arxiv:math/ v1 [math.rt] 17 Jul 2006

ON THE STRUCTURE OF CALABI-YAU CATEGORIES WITH A CLUSTER TILTING SUBCATEGORY arxv:math/0607394v1 [math.rt] 17 Jul 2006 GONÇALO TABUADA Abstract. We prove that for d 2, a algebrac d-calab-yau tragulated category edowed wth a d-cluster tltg subcategory s the stable category of a DG category whch s perfectly (d + 1)-Calab-Yau ad carres a o degeerate t-structure whose heart has eough projectves. Cotets 1. Itroducto 1 2. Ackowledgmets 2 3. Prelmares 2 4. Embeddg 3 5. Determato of the mage of G 6 6. Alteratve descrpto 10 7. The ma theorem 12 Appedx A. Exteso of t-structures 14 Refereces 17 1. Itroducto I ths artcle, we propose a descrpto of a class of Calab-Yau categores usg the formalsm of DG-categores ad the oto of stablzato, as used for the descrpto of tragulated orbt categores secto 7 of [16]. For d 2, let C be a algebrac d-calab-yau tragulated category edowed wth a d-cluster tltg subcategory T, cf. [18] [13] [14]. Such categores occur for example, - the represetato-theoretc approach to Fom-Zelevsky s cluster algebras [9], cf. [5] [6] [10] ad the refereces gve there, - the study of Cohe-Macaulay modules over certa solated sgulartes, cf. [12] [18] [11], ad the study of o commutatve crepat resolutos [28], cf. [12]. From C ad T we costruct a exact dg category B, whch s perfectly (d + 1)- Calab-Yau, ad ao-degeerateasleu, cf. [20], H 0 (B) whoseheart haseough projectves. We prove, theorem 7.1, how to recover the category C from B ad U usg a geeral procedure of stablzato defed secto 7. Ths exteds prevous results of [19] to a more geeral framework. It follows from [24] that for d = 2, up Key words ad phrases. Tragulated category, Calab-Yau property, t-structure, DG-category, Brow represetablty theorem. Supported by FCT-Portugal, scholarshp SFRH/BD/14035/2003. 1

2 GONÇALO TABUADA to derved equvalece, the category B oly depeds o C (wth ts ehacemet) ad ot o the choce of T. I the appedx, we show how to aturally exted a t-structure, cf. [2], o the compact objects of a tragulated category to the whole category. 2. Ackowledgmets Ths artcle s part of my Ph. D. thess uder the supervso of Prof. B. Keller. I deeply thak hm for coutless useful dscussos ad for hs perfect gudace ad geerous patece. 3. Prelmares Let k be a feld. Let E be a k-lear Frobeus category wth splt dempotets. Suppose that ts stable category C = E, wth suspeso fuctor S, has ftedmesoal Hom-spaces ad admts a Serre fuctor Σ, see [3]. Let d 2 be a teger. We suppose that C s Calab-Yau of CY-dmeso d,.e. [22] there s a somorphsm of tragle fuctors S d Σ. We fx such a somorphsm oce ad for all. See secto 4 of [18] for several examples of the above stuato. For X,Y C ad Z, we put Ext (X,Y) = Hom C (X,S Y). We suppose that C s edowed wth a d-cluster tltg subcategory T C,.e. a) T s a k-lear subcategory, b) T sfuctorallyftec,.e. thefuctorshom C (?,X) T adhom C (X,?) T are ftely geerated for all X C, c) we have Ext (T,T ) = 0 for all T,T T ad all 0 < < d ad d) f X C satsfes Ext (T,X) = 0 for all 0 < < d ad all T T, the T belogs to T. Let M E be the premage of T uder the projecto fuctor. I partcular, M cotas the subcategory P of the projectve-jectve objects M. Note that T equals the quotet M of M by the deal of morphsms factorg through a projectve-jectve. We dspose of the followg commutatve square: M E T E = C. We use the otatos of [15]. I partcular, for a addtve category A, we deote by C(A) (resp. C (A), C b (A),...) the categoryof ubouded (resp. rght bouded, resp. bouded,...) complexes over A ad by H(A) (resp. H (A), H b (A),...) ts quotet modulo the deal of ullhomotopc morphsms. By [21], cf. also [25], the projectofuctore E extedstoacaocaltraglefuctorh b (E)/H b (P) E. Ths duces a tragle fuctor H b (M)/H b (P) E. It s show [24] that ths fuctor s a localzato fuctor. Moreover, the projecto fuctor H b (M)

