The Riemann-Roch Theorem

Similar documents
The Riemann-Roch Theorem

The Riemann-Roch Theorem

Atiyah-Singer Revisited

WHAT IS K-HOMOLOGY? Paul Baum Penn State. Texas A&M University College Station, Texas, USA. April 2, 2014

Dirac Operator. Texas A&M University College Station, Texas, USA. Paul Baum Penn State. March 31, 2014

Dirac Operator. Göttingen Mathematical Institute. Paul Baum Penn State 6 February, 2017

Recall for an n n matrix A = (a ij ), its trace is defined by. a jj. It has properties: In particular, if B is non-singular n n matrix,

The Canonical Sheaf. Stefano Filipazzi. September 14, 2015

Hochschild homology and Grothendieck Duality

APPENDIX 1: REVIEW OF SINGULAR COHOMOLOGY

NOTES ON DIVISORS AND RIEMANN-ROCH

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

BEYOND ELLIPTICITY. Paul Baum Penn State. Fields Institute Toronto, Canada. June 20, 2013

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection

Topology of Toric Varieties, Part II

Algebraic Cobordism Lecture 1: Complex cobordism and algebraic cobordism

Celebrating One Hundred Fifty Years of. Topology. ARBEITSTAGUNG Bonn, May 22, 2013

GK-SEMINAR SS2015: SHEAF COHOMOLOGY

3. Lecture 3. Y Z[1/p]Hom (Sch/k) (Y, X).

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

Categories and functors

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES

HODGE GENERA OF ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES, II.

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces

Math 797W Homework 4

RIEMANN S INEQUALITY AND RIEMANN-ROCH

Topics in Algebraic Geometry

K-Homology, Assembly and Rigidity Theorems for Relative Eta Invariants

Chern numbers and Hilbert Modular Varieties

SERRE FINITENESS AND SERRE VANISHING FOR NON-COMMUTATIVE P 1 -BUNDLES ADAM NYMAN

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

x X p K i (k(x)) K i 1 (M p+1 )

Contents. Chapter 3. Local Rings and Varieties Rings of Germs of Holomorphic Functions Hilbert s Basis Theorem 39.

Algebraic Cobordism. 2nd German-Chinese Conference on Complex Geometry East China Normal University Shanghai-September 11-16, 2006.

ON COSTELLO S CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITTEN GENUS: L SPACES AND DG-MANIFOLDS

Algebraic Topology II Notes Week 12

Derived categories, perverse sheaves and intermediate extension functor

THE GROTHENDIECK-RIEMANN-ROCH THEOREM FOR VARIETIES

HODGE NUMBERS OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS

Algebraic v.s. Analytic Point of View

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem

COMPLEX ALGEBRAIC SURFACES CLASS 4

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 37

Contributors. Preface

FROM HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS TO HOLOMORPHIC SECTIONS

Diagonal Subschemes and Vector Bundles

Useful theorems in complex geometry

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 43

A First Lecture on Sheaf Cohomology

Hodge Theory of Maps

MT845: ALGEBRAIC CURVES

Riemann Surfaces and Algebraic Curves

Constructible Derived Category

Theta divisors and the Frobenius morphism

An introduction to calculus of functors

Operator Algebras II, Homological functors, derived functors, Adams spectral sequence, assembly map and BC for compact quantum groups.

Some remarks on symmetric correspondences

An Introduction to Spectral Sequences

Elliptic curves, Néron models, and duality

MODULI TOPOLOGY. 1. Grothendieck Topology

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

Mini-Course on Moduli Spaces

An overview of D-modules: holonomic D-modules, b-functions, and V -filtrations

A TASTE OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL COMPLEX ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY. We also have an isomorphism of holomorphic vector bundles

Algebraic cycle complexes

BERTRAND GUILLOU. s G q+r

6. Lecture cdh and Nisnevich topologies. These are Grothendieck topologies which play an important role in Suslin-Voevodsky s approach to not

Cohomology jump loci of local systems

Abelian Varieties and the Fourier Mukai transformations (Foschungsseminar 2005)

Arithmetic of certain integrable systems. University of Chicago & Vietnam Institute for Advanced Study in Mathematics

Math 248B. Applications of base change for coherent cohomology

Crystalline Cohomology and Frobenius

MIXED HODGE MODULES PAVEL SAFRONOV

Università degli Studi di Padova

ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY HANDOUT 5: K 0 OF SCHEMES, THE LOCALIZATION SEQUENCE FOR G 0.

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

IND-COHERENT SHEAVES AND SERRE DUALITY II. 1. Introduction

THE ARITHMETIC GROTHENDIECK-RIEMANN-ROCH THEOREM FOR GENERAL PROJECTIVE MORPHISMS

ABEL S THEOREM BEN DRIBUS

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday September 1, 2015 (Day 1)

Coherent sheaves on elliptic curves.

