B759: Balsam Fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) Phenology in Maine

Similar documents
Climate. Annual Temperature (Last 30 Years) January Temperature. July Temperature. Average Precipitation (Last 30 Years)

Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast October 2017 Report

IPC 24th Session, Dehradun Nov 2012

Biomes Section 2. Chapter 6: Biomes Section 2: Forest Biomes DAY ONE

Monthly overview. Rainfall

remain on the trees all year long) Example: Beaverlodge, Alberta, Canada

Nebraska experienced a wide

Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast Summer 2017

The agroclimatic resource change in Mongolia

MODELLING FROST RISK IN APPLE TREE, IRAN. Mohammad Rahimi

2011 National Seasonal Assessment Workshop for the Eastern, Southern, & Southwest Geographic Areas

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 4 Northern Cascades

CSO Climate Data Rescue Project Formal Statistics Liaison Group June 12th, 2018

2012 Growing Season Weather Summary for North Dakota. Adnan Akyüz and Barbara A. Mullins Department of Soil Science October 30, 2012

Lecture 24 Plant Ecology

Ellen L. Mecray NOAA Regional Climate Services Director, Eastern Region Taunton, MA

Recent Trends in Northern and Southern Hemispheric Cold and Warm Pockets

Weather and Climate of the Rogue Valley By Gregory V. Jones, Ph.D., Southern Oregon University

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY August 2015

Climate Change Impact on Air Temperature, Daily Temperature Range, Growing Degree Days, and Spring and Fall Frost Dates In Nebraska

Impacts of the April 2013 Mean trough over central North America

Satellites, Weather and Climate Module 40: Agriculture & forestry in a changing climate

Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis

Colorado CoCoRaHS. Colorado CoCoRaHS. Because Every Drop Counts! November 2014 Volume 2, Issue 11

GUIDED READING CHAPTER 1: THE LAY OF THE LAND (Page 1)

Weather History on the Bishop Paiute Reservation

Climate and the Atmosphere

National Wildland Significant Fire Potential Outlook

UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AMERICA WEATHER ROUNDUP Sunday, December 17, 2017

2015: A YEAR IN REVIEW F.S. ANSLOW

Prediction of Snow Water Equivalent in the Snake River Basin

Vermont Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) sites at Lye Brook and Mount Mansfield

Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast November 2017 Report

Monthly overview. Rainfall

Regional Variability in Crop Specific Synoptic Forecasts

Climate change in the U.S. Northeast

CYCLONIC AND FRONTAL ACTIVITY IN OHIO DURING THE SUMMER OF 1953

1990 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Impacts Assessment

L.O Students will learn about factors that influences the environment

PREDICTING DROUGHT VULNERABILITY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

Drought and Climate Extremes Indices for the North American Drought Monitor and North America Climate Extremes Monitoring System. Richard R. Heim Jr.

The Global Scope of Climate. The Global Scope of Climate. Keys to Climate. Chapter 8

What is the IPCC? Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Effects of Weather Conditions on the Winter Activity of Mearns Cottontail

EKOLOGI BIOMA (BIOME) TEMA 10. Program Studi Tadris Biologi Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan Institut Agama Islam Negeri Jember

Workshop on Drought and Extreme Temperatures: Preparedness and Management for Sustainable Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery

BIOMES. Definition of a Biome. Terrestrial referring to land. Climatically controlled sets of ecosystems. Characterized by distinct vegetation

How does the physical environment influence communities and ecosystems? Hoodoos in Cappadocia, Turkey

Seasonal and Spatial Patterns of Rainfall Trends on the Canadian Prairie

Illinois Drought Update, December 1, 2005 DROUGHT RESPONSE TASK FORCE Illinois State Water Survey, Department of Natural Resources

Latest Projections of Climate Change & Impacts on Planning Systems

(Dis)Assembly of the Great Lakes Forests

ACCURACY OF MODELS FOR PREDICTING PHENOLOGY OF BLACKHEADED FIREWORM AND IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVED PEST MANAGEMENT

1. Which weather map symbol is associated with extremely low air pressure? A) B) C) D) 2. The diagram below represents a weather instrument.

