Electrodynamic Tether at Jupiter 1. Capture operation and constraints

Similar documents
ELECTRODYNAMIC TETHER MICROSATS AT THE GIANT PLANETS

Propellantless deorbiting of space debris by bare electrodynamic tethers

Overview of the Jovian Exploration Technology Reference Studies

JOVIAN ORBIT CAPTURE AND ECCENTRICITY REDUCTION USING ELECTRODYNAMIC TETHER PROPULSION

Orbital energy of natural satellites converted into permanent power for spacecraft

ON THE THRUST CAPABILITY OF ELECTRODYNAMIC TETHERS WORKING IN GENERATOR MODE

Electrodynamic Tether at Jupiter I: Capture Operation and Constraints

JUpiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE) Status report for OPAG. N. Altobelli (on behalf of O. Witasse) JUICE artist impression (Credits ESA, AOES)

Europa Exploration: Challenges and Solutions

Acta Futura - Issue 2

Understanding Motion, Energy & Gravity

Understanding Motion, Energy & Gravity

Last Class. Jupiter. Today s Class

Design of a Multi-Moon Orbiter

Last Class. Today s Class 11/28/2017

Outline. Characteristics of Jupiter. Exploration of Jupiter. Data and Images from JUNO spacecraft

Planetary magnetospheres

Satellite Components & Systems. Dr. Ugur GUVEN Aerospace Engineer (P.hD) Nuclear Science & Technology Engineer (M.Sc)

Phys 214. Planets and Life

Today. Laws of Motion. Conservation Laws. Gravity. tides

An introduction to the plasma state in nature and in space

Moons of Sol Lecture 13 3/5/2018

Spacecraft Environment Interaction Engineering

Dynamics and Stability of Tethered Satellites at Lagrangian Points

Adios Cassini! Crashed into Saturn 9/15/17 after 20 years in space.

JUICE: A European Mission to Jupiter and its Icy Moons. Claire Vallat Prague, 15 th November 2018

Design of low energy space missions using dynamical systems theory

Science Scenario Modeling

Dynamical properties of the Solar System. Second Kepler s Law. Dynamics of planetary orbits. ν: true anomaly

Juno. Fran Bagenal University of Colorado

Jupiter. Jupiter is the third-brightest object in the night sky (after the Moon and Venus). Exploration by Spacecrafts

David versus Goliath 1

Chapter 7 Our Planetary System

Overview of Solar System

Lecture 23: Jupiter. Solar System. Jupiter s Orbit. The semi-major axis of Jupiter s orbit is a = 5.2 AU

ESA s Juice: Mission Summary and Fact Sheet

Jupiter and its Moons

The Jovian Planets. Why do we expect planets like this in the outer reaches of the solar system?(lc)

BravoSat: Optimizing the Delta-V Capability of a CubeSat Mission. with Novel Plasma Propulsion Technology ISSC 2013

Lesson 7. Luis Anchordoqui. Physics 168. Tuesday, October 10, 17

Trajectories to the Moons (incl. a trajectory for an Enceladus orbiter)

Juno Update for OPAG. Steve Levin Juno Project Scien8st September 7, 2017

Solar System. The Jovian Satellites. Regular vs. Irregular Satellites. Jovian satellites reside beyond the frost line

ELECTRODYNAMIC TETHERS FOR SPACECRAFT PROPULSION

Equation of orbital velocity: v 2 =GM(2/r 1/a) where: G is the gravitational constant (G=6.67x10 11 N/m 3 kg), M is the mass of the sun (or central

ESA s Cosmic Vision Programme: Outer Planet Mission Studies

Circular Motion and Gravitation Auxilliary Items

INTERSTELLAR PRECURSOR MISSIONS USING ADVANCED DUAL-STAGE ION PROPULSION SYSTEMS

Jovian Meteoroid Environment Model JMEM: Dust from the Galilean Satellites

Outer Solar System. Jupiter. PHY outer-solar-system - J. Hedberg

9.2 Worksheet #3 - Circular and Satellite Motion

SHORT, HIGH CURRENT ELECTRODYNAMIC TETHER. N.A.Savich Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia

Chapter 11 Jovian Planet Systems. Comparing the Jovian Planets. Jovian Planet Composition 4/10/16. Spacecraft Missions

Technology Reference Studies

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

Exploring The Planets: Jupiter

On the formation of the Martian moons from a circum-mars accretion disk

12. Jovian Planet Systems Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Addison Wesley

The Solar System. Tour of the Solar System

Introduction to the Solar System

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

ESA Robotic Science Missions Overview

Solar System. The Jovian Satellites. Regular vs. Irregular Satellites. Jovian satellites reside beyond the frost line

S E C T I O N 8 T H E T O U R

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF SPACE TETHER MISSIONS

Jovian (Jupiter like) Planets

Ulrich Walter. Astronautics. The Physics of Space Flight. 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition

System Analysis of the Expected Electrodynamic Tether Performance for the ProSEDS Mission

Chapter 11 Jovian Planet Systems. Jovian Planet Composition. Are jovian planets all alike? Density Differences. Density Differences

Welcome to the Solar System

9/22/ A Brief Tour of the Solar System. Chapter 6: Formation of the Solar System. What does the solar system look like?

Design of Low Energy Space Missions using Dynamical Systems Theory

4.1 Describing Motion. How do we describe motion? Chapter 4 Making Sense of the Universe: Understanding Motion, Energy, and Gravity

Scott Bolton OPAG February 1, 2016

Newton s Laws and the Nature of Matter

Chapter 11 Jovian Planet Systems

Astronomy 1140 Quiz 4 Review

Probing planetary interiors by spacecraft orbital observations

Lesson 2. NON OPTICAL ASTRONOMY: GRAVITATION SCIENTIFIC CASE: Gravitation. Spokesperson:

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 11. Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Launch Period Development for the Juno Mission to Jupiter

Chapter 11 Jovian Planet Systems. Jovian Planet Composition. Are jovian planets all alike? Density Differences. Density Differences

19 October 2012! Moons of Jupiter! So many moons, so little

Electrodynamic Tethers as Propulsion Systems: System Considerations and Future Plans

Chapter 11 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition. Jovian Planet Systems Pearson Education, Inc.

In the previous lecture, we discussed the basics of circular orbits. Mastering even circular orbits

NASA Future Magnetospheric Missions. J. Slavin & T. Moore Laboratory for Solar & Space Physics NASA GSFC

Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter

JUXTA : A New Probe of X-ray Emission from Jupiter and the Solar System

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

A Comparison of Low Cost Transfer Orbits from GEO to LLO for a Lunar CubeSat Mission

A = 6561 times greater. B. 81 times greater. C. equally strong. D. 1/81 as great. E. (1/81) 2 = 1/6561 as great Pearson Education, Inc.

Jovian Meteoroid Environment Model JMEM

Jupiter & Saturn. Moons of the Planets. Jupiter s Galilean satellites are easily seen with Earth-based telescopes. The Moons

ORBITS WRITTEN Q.E. (June 2012) Each of the five problems is valued at 20 points. (Total for exam: 100 points)

Astronomy 1001/1005 Midterm (200 points) Name:

JUICE/Laplace Mission Summary & Status

Astrobiology in the outer Solar System

Powered Space Flight

Jovian Planet Systems

Transcription:

Electrodynamic Tether at Jupiter 1. Capture operation and constraints Juan R. Sanmartin and M. Charro, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid E. Lorenzini, University of Padova, H. Garrett, Jet Propulsion Laboratory / NASA C. Bramanti and C. Bombardelli, European Space Agency / ESTEC European Geosciences Union / General Assembly 2007 1

