Planar auxeticity from various inclusions

Similar documents
Poisson s ratio of rectangular anti-chiral lattices with disorder

ANOMALOUS DEFORMATION OF CONSTRAINED AUXETIC SQUARE

548 Advances of Computational Mechanics in Australia

Analysis of the geometrical dependence of auxetic behavior in reentrant structures by finite elements

ENGN 2340 Final Project Report. Optimization of Mechanical Isotropy of Soft Network Material

Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering

Extreme Cosserat elastic cube structure with large magnitude of negative Poisson s ratio

Computer simulation of the Poisson's ratio of soft polydisperse discs at zero temperature

Three-dimensional stiff cellular structures with negative Poisson's ratio

Minimization of Poisson s ratio in anti-tetra-chiral two-phase structure

Example 3.7 Consider the undeformed configuration of a solid as shown in Figure 3.60.

FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH AND MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION OF VISCOELASTIC AUXETIC HONEYCOMB STRUCTURES FOR IMPACT MITIGATION

Mechanical Properties of Materials

Computational Modelling of Vibrations Transmission Loss of Auxetic Lattice Structure

arxiv: v1 [physics.comp-ph] 12 Apr 2015

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES, VIBRATION AND ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE OF AUXETIC CHIRAL CORE SANDWICH STRUCTURES

Computational Analysis for Composites

p s s On the auxetic properties of rotating rhombi and parallelograms: A preliminary investigation solidi physica status

Fracture mechanics fundamentals. Stress at a notch Stress at a crack Stress intensity factors Fracture mechanics based design

Forced Response of Plate with Viscoelastic Auxetic Dampers

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

The in-plane linear elastic constants and out-ofplane bending of 3-coordinated ligament and cylinder-ligament honeycombs.

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

Basic Equations of Elasticity

Fig. 1. Circular fiber and interphase between the fiber and the matrix.

UWE has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material.

Towards Efficient Finite Element Model Review Dr. Richard Witasse, Plaxis bv (based on the original presentation of Dr.

ICM11. Homogenization of periodic auxetic materials

Elements of Continuum Elasticity. David M. Parks Mechanics and Materials II February 25, 2004

Elasto Plastic 3D Finite Element Contact Analysis of a Hole Containing a Circular Insert in a Fatigue Test Coupon

DYNAMIC MODELING OF SPOT WELDS USING THIN LAYER INTERFACE THEORY

Cellular solid structures with unbounded thermal expansion. Roderic Lakes. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 15, (1996).

BECAS - an Open-Source Cross Section Analysis Tool

Elasticity in two dimensions 1

Plane and axisymmetric models in Mentat & MARC. Tutorial with some Background

Modelling and numerical simulation of the wrinkling evolution for thermo-mechanical loading cases

Measurement of deformation. Measurement of elastic force. Constitutive law. Finite element method

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Samantha Ramirez, MSE. Stress. The intensity of the internal force acting on a specific plane (area) passing through a point. F 2

Low Porosity Metallic Periodic Structures with Negative Poisson's Ratio

VIBRATION ENERGY FLOW IN WELDED CONNECTION OF PLATES. 1. Introduction

Alternative numerical method in continuum mechanics COMPUTATIONAL MULTISCALE. University of Liège Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering

Structural behaviour of traditional mortise-and-tenon timber joints

COMPRESSION AND BENDING STIFFNESS OF FIBER-REINFORCED ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS. Abstract. Introduction

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 12, December-2017 ISSN

Exercise: concepts from chapter 8

Macroscopic theory Rock as 'elastic continuum'

Lecture 8. Stress Strain in Multi-dimension

Module I: Two-dimensional linear elasticity. application notes and tutorial. Problems

