General Guidelines for Crash Analysis in LS-DYNA. Suri Bala Jim Day. Copyright Livermore Software Technology Corporation

Similar documents
Game Physics. Game and Media Technology Master Program - Utrecht University. Dr. Nicolas Pronost

Software Verification

Soft Bodies. Good approximation for hard ones. approximation breaks when objects break, or deform. Generalization: soft (deformable) bodies

Nonlinear analysis in ADINA Structures

CAEFEM v9.5 Information

INTRODUCTION TO THE EXPLICIT FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR NONLINEAR TRANSIENT DYNAMICS

Theoretical Manual Theoretical background to the Strand7 finite element analysis system

Bilinear Quadrilateral (Q4): CQUAD4 in GENESIS

A Standardized Mechanism to Validate Crash Models for Ductile Plastics

On the influence of shell element properties on the response of car model in crash test

Finite Element Models for European Testing: Side Impact Barrier to WG13 Pedestrian Impactors to WG17

Semiloof Curved Thin Shell Elements

Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000

Analyses of rubber parts in LS-DYNA implicit. Anders Jonsson,

New Representation of Bearings in LS-DYNA

A METHOD TO ASSESS IMPACT DAMAGE USING A SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS AND FINITE ELEMENT COUPLED APPROACH

SIMPLIFIED MODELING OF THIN-WALLED TUBES WITH OCTAGONAL CROSS SECTION AXIAL CRUSHING. Authors and Correspondance: Abstract:

14. LS-DYNA Forum 2016

Boundary Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis

Obtaining a Converged Solution with Abaqus

Project. First Saved Monday, June 27, 2011 Last Saved Wednesday, June 29, 2011 Product Version 13.0 Release

The Finite Element Method for Mechonics of Solids with ANSYS Applicotions

To study the effect of low velocity impacts on composite material buy using Finite element analysis software LSDYNA

Behavior of Tubular Hat Structure Under Three Point Bending

An Assessment of the LS-DYNA Hourglass Formulations via the 3D Patch Test

Simulation of the Crash Performance of Crash Boxes based on Advanced Thermoplastic Composite

Simulation of Impact Proof Testing of Electronic Sub- Systems

EQUIVALENT FRACTURE ENERGY CONCEPT FOR DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF PROTOTYPE RC GIRDERS

Pulley Mechanism for Muscle or Tendon Movements along Bones and around Joints. Tobias Erhart, October 2012

Outline. Advances in STAR-CCM+ DEM models for simulating deformation, breakage, and flow of solids

Presented By: EAS 6939 Aerospace Structural Composites

Frequently Asked Questions

2D Embankment and Slope Analysis (Numerical)

EXAMPLE OF PILED FOUNDATIONS

Nonlinear Buckling Prediction in ANSYS. August 2009

Contact analysis - theory and concepts

Outline. Tension test of stainless steel type 301. Forming including the TRIP-effect

ME 207 Material Science I

Non-linear and time-dependent material models in Mentat & MARC. Tutorial with Background and Exercises

Simulation of flow induced vibrations in pipes using the LS-DYNA ICFD solver

Thick Shell Element Form 5 in LS-DYNA

2D Liquefaction Analysis for Bridge Abutment

Anisotropic modeling of short fibers reinforced thermoplastics materials with LS-DYNA

Performance Evaluation of Fu Chang and Low Density Foam Model for Expanded Polypropylene

Modeling Hailstone Impact onto Composite Material Panel Under a Multi-axial State of Stress

Finite Element Simulation of Bar-Plate Friction Welded Joints Steel Product Subjected to Impact Loading

Composite Sandwich Structures with Honeycomb Core subjected to Impact

Development and Validation of the FAT Finite Element Model for the Side Impact Dummy EUROSID-1

Compact energy absorbing cellular structure

Introduction to Continuous Systems. Continuous Systems. Strings, Torsional Rods and Beams.

Calibration and Experimental Validation of LS-DYNA Composite Material Models by Multi Objective Optimization Techniques

Comparison between the visco-elastic dampers And Magnetorheological dampers and study the Effect of temperature on the damping properties

Upon Impact Numerical Modeling of Foam Materials

STEEL JOINTS - COMPONENT METHOD APPLICATION

Software Verification

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

Static & Dynamic. Analysis of Structures. Edward L.Wilson. University of California, Berkeley. Fourth Edition. Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering

Tire Standing Wave Simulation by 3-D Explicit Finite Element Method

MAE 323: Chapter 6. Structural Models

Statics. Phys101 Lectures 19,20. Key points: The Conditions for static equilibrium Solving statics problems Stress and strain. Ref: 9-1,2,3,4,5.

