Accessible model structures

Similar documents
Algebraic model structures

AN INTRODUCTION TO MODEL CATEGORIES

LEFT-INDUCED MODEL STRUCTURES AND DIAGRAM CATEGORIES

Cellularity, composition, and morphisms of algebraic weak factorization systems

Algebraic model structures

in path component sheaves, and the diagrams

arxiv: v2 [math.at] 18 Sep 2008

New York Journal of Mathematics. Algebraic model structures

ENRICHED MODEL CATEGORIES IN EQUIVARIANT CONTEXTS

ON THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF ENRICHED CATEGORIES

ENRICHED MODEL CATEGORIES AND PRESHEAF CATEGORIES

Kathryn Hess. Conference on Algebraic Topology, Group Theory and Representation Theory Isle of Skye 9 June 2009

arxiv: v1 [math.at] 17 Apr 2008

Homotopy Theory of Topological Spaces and Simplicial Sets

THE HEART OF A COMBINATORIAL MODEL CATEGORY

Algebraic models for higher categories

Algebraic models of homotopy type theory

arxiv: v1 [math.at] 18 Nov 2015

ON THE COFIBRANT GENERATION OF MODEL CATEGORIES arxiv: v1 [math.at] 16 Jul 2009

An introduction to stable homotopy theory. Abelian groups up to homotopy spectra ()generalized cohomology theories

2 BROOKE SHIPLEY up to homotopy" information as differential graded R-algebras. Verifying this conjecture is the subject of this paper. To formulate t

Algebraic models for higher categories

An Introduction to Model Categories

Higher Prop(erad)s. Philip Hackney, Marcy Robertson*, and Donald Yau UCLA. July 1, 2014

On Obstructions to Realizing Diagrams of Π-algebras


HOMOTOPY THEORY OF MODULES OVER OPERADS AND NON-Σ OPERADS IN MONOIDAL MODEL CATEGORIES

MADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS

Kathryn Hess. Category Theory, Algebra and Geometry Université Catholique de Louvain 27 May 2011

Graduate algebraic K-theory seminar

T -spectra. Rick Jardine. March 2, University of Western Ontario

Loday construction in functor categories

AXIOMS FOR GENERALIZED FARRELL-TATE COHOMOLOGY

INDUCTIVE PRESENTATIONS OF GENERALIZED REEDY CATEGORIES. Contents. 1. The algebraic perspective on Reedy categories

MODEL STRUCTURES ON PRO-CATEGORIES

FINITE SPECTRA CARY MALKIEWICH

SPECTRAL ENRICHMENTS OF MODEL CATEGORIES

ON THE DERIVED CATEGORY OF AN ALGEBRA OVER AN OPERAD. Dedicated to Mamuka Jibladze on the occasion of his 50th birthday

ON LEFT AND RIGHT MODEL CATEGORIES AND LEFT AND RIGHT BOUSFIELD LOCALIZATIONS

Commutative ring objects in pro-categories and generalized Moore spectra

Waldhausen Additivity and Approximation in Quasicategorical K-Theory

Homotopy theory of spectral categories

Model Structures on the Category of Small Double Categories

Autour de la Géométrie Algébrique Dérivée

Moduli Problems for Structured Ring Spectra

Kathryn Hess. International Conference on K-theory and Homotopy Theory Santiago de Compostela, 17 September 2008

Algebras and modules in monoidal model categories

CGP DERIVED SEMINAR GABRIEL C. DRUMMOND-COLE

Derivatives of the identity functor and operads

MONOIDAL ALGEBRAIC MODEL STRUCTURES

arxiv: v1 [math.at] 15 Nov 2018

Motivic Spaces with Proper Support

MODEL CATEGORIES OF DIAGRAM SPECTRA

Graph stable equivalences and operadic constructions in equivariant spectra

Commutative ring objects in pro-categories and generalized Moore spectra

POSTNIKOV EXTENSIONS OF RING SPECTRA

LOOP SPACES IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY. A Dissertation MARVIN GLEN DECKER

Algebraic Topology (topics course) Spring 2010 John E. Harper. Series 6

The positive complete model structure and why we need it

AN ALGEBRAIC MODEL FOR RATIONAL TORUS-EQUIVARIANT SPECTRA. Contents. Part 1. Overview Introduction Outline of the argument.

