Gaussian Beams and Transducer Modeling

Similar documents
21. Propagation of Gaussian beams

1 ESO's Compact Laser Guide Star Unit Ottobeuren, Germany Beam optics!

Signal Loss. A1 A L[Neper] = ln or L[dB] = 20log 1. Proportional loss of signal amplitude with increasing propagation distance: = α d

Lecture 19 Optical MEMS (1)

Flaw Scattering Models

Mathematical modeling of the radiated acoustic field of ultrasonic transducers

- 1 - θ 1. n 1. θ 2. mirror. object. image

Doppler echocardiography & Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Doppler echocardiography. History: - Langevin developed sonar.

1. Consider the biconvex thick lens shown in the figure below, made from transparent material with index n and thickness L.

EE485 Introduction to Photonics

Gaussian Beam Optics, Ray Tracing, and Cavities

24. Advanced Topic: Laser resonators

PHYS 408, Optics. Problem Set 4 - Spring Posted: Fri, March 4, 2016 Due: 5pm Thu, March 17, 2016

Course Secretary: Christine Berber O3.095, phone x-6351,

Solutions: Homework 7

Propagation of EM Waves in material media

EM waves and interference. Review of EM wave equation and plane waves Energy and intensity in EM waves Interference

Vector diffraction theory of refraction of light by a spherical surface

THE PARAXIAL WAVE EQUATION GAUSSIAN BEAMS IN UNIFORM MEDIA:

Optics for Engineers Chapter 9

SUBSURFACE WAVES IN SOLIDS WITH CURVED SURFACE AND ACOUSTICAL IMPEDANCE ON IT

3 December Lesson 5.5

all dimensions are mm the minus means meniscus lens f 2

Plane waves and spatial frequency. A plane wave

Optics for Engineers Chapter 9

Wave Propagation in Uniaxial Media. Reflection and Transmission at Interfaces

Analysis of second-harmonic generation microscopy under refractive index mismatch

Chapter 2 Basic Optics

Simulation of Contrast Agent Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging based on Field II

Nature of Light Part 2

WAVES CP4 REVISION LECTURE ON. The wave equation. Traveling waves. Standing waves. Dispersion. Phase and group velocities.

Laser Optics-II. ME 677: Laser Material Processing Instructor: Ramesh Singh 1

Tutorial: Ray matrices, gaussian beams, and ABCD.app

1. Reflection and Refraction of Spherical Waves


PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICAL OPTICS

IMPRS: Ultrafast Source Technologies

Chapter 1. Ray Optics

Speed of Light in Glass

Offset Spheroidal Mirrors for Gaussian Beam Optics in ZEMAX

S. Blair September 27,

9 Atomic Coherence in Three-Level Atoms

Plane waves and spatial frequency. A plane wave

Propagation of Lorentz Gaussian Beams in Strongly Nonlocal Nonlinear Media

ULTRASONIC INSPECTION, MATERIAL NOISE AND. Mehmet Bilgen and James H. Center for NDE Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011

PHYS 110B - HW #5 Fall 2005, Solutions by David Pace Equations referenced equations are from Griffiths Problem statements are paraphrased

Fresnel Number Concept and Revision of some Characteristics in the Linear Theory of Focused Acoustic Beams

SEAFLOOR MAPPING MODELLING UNDERWATER PROPAGATION RAY ACOUSTICS

(a) Show that the amplitudes of the reflected and transmitted waves, corrrect to first order

Stress and Energy Transmission by Inhomogeneous Plane Waves into Dissipative Media

Focal shift in vector beams

Modeling Focused Beam Propagation in a Scattering Medium. Janaka Ranasinghesagara

Nonlinear effects in ultrasound fields of diagnostic-type transducers used for kidney stone propulsion: characterization in water

λ Fig. 2 Name: y direction. In what c) in the + y direction d) in the y direction e) in the x direction

36. Nonlinear optics: χ(2) processes

ACOUSTIC TRANSMISSION WITH MODE CONVERSION PHENOMENON

Modelling I. The Need for New Formulas Calculating Near Field, Lateral Resolution and Depth of Field D. Braconnier, E. Carcreff, KJTD, Japan

A small object is placed a distance 2.0 cm from a thin convex lens. The focal length of the lens is 5.0 cm.