Geometry Qualifying Exam Notes

COMPLEX ALGEBRAIC SURFACES CLASS 9

What is a motive? Johan M. Commelin March 3, 2014

Duality, Residues, Fundamental class

LECTURES ON ALGEBRAIC CYCLES

THE JACOBIAN OF A RIEMANN SURFACE

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, )

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

Some remarks on Frobenius and Lefschetz in étale cohomology

NAIVE MOTIVIC DONALDSON THOMAS TYPE HIRZEBRUCH CLASSES AND SOME PROBLEMS

1 Structures 2. 2 Framework of Riemann surfaces Basic configuration Holomorphic functions... 3

The Theorem of Gauß-Bonnet in Complex Analysis 1

Remarks on the Milnor number

Kähler manifolds and variations of Hodge structures

The Mukai pairing, I: a categorical approach

A GENERALIZED QUOT SCHEME AND MEROMORPHIC VORTICES

Homework 3: Relative homology and excision

RTG Mini-Course Perspectives in Geometry Series

Transcription:

The Riemann-Roch Theorem Paul Baum Penn State TIFR Mumbai, India 20 February, 2013

THE RIEMANN-ROCH THEOREM Topics in this talk : 1. Classical Riemann-Roch 2. Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch (HRR) 3. Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch (GRR) 4. RR for possibly singular varieties (Baum-Fulton-MacPherson)

CLASSSICAL RIEMANN - ROCH M compact connected Riemann surface genus of M = # of holes = 1 2 [rankh 1(M; Z)]

D a divisor of M D consists of a finite set of points of M p 1, p 2,..., p l and an integer assigned to each point n 1, n 2,..., n l Equivalently D is a function D : M Z with finite support Support(D) = {p M D(p) 0} Support(D) is a finite subset of M

D a divisor on M deg(d) := p M D(p) Remark D 1, D 2 two divisors D 1 D 2 iff p M, D 1 (p) D 2 (p) Remark D a divisor, D is ( D)(p) = D(p)

Example Let f : M C { } be a meromorphic function. Define a divisor δ(f) by: 0 if p is neither a zero nor a pole of f δ(f)(p) = order of the zero if f(p) = 0 (order of the pole) if p is a pole of f

Example Let ω be a meromorphic 1-form on M. Locally ω is f(z)dz where f is a (locally defined) meromorphic function. Define a divisor δ(ω) by: 0 if p is neither a zero nor a pole of ω δ(ω)(p) = order of the zero if ω(p) = 0 (order of the pole) if p is a pole of ω

D a divisor on M { } meromorphic functions H 0 (M, D) := δ(f) D f : M C { } { } meromorphic 1-forms H 1 (M, D) := ω on M δ(ω) D Lemma H 0 (M, D) and H 1 (M, D) are finite dimensional C vector spaces dim C H 0 (M, D) < dim C H 1 (M, D) <

Theorem (RR) Let M be a compact connected Riemann surface and let D be a divisor on M. Then: dim C H 0 (M, D) dim C H 1 (M, D) = d g + 1 d = degree (D) g = genus (M)

HIRZEBRUCH-RIEMANN-ROCH M non-singular projective algebraic variety / C E an algebraic vector bundle on M E = sheaf of germs of algebraic sections of E H j (M, E) := j-th cohomology of M using E, j = 0, 1, 2, 3,...

LEMMA For all j = 0, 1, 2,... dim C H j (M, E) <. For all j > dim C (M), H j (M, E) = 0. χ(m, E) := n = dim C (M) n ( 1) j dim C H j (M, E) j=0 THEOREM[HRR] Let M be a non-singular projective algebraic variety / C and let E be an algebraic vector bundle on M. Then χ(m, E) = (ch(e) T d(m))[m]

Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch Theorem (HRR) Let M be a non-singular projective algebraic variety / C and let E be an algebraic vector bundle on M. Then χ(m, E) = (ch(e) T d(m))[m]

EXAMPLE. Let M be a compact complex-analytic manifold. Set Ω p,q = C (M, Λ p,q T M) Ω p,q is the C vector space of all C differential forms of type (p, q) Dolbeault complex 0 Ω 0,0 Ω 0,1 Ω 0,2 Ω 0,n 0 The Dirac operator (of the underlying Spin c manifold) is the assembled Dolbeault complex + : j Ω 0, 2j j 0, 2j+1 Ω The index of this operator is the arithmetic genus of M i.e. is the Euler number of the Dolbeault complex.

K-theory and K-homology in algebraic geometry Let X be a (possibly singular) projective algebraic variety / C. Grothendieck defined two abelian groups: Kalg 0 (X) = Grothendieck group of algebraic vector bundles on X. K alg 0 (X) = Grothendieck group of coherent algebraic sheaves on X. Kalg 0 (X) = the algebraic geometry K-theory of X contravariant. K alg 0 (X) = the algebraic geometry K-homology of X covariant.

