Sea Turtle Sightings Per Unit Effort (Fall) Northwest Atlantic United States January 2010

Similar documents
Seabed Forms Northwest Atlantic United States March 2016

Soft sediments by grain size (in mm) Northwest Atlantic United States March 2016

Median surface chlorophyll-a concentration Northwest Atlantic United States March 2016

Shale Plays. File Geodatabase Feature Class. Tags shale plays, basins, gas production, regions

Digital Mapping License Agreement

File Geodatabase Feature Class. Tags platts, price assessement, crude oil, crude, petroleum

File Geodatabase Feature Class. Tags PADD, Petroleum Administration for Defense Districts, regulatory, crude, oil, petroleum

New York City Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs) for 2010 Census

New York City Council Districts Water Included

Lower Density Growth Management Metadata

File Geodatabase Feature Class

AGGREGATE RESOURCES OF ONTARIO (ARO) METADATA

Geospatial Decision Support Tools for Planning of Marine Protected Areas in California

DVRPC's 2010 and 2040 Transit Score

MPA_Inventory_GIS_Database

Offshore Video Survey and Oceanographic Analysis: Georges Bank to the Chesapeake project

U.S. Marine Protected Areas Boundaries: MPA Inventory

Appendix I: Geographic Information System Data Sources

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Geographic information Spatial referencing by coordinates

CUNY Tax Lots, New York NY, Sept 2016

400_scale_tiles(poly)(sp_nad83)

Boreal Surface water inventory - metadata

Boreal Wetland probability - metadata

Fisheries and Oceans Canada Species at Risk. File Geodatabase Feature Class

CWPP_Wildland_Urban_Interface_Boundaries

Boreal Fen probability - metadata

A Geographic Information System Based Model John L Marshall Geography 562 GIS Coastal Resources - Final Project: Fall 2017 University of Washington

MRD273-REV METADATA. Acronyms are Used to Identify the Data Set or Information Holding: MRD273-REV

A Preliminary Home-Range Analysis of Loggerhead Sea Turtles Released in Virginia & North Carolina

Rhode Island Shellfish Management Plan, Version 2, November Appendix C The SMP Use Maps

CHAPTER 7 PRODUCT USE AND AVAILABILITY

Introduction to Part III Examining wildlife distributions and abundance using boat surveys

Lesser Sunda - Banda Seascape Atlas

MRD 228 METADATA. Official Name of the Data Set or Information Holding: Physiography of Southern Ontario

Town of Enfield, CT Geographic Information Systems

GIS CONCEPTS ARCGIS METHODS AND. 3 rd Edition, July David M. Theobald, Ph.D. Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University

MRD 207 METADATA DETAIL PAGE

Northeast U.S. Early Season Preview 2017 FISHING ACTION STARTING TO WARM UP ALREADY WITH LOTS OF FISH EXPECTED IN MAY

2015 Nigerian National Settlement Dataset (including Population Estimates)

MRD283-REV METADATA. Acronyms are Used to Identify the Data Set or Information Holding: MRD283-REV

Biogeographic Approach to Coastal Assessments & Spatial Planning

McHenry County Property Search Sources of Information

Environmental Sensitivity to Oil Spills in Gulf Shores, AL

9.0 Consistency with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA)

Opening their Shells Getting commercial clammers involved in marine spatial planning

ISO Plant Hardiness Zones Data Product Specification

Marine Spatial Planning: A Tool for Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management

Training Path FNT IT Infrastruktur Management

MRD 281. Official Name of the Data Set or Information Holding: Northeastern Ontario Rhyolite Database

Data Structures & Database Queries in GIS

GENERALIZATION IN THE NEW GENERATION OF GIS. Dan Lee ESRI, Inc. 380 New York Street Redlands, CA USA Fax:

Jacqueline M. Grebmeier Chesapeake Biological Laboratory University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD, USA

ISO Canadian Drought Monitor Data Product Specifications

GED 554 IT & GIS. Lecture 6 Exercise 5. May 10, 2013

MRD 229-Revised METADATA

Popular Mechanics, 1954

Semester Project Final Report. Logan River Flood Plain Analysis Using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS, and HEC-RAS

ArcGIS Pro: Essential Workflows STUDENT EDITION

Geospatial Tactical Decision Aids

CoB_Bounds_Full_201802

GIS CONCEPTS ARCGIS METHODS AND. 2 nd Edition, July David M. Theobald, Ph.D. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University

McHenry County Property Search Sources of Information

GEOPHYSICAL DATA SET (GDS) 1084B METADATA

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Geographic information Metadata Part 2: Extensions for imagery and gridded data

Efficiencies in Data Acquisition and Transformation

SECTION 1: Identification Information

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Geographic information Metadata Part 2: Extensions for imagery and gridded data

The Northwest Environmental Training Center presents:

Overview of Ecoregion Geographic Data at the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Subwatersheds File Geodatabase Feature Class

National Marine Sanctuary Program

Effects of Rising Sea Levels on Coral Reef and Mangrove Distributions along the Great Barrier Reef in Australia

Version 1.1 GIS Syllabus

Reprint of article that appeared in Hydro INTERNATIONAL November 2006 Volume 10 Issue 9

Display data in a map-like format so that geographic patterns and interrelationships are visible

Introduction to Geographic Information Systems (GIS): Environmental Science Focus

Novel Acoustic Techniques for Assessing Fish Schooling in the Context of an Operational Ocean Observatory

Staten Island Bus Stops, New York NY, May 2016

Getting Started with Community Maps

Data Aggregation with InfraWorks and ArcGIS for Visualization, Analysis, and Planning

OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA MANAGEMENT

UNIT 4: USING ArcGIS. Instructor: Emmanuel K. Appiah-Adjei (PhD) Department of Geological Engineering KNUST, Kumasi

The route towards a new GEBCO grid

Charlene Nielsen, MSc.

Mapping rainfall and flooding

Native species (Forbes and Graminoids) Less than 5% woody plant species. Inclusions of vernal pools. High plant diversity

These modules are covered with a brief information and practical in ArcGIS Software and open source software also like QGIS, ILWIS.

LIRR Routes, New York NY, January 2017

GIS ADMINISTRATOR / WEB DEVELOPER EVANSVILLE-VANDERBURGH COUNTY AREA PLAN COMMISSION

LIO Topographic Data Cache

Town of Taos Request for Proposal Historic Preservation GIS Geodatabase Project April 2007

DATA APPLIANCE FOR ARCGIS

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Urban Studies and Planning

Abstract. Introduction

Advanced Landcover Prediction and Habitat Assessment (ALPHA) 1.0 metadata

EDUCATION PROGRAMS GUIDE

Overview key concepts and terms (based on the textbook Chang 2006 and the practical manual)

Introduction to Coastal GIS

MUDMAP TM. Software Description

Subway Station Entrances, New York NY, May 2016

Transcription:

Sea Turtle Sightings Per Unit Effort (Fall) Northwest Atlantic United States January 2010 Prepared by: Eastern Division Conservation Science Office of The Nature Conservancy 99 Bedford Street, 5 th Floor Boston, MA 02111 Point of Contact: Jennifer Greene The Nature Conservancy jgreene@tnc.org 1. INTRODUCTION This data product was created as part of the Northwest Atlantic Marine Ecoregional Assessment. The Nature Conservancy developed this science-based ecoregional assessment for the Northwest Atlantic Marine region (Bay of Fundy to Cape Hatteras, North Carolina). This assessment synthesizes information on oceanography, chemistry, geology, biology, and social science to inform decisions about coastal and marine ecosystems. By integrating this information at a regional level, the Conservancy is able to provide both a greater understanding of the interrelated biological diversity of the marine ecoregion, and a clearer picture of the current condition of its natural areas and the challenges to their continued persistence. The ten categories of targets identified as the primary structure for the marine ecoregional assessment are: coastal and estuarine habitats, benthic habitats, diadromous fish, demersal fish, pelagic fish, forage fish, nearshore shellfish, shorebirds and seabirds, marine mammals, and sea turtles. For more information and a detailed report, please visit www.nature.ly/namera. Geospatial data obtained from the United States Navy included point shapefiles of valid sightings for all turtle targets and pre-calculated effort grids for each season. Sightings data were taken from NMFS-NEFSC Aerial Surveys, NMFS-NEFSC Shipboard Surveys, and the North Atlantic Right Whale Consortium Database. The validity of sightings was carefully screened and verified by United States Navy contractors before inclusion in the model. Invalid records were not included in the analysis. Sightings for each ten minute square were divided by the effort for each ten minute square to calculate Sightings Per Unit Effort (SPUE). SPUE was calculated for each target species, for each season, and for each ten minute square. 2. PURPOSE

Sightings Per Unit Effort (SPUE) was used to analyze areas of importance for the target sea turtle species in the Northwest Atlantic region. 3. SOURCES AND AUTHORITIES North Atlantic Right Whale Consortium (www.rightwhaleweb.org) University of Rhode Island Graduate School of Oceanography (Dr. Robert Kenney, URI/GSO) Geo-Marine Surveys, Inc. United States Navy Seasonal sightings per unit effort (SPUE) data computed from 1978-2003 survey and sighting data in the North Atlantic Right Whale Consortium (www.rightwhaleweb.org) database by the University of Rhode Island Graduate School of Oceanography and Geo-Marine Surveys, Inc. under contract to the U.S. Navy for several Navy Marine Resource Assessments. For additional information contact Dr. Robert Kenney, URI/GSO, rkenney@gso.uri.edu. Department of Navy. 2005. Marine Resource Assessment for the Northeast Operating Areas: Atlantic City, Narragansett Bay, and Boston. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic; Norfolk, Virginia. Contract Number N62470-02-D-9997, Task Order 0018. Prepared by Geo-Marine, Inc., Newport News, Virginia. 4. DATABASE DESIGN AND CONTENT Native storage format: ArcGIS File Geodatabase simple feature class Feature Types: Ten Minute Square Polygons Data Dictionary: Line Name Definition Type Size 1 OBJECTID_1 Internal feature number Object ID * 2 SHAPE Coordinates defining the features Geometry * 3 NLLCHAR Numeric Linking code Long * 4 SLLCHAR String Linking Code String 6 5 ACRES Acres of Ten Minute Square Double * 6 EFFORTF Effort Fall (October, November, December) Double * 7 T01_F Green Sea Turtle Fall Double * 8 T02_F Leatherback Fall Double * 9 T03_F Loggerhead Fall Double * 10 Shape_Length Length of feature in internal units Double * 11 Shape_Area Area of feature in internal units squared Double *

Feature Class Name: SeaTurtleSPUEfall Total Number of Unique Features: 1,161 Dataset Status: Completed 5. SPATIAL REPRESENTATION Geometry Type: vector polygon Reference System: GCS North American 1983 Horizontal Datum: North American Datum 1983 Ellipsoid: Geodetic Reference System 1980 XY Resolution: XY Scale is 1000000000.0000001 Tolerance: 8.9831528411952117e-009 Geographic extent: -76.167 to -65.667, 35.000 to 45.167 IS0 19115 Topic Category: Environment, Oceans, Biota Place Names: Place Names: Albemarle Sound, Baltimore Canyon, Bay of Fundy, Block Island Delta, Cashes Ledge, Chesapeake Bay, Cholera Bank, Delaware Bay, Georges Bank, Georges Basin, German Bank, Great South Channel, Gulf of Maine, Hudson Canyon, Hydrographer Canyon, Jeffreys Ledge, Jordan Basin, Long Island Sound, Mid-Atlantic Bight, Nantucket Shoals, Norfolk Canyon, Northeast Channel, Stellwagen Bank, Southern New England, Wilkinson Basin Recommended Cartographic Properties: (Using ArcGIS ArcMap nomenclature) Simple Fill Symbol: graduated colors, ramp: Yellow to Green to Dark Blue Range Label HSV Color Values 0 No Sightings 215-21-80 0.000001-1.000000 <1 231-91-76 1.000001-10.000000 1-10 186-100-61 10.000001-100.000000 10-100 141-53-79 100.000001-1000.000000 >100 60-25-100 Scale range for optimal visualization: 1:1,000,000 to 1:5,000,000

6. DATA PROCESSING Processing environment: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Version 6.1 (Build 7600); ESRI ArcGIS 10.0.2.3200 Process Steps Description 1 The sea turtle sightings per unit effort (SPUE) grids were calculated using two datasets provided courtesy of the U.S. Navy. These datasets include pre-calculated effort grids for each season and point shapefiles of valid sightings for sea turtles studied in The Nature Conservancy s Northwest Atlantic Ecoregional Assessment. 2 The SPUE values were calculated for each sea turtle species by season using the following equation: SPUE = 1000*(number of animals sighted)/effort 3 The results of the species by season SPUE calculations were all added to the ten minute square grid. 7. QUALITY PROCESS Attribute Accuracy: The SPUE results were compared with the point data for each species and season to check for mathematical/calculation errors. The SPUE maps were also compared with other published maps of the same data to check for accuracy. Logical consistency: Data is topologically correct and attributes fall within domain values. Completeness: The data were carefully screened and verified by Navy contractors before inclusion in the model. Invalid records were not included in analysis. Sightings were spatially and temporally oriented towards marine mammals with opportunistic recording of sea turtles. This dataset may not capture the full extent of sea turtle sightings due to the difficulty of spotting and identifying species. Ten minute squares where effort equaled zero were excluded from the dataset. Positional Accuracy: The 10 minute square grid is accurate, but the actual sightings data that the SPUE is based off of can vary in accuracy, based on year sighted and ship board positioning (GPS error). By using ten-minute squares we greatly generalize the location and aggregate the data so that differences in positional accuracy are no longer an issue. Timeliness: Based on data from 1979 to 2007. Use Constraints: The Nature Conservancy (TNC) compiled this data set from publicly available data sources and this data is freely distributable without permission from this TNC resource office. This data set must be cited on all electronic and hard copy products using the language of the Data Set Credit. Use and analysis of the geographic data are limited by the

scale at which the data was collected and mapped, and that, as a regional analysis, it is not intended for site level decisions. The Nature Conservancy shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. Any sale, distribution, loan, or offering for use of these digital data, in whole or in part, is prohibited without the approval of the Nature Conservancy. The use of these data to produce other GIS products and services with the intent to sell for a profit is prohibited without the written consent of the Nature Conservancy. All parties receiving these data must be informed of these restrictions. The Nature Conservancy shall be acknowledged as data contributors to any reports or other products derived from these data. Access Constraints: The Nature Conservancy reserves all rights in data provided. All data are provided as is. This is not a survey quality dataset. The Nature Conservancy makes no warranty as to the currency, completeness, accuracy or utility of any specific data. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data. It is strongly recommended that careful attention be paid to the contents of the metadata file associated with these data. Distribution Liability: Neither The Nature Conservancy nor any of the ecoregional planning team participants makes any warranty, expressed or implied as to the use or appropriateness of use of the enclosed data, nor are there warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use. No representation is made as to the currency, accuracy or completeness of the information in this dataset or of the data sources on which it is based. Neither The Nature Conservancy nor any of the ecoregional planning team participants shall be liable for any lost profits or consequential damages, or claims against the user by third parties.