ON THE STRUCTURE OF CALABI-YAU CATEGORIES 3 H b (M)/H b (P) duces a equvalece from the subcategory HE-ac b (M) of bouded E-acyclc complexes wth compoets M oto ts kerel. Thus, we have a short exact sequece of tragulated categores 0 H b E-ac (M) Hb (M)/H b (P) C 0. Let B be the dg (=dfferetal graded) subcategory of the category C b (M) dg of bouded complexes over M whose objets are the E-acyclc complexes. We deote by G : H (M) D(B op ) op the fuctor whch takes a rght bouded complex X over M to the dg module where B s B. B Hom M(X,B), Remark 3.1. By costructo, the fuctor G restrcted to HE-ac b (M) establshes a equvalece G : H b E-ac(M) per(b op ) op. Recall that f P s a rght bouded complex of projectves ad A s a acyclc complex, the each morphsm from P to A s ullhomotopc. I partcular, the complex Hom M(P,A) s ullhomotopc for each P H (P). Thus G takes H (P) to zero, ad duces a well defed fuctor (stll deoted by G) G : H b (M)/H b (P) D(B op ) op. 4. Embeddg Proposto 4.1. The fuctor G s fully fathful. For the proof, we eed a umber of lemmas. It s well-kow that the category H (E) admts a semorthogoal decomposto, cf. [4], formed by H (P) ad ts rght orthogoal H E-ac (E), the full subcategory of the rght bouded E-acyclc complexes. For X H (E), we wrte px X a p X SpX for the correspodg tragle, where px s H (P) ad a p X s H E-ac (E). If X les H (M), the clearly a p X les H E-ac (M) so that we have a duced semorthogoal decomposto of H (M). Lemma 4.1. The fuctor Υ : H b (M)/H b (P) H E-ac (M) whch takes X to a p X s fully fathful. Proof. By the semorthogoal decomposto of H (M), the fuctor X a p X duces a rght adjot of the localzato fuctor H (M) H (M)/H (P)

4 GONÇALO TABUADA ad a equvalece of the quotet category wth the rght orthogoal H E-ac (M). H (P) H b (M)/H b (P) H (M) H (M)/H (P) H E-ac (M) = H(P). Moreover, t s easy to see that the caocal fuctor H b (M)/H b (P) H (M)/H (P) s fully fathful so that we obta a fully fathful fuctor takg X to a p X. H b (M)/H b (P) H E-ac (M) Remark 4.1. Sce the fuctor G s tragulated ad takes H (P) to zero, for X H b (M), the adjucto morphsm X a p X yelds a somorphsm G(X) G(a p X) = G(ΥX). Let D M (M) be the full subcategoryofthe dervedcategoryd(m) formedbythe rght bouded complexes whose homology modules le the subcategory Mod M ofmodm. The Yoeda fuctor M ModM, M M, duces a full mbeddg Ψ : H E-ac (M) D M (M). We wrte V for ts essetal mage. Uder Ψ, the category HE-ac b (M) s detfed wth per M (M). Let Φ : D M (M) D(Bop ) op be the fuctor whch takes X to the dg module B Hom (X c,ψ(b)), where B s H b E-ac (M) ad X c s a cofbrat replacemet of X for the projectve model structure o C(M). Sce for each rght bouded complex M wth compoets M, the complex M s cofbrat C(M), t s clear that the fuctor G : H b (M)/H b (P) D(B op ) op s somorphc to the composto Φ Ψ Υ. We dspose of the followg commutatve dagram H b (M)/H b (P) Υ H E-ac (M) Ψ D M (M) Φ D(B op ) op V HE-ac b (M) HE-ac b (M) per M (M) per(b op ) op Lemma 4.2. Let Y be a object of D M (M).

ON THE STRUCTURE OF CALABI-YAU CATEGORIES 5 a) Y les per M (M) ff H p (Y) s a ftely preseted M-module for all p Z ad vashes for all but ftely may p. b) Y les V ff H p (Y) s a ftely preseted M-module for all p Z ad vashes for all p 0. Proof. a) Clearly the codto s ecessary. For the coverse, suppose frst that Y s a ftely preseted M-module. The, as a M-module, Y admts a resoluto of legth d+1 by ftely geerated projectve modules by theorem 5.4 b) of [18]. It follows that Y belogs to per M (M). Sce per M (M) s tragulated, t also cotas all shfts of ftely preseted M-modules ad all extesos of shfts. Ths proves the coverse. b) Clearly the codto s ecessary. For the coverse, we ca suppose wthout loss of geeralty that Y = 0, for all 1 ad that Y belogs to projm, for 0. We ow costruct a sequece P P 1 P 0 of complexes of ftely geerated projectve M-modules such that P s quassomorphc to τ Y for each ad that, for each p Z, the sequece of M- modules P p becomes statoary. By our assumptos, we have τ 0 Y H 0 (Y). Sce H 0 (Y) belogs to modm, we kow by theorem 5.4 c) of [18] that t belogs to per(m) as a M-module. We defe P 0 to be a fte resoluto of H 0 (Y) by ftely geerated M-modules. For the ducto step, cosder the followg trucato tragle assocated wth Y S +1 H 1 (Y) τ 1 Y τ Y S +2 H 1 (Y), for 0. By the ducto hypothess, we have costructed P 0,...,P ad we dspose of a quas-somorphsm P τ Y. Let Q +1 be a fte resoluto of S +2 H 1 (Y) by ftely preseted projectve M-modules. We dspose of a morphsm f : P Q +1 ad we defe P +1 as the cylder of f. We defe P as the lmt of the P the category of complexes. We remark that Y s quas-somorphc to P ad that P belogs to V. Ths proves the coverse. Let X be H E-ac (M). Remark 4.2. Lemma 4.2 shows that the atural t-structure of D(M) restrcts to a t-structure o V. Ths allows us to express Ψ(X) as where τ Ψ(X) s per M (M). Ψ(X) holmτ Ψ(X), Lemma 4.3. We dspose of the followg somorphsm Φ(Ψ(X)) = Φ(holmτ Ψ(X)) holmφ(τ Ψ(X)). Proof. It s eough to show that the caocal morphsm duces a quas-somorphsm whe evaluated at ay object B of B. We have Φ(holm τ Ψ(X))(B) = Hom (holmτ Ψ(X),B), but sce B s a bouded complex, for each Z, the sequece Hom (τ Ψ(X),B)

