Complementary Signed Dominating Functions in Graphs

Similar documents
A Note on Disjoint Dominating Sets in Graphs

STRUCTURE OF THE SET OF ALL MINIMAL TOTAL DOMINATING FUNCTIONS OF SOME CLASSES OF GRAPHS

A note on obtaining k dominating sets from a k-dominating function on a tree

Independent Transversal Equitable Domination in Graphs

Difference Cordial Labeling of Graphs Obtained from Double Snakes

ON INTEGER DOMINATION IN GRAPHS AND VIZING-LIKE PROBLEMS. Boštjan Brešar, 1 Michael A. Henning 2 and Sandi Klavžar 3 1.

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Odd-even sum labeling of some graphs

University of Alabama in Huntsville Huntsville, AL 35899, USA

GLOBAL MINUS DOMINATION IN GRAPHS. Communicated by Manouchehr Zaker. 1. Introduction

Harmonic Mean Labeling for Some Special Graphs

3-Chromatic Cubic Graphs with Complementary Connected Domination Number Three

Lower bounds on the minus domination and k-subdomination numbers

Transactions on Combinatorics ISSN (print): , ISSN (on-line): Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015), pp c 2015 University of Isfahan

ROOT SQUARE MEAN GRAPHS OF ORDER 5

New bounds on the signed domination numbers of graphs

ON DOMINATING THE CARTESIAN PRODUCT OF A GRAPH AND K 2. Bert L. Hartnell

A note on the total domination number of a tree

ALL GRAPHS WITH PAIRED-DOMINATION NUMBER TWO LESS THAN THEIR ORDER. Włodzimierz Ulatowski

Minimizing the Laplacian eigenvalues for trees with given domination number

INDEPENDENT TRANSVERSAL DOMINATION IN GRAPHS

Double domination in signed graphs

Graphs with few total dominating sets

Dominating a family of graphs with small connected subgraphs

Note on Strong Roman Domination in Graphs

ON GLOBAL DOMINATING-χ-COLORING OF GRAPHS

SUPER MEAN NUMBER OF A GRAPH

Fundamental Dominations in Graphs

k-difference cordial labeling of graphs

k-tuple Domatic In Graphs

Some New Approaches for Computation of Domination Polynomial of Specific Graphs

SQUARE DIFFERENCE 3-EQUITABLE LABELING FOR SOME GRAPHS. Sattur , TN, India. Sattur , TN, India.

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 6 Jan 2017

Properties of independent Roman domination in graphs

Roman dominating influence parameters

THE RAINBOW DOMINATION NUMBER OF A DIGRAPH

Sum divisor cordial labeling for star and ladder related graphs

Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society

EXACT DOUBLE DOMINATION IN GRAPHS

A Bound on Weak Domination Number Using Strong (Weak) Degree Concepts in Graphs

d 2 -coloring of a Graph

Skolem Difference Mean Graphs

CO PRIME PATH DECOMPOSITION NUMBER OF A GRAPH

DOMINATION INTEGRITY OF TOTAL GRAPHS

On Dominator Colorings in Graphs

Dominator Colorings and Safe Clique Partitions

Group connectivity of certain graphs

A Class of Vertex Transitive Graphs

A Study on Integer Additive Set-Graceful Graphs

CO TOTAL DOMINATION ON STRONG LINE CORPORATE GRAPHS. S.Padmashini 1 and K.Nagarajan 2. Sri S.R.N.M.College,

Changing and unchanging of Total Dominating Color Transversal number of Graphs

Total Dominator Colorings in Paths

Graceful Labeling of Some Theta Related Graphs

Super Mean Labeling of Some Classes of Graphs

Introduction to Domination Polynomial of a Graph

L(2,1)-Labeling: An Algorithmic Approach to Cycle Dominated Graphs

NORDHAUS-GADDUM RESULTS FOR WEAKLY CONVEX DOMINATION NUMBER OF A GRAPH

DOMINATION IN DEGREE SPLITTING GRAPHS S , S t. is a set of vertices having at least two vertices and having the same degree and T = V S i

Dominating Broadcasts in Graphs. Sarada Rachelle Anne Herke

Real and Integer Domination in Graphs

Cyclic Path Covering Number of Euler Graphs

Roman domination perfect graphs

D.K.M.College for Women (Autonomous), Vellore , Tamilnadu, India.