THE ULTRASONIC FIELD OF FOCUSED TRANSDUCERS THROUGH A LIQUID- M. EI Amrani Intercontrole 13 rue du Capricome, Rungis Cedex, France

Scattering of Electromagnetic Radiation. References:

Waves in Linear Optical Media

The Physics of Doppler Ultrasound. HET408 Medical Imaging

3.1 The Plane Mirror Resonator 3.2 The Spherical Mirror Resonator 3.3 Gaussian modes and resonance frequencies 3.4 The Unstable Resonator

Two-Dimensional simulation of thermal blooming effects in ring pattern laser beam propagating into absorbing CO2 gas

The below identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

PHY2049 Fall11. Final Exam Solutions (1) 700 N (2) 350 N (3) 810 N (4) 405 N (5) 0 N

Lecture notes 5: Diffraction

4E : The Quantum Universe. Lecture 19, May 3 Vivek Sharma

Phys 531 Lecture 27 6 December 2005

Prolate Spheroidal Scatterer for Spherical TEM Waves

2.71. Final examination. 3 hours (9am 12 noon) Total pages: 7 (seven) PLEASE DO NOT TURN OVER UNTIL EXAM STARTS PLEASE RETURN THIS BOOKLET

Digital Holographic Measurement of Nanometric Optical Excitation on Soft Matter by Optical Pressure and Photothermal Interactions

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics 8.03SC Fall 2016 Homework 9

Conversion coefficients at a liquid/solid interface

= n. 1 n. Next apply Snell s law at the cylindrical boundary between the core and cladding for the marginal ray. = n 2. sin π 2.

Double-distance propagation of Gaussian beams passing through a tilted cat-eye optical lens in a turbulent atmosphere

36. Nonlinear optics: (2) processes

12. Nonlinear optics I

OPSE FINAL EXAM Fall 2016 YOU MUST SHOW YOUR WORK. ANSWERS THAT ARE NOT JUSTIFIED WILL BE GIVEN ZERO CREDIT.

If the wavelength is larger than the aperture, the wave will spread out at a large angle. [Picture P445] . Distance l S

12A Reflection & Transmission (Normal Incidence)

EM Waves. From previous Lecture. This Lecture More on EM waves EM spectrum Polarization. Displacement currents Maxwell s equations EM Waves

c 2011 Adam Julius Nagy ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Chapter 33: ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES 559

Summary of Beam Optics

Basic principles of the seismic method

Accumulated Gouy phase shift in Gaussian beam propagation through first-order optical systems

Phys 4322 Final Exam - Solution May 12, 2015

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON. SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, SPORTS and SCIENCES BENG (HONS) ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING EXAMINATION SEMESTER /2018

θ N e θ 0 θ 0 = λ A 0 (θ,φ) 2 sinθdθdφ = 1 (3) A i(θ,φ)a j (θ,φ)sinθdθdφ (4)

Constructive vs. destructive interference; Coherent vs. incoherent interference

Quantum Condensed Matter Physics Lecture 5

Final examination. 3 hours (9am 12 noon) Total pages: 7 (seven) PLEASE DO NOT TURN OVER UNTIL EXAM STARTS PLEASE RETURN THIS BOOKLET

Physics 20 Work Plan

gives rise to multitude of four-wave-mixing phenomena which are of great

Electrodynamics HW Problems 06 EM Waves

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING PUTRAJAYA CAMPUS FINAL EXAMINATION TRIMESTER 1, 2010/2011

LECTURE 23: LIGHT. Propagation of Light Huygen s Principle

Jackson 7.6 Homework Problem Solution Dr. Christopher S. Baird University of Massachusetts Lowell

