TIGGE at ECMWF. David Richardson, Head, Meteorological Operations Section Slide 1. Slide 1

Similar documents
Introduction to TIGGE and GIFS. Richard Swinbank, with thanks to members of GIFS-TIGGE WG & THORPEX IPO

Probabilistic Weather Forecasting and the EPS at ECMWF

The ECMWF Extended range forecasts

4.3.2 Configuration. 4.3 Ensemble Prediction System Introduction

ECMWF products to represent, quantify and communicate forecast uncertainty

The benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting

GIFS-TIGGE working group Report to ICSC. Richard Swinbank Masayuki Kyouda with thanks to other members of GIFS-TIGGE WG and the THORPEX IPO

Sub-seasonal predictions at ECMWF and links with international programmes

Clustering Techniques and their applications at ECMWF

Stochastic methods for representing atmospheric model uncertainties in ECMWF's IFS model

GPC Exeter forecast for winter Crown copyright Met Office

How far in advance can we forecast cold/heat spells?

Sub-seasonal predictions at ECMWF and links with international programmes

TC/PR/RB Lecture 3 - Simulation of Random Model Errors

MJO prediction Intercomparison using the S2S Database Frédéric Vitart (ECMWF)

A review on recent progresses of THORPEX activities in JMA

Model error and seasonal forecasting

Verification statistics and evaluations of ECMWF forecasts in

TIGGE-LAM archive development in the frame of GEOWOW. Richard Mladek (ECMWF)

An extended re-forecast set for ECMWF system 4. in the context of EUROSIP

Recent Developments of JMA Operational NWP Systems and WGNE Intercomparison of Tropical Cyclone Track Forecast

25 years of ensemble forecasting at ECMWF

Upgrade of JMA s Typhoon Ensemble Prediction System

Sub-seasonal to seasonal forecast Verification. Frédéric Vitart and Laura Ferranti. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts

Fernando Prates. Evaluation Section. Slide 1

Current JMA ensemble-based tools for tropical cyclone forecasters

Have a better understanding of the Tropical Cyclone Products generated at ECMWF

Recent Developments in Climate Information Services at JMA. Koichi Kurihara Climate Prediction Division, Japan Meteorological Agency

Current status and future developments of the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System

S e a s o n a l F o r e c a s t i n g f o r t h e E u r o p e a n e n e r g y s e c t o r

How ECMWF has addressed requests from the data users

Precipitation verification. Thanks to CMC, CPTEC, DWD, ECMWF, JMA, MF, NCEP, NRL, RHMC, UKMO

The new ECMWF seasonal forecast system (system 4)

Seasonal forecast from System 4

Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007

Recent activities related to EPS (operational aspects)

ACCESS AGREPS Ensemble Prediction System

Medium-range Ensemble Forecasts at the Met Office

MSC, BMRC, KMA,CMA, CPTEC, SAWS

Convective-scale NWP for Singapore

Ensemble forecasting. David Richardson. Head of Evaluation, Forecast Department, ECMWF. ECMWF February 15, 2017

Exploring and extending the limits of weather predictability? Antje Weisheimer

Activities of Numerical Weather Prediction for Typhoon forecast at Japan Meteorological Agency

Recent advances in Tropical Cyclone prediction using ensembles

LAM EPS and TIGGE LAM. Tiziana Paccagnella ARPA-SIMC

Quarterly numerical weather prediction model performance summaries April to June 2010 and July to September 2010

The WWRP Polar Prediction Project

Model error and parameter estimation

NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE. On Ensemble Prediction Using Singular Vectors Started from Forecasts

Approaches to ensemble prediction: the TIGGE ensembles (EC/TC/PR/RB-L3)

Report of GIFS-TIGGE WG (Submitted by Richard Swinbank and Masayuki Kyouda)

NW Pacific Tropical Cyclone Ensemble Forecast Project

Approaches to ensemble prediction: the TIGGE ensembles (EC/TC/PR/RB-L2)

Comparison of a 51-member low-resolution (T L 399L62) ensemble with a 6-member high-resolution (T L 799L91) lagged-forecast ensemble

Verification at JMA on Ensemble Prediction

The forecast skill horizon

ECMWF Forecasting System Research and Development

Current Issues and Challenges in Ensemble Forecasting

SPECIAL PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT

eccharts Ensemble data and recent updates Cihan Sahin, Sylvie Lamy-Thepaut, Baudouin Raoult Web development team, ECMWF