Galileo: A successful but handcuffed mission * High wet-mass for chemical propellant reduced orbital manoeuvring after capture kept scientific payload to a few percent in mass Jointly with launcher limitations led to protracted trip, required GAs * RTGs was weak power source // Flybys took long times * Further exploration of Jupiter / moons faces issues on power, propulsion, trip times, radiation 2

NASA's approaches to the challenge: * Europan Orbiter: Kept RTG s, chemical propulsion. But no-gas (direct) trip + moon- GAs for orbiting Europa * JIMO / Prometheus 1: Chemical propulsion, RTG s, GAs off Nuclear reactor for power, and for powering electrical-thrusters EO cancelled in Phase B / JIMO deferred indefinitely * JUNO (Polar Orbiter): Back to (5-year) trip, chemical propulsion But, RTG s dropped, solar cell arrays used for power 3

Further NASA planning: * JPL Studies (Europa Geophysical Explorer, Europa Explorer) + OPAG planning: GAs for both indirect trip and moon-mediated capture by Europa, 3-month stay (3 Mrad Si radiation dose) * Other moons: Jovicentric Orbiter for 50 Io flybys ( < 2 Mrad Si ) * Ganymede Exploration Orbiter + E3 Orbiter with Probes GEO: 5-year Europa observer + relay for E3OP (1month at Europa) 4

ESA's approach to challenge: * Jovian Minisat Explorer: Indirect trip, solar-cell power chemical propulsion (+ SEP backup), * Develop LILT - GaAs cells with solar concentrators If solar program failed problematic reversion to RTG's * S/C split Jovian Europan Orbiter + Jovian Relay Satellite GAs to get JEO to Europa, JRS to Jovian 3:1 resonance orbit JRS serves as relay for JEO (like GEO for E3OP) 5

New approach: Tapping Jupiter s rotational energy * No RTGs, no solar power, no NEP Spare use of GAs, chemical propulsion * Positions of perijove, apojove in elliptical orbits relative to equatorial stationary orbit of radius a s ( p / 2 p ) 1/3 make Lorentz force induced on ED-tether be drag / thrust always reduce mechanical energy, generate power a s - orbit has maximum of mechanical energy in Spin/Orbit interaction 6

* Small Satellite (Planet spin, Orbital motion contribute to energy ( p, a), angular momentum H( p, a) = H 0 (a) can present 2 rigid-body motion ( orb = p ) extrema * Rigid-body motion at a( min ) (farther from planet) is stable Rigid-body motion at a( max ) is unstable Any dissipation would move satellites away from a( max ) * For artificial satellites, a[ max )] = a s 7

Power, Drag / Thrust at ED-Tethers E ( tether frame) E ( plasma frame) v orb v pl B E m Outside tether: E ( tether frame) E m Inside tether: E ( tether frame ) I / c A cs * Lorentz force: L I B ( I E m 0) ( LI B) ( v orb v pl ) LI Em < 0 Thrust if v opposite v orb v pl ( a > a s, eastward Earth orbits) orb 8

9

* An ideal free-lunch tour of the Jovian System: ED-tether is kinetic mechanism to reduce spin/orbit energy But performance heavily dependent of ambient conditions 10

* Thrust requires corotating dense plasma beyond a s For Jupiter, a s /R p ( p / 2 p ) 1/3 is 1/3 the Earth value Magnetic field B at surface is 10 times greater Jovian plasmasphere reaches, corotates, beyond a s * Moon Io at 1:2 resonance with Europa, 10 times closer to Jupiter than Moon to Earth Extreme tectonics / volcanism 1 Ton/s (O, S) eject Fast corotating plasma-torus from plasmasphere to Europa Drag / Thrust only applied in plasmasphere / torus 11

12

e - e - s I e - A B C e - e - e - Sketch of bare-tether operation. Bias negative to the right of B. Electrons collected on anodic segment AB. Ion collection on cathodic segment BC negligible. Electrons ejected at hollow cathode C. Hollow cathode at end A off. 13

