Napa Valley Groundwater Sustainability: A Basin Analysis Report for the Napa Valley Subbasin

Similar documents
Napa Valley Groundwater Sustainability: A Basin Analysis Report for the Napa Valley Subbasin

DRAFT. REVISED Draft. Paso Robles Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan Chapter 6

Shasta Valley Groundwater Basin Boundary Modification

Sustainable Groundwater Management Act: Initial Notification of a Proposed Basin Boundary Modification

Napa County Comprehensive Groundwater Monitoring Program 2015 Annual Report and CASGEM Update

Tule Subbasin: Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) August 24, 2016 David De Groot, Professional Engineer 4Creeks, Inc.

Merced Groundwater Sustainability Plan. Public Meeting August 2, 2018

COUNTY OF GLENN BOARD REPORT. Submitted by Department of Agriculture

TECHNICAL PUBLICATION SJ WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT 2003 ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: MADERA SUBBASIN. Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) DRAFT PRELIMINARY BASIN BOUNDARY WATER BUDGET.

Hydrogeologic Conceptual Models for Regional Flow Systems

Delta-Mendota Groundwater Subbasin

C2VSim Fine Grid (C2VSim-FG) Version Development & Applications

Santa Clara Valley Water District Page 1 of 4

Stanislaus County Water Advisory Committee. May 30, 2018

WHITE WOLF GSA ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND SHORT-TERM SGMA COMPLIANCE GOALS

2001 ANNUAL REPORT on INTERBASIN TRANSFERS for RTP South and the Towns of Cary, Apex, and Morrisville

Appendix D. Model Setup, Calibration, and Validation

East Bay Plain Basin. EBMUD & City of Hayward. Groundwater Reliability Partnership Meeting March 22, 2017

Technical Memorandum. 1 Study Area. Interbasin Groundwater Flow Evaluation

Executive Summary. Water Quantity

Section 4: Model Development and Application

Hydrologic Modelling of the Upper Malaprabha Catchment using ArcView SWAT

Cuyama Basin North Fork Vineyard

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

CREDENTIALS. HERBERT E. JOHNSTON 185 Manville Hill Rd, Unit 203 Cumberland, Rhode Island (401)

S A N M AT E O P L A I N G R O U N D W AT E R B A S I N A S S E S S M E N T S TA K E H O L D E R W O R K S H O P # 4 D E C E M B E R 6,

WSWC/NOAA Workshops on S2S Precipitation Forecasting

COLUSA BASIN WATERSHED ASSESSMENT. Final. Prepared by: H. T. Harvey & Associates. In Collaboration With:

Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Future Water Use and Drought in the North Fork Red River Alluvial Aquifer: Progress Report

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Pajaro Valley Hydrologic Model Base-Case Scenario

Wisconsin s Hydrogeology: an overview

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFO IA

OREGON POPULATION FORECAST PROGRAM

Appropriation Directions for 2007

City of Manitou Springs

Mark S. Nordberg Geology and Groundwater Investigations Section North Central Region Office California Department of Water Resources

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

Regional groundwater mapping and model

Setting up SWAT to quantify water-related ecosystem services in a large East African watershed

GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION GROUND WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT BOARD BABARMAHAL, KATHMANDU, NEPAL

Butte County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal

Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

MEMORANDUM. Jerry Conrow, Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

Sacramento Valley Groundwater Basin, Sutter Subbasin

WEST TURLOCK SUBBASIN GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY. December 13, :00 PM Regular Meeting

LAUREL MARCUS California Land Stewardship Institute OVERVIEW OF GROUNDWATER STUDIES IN THE RUSSIAN RIVER WATERSHED

WORKING DRAFT List of Figures Groundwater Sustainability Plan for Santa Rosa Plain Subbasin. Figure Number. Figure Title

The World Bank. Key Dates. Project Development Objectives. Components. Implementation Status & Results Report. Key Project Dates

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INTRODUCTION TO HEC-HMS

COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL

TAMPA BAY TRIBUTARIES BASIN. Hydrogeological Setting

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions

Law on Spatial Planning

How to integrate wetland processes in river basin modeling? A West African case study

HyMet Company. Streamflow and Energy Generation Forecasting Model Columbia River Basin

State GIS Officer/GIS Data

Great Lakes Update. Volume 193: 2015 January through June Summary. Vol. 193 Great Lakes Update August 2015

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations.