6 GONÇALO TABUADA stablzes as goes to fty. Ths mples that Hom (holm τ Ψ(X),B) holmφ(τ Ψ(X))(B). Lemma 4.4. The fuctor Φ restrcted to the category V s fully fathful. Proof. Let X,Y be H E-ac (M). The followg are caocally somorphc : (4.1) (4.2) (4.3) Hom D(B op ) op(φψx,φψy) Hom D(B op )(ΦΨY,ΦΨX) Hom D(B op )(hocolm holm holm holm holm Φτ ΨY,hocolmΦτ j ΨX) j Hom D(B op )(Φτ ΨY,hocolmΦτ j ΨX) j hocolmhom D(B j op )(Φτ ΨY,Φτ j ΨX) hocolmhom perm (M)(τ j ΨX,τ ΨY) j Hom V (holmτ j ΨX,τ ΨY) j Hom V (Ψ(X),Ψ(Y)). Here (4.1) s by the lemma 4.3 see D(B op ), (4.2) s by the fact that Φτ ΨY s compact ad (4.3) s by the fact that τ ΨY s bouded. It s clear ow that lemmas 4.1, 4.3 ad 4.4 mply the proposto 4.1. 5. Determato of the mage of G Let L ρ : D (M) D M (M) be the restrcto fuctor duced by the projecto fuctor M M. L ρ admts a left adjot L : D M (M) D (M) whch takes Y to Y L M M. Let B be the dg subcategory of C (ModM) dg formed by the objects of D M (M) that are the essetal mage of the restrcto of Ψ to Hb E-ac (M). Let B be the DG quotet, cf. [8], of B by ts quas-somorphsms. It s clear that the dg categores B ad B are quas-equvalet, cf. [17], ad that the atural dg fuctor M C (ModM) dg factors through B. Let R : D(B op ) op D(M op ) op be the restrcto fuctor duced by the dg fuctor M B. Let Φ : D M (M) D(B op ) op be the fuctor whch takes X to the dg module B Hom (X c,b ), where B s B ad X c s a cofbrat replacemet of X for the projectve model structure o C(ModM). Fally let Γ : D(M) D(M op ) op be the fuctor that seds Y to M Hom (Y c,m(?,m)), where Y c s a cofbrat replacemet of Y for the projectve model structure o C(ModM) ad M s M.

ON THE STRUCTURE OF CALABI-YAU CATEGORIES 7 We dspose of the followg dagram : D(B op ) op Φ H b (M)/H b (P) Υ H E-ac (M) Ψ D M (M) Φ D(B op ) op B B L D (M) Γ R D(M op ) op M Lemma 5.1. The followg square D M (M) Φ D(B op ) op B s commutatve. L D (M) Γ R D(M op ) op Proof. By defto (R Φ )(X)(M) equals Hom (X c,m(?,m)). Sce M(?,M) detfes wth L ρ M ad by adjucto, we have Hom (X c,m(?,m)) Hom (X c,l ρ M ) Hom ((LX) c,m(?,m)), where the last member equals (Γ L)(X)(M). Lemma 5.2. The fuctor L reflects somorphsms. Proof. Sce L s a tragulated fuctor, t s eough to show that f L(Y) = 0, the Y = 0. Let Y be D M (M) such that L(Y) = 0. We ca suppose, wthout loss of geeralty, that H p (Y) = 0 for all p > 0. Let us show that H 0 (Y) = 0. Ideed, sce H 0 (Y) s a M-module, we have H 0 (Y) = L 0 H 0 (Y), where L 0 : ModM ModM s the left adjot of the cluso ModM ModM. Sce H p (Y) vashes degrees p > 0, we have L 0 H 0 (Y) = H 0 (LY). By ducto, oe cocludes that H p (Y) = 0 for all p 0. Proposto 5.1. A objet Y of D M (M) les the essetal mage of the fuctor Ψ Υ : H b (M)/H b (P) D M (M) ff τ Y s per M (M), for all Z ad L(Y) belogs to per(m). Proof. Let X be H b (M)/H b (P). By lemma 4.2 a), τ ΨΥ(X) s per M (M), for all Z. Sce X s a bouded complex, there exsts a s 0 such that for all m < s the m-compoets of Υ(X) are P, whch mples that LΨΥ(X) belogs to per(m). Coversely, suppose that Y s a object of D M (M) whch satsfes the codtos. By lemma 4.2, Y belogs to V. Thus we have Y = Ψ(Y ) for some Y H E-ac (M). We ow cosder Y as a object of H (M) ad also wrte Ψ for the fuctor H (M) D (M) duced by the Yoeda fuctor. We ca express Y as Y hocolm σ Y, M