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 1, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

Weather and climate outlooks for crop estimates

North Carolina Climate January 2012

Using Temperature and Dew Point to Aid Forecasting Springtime Radiational Frost and/or Freezing Temperatures in the NWS La Crosse Service Area

Mountain pine beetle range expansion: The impact of phenology and survival. Kathy Bleiker and Greg Smith Canadian Forest Service

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 18, 2017 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP,

Observed Climate Variability and Change: Evidence and Issues Related to Uncertainty

How Do the Great Lakes Affect Temperature?

January 25, Summary

Foundations of Earth Science, 6e Lutgens, Tarbuck, & Tasa

THE CANADIAN CENTRE FOR CLIMATE MODELLING AND ANALYSIS

The following information is provided for your use in describing climate and water supply conditions in the West as of April 1, 2003.

UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AMERICA OUTLOOK (FULL REPORT) Thursday, December 28, 2017

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: February 15, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

16 Global Climate. Learning Goals. Summary. After studying this chapter, students should be able to:

Estimation of Wave Heights during Extreme Events in Lake St. Clair

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System April 18, 2017

MDA WEATHER SERVICES AG WEATHER OUTLOOK. Kyle Tapley-Senior Agricultural Meteorologist May 22, 2014 Chicago, IL

A Review of Winter Chilling Requirements in Pecan. Eric T. Stafne Associate Extension and Research Professor Mississippi State University

Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast Winter

Definitions Weather and Climate Climates of NYS Weather Climate 2012 Characteristics of Climate Regions of NYS NYS s Climates 1.

Minnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture. Today. 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date

Research Note COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR ESTIMATING CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN PUERTO RICO 1,2. J. Agric. Univ. P.R. 89(1-2): (2005)

Climates of NYS. Definitions. Climate Regions of NYS. Storm Tracks. Climate Controls 10/13/2011. Characteristics of NYS s Climates

Attribution of Estonian phyto-, ornitho- and ichtyophenological trends with parameters of changing climate

Mozambique. General Climate. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G. Lizcano 1

Chapter outline. Reference 12/13/2016

CLIMATE. UNIT TWO March 2019

The Pennsylvania Observer

2012 Rainfall, Runoff, Water Level & Temperature Beebe Lake Wright County, MN (# )

Weather Conditions during the 1992 Growing Season

CLIMATE OF THE ZUMWALT PRAIRIE OF NORTHEASTERN OREGON FROM 1930 TO PRESENT

TUNDRA. Column 1 biome name Column 2 biome description Column 3 examples of plant adaptations

By: J Malherbe, R Kuschke

2012 Growing Season. Niagara Report. Wayne Heinen

8.1 CHANGES IN CHARACTERISTICS OF UNITED STATES SNOWFALL OVER THE LAST HALF OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY

Ocean in Motion 7: El Nino and Hurricanes!

Current Climate Trends and Implications

The New Normal or Was It?

Table 1. August average temperatures and departures from normal ( F) for selected cities.

The Atmosphere. Importance of our. 4 Layers of the Atmosphere. Introduction to atmosphere, weather, and climate. What makes up the atmosphere?

Climate Change or Climate Variability?

NWS FORM E-5 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE I HYDRO SERVICE AREA NOAA, NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE I Indianapolis, IN MONTHLY REPORT

Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast December 2017 Report

Chapter-1 Introduction

UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AMERICA SNAPSHOT REPORT Thursday, December 21, 2017

Transcription:

The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 5-1979 B759: Balsam Fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) Phenology in Maine T. M. Mingo J. B. Dimond Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_bulletin Part of the Forest Biology Commons Recommended Citation Mingo, T.M., and J.B. Dimond. 1979. Balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) phenology in Maine. Life Sciences and Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 759. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact um.library.technical.services@maine.edu.

BALSAM FIR (ABIES BALSAMEA (L.) MILL.) PHENOLOGY IN MAINE T. M. Mingo and J. B. Dimond LIFE SCIENCES AND AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF MAINE AT ORONO BULLETIN 759 MAY 1979,

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to express their thanks and sincere appreciation to Richard Dearborn (Maine Forest Service) and J eanelle Tripp, respectivelv, for monitoring the Augusta and Waite reference stations. Henry Trial, Jr. (Maine Forest Service) provided data on peak occurrences of budworm larvae. Ms. Jolene Walker typed the manuscript. Funding for this study was provided by a grant from the Maine Forest Service.