Supplementary Information

Transcription:

Gaussian Beams and Transducer Modeling

Learning Objectives Characteristics of Gaussian Beams Propagation Laws Transmission/Reflection Laws Multi-Gaussian Beam Models for Ultrasonic Transducers MATLAB Examples

Fundamental Waves as Building Blocks z plane wave p = P exp 0 ikpz iωt P p= 0 exp ikpr iωt R spherical wave

z Gaussian beam P0 p p = exp ik z iωt exp + p ( z z0 ) izc R( z) w( z) ik beam width w 0 w( z) z w z = w ( z z0 ) + ( zc ) ( z ) 0 c z 0 z c = π w λ / 0 p beam waist confocal distance

z P0 p p = exp ik z iωt exp + p ( z z0 ) izc R( z) w( z) ik wave front curvature radius of curvature R( z) R z = ( z z0 ) + ( z c ) ( z z ) 0 z 0 beam waist z R z = z = z R z = z z >> z z 0 0, c

Gaussian profile z Gaussian beam P0 p p = exp ik z iωt exp + p ( z z0 ) izc R( z) w( z) ik wave front curvature spherical wave (paraxial approximation) z p P 0 ik p = exp ikpz exp z z can get from Gaussian beam by letting w 0 = z0 = 0

Paraxial Approximation x θ x 3 plane wave ( p θ p 3 θ ω ) p = Aexp ik x sin + ik x cos i t write as p = P( x, x3, ω) exp( ikpx3 iωt) where P( x, x, ω ) = Aexp ik x sinθ + ik x ( cosθ) 3 p p 3 quasi-plane wave traveling in the x 3 direction

Paraxial Approximation x θ x 3 (,, ω ) = exp sinθ + ( cosθ) P x x A ik x ik x 3 p p 3 P = kp p sin θ kp p θ x P ik = kp cos kpθ ( θ ) p p p x3 4 P kp p θ = kp p ( cosθ ) x 4 3 if θ <0.5 rad (about 30 o ) P P P <<,ik p x x x 3 3

Paraxial Approximation wave equation (cylindrical coordinates) with axial symmetry NOTE: here is a radius, not the density z p p p + z cp t = Let p = P(, z, ω) exp( ikpz iωt) 0 and assume then P P P << z z ik, p P P ik p 0 + z = paraxial wave equation

Paraxial Wave Equation P P ik p 0 + z = (,, ω) exp( p ω ) p = P z ik z i t Solutions P = P 0 plane wave P P 0 = exp ikp z z spherical wave P P0 p = exp + ik ( z z0 ) izc R( z) w( z) Gaussian beam

Complex form of the Gaussian beam commonly used ( 0) ik exp exp p p q( z) q p = p0 ik z q z ( 0) q z = q + z q ( 0) = z0 + iπ w λ p 0

Gaussian beam amplitudes obey the plane wave relationship p = mcpmvz density, not radius ( 0) ik exp exp p p q( z) q p = p0 ik z q z k = ω / c p p ( 0) ik exp exp p p q( z) q vz = v0 ik z q z ( 0) ik p exp ik pz exp p q cp q z q z 0 =

Reflection and Transmission at a Spherical Interface of radius R I, cp, cp R 0 pi pr p t z ik p i = % exp i p + ω 0 exp qi ( z) p P z ik z i t p r = % exp r p + ω 0 exp qr ( z ) p P z ik z i t ik p t = % exp t p + ω 0 exp qt ( z) p P z ik z i t ik z = z

Amplitudes are related through plane wave reflection and transmission coefficients c c P% P% R P% p p ( 0) = ( 0) = ( 0) r i p i cp + cp c P% P% i TpP% i c + c p ( 0) = ( 0) = ( 0) p p Phase terms are related by transmitted beam reflected beam c p cp = + qt cp R0 cp qi ( 0) ( 0) = + q R q r ( 0) ( 0) 0 i radius of interface