Testing Elastomers and Plastics for Marc Material Models

Axisymmetric Modeling. This tutorial gives an overview of axisymmetric modeling. Learn how to:

Technical Specifications

Modeling non-isothermal thermoforming of fabricreinforced thermoplastic composites

ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY AEA ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY REPORT. Appendix B8. Finite Element Analysis

Example 37 - Analytical Beam

Thomas Johansson DYNAmore Nordic AB. Drop Test Simulation

DISPENSA FEM in MSC. Nastran

Lecture 4 Implementing material models: using usermat.f. Implementing User-Programmable Features (UPFs) in ANSYS ANSYS, Inc.

MITOCW MITRES2_002S10nonlinear_lec15_300k-mp4

Investigation of the Shear Thickening Fluid Dynamic Properties and its Influence on the Impact Resistance of Multilayered Fabric Composite Barrier

Measurement of deformation. Measurement of elastic force. Constitutive law. Finite element method

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF DAMAGE IN THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE MATERIALS

1. A pure shear deformation is shown. The volume is unchanged. What is the strain tensor.

Terra-Mechanical Simulation Using Distinct Element Method

AERSYS KNOWLEDGE UNIT

Structural Dynamics. Spring mass system. The spring force is given by and F(t) is the driving force. Start by applying Newton s second law (F=ma).

Impact and Crash Modeling of Composite Structures: A Challenge for Damage Mechanics

3. Overview of MSC/NASTRAN

STRAIN ASSESSMENT USFOS

Getting Started with LS-DYNA FSI. Copyright LSDYNA-ONLINE.com. Chapter 5

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

Numerical modelling of the fluid structure interaction using ALE and SPH: The Hydrodynamic Ram phenomenon.

Damping of materials and members in structures

Numerical simulation the bottom structures. grounding test by LS-DYNA

Module 10: Free Vibration of an Undampened 1D Cantilever Beam

2D Kirchhoff Thin Beam Elements

USER S MANUAL. 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example. University of California: San Diego.

UNIT 1 STRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS 1. Define stress. When an external force acts on a body, it undergoes deformation.

Non-Linear Finite Element Methods in Solid Mechanics Attilio Frangi, Politecnico di Milano, February 17, 2017, Lesson 5

FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF SLIDING CONTACT BETWEEN A CIRCULAR ASPERITY AND AN ELASTIC URFACE IN PLANE STRAIN CONDITION

Comparison of LS-DYNA and NISA in Solving Dynamic Pulse Buckling Problems in Laminated Composite Beams

Simulation and Test Validation of Windscreen Subject to Pedestrian Head Impact

ANALYSIS OF LOAD PATTERNS IN RUBBER COMPONENTS FOR VEHICLES

A FAILURE CRITERION FOR POLYMERS AND SOFT BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS

On Mooney-Rivlin Constants for Elastomers

Advanced Friction Modeling in Sheet Metal Forming

Crashworthiness of composite structures: Experiment and Simulation

Technical Specifications

Transcription:

General Guidelines for Crash Analysis in LS-DYNA Suri Bala Jim Day Copyright Livermore Software Technology Corporation

Element Shapes Avoid use of triangular shells, tetrahedrons, pentahedrons whenever possible (ok in rigid bodies). ESORT=1 if triangular shells are present,*control_shell. ESORT=1 if tetrahedrons, pentahedrons are present,*control_solid. Warping Stiffness in Shells Warped shells are too soft. For warped B-T shells, set BWC=1 and invoke the more costly full projection for warping stiffness (PROJ=1) since drill projection inhibits rigid body rotation. For fully-integrated shell ELFORM=16, set hourglass formulation IHG to 8 to invoke warping stiffness.

Shells Invoke invarient node numbering (*CONTROL_ACCURACY) so that results are insensitive to the order of the nodes in the element connectivity. Shell thickness update (ISTUPD in *CONTROL_SHELL) is generally not need for crash analysis (req d for metal forming). Use minimum of 3 integration points through the thickness (NIP) for shell parts undergoing plastic deformation. Set shear factor in *SECTION_SHELL to theoretical value of 5/6. Turn on bulk viscosity for shells via *CONTROL_BULK_VISCOSITY Solids Use ELFORM=1 for solids and include appropriate hourglass control

Invariant Node Numbering η 4 3 η 4 3 ξ ξ 1 2 1 2 ξ 3 2 η ξ 3 2 η 4 1 4 1 default invariant node numbering invoked

Hourglass Control If using *CONTROL_HOURGLASS, define part-specific *HOURGLASS cards to overwrite the global hourglass definitions where appropriate. Be careful when importing validated barrier/head models Recommend stiffness hourglass control, IHQ=4, with hourglass coefficient QM = 0.03 for metal and plastic parts. Recommend viscosity-based hourglass control for foams and rubbers (IHG=2 or 3) or hourglass formulation 6 In soft materials, stiffness-based hourglass control (IHG=4 or 5) causes overly stiff response even with a reduced hourglass coefficient.

