose I Uncertainty: traveled distance and angle during translation Particle lter 22

Tracking I US and RF measurement I Initial: known pose I Uncertainty: traveled distance and angle during translation Particle lter 23

Localisation I US measurement I Initial: unknown pose I Uncertainty: traveled distance, angle during translation, rotation angle I RF measurement I Initial: unknown position, known orientation I Uncertainty: traveled distance, angle during translation, rotation angle I Example 2 I Initial: unknown pose I Uncertainty: traveled distance, angle during translation, rotation angle I Example 2 Particle lter 24

Localisation I US and RF measurement I Initial: unknown position, known orientation I Uncertainty: traveled distance, angle during translation, rotation angle I Example 2 I Initial: unknown pose I Uncertainty: traveled distance, angle during translation, rotation angle I Example 2 I Example 3 I Initial: unknown position, known orientation I Uncertainty: traveled distance, angle during translation, rotation angle I Example 3 Particle lter 25

Particle lter 26