Five years of limited-area ensemble activities at ARPA-SIM: the COSMO-LEPS system

Experiments of clustering for central European area specially in extreme weather situations. István Ihász. Hungarian Meteorological Service

Recent ECMWF Developments

Probabilistic predictions of monsoon rainfall with the ECMWF Monthly and Seasonal Forecast Systems

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

Diagnostics of the prediction and maintenance of Euro-Atlantic blocking

MOGREPS Met Office Global and Regional Ensemble Prediction System

Ensemble Prediction Systems

Recent Data Assimilation Activities at Environment Canada

Tropical Intra-Seasonal Oscillations in the DEMETER Multi-Model System

The TIGGE global, medium-range ensembles

New initiatives for Severe Weather prediction at ECMWF

Clustering Forecast System for Southern Africa SWFDP. Stephanie Landman Susanna Hopsch RES-PST-SASAS2014-LAN

The Hungarian Meteorological Service has made

Diagnostics of forecasts for polar regions

Developing Operational MME Forecasts for Subseasonal Timescales

ECMWF: Weather and Climate Dynamical Forecasts

Shaping future approaches to evaluating highimpact weather forecasts

István Ihász, Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest, Hungary

Global climate predictions: forecast drift and bias adjustment issues

Ensemble of Data Assimilations methods for the initialization of EPS

ECMWF Medium-Range Forecast Graphical Products

Regional Production Quarterly report on the daily analyses and forecasts activities, and verification of the ENSEMBLE performances

Towards the Seamless Prediction of Weather and Climate

World Weather Research Program: a ten years vision. PM Ruti, F Vitart, S Majumdar IWTC VIII Dec Jeju

Science Objectives contained in three categories

ECMWF product development

Hydrologic Ensemble Prediction: Challenges and Opportunities

Latest thoughts on stochastic kinetic energy backscatter - good and bad

Main characteristics and performance of COSMO LEPS

Portugal. Instituto de Meteorologia

Tropical cyclone track forecasts using JMA model with ECMWF and JMA initial conditions

North Western Pacific Tropical Cyclone (Track) Ensemble Forecast Research Project (NW Pacific TC Project)

Behind the Climate Prediction Center s Extended and Long Range Outlooks Mike Halpert, Deputy Director Climate Prediction Center / NCEP

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

The Canadian approach to ensemble prediction

Severe weather warnings at the Hungarian Meteorological Service: Developments and progress

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

Tokyo Climate Center s activities as RCC Tokyo

Transcription:

TIGGE at ECMWF David Richardson, Head, Meteorological Operations Section david.richardson@ecmwf.int Slide 1 Slide 1

ECMWF TIGGE archive The TIGGE database now contains five years of global EPS data Holds more than 520 terabytes (2.6 billion fields). There are around 1300 registered users of the TIGGE data portal Slide 2 Slide 2

ECMWF TIGGE archive 80 Number of active users 70 60 50 40 Series1 30 20 10 0 Slide 3 Slide 3

ECMWF TIGGE archive 30000 Retrieved Data volumes (GBytes) 25000 Delivered 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Slide 4 Slide 4

ECMWF TIGGE archive - changes BoM, KMA stopped providing EPS to TIGGE archive KMA now testing sending higher resolution EPS New data: JMA 00 UTC control step 0 (as analysis) CMA analysis (06, 18)?? problem with database for 1 week needed to ask centres to resend. All gaps filled. Thanks to all who did that Access new batch access to TIGGE archive (python, perl) next generation data portal under development Planned GEOWOW developments: timeseries for small number of fields TIGGE-LAM, netcdf Slide 5 Slide 5

GEOWOW (GEOSS interoperability for Weather, Ocean and Water) is an EU-funded FP7 project that will begin in September 2011. GEOWOW will propose and validate a multi-disciplinary, distributed architectural model federating Earth Observation and other Earth Science data holdings and put this model forward as the European contribution to the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) Slide 6Common Infrastructure. Slide 6

GEOWOW The GEO Capacity Building Strategy focuses on three elements: human, institutional and infrastructure. The Weather component of the GEOWOW project will address all three by improving the access to THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) data and developing and demonstrating products using this data in collaboration with users in developing countries, including providing education and training. GEOWOW will significantly enhance the accessibility of the TIGGE archive at ECMWF for the wider user community, in particular the ability to efficiently access long time series of forecast data at user-specified locations. Slide 7 Slide 7

