Solid Propellant Autonomous DE-Orbit System [SPADES] Co-authors: T. Soares J. Huesing A. Cotuna I. Carnelli L. Innocenti

Similar documents
Solid Propellant Autonomous DE-Orbit System [SPADES]

End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

IMPACT OF SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE MISSION DESIGN OF ESA SPACECRAFT

ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL AND SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION USING HYBRID PROPULSION SOLUTIONS

SOLID PROPULSION DE-ORBITING AND RE-ORBITING

COUPLED OPTIMIZATION OF LAUNCHER AND ALL-ELECTRIC SATELLITE TRAJECTORIES

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

OVERVIEW ON 2012 SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE

SECOND VEGA LAUNCH FROM THE GUIANA SPACE CENTER

Astrodynamics tools in the ESTEC Concurrent Design Facility. Robin Biesbroek CDF Technical Assistant ESA/ESTEC Noordwijk - NL

estec ESA Space Debris Mitigation Compliance Verification Guidelines

Spacecraft design indicator for space debris

GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL

Sustainable activities in space: Space debris problematic in a nutshell

OHB System AG, Universitätsallee 27-29, Bremen, Germany, (2)

11.1 Survey of Spacecraft Propulsion Systems

INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT AND THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS

CAS-ESA Call for small mission proposals - Technical annex

LAUNCHES AND LAUNCH VEHICLES. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE ON REAL SITUATION AT HIGH NEAR-EARTH ORBITS

THIRD VEGA LAUNCH FROM THE GUIANA SPACE CENTER

SENTINEL-1A LAUNCH CONTENTS. CONTACT & LINKS Press Contact Mario de Lepine

EUROPE ARIANE 1 ARIANE 1

Orbital Debris Mitigation

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Policy Updates

A BATCH LAUNCH FOR THE O3b CONSTELLATION

ASE 379L Space Systems Engineering Fb February 4, Group 1: Johnny Sangree. Nimisha Mittal Zach Aitken

Toshinori Kuwahara*, Yoshihiro Tomioka, Yuta Tanabe, Masato Fukuyama, Yuji Sakamoto, Kazuya Yoshida, Tohoku University, Japan

End-Of-Life De-Orbit Strategies

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Mission Design: A Pegasus Class Mission to a High Energy Orbit

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

Status of the European Student Moon Orbiter (ESMO) Project:

MULTI PURPOSE MISSION ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK MUPUMA

DEBRIS IMPACT ON LOW EARTH ORBIT SPACE MISSION

Effects of Mitigation Measures on the Space Debris Environment

OVERVIEW ON 2012 SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE

Successful Demonstration for Upper Stage Controlled Re-entry Experiment by H-IIB Launch Vehicle

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 15 Nov 2004

9 th US/Russian Space Surveillance Workshop

INITIAL STUDY ON SMALL DEBRIS IMPACT RISK ASSESSMENT DURING ORBIT TRANSFER TO GEO FOR ALL-ELECTRIC SATELLITE

CONSIDERATION OF SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN EARLY SPACECRAFT DESIGN PHASES

TUNDRA DISPOSAL ORBIT STUDY

RECENT SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE F.ALBY

December VV 06. LISA Pathfinder

INNOVATIVE STRATEGY FOR Z9 REENTRY

The time period while the spacecraft is in transit to lunar orbit shall be used to verify the functionality of the spacecraft.

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIA ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

The Launch of Gorizont 45 on the First Proton K /Breeze M

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

LOFAR on the Moon: Mission Configuration and Orbit Design

CONTROLLED DEORBIT OF THE DELTA IV UPPER STAGE FOR THE DMSP-17 MISSION

Space mission environments: sources for loading and structural requirements

SENSITIVITY OF THE SPACE DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT TO LARGE CONSTELLATIONS AND SMALL SATELLITES

MISSION ENGINEERING SPACECRAFT DESIGN

New 2d Far Field Beam Scanning Device at DLR s Electric Propulsion Test Facility

LIMITING ORBITAL DEBRIS

DE-ORBITATION STUDIES AND OPERATIONS FOR SPIRALE GTO SATELLITES

SPACE DEBRIS REMOVAL

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide SECTION 2. LV Performance

Prepared by A. Pasini Date: 27/11/2012. Agreed by L. Torre Date: 27/11/2012 Controllato da. Approved by L. Torre Date: 27/11/2012

Sirius talks Space economy: urgent need for new global regulation? Space Policy

Rapid De-Orbit of LEO Space Vehicles Using Towed Rigidizable Inflatable Structure (TRIS) Technology: Concept and Feasibility Assessment

PLANETARY MISSIONS FROM GTO USING EARTH AND MOON GRAVITY ASSISTS*

Marlene H. Dortch Secretary, Federal Communications Commission th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C