Symmetric Spectra and Topological Hochschild Homology

Postnikov extensions of ring spectra

QUILLEN MODEL STRUCTURES FOR RELATIVE HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA

Cohomology operations and the Steenrod algebra

ON THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF ENRICHED CATEGORIES

Errata to Model Categories by Mark Hovey

POSTNIKOV TOWERS OF COMMUTATIVE S-ALGEBRAS

HOMOTOPY THEORY OF S-BIMODULES, NAIVE RING SPECTRA AND STABLE MODEL CATEGORIES

Geometric symmetric powers in the homotopy categories of schemes over a field

LOCALIZATION, UNIVERSAL PROPERTIES, AND HOMOTOPY THEORY

The homotopy theory of dg-categories and derived Morita theory

Elmendorf s Theorem via Model Categories

Koszul duality for operads

A CLOSED MODEL CATEGORY FOR (n 1)-CONNECTED SPACES

THE CELLULARIZATION PRINCIPLE FOR QUILLEN ADJUNCTIONS

arxiv: v6 [math.ct] 2 Jul 2015

The formal theory of adjunctions, monads, algebras, and descent

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 21 Aug 2001

MODULES OVER OPERADS AND FUNCTORS. Benoit Fresse

arxiv: v2 [math.at] 29 Nov 2007

Two results from Morita theory of stable model categories

INTEGRAL CHAINS AND BOUSFIELD-KAN COMPLETION

Universität Regensburg Mathematik

A UNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR STABLE HOMOTOPY THEORY

Categorical models of homotopy type theory

MODEL STRUCTURES ON MODULES OVER DING-CHEN RINGS

Model categories in equivariant rational homotopy theory

arxiv: v1 [math.kt] 5 Aug 2016

OVERVIEW OF SPECTRA. Contents

HOMOTOPY THEORY FOR ALGEBRAS OVER POLYNOMIAL MONADS

BOUSFIELD LOCALIZATION AND ALGEBRAS OVER OPERADS

BERTRAND GUILLOU. s G q+r

HOMOTOPY COMPLETION AND TOPOLOGICAL QUILLEN HOMOLOGY OF STRUCTURED RING SPECTRA

THE EILENBERG-WATTS THEOREM IN HOMOTOPICAL ALGEBRA

Modules over Motivic Cohomology

Lecture 007 (April 13, 2011) Suppose that A is a small abelian category, and let B be a full subcategory such that in every exact sequence

arxiv: v3 [math.at] 17 Jul 2015

LECTURE 6: THE BOUSFIELD-KUHN FUNCTOR

Equivariant orthogonal spectra and S-modules. M.A. Mandell J.P. May

Abstracting away from cell complexes

Transcription:

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Joint work with K. Hess, E. Riehl and B. Shipley September 13, 2016

Plan 1 2 3 4

Model structure Additional structure on a category: allows one to do homotopy theory

Model structure Additional structure on a category: allows one to do homotopy theory A model category (M,F,C,W): bicomplete M a class W + 2-of-3 a pair of weak factorization systems (C W,F) (C,F W)

There are different ways to put a model structure on a category D.

There are different ways to put a model structure on a category D. choose your clasess of maps + prove the axioms (good luck with that)

There are different ways to put a model structure on a category D. choose your clasess of maps + prove the axioms (good luck with that) find a different category M with a model structure and try to use it (transfer it): M L D

Structured objects C L Objects with additional structure in C

Structured objects C For example: L C Objects with additional structure in C L R mod in C

Structured objects C For example: L C Objects with additional structure in C L R mod in C There are classical theorems [Kan, Quillen]: Model structure on C = model structure on R mod in C Important assumption: C cofibrantly generated m.c.