Transmission/reflection laws in terms of beam widths and wave front curvatures ( 0) = ( 0) = ( 0) w w w t r i c p cp = + Rt cp R0 cp Ri = + R R R r ( 0) ( 0) ( 0) ( 0) 0 i

, cp, cp Defocusing interface c > c p p (a), c p, cp Focusing interface c > c p p (b)

, cp, cp 0 Q p z ω z p ( z ω ) z,, z ( 0) q z = q + z ( ω) % ( 0) q p z P ik z ik p, = 0 exp( p ) exp q z q( z) ( ω) % ( 0) q Q q p z P T ik z ik z ik p, = 0 exp( p + p ) exp q z q Q q( z) q z = q Q + z q ( Q ) ( Q ) ( Q ) q = c q c + c R c p p p 0 p

Gaussian beam transmitted through a planar interface, cp, cp ( ω) % ( 0) z z q p z P ik z ik z ik p, = 0 exp( p + p ) exp q 0 + z% q( 0) + z% c z% = z + z p cp

Gaussian beams in multiple media, cp, cp 3, cp3 4, cp4 z z z3 z4 (, ω) = ( 0) q 0 q 0 p z P T M % M+ % m M+ m m+ qm+ zm+ m= qm zm ik M + pm + exp i kpmzm exp m= qm+ ( zm+ )

Propagation Laws ( 0) q z = q + z m m m m Transmission Laws q m+ ( Q ) m ( Qm) m( Qm) qm = c q c + c pm R0 c m pm+ pm+ pm Reflection Laws q ( Q ) m+ m = ( R ) 0 q m m q ( Q ) m m ( Q ) m +

ABCD Matrix Forms of the Laws q f = Aq Cq i i + B + D Propagation Laws Transmission Laws d d A B zm d d = C D 0 0 t t A B ( pm / pm t t = c + c ) cpm+ C D ( R0 ) c m pm Reflection Laws 0 r r A B r r = C D ( R0 ) m

Gaussian beams in multiple media ( ω) = T % ( 0) q p z P i t ik pm M, 0 exp[ ω 0] exp + + G G G G Aq 0 + B Aq( 0) + B G G C q ( 0) + D T M T mm + m= = % M + t0 = zm / c m= pm transmission or reflection coefficients G G d d t t t t d d A B AM+ BM+ AM BM A B A B... G G = d d t t t t d d C D CM+ DM+ CM DM C D C D

Gaussian beam after propagating through M+ media ( ω) = T % ( 0) q p z P i t ik pm M, 0 exp[ ω 0] exp + + G G G G Aq 0 + B Aq( 0) + B G G C q ( 0) + D Gaussian beam in single medium q ( 0) ik p p( z, ω) = P% ( 0) exp ikp z exp d d d d Aq ( 0) + B A q( 0) + B d d Cq ( 0) + D q ( 0) ik p p ( 0) ik z ( 0) = P% ( 0) exp exp q + z q + z d d A B z d d = C 0 D

Multi-Gaussian Beam Model circular piston transducer radiating into a fluid a v z v = 0 0 a otherwiase add ten Gaussians 0 z 0 n n n= ( ) v = v A exp B / a

add ten Gaussians p P ik p n exp p exp ( 0) ik z ( 0) = 0 0 % n= q + z n q + z n P% ( 0) n p 0 n q ( 0) = c v A n ik pa = B n /