Prediction of Elastic Constants on 3D Four-directional Braided

Constitutive models. Constitutive model: determines P in terms of deformation

Crack Tip Plastic Zone under Mode I Loading and the Non-singular T zz -stress

HPLP300 - Plate with Young modulus function of the temperature

International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology E-ISSN

IDENTIFICATION OF THE ELASTIC PROPERTIES ON COMPOSITE MATERIALS AS A FUNCTION OF TEMPERATURE

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

GLOBAL AND LOCAL LINEAR BUCKLING BEHAVIOR OF A CHIRAL CELLULAR STRUCTURE

Exercise: concepts from chapter 5

Modelling Anisotropic, Hyperelastic Materials in ABAQUS

1 332 Laboratories 1. 2 Computational Exercises 1 FEA of a Cantilever Beam... 1 Experimental Laboratory: Tensile Testing of Materials...

Advanced Structural Analysis EGF Section Properties and Bending

Finite Element Analysis of Dynamic Properties of Thermally Optimal Two-phase Composite Structure

Numerical Properties of Spherical and Cubical Representative Volume Elements with Different Boundary Conditions

TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS

A short review of continuum mechanics

VORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR MATERIALS

BENCHMARK LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE USING OPENSEES & COMPARISON WITH ANALYTICAL SOLUTION

ANALYTICAL PENDULUM METHOD USED TO PREDICT THE ROLLOVER BEHAVIOR OF A BODY STRUCTURE

EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 2 Stress & Strain - Axial Loading

Homogenization on Multi-Materials Elements: Application to Printed Circuit Boards and Warpage Analysis

Conservation of mass. Continuum Mechanics. Conservation of Momentum. Cauchy s Fundamental Postulate. # f body

Stress analysis of a stepped bar

ME 475 Modal Analysis of a Tapered Beam

Nomenclature. Length of the panel between the supports. Width of the panel between the supports/ width of the beam

A 3 D finite element model for sound transmission through a double plate system with isotropic elastic porous materials

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF SYNTACTIC FOAM CORE SANDWICH USING A MULTIPLE SCALES BASED ASYMPTOTIC METHOD

ENGINEERING TRIPOS PART IIA 3C7: EXPERIMENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS

Assessment of boundaryelement method for modelling the structural response of a pavement

Keywords: Re-entrant; cellular solid; Negative Poisson s ratio; Voronoi; Energy absorption; Compression

INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE ON BEHAVIOR OF THE INTERFACIAL CRACK BETWEEN THE TWO LAYERS

When materials are stretched in a particular direction, they

MECHANICS OF CHIRAL, ANTI-CHIRAL, AND HIERARCHICAL HONEYCOMBS

rsc.li/soft-matter-journal As featured in: Highlighting research from the University of Wisconsin Madison, and Technion.

Soft Bodies. Good approximation for hard ones. approximation breaks when objects break, or deform. Generalization: soft (deformable) bodies

INFLUENCE OF THE LOCATION AND CRACK ANGLE ON THE MAGNITUDE OF STRESS INTENSITY FACTORS MODE I AND II UNDER UNIAXIAL TENSION STRESSES

[5] Stress and Strain

Thermal stresses in hybrid materials with auxetic inclusions

ACCURATE MODELLING OF STRAIN DISCONTINUITIES IN BEAMS USING AN XFEM APPROACH

Comparison of Ply-wise Stress-Strain results for graphite/epoxy laminated plate subjected to in-plane normal loads using CLT and ANSYS ACP PrepPost

Module 3 : Equilibrium of rods and plates Lecture 15 : Torsion of rods. The Lecture Contains: Torsion of Rods. Torsional Energy

3-D Finite Element Analysis of Instrumented Indentation of Transversely Isotropic Materials

UNLOADING OF AN ELASTIC-PLASTIC LOADED SPHERICAL CONTACT

Fabrication and Testing of 2-Dimensional Z-Expandable Auxetic Textile. Structures for Impact Protective Clothing Applications

Game Physics. Game and Media Technology Master Program - Utrecht University. Dr. Nicolas Pronost

ABHELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Analytical Modeling of the Stress-Strain Distribution in a Multilayer Structure with Applied Bending