* Thin bare tape ( L >> width w >> thickness h) lighter than round wire collects electrons as giant probe/oml regime OML conditions limit w but anodic segment is 10 s km long * Two bounds on length-averaged current Iav 2 5 2wL ene 2eE m L m e (no ohmic-effects) Iav (ohmic-effects limit) c E m wh * Little expellant consumed in ejecting electrons at Hollow Cathode 14

* Hohmann-like transfer from Earth barely hyperbolic v 2r r p a E a S 2 p M 2 e h 1 1 0. 018 J J M J a E a J Make post-capture orbit barely elliptic Use parabolic orbit to calculate capture 1 1 ( e h 1) r p R J e, 1 * Assume tether has steady spin (opposite Jupiter spin) * Use no-tilt, no offset dipole magnetic field Gravity-gradient torque averages out 15

u u t r u r u n r B N r p Jupiter corotating plasma Capture under geometry of equatorial parabolic orbit 16

B A u u E u t I u r C N r p Unit vectors for motional electric field and spinning tether. A, C are anodic, cathodic ends. Calculations are -averages 17

Drag work required for S/C capture: Incoming-orbit energy ½ M S/C v 2 - ½ M S/C v 2 < 0 (1 + ) ½ M S/C v 2 = - W C LI av B r p * If no ohmic effects ( E E u m ) m 2W C M SC r p B E L3 / 2 L3 / 2 (1 ) Ne m m m v 2 t v 2 t h h t * If ohmic-dominated 2 W C m v 2 t (1 ) M SC m t c B E m r p v 2 t 18

Dashed lines: No-ohmic / Ohmic-dominated, bounds on mass-ratio Solid line: Actual dependence on (L / 50 km) (f N 0.05 mm/ h) 2/3 Low is case of interest 19

2 W C m t v 2 (1 ) M SC m t c B 2 s a s v s 2 5/6 t v 2 r p S, R J 2.11 S, r p / R J For Al / Hohmann transfer ohmic-dominated, Low L / h 2/3 weak ohmic-effects * Performance independent of tape width w. S/C mass scales up with w Performance depends on plasma density but S (, 1) = 178 Saturn case (B s 2 smaller by factor 1/400) needs reduced v 20

35 32,5 30 27,5 = 1 Ohmic-Effects Limit L=160km h=0.05mm f N =2 5 L=100km h=0.05mm f N =1 =2 L=50km h=0.05mm f N =1 =1 L=80km h=0.10mm f N =1/2 0.63 25 22,5 20 MSC / mt 17,5 15 12,5 10 7,5 5 2,5 0 1 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 2 r p / R J 21

Powerful capture (long, thin tape, low perijove)? * High Lorentz forces, low gravity-gradient forces ( 2 orb = p /a 3 p R 3 p / a 3 for vertical of circular orbit) Tether spin (opposite Jupiter s) required to keep bowing low Maximum bowing L / t 2 h (greater at lower perijove) * Tensile stress t 2 L 2 (for given mass ratio) too high bowing or too high stress Bowing L 5/2 / h (for given maximum stress) 22

Powerful capture too hot tether at perijove? * Temperature T t in local equilibrium (too weak diffusivity) quasisteady equilibrium (too slow tether rotation) between local / instantaneous radiation loss and heating power * Local heating power due to impact of electrons dominant at low T t max L 3/8 / t 1/4 at anodic end when E m along tether Relative rise-time h / L 9/8 t 1/4 (smaller at lower perijove) High emissivity, t 0.8 required 23

Conclusions * Al tape with L = 80 km, h = 0.05mm could capture at r p = 1.5 R J a (full) S/C mass up to 5 m t ( m t = 216 kg for w = 2 cm) 20 minutes spin, and coating to get t 0.8, satisfy all constraints Reducing v below the Hohmann value easies capture. * Cross section need not be all conductive (weak ohmic effects) Al /fiber sandwich to reduce t, prevent tearing, increase tensile strength * A few MWh extracted at capture power to use, power to store. 24