ABSTRACT Spring phenology of balsam fir in Maine was investigated during 1978. Multiple regression models based on climatic and geographic factors were developed for predicting fir phenology and accounted for a maximum of 52.6% of the observed phenological variation. Generalized maps depicting observed and expected phenology patterns are also presented. Balsam Fir (Abies bolsomeo (L.) Mill.) Phenology in Maine T. M. Mingo and J. B. Dimond l The most abundant conifer in Maine, balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.), occurs commonly in all areas of the state except the southern-most extremes. It is used extensively in the pulp and paper industry and is of major economic importance. It is also the principal host of the spruce budworm (Choristoneura jumijerana (Clem.) ). Budworm populations have been at outbreak levels throughout much of the state since 1971, and in restricted portions of the state prior to 1971. Attempts to reduce budworm populations and to prevent tree mortality have required aerial application of insecticides over millions of acres of forest land on an annual basis. Critical to these programs has been the proper timing of sampling periods and spray application. The present study was conducted during 1978 to examine phenological trends in the spring development of balsam fir in Maine. Additional objectives included the development of multiple regression models for predicting fir phenology throughout the state, the construction of general phenology maps depicting observed and expected phenology, and the association of phenological events of balsam fir with those of the spruce budworm. METHODS AND MATERIALS Phenological procedures used during this study are described in detail by Morris, Webb, and Bennett (1956). The method has two major advantages when compared to traditional phenology techniques 1 Assistant Technologist and Professor of Entomology, respectively.

2 LSA Experiment Station Bulletin 759 which require an observer to evaluate subjectively phenological events such as full-bloom or end-of-bloom of selected flowers. The method used in this study is quantitative and enables different observers to produce comparable data. The method also allows a small number of observers to cover large geographic areas. Details of the procedure are given below. Reference stations were located near Augusta, Orono, and Waite, Maine. These served as control sites and were used to determine current shoot growth curves for trees within these areas of the state. The Augusta and Waite stations consisted of a plot of 15 trees, approximately 10-12 feet in height, that were located in exposed areas. The reference station located at Orono contained two plots. One plot was located under a dense canopy of white pine (Pinus strobus L.) and the second was located in an exposed open area. Both plots contained 20 trees. To determine growth rates, a single branch near the top of each tree was selected and marked with a numbered tag. The terminal shoot of each tagged branch was then periodically measured. Measurements were initiated prior to any bud development and were continued until cessation of all growth. Measurements, from the base of the dormant bud to its apex, were taken to the nearest millimeter using a plastic ruler. Following initiation of growth, the bud scales drop leaving a welldefined scar at the base of the developing shoot. This scar forms an excellent reference point and was used during later measurements. Measurements were taken at weekly intervals at the Augusta and Waite reference stations and at biweekly intervals at the Orono reference station. After the completion of all growth, the length of the dormant bud was subtracted from the total length of its respective shoot. The resulting measurements represented the actual shoot lengths for each date of measurement. These were then converted to percent of final growth and plotted against time to produce growth curves for each reference station. The growth curves were subsequently used to determine phenological variation at numerous survey stations distributed throughout the state. A total of 87 survey stations was established throughout the range of balsam fir in Maine. Survey stations were located at approximately 20 mile intervals and included all areas of the state except the southwest corner. Each survey station contained 15-20 trees which were located in exposed areas. A single branch on each tree was selected and marked with a numbered tag for subsequent measurements. Shoot measurements at each survey station were taken only twice during this