8 GONÇALO TABUADA where the σ are the ave trucatos. By our assumptos o Y, σ Y belogs to H b (M)/H b (P), for all Z. The fuctors Ψ ad L clearly commute wth the ave trucatos σ ad so we have L(Y) = L(ΨY ) hocolm L(σ ΨY ) hocolm σ L(ΨY ). By our hypotheses, L(Y) belogs to per(m) ad so there exsts a m 0 such that By lemma 5.2, the cluso L(Y) = L(ΨY ) σ m L(ΨY ) = L(σ m ΨY ). Ψ(σ m Y) = σ m ΨY Ψ(Y ) = Y s a somorphsm. But sce σ m Y belogs to H b (M)/H b (P), Y detfes wth Ψ(σ m Y ). Remark 5.1. ItsclearthatfX belogstoper(m), theγ(x)belogstoper(m op ) op. We also have the followg partal coverse. Lemma 5.3. Let X be D modm (M) such that Γ(X) belogs to per(mop ) op. The X s per(m). Proof. By lemma 4.2 b) we ca suppose, wthout loss of geeralty, that X s a rght bouded complex wth ftely geerated projectve compoets. Applyg Γ, we get a perfect complex Γ(X). I partcular Γ(X) s homotopc to zero hgh degrees. But sce Γ s a equvalece projm (projm op ) op, t follows that X s already homotopc to zero hgh degrees. Lemma 5.4. The atural left asle o per M (M) op per(b op ) satsfes the codtos of proposto A.1 b). Proof. Clearlythe aturalleft asleu per M (M) op s o-degeerate. We eed to showthatforeachc per M (M) op, theresategern suchthathom(c,s N U) = 0 for each U U. We dspose of the followg somorphsm Hom perm (M) op(c,sn U) Hom perm (M)(S N U op,c), where U op deotes the atural rght asle o per M (M). Sce by theorem 5.4 c) of [18] a M-module admts a projectve resoluto of legth d+1 as a M-module ad C s a bouded complex, we coclude that for N 0 Ths proves the lemma. Hom perm (M)(S N U op,c) = 0. We deote by τ ad τ, Z, the assocated trucato fuctors o D(B op ) op. Lemma 5.5. The fuctor Φ : D M (M) D(Bop ) op restrcted to the category V s exact wth respect to the gve t-structures.

ON THE STRUCTURE OF CALABI-YAU CATEGORIES 9 Proof. We frst prove that Φ(V 0 ) D(B op ) op 0. Let X be V 0. We eed to show that Φ(X) belogs to D(B op ) op 0. The followg have the same classes of objects : (5.1) (5.2) D(B op ) op 0 D(B op ) >0 (per(b op ) 0 ) (per(b op ) op ) >0, where (5.1) we cosder the rght orthogoal D(B op ) ad (5.2) we cosder the left orthogoal D(B op ) op. These somorphsms show us that Φ(X) belogs to D(B op ) op 0 ff Hom D(B op) op(φ(x),φ(p)) = 0, for all P per M (M) >0. Now, by lemma 4.4 the fuctor Φ s fully fathful ad so Hom D(B op ) op(φ(x),φ(p)) Hom perm (M)(X,P). Sce X belogs to V 0 ad P belogs to per M (M) >0, we coclude that Hom perm (M)(X,P) = 0, whch mples that Φ(X) D(B op ) op 0. Let us ow cosder X V. We dspose of the trucato tragle τ 0 X X τ >0 X Sτ 0 X. The fuctor Φ s tragulated ad so we dspose of the tragle Φτ 0 X X Φτ >0 X SΦτ 0 X, where Φτ 0 X beloges to D(B op ) op 0. Sce Φ duces a equvalece betwee per M (M) ad per(b op ) op ad Hom(P,τ >0 X) = 0, for all P V 0, we coclude that Φτ >0 X belogs to D(B op ) op >0. Ths mples the lemma. Defto 5.1. Let D(B op ) op f deote the full tragulated subcategory of D(B op ) op formed by the objects Y such that τ Y s per(b op ) op, for all Z, ad R(Y) belogs to per(m op ) op. Proposto 5.2. A objet Y of D(B op ) op les the essetal mage of the fuctor G : H b (M)/H b (P) D(B op ) op ff t belogs to D(B op ) op f. Proof. Let X be H b (M)/H b (P). It s clear that the τ G(X) are per(b op ) op for all Z. By proposto 5.1 we kow that LΨΥ(X) belogs to per(m). By lemma 5.1 ad remark 5.1 we coclude that RG(X) belogs to per(m op ) op. Let owy bed(b op ) op f. Wecaexpresst, bythedualoflemmaa.2asthehomotopy lmt of the followg dagram τ 1 Y τ Y τ +1 Y, where τ Y belogs to per(b op ) op, for all Z. But sce Φ duces a equvalecebetweeper M (M)adper(B op ) op, thslastdagramcorrespodstoadagram M 1 M M +1