K-theory in algebraic geometry Vect alg X = set of isomorphism classes of algebraic vector bundles on X. A(Vect alg X) = free abelian group with one generator for each element [E] Vect alg X. For each short exact sequence ξ 0 E E E 0 of algebraic vector bundles on X, let r(ξ) A(Vect alg X) be r(ξ) := [E ] + [E ] [E]

K-theory in algebraic geometry R A(Vect alg (X)) is the subgroup of A(Vect alg X) generated by all r(ξ) A(Vect alg X). DEFINITION. K 0 alg (X) := A(Vect algx)/r Let X, Y be (possibly singular) projective algebraic varieties /C. Let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then have the map of abelian groups f : K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) [f E] [E] Vector bundles pull back. f E is the pull-back via f of E.

K-homology in algebraic geometry S alg X = set of isomorphism classes of coherent algebraic sheaves on X. A(S alg X) = free abelian group with one generator for each element [E] S alg X. For each short exact sequence ξ 0 E E E 0 of coherent algebraic sheaves on X, let r(ξ) A(S alg X) be r(ξ) := [E ] + [E ] [E]

K-homology in algebraic geometry R A(S alg (X)) is the subgroup of A(S alg X) generated by all r(ξ) A(S alg X). DEFINITION. K alg 0 (X) := A(S alg X)/R Let X, Y be (possibly singular) projective algebraic varieties /C. Let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then have the map of abelian groups f : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 (Y ) [E] Σ j ( 1) j [(R j f)e]

f : X Y morphism of algebraic varieties E coherent algebraic sheaf on X For j 0, define a presheaf (W j f)e on Y by U H j (f 1 U; E f 1 U) U an open subset of Y Then (R j f)e := the sheafification of (W j f)e

f : X Y morphism of algebraic varieties f : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 (Y ) [E] Σ j ( 1) j [(R j f)e]

SPECIAL CASE of f : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 (Y ) Y is a point. Y = ɛ: X is the map of X to a point. Kalg 0 ( ) = Kalg 0 ( ) = Z ɛ : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 ( ) = Z ɛ (E) = χ(x; E) = Σ j ( 1) j dim C H j (X; E)

X non-singular = K 0 alg (X) = K alg 0 (X) Let X be non-singular. Let E be an algebraic vector bundle on X. E denotes the sheaf of germs of algebraic sections of E. Then E E is an isomorphism of abelian groups Kalg 0 (X) Kalg 0 (X) This is Poincaré duality within the context of algebraic geometry K-theory&K-homology.

Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch Theorem (GRR) Let X, Y be non-singular projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) ch( ) T d(x) ch( ) T d(y ) H (X; Q) H (Y ; Q)

WARNING!!! The horizontal arrows in the GRR commutative diagram K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) ch( ) T d(x) ch( ) T d(y ) are wrong-way (i.e. Gysin) maps. H (X; Q) H (Y ; Q) K 0 alg (X) = K alg 0 (X) f K alg 0 (Y ) = K 0 alg (Y ) H (X; Q) = H (X; Q) f H (Y ; Q) = H (Y ; Q) Poincaré duality Poincaré duality

K-homology is the dual theory to K-theory. How can K-homology be taken from algebraic geometry to topology? There are three ways in which this has been done: Homotopy Theory K-homology is the homology theory determined by the Bott spectrum. Geometric Cycles K-homology is the group of K-cycles. C* algebras K-homology is the Kasparov group KK (A, C).

Riemann-Roch for possibly singular complex projective algebraic varieties Let X be a (possibly singular) projective algebraic variety / C Then (Baum-Fulton-MacPherson) there are functorial maps α X : K 0 alg (X) K0 top(x) K-theory contravariant natural transformation of contravariant functors β X : K alg 0 (X) K top 0 (X) K-homology covariant natural transformation of covariant functors Everything is natural. No wrong-way (i.e. Gysin) maps are used.

α X : K 0 alg (X) K0 top(x) is the forgetful map which sends an algebraic vector bundle E to the underlying topological vector bundle of E. α X (E) := E topological

Let X, Y be projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) α X α Y K 0 top(x) K 0 top(y ) i.e. natural transformation of contravariant functors

Let X, Y be projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) α X α Y K 0 top(x) K 0 top(y ) ch ch H (X; Q) H (Y ; Q)

Let X, Y be projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 (Y ) β X β Y K top 0 (X) Ktop 0 (Y ) i.e. natural transformation of covariant functors

Let X, Y be projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) α X α Y K 0 top(x) K 0 top(y ) ch ch H (X; Q) H (Y ; Q)

Let X, Y be projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 (Y ) β X β Y K top 0 (X) Ktop 0 (Y ) ch ch H (X; Q) H (Y ; Q)