Technical Memorandum No

Framework for the Basin-Wide Socio-Economic Analysis of Four Proposed Sediment Diversions. August 4, 2015

12 SWAT USER S MANUAL, VERSION 98.1

Drought Criteria. Richard J. Heggen Department of Civil Engineering University of New Mexico, USA Abstract

Appendix O. Sediment Transport Modelling Technical Memorandum

Appendix G. Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions and Historical Mining Northwest of the Centro Subarea in the Randsburg, Red Mountain, and Atolia Area

Guidelines for Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Reports for Essential and Hazardous Facilities and Major and Special-Occupancy Structures in Oregon

New Course Form. 1. Catalog Prefix and Number*: EST Course Title: Hydrologic Geology Lab. Pilot Course Information:

Evolution of the conceptual hydrogeologic and ground-water flow model for Las Vegas Valley, Clark County, Nevada

Appendix J Vegetation Change Analysis Methodology

Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows ( ) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing

Data Dictionary for Network of Conservation Areas Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

MISSOURI LiDAR Stakeholders Meeting

VILLAGE INFORMATION SYSTEM (V.I.S) FOR WATERSHED MANAGEMENT IN THE NORTH AHMADNAGAR DISTRICT, MAHARASHTRA

Las Vegas Valley is a fault-bounded basin containing hundreds of metres of Tertiary and Quaternary sediments derived from lacustrine, paludal, and

How Can We Sustain Groundwater Quality in Karst and Fracturedcarbonate. Maureen A. Muldoon Geology Department Univ. Of Wisconsin-Oshkosh

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

Arizona Drought Monitoring Sensitivity and Verification Analyses

Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping Eastern Newfoundland Executive Summary

Derogation Criteria for the Requirements for Generators Network Code

Atlas of the Upper Gila River Watershed

GOAL 7 AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND HAZARDS. To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards.

Land subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal in Hanoi, Vietnam

4.11 Groundwater model

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE STOCHASTIC HYDROLOGY. Course Instructor : Prof. P. P. MUJUMDAR Department of Civil Engg., IISc.

Preliminary Viability Assessment (PVA) for Lake Mendocino Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO)

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions

INSPIRE Monitoring and Reporting Implementing Rule Draft v2.1

Modeling Post-Development Runoff and Channel Impacts from Hydromodification: Practical Tools for Hydromodification Assessment

Water Supply Outlook. Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (ICPRB) 30 W. Gude Drive, Suite 450 Rockville, MD Tel: (301)

Country Fiche Estonia

Lake Tahoe Watershed Model. Lessons Learned through the Model Development Process

Pequabuck River Flooding Study and Flood Mitigation Plan The City of Bristol and Towns of Plainville and Plymouth, CT

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Operational water balance model for Siilinjärvi mine

WWDC Green River Basin Plan II, Groundwater Study (Level I) WSGS USGS WRDS October 23, 2008 Green River Basin (GRB) Basin Advisory Group

The World Bank. Key Dates. Project Development Objectives. Components. Implementation Status & Results Report. Key Project Dates

Transcription:

