Experience of Vibration and Noise Measurements of Small Hydro Power Plants

Similar documents
329. Vibrodiagnostics and Dynamic Behaviour of Machinery in Small Hydroelectric Power Plants*

Efficient runner safety assessment during early design phase and root cause analysis

Investigation of Flow Profile in Open Channels using CFD

VIBRATION ANALYSIS AND REPAIR PROCESS FOR THE VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR SMOKE DRAIN IN THE THERMAL POWER PLANT

This Capstone Project will address the analysis and diagnosis of the Steam Turbo-Generator (STG) machine vibration problems in Thermal Power Plant

FEDSM99 S-291 AXIAL ROTOR OSCILLATIONS IN CRYOGENIC FLUID MACHINERY

CHAPTER 4 FAULT DIAGNOSIS OF BEARINGS DUE TO SHAFT RUB

HYDRAULIC TURBINES. Hydraulics and Hydraulic Machines

Mitigation of Diesel Generator Vibrations in Nuclear Applications Antti Kangasperko. FSD3020xxx-x_01-00

ROTATING MACHINERY VIBRATION

Nonlinear Rolling Element Bearings in MADYN 2000 Version 4.3

Hydraulic Turbines. Table 6.1 Parameters of hydraulic turbines. Power P (kw) Speed N (rpm)

ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE VIBRATION INCONSISTENCIES IN DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF HIGH POWER TURBOGENERATOR ROTATING SYSTEM

LARGE STATOR/ROTOR ECCENTRICITY - A UNIT FAILURE CASE STUDY

VIBRATION ANALYSIS OF E-GLASS FIBRE RESIN MONO LEAF SPRING USED IN LMV

IDENTIFICATION OF HYDRO UNIT STIFFNESSES, CRITICAL SPEED AND VIBRATING MASSES BASED ON VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS

Vibration Analysis of a Centrifugal Pump

Using flexible gears in order to detect the root cause of gear damage. Heidi Götz / Dr. Wolfgang Stamm Darmstadt,

Dimensions of propulsion shafts and their permissible torsional vibration stresses

Introduction to Fluid Machines and Compressible Flow Prof. S. K. Som Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Engineering Failure Analysis

Piedmont Chapter Vibration Institute Training Symposium 10 May, 2012 FIELD BALANCING OF ROTATING MACHINERY.

Effect of an hourglass shaped sleeve on the performance of the fluid dynamic bearings of a HDD spindle motor

A modal approach for vibration analysis and condition monitoring of a centrifugal pump

Generally, there exists an optimum tip-speed-ratio, λ that maximized C p. The exact λ depends on the individual wind turbine design

Behaviour of Earth Dam under Seismic Load Considering Nonlinearity of the Soil

Fast and Ultimate Vibration Field Solution: From Problem Detection to Field Performance Validation

ANALYSIS AND IDENTIFICATION IN ROTOR-BEARING SYSTEMS

Contents. 2 Basic Components Aerofoils Force Generation Performance Parameters xvii

Dynamic Analysis on Vibration Isolation of Hypersonic Vehicle Internal Systems

Evaluation of a Six-DOF Electrodynamic Shaker System

PLEASURE VESSEL VIBRATION AND NOISE FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Acoustics-An An Overview. Lecture 1. Vibro-Acoustics. What? Why? How? Lecture 1

Turbines and turbine sets Measurement of emitted airborne noise Engineering/survey method

Introduction to Fluid Machines and Compressible Flow Prof. S.K Som Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

EFFECT OF HYDRODYNAMIC THRUST BEARINGS ON ROTORDYNAMICS

ROLLER BEARING FAILURES IN REDUCTION GEAR CAUSED BY INADEQUATE DAMPING BY ELASTIC COUPLINGS FOR LOW ORDER EXCITATIONS

UNCERTAINTIES FOR PRESSURE-TIME EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENTS

BEL Frahm Damper System

Dept.of Mechanical Engg, Defence Institute of Advanced Technology, Pune. India

Vibration Control Prof. Dr. S. P. Harsha Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee

Improving Electromotor Process in Water Pump by Using Power Spectral Density, Time Signal and Fault Probability Distribution Function

ISO 5136 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics Determination of sound power radiated into a duct by fans and other air-moving devices In-duct method

Dynamic Behavior of a 2 Variable Speed Pump- Turbine Power Plant

Mitigations to Flow Induced Vibration (FIV) in Control Valve Piping System using Visco-Elastic Dampers & Neoprene Pads

Dynamic model for hydro-turbine generator units based on a database method for guide bearings

COUPLED USE OF FEA AND EMA FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF AN INJECTION PUMP

Analysis and Experiments of the Linear Electrical Generator in Wave Energy Farm utilizing Resonance Power Buoy System

BME-A PREVIOUS YEAR QUESTIONS

This equation of motion may be solved either by differential equation method or by graphical method as discussed below:

Mechanical vibration Rotor balancing. Part 2: Vocabulary. Vibrations mécaniques Équilibrage des rotors Partie 2: Vocabulaire. First edition

We are IntechOpen, the first native scientific publisher of Open Access books. International authors and editors. Our authors are among the TOP 1%

CASE STUDY BINGA, PHILIPPINES

Dynamics of Machinery

PROPELLER INDUCED STRUCTURAL VIBRATION THROUGH THE THRUST BEARING

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Engineering Tripos Part IB. Part IB Paper 8: - ELECTIVE (2)

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF LIGHT WEIGHT MOTOR VEHICLE FLYWHEEL M.LAVAKUMAR #1, R.PRASANNA SRINIVAS* 2

CASE STUDY BINGA, PHILIPPINES

Mechanical Vibrations Prof. Rajiv Tiwari Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

Hydraulics Prof. Dr. Arup Kumar Sarma Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

Analysis of shock force measurements for the model based dynamic calibration

Hydro-acoustic resonance behavior in presence of a precessing vortex rope: observation of a lock-in phenomenon at part load Francis turbine operation

Turbine Engineering for Hydropower Plants

Vibration modelling of machine tool structures

Dynamic Analysis of Pelton Turbine and Assembly

Special edition paper

Harmonic Analysis Of Engine Crankshaft As A Fixed Beam

Dispersion of critical rotational speeds of gearbox: effect of bearings stiffnesses

Optimizing Centrifugal Pump Performance by Different Blade Configuration Patterns

Number Title Year Organization Page

Varuvan Vadivelan. Institute of Technology LAB MANUAL. : 2013 : B.E. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING : III Year / V Semester. Regulation Branch Year & Semester

Geoscientific Instrumentation in River Valley Projects

Department of Mechanical FTC College of Engineering & Research, Sangola (Maharashtra), India.

Generators for wind power conversion

Numerical analysis of three-lobe journal bearing with CFD and FSI

3 Energy Exchange in Turbomachines

Impedance of standard impact sources and their effect on impact sound pressure level of floors

ISO 9906 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Rotodynamic pumps Hydraulic performance acceptance tests Grades 1 and 2

Subject-wise Tests. Tests will be activated at 6:00 pm on scheduled day

ME 316: Thermofluids Laboratory

Lecture 4: Wind energy

Investigation on fluid added mass effect in the modal response of a pump-turbine runner

Comparison of discharge measurements - Thermodynamic to US Clamp- On, stationary US and Needle Opening Curve

ENERGY DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS IN A LOW HEAD FRANCIS TURBINE DURING THERMODYNAMIC EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENTS

MV Module 5 Solution. Module 5

S.C. Rulmenti S.A. Barlad Romania Republicii Street No

Rotating Group Design for Vane Pump Flow Ripple Reduction

SEM-2016(03)-II MECHANICAL ENGINEERING. Paper -11. Please read each of the following instructions carefully before. attempting questions.

Open channel discharge measurement using the acoustic transit time method a case study

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

A nonlinear dynamic vibration model of defective bearings: The importance of modelling the finite size of rolling elements

Introduction to Fluid Machines and Compressible Flow Prof. S. K. Som Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

1917. Numerical simulation and experimental research of flow-induced noise for centrifugal pumps

SSC-JE EE POWER SYSTEMS: GENERATION, TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION SSC-JE STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDY MATERIAL

Introduction to Acoustics Exercises

Measurement Techniques for Engineers. Motion and Vibration Measurement

THE TRIAL STUDY ABOUT THE MICRO POWER GENERATION BY USE OF VORTEX INDUCED VIBRATION

An Investigation into the Effects of Rolling Element Bearing Flexibility in a Wind Turbine Planetary Gearbox

Research of ArtemiS in a Ring-Plate Cycloid Reducer

Transcription:

Experience of Vibration and Noise Measurements of Small Hydro Power Plants Arun Kumar 1, B K Gandhi 2, Pradeep Chandra 3* Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Roorkee -247 667, India 1 & 3* Alternate Hydro Energy Centre, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 2 Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 3 * E-mail: aheciitr.ak@gmail.com, bhupendragandhi@gmail.com, pradeepbhatt1@gmail.com, Abstract At different load operation of hydropower units, fluctuation of pressure energy causes vibrations and noise in the rotating parts of the units. Over 175 hydropower plants, mostly below 25 MW have been evaluated for performance field test by Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) team during the year 25-215 in 11 states of India on irrigation canals, rivers and existing dam outlets. Various parameters like discharge, head, power etc. were measured during the field testing on turbines and generators. Field measurements also included sound and vibration measurements of each unit and their analysis is presented here. Axial component of displacement at all measuring points for vibration measurement at driving end bearing of generator varied from 4.15µm to 2µm, and radial component varied from 1.912µm to 243.22µm for Francis turbines. For Kaplan turbines, axial component varied from 3.673 µm to 195 µm, and radial component varied from 2.943 µm to 291 µm. For Pelton turbines axial component varied from 4.4 µm to 299 µm and radial component varied from 9.14 µm to 546 µm. Sound level at all measuring points varied from 81.95-14 db, 8.45-1.7 db, and 82.4-11.4 db for Francis, Kaplan and Pelton turbine, respectively. There was no fixed trend observed for any type of turbine or generators. 1. Introduction Vibration measurement in hydro turbines and generators is an essential part of measurement. Vibration produced in turbines may cause severe damages to the rotating parts, specially, when turbines operate at part load conditions. It is necessary to identify the causes of vibration of rotating parts to avoid these damages. International standard (ISO) 1816-5 [1] is the basic document describing the general requirements for evaluating the vibrations of various type of rotating machines when the vibration measurements are made on non-rotating parts. Two criteria are provided for assessing the machine vibrations [1]. One considers the magnitude of observed vibration and the second considers the changes in the magnitudes. However it must be recognized, that these two criteria do not form the only basis for judging the severity of vibrations. For most machine types, it is also common to judge the vibration based on measurements taken on the rotating shaft [5].

Shaft vibration measurement requirements and criteria are addressed in separate international standard ISO 7919-1 [2] and ISO 7919-5 [3]. The ISO 1816-5 [1] provides the guidelines for applying the bearing housing vibration evaluation criteria measured under normal operating conditions at the bearings, bearing pedestals or bearing housings of the main machine sets in hydraulic power generating and pumping plants. These guidelines are presented in terms of both steady-state running vibration and any amplitude changes which may occur in these steady values. The vibratory condition of a machine is assessed by the consideration of both the bearing housing vibration and the associated shaft vibration. ISO 1816 provides specific guidance for assessing hydraulic machines with speeds from 6 to 18 rotation per minute (rpm), shell or shoe type sleeve bearings and main engine power of 1 MW and more. 2. Mechanical arrangement Due to significant differences in design and arrangement, hydraulic machines are separated into four principal groups as per radial bearing stiffness and are as follows [1] : Group 1: Horizontal machine sets with pedestal or end-shield bearings mounted on a rigid foundation as shown in Fig. 1(a,b), usually with operational speeds of above 3 rpm. Group 2: Horizontal machine sets with bearing housings which are only braced against the casing of the hydraulic machine as shown in Fig. 2, usually with operational speeds of less than 3 rpm. Group 3: Vertical machine sets with bearing housings which are all braced against the foundation as shown in Fig. 3, usually with operational speeds of between 6 to 18 rpm. Group 4: Vertical machine sets with lower bearing housings braced against the foundation and upper bearing housings braced against the generator stator only as shown in Fig. 4, usually with operational speeds of between 6 to1 rpm. 3. Measurement type Absolute bearing housing vibration measurements are commonly made on hydraulic machine sets using seismic transducers. Seismic transducer is used for measuring the vibration velocity v rms (root mean square velocity) in millimetres per second or, the vibration displacement s p-p (peak to peak displacement) in micrometres. The vibration displacement s p-p can also be measured directly as a relative quantity using displacement transducers in the case where a rigid non-vibrating support can be found. Because of the special nature of the vibratory behaviour of hydraulic machines and their different speed ranges, these quantities have favoured ranges of application as follows:[1]

a) For low-speed machines (below 3 rpm), the preferred measurement quantity is the vibration displacement s p-p If the spectrum is expected to contain highfrequency components, the evaluation should normally be based on broad-band measurements of both displacement and velocity. b) For medium- and high-speed machines (3 to 18 rpm), the preferred measurement quantity is the vibration velocity v rms. If the spectrum is expected to contain low-frequency components, the evaluation should normally be based on broad-band measurements of both velocity and displacement. Figure 1. (a) Horizontal machine with pedestal bearings and (b) horizontal machine with end shield bearings. [1] Figure 2. Horizontal machine set with bearing housings braced against the casing of the hydraulic machine. [1]

Figure 3.Vertical machine set with bearing housing braced against the foundation. [1] Figure 4. Vertical machine set with lower bearing housings braced against the foundation and upper bearing housings braced against the generator stator. [1] 4. Observations by IIT Roorkee team Over 175 hydropower plants, mostly below 25 MW have been tested by IIT Roorkee team during the year 25-215 in 11 states of India on irrigation canals, rivers and existing irrigation dams outlet. Location of these stations are shown in Fig. 5. Total number of different turbines tested are given in Table 1. Only one turbine has been tested and measured at one station as per term of reference as at most of the station all turbines are similar.

Table1. Different types of Turbines tested by the team of Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Turbine Type No. of Projects Francis 67 Kaplan 64 Pelton 44 Total 175 Figure 5: Location of hydropower plants for which testing has been carried out.

For Francis turbine at thrust bearing the value of radial and axial vibrations in micrometer were found to vary from 14 to 19 μm, and.49 to 2 μm, respectively, at point 1. Similarly at point 2 the value of radial and axial vibrations in micro-meter were found to vary from 13.27 to 11 μm and 16.58 to 161 μm, respectively and at point 3, the radial and axial components were found to vary from 21.44-131 μm and from 16.98 to 162 μm, respectively. 2 1 3 4 Figure 6: Position of measurement around the rotating machine. The value of vibration velocity for Francis turbine at point 1 in radial direction was found to vary from.176 to 2.881 mm/sec and axial direction, it varied from.199 to 3.114 mm/s. similarly at point 2 in radial direction the velocity component was found to vary from.271 to 2.277 mm/s and in axial direction it varied from.188 to 3.8 mm/s, at point 3, in radial direction the component varied from.232 to 2.97 mm/s and in axial direction the value varies from.321 to 4.26 mm/sec, and at point 4 in radial direction the value varies from.358 to 2.475 mm/s and in axial direction it varies from.461 to 4.18 mm/sec. The value of vibration in turbine is measured in both µm and in mm/s for both axial and radial directions. The average deviation in the minimum value of vibration in µm in radial direction in all the four measuring point is 16.237 µm and maximum value of vibration in µm in radial direction is 143.67 µm. Similarly in axial direction the minimum value of vibration µm is 11.323 and the maximum value is 174.33 µm. The minimum average value of vibration in radial direction in mm/s is.129 and maximum value is 2.651 mm/s. similarly in axial direction the minimum average value of vibration is.292 mm/s and maximum value is 3.87 mm/s. Vibration velocity and displacement data in radial and axial direction for different turbines and generators connected to turbines are shown in Figs. 7 to 15.

2 displacement in radial direction displacement in axial direction 5 16 4 12 8 Velocity in mm/s 3 2 4 1.5 1 1.5 2 Figure 7: Vibration velocity and displacement data for Francis turbines. 8 displacement in radial direction displacement in axial direction 4 3.5 6 3 4 2 2.5 2 1.5 1 Velocity in mm/s.5.1.2.3.4 Figure 8: Vibration velocity and displacement data for Pelton turbines.

displacement in radial direction displacement in axial direction 1 16 9 8 12 8 4 7 6 5 4 3 2 velocity in mm/s 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 specific speed 1 Figure 9: Vibration velocity and displacement data for Kaplan turbines. 28 displacement in radial direction displacement in axial direction 6 24 5 2 16 12 8 4 Velocity in mm/s 3 2 4 1.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Figure 1: Vibration velocity and displacement data for driving end bearing of generators connected to Francis turbines.

12 displacement in radial direction displacement in axial direction 4.5 3.5 8 4 2.5 1.5 Velocity in mm/s.5 -.5.5.1.15.2.25.3.35 Figure 11: Vibration velocity and displacement data for driving end bearing of generators connected to Pelton turbines. 24 displacement in radial direction displacement in axial direction 2 2 18 16 16 12 8 14 12 1 8 6 velocity in mm/s 4 4 2 2 3 4 5 6 specific speed Figure 12: Vibration velocity and displacement data for driving end bearing of generators connected to Kaplan turbines.

2 displacement in radial direction displacement in axial direction 14 16 12 12 8 4 1 8 6 4 2 Velocity in mm/s.4.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Figure 13: Vibration velocity and displacement data for non-driving end bearing of generators connected to Francis turbines. 24 displacement in radial direction displacement in axial direction 1.8 2 16 12 8 4 1.2 Velocity in mm/s.6.5.1.15.2.25.3.35 Figure 14: Vibration velocity and displacement data for non-driving end bearing of generators connected to Pelton turbines.

4 displacement in radial direction disoplacement in xial direction 2 32 16 24 16 12 8 velocity in mm/s 8 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 Figure 15: Vibration velocity and displacement data for non-driving end bearing of generators connected to Kaplan turbines. Measured values of vibration velocity and displacement in radial and axial direction for Francis turbines are shown in Fig 7. Vibration velocities in axial direction are below 1.6 mm/s for 92.6% of the turbines and are above 2.5 mm/s for 7.6% of turbines. And in radial direction, vibration velocity values are below 1.6 mm/s for 92% turbines and above 2.5 mm/s for 8% turbines. Vibration displacements in axial direction are below 5μm for 81.25% turbines, in the range 5-8μm for 12.5% turbines and above 8μm for 6.25% turbines. Similarly in radial direction, the vibration displacements are below 5μm for 75% turbines, in the range 5-8μm for 18.75% turbines and above 8μm for 6.25% turbines. Measured values of vibration velocity and displacement in radial and axial direction for Pelton turbines are shown in Fig 8. Vibration velocities in axial direction are below 1.6 mm/s for 72.72% of turbines, in the range 1.6-2.5 mm/s for 18.18% turbines and above 2.5mm/s for 1% turbines. And in radial direction, vibration velocities are below 1.6 mm/s for 66.66% turbines, in the range 1.6-2.5 mm/s for 8% turbines and above 2.5 mm/s for 8.33% turbines. Vibration displacements in axial direction are below 5μm for 85.72 % turbines, in the range 5-8μm for 14.25% turbines, and above 8 μm for remaining turbines. Similarly in radial direction, the vibration displacements are below 5μm for 85.7% turbines, in the range 5-8μm for 12.5% turbines and above 8 μm for remaining turbines.

Measured values of vibration velocity and displacement in radial and axial directions for Kaplan turbines are shown in Fig 9. Vibration velocities in axial direction are below 1.6 mm/s for 83.33% of turbines, in the range 1.6-2.5 mm/s for 5.35% turbines and above 2.5mm/s for 11.11% turbines. And in radial direction, vibration velocities are below 1.6 mm/s for 89.25% turbines, in the range 1.6-2.5 mm/s for 5.2% turbines and above 2.5 mm/s for 5.2% turbines. Vibration displacements in axial direction are below 5μm for 62.5 % turbines, in the range 5-8μm for 18.75% turbines and above 8μm for 18.75% turbines. Similarly in radial direction the displacement values are below 5μm for 7.58% turbines, in the range 5-8μm for 17.71% turbines and above 8μm for 11.76% turbines. Measured values of vibration velocity and displacement measured for driving end (DE) bearing of generators connected to different turbines are shown in Fig 1 to Fig 12. Measured values of vibration for DE bearing of generators connected to Francis turbines are below 1.6mm/s for 91.11% of generators, in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for 6.66% and above 2.5mm/s for 2.22% generators. And in axial direction, vibration velocities are below 1.6 mm/s for 85.71% generators, in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for 9.52% and above 2.5mm/s for 4.76% generators. Vibration displacement in radial direction are below 5μm for 79.95% generators, in the range 5-8μm for 1.53% generators and above 8μm for remaining generators. Similarly in axial direction, the vibration displacement values are below 5μm for 88.88% generators, in the range for 5-8μm for 5.55% generators and above 8μm for remaining generators. Measured values of vibration for DE bearing of generators connected to Pelton turbines are below 1.6mm/s for 86.95% of generators, in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for 8.69% and above 2.5mm/s for 4.35% generators. And in axial direction, vibration velocities are below 1.6 mm/s for 95.45% generators, in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for remaining generators. Vibration displacement in radial direction are below 5μm for 68% generators, in the range 5-8μm for 8% generators and above 8μm for 24% generators. Similarly in axial direction, the vibration displacement values are below 5μm for 73.91% generators, in the range for 5-8μm for 13.4% generators and above 8μm for remaining generators. Measured values of vibration for DE bearing of generators connected to Kaplan turbines are below 1.6mm/s for 89.28% of generators, in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for 7.142% and above 2.5mm/s for 3.57% generators. And in axial direction, vibration velocities are below 1.6 mm/s for 92.59% generators, in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for 3.7% and above 2.5mm/s for remaining generators. Vibration displacement in radial direction are below 5μm for 68.42% generators, in the range 5-8μm for 21.5% generators and above 8μm for remaining generators. Similarly in axial direction, the vibration displacement values are below 5μm for 72.22% generators, in the range for 5-8μm for 16.66% generators and above 8μm for remaining generators.

Measured values of vibration velocity and displacement measured for non driving end (NDE) bearing of generators connected to Francis turbines are shown in Fig 13. Measured values of vibration for NDE bearing of generators connected to Francis turbines are below 1.6mm/s for 8% of generators, in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for 12.5% and above 2.5mm/s for 7.5% generators. And in axial direction, vibration velocities are below 1.6 mm/s for 83.33% generators, in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for 13.88% and above 2.5mm/s for 2.77% generators. Vibration displacement in radial direction are below 5μm for 84.44% generators, in the range 5-8μm for 6.66% generators and above 8μm for remaining generators. Similarly in axial direction, the vibration displacement values are below 5μm for 86.36% generators, in the range for 5-8μm for 4.54% generators and above 8μm for remaining generators. Measured values of vibration velocity and displacement measured for non driving end (NDE) bearing of generators connected to Pelton turbines are shown in Fig 14. Measured values of vibration for NDE bearing of generators connected to Pelton turbines are below 1.6mm/s for 95.45% of generators and in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for remaining generators. And in axial direction, vibration velocities are below 1.6 mm/s for 94.44% generators and in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for 5.55% generators. Vibration displacement in radial direction are below 5μm for 69.56% generators, in the range 5-8μm for 8.69% generators and above 8μm for remaining generators. Similarly in axial direction, the vibration displacement values are below 5μm for 77.77% generators, in the range for 5-8μm for 5.55% generators and above 8μm for remaining generators. Measured values of vibration for NDE bearing of generators connected to Kaplan turbines are below 1.6mm/s for 92.59% of generators, in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for 3.7% generators and above 2.5mm/s for remaining generators. And in axial direction, vibration velocities are below 1.6 mm/s for 85.19% generators, in the range 1.6-2.5mm/s for 7.4% generators and above 2.5mm/s for remaining generators. Vibration displacement in radial direction are below 5μm for 68.42% generators, in the range 5-8μm for 1.53% generators and above 8μm for remaining generators. Similarly in axial direction, the vibration displacement values are below 5μm for 61.11% generators, in the range for 5-8μm for 22.22% generators and above 8μm for remaining generators. 5. Noise Level Measurements Sound level is also measured during the performance testing. Noise is one of the most annoying problems with the machine. A maximum sound level up to 85 db is generally desirable and a level of 9 db is considered acceptable. Sound level beyond 9 db causes discomfort to the operation and maintenance (O&M) staff working close to the machine, while a continuous exposure to sound levels above 95 db can seriously affect their working efficiency and even lead to deafness. Sound level is

measured with the help of a sound level meter in weighting factor A mode near the machines at no-load conditions. Readings are taken 1 m away from the surface of generator, turbine, flywheel and gear box (as applicable) at right angle to the machine shaft, both on upstream and downstream sides of the machine [4]. The specification of instrument used for sound level measurement are given in Table 6. Table 6: Instrument used for sound level measurement Make Optel Model db Meter Digital db Meter db-cal Range 3 to 13 db (three positions) 94 and 114 db Accuracy ± 1. db ±.5 db Resolution ±.1 db - Frequency 1 Hz + 2% Output Signal.5 volt rms AC output impedance 6 ohm 94 db and 114 db sound output through audio speaker Table 7 and 8 show the observed values of sound level at upstream and downstream side of different turbines and generators connected to those units in db. Table 7: Sound level near Turbine in db. Location of Measurement Type of Turbine Francis Kaplan Pelton Up side Minimum 81.8 79.7 82.3 Maximum 13.7 1.2 12.3 Down side Minimum 82.1 81.2 81.2 Maximum 14.3 11.2 11.4 Table 8: Sound level Near Generators Connected to Different Turbines in db. Location of Measurement Type of Turbine Francis Kaplan Pelton Up side Minimum 8.4 79.2 88.1 Maximum 14.9 13.6 13.2 Down side Minimum 8.2 8.1 8.5 Maximum 19.6 14.3 14.2 The graphs for sound level observed near turbines and generators with specific speed are shown in Fig. 16 to 18.

16 up stream of turbine up stream of generator down stream of turbine down stream of generator 16 12 12 Sound level in db 98 94 9 86 98 94 9 86 Sound level in db 82 82 78.4.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 78 Figure 16: Sound level data for Francis turbines and generators connected to Francis turbines. Sound level in db 16 14 12 1 98 96 94 92 9 88 86 84 82 up stream of turbine up stream of generator 8.8.17.26 down stream of turbine down stream of generator Figure 17: Sound level data for Pelton turbines and generators connected to Pelton turbines. 16 14 12 1 98 96 94 92 9 88 86 84 82 8 78 Sound level in db

16 up stream of turbine up stream of generator down stream of turbine down stream of generator 16 12 12 Sound level in db 98 94 9 86 98 94 9 86 Sound level in db 82 82 78 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Figure 18: Sound level data for Kaplan turbines and generators connected to Kaplan turbines. Hydro power houses, where sound level near the turbines was observed more than 9 db by IITR, were suggested to the use of ear phones while working in turbine floor. In case of generators, the sound level above 9 db was observed for generally air cooled types. 6. Conclusion There is no trend observed for different turbines with specific speeds for measured values of either vibration or noise. No prediction of abrupt behaviour of the values was observed from the measurement. Working conditions for every plant at each site were different. No correlation was found in the behaviour of machine specific to working condition. This area is open for more detailed investigations and look through for suggestions from experts. 7. Acknowledgement The authors are grateful to Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Govt. of India to initiate and fund the field observations and testing facilities along with the small hydropower station programme for releasing the government subsidy to project developers. The contribution of all other team members namely Prof HK Verma, Prof Vinod Kumar, Prof RP Maheshwari, Prof RP Saini, Dr. Manoj Tripati, Dr. Dilbag Singh and Dr B Majumdar for the field observations taken during the period of 25 215 is sincerely acknowledged. All the staff members of AHEC and other departments of IIT Roorkee who have contributed directly or indirectly are thankfully acknowledged. The cooperation extended by the plant owners is highly appreciated and acknowledged. 78

REFERENCES 1. ISO 1816-5 - 2, Mechanical vibration - Evaluation of machine vibration by measurements non-rotating parts Part 5: Machine sets in hydraulic power generating and pumping plants. P 26, Geneva, April 2. 2. ISO 7919-1 - 1996, Mechanical vibration Evaluation of machine vibration by measurement on rotating shaft Part 1: General guidelines. P 24, Switzerland, July 1996. 3. ISO 7919-5 - 1997, Mechanical vibration Evaluation of machine vibration by measurement on rotating shaft Part 5: Machine sets in hydraulic power generating and pumping plants. P 16, Switzerland February 1997. 4. AHEC-IITR, 1.1 General Performance Evaluation of Small Hydro Power Plants standard/manual/guideline with support from Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Roorkee, Oct. 212. P 69 Web link: www.ahec.org.in/publ/standard/standards_for_small_hydropower_dev.html 5. Samarasekera, H. Sam; Vibration Damping, Control, and Design, Edited by Clarence W. de Silva, CRC Press 27, Pages 1 58,