function [a, b] = gauss_c % gauss_c returns the coefficients developed by Wen and Breazeale to model a % piston transducer a = zeros(0,); b = zeros(0,); a() =.48 + 0.9575*i; a() = 0.0600-0.0803*i; a(3) = -4.743-8.556*i; a(4) =.6576 +.705*i; a(5) = -5.048 + 3.488*i; a(6) =.7-0.68854*i; a(7) = -.006-0.6955*i; a(8) = -.5974 + 3.0*i; a(9) = -0.4840-0.393*i; a(0) = -0.0850-0.385*i; b() = 4.0697 + 0.76*i; b() =.53-0.933*i; b(3) = 4.4608 + 5.68*i; b(4) = 4.35 +4.997*i; b(5) = 4.5443 + 0.003*i; b(6) = 3.8478 + 0.078*i; b(7) =.580-0.30*i; b(8) = 3.397-4.8008*i; b(9) =.900-5.80*i; b(0) =.6340 + 5.009*i;

Multi-Gaussian beam model of a piston transducer in multiple media, cp, cp 3, cp3 4, cp4 ( ω) T z z z3 z4 ( 0) q p z P i t 0 n ik pm+ M+, = % n 0 exp[ ω 0] exp G G G G n= A q 0 B A q( 0) B + + n n G G C q ( 0) + D n

multi-gaussian beam model for a spherically focused circular transducer add ten Gaussians a F 0 z 0 n n n= 0 n= ( ) ( ) v = v A exp B / a exp ik / F ( n ) = v0 Anexp B% / a B% n = B + n ika F

a MATLAB multi- Gaussian Beam Model F R0, c z, c z p p ( x ) = ( x ) p, ω / p p, ω / cp v x 0 0 The time delay factor exp ik pz+ ik pz is not included in this model z % MGB_script % This script calculates the normalized % pressure, p/p0, due to a planar piston transducer radiating at normal % incidence through a spherically curved interface. % This is a multi-gaussian beam model that uses the 0 coefficients % of Wen and Breazeale to calculate the wave field. clear

MATLAB multi- Gaussian Beam Model % get input parameters f = 5; %frequency (MHz) a = 6.35; % transducer radius (mm) Fl = inf; % transducer focal length (mm) z = 0; % path length in medium (mm) z = linspace(6, 5, 00); % path length in medium (mm) r =0.0; % distance from ray axis (mm) R0 = inf; % interface radius of curvature (mm) d =.0; % density, medium (gm/cm^3) d =.0; % density, medium (gm/cm^3) c = 480.; % wave speed, medium (m/sec) c = 480.; % wave speed, medium (m/sec) These parameters are for a ½ inch diameter, 5 MHz planar piston transducer radiating into water (no interface). The on-axis pressure values from 6 to 5 mm are being sought.

MATLAB multi- Gaussian Beam Model % get Wen and Breazeale coefficients (0) [A, B] = gauss_c; % transmission coefficient (base on pressure ratio) T = (*c*d)/(c*d+c*d); h = /R0; % interface curvature zr = eps*(f == 0) + 000*pi*(a^)*f./c; % "Rayleigh" distance, ka^/ k = *pi*000*f./c; % wave number in medium

%initialize pressure to zero p = 0; MATLAB multi- Gaussian Beam Model %multi-gaussian beam model for j = :0 % form up multi-gaussian beam model with % 0 Wen and Breazeale coefficients b =B(j) + i*zr./fl; % modify coefficients for focused probe q = z - i*zr./b; K = q.*( -(c/c)); M = ( +K.*h); ZR = q./m; m =./(ZR +(c/c).*z); t = A(j)./( + (i.*b./zr).*z); t = t.*t.*zr.*m; p = p + t.*exp(i.*(k./).*m.*(r.^)); end

%plot magnitude of on-axis pressure plot(z, abs(p)) xlabel('z-axis') ylabel(' p / po ') >> MGB_script.5.5 p / po 0.5 0 0 0 40 60 80 00 0 40 z-axis