3D Elasticity Theory

Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. Preliminary Qualifying Examination Solid Mechanics February 25, 2002

Module 7: Micromechanics Lecture 34: Self Consistent, Mori -Tanaka and Halpin -Tsai Models. Introduction. The Lecture Contains. Self Consistent Method

Module 7: Micromechanics Lecture 29: Background of Concentric Cylinder Assemblage Model. Introduction. The Lecture Contains

Transcription:

Planar auxeticity from various inclusions Artur A. Poźniak 1 Krzysztof W. Wojciechowski 2 Joseph N. Grima 3 Luke Mizzi 4 1 Institute of Physics, Poznań Universty of Technology, Piotrowo 3, 6-695 Poznań 2 Institute of Molecular Physics PAS, M. Smoluchowskiego 17, 6-179 Poznań 3 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 28 4 Metamaterials Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 28 15 th September 215 AUXETICS 215 Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 1 / 23

Motivation What is an auxetic? ν < (Negtative Poisson s Ratio) is for mechanics what negative refractive index is for optics n <. Auxetics are metamaterials. Beneficial features from NPR Resistance to shape change and indentation; crack resistance; better vibration absorption (including acoustic one); synclastic curvature, different dynamics. Applications of NPR materials Medicine (stents, bandages, implants), defence (energy absorption), furniture industry (better mattresses indentation), automotive industry and sports (safety belts). Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 2 / 23

Poisson s ratio (stretching along x axis) W H Formal definition ν xy = ǫ yy ǫ xx = s yyxx s xxxx W H Engineering definition ν = H H W W Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 3 / 23

Motivation rotating units Grima, J. N., Alderson, A., & Evans, K. E. (25). Auxetic behaviour from rotating rigid units. Physica Status Solidi (B), 242(3), 561 575. Grima, J. N., Chetcuti, E., Manicaro, E., Attard, D., Camilleri, M., Gatt, R., & Evans, K. E. (211). On the auxetic properties of generic rotating rigid triangles. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 468(2139), 81 83. Grima, J., Zammit, V., Gatt, R., Alderson, A., & Evans, K. (27). Auxetic behaviour from rotating semi-rigid units. Physica Status Solidi (B), 244(3), 866 882. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 4 / 23

Motivation rotating units Grima, J. N., Alderson, A., & Evans, K. E. (25). Auxetic behaviour from rotating rigid units. Physica Status Solidi (B), 242(3), 561 575. Grima, J. N., Chetcuti, E., Manicaro, E., Attard, D., Camilleri, M., Gatt, R., & Evans, K. E. (211). On the auxetic properties of generic rotating rigid triangles. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 468(2139), 81 83. Grima, J., Zammit, V., Gatt, R., Alderson, A., & Evans, K. (27). Auxetic behaviour from rotating semi-rigid units. Physica Status Solidi (B), 244(3), 866 882. Our result from 21 Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 4 / 23

Motivation rotating units Grima, J. N., Alderson, A., & Evans, K. E. (25). Auxetic behaviour from rotating rigid units. Physica Status Solidi (B), 242(3), 561 575. Grima, J. N., Chetcuti, E., Manicaro, E., Attard, D., Camilleri, M., Gatt, R., & Evans, K. E. (211). On the auxetic properties of generic rotating rigid triangles. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 468(2139), 81 83. Grima, J., Zammit, V., Gatt, R., Alderson, A., & Evans, K. (27). Auxetic behaviour from rotating semi-rigid units. Physica Status Solidi (B), 244(3), 866 882. Our result from 21 Taylor, M., Francesconi, L., Gerendás, M., Shanian, A., Carson, C., & Bertoldi, K. (214). Advanced Materials, 26(15), 2365 7. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 4 / 23

