Recent results from MINERvA

Similar documents
The MINERnA Experiment

Charged Current Inclusive Scattering in MINERnA

Big Data, Big networks, Better Scientific Collaborations. Julián Félix.

Neutrinos Induced Pion Production in MINERvA

Neutrino cross sections with the MINERnA Experiment. Steven Manly, University of Rochester NOW 2010, Conca Specchiulla, Italy September 4-11, 2010

MINERvA - Neutrino-nucleus cross sections are important!

Charged Current Quasielastic Analysis from MINERνA

NEUTRINO INTERACTIONS AT MINERvA. Kevin McFarland University of Rochester QMUL Seminar 14 January 2014

Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at MINERvA

Quasi-Elastic Scattering in MINERvA

Quasi-Elastic Cross Sections Pittsburgh Neutrino Flux Workshop

Neutrino Nucleus Deep Inelastic Scattering at MINERvA

Neutrino cross sections for future oscillation experiments

On the measurements of neutrino energy spectra and nuclear effects in neutrino-nucleus interactions

MINOS experiment at Fermilab

Measurements of the lead-hydrocarbon cross section ratio for charged-current neutrino interactions

Neutrino Energy Reconstruction Methods Using Electron Scattering Data. Afroditi Papadopoulou Pre-conference, EINN /29/17

Measurement of the Inclusive Neutrino Charged-Current Interaction Double Differential Cross Sections with the MINERνA Detector

Neutrino Shadow Play Neutrino interactions for oscillation measurements

Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions and Oscillations

Neutrino interaction at K2K

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

Neutrino Cross Sections for (Future) Oscillation Experiments. Pittsburgh Flux Workshop December 7, 2012 Deborah Harris Fermilab

Neutrino Interaction Physics for Oscillation Analyses

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

Looking Forward to the Future QE* Needs of Oscillation Experiments

ω γ Neutral Current Single Photon Production (NCγ) Outline 1. Oscillation physics 2. NOMAD 3. T2K/MINERvA 4. MicroBooNE 5. MiniBooNE+ 6.

Neutrino Cross Sections and Scattering Physics

Neutrino Cross Section Measurements for Long-Baseline Acceleratorbased Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

Status of Neutrino Cross Sections

Status of experimental neutrino-nucleus scattering at a few GeV

Long Baseline Neutrinos

Neutrino Physics at Short Baseline

K2K and T2K experiments

Explorations of Neutrino Flux from the NuMI Beam at Different Positions From the Beam Axis

QE or not QE, that is the question

MINOS Oscillation Results from The First Year of NuMI Beam Operation

Introduction to Neutrino Interaction Physics NUFACT08 Summer School June 2008 Benasque, Spain Paul Soler

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

CCQE and SciBooNE, T2K. 12/3/2013 K Mahn, INT

Neutrino Scattering Results from MiniBooNE and SciBooNE

Why understanding neutrino interactions is important for oscillation physics

Single π production in MiniBooNE and K2K

arxiv: v2 [hep-ex] 1 Jan 2018

Latest results from MINOS

Charged current single pion to quasi-elastic cross section ratio in MiniBooNE. Steven Linden PAVI09 25 June 2009

Jan T. Sobczyk. (in collaboration with K. Niewczas, T. Golan, C. Juszczak) (many discussions with Rik Gran) INT Workshop, March 5, 2018

First MINOS Results from the NuMI Beam

The Study of ν-nucleus Scattering Physics Interplay of Cross sections and Nuclear Effects

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

High-energy neutrino interactions: first cross section measurements at TeV and above

HADRON PRODUCTION IN WROCŁAW NEUTRINO EVENT GENERATOR

arxiv: v5 [hep-ex] 28 Jul 2016

Sam Zeller Fermilab. PANIC 2011 July 26, 2011

Tina Leitner Oliver Buß, Ulrich Mosel und Luis Alvarez-Ruso

Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions. Ulrich Mosel

GENIE models and global fits of neutrino scattering data

Using Neutrinos as a Probe of the Strong Interaction

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 7 Sep 2009

PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF NEUTRINO INTERACTIONS STUDY USING GENIE EVENT GENERATOR *

The US Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) experiments

How I learned to stop worrying and love multi-nucleon effects (in neutrino-carbon interactions)

Sensitivity of the DUNE Experiment to CP Violation. Lisa Whitehead Koerner University of Houston for the DUNE Collaboration

Detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 10 Apr 2018

Hadronization model. Teppei Katori Queen Mary University of London CETUP neutrino interaction workshop, Rapid City, SD, USA, July 28, 2014

The NuMI Off-axis ν e Appearance Experiment (NOνA)

Model independent extraction of the axial mass parameter in CCQE anti neutrino-nucleon scattering

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

Accelerator neutrino experiments

Neutrino Oscillation Results from MINOS

Latest Results from the OPERA Experiment (and new Charge Reconstruction)

Neutron Structure Function from BoNuS

The Multiple Muon Charge Ratio in MINOS Far Detector

Conventional neutrino experiments

MINOS Neutrino Flux. Using NuMI Muon Monitors for calculating flux for use in cross-section calculations. D. Jason Koskinen

MiniBooNE Progress and Little Muon Counter Overview

Long Baseline Neutrino Experiments

Hadron Production Experiments and Neutrino Beams

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

Neutrino interaction systematic errors in MINOS and NOvA

Ulrich Mosel TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAAAA

The Short Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab

MINOS. Physics Program and Construction Status. Karol Lang The University of Texas at Austin. YITP: Neutrinos and Implications for Physics Beyond

MINERvA Flux: Executive Summary

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 30 Nov 2009

Challenges in ν-argon scattering and new results from the MicroBooNE experiment

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 16 Jul 2018

A method for detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Results and Status from HARP and MIPP

Particle Identification Algorithms for the Medium Energy ( GeV) MINERνA Test Beam Experiment

DIS/Hadronization. Jarek Nowak

Recent results from MiniBooNE on neutrino oscillations

Neutrino Physics at MiniBooNE

Neutrinos & the MINOS Experiment

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

Searching for Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Accelerator ν Experiments W.C Louis, LANL. MiniBooNE Status FNAL ORNL

Transcription:

Recent results from MINERvA Jonathan Miller for the MINERvA Collaboration Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria 1 PANIC NOW

Outline Introduction to MINERvA Recent important results: charged pion production coherent pion production inclusive charged current scattering quasielastic scattering arxiv:135.43 and arxiv: 135.34 Conclusions and Future

MINERνA" MINERvA Collaboration More than just a detector " MINERνA" Located underground at Fermilab, ~8"collaborators"from"par?cle"and"nuclear"physics"" near Chicago USA. University of Athens Otterbein University More than just a detector " University of Texas at Austin Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas University of Pittsburgh Institutions from 9 countries Fermilab University of Rochester University of Florida Rutgers University ~8"collaborators"from"par?cle"and"nuclear"physics"" Université de Genève Tufts University with over 6 collaborators. Universidad de Guanajuato University of California at Irvine University Hampton of Athens University Otterbein University University of Minnesota at Duluth University Inst. of Texas at Austin Pontificia Universidad Catolica delnacional Peru Nucl. Reas. Moscow Universidad de Ingeniería Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas University of Pittsburgh Mass. Col. Lib. Arts Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María Fermilab University of Rochester Northwestern University University of Florida Rutgers University William and Mary Université University de Genève of Chicago Tufts University Universidad de Guanajuato University of California at Irvine Hampton University University of Minnesota at Duluth Inst. Nucl. Reas. Moscow Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería Mass. Col. Lib. Arts Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María Northwestern University William and Mary University of Chicago David"Schmitz,"UChicago" Fermilab"Joint"Experimental=Theore?cal"Seminar"="May"1,"13" 3 5"

NuMI Beam figure courtesy Z. Pavlović 1 GeV/c protons from Main Injector. Graphite target ME run started September 13. 4

Backup

MINERvA Detector 1 modules for tracking and colorimetry (3k readout channels) Completion in Spring 1,. The MINOS near detector serves as a muon spectrometer. Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A743 (14) 13 6