Structured objects, dual situation Dual situation is much more difficult: C Objects with additional structure in C

Structured objects, dual situation Dual situation is much more difficult: C For example: C Objects with additional structure in C R comod in C

Structured objects, dual situation Dual situation is much more difficult: C For example: C Objects with additional structure in C R comod in C Recent theorems based on [Makkai, Rosický]. Important assumption: C cofibrantly generated model category and locally presentable

Structured objects, dual situation Dual situation is much more difficult: C For example: C Objects with additional structure in C R comod in C Recent theorems based on [Makkai, Rosický]. Important assumption: C cofibrantly generated model category and locally presentable Even more difficult: several adjoint pairs from C to Objects with additional structure in C (Bialgebras in C)

Structured objects, dual situation Dual situation is much more difficult: C For example: C Objects with additional structure in C R comod in C Recent theorems based on [Makkai, Rosický]. Important assumption: C cofibrantly generated model category and locally presentable Even more difficult: several adjoint pairs from C to Objects with additional structure in C (Bialgebras in C) We will relax assumption of cofibrantly generated but keep locally presentable

Accessible model structure Locally presentable category - built from a set of objects via colimits (ssets, Ch R, Sp Σ (ssets) but not Top)

Accessible model structure Locally presentable category - built from a set of objects via colimits (ssets, Ch R, Sp Σ (ssets) but not Top) Definition [HKRS] A model structure on a locally presentable category is accessible if it is algebraic and both (functorial) factorisations preserve sufficiently large filtered colimits

Accessible model structure Locally presentable category - built from a set of objects via colimits (ssets, Ch R, Sp Σ (ssets) but not Top) Definition [HKRS] A model structure on a locally presentable category is accessible if it is algebraic and both (functorial) factorisations preserve sufficiently large filtered colimits IMPORTANT: All cofibrantly generated model structures on locally presentable categories are accessible

Accessible model structure Locally presentable category - built from a set of objects via colimits (ssets, Ch R, Sp Σ (ssets) but not Top) Definition [HKRS] A model structure on a locally presentable category is accessible if it is algebraic and both (functorial) factorisations preserve sufficiently large filtered colimits IMPORTANT: All cofibrantly generated model structures on locally presentable categories are accessible Methods to obtain an accessible model structure: via enriched algebraic small object argument [Riehl]

An example Hurewicz model structure on Ch R : W = chain homotopy equivalences C = levelwise split mono F = levelwise split epi Not cofibrantly generated, but accessible.

Transfer (M,F,C,W) model category K M L C C and K are bicomplete.

Transfer (M,F,C,W) model category K M L C C and K are bicomplete. If they exist: right-induced model structure on C: ( 1 F,LLP, 1 W ), left-induced model structure on K: ( RLP, 1 C, 1 W ).

Implications of Burke s and Garner s theorem Suppose (M,F,C,W) is an accessible model category, C and K are locally presentable, and K M L C

Implications of Burke s and Garner s theorem Suppose (M,F,C,W) is an accessible model category, C and K are locally presentable, and K M L C Then there exist weak factorization systems: On K: ( 1 (C),RLP) and ( 1 (C W),RLP) On C: (LLP, 1 (F)) and (LLP, 1 (F W))

Acyclicity theorem [HKRS] Suppose (M,F,C,W) is an accessible model category, C and K are locally presentable, and K M L C. The right-induced model structure exists on C LLP( 1 F) 1 W The left-induced model structure exists on K RLP( 1 C) 1 W

Acyclicity theorem [HKRS] Suppose (M,F,C,W) is an accessible model category, C and K are locally presentable, and K M L C. The right-induced model structure exists on C LLP( 1 F) 1 W The left-induced model structure exists on K RLP( 1 C) 1 W These are again accessible model structures, we can repeat this process! Even cofibrantly generated if M was!

: 2-out of-6 Dual to Quillen s path object argument Square Theorem

2-out of-6 W in any model category satisfy 2-out of-6: A f B g C h D if gf and hg W = f,g,h, and hgf W

Example: right induced to Alg R To check: LLP( 1 F) 1 W L Ch R,Hur Alg R

Example: right induced to Alg R To check: LLP( 1 F) 1 W i : A B LLP( 1 F) L Ch R,Hur Alg R

Example: right induced to Alg R To check: LLP( 1 F) 1 W i : A B LLP( 1 F) L Ch R,Hur Alg R i A B 1W A F (B s 1 B) B i+q 1 F

Example: right induced to Alg R To check: LLP( 1 F) 1 W i : A B LLP( 1 F) L Ch R,Hur Alg R i A B 1W A F (B s 1 B) B i+q 1 F

Example: right induced to Alg R To check: LLP( 1 F) 1 W i : A B LLP( 1 F) L Ch R,Hur Alg R A 1W A F (B s 1 B) i B 2-of-6 = i 1 W B i+q 1 F = the right-induced model structure on Alg R exists

Dual to Quillen s path object argument [HKRS] (M,C,F,W) an accessible model category K locally presentable and K M Define W K := 1 (W) and C K := 1 (C).

