An Example of Self Acceleration for Incompressible Flows. Key Words: incompressible flows, Euler equation, Navier-Stokes equation, self-acceleration

Similar documents
Week 2 Notes, Math 865, Tanveer

Decay in Time of Incompressible Flows

Euler Equations: local existence

The Navier Stokes