On Pairs of Disjoint Dominating Sets in a Graph

Further Results on Square Sum Graph

Radio Number for Square of Cycles

SEMI-STRONG SPLIT DOMINATION IN GRAPHS. Communicated by Mehdi Alaeiyan. 1. Introduction

The domination game played on unions of graphs

Characterization of total restrained domination edge critical unicyclic graphs

On Graceful Labeling of Some Bicyclic Graphs

Locating-Total Dominating Sets in Twin-Free Graphs: a Conjecture

Communicated by Alireza Abdollahi. 1. Introduction. For a set S V, the open neighborhood of S is N(S) = v S

Generalized connected domination in graphs

Vertices contained in all or in no minimum k-dominating sets of a tree

Extremal Problems for Roman Domination

On the metric dimension of the total graph of a graph

k-tuple Total Domination in Supergeneralized Petersen Graphs

Hamilton Cycles in Digraphs of Unitary Matrices

A LOWER BOUND FOR RADIO k-chromatic NUMBER OF AN ARBITRARY GRAPH

On graphs having a unique minimum independent dominating set

Irredundance saturation number of a graph

CCO Commun. Comb. Optim.

Technische Universität Ilmenau Institut für Mathematik

1. Introduction and Basic Definitions

On Odd Sum Graphs. S.Arockiaraj. Department of Mathematics. Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi , Tamilnadu, India. P.

Applied Mathematics Letters

2-bondage in graphs. Marcin Krzywkowski*

Double domination edge removal critical graphs

Integral Root Labeling of Graphs 1 V.L. Stella Arputha Mary & 2 N. Nanthini

Graceful Related Labeling and its Applications

2 β 0 -excellent graphs

An Ore-type Condition for Cyclability

International Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews

Nordhaus Gaddum Bounds for Independent Domination

All Ramsey numbers for brooms in graphs

Graphic sequences, adjacency matrix

On k-rainbow independent domination in graphs

Distance in Graphs - Taking the Long View

SUPER ROOT SQUARE MEAN LABELING OF SOME NEW GRAPHS

Magic Graphoidal on Class of Trees A. Nellai Murugan

Transcription:

Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, Vol. 6, 011, no. 38, 1861-1870 Complementary Signed Dominating Functions in Graphs Y. S. Irine Sheela and R. Kala Department of Mathematics Manonmaniam Sundaranar University Tirunelveli, India irinesheela@gmail.com karthipyi91@yahoo.co.in Abstract Let G = (V, E) be a graph. A function f : V +1, 1} is called a complementary signed dominating function of G if u/ N[v f(u) 1 for every v V with d(v) n. The weight of f is defined as w(f) = v V f(v). The complementary signed domination number of G is defined as γ cs (G) = min w(f) : f is a minimal complementary signed dominating f unction of G}. In this paper, we determine the value of complementary signed domination number for some special class of graphs. We also determine bounds for this parameter and exhibit the sharpness of the bounds. We also characterize graphs attaining the bounds in some special classes. Mathematics Subject Classification: 05C69 Keywords: Dominating function, Signed dominating function, complementary signed dominating function 1 Introduction By a graph we mean a finite, undirected connected graph without loops or multiple edges. Terms not defined here are used in the sense of Haynes et. al. [3 and Harary [. Let G = (V,E) be a graph with n vertices and m edges. A subset S V is called a dominating set of G if every vertex in V -S is adjacent to at least one vertex in S. A function f : V 0, 1} is called a dominating function of G if u N[v f(u) 1 for every v V. Dominating function is a natural generalization of dominating set. If S is a dominating set, then the characteristic

186 Y. S. Irine Sheela and R. Kala function χ S (V ) is a dominating function. A Signed dominating function of G is a function f : V +1, 1} such that u N[v f(u) 1 for every v V. The signed domination number for a graph G is γ s (G) = min w(f) : f is signed dominating function of G}. Signed dominating function is defined in [1. Definition 1.1 A caterpillar is a tree T for which removal of all pendent vertices leave a path. Definition 1. The wheel W n is defined to be the graph K 1 +C n 1 for n 4. Main Results Definition.1 A function f : V +1, 1} is called a complementary signed dominating function of G if u/ N[v f(u) 1 for every v V with deg(v) n. Weight of a complementary signed dominating function f is defined as w(f) = v V f(v). The complementary signed domination number of G is defined as γ cs (G) = min w(f) : f is a minimal complementary signed dominating function of G}. Theorem. γ cs (G) = (n 4) if and only if G = K n e. Proof. Assume that G = K n e. Assigning the values 1 to all the full degree vertices and the value +1 to the remaining two vertices produces a complementary signed dominating function that is minimum. Therefore γ cs (G) = (n ) + = (n 4). Conversely assume that γ cs (G) = (n 4)and let f be the corresponding complementary signed dominating function of G. Now γ cs (G) = (n ) +. Hence there exists exactly two vertices with function value +1. We claim that G has exactly two nonadjacent vertices u and v. We first prove that f(u) = +1. If f(u) = 1 then there exists at least one vertex w which is nonadjacent to u with f(w) = +1.But now x/ N[w f(x) 0 which is impossible. Thus f(u) = +1. Hence there exists exactly one v such that v is nonadjacent to u and f(v) = +1. Also u should be adjacent to all the vertices with function value 1. Clearly < v : f(v) = 1} > is a complete graph. Therefore G = K n e. Theorem.3 If every vertex of G is non-adjacent to exactly one or two vertices, then γ cs (G) = n.