GEOWOW 3 years: September 2011 August 2014 Co-ordinated by ESA Total funding from EU: 7 M euros For weather: 1.1 M euros ECMWF Met Office Météo-France Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Slide 8 Slide 8

The operational forecast system High resolution deterministic forecast: twice per day 16 km 91-level, to 10 days ahead Ensemble forecast (EPS): twice daily 51 members, 32/65 km 62-level, to 15 days ahead extended to 32 days once a week (Monthly forecast) Ocean waves: twice daily Global: 10 days ahead at 28 km Limited Area Wave (LAW): 5 days ahead at 10 km Ensemble: 15 days ahead at 55 km Seasonal forecast: once a month 41-members, 125 km 62 levels, to 7 months ahead a sub-set ensemble of 11 members is run for 13 months every quarter Slide 9 Slide 9

The operational ECMWF EPS The operational version of the EPS includes 51 forecasts with resolution: T L 639L62 (~32km, 62 levels) from day 0 to 10, T L 319L62 (~64km, 62 levels) from day 10 to 15 (32 at 00UTC on Thursdays). Initial uncertainties are simulated by adding to the unperturbed analyses a combination of T42L62 singular vectors, computed to optimize total energy growth over a 48h time interval (OTI), and perturbations generated using the new ECMWF Ensemble Data Assimilation (EDA) system. Model uncertainties are simulated by adding stochastic perturbations to the tendencies due to parameterized physical processes (SPPT scheme) and using a stochastic backscatter (SPBS) scheme. The EPS is run twice a day, at 00 and 12 UTC; the 00 UTC run is fully coupled to the HOPE ocean model after day 10. Slide 10 NH SH TR Definition of the perturbed ICs 1 2 50 51.. Products

Summary of EPS changes Initial perturbations: 2009 : Combination of Singular Vectors (SVs) optimised in two 48-hour windows: [t0, t0+48h] and [t0-48h, t0] 2011 : Combination of EDA perturbations (diff. between 10 EDA analyses) and SVs optimised in the [t0, t0+48h] window with reduced (50%) amplitude Simulation of model uncertainty: 2009 : SPPT with 1 spatial scale, white-noise time variab. with 6-hour time scale 2011 : SPPT with 3 spatial and time scales, red-noise variability in time (Markov chain), plus stochastic backscatter (SPBS) Slide 11

Simulation of initial uncertainty using EDA Since 22 June 2010, differences between 6h perturbed forecasts from the ECMWF Ensemble Data Assimilation system have been combined with singular vectors to generate the EPS initial perturbations The ten T L 399L91 EDA perturbed analyses are generated by randomly perturbing the observations and the SST, and by running the forecast model with the SPPT stochastic scheme. The random perturbations are defined by sampling a normal distribution with the observation error standard deviation U850 background error standard deviation Randomization method (ope, left) EDA (cy36r4, right) Since 18 May 2011, the EDA has been used to specify the background errors of the day in the highresolution 4D-Var Slide 12

Simulation of model uncertainty: multiscale SPPT Since Oct 1998, the EPS has included a stochastic scheme designed to simulate random model errors due to parameterized physical processes (SPPT). 500 km 6 h 1000 km 3 d 2000 km 30 d Since Nov 2010, the scheme includes a multi-scale pattern generator to account for parameterization errors on multiple spatial and temporal scales. Slide 13 (from M Leutbecher)

Simulation of model uncertainty: SPBS Since Nov 2010, a stochastic backscatter scheme (SPBS) is also used in the EPS: Rationale: a fraction of the dissipated energy is backscattered upscale and acts as streamfunction forcing for the resolved-scale flow (Shutts & Palmer 2004, Shutts 2005, Berner et al 2009) Streamfunction forcing is given by: Streamfunction forcing Backscatter ratio Total dissipation rate Pattern generator Recent improvements/updates include: Revised convective dissipation calculation Revised dissipation rate smoothing Slide 14 Changed pressure dependency of vertical correlations Option to force only part of the spectrum [reduces computational cost and avoids problems detected with small scale forcing]

Recent operational changes 2010-2011 24 June 2010 (cycle 36r2) includes Changes to EPS initial-time perturbations 9 November 2010 (cycle 36r4) includes New cloud scheme New surface analysis schemes are introduced for snow and soil moisture EPS: revised model uncertainty; retuned initial perturbation amplitudes 18 May 2011 (cycle 37r2) includes Data assimilation changes Technical change: model-level data in GRIB-2 format Slide 15 Slide 15