Napa Valley Groundwater Sustainability: A Basin Analysis Report for the Napa Valley Subbasin A report prepared pursuant to California Water Code Section 10733.6(b)(3) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (354.4(A)) 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background (354.4(b)) An overview of the following: Napa County s established role in the management of groundwater within the county (includes a summary of the Board of Supervisors appointed Groundwater Resources Advisory Committee and the sustainability objectives developed through that process), Review of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act s (SGMA) authorization of Alternatives to Groundwater Sustainability Plans (Alternative) Designation of the Napa Valley Groundwater Subbasin by the CA Department of Water Resources (DWR) as a medium priority pursuant to SGMA, Napa County s decision to develop a Basin Analysis Report as an Alternative defined by California Water Code Section 10733.6(b)(3); due January 1, 2017. DWR final emergency regulations for Alternative submittals (by June 1, 2016 DWR shall adopt final regulations for GSPs and Alternatives) A list of references and technical studies referenced by Napa County in developing the Basin Analysis Report 1.2 Purpose and Objectives To document groundwater usage and conditions in the Napa Valley Subbasin in the context of determining sustainable yield. 1.3 Beneficial Uses and Public Participation (354.10) [COUNTY] A description of the beneficial uses and users of groundwater in the basin, including the land uses and property interests potentially affected by the use of groundwater in the basin, the types of parties representing those interests, and the nature of consultation with those parties. A listing of public meetings at which the Basin Analysis Report was 1 Parenthetical references in Section, Sub-Section, and Figure titles refer to relevant sections of the Groundwater Sustainability Plan Regulations approved by the California Water Commission on May 18, 2016.

discussed, comments received, and a summary of responses by Napa County. An explanation of Napa County s decision-making process, identification of opportunities for public input, and methods used by Napa County to inform the public about the status of subbasin conditions and the status of projects and actions. 1.4 Agency Information (354.6) [COUNTY] The name and mailing address of for Napa County. The organization and management structure of applicable departments within Napa County. The name and contact information for persons responsible for implementing management actions and projects identified in the Basin Analysis Report. Napa County s legal authority to develop a Basin Analysis Report. An estimate of the costs for implementing management actions and projects and a general description of how Napa County plans to meet those costs. 1.5 Report Organization 2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING AND HYDROGEOLOGY 2.1 Groundwater Basins and Subbasins 2.1.1 Napa Valley Subbasin Setting and Boundaries (354.8) A characterization of the physical and political geography of the Napa Valley Groundwater Subbasin and Napa River Watershed. Includes maps of the area covered by this Report (denoting areas managed by Napa County and any adjacent basins), topographic map, and a map of jurisdictional boundaries within the area covered by the Report. 2.2 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model (354.14) 2.2.1 Regional Geology Includes at least two cross sections that display the information. Includes surficial geology (including locations of geologic cross sections) map. 2.2.2 Quaternary Alluvial Deposits of the Napa Valley Subbasin 2.2.3 Other Water Bearing Geologic Deposits of the Napa Valley Subbasin 2.2.4 Lateral and Vertical Subbasin Boundaries 2.2.5 Aquifer Parameters Physical properties of aquifer and aquitards, including vertical and lateral extent, hydraulic conductivity, and storativity.

2.2.6 Structural Geology/Barriers to Groundwater Flow Structural properties of the basin that restrict groundwater flow within the principal aquifers, including information regarding stratigraphic changes, truncation of units, etc. 3.0 MONITORING NETWORK AND PROGRAM Based on County GW Monitoring Plan (2013) and 2015 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report 3.1 Napa Valley Subbasin Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Network and Program Summary (354.34) Describes approaches used to monitor impacts to the beneficial uses or users of groundwater, monitor changes in groundwater conditions relative to the establishment of measurable objectives and minimum thresholds, and quantify annual changes in water budget components. (Minimum thresholds and measurable objectives established based on groundwater conditions are discussed in Chapter 7) 3.1.1 Groundwater Levels 3.1.2 Groundwater Quality 3.1.3 Surface Water 3.2 Monitoring Program Summary (354.36) Discussion of monitoring network for ongoing groundwater sustainability program. (Representative monitoring site selection discussed in Chapter 7) 3.3 Monitoring Program Best Management Practices (352.2, 352.4) Discussion of BMPs and monitoring protocols applied by the County. 4.0 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS (354.16) 4.1 Current and Historical Groundwater Conditions A summary of available data for historic and current conditions relevant to subbasin groundwater management. 4.1.1 Groundwater Levels Presentation of groundwater level data for the unconfined and semi-confined geologic deposits. Includes groundwater elevation data (spring and fall contour maps for current and historic conditions, and representative hydrographs) demonstrating flow directions, lateral and vertical gradients, and regional pumping patterns based on the best available data.