10 GONÇALO TABUADA per M (M). Let p Z. The relatos amog the trucato fuctors mply that the mage of the above dagram uder each homology fuctor H p, p Z, s statoary as goes to +. Ths mples that H p holmm lm H p M = H p M j, for all j < p. We dspose of the followg commutatve dagram whch mples that holm M τ holm for all Z. Sce holm that Φ(holm M holmτ M = M τ holmm M, M belogs to V, lemma 4.3 allows us to coclude M ) = Y. We ow show that holm M satsfes the codtos of proposto 5.1. We kow that τ holmm belogs to per M (M), for all Z. By lemma 5.1 (Γ L)(holmM ) detfes wth R(Y), whch s per(m op ) op. Sce holm M belogs to V, ts homologes le modm ad so we are the codtos of lemma 5.1, whch mples that L(holm Ths fshes the proof. 6. Alteratve descrpto M ) belogs to per M (M). I ths secto, we preset aother characterzato of the mage of G, whch was detfed as D(B op ) op f proposto 5.2. Let M deote a object of M ad also the aturally assocated complex H b (M). Sce the category H b (M)/H b (P) s geerated by the objects M M ad the fuctor G s fully fathful, we remark that D(B op ) op f equals the tragulated subcategory of D(B op ) op geerated by the objects G(M), M M. The rest of ths secto s cocered wth the problem of caracterzg the objects G(M), M M. We deote by P M the projectve M-module M(?,M) assocated wth M M ad by X M the mage of M uder Ψ Υ. Lemma 6.1. We dspose of the followg somorphsm for all Y D M (M). Hom D M (M)(X M,Y) Hom modm (P M,H 0 (Y)), Proof. Clearly X M belogs to D M (M) 0 ad s of the form P P 1 P 0 M 0, where P P, 0. Now Yoeda s lemma ad the fact that H m (Y)(P ) = 0, for all m Z, 0, mply the lemma. Remark 6.1. Sce the fuctor Φ restrcted to V s fully fathful ad exact, we have for all Y V. Hom D(B op ) op(g(m),φ(y)) Hom per(b op ) op(φ(p M),H 0 (Φ(Y))),

ON THE STRUCTURE OF CALABI-YAU CATEGORIES 11 We ow characterze the objects G(M) = Φ(X M ), M M, the tragulated category D(B op ). More precsely, we gve a descrpto of the fuctor R M := Hom D(B op )(?,Φ(X M )) : D(B op ) op Modk usg a dea of M. Va de Bergh, cf. lemma 2.13 of [7]. Cosder the followg fuctor F M := Hom per(b op )(H 0 (?),Φ(P M )) : per(b op ) op modk. Remark 6.2. Remark 6.1 shows that the fuctor R M whe restrcted to per(b op ) cocdes wth F M. Let DF M be the composto of F M wth the dualty fuctor D = Hom(?,k). Note that DF M s homologcal. Lemma 6.2. We dspose of the followg somorphsm of fuctors o per(b op ) DF M HomD(B op )(Φ(X M ),?[d+1]). Proof. The followg fuctors are caocally somorphc to DF Φ : (6.1) (6.2) (6.3) (6.4) (6.5) (6.6) DHom per(b op )(H 0 Φ(?),Φ(P M )) DHom per(b op )(ΦH 0 (?),Φ(P M )) DHom perm (M)(P M,H 0 (?)) DHom D M (M)(X M,?) Hom D (M)(?[ d 1],X M) M Hom D(B op ) op(φ(?)[ d 1],Φ(X M)) Hom D(B op ) op(φ(x M),Φ(?)[d+1]) Step (6.1) follows from the fact that Φ s exact. Step (6.2) follows from the fact that Φ s fully fathful ad we are cosderg the opposte category. Step (6.3) s a cosequece of lemma 6.1. Step (6.4) follows from the (d + 1)-Calab-Yau property adremark4.2. Step (6.5)sacosequeceofΦbeg fully fathful ad step(6.6) s a cosequece of workg the opposte category. Sce the fuctor Φ op establsh a equvalece betwee per M (M) op ad per(b op ) the lemma s prove. Now,wecosdertheleftKaextesoE M ofdf M alogtheclusoper(b op ) D(B op ). We dspose of the followg commutatve tragle : per(b op ) D(B op ) DF M modk The fuctor E M s homologcal ad preserves coproducts ad so DE M s cohomologcal ad trasforms coproducts to products. Sce D(B op ) s a compactly geerated tragulated category, the Brow represetablty theorem, cf. [23], mples that there s a Z M D(B op ) such that E M DE M HomD(B op )(?,Z M ). Remark 6.3. Sce the dualty fuctor D establshes ad at-equvalece mod k, the fuctor DE M restrcted to per(b op ) s somorphc to F M..