Neutrino Event Generator (GENIE) Includes a lot of physics: electron scattering, final state interaction (FSI) models, and nuclear physics models Provides framework for realising physics analysis for neutrino (especially oscillation) experiments TK NOvA, IceCube, MINERvA D. Schmitz Events/.1 GeV Ratio to no oscillations 16 14 1 1 8 6 4 DATA ν µ +ν µ CCQE ν µ +ν µ CC nonqe ν e +ν e CC NC 1 3 4 5 1.5 MC Bestfit 1.5 1 3 4 > 5 Reconstructed ν Energy (GeV) arxiv:143.153 and Patrick de Perio s talk Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 18181, 14 7 σ cm / per nucleus 1 18 16 14 1 1 8 6 4 39 ν µ + A µ MINERvA <A> =1 1 SciBooNE <A> =1 KK <A> =1 3 TK <A> =1 4 BEBC <A> = 5 CHARM II <A> =1 6 SKAT <A> 3 7 ArgoNeuT <A> =4 9 GENIE v.6. + π + + A 1 1 Neutrino Energy (GeV) σ cm / per nucleus 1 18 16 14 1 1 8 6 4 39 ν + A µ + µ + π MINERvA <A> =1 8 BEBC 5 CHARM 6 SKAT <A> = II <A> =1 <A> =3 7 ArgoNeuT 9 GENIE v.6. <A> =4 + A 1 1 Neutrino Energy (GeV)

Publication forthcoming on arxiv:146.6415 Results: Charged Pion Production µ µ 3.4e POT neutrinos W p(n) p(n) 8

Event selection Events 15 3 1 5 3.5e+ POT ν µ + A µ + π + + A Coh Pion Pion Proton Other Events 6 5 4 1 3.1e+ POT + π + A µ + ν µ + A Coh Pion Pion Proton Other 1 3 5 1.1..3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 Proton Score.1..3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 Proton Score Events contain one muon matched in MINOS. Events contain at least one hadron track. Only tracks which stop in the Ecal or tracker region are accepted. Pions are identified by de/dx, and the existence of a Michel electron at the end of the pion track. 9

MC scaled by.7 Results n pions 1 pion 1 pion 1

Take away Measurements constrains interaction rate and final state interactions in pion production. The contribution from Final State Interaction (FSI) is significant. Needed to improve signal and background predictions for oscillation experiments. Agreement with GENIE. 11

Publication forthcoming Results: Coherent Pion Production 3.4e POT neutrinos.1e POT antineutrinos (_ ) ν μ q t W +_ μ +_ π +_ Existence of pion and muon with no nucleon breakup (quiet vertex) and low momentum transferred between nucleus and pion. A A 1

Event selection Events /.5 (GeV/c) Events /.5 (GeV/c) 7 DATA 6 5 4 3 1 7 6 5 4 3 1 antineutrino ν µ.1e+ POT.1..3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 Reconstructed t = (qp ) (GeV/c) ν µ + A µ + + π + A µ + + π.1e+ POT π COH QE RES W<1.4 1.4<W<. W>. Other All Background Tuned Reconstructed t = (qp ) π + A + A Monte Carlo Tuned Bkgd.1..3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 (GeV/c) Events have almost no vertex energy. Separation of coherent scattering from incoherent background by slope of t due to the slope being different for diffractive and resonant processes. Sideband is selected as the incoherent background, is tuned to MC to minimize χ 13 Events /.5 (GeV/c) Events /.5 (GeV/c) 1.8.6.4. 1 3 ν µ 3.5e+ POT + A µ + π + + A.1..3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 Reconstructed t = (qp ) (GeV/c) 1 1. 1.8.6.4. 3 neutrino ν µ 3.5e+ POT Reconstructed t = (qp ) π + A µ π DATA COH QE RES W<1.4 1.4<W<. W>. Other All Background Tuned + π + + A Monte Carlo Tuned Bkgd.1..3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 (GeV/c)

Results: Cross section antineutrino ) 1 /Degree/C (cm dσ dθ π. 1.15.1.5 39 ν µ θ π + A µ + + π + A.1e+ POT DATA GENIE v.6. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 w/r to Beam (Degrees) ) 1 /C σ (cm 5 15 1 5 39 1 ν + A µ + µ + π + A.1e+ POT DATA GENIE v.6. 4 6 8 1 1 14 16 18 Neutrino Energy (GeV) ) 1 /GeV/C (cm dσ de π 4.5 4 3.5 3.5 1.5 1.5 39 1 ν µ + A µ + + π + A.5 1 1.5.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Pion Energy (GeV).1e+ POT DATA GENIE v.6. ) 1 /Degree/C neutrino (cm dσ dθ π. 1.15.1.5 39 ν µ 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 θ π + A µ + π + + A 3.5e+ POT DATA GENIE v.6. w/r to Beam (Degrees) ) 1 /C σ (cm 5 15 1 5 39 1 ν + π + µ + A µ + A 3.5e+ POT DATA GENIE v.6. 4 6 8 1 1 14 16 18 Neutrino Energy (GeV) ) 1 /GeV/C (cm dσ de π 4.5 4 3.5 3.5 1.5 1.5 39 1 ν µ + A µ + π + + A.5 1 1.5.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Pion Energy (GeV) 3.5e+ POT DATA GENIE v.6. 14

Take away shows a harder and more forward pion distribution than GENIE. The selection of low t events allows a model independent measurement of coherent pion production. Can be used to set systematic for oscillation experiments. In the NuMI ME configuration, multiple passive targets (Pb, Fe, C) will allow a measurement of A dependence. 15

Published arxiv:143.13 Results: Inclusive Charged Current (GeV/c) Reconstructed Q 1 1 1 1 W = GeV W = 1.3 GeV 1 1 1 Reconstructed Bjorken x Scattering 8 7 6 5 4 3 1.94e POT neutrinos 16

Event Selection Events must have a muon in MINOS. Target vertex must be in passive target or neighbouring scintillator. Neutrino energy between and GeV. Muon angle < 17 deg. 17 1 Pb / 1 Fe 66kg / 33kg Target N Events / Module 3 C / 1 Fe / 1 Pb 166kg / 169kg / 11kg 14 1 1 8 6 4 1 3 True Event Origins Reconstructed Vertex Z Each Bunch AreaNormalized Target 3 Target 4 Target 5.3 Pb 8kg Carbon Iron Lead Scintillator 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 Adjusted Vertex Z (cm).5 Fe /.5 Pb 161kg/ 135kg Gives MINOS acceptance (restricts kinematics). Gives estimate of contamination from scientillator.

Ratio Results / σ CH 1.5 1.4 1.3 1. 1.1 Ratio of σ C : σ CH χ /ndf = 11.31/8 = 1.41 Simulation σ C / σ CH σ Fe / σ CH σ Pb 1..9.8.7 4 6 8 1 1 14 16 18 1.5 1.4 1.3 1. 1.1 1..9.8 Neutrino Energy (GeV) Ratio of σ Fe : σ CH χ /ndf = 9.76/8 = 1..7 4 6 8 1 1 14 16 18 1.5 1.4 1.3 1. 1.1 1. Neutrino Energy (GeV) Ratio of σ Pb : σ CH χ /ndf = 5.3/8 =.63 Simulation Simulation No tension between data and MC dσ CH dx /. 1.8 1.6 1.4 χ /ndf = 6.5/6 = 1.1 Simulation Ratio of dσ C dx : dσ CH dx Tension between data and MC dσ C dx dσ CH dx / dσ Fe dx dσ CH dx / dσ Pb dx 1. 1..8. 1.8 1.6 1.4 1. 1..8. 1.8 1.6 1.4 1....4.6.8 1. 1. 1.4 Reconstructed Bjorken x Ratio of dσ Fe : dσ CH dx dx χ /ndf = 5.87/6 = 4.31 Simulation...4.6.8 1. 1. 1.4 Reconstructed Bjorken x Simulation Ratio of dσ Pb dx χ /ndf = 58.46/6 = 9.74 : dσ CH dx.9.8.7 4 6 8 1 1 14 16 18 Neutrino Energy (GeV) 18 1..8...4.6.8 1. 1. 1.4 Reconstructed Bjorken x

Take away This is not deep inelastic scattering. Theory input needed! is not reproduced by simulation. (GeV/c) Reconstructed Q 1 1 1 1 W = GeV W = 1.3 GeV 1 1 1 Reconstructed Bjorken x 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 Can be used to improve estimate of systematic for oscillation experiments. Unexpected excess at high x and deficit at low x points to improvements needed in models ( fermi motion +? and shadowing). 19

Published in PRL and arxiv: 135.43 and arxiv: 135.34 Results:QuasiElastic Scattering p(n) n(p) 3.98e POT neutrinos W 1.7e POT antineutrinos µ µ

Event Selection, Results and Take away Simple event selection requires single track with matching track in MINOS. Requires no more than 1() additional blobs for antiν(ν) Basic relativistic fermi gas model disfavored. Increasing axial mass disfavored.

Conclusions and Future MINERvA is important in developing neutrino generators (GENIE), required for oscillation experiments. MINERvA ME data run has begun. Possibilities to extend the MINERvA program. Many analyses in progress, expect CCPi, K production, NuE elastic in the coming months. Some results show broad agreement with model predictions and others significant disagreement. No need to PANIC, NOW we have observation.