LSA Experiment Station Bulletin 759 3 study. The first measurements were taken during early spring when shoots were approximately 20-35 % elongated. (Timing for this measurement can be estimated from internode lengths of growth from previous years.) The final shoot measurements were taken in late summer following the completion of all growth and were necessary to calculate the precise percent growth of each shoot when the initial measurements were made. Phenological variation occurring at each survey station was determined by comparing the survey station data to the growth curves derived from the reference stations. To illustrate this procedure, a particular survey station was first measured on June 5th and again during late summer. It was found that at the time the initial measurements were taken (June 5th) the shoots were 30% elongated. Examination of the growth curve indicated that trees at the Orono reference station had reached the same level of growth (30% elongation) four days earlier on June 1st. Therefore, the survey station was phenologically four days behind the Orono reference station. Phenology values for each survey station were determined using this procedure. The phenology values from the survey stations were plotted on state maps, and isophenes (lines separating zones of equal phenology) were drawn by hand. To facilitate map construction, phenology values were grouped into increments of from 1-6 days before plotting. Multiple regression analysis was used to develop models for predicting balsam fir phenology throughout the state. Factors which were considered included: longitude, latitude, altitude, cumulative annual rainfall, degree days, temperature, and monthly rainfall. Values for longitude, altitude, and latitude were obtained from topographic maps. Weather data for 53 weather stations used for comparison with the phenological data obtained during this study were taken from monthly National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration weather summaries. In order to develop multiple regression models, phenology data from the survey stations were compared with the geographic and climatic parameters listed above. Each survey station was compared with data obtained from the nearest weather station. Comparisons were made for May and June weather data only. The actual regression analysis involved two methods of calculation: backward elimination and stepwise regression. Both methods are described in detail by Draper and Smith (1966) and were used to determine the regression model containing the smallest number of significant variables. All calculations were made on the University of Maine IBM computer using Statistical Procedures for the Social Sciences programs.

4 LSA Experiment Station Bulletin 759 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Both methods of regression calculation produced identical models which are summarized in Table I. The regression model containing all variables was found to be statistically significant and accounted for a maximum of 53.7% of the observed phenological variation. However, only three factors (altitude, latitude, and May degree days) were found to have a major effect on phenology. The regression model containing these three factors accounted for 52.6% of the observed variation, a reduction of only 1.1 % following the removal of the non-significant variables from the model. Degree day data made a significant contribution to phenology, as measured from fir shoots, only during May. During all other periods, altitude and latitude were the only factors that significantly affected phenology. The regression model based on these two variables accounted for 50.3 % of the total variation. The remaining unexplained variation is probably the result of site and stand factors such as soil quality, stand vigor, genetic variation, snow cover, and frost depth. Reference station growth curves (Figure 1) displayed typically sigmoid patterns of growth and clearly reflected the progression of phenology across the state. Reference stations were phenologically separated from each other by approximately 5-7 days. During late May and early June drought conditions developed throughout the state and resulted in decreased rates of growth. This reduction of growth was reflected in the growth curves by a change in slope and was most evident at the Augusta reference station and to a lesser extent at the Orono and Waite reference stations. Growth curves for the control plots located at Orono (Figure 2) displayed essentially identical rates of growth during the early spring periods. During late May and early June, trees growing in the open became heavily infested with the balsam twig aphid, Mindarus abietinus Koch. The infestation resulted in arrested growth, retardation of the growth curve and in some cases shoot mortality. Sheltered trees, by contrast, were free from aphid populations. The cleflrest representation of phenology from the survey stations during spring 1978 (Figure 3) was produced using a 3-day interval. (The 3-day interval included all values from 1.5 to 4.5 days.) The map presented in Figure 3 should be considered to be an approximate representation of phenology in Maine. The placement of hand-drawn isophenes depends upon the subjective evaluation of the observer and becomes particularly difficult for areas having few data points or rapid topographic changes (Hopp and Blair 1973). However, within these restrictions, general trends of phenology can be depicted.

Table 1. Regression models for predicting balsam fir phenology in Maine.! Phenology = 8.6592 Phenology 4.4122-0.004 (altitude) -0.005 (altitude) Regression Models -0.014 (latitude) -0.016 (May degree -0.019 (latitude) 1 Latitude values coded as follows: 43 00' = 0, 44 00' = 60,45 0<Y = 120... ; degree d negative departures of average daily temperatures from 65 F; R square equals the amou countea for by the regression model and the standard error equals the square root of t 2 Value indicates Y intercept when X equals zero.

6 LSA Experiment Station Bulletin 759 100 90 80 70 60 50.c +' 3: 0 '" '" +' c (.J " Q) '" "" 40 30 20 10 o 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 May June J uly Aug Figure I. Growth curves for reference stations located at Augusta, Waite, and Orono, Maine. An oceanic influence is particularly evident along the southeastern coastal areas of the state and is expressed as a delay of phenology in those areas. This effect is probably the result of consistently cooler coastal temperatures during the spring and summer periods.