Motivation rotating units Grima, J. N., Alderson, A., & Evans, K. E. (25). Auxetic behaviour from rotating rigid units. Physica Status Solidi (B), 242(3), 561 575. Grima, J. N., Chetcuti, E., Manicaro, E., Attard, D., Camilleri, M., Gatt, R., & Evans, K. E. (211). On the auxetic properties of generic rotating rigid triangles. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 468(2139), 81 83. Grima, J., Zammit, V., Gatt, R., Alderson, A., & Evans, K. (27). Auxetic behaviour from rotating semi-rigid units. Physica Status Solidi (B), 244(3), 866 882. Our result from 21 Taylor, M., Francesconi, L., Gerendás, M., Shanian, A., Carson, C., & Bertoldi, K. (214). Advanced Materials, 26(15), 2365 7. Why not fill the gaps? Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 4 / 23

Structures a) Geometry: Periodically arranged ellipses Alternating axes (perpendicular) b) Repeating unit cell (RUC): 4 rotating units Periodic mesh c) Boundary conditions within reduced RUC All boundaries remain straight lines Less computational resources needed Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 5 / 23

Simulations Finite Elements 1 Abaqus/CAE via Python interface generates inp files (wc -l ellipses-uniform-mesh.py gives 64 lines), 2 Abaqus/STANDARD performs simulations generating odb files, 3 Abaqus/CAE extracts important information from each odb file. One run is enough to calculate ν as well as E in one direction: V y the displacement of (an arbitrary) top node E elas elastic deformation energy T denotes the plane-stress thickness. U x known deformation ν eff = V y/h U x /W. (1) E eff = 2 Eelas W T U 2 x H. (2) Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 6 / 23

Meshes: uniform vs. non-uniform The discretization (meshing) is an essential and most challenging step on FE analysis. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 7 / 23

Meshes: uniform vs. non-uniform The discretization (meshing) is an essential and most challenging step on FE analysis. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 7 / 23

Mesh & convergence Figure: Nonuniform exemplary mesh. Each edge was assigned a bias seed in order to obtain possibly dense mesh in the narrowest (bottleneck) regions. In this case L gap/d min = 8 was chosen in order to make he figure readable. In the simulations this ratio was 1. Fig. on the right shows that the convergence tests were performed up to the value d min = 1 4 Figure: Convergence of Poisson s ratio as a function of d min at fixed d max =.1. Here ν matr = ν incl =.99, E matr = 1. The geometric parameters are: a =.9, b =.89. The convergence displays various characteristics depending on the value of E incl. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 8 / 23

Mesh & convergence Figure: Nonuniform exemplary mesh. Each edge was assigned a bias seed in order to obtain possibly dense mesh in the narrowest (bottleneck) regions. In this case L gap/d min = 8 was chosen in order to make he figure readable. In the simulations this ratio was 1. Fig. on the right shows that the convergence tests were performed up to the value d min = 1 4 Figure: Convergence of Poisson s ratio as a function of d min at fixed d max =.1. Here ν matr = ν incl =.99, E matr = 1. The geometric parameters are: a =.9, b =.89. The convergence displays various characteristics depending on the value of E incl. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 8 / 23

Convergence.6.4.2.2.4.6.8 5 1 2 5 1 2 4 8 1 4 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 1 61 6 E incl /E matr Figure: Convergence of ν eff and E eff /E matr as obtained within non-uniform meshing for a =.9, b =.89, ν incl = ν matr =.99 and increasing mesh density. The upper, monotonic curves refer to the right (Young s modulus, red) axis, while the non monotonic curves refer to the left (Poisson s ratio, blue) axis. The numbers in the legend stand for the L gap/d min ratio. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 9 / 23 Eeff/Ematr

Detailed convergence ν.45 1 5 4 3 2 1/ n l 1 5.5.55.6.65.7 E incl = 1 4 uniform mesh Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 1 / 23

Detailed convergence ν.45.5.55.6.65 1 5 4 3 2 E incl = 1 4 non-uniform mesh uniform mesh 1/ n l 1 5.7.5.1.15.2 d max PR PR.52.54.56.58.6.62.5.52.54.56.58..1.2.3.4.5 dmin..5.1.15.2.25.3.35 dmin PR.5.51.52.53.54..5.1.15 dmin PR.525.52.515.51.55.5.495..2.4.6.8.1.12 dmin Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 1 / 23