4.1.2 Groundwater Quality General water quality of the principal aquifers 4.1.3 Surface Water Conditions Presentation of the best available data on surface water/groundwater interactions. Identification of interconnected surface water systems within the basin; estimate of the quantity and timing of depletions of those systems. Includes maps showing surface water features significant to the management of the basin, and the source and point of delivery for imported water supplies. A. Historical surface water conditions a. Overview of surface water features, setting, and historical monitoring b. Map of streamflow gage locations with representative wells and groundwater/surface water monitoring sites c. Historical annual average streamflow (all years with base period identified) d. Historical monthly average streamflow (all years with base period identified) e. Historical dry flow conditions duration, timing, and variability B. Historical estimated baseflow conditions a. Historical estimated baseflow related to observed streamflow b. Average estimated baseflow by water year type (all years and base period) c. Overall average estimated baseflow over water year C. Relationships between baseflow and groundwater levels D. Surface water and groundwater dependent ecosystems Discussion of occurrences of vegetation and wetlands, and their association with surface water and groundwater. a. An overview of vegetation b. An overview of types of wetlands and their spatial distribution E. Summary of historical surface water quality Includes best available data on surface water quality 4.1.4 Seawater/Freshwater Interface Discussion of seawater interface or intrusion conditions in the basin, including maps and cross sections of the saltwater front for each principal aquifer. Includes local groundwater elevation contour maps and chloride data.

4.1.5 Land Subsidence Discussion of availability of land subsidence monitoring and graphs showing the vertical displacement of land using CGPS data 4.1.6 Data Gaps (354.38) 4.2 Groundwater Recharge Description of the current understanding of recharge processes in the subbasin Includes maps: soil survey map, delineation of existing recharge areas/potential recharge areas/discharge areas. 4.2.1 Areas of Naturally-Occurring Recharge 4.2.2 Areas of Potential Artificial Recharge Presentation of best available data to delineate areas within the Napa Valley Subbasin where potential future artificial recharge projects would be best suited. Includes a discussion of recharge potential mapped by the UC Davis Soil Agricultural Groundwater Banking Index (O Geene et al.) and Basin Characterization Model (Flint et al.) 5.0 HISTORICAL, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND 5.1 Land Use and Water Demands A summary of projections, goals, or targets contained in the Napa County General Plan and Urban Water Management Plans within the subbasin 5.1.1 Historical Land Use and Water Demands 5.1.2 Current Land Use and Water Demands 5.1.3 Projected Land Use and Water Demands [COUNTY Land Use] 5.2 Groundwater Includes a summary of the distribution and density of wells by type (i.e., domestic, agricultural, municipal, other) located in the Napa Valley Subbasin. 5.2.1 Historical Groundwater Supply 5.2.2 Current Groundwater Supply 5.2.3 Projected Groundwater Supply

5.3 Surface Water 5.3.1 Historical Surface Water Supply Include an analysis of surface water supply for irrigation and other beneficial uses (e.g., frost protection, domestic, recreational). Annual water diversion and use reported by water right holders to State Water Resources Control Board (from 2008 to 2014) and available data from the four municipalities within the subbasin are referenced in this discussion. 5.3.2 Current Surface Water Supply Includes an analysis of surface water supply for irrigation and other beneficial uses using data reported in 2015 annual water diversion and use reported by water right holders to State Water Resources Control Board and available data from the four municipalities within the subbasin. 5.3.3 Projected Surface Water Supply Summarizes projections of surface water supply and demand considering expected changes in land use and other controlling factors (e.g., irrigation methods, use of reclaimed water, water conservation practices). 5.4 Recycled Water 5.4.1 Historical Recycled Water Supply 5.4.2 Current Recycled Water Supply 5.4.3 Projected Recycled Water Supply 6.0 SUSTAINABLE YIELD ANALYSIS (354.18) Summary of SGMA requirements for sustainable yield analysis. 6.1 Napa Valley Subbasin Hydrologic Base Period Evaluation of available long-term precipitation and streamflow data to determine appropriate end points for subbasin water budget analyses, including wet and dry periods and other criteria. 6.2 Summary of Water Year 2015 Hydrologic Conditions An evaluation of precipitation, gaged runoff, and other data as necessary to characterize Napa Valley Subbasin conditions relevant to the January 1, 2015 SGMA Date of Accountability 6.3 Water Budget Framework Includes water budget analyses for the Napa Valley Subbasin hydrologic base period, 2015, and a projected future scenario.

6.4 Root Zone Model 6.4.1 Methodology 6.4.2 Land Use Model Inputs 6.4.3 Soil Model Inputs 6.4.4 Hydrologic Model Inputs 6.4.5 Crop Coefficient Model Inputs 6.4.6 Root Zone Model Results 6.5 Subbasin Water Budget 6.5.1 Subbasin Inflows 6.5.2 Subbasin Outflows 6.6 Subbasin Water Budget Results Includes results for the Napa Valley Subbasin hydrologic base period, the 2015 water year, and a future scenario. 6.6.1 Qualitative Consideration of the Napa-Sonoma Lowlands Subbasin 6.7 Groundwater Level Change in Groundwater Storage Analysis Graph showing estimates in the change in groundwater storage, demonstrating the annual and cumulative change in groundwater storage volume between seasonal high groundwater conditions, including the annual groundwater use and water year type. 6.7.1 Groundwater Contours and Potentiometric Surfaces for Key Base Period Years Includes a presentation of data from unconfined and semi-confined aquifers, based on best available data. 6.8 Sensitivity Analysis Identify sources of uncertainty in the water budget analysis and groundwater level change in storage analysis. 6.9 Sustainable Yield 7.0 NAPA VALLEY SUBBASIN SUSTAINABILITY GOAL (354.24)

Establishment of a sustainability goal for the Napa Valley Subbasin that includes the absence of undesirable results, established based on subbasin conditions as of January 1, 2015. 7.1 SGMA Requirement to Develop a Sustainability Goal (354.24) 7.2 Sustainability Indicators and Undesirable Results (354.26) Establishes undesirable results for applicable sustainability indicators, including a description of the process and criteria used to define undesirable results for the Napa Valley Subbasin. 7.3 Representative Monitoring Sites 7.4 Minimum Thresholds (354.28) Establishes preliminary minimum thresholds that quantify groundwater conditions for each applicable sustainability indicator at identified monitoring sites or representative monitoring sites. Includes justification for thresholds set based on best available data and existing monitoring networks. Thresholds for multiple sustainability indicators may be lumped according to data availability, provided sufficient technical justification. 7.5 Measureable Objectives (354.30) Establishes measurable objectives that maintain or improve groundwater conditions. Preliminary measurable objectives are established for each sustainability indicator. 7.6 Management Area 8.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION AND REPORTING 8.1 Data Reporting Schedule (354.40, 356.2) In part from County Groundwater Monitoring Plan (2013). Monitoring data stored in the data management system are to be submitted to the Department electronically. 8.2 Data Management and Disclosure Incorporate County document developed during GRAC process to be incorporated as appendix. 9.0 SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT (354.44) A description of the projects and management actions the Agency has determined will achieve the sustainability goal for the basin. 9.1 Groundwater Ordinance (354.20) 9.2 Water Availability Analysis and Discretionary Use Permits 9.3 Monitoring Network Refinement and Expansion

9.4 Education and Collaboration [COUNTY] 9.4.1 Watershed Information Conservation Council 9.4.2 Well Owner Outreach and Self-Directed Well Monitoring Education Napa County s Wellbeing Project 9.5 Other Groundwater Management Strategies [COUNTY] 9.5.1 Potential Changes in Land Use Controls to Consider A. Zoning B. Building Code C. Landscaping D. Limits on new or major changes to existing projects 9.5.2 Potential Changes to Well Regulations to Consider A. Taxes and Fees B. Metering C. Withdrawal Limits D. Restrictions on new wells 9.5.3 Recycled Water [COUNTY] 9.5.4 Groundwater Ordinances [COUNTY] 9.5.5 Other Actions in Cooperation with Cities and Other Stakeholders [COUNTY] 9.6 Best Management Practices Describe the County s process for review of BMPs and refinement of monitoring protocols, Subbasin data analysis, and management actions. 9.7 Annual Report 9.8 Five-Year Subbasin Conditions Reporting and Evaluation (356.4) Describes the process to be used by Napa County to evaluate its groundwater management efforts, includes monitoring network description, evaluation of the subbasin setting in light of any new information or changes in water use, consideration of changes in subbasin groundwater conditions, description of management actions implemented and their effect on subbasin conditions, and additional management tools or actions needed to maintain subbasin sustainability. 10.0 SUMMARY

Appendices Appendix A. Basin Analysis Report and Groundwater Sustainability Plan Emergency Regulations Comparison Table Appendix B. Napa County Groundwater Resources Advisory Committee, Groundwater Sustainability Objectives (February 27, 2014) Appendix C. Napa County Groundwater Resources Advisory Committee, Data Management and Disclosure Preliminary List of Figures Figure 2-1 (354.8 (a) (1-3)) Basin Map(s); Area covered by Plan, areas managed by Agency. Adjudicated areas, other agencies. Jurisdictional boundaries. Figure 2-2 (354.8 (a) (4)) Existing land use designations and the identification of water use sector and water source type Figure 2-3 (354.8 (a) (5)) General distribution of wells, location and extent of communities dependent upon groundwater Figure 2-4 (354.14 (c)) Hydrogeologic conceptual model; At least two scaled cross-sections Figure 2-5 (354.14 (d)(1)) Topographic Map Figure 2-6 (354.14 (d)(2)) Surficial geology including locations of cross sections Figure 2-7 (354.14 (d)(3)) NRCS Soil Map Figure 2-8 (354.14 (d)(4)) Recharge and discharge areas Figure 2-9 (354.14 (d)(5)) Surface water bodies Figure 2-10 (354.14 (d)(6)) The source and point of delivery for imported water supplies. Figure 3-1 (354.32, 34) Map of groundwater level monitoring sites Figure 3-2 (354.32, 34) Map of groundwater quality monitoring sites Figure 3-3 (354.32, 34) Map of surface water monitoring sites Figure 4-1 (354.16 (a)(1)) Groundwater elevation contour maps associated with the current seasonal high and seasonal low for each principal aquifer within the basin. Figure 4-2 (354.16 (a)(2)) Hydrographs depicting long-term groundwater elevations, historical highs and lows, and hydraulic gradients between principal aquifers. Figure 4-3 (354.16 (b)) A graph depicting estimates of the change in groundwater in storage annual and cumulative change Figure 4-4 (354.16 (c)) Freshwater/Seawater Interface incl maps and cross sections... for each principal aquifer Figure 4-5 (354.16 (d)) Map of the location of known groundwater contamination sites and plumes Figure 4-6 (354.16 (e)) Map depicting measurements of land surface and potential compaction Figure 4-7 (354.16 (f)) Identification of interconnected surface water systems. Map not explicitly required Figure 4-8 (354.16 (g)) Identification of groundwater dependent ecosystems within the basin.

Figure 6-1 Precipitation and Streamgage Sites Reviewed for Base Period Selection Figure 6-2 Napa State Hospital Gage Water Year Precipitation (1950-2015) and Cumulative Departure Figure 6-3 Calistoga Gage Water Year Precipitation (1950-2015) and Cumulative Departure Figure 6-4 Napa Valley Major Land Use Survey Classes by Year Figure 6-5 Napa Valley Subbasin Agricultural Land Use Survey Vineyard Class by Year Irrigated Acreage Only Figure 6-6 Napa Valley Subbasin Agricultural Land Use Survey Non-Vineyard Classes by Year Irrigated Acreage Only Figure 6-7 Napa Valley Subbasin and Subbasin Watershed Figure 6-8 (354.18 (a),(b)) Schematic of Water Budget Components in the Napa Valley Subbasin Figure 6-9 1987 Land Use Categories Figure 6-10 2011 Land Use Categories Figure 6-11 Root Zone Model - Avilable Water Capacity Figure 6-12 Root Zone Model total annual groundwater storage change and average precipitation for Subbasin from 1988 to 2025 Figure 6-13 Net Annual Subbasin Storage Change, 1988 2015 Figure 6-14 Groundwater Level Change in Storage - Data Locations Figure 6-15 Depth to Base of Aquifer Figure 6-16 Depth to Groundwater - Spring 2015 Figure 6-17 Groundwater Level Change in Storage Figure 7-1 Napa Valley Subbasin Representative Monitoring Sites Figure 7-2 Northeast Napa Subarea Study Area

DRAFT Basin Analysis Report/GSP Regulations Comparison GSP Regulations Reference Article 5. Plan Contents - GSP Subarticle 1. Administrative Information 354.4(a) General Information Exectutive Summary 354.4(b) General Information 1.1 Background 354.6 Agency Information 1.4 Agency Information Plan Contents - Basin Analysis Report Administrative Information 354.8 Description of Plan Area 2.1.1 Napa Valley Subbasin Setting and Boundary 354.10 Notice and Communication 1.3 Beneficial Uses and Public Participation Subarticle 2. Basin Setting Basin Setting 354.14 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model 2.2 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model 354.16 Groundwater Conditions 4.0 Groundwater Conditions 6.0 Sustainable Yield Analysis, 5.0 Historical, Current, and 354.18 Water Budget Projected Water Supply and Demand 354.20 Management Areas 9.1 Management Areas and Groundwater Ordinances Subarticle 3. Sustainable Management Criteria Sustainable Management Criteria 354.24 Sustainability Goal 7.0 Napa Valley Subbasin Sustainability Goal 354.26 Undersirable Results 7.1 Undesirable Results 354.28 Minimum Thresholds 7.2 Minimum Thresholds 354.30 Measurable Objectives 7.3 Measureable Objectives Subarticle 4. Monitoring Networks Monitoring Network/Programs 354.34 Monitoring Network 3.1 Napa Valley Subbasin Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Network and Program Summary 354.36 Representative Monitoring 3.2 Monitoring Program Summary 354.38 Assessment and Improvement of Monitoring Network 4.1.6 Data Gaps 354.40 Reporting Monitoring Data to the Department 8.1 Reporting Schedule Subarticle 5. Projects and Management Actions Projects and Management Actions 354.44 Projects and Management Actions 9.0 Sustainable Groundwater Management Article 6. Department Evaluation and Assessment Appendix 355.2 Department Review of Adopted Plan Napa County submits plan by January 1, 2017 355.4 Criteria for Plan Evaluation Basin Report covers entire basin and prepared in accorandance with other requirements 355.6 Periodic Review of Plan by Department County will respond to Department requests as needed 355.8 Department Review of Annual Reports 355.10 Plan Amendments Article 7. Annual Reports and Periodic Evaluations by the Agency County will provide the Department with an Annual Report by April 1 of each year following the adoption of the Basin Analysis Report County will provide Department with substantive updates to Basin Analysis Report, if such occur prior to 5-year updates Reporting and Evaluation 356.2 Annual Reports 8.1 Data Reporting Schedule, 9.7 Annual Report 356.4 Periodic Evaluation by Agency 9.8 Five-Year Subbasin Conditions Reporting and Evaluation