EPS probability skill, RPSS, T850, N hem ECMWF EPS verification temperature 850hPa Ranked probability skill score \HG 0.8\(12mMA = 12 months moving average) N Hem Extratrop (lat 20.0 to 90.0, lon -180.0 to 180.0) 00UTC,12UTC,beginning 0.8 T+72 12hMA T+168 T+120 T+72 T+168 12hMA T+120 12hMA 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0-0.1-0.2-0.3 Slide 16 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Monthly score and 12-month running mean (bold) of Ranked Probability Skill Score for EPS forecasts of T850 at day 3 (blue), 5 (red) and 7 (black) for N hem Slide 16

EPS probability skill, RPSS, T850, Europe ECMWF EPS verification temperature 850hPa Ranked probability skill score \HG 0.8\(12mMA = 12 months moving average) Europe (lat 35.0 to 75.0, lon -12.5 to 42.5) 00UTC,12UTC,beginning 0.9 T+72 12hMA T+168 T+120 T+72 T+168 12hMA T+120 12hMA 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0-0.1 Slide 17 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Monthly score and 12-month running mean (bold) of Ranked Probability Skill Score for EPS forecasts of T850 at day 3 (blue), 5 (red) and 7 (black) for Europe Slide 17

EPS skill T850 NH 850hPa temperature Continuous ranked probability skill score N Hem Extratrop (lat 20.0 to 90.0, lon -180.0 to 180.0) Date: 20101201 00UTC to 20110228 12UTC CMC UKMO NCEP ECMWF oper_an ti enfo prod Mean method: fair Population: 180,180,180,180,180,180,180,180,180,180,179,179,179,179,179 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Slide 18-0.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Forecast Day Slide 18

m/s EPS spread/skill 850 wind tropics Ensemble Mean 850hPa wind speed Tropics (lat -20.0 to 20.0, lon -180.0 to 180.0) Date: 20081201 00UTC to 20110228 12UTC oper_an od enfo 0001 Mean method: standard 3 spread djf2010 rmse djf2010 spread djf2011 rmse djf2011 spread djf2009 rmse djf2009 2.5 2 1.5 1 Slide 19 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Forecast Day Slide 19

EPS skill 850 wind tropics 850hPa wind speed Continuous ranked probability skill score Tropics (lat -20.0 to 20.0, lon -180.0 to 180.0) Date: 20061201 00UTC to 20110228 12UTC oper_an od enfo 0001 Mean method: standard 0.7 2007 00,12utc 2008 00,12utc 2009 00,12utc 2010 00,12utc 2011 00,12utc 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Slide 20-0.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Forecast Day Slide 20

EPS probabilistic precipitation skill 8.0 7.5 7.0 CRPSS for 24-h Precipitation, ExTrop, ECMWF, 20010115-20110415 0.05 0.30 0.25 24-h Precip, 20101101 to 20110430, ExTrop 6.5 6.0 0.10 0.20 Lead time (days) 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 0.15 CRPSS 0.15 0.10 3.0 0.05 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Year 0.00 ECMWF ( 0.178) -0.05 JMA ( 0.066) UKMO ( 0.037) NCEP (-0.008) -0.10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Lead time (days) Slide 21 Slide 21

Product Development New parameters from deterministic forecast Height of lowest cloud base Height of 0 C level New parameters from EPS L, M, H cloud cover Slide 22 Slide 22

New EPS clustering New clustering operational since 16 November Graphical products on the ECMWF website at: http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/medium/eps/newclusters/newclusters/ Cluster fields available via dissemination The disseminated products are based on the day 5-7 time range (time steps 120, 132, 144, 156 and 168) Old clusters will be switched off later this year Slide 23 Slide 23

544 544 544 544 544 544 New EPS clustering Tuesday 7 June 2011 00UTC ECMWF EPS Cluster scenario - 500 hpa Geopotential Reference step t+120-168 Domain 75/340/30/40 Cont. in cluster=2 Det. in cluster=2 forecast t+120 VT:Sunday 12 June 2011 00UTC Cluster: 1(of 3), population: 22, repres. member: 21 forecast t+144 VT:Monday 13 June 2011 00UTC Cluster: 1(of 3), population: 22, repres. member: 21 forecast t+168 VT:Tuesday 14 June 2011 00UTC Cluster: 1(of 3), population: 22, repres. member: 21 544 544 544 forecast t+120 VT:Sunday 12 June 2011 00UTC Cluster: 2(of 3), population: 17, repres. member: 0 forecast t+144 VT:Monday 13 June 2011 00UTC Cluster: 2(of 3), population: 17, repres. member: 0 forecast t+168 VT:Tuesday 14 June 2011 00UTC Cluster: 2(of 3), population: 17, repres. member: 0 544 544 544 544 592 forecast t+120 VT:Sunday 12 June 2011 00UTC Cluster: 3(of 3), population: 12, repres. member: 4 forecast t+144 VT:Monday 13 June 2011 00UTC Cluster: 3(of 3), population: 12, repres. member: 4 forecast t+168 VT:Tuesday 14 June 2011 00UTC Cluster: 3(of 3), population: 12, repres. member: 4 544 544 Slide 24 544 Slide 24