AAE SOLID ROCKET PROPULSION (SRP) SYSTEMS

XENON RESISTOJETS AS SECONDARY PROPULSION ON EP SPACECRAFTS AND PERFORMANCE RESULTS OF RESISTOJETS USING XENON

System and Concurrent Engineering for the e.deorbit Mission Assessment Studies Robin Biesbroek Jakob Hüsing Andrew Wolahan

SPACE DEBRIS BRAKING SYSTEM USING DERIVATIVE SRM FOR JUST-IN TIME COLLISION AVOIDANCE MANOEUVRE

Appendix Q Launch Debris and Staging Impact Locations

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

SPACE DEBRIS CHASER CONSTELLATION

SAFETY GUIDED DESIGN OF CREW RETURN VEHICLE IN CONCEPT DESIGN PHASE USING STAMP/STPA

A Regional Microsatellite Constellation with Electric Propulsion In Support of Tuscan Agriculture

General Assembly. United Nations A/AC.105/951

Chapter 4: Spacecraft Propulsion System Selection

LAUNCH SYSTEMS. Col. John Keesee. 5 September 2003

Net Capture Mechanism for Debris Removal Demonstration Mission

THE H2020 PROJECT REDSHIFT: OVERVIEW, FIRST RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES

Statistical methods to address the compliance of GTO with the French Space Operations Act

Prof. Richard Crowther Chief Engineer, UK Space Agency. Reflections on Orbital Debris Mitigation Measures

Lunar Mission Profiles for Commercial Space Operations

An Update on EUMETSAT Programmes and Plans. Dieter Klaes on behalf of EUMETSAT teams

Individual Adapter Solutions for Multi-Spacecraft Launches on Rockot

Technology Reference Studies

ASTRIUM. Minimum-time problem resolution under constraints for low-thrust stage trajectory computation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation

Sentinel-1B Flight Dynamics Operations during LEOP and Acquisition of its Reference Orbit: Achieving the Sentinel-1 Constellation

Propellant Gauging Experience with Meteosat Second Generation S/C Fleet

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide APPENDIX F. Proton Launch System Options and Enhancements

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Debris Mitigation in LEO Orbits: Performance Analysis and Comparison of different Deorbit Systems

EPIC Draft ROADMAP Incremental line

IAC-17-F Attitude State Evolution of Space Debris Determined from Optical Light Curve Observations

Lecture D30 - Orbit Transfers

Exhaustive strategy for optical survey of geosynchronous region using TAROT telescopes

EFFECTIVENESS OF THE DE-ORBITING PRACTICES IN THE MEO REGION

Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. & L Garde Inc.

RADIATION OPTIMUM SOLAR-ELECTRIC-PROPULSION TRANSFER FROM GTO TO GEO

GEO protected region: ISON capabilities to provide informational support for tasks of spacecraft flight safety and space debris removal

Figure 1. View of ALSAT-2A spacecraft

Transcription:

Solid Propellant Autonomous DE-Orbit System [SPADES] Co-authors: T. Soares J. Huesing A. Cotuna I. Carnelli L. Innocenti

SPADES introduction SPADES is: Cross-cutting system to support the compliance of future missions with the space debris mitigation requirements. Builds upon previous work and serves as a start point for future developments from ESA side in the area of solid propulsion de-orbit systems

SPADES introduction The advantages of solid propellant rocket motors for de-orbiting and also re-orbiting were known already for many years. However, a holistic approach where solid propellant based de-orbiting systems would be compared in detail and with respect of all different (concurrent) engineering fields, as used in ESA s CDF, to various other propulsive systems for a variety applicable spacecraft had never been conducted.

SPADES introduction Consulted CDF disciplines 1. Propulsion, GNC / AOCS, Thermal Control, Power, Communications, Data handling, Mission analysis, Configuration, Structural Analysis, Simulation 2. Programmatics and AIV, Technical Risk assessment, Cost analysis 3. Team Lead, System engineers, Technical Author, support for technical CDF facilities

SPADES introduction SPADES could serve on: 1. Larger LEO satellites, usually with hydrazine propulsion systems, that shall re-enter in a controlled way; 2. Upper stages and jettisoned components (e.g. SYLDA, SPELTRA) from GTO, to re-enter them in a controlled way / remove them from orbit immediately; 3. Small satellites in LEO without propulsion system, to make sure these re-enter within 25 years 4. Multiple Active Debris Removal missions, where clusters of solid rocket motors provide space debris with the required velocity increment for controlled deorbit.

SPADES introduction SPADES can be tailored to specific needs: 1. Provide basic velocity increment for de-orbiting (only the SRMs) 2. Autonomously de-orbit a spacecraft when control of the spacecraft has been lost (a complete system with SRMs, avionics, thermal control, communication etc.) NOTE: the SPADES system is installed in the satellite prior to launch.