Cross-axis plot at z = 30 mm (near last maximum) % get input parameters f = 5; a = 6.35; Fl = inf; z = 0; z = 30; r =linspace(-0, 0, 00); R0 = inf; d =.0; d =.0; c = 480.; c = 480.; %frequency (MHz) % transducer radius (mm) % transducer focal length (mm) % path length in medium (mm) % path length in medium (mm) % distance from ray axis (mm) % interface radius of curvature (mm) % density, medium (gm/cm^3) % density, medium (gm/cm^3) % wave speed, medium (m/sec) % wave speed, medium (m/sec)

%plot magnitude of on-axis pressure plot(r, abs(p)) xlabel('r-axis') ylabel(' p / po ') >> MGB_script.8.6.4. p / po 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. 0-0 -8-6 -4-0 4 6 8 0 r-axis

Cross-axis plot at z = 65 mm (near last on-axis null) % get input parameters f = 5; %frequency (MHz) a = 6.35; % transducer radius (mm) Fl = inf; % transducer focal length (mm) z = 0; % path length in medium (mm) z = 65; % path length in medium (mm) r =linspace(-0, 0, 00); % distance from ray axis (mm) R0 = inf; % interface radius of curvature (mm) d =.0; % density, medium (gm/cm^3) d =.0; % density, medium (gm/cm^3) c = 480.; % wave speed, medium (m/sec) c = 480.; % wave speed, medium (m/sec)

>> MGB_script.4. p / po 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. 0-0 -8-6 -4-0 4 6 8 0 r-axis

Now, generate an image of the entire beam % get input parameters f = 5; %frequency (MHz) a = 6.35; % transducer radius (mm) Fl = inf; % transducer focal length (mm) z = 0; % path length in medium (mm) zt = linspace(0,00,500); rt =linspace(-0, 0, 00); [z, r]=meshgrid(zt, rt); R0 = inf; % interface radius of curvature (mm) d =.0; % density, medium (gm/cm^3) d =.0; % density, medium (gm/cm^3) c = 480.; % wave speed, medium (m/sec) c = 480.; % wave speed, medium (m/sec)

%plot magnitude of on-axis pressure image(zt, rt, abs(p)*50) xlabel('z-axis') ylabel('r-axis') Note: unequal scales >> MGB_script -0-5 -0-5 r-axis 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 40 60 80 00 0 40 60 80 00 z-axis

We can also examine a 0 MHz, 76. mm focal length focused transducer % get input parameters f = 0; %frequency (MHz) a = 6.35; % transducer radius (mm) Fl = 76.; % transducer focal length (mm) z = 0; % path length in medium (mm) z = linspace(0,00,500); % path length in medium (mm) r=0; % distance from ray axis (mm) R0 = inf; % interface radius of curvature (mm) d =.0; % density, medium (gm/cm^3) d =.0; % density, medium (gm/cm^3) c = 480.; % wave speed, medium (m/sec) c = 480.; % wave speed, medium (m/sec)

%plot magnitude of on-axis pressure plot(z, abs(p)) xlabel('z-axis') ylabel(' p/po ') >> MGB_script 0 8 p/po 6 4 0 0 0 40 60 80 00 0 40 60 80 00 z-axis

Now, plot an image of this focused transducer wave field % get input parameters f = 0; a = 6.35; Fl = 76.; z = 0; zt = linspace(0,300,500); rt=linspace(-0,0,00); [z, r]=meshgrid(zt, rt); R0 = inf; d =.0; d =.0; c = 480.; c = 480.; %frequency (MHz) % transducer radius (mm) % transducer focal length (mm) % path length in medium (mm) % interface radius of curvature (mm) % density, medium (gm/cm^3) % density, medium (gm/cm^3) % wave speed, medium (m/sec) % wave speed, medium (m/sec)

%plot magnitude of on-axis pressure image(zt, rt, abs(p)*5) xlabel('z-axis') ylabel('r-axis') Note: unequal scales >> MGB_script -0-5 -0-5 r-axis 0 5 0 5 0 0 50 00 50 00 50 300 z-axis