Complementary signed dominating functions 1863 Proof. Let v be a vertex of G. If v is non-adjacent to exactly one vertex say w 1 and if f(w 1 ) = 1 then u/ N[v f(u) 0 and so f(w 1) = +1. Suppose v is non-adjacent to exactly two vertices say w 1 and w. If f(w 1 ) = +1 and f(w ) = 1 or f(w 1 ) = 1 and f(w ) = +1 then u/ N[v f(u) 0 and so f(w 1) = f(w ) = +1. In both cases, since v is nonadjacent to w 1, by the same argument f(v) = +1. Since v is arbitrary, f(v) = +1 for all v V (G). Hence γ cs (G) = n. Theorem.4 For any positive integer n 3, there exists a graph G with V (G) = n such that γ cs (G) = 0. Proof. We construct the required graph G as follows : Consider K n with V (K n ) = v 1,v,...,v n }. For every set S i of n vertices of K n, choose a vertex u i. Clearly 1 i n. For every i, draw an edge from u i to every vertex of S i. We claim that the resulting graph G is the required graph. Define f : V (G) +1, 1} by f(v i ) = 1 and f(u i ) = +1, 1 i n. By construction, f is a minimal complementary signed dominating function. Therefore γ cs (G) = n n = 0. Remark.5 For n, the graph in the above construction is the Hajo s graph. Remark.6 (1) For n, there is no graph G with γ cs (G) = 0. () For n =, by routine verification it is easy to observe that G = K 4 e is the only graph with γ cs (G) = 0. We now determine γ cs (G) for some special class of graphs. Theorem.7 For n, γ cs (K 1,n ) = 1 if n is even if n is odd Proof. Case (i) : n is even Let u be the central vertex of K 1,n and let v 1,v,...,v n be the other vertices. Define f : V (K 1,n ) +1, 1} by f(u) = 1 and f(v i ) = 1 if 1 i n +1 if n < i n

1864 Y. S. Irine Sheela and R. Kala Claim : f is a complementary signed dominating function. Let v be a pendent vertex with f(v) = 1. Then [ ( ) n n f(u) = ( 1) + n u/ N[v = (n ) + 1 + n Let v be a pendent vertex with f(v) = +1. Then n n f(w) = ( 1) + n w/ N[v = (n ) + n Therefore f is a complementary signed dominating function. n n f(u) = 1 + ( 1) + n v V (K 1,n ) = 1 (n ) + n If the number of vertices with function value 1 is increased by 1, a vertex with function value +1 will not satisfy the condition necessary for a complementary signed dominating function. Therefore 1 is the minimum value of v V (K 1,n ) f(v). Hence γ cs (K 1,n ) if n is even. Case (ii) : n is odd Define f : V (K 1,n ) +1, 1} by f(u) = 1 and u/ N[v f(v i ) = 1 if 1 i n 3 +1 if n 3 < i n Claim : f is a complementary signed dominating function. Let v be a pendent vertex with f(v) = 1. Then f(u) = ( 1) + n = (n 3) + 1 + n

Complementary signed dominating functions 1865 Let v be a pendent vertex with f(v) = +1. Then f(w) = ( 1) + n w/ N[v = (n 3) + n = Therefore f is a complementary signed dominating function. Now, f(v) = 1 + ( 1) + n v V (K 1,n ) = 1 (n 3) + n = If the number of vertices with function value 1 is increased by 1, a vertex with function value +1 will not satisfy the condition necessary for a complementary signed dominating function. Therefore is the minimum value of v V (K 1,n ) f(v). Hence γ cs (K 1,n ) = if n is odd. We observe that γ cs (P 3 ), γ cs (P 4 ) and γ cs (P 5 ). We now determine γ cs (P n ) for n 6. Theorem.8 For n 6, γ cs (P n ) = if n is even 3 if n is odd Proof. Let v 1,v,...,v n be the vertices of P n. Case (i) : n is even Define f : V (P n ) +1, 1} as follows : f(v 1 ) = f(v 3 ) = +1, f(v ) = 1 For 4 i n, +1 if i is even f(v i ) = 1 if i is odd We claim that f is a complementary signed dominating function. n n f(u) = ( ) + u/ N[v 1 =