12 GONÇALO TABUADA Theorem 6.1. We dspose of a somorphsm G(M) Z M. Proof. We ow costruct a morphsm of fuctors from R M to DE M. Sce R M s represetable,byyoeda slemmatseoughtocostructaelemetde M (Φ(X M )). Let C be the category per(b op ) Φ(X M ), whose objects are the morphsms Y Φ(X M ) ad let C be the category X M per M (M), whose objects are the morphsms X M X. The followg are caocally somorphc : (6.7) (6.8) (6.9) (6.10) DE M (Φ(X M )) DcolmHom D(B op C )(Φ(X M ),Y [d+1]) DcolmHom C D M (M)(X [ d 1],X M ) DcolmHom D (M)((τ X M )[ d 1],X M ) M lmdhom D (M)((τ X M )[ d 1],X M ) M lmhom D (M)(X M,τ X M ) M Step(6.7)sacosequeceofthedeftooftheleftKaextesoadlemma6.2. Step (6.8) s obtaed by cosderg the opposte category. Step (6.9) follows from the fact that the system (τ X M ) Z forms a cofal system for the dex system of the colmt. Step (6.10) follows from the (d + 1)-Calab-Yau property. Now, the mage of the detty by the caocal morphsm Hom D M (M)(X M,X M ) lm Hom D M (M)(X M,τ X M ), gve us a elemet of (DE M )(Φ(X M )) ad so a morphsm of fuctors from R M to DE M. We remark that ths morphsm s a somorphsm whe evaluated at the objects of per(b op ). Sce both fuctors R M ad DE M are cohomologcal, trasform coproducts to products ad D(B op ) s compactly geerated, we coclude that we dspose of a somorphsm G(M) Z M. 7. The ma theorem Cosder the followg commutatve square as secto 3: M E T E = C. I the prevous sectos we have costructed, from the above data, a dg category B ad a left asle U H 0 (B), see [20], satsfyg the followg codtos : - B s a exact dg category over k such that H 0 (B) has fte-dmesoal Hom-spaces ad s Calab-Yau of CY-dmeso d + 1, - U H 0 (B) s a o-degeerate left asle such that : - for all B B, there s a teger N such that Hom H 0 (B)(B,S N U) = 0 for each U U,

ON THE STRUCTURE OF CALABI-YAU CATEGORIES 13 - the heart H of the t-structure o H 0 (B) assocated wth U has eough projectves. Let ow A be a dg category ad W H 0 (A) a left asle satsfyg the above codtos. We ca cosder the followg geeral costructo : Let Q deote the category of projectves of H. We clam that the followg cluso Q H H 0 (A), lfts to a morphsm Q j A the homotopy category of small dg categores, cf. [15] [26] [27]. Ideed, recall the followg argumet from secto 7 of [17]: Let Q be the full dg subcategory of A whose objects are the same as those of Q. Let τ 0 Q deote the dg category obtaed from Q by applyg the trucato fuctor τ 0 of complexes to each Hom-space. We dspose of the followg dagram the category of small dg categores Q A τ 0 Q Q H 0 ( Q). Let X, Y be objects of Q. Sce X ad Y belog to the heart of a t-structure H 0 (A), we have Hom H 0 (A)(X,Y[ ]) = 0, for 1. The dg category A s exact, whch mples that H Hom Q(X,Y) Hom H 0 (A)(X,Y[ ]) = 0, for 1. Ths shows that the dg fuctor τ 0 Q H 0 ( Q) s a quas-equvalece ad so we dspose of a morphsm Q j A the homotopy category of small dg categores. We dspose of a tragle fuctor j : D(A) D(Q) gve by restrcto. By proposto A.1, the left asle W H 0 (A) admts a smallest exteso to a left asled(a op ) op 0 od(aop ) op. LetD(A op ) op f deotethefulltragulatedsubcategory ofd(a op ) op formedbytheobjectsy suchthatτ Y sper(a op ) op, forall Z, ad j (Y) belogs to per(q op ) op. Defto 7.1. The stable category of A wth respect to W s the tragle quotet stab(a,w) = D(A op ) op f /per(aop ) op. We are ow able to formulate the ma theorem. Let B be the dg category ad U H 0 (B) the left asle costructed sectos 1 to 5. Theorem 7.1. The fuctor G duces a equvalece of categores G : C stab(b,u).