Detailed convergence ν.45.5.55.6.65 1 5 4 3 2 4 3 E incl = 1 4 non-uniform mesh uniform mesh 1/ n l 1 5.7.5.1.15.2 2 d max 1 PR PR.52.54.56.58.6.62.5.52.54.56.58 1..1.2.3.4.5 2 dmin..5.1.15.2.25.3.35 dmin PR.5.51.52.53 3.54..5.1.15 dmin PR.525.52.515.51.55.5 4.495..2.4.6.8.1.12 dmin Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 1 / 23

Detailed convergence E.75 1 5 4 3 2 1/n l 1 5.7 Eeff/Ematr.65.6.55 E incl = 1 4 non-uniform mesh uniform mesh.5.5.1.15.2 d max Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 11 / 23

Required time vs. nuber of FE layers UNIFORM N-UNIFORM, d max =.2 N-UNIFORM, d max =.1 N-UNIFORM, d max =.5 1 5 1 4 t [s] 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 4 6 1 2 32 64 128 L gap /d min or L gap /d u Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 12 / 23

Memory consumed vs. nuber of FE layers 1 9 UNIFORM N-UNIFORM, d max =.2 N-UNIFORM, d max =.1 N-UNIFORM, d max =.5 memory [MB] 1 7 1 5 1 3 1 1 2 4 6 1 2 32 64 128 L gap /d min or L gap /d u Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 13 / 23

Results Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 14 / 23

Results Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 14 / 23

Results Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 14 / 23

Results Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 14 / 23

Results Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 14 / 23

Results Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 15 / 23

E incl limits, anisotropy.2.2.4.6.8 L gap=.1 L gap=.2 L gap=.5 L gap=.1 L gap=.2.2.4.6.8 1 a/ b Void limit, E incl c) The dependence of Poisson s ratio as a function of a/b for various values of L gap. Here both ν matr and ν incl are equal. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 16 / 23

E incl limits, anisotropy.2.2.4.6.8 L gap=.1 L gap=.2 L gap=.5 L gap=.1 L gap=.2.2.4.6.8 1 a/ b Void limit, E incl.6.4.2.2.4.6 L gap =.1 L gap =.2 L gap =.5 L gap =.1 L gap =.2.2.4.6.8 1 a/b Rigid limit, E incl c) The dependence of Poisson s ratio as a function of a/b for various values of L gap. Here both ν matr and ν incl are equal. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 16 / 23

Rigid inclusions, f (L gap ).6.4.2.2.4.6.8 a/ b=.5 a/ b=.1 a/ b=.5 a/ b=.1 a/ b=.2 a/ b=.3 a/ b= 1..1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 L gap Figure: The dependence of Poisson s ratio as a function of L gap for various values of a/b within the rigid inclusion limit. Here both ν matr and ν incl are equal. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 17 / 23

Figure: The dependence of effective Poisson s ratio as a function of the matrix Poisson s ratio in the limit of infinitely hard inclusions (E incl ). The value of ν incl in this limit has no impact on the effective properties since the inclusions do not deform. The inset figure helps in estimating of the a/b ratio, for which ν eff changes sign. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 18 / 23 Rigid inclusions, f (ν matr ).1.5.5 a =.9,b =.89 a =.14,b =.84 a =.19,b =.79 a =.24,b =.74 a =.29,b =.69 a =.34,b =.64 a =.39,b =.59 a =.44,b =.54 a =.49,b =.49 E incl νmatr =.1.1.1.15.2.3.1 log(a/ b) 1..2.99.49.49 ν matr

Figure: Effective Poisson s ratio, ν eff, (blue colour) and effective Young s modulus, E eff /E matr, (red colour) as functions of E incl /E matr for strongly auxetic matrices and inclusions. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 19 / 23 More and more auxetic constituents.6.4.2.2.4.6.8 ν matr =.9,ν incl =.9 ν matr =.99,ν incl =.99 ν matr =.999,ν incl =.999 ν matr =.9999,ν incl =.9999 1 4 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 E incl /E matr Eeff/Ematr