BACKGROUND 1. ESA programs shall comply with IPOL and French space law: Reenter within 25 years Risk of casualties on ground shall be less than 1/10000 2. A possible way to deal with the issues of space debris is by introducing a velocity increment to the object In order to de-/re-orbit it. The introduction of these velocity increments has since the dawn of the space age in 1957 been realized with help of rocket technology 3. The main advantages of a solid propellant based system are the reliability, simplicity, relatively high specific impulse, high density impulse, relatively high thrust and the facts that the system could be made autonomous, due to its low power requirement and short operation time.

SPADES SYSTEM requirements SPADES shall be able to perform a safe controlled re-entry or re-orbit of the host system according to the Space Debris mitigation requirements from ESA IPOL using Solid Rocket Motors. SPADES shall be designed to be capable to de-/re-orbit different space objects from different Earth orbits. (LEO, MEO, HEO, GTO, GEO, Lagrange Points) SPADES shall be able to de-/re-orbit the host object after any end-of-life scenario, except after a fragmentation event. The mission requirements of the host mission shall not be altered due to the use of SPADES.

SPADES SYSTEM requirements SPADES shall only be activated through dedicated ground command. SPADES shall comply with the safety engineering requirements of ECSS- ST-Q-40C, which means a dual failure tolerance for functions that might cause a catastrophic event. Based on these requirements the study team designed a system that, similar to the clustered rocket motors, would be modular. That way the system can be built in a way that it is less or more dependent on host spacecraft systems according to the customer wishes.

SPADES SYSTEM modularity, basic package SPADES basic package applied to small spacecraft.

SPADES SYSTEM modularity, full independent The SPADES full independent package applied to large spacecraft

SPADES SYSTEM upper stages, sylda speltra De-orbiting SYLDA or SPELTRA (left) and an upper stage (right)

SPADES SYSTEM upper stages, sylda speltra Typical impact footprint for GTO Apogee de-orbit burn (Kourou launched Ariane 5ME) Typical impact footprint for GTO 3 rd Apogee de-orbit burn

SPADES SYSTEM upper stages, sylda speltra Typical impact footprint for GTO Apogee de-orbit burn (Kourou launched Ariane 5ME) Typical impact footprint for GTO 3 rd Apogee de-orbit burn 3 rd Apogee de-orbit burn: 23 m/s EOL of upper stage de-orbit burn 200 m/s + 73 m/s

SPADES SYSTEM in LEO

SPADES SYSTEM in GTO

SPADES SYSTEM comparison

MOTOR ADAPTATION Conceptual design of a solid propellant de-orbit motor (top), Adapted motor with intermediate propellant grain length (centre) Adapted motor with shortest propellant grain length (bottom)

CONCLUSIONS main 1. Solid propulsion combines high performance with low cost, and allows to expand the autonomy of the deorbit function. 2. Solid rocket motors for de-orbiting applications shall be cigarette burning, which allows for motor length adaptation (chopping) for easy customizing of the motor-delivered-total impulse. 3. De-orbiting LEO satellites with deployed appendages, is driving for motor / cluster design. 4. A minimum of 2, but preferably complemented with a small 3 rd, standardized motor designs are required to be able to de-orbit the complete range of applicable spacecraft.

CONCLUSIONS main 5. De-orbiting of other objects (large jettisoned launcher components, upper stages, GEO spacecraft) would require aforementioned motors to be chopped, which is relatively easy and incorporated in the design. 6. The de-orbit burn for Ariane 5 GTO jettisoned components / upper stages can take place in the favorable 3 rd apogee (23 m/s), avoiding land mass.

REFERENCES [1]: ESA/ADMIN/IPOL(2008)2 [2]: Frances Space Operations Act http://legifrance.gouv.fr/affichtexte.do?cidtexte=jor FTEXT000018931380 [3]: Solid propellant de-orbiting for constellation satellites, R.A.C. Schonenborg, 4th International Spacecraft Propulsion Conference, Chia Laguna, Italy, May 2004 [4]: Solid propellant de-orbiting and re-orbiting, R.A.C. Schonenborg, H. F. R. Schöyer, Fifth European conference on space debris, Darmstadt, Germany, 2009 [5]: CDF Study Report De-orbit, assessment of deorbit options, CDF-90(A), july 2009 [6]: Some considerations on the use of solid propellant de-orbit motors, H.F.R. Schöyer, Propulsion and aerothermodynamics division, ESA ESTEC, 1998 [7]: SPADES CDF Study Report SPADES, Assessment of Solid Propellant Autonomous Deorbit System, April 2013, CDF Study Report: CDF-137(A) [8]: Solid Propellant Autonomous De-Orbit System, Solid Propellant Rocket Motor Development, R.A.C. Schonenborg, et.al., Space Propulsion 2014, Cologne, Germany 2014

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank: All team members and contractors that contributed to the SPADES study. The financing authorities (GSP, TRP, GSTP, Cleanspace)