14 GONÇALO TABUADA Proof. We dspose of the followg commutatve dagram : C G stab(b,u) H b (M)/H b (P) G D(B op ) op f H b E-ac (M) per(b op ) op. ThefuctorGsaequvalecescets fullyfathful byproposto4.1adessetallysurjectvebyproposto5.2. ScewedsposeofaequvaleceHE-ac b (M) per(b op ) op by costructo of B ad the colums of the above dagram are short exact sequeces of tragulated categores, the theorem s proved. Appedx A. Exteso of t-structures Let T be a compactly geerated tragulated category wth suspeso fuctor S. We deote by T c the full tragulated sub-category of T formed by the compact objects, see [23]. We use the termology of [20]. Let U T c be a left asle. Proposto A.1. a) The left asle U admts a smallest exteso to a left asle T 0 o T. b) If U T c s o-degeerate (.e., f : X Y s vertble ff H p (f) s vertble for all p Z) ad for each X T c, there s a teger N such that Hom(X,S N U) = 0 for each U U, the T 0 s also o-degeerate. Proof. a) Let T 0 be the smallest full subcategory of T that cotas U ad s stable uder fte sums ad extesos. It s clear that T 0 s stable by S sce U s. We eed to show that the cluso fuctor T 0 T admts a rght adjot. For completeess, we clude the followg proof, whch s a varat of the small object argumet, cf. also [1]. We dspose of the followg recursve procedure. Let X = X 0 be a object T. For the tal step cosder all morphsms from ay object P U to X 0. Ths forms a set I 0 sce T s compactly geerated ad so we dspose of the followg tragle f I 0 P X 0 X 1 f I 0 P. For the ducto step cosder the above costructo wth X, 1, the place of X 1 ad I the place of I 1. We dspose of the followg dagram X = X 0 X 1 X 2 P P P f I 0 f I 1 f I 2 X 3 f I 3 P X where X deotes the homotopy colmt of the dagram (X ) Z. Cosder ow the followg tragle S 1 X X X X,,

ON THE STRUCTURE OF CALABI-YAU CATEGORIES 15 where the morphsm X X s the trasfte composto our dagram. Let P be U. We remark that sce P s compact, Hom T (P,X ) = 0. Ths also mples, by costructo of T 0, that Hom T (R,X ) = 0, for all R T 0. The log exact sequece obtaed by applyg the fuctor Hom T (R,?) to the tragle above shows that Hom(R,X ) Hom(R,X). Let X 1, 1, be a object as the followg tragle X = X 0 X X 1 S(X). A recursve applcato of the octahedro axom mples that X 1 belogs to S(T 0 ), for all 1. We dspose of the somorphsm hocolmx 1 S(X ). Sce hocolmx 1 belogs to S(T 0), we coclude that X belogs to T 0. Ths shows that the fuctor that seds X to X s the rght adjot of the cluso fuctor T 0 T. Ths proves that T 0 s a left asle o T. We ow show that the t-structure assocated to T 0, cf. [20], exteds, from T c to T, the oe assocated wth U. Let X be T c. We dspose of the followg trucato tragle assocated wth U X U X X U SX U. Clearly X U belogs to T 0. We remark that U = T 0, ad so XU belogs to T >0 := T 0. We ow show that T 0 s the smallest exteso of the left asle U. Let V be a asle cotag U. The cluso fuctor V T commutes wth sums, because t admts a rght adjot. Sce V s stable uder extesos ad suspesos, t cotas T 0. b) Let X be T. We eed to show that X = 0 ff H p (X) = 0 for all p Z. Clearly the codto s ecessary. For the coverse, suppose that H p (X) = 0 for all p Z. Let be a teger. Cosder the followg trucato tragle Sce H +1 (X) = 0 we coclude that H +1 (X) τ > X τ >+1 X SH +1 (X). τ > X m ZT >m, for all Z. Now, let C be a compact object of T. We kow that there s a k Z such that C T k. Ths mples that Hom T (C,τ > X) = 0 forall Z, sceτ > X belogsto(t k ). ThecategoryT scompactlygeerated ad so we coclude that τ > X = 0, for all Z. The followg trucato tragle τ X X τ > X Sτ X, mples that τ X s somorphc to X for all Z. Ths ca be rephrased as sayg that X NT.

16 GONÇALO TABUADA Now by our hypothess there s a teger N such that Hom T (C,U N ) = 0. Sce C s compact ad by costructo of T N, we have Hom T (C,T N ) = 0. Ths mples that Hom T (C,X) = 0, for all compact objects C of T. Sce T s compactly geerated, we coclude that X = 0. Ths proves the coverse. Lemma A.1. Let (Y p ) p Z be T. We dspose of the followg somorphsm for all Z. H ( p Y p ) p H (Y p ), Proof. By defto H := τ τ, Z. Sce τ admts a rght adjot, t s eough to show that τ commute wth fte sums. We cosder the followg tragle τ Y p Y p τ > Y p S( τ Y p ). p p p p Here τ Y p belogs to T sce T s stable uder fte sums. Let P be a p object of S U. Sce P s compact, we have Hom T (P, p τ > Y p ) p Hom T (P,τ > Y p ) = 0. Sce T s geerated by S U, τ > Y p belogs to T >. Sce the trucato tragle of Y p s uque, ths mples the followg somorphsm p Ths proves the lemma. p τ Y p τ ( p Y p ). Proposto A.2. Let X be a object of T. Suppose that we are the codtos of proposto A.1 b). We dspose of the followg somorphsm Proof. We eed oly show that hocolmτ X X. H (hocolmτ X) H (X), for all Z. We dspose of the followg tragle, cf. [23], τ p X τ q X hocolmτ X S( τ p X). p q p Sce the fuctor H s homologcal, for all Z ad t commutes wth fte sums by lemma A.1, we obta a log exact sequece p H (τ p X) q H (τ q X) H (hocolmτ X) p H S(τ p X) q H S(τ q X)