Large deformations.2.4.6.8 % 5% 1% ε 15% 2% 1 4 7 2 5 8 3 6 9 Poisson s ratio Effective Poisson s ratio, ν eff, and effective Young s modulus, E eff /E matr as functions of nominal strain for ν matr = and void inclusions (the material of inclusions is entirely removed). The numbers in the legend correspond to the following geometry parameter pairs: 1) a =.9,.89, 2) a =.14,.84, 3) a =.19,.79, 4) a =.24,.74, 5) a =.29,.69, 6) a =.34,.64, 7) a =.39,.59, 8) a =.44,.54, 9) a =.49,.49. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 2 / 23

Large deformations.2.4.6.8 % 5% 1% ε 15% 2% 1 4 7 2 5 8 3 6 9 Poisson s ratio Eeff/Ematr 1 1 2 1 3 % 5% 1% ε 15% 2% 1 4 7 2 5 8 3 6 9 Young s modulus Effective Poisson s ratio, ν eff, and effective Young s modulus, E eff /E matr as functions of nominal strain for ν matr = and void inclusions (the material of inclusions is entirely removed). The numbers in the legend correspond to the following geometry parameter pairs: 1) a =.9,.89, 2) a =.14,.84, 3) a =.19,.79, 4) a =.24,.74, 5) a =.29,.69, 6) a =.34,.64, 7) a =.39,.59, 8) a =.44,.54, 9) a =.49,.49. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 2 / 23

Star-like inclusions, parameters a and b a =.5, b =.945 Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 21 / 23

Star-like inclusions, parameters a and b a =.5, b =.945 Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 21 / 23

Conclusions For strongly anisotropic inclusions the effective Poisson s ratio, which is close to for very low E incl /E matr, grows and after reaching a maximum (of negative value) decays to the matrix values close to E incl /E matr 1 and then grows again to the large E incl /E matr limit. void homogenous rigid Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 22 / 23

Conclusions For strongly anisotropic inclusions the effective Poisson s ratio, which is close to for very low E incl /E matr, grows and after reaching a maximum (of negative value) decays to the matrix values close to E incl /E matr 1 and then grows again to the large E incl /E matr limit. In the vicinity of E incl /E matr for which the effective PR shows its maximum, for the most auxetic inclusions the effective Young s modulus is essentially larger than for less auxetic inclusions. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 22 / 23

Conclusions For strongly anisotropic inclusions the effective Poisson s ratio, which is close to for very low E incl /E matr, grows and after reaching a maximum (of negative value) decays to the matrix values close to E incl /E matr 1 and then grows again to the large E incl /E matr limit. In the vicinity of E incl /E matr for which the effective PR shows its maximum, for the most auxetic inclusions the effective Young s modulus is essentially larger than for less auxetic inclusions. For highly anisotropic inclusions of very large Young s modulus, the effective PR of the composite can be negative for nonauxetic matrix and inclusions. These is a very simple example of an auxetic structure being not only entirely continuous, i.e. without empty regions (cuts, holes) introduced into the system, but with E incl E matr, i.e. inclusions (much) harder than the matrix..6.4.2.2.4.6 Lgap =.1 Lgap =.2 Lgap =.5 Lgap =.1 Lgap =.2.2.4.6.8 1 a/ b Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 22 / 23

The end Thank you for your attention This work was supported by the (Polish) National Centre for Science under the grant NCN 212/5/N/ST5/1476. Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 23 / 23