LSA Experiment Station Bulletin 759 7 100 90 80 70 Sheltered trees..,_-- Open grown t rees 60 ~-- Combined growth curve 50..c: +' ~ 0 4 0.. c.:> +' C.. " 0.. " 30 20 10 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 May J une July Aug Figure 2. Growth curves for control groups located at the Orono reference station. The area of latest phenology occupies the general region of the state north of Greenville and west of Ashland. The delay of phenology in this area is probably the result of higher latitudes, higher average altitudes, and possibly from differing forest types (coniferous forests as opposed to hardwood or mixed forest types).

8 LSA Experiment Station Bulletin 759 N Figure 3. Observed phenology of balsam fir in Maine during Spring 1978. Isophenes separate zones of equal phenology using a three-day interval based on the Orono reference station. The effect of agricultural activities may also be reflected in the phenology map. The zero and -3 day phenology zones display a marked northward extension into an area of the state that is used extensively

LSA Experiment Station Bulletin 759 9 for the commercial production of potatoes. Since this area contains many cleared fields, the northern extension of these two intervals may reflect higher rates of warming due to increased exposure of the land surface. Both field workers and spruce budworm researchers (H. Trial, Jr. personal communication) generally believe that 1978 was an atypical year in Maine. Very rapid warming occurred in the northern and eastern areas of the state. As a result the Oxbow and Waite areas, which are normally expected to be behind the Orono area in spring phenology, were either in the same or in an earlier phenology zone. Consequently the map depicting observed phenology (Figure 3) may not represent the typical phenological patterns that would be expected to occur in Maine. In order to refine the phenology map presented in Figure 3, the regression model presented in Table I was used to calculate expected phenology. Values for altitude, latitude, and May degree days in 1978 were inserted into the regression formula and the expected phenology value for each survey station was calculated. These values were plotted on a map using a 3-day interval and isophenes were then drawn by hand. The map of expected phenology is presented in Figure 4. The amount of snow cover and the depth of frost penetration influences soil warming and is of considerable importance in the initiation of spring growth. Hickin and Vittum (1976) have in fact shown that soil temperature as well as air temperature, above a certain threshold, are significant factors in predicting spring phenology. As a result it is probable that snow cover and frost penetration are among the more important unmeasured variables, leading to an r2 value of only 52 % in the regression equation. The importance of snow cover and frost depth may be reflected in differences between Figures 3 and 4. Greater amounts of snow cover as well as greater depths of frost in the northwestern areas of Maine probably led to greater phenological delays in those areas (Figure 3) than were predicted using the regression model based on altitude, latitude, and May degree days (Figure 4). In addition to snow and frost, the unexplained variation is probably the result of unmeasured site and stand variables such as stand vigor, soil quality, and genetic variation. The most accurate map depicting typical phenology in Maine would probably contain elements of both Figures 3 and 4. However, this can only be verified by continuing the present type of study for

10 LSA Experiment Station Bulletin 759 Figure 4. Balsam fir phenology in Maine during Spring 1978 predicted by the regression model based on altitude, latitude, and May 'degree day variables. Isophenes separate zones of equal phenology using a threeday interval. several years. The establishment of four or five reference stations widely distributed across the state would probably be adequate for the purpose and would probably require little expense.

LSA Experiment Station Bulletin 759 11 Morris, Webb, and Bennett (1956) have shown that balsam fir growth curves can vary from year to year depending upon the onset of spring conditions and the rate of warming. The arrival of spring can be predicted in part by examination of degree day data, however, the rate of warming cannot, and may change rapidly with latitudinal shifts of the storm track (Greenbank 1956). Morris, Webb, and Bennett (1956) also observed that differences in phenology between two New Brunswick sites varied from 10-18 days during six different years. Variation was usually in the range of 10-13 days and did not change by more than one day from one year to the next with the exception of a single unusually cold year. The annual phenological variation occurring in Maine has yet to be reported but can be estimated by using past weather data (NOAA weather summaries) and the regression model presented in Table I. By inserting the appropriate values for altitude, latitude, and May degree days into the regression formula, the phenology value for any survey station during any year can be calculated. A comparison of widely separated survey stations will reveal the amount of variation occurring across the state during any particular year. Similarly, the comparison of data of individual survey stations will reveal the amount of change from anyone year to the next at that particular location. Phenology values for selected sites throughout the state were calculated for the period from 1971 through 1978. The' resulting values were compared to the Orono reference station to determine the magnitude of phenological difference across the state and the extent of variation from one year to the next. To illustrate this procedure, the comparison between the Clayton Lake survey station and the Orono reference station is summarized in Table II. Phenological differences between these two sites ranged from 6.2 to 8.4 days. The greatest change in phenology from anyone year to the next between these two sites occurred during 1972-1973 and was 1.3 days. However, the average change in phenology from one year to the next was only 0.8 days. The greatest difference in phenology during the entire eight year period was only 2.2 days. The greatest annual change in phenology between the Orono reference station and any other survey station did not exceed 2.2 days while the largest total variation during the same period did not exceed 2.7 days. As a result phenological variation in Maine can be expected to remain relatively constant, based on May degree days, except during abnormal years. However, it should be noted that differences in unmeasured variables such,as snow cover and frost depth between areas may act to increase the variation in excess of that explained by the regression model alone.