ON THE STRUCTURE OF CALABI-YAU CATEGORIES 17 Weremarkthatthemorphsm H S(τ p X) H S(τ q X)saspltmoomor- p q phsm ad so we obta H (X) = colmh (τ X) H (hocolmτ X). Refereces [1] L. Aloso, A. Jeremas, M. Souto, Costructo of t-structures ad equvaleces of derved categores, preprt math. RT/0203009. [2] A. Belso, J. Berste, P. Delge, Aalyse et topologe sur les espaces sgulers, Astérsque, vol. 100, Soc. Math. Frace, 1982. [3] A. Bodal, M. Kapraov, Represetable fuctors, Serre fuctors, ad recostructos (Russa), Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Math. 53 (1989), o. 6, 1183 1205, 1337; traslato Math. USSR-Izv. 35 (1990), o. 3, 519 541. [4] A. Bodal, D. Orlov, Semorthogoal decomposto for algebrac varetes, preprt MPIM 95/15 (1995), preprt math. AG/9506012. [5] A. Bua, R. Marsh, I. Rete, G. Todorov, Clusters ad seeds acyclc cluster algebras, preprt, math. RT/0510359. [6] P. Caldero, B. Keller, From tragulated categores to cluster algebras II, preprt math. RT/0510251. [7] D.Chrstese, B. Keller, A. Neema, Falure of Brow represetablty derved categores, Topology 40 (2001), o. 6, 1339 1361. [8] V. Drfeld, DG quotets of DG categores, J. Alg. 272 (2004), 643 691. [9] S. Fom, A. Zelevsky, Cluster algebras. I. Foudatos, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002), o. 2, 497 529. [10] C. Geß, B. Leclerc, J. Schröer, Rgd modules over preprojectve algebras, preprt, math. RT/0503324. [11] O. Iyama, Y. Yosho, Mutatos tragulated categores ad rgd Cohe-Macaulay modules, preprt preparato. [12] O. Iyama, I. Rete, Fom-Zelevsky mutato ad tltg modules over Calab-Yau algebras, preprt, math. RT/0605136. [13] O. Iyama, Hgher dmesoal Auslader-Rete theory o maxmal orthogoal subcategores, preprt, math. RT/0411631. [14] O. Iyama, Maxmal orthogoal subcategores of tragulated categores satsfyg Serre dualty, Oberwolfach report 6, 2005. [15] B. Keller, O dfferetal graded categores, preprt math. KT/0601185. [16] B. Keller, O tragulated orbt categores, Doc. Math. 10 (2005), 551 581. [17] B. Keller, Dervg DG categores, A. Scet. Ec. Norm. Sup. 27 (1994), 63 102. [18] B. Keller, I. Rete, Cluster-tlted algebras are Goreste ad stably Calab-Yau, preprt, math. RT/0512471. [19] B. Keller, I. Rete, Acyclc Calab-Yau categores are cluster categores, Oberwolfach report 23, (2006), 27 29. [20] B. Keller, D. Vosseck, Asles derved categores, Bull. Soc. Math. Belg. Ser. A 40 (1988), o. 2, 239 253. [21] B. Keller, D. Vosseck, Sous les catégores dervées, C. R. Acad. Sc. Pars Ser. I Math 305 (1987) o. 6, 225 228. [22] M. Kotsevch, Tragulated categores ad geometry, Course at the École Normale Supéreure, Pars, Notes take by J. Bellaïche, J.-F. Dat, I. Mar, G. Racet ad H. Radrambololoa, 1998. [23] A. Neema, Tragulated Categores, Aals of Mathematcs Studes, Vol. 148, Prceto Uversty Press, Prceto, NJ, 2001. [24] Y. Palu, O algebrac Calab-Yau categores, Ph. D. thess preparato. [25] J. Rckard, Derved equvaleces as derved fuctors, J. Lodo Math. Soc. (2) 43 (1991), o. 1, 37 48. [26] G. Tabuada, Ivarats addtfs de dg-catégores, It. Math. Res. Notces 53 (2005), 3309 3339.

18 GONÇALO TABUADA [27] G. Tabuada, Ue structure de catégore de modèles de Qulle sur la catégore des dgcatégores, C. R. Math. Acad. Sc. Pars 340 (2005), o. 1, 15 19. [28] M. Va de Bergh, No-commutatve crepat resolutos, The Legacy of Nels Hedrk Abel, Sprger, (2002), 749 770. Uversté Pars 7 - Des Dderot, UMR 7586 du CNRS, case 7012, 2 Place Jusseu, 75251 Pars cedex 05, Frace. E-mal address: tabuada@math.jusseu.fr