.6.4 1.8.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 1 2 1 4 6 14 1 16.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 1 14 1 16 6.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 1 6 14 1 16 Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 6 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 14 1 16 1 6 14 1 16 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 4 14 1 6 16 1 Eeffν/ eff Ematr Eeffν/ eff Ematr Eeffν/ eff Ematr Eeffν/ eff Ematr.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 2 1 6 1.2 1 2.4 1 4 1 6.4.2 1 1 6 14 1 16 1 2.6 1 4 1 2 1 4.2.4.8 1 6.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 1 4 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 1 16 1 6 1 4 1 2.8 1 2 1 4.4.2.2.4.6.8 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.8 1 6.2.4.6 1 4 14 1 1 6.4.2 6.6 4.4 1 1 1 1 4.2 1 2 1 2 1 2.6 1 2 1.2.4.8 1 6.2 1 6.2.4.8 1 4.6 1 4 1 6.8 1 6 1 1 2.4 1 4 1 4 1.4 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.2 1.2.4.2.4.2.2.4.6.8.4 1 1 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6.2.6 1 2 1 4 1 16 1 2.6 4.8 1 6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.4 1 1 2 1 4 14.2.6.6.2.4.4 1 6.8 1 6 1 2 1 1 4.8 1 6.2.4 1 2 1 4 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6.2 1.4.2.2.4.6.8.4 1.2.8 1 2 1 4 1 16.6 4 1 6 14 1 2.4 1 1 2.4 1 4 1 2 1 4.6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.2.8.6.2.4 1 1 2 6.8 1 6.8.2.4 1 1 4 1 6 1 6.2 1.4 1 1 2 1 4 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.4 1 2.2.4 1 4.8 1 6 1 16.4.2.2.4.6.8.6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.6 4.2.6 1 4.6.8 14 1 1 2 1 1 2.6.2.4.8.2.4 6.8 1 6.2 1 1 2 1 1 4.6 4 1 6.4 1.2.2.2 1 2.8 1 6.4.2.4.4 1.4 1 1 2 1 4 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 1 2 1 16.4.2.2.4.6.8.6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.6.2.2.4.6 4 14.8 1 6.4 1 1 2 1 4.2.4.6 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.2 1 2.6.2.4 1.2.4.8 1 6 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6 1 4.8 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 1 16 6 1 6 16.2 1 1 2 14 1 14 1 6.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 Planar auxeticity from various inclusions.4.2.4 1 2 1 4 1 1 2 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 1 6.8 1 2 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 1 16 6 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 6.2.4.6 14 1.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 4.4 1 4.8 1 2 1 4 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 6 16 1 6.2 1 6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.6.2 1 4 14 1 1 2.4 1.6.2.4 1 2 1.8 1 6 1 2 1 2 1 4.8 1 4 1 4.8 6.2 1 1 6.2.4 1 6.4.6 1 4.4.2.2.4.6.8.2.4.6 1 6 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6.2.8 1 1 6 1 6 16 1 2.4 1 1 2.6 1 4 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.2.4 1 2 1 4 1 6.6.8 14.6.2 1 1 2.8 1 6.4.2.4 1 1 1 4 1 2 1 2.8 1 4 1 4 1 6.4 1 4.2.8.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 6.6.4 1 1 2 1 4.4.2.2.4.6.8.2.2.4.6 1 6 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6.2.4.6.2.8 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 1 6 16.2 1 14.4 1 1 2.8 1 2.2.4.6 1 6.2.4 1.8 1 6.4 1 2.6 1 4 1 6.4 1 1 4.8 1 4.2 1 4.8 1 6.6 1 4.8.6 1 4.2 1 1 4.4.2.2.4.6.8.4.6 1 6 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6 1 2.6.2 1 2 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.8 1 1 2.4 1.2.4 1 6 16.2.2.4.6 1 2 14.4 1 6.8.2.2.4 1 4 1 6.4 1 1 2.8.2.2 1.2 1.6 1 4.8 1 6.4.2.4.2 1 2 1 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6 1 2.4 1.2.4 1 2 1 4 1 6.4 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.2.4 1 6 16.6 1 6.6 1 4.8 14.8.2 1 2 1 4.4 1.2.4.6 1 4.8.4.2 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6 1 1 2.6.2 1 1 2 1 6 16.2.4.8 1 6.4 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 1 4 14 1 2 1 4.2.2.4 1 2.8 1 6.4 1 1 4.8 1 6.4.2.2.4.6.8.6.2.2.4.6.4 1 2.8 1 6.4.2 1.2.4 1.4 1 4 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6 1 2 1 4.6.8 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 1 6 16.4.2.2.4.6.8.2 1 1 2 14 1.4.2.4 1 2 1 4 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6.4.2.2.4.6.8 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 1 6 16 1 1 2.6 1 4.8.2.4 1.2.4.6 1 4.2 1 1 2.2 1 1 2.8 1 6.4.2.2.4.6 1 6 1 6.4 1 1 4 14 1 2 1 4 1 2.8 1 6.4.2.2.4.6.8.2.4.6 1.2 1 1 4.8 1 6 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 6.4.2.2.4.6.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1.6 1 6.4 1 1 4.8 1 6.8 1 2.6 1 4.2 1.2.4 1 6.4.2.4.6 1 4 1.2.8 1 2 1 4.8 1 6.4 1 1 2 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.6 1 4.2.4.6 1 4.8.2 1 1 2.8.2.4.2.4.6 1 6.4 1 1 2.6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 1 4.2.4.6 1 4.8.2 1 1 2.8.2 1 1 2.4.2.4.6 1 6.4.2.4.6 1 4.8 1 6.4.2 1 2.6.2 1 6.4 1 1 4.8 1 2.6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 1 4.2 1.2.4.6.2.2.4.4.2 1 1 2.2 1 1 2.8 1 6.4.2.4.6 1 4.6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 1 2.8 1 6.4.2.4.6 1 4.8 1 6.4 1 2.2.4.6 1 4.2 1 1 2.8.4.4.2 1.2.4.6.8 1 6.4.2.4.8 1 6.2 1.2.4.6 1 4.4.2 1 1 2.6 1 4.6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.4.2.4.8 1 6.2 1.6 1 4.6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.4 1 2.6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.8.2 1.6 1 4.4 1 2.6.6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.2 1.4 1 2.6 νincl =.99 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.2.4.6.2.4 1 4 14 1 6 16 15 Sep 215 24 / 23