12 LSA Experiment Station Bulletin 759 Table II. Comparison between the Clayton Lake survey station and the Orono reference station. Clayton Lake Orono Phenological Annual Year Degree Daysl Phenology2 Degree D ays Phenology Difference Change (days) (days) (days) (days) ----_. 1971 448-5.547 306 1.707 7.254 1.200 1972 497-6.33 1 280 2.123 8.454 1.328 1973 546-7.115 412 0.011 7.126 0.960 1974 652-8.811 458-0.725 8.086 0.768 1975 370-4.299 224 3.019 7.318 0.550 1976 446-5.509 334 1.259 6.768 0.214 1977 412-4.971 287 2.011 6.982 0.720 1978 364-4.203 284 2.059 6.262 1 Degree day values equal the sums of the negative departures of average daily temperature from 65'F. 2 Phenology values are based on the regression mod.:1 containing latitude, altitude, and May degree day values. Due to the economic importance of both the spruce budworm and balsam fir, attempts were made to associate phenological events of these two species. Dates of peak occurrence of budworm larvae (third and fourth instars) in the Oxbow area of northern Maine (data from H. Trial, Jr.) were compared with degree day data for the period from 1971 through 1978. The date of peak occurrence of third instar larvae was found to be highly correlated (r = 0.8 5, P < 0.02) with May degree day values. The specific correlation formula was: date of peak occurrence = 390.8 + 18.0 (May degree days) where May 23rd, the earliest date of occurrence, was coded to equal day number one. The correlation between peak occurrence of fourth instar larvae and May degree day values was not significant (r = 0.52, P < 0.20 > 0.10). The average dates of peak occurrence of third and fourth instar larvae in the Oxbow area were May 28th and June 2nd respectively. Phenological values for the Oxbow area (1971-1978) were calculated using weather data and the regression model as previously described and compared to the Orono reference station to determine the amount of phenological difference between these two areas. The Orono reference station was found to be 6.3 ± 0.8 days phenologically

LSA Experiment Station Bulletin 759 13 ahead of the Oxbow area. The occurrence of budworm larvae would also be expected to be 6.3 ± 0.8 days earlier at the Orono reference station than in the Oxbow area. The corresponding dates of peak occurrence of third and fourth ins tar larvae in the Orono area would therefore be approximately May 22nd and May 27th respectively. Since such differences are known or can be determined, the phenology maps can be calibrated to reflect dates of peak occurrence of budworm larvae rather than zones of equal phenology. By using the regression models and phenology maps presented in this study, the proper timing of sampling periods as well as the initiation of spray programs should be facilitated. Similarly, the data presented here should enable an observer to predict the occurrence of phenological events throughout the state. LITERATURE CITED Draper, N.R. and H. Smith. 1966. Applied regression analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 407 p. Greenbank, D.O. 1956. The role of climate and dispersal in the initiation of outbreaks of the spmce budworm in New Brunswick. I. The role of climate. Can. J. Zool. 34: 453-476. Hickin, RP. and M.T. Vittum. 1976. The importance of soil and air temperature in spring phenoclimatic modehing. Int. J. Biometeor. 20(3): 200-206. Hopp, R.I. and B.O. Blair. 1973. Plant phenology in eastern and central North America. I. Development of networks and preliminary results. University of Vermont, Vt. Ag. Exp. Sta. Bull. 677. Morris, RF., Webb, F.E., and C.W. Bennett. 1956. A method of phenological survey for use in forest insect studies. Can. J. Zool. 34: 533-540.