1866 Y. S. Irine Sheela and R. Kala For i, 4, u/ N[v u/ N[v i u/ N[v i n n f(u) = ( ) + n n f(u) = ( ) + If i is odd and 5 i n, n n f(u) = + u/ N[v i = + 1 If i is even and 6 i n, n n f(u) = + = + Also u/ N[v n [( ) n f(u) = + = [( ) n Therefore f is a complementary signed dominating function. Since u/ N[v f(u), the labeling is minimum with respect to the vertices v 4,v 5,...,v n. If f(v n ) = 1 then u/ N[v 3 f(u) < 0. It is easy to observe that n n f(v) = + v V (P n) = is minimum. Hence γ cs (P n ) = if n is even. Case (ii) : n is odd. Define f : V (P n ) +1, 1} as follows : f(v 1 ) = f(v 3 ) = f(v n ) = +1 and f(v ) = 1. For 4 i n, +1 if i is even f(v i ) = 1 if i is odd

Complementary signed dominating functions 1867 For i, 4, u/ N[v i u/ N[v 1 u/ N[v f(u) = (3 ) + f(u) = (3 ) + = f(u) = (3 ) + = If i is odd and 5 i n then f(u) + u/ N[v i + 1 = If i is even and 6 i n 3 then f(u) + u/ N[v i u/ N[v n 1 + f(u) = (3 ) + u/ N[v n = f(u) = (3 ) = Therefore f is a complementary signed dominating function. Since u/ N[v n f(u), the labeling is minimum with respect to the vertices v 1,v,...,v n. If f(v 1 ) = 1 then u/ N[v 3 f(u) = 0. It is easy to observe that f(v) + is minimum. v V (P n) Hence γ cs (P n ) if n is odd.

1868 Y. S. Irine Sheela and R. Kala We observe that γ cs (C 4 ), γ cs (C 5 ) = 5, γ cs (C 6 ) =, γ cs (C 7 ) = 5, γ cs (C 8 ),γ cs (C 9 ). We now determine γ cs (C n ) for n 10. Theorem.9 For n 10, γ cs (C n ) = 4 if n is even 5 if n is odd Proof. Let u 1,u,...,u n be the vertices of C n. Case(i) : n is even Define f : V (C n ) +1, } as follows : f(u 1 ) = f(u ) = f(u 3 ) = f(u 4 ) = +1 1 if i is even For 5 i n, f(u i ) = +1 if i is odd We claim that f is a complementary signed dominating function. For i =, 3 u/ N[u 1 u/ N[u 5 f(u) + u/ N[u i u/ N[u 4 f(u) 3 + f(u) + f(u) + If i is even and 6 i n then f(u) + u/ N[u i

Complementary signed dominating functions 1869 If i is odd and 5 < i < n then f(u) + u/ N[u i u/ N[u n = 5 f(u) + Therefore f is a complementary signed dominating function. Since f(u), the labeling is minimum with respect to the vertices u/ N[u u 4, u 5,..., u n 1, u n. If f(u 5 ) = 1, then f(u) < 0. It is easy to observe u/ N[u 3 that f(u) is minimum. Hence γ cs (C n ) if n is even. u V (C n) Case(ii) : n is odd Define f : V (C n ) +1, } as follows : f(u 1 ) = f(u ) = f(u 3 ) = f(u 4 ) = f(u 5 ) = +1 1 if i is even For 6 i n, f(u i ) = +1 if i is odd. We claim that f is a complementary signed dominating function. [( ) ( ) f(u) = 5 + u/ N[u 1 For i =, 3, 4 u/ N[u 5 u/ N[u 6 u/ N[u i = f(u) = 5 3 + = f(u) = 5 + f(u) = 5 +

1870 Y. S. Irine Sheela and R. Kala If i is odd and 7 i n, then f(u) = 5 + u/ N[u i = 5 + = 6 If i is even and 8 i < n, then f(u) = 5 + Also u/ N[u i u/ N[u n f(u) = 5 + Therefore f is a complementary signed dominating function. Since f(u) =, the labeling is minimum with respect to the vertices u/ N[u 4 u 1, u, u 6,..., u n. If f(u 1 ) = 1, then f(u) = 0. It is easy to observe that u V (C n) Hence γ cs (C n ) = 5 if n is odd. References u/ N[u 3 f(u) = 5 + = 5 is minimum. [1 J. E. Dunbar, S. T. Hedetniemi, M.A. Henning and P. J. Slater, Signed domination in graphs, In Y. Alavi and A. J. Schwenk, editors, Graph theory, Combinatorics and applications, Proc. 7th International Conf. Combinatorics, Graph theory, Applications, Volume 1, pages 311-3, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,1995 [ Harary. F, Graph theory, Reading mass, 1969. [3 Teresa W. Haynes, S.T. Hedetniemi and Peter J. Slater, Fundamentals of domination in graphs, Marcel Dekker, 1998. Received: April, 011