ν ν ν a=.9 b=.89, gwiazdki νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 a=.24 b=.74, gwiazdki νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 a=.39 b=.59, gwiazdki νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 ν ν ν a=.14 b=.84, gwiazdki νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 a=.29 b=.69, gwiazdki νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 a=.44 b=.55, gwiazdki νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 ν ν a=.19 b=.79, gwiazdki νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 a=.34 b=.64, gwiazdki νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49.6.4.6.4.6.4.2.2.2.2.4.2.4.2.4.6.6.6.8.8.8 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 14 16 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 14 16 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 14 16 νmat =.99 νmat =.49 νmat =. νmat =.49 νmat =.99 νmat =.49 νmat =. νmat =.49 νmat =.99 νmat =.49 νmat =. νmat =.49.6.4.6.4.6.4.2.2.2.2.4.2.4.2.4.6.6.6.8.8.8 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 14 16 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 14 16 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 14 16 νmat =.99 νmat =.49 νmat =. νmat =.49 νmat =.99 νmat =.49 νmat =. νmat =.49 νmat =.99 νmat =.49 νmat =. νmat =.49.6.4.6.4.6.4.2.2.2.2.4.6.2.4.6.8.8 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 14 16 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 14 16 νmat =.99 νmat =.49 νmat =. νmat =.49.2.4.6.8 1 8 1 6 1 4 1 2 1 14 16 νmat =.99 νmat =.49 νmat =. νmat =.49 ν a=.49 b=.49, gwiazdki νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νincl =.999 νincl =.99 νincl =.9 νincl =.49 νincl =. νincl =.49 νmat =.99 νmat =.49 νmat =. νmat =.49 Poźniak, Wojciechowski, Grima, Mizzi Planar auxeticity from various inclusions 15 Sep 215 25 / 23