Regime transitions metres 80 10 8 n. of clusters 6 40 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 1012141618202224262830 1 3 5 7 9 1113151719212325272931 2 4 6 8 10121416182022242628 2 4 6 8 1012141618202224262830 1 3 5 7 9 11131517192123252729 1 3 5 7 9 111315 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 0 DEC 2010 JAN 2011 FEB MAR APR MAY EPS forecast of large-scale weather regimes. Daily time series for November 2010 to April 2011 of the number of EPS clusters and observed climatological regimes (coloured Slide 25 circles). The climatological regime associated with each cluster is indicated by the colour of the bar: blue - positive NAO pattern, green - negative NAO, red blocking, violet - Atlantic ridge. The EPS clusters are computed over forecast days 5-7. Slide 25

Climatological regimes Slide 26 Slide 26

Tropical cyclones Tracking of tropical cyclones developing during forecast (medium-range and monthly products on web) Operational tracks deterministic up to 1 hour earlier Under test: replacement of operational tracker (will include tracks beyond 5 days) Slide 27 Slide 27

Tropical cyclones Typhoon Songda 19-29 May 2011 20110520 12 UTC Probability that 04W will pass within 120km radius during the next 120 hours tracks: black=oper, green=ctrl, blue=eps numbers: observed positions at t+..h 120 E 140 E 100 20 N 20 N 90 80 70 10 N 10 N 0 60 50 40 0 0 30 20 10 120 E 140 E 5 Operational tracker Slide 28 Slide 28

Tropical cyclones Date 20110520 12 UTC @ ECMWF Probability that 04W will pass within 120 km radius during the next 240 hours tracks: solid=oper; dot=ctrl 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 > 90 % Probability (%) of Tropical Cyclone Intensity falling in each category TD[up to 16] TS [17-32] HR1[33-42] HR2 [43-48] HR3 [> 48 m/s] 50 N 40 N 30 N 20 N 100 E 120 E 140 E 160 E 50 N 40 N 30 N 20 N 90 75 60 45 30 15 0 50 40 30 20 10 Fri 20 Sat 21 Sun 22 Mon 23 Tue 24 Wed 25 Thu 26 Fri 27 Sat 28 Sun 29 Mon 30 May 2011 10m Wind Speed (m/s) 10 N 0 N 100 E 120 E 140 E 160 E List of ensemble members numbers forecast Tropical Cyclone Intensity category in colours: TD[up to 16] TS[17-32] HR1 [33-42] HR2 [43-48] HR3 [ >48 m/s] +024 h : hr ct 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 +048 h : hr ct 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 +072 h : hr ct 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 +096 h : hr ct 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 +120 h : hr ct 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 +144 h : hr ct 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 +168 h : hr ct 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 +192 h : hr ct 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 +216 h : hr ct 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 +240 h : hr ct 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 10 N 0 N 0 1020 1010 1000 990 980 970 960 950 940 930 920 Fri 20 Sat 21 Sun 22 Mon 23 Tue 24 Wed 25 Thu 26 Fri 27 Sat 28 Sun 29 Mon 30 May 2011 Mean Sea Level Pressure in Tropical Cyclone Centre (hpa) Slide 29 Fri 20 Sat 21 Sun 22 Mon 23 Tue 24 Wed 25 Thu 26 Fri 27 Sat 28 Sun 29 Mon 30 May 2011 Slide 29

0-24h 24-48h 48-72h 72-96h 96-120h 120-144h 144-168h Track plumes for the TC are plotted for the EPS members, T1279 and Control. Each colour represents 24h forecast interval (EPS) Slide 30 Slide 30

Product Development Extra-tropical cyclone products (web products) Surface weather parameters (new web plots) Extension of EFI Slide 31 Slide 31

eccharts new interactive web plots Slide 32 Slide 32