Dual to Quillen s path object argument [HKRS] (M,C,F,W) an accessible model category K locally presentable and K M Define W K := 1 (W) and C K := 1 (C). If 1 every object in K is cofibrant and 2 good cylinder objects X X Cyl(X ) X exist in K for all objects X K, then the AC holds on K = the left-induced model structure exists

Example: left induced to Coalg R Coalg R Ch R,Hur

Example: left induced to Coalg R Coalg R Ch R,Hur 1 In Ch R,Hur every object is cofibrant = in Coalg R too 2 We can use cylinder object in Ch R to get cylinder object in Coalg R = the left-induced model structure on Coalg R exists

Square Theorem [HKRS] M,C,K,P locally presentable, (M,C,F,W) a model category M L C K L P If = and if L = L, then there exist id P right P left. id

Square Theorem [HKRS] M,C,K,P locally presentable, (M,C,F,W) a model category M L C right K left L P

Square Theorem [HKRS] M,C,K,P locally presentable, (M,C,F,W) a model category M L C right K left L P If = and if L = L, then there exist id P right id P left

Square Theorem [HKRS] M,C,K,P locally presentable, (M,C,F,W) a model category M L C right K left L P If = and if L = L, then there exist id P right id P left We have a more general version of Square Theorem.

Example: Bialg R We apply Square Theorem to the square Ch R,Hur Coalg R F F Alg R Bialg R = Two model structures on Bialg R Two different m.s. Fibrant/ cofibrant replacements given by Bar-Cobar and Cobar-Bar constructions.

Example: Bialg R We apply Square Theorem to the square Ch R,Hur Coalg R,left F F Alg R,right Bialg R

Example: Bialg R We apply Square Theorem to the square Ch R,Hur Coalg R,left F F Alg R,right Bialg R = Two model structures on Bialg R

Example: Bialg R We apply Square Theorem to the square Ch R,Hur Coalg R,left F F Alg R,right Bialg R = Two model structures on Bialg R Two different model structures. Fibrant / cofibrant replacements given by Bar-Cobar and Cobar-Bar constructions.

Motivic Galois extensions We get model structures on categories of Equivariant motivic spaces : spre(g Sch) and Equivariant motivic spectra: Sp Σ spre(gsch)

Motivic Galois extensions We get model structures on categories of and Equivariant motivic spaces : spre(g Sch) Equivariant motivic spectra: Sp Σ spre(gsch) where fibrant replacement of X is Hom(EG +,X ) or Hom(E G +,X ) needed for Galois extension examples (Joint work with A.Beaudry, K.Hess, M.Merling and.stojanoska).

(Generalized) Reedy R a Reedy category R + a direct wide subcategory R an inverse wide subcategory M obr R M R L L M R+ R M R

(Generalized) Reedy R a Reedy category R + a direct wide subcategory R an inverse wide subcategory M obr R M R L L M R+ R M R Reedy model structure on M R is left-right induced and right-left induced from levelwise model structure on M obr

To sum up...... accessible model structures are great!:

To sum up...... accessible model structures are great!: it is relatively easy to transfer them via left or right adjoints repeatedly.

To sum up...... accessible model structures are great!: it is relatively easy to transfer them via left or right adjoints repeatedly. All you need to check is the acyclicity condition

To sum up...... accessible model structures are great!: it is relatively easy to transfer them via left or right adjoints repeatedly. All you need to check is the acyclicity condition and there are methods to do it!

To sum up...... accessible model structures are great!: it is relatively easy to transfer them via left or right adjoints repeatedly. All you need to check is the acyclicity condition and there are methods to do it! We get many new model structures both in dg and spectral settings... and

To sum up...... accessible model structures are great!: it is relatively easy to transfer them via left or right adjoints repeatedly. All you need to check is the acyclicity condition and there are methods to do it! We get many new model structures both in dg and spectral settings... and We can understand better existing model structures: a Reedy model structure.