Materials When including strain rate effects in plasticity models, set VP=1. Uses plastic strain rate rather than total strain rate. Results in smoother response Stress-strain curves should be smooth, especially for foams. Mass of null shells and null beams is included in total mass. Unless additional mass is intentional, set density of null shells and beams to a small value. Curves defining constitutive data should have abscissa values in the anticipated working range. Curves will be extrapolated by LS-DYNA if necessary.

Connections Nodal rigid bodies Avoid 1-noded RB s and nodal rigid bodies with numerically insignificant inertia as these rigid bodies are deleted and a warning is issued to the D3HSP file. Joints Joint node pairs should be a reasonable distance apart. When increasing joint penalty factor to take out slop in penalty-based joint, the time step scale factor may need to be reduced to avoid instability.

Connections Discrete springs Spring nodes cannot be massless. If NON_LINEAR spring material is used, define stiffness in compression and tension. Use only N1 to N2 orientation. Deformable spotwelds Avoid free/suspended spotwelds. Look out for spotweld nodes that are not tied (see warnings in d3hsp). Exclude spotwelds from contact (automatic if MAT_SPOTWELD is used) Invoke stiffness damping in shells if using *CONTACT_SPOTWELD_TORSION Solid spotwelds show promise. Pro: Less sensitive to spotweld placement Con: No automatic spotweld generation

Rigid Bodies Refined mesh of rigid bodies encouraged. Added expense is minimal. More realistic mass properties and distribution of contact forces. Specify reasonable elastic constants for *MAT_RIGID, e.g., those of steel. Affects contact stiffness unless SOFT=2. Do not impose constraints on nodes of rigid bodies. Impose constraints on card 2 of *MAT_RIGID.

Inertia Considerations: Example shells solids

MMI: Mass Moment of Inertia units: mm, kg, ms Number of elements shells solids Element length LS-DYNA calculated MMI shells solids Actual MMI (solid) % Error solids 6 1 25 38.38 38.38 12.79 200% 24 8 12.5 25.59 19.19 12.79 50% 96 64 6.25 22.39 14.39 12.79 12.5% 384 512 3.125 21.59 13.19 12.79 3.1% 1536 4096 1.5625 21.39 12.89 12.79 0.8%

Initial Velocity Be careful with rigid body initial velocities. *PART_INERTIA supercedes all other initial velocity commands. If initial velocity of rigid bodies is inexplicably off, use double precision or use *INITIAL_VELOCITY_RIGID command. Make final check of initial velocity with a plot of velocity vectors at time = 0.

Contact Take care to account for shell thickness when generating the mesh. Avoid redundant contact definitions. Use only AUTOMATIC contacts. Premature nodal release from contact may lead to inconsistent answers. Increase contact thickness for very thin shells Use of IGNORE=1 is encouraged for contact in cases where small initial penetrations are reported. Use of SOFT=1 is preferred over SOFT=0, especially in treating contact between dissimilar materials. Use SOFT=2 for contact surfaces with sharp corners. Use AUTOMATIC_GENERAL for beam-to-beam contact.

Segment-Based Contact (SOFT=2)

Postprocessing Animate results to check for nonphysical behavior, for example, parts noticeably penetrating other parts. Check energies in GLSTAT and MATSUM Use *CONTROL_ENERGY to turn on computation of relevant energy values. Energy ratio should remain close to 1.0. Hourglass energy < 10% of peak internal energy. If no contact friction, contact energy in GLSTAT should be relatively small. If contact friction is nonzero, contact energy should be positive and not necessarily small. System added mass should be < 1% of physical mass (check GLSTAT)

Modeling Guidelines for Aerospace Analysis Automotive Crash guidelines are a good start. Differences in Automotive Crash and Aerospace Impact? Impact velocities and thus strain rates are higher in Aerospace applications. Material strain rate effects Material damage/failure/erosion Aerospace materials are generally lighter, stiffer, more complex.

Modeling Guidelines for Aerospace Impact Additional guidelines for Aerospace impact Time Step Reduce time step scale factor to 0.6 or 0.7. Hourglass Control Look at viscous-based hourglass control as first alternative. Use type 1 hourglass control with hourglass coefficient=1.e-3 for fluids. Bulk Viscosity Increase bulk viscosity coefficients by a factor of 10 for bird material.

Modeling Guidelines for Aerospace Impact Additional guidelines for Aerospace impact Contact When elements are eroded, use *CONTACT_ERODING with SOFT=1. Eroding_nodes_to_surface for Lagrangian bird strike. Eroding _single_surface otherwise Retain mass of eroded elements via ENMASS in *CONTROL_CONTACT Materials Include strain rate effects if data is available. For sandwich composites, invoke laminate shell theory (LAMSHT in *CONTROL_SHELL).

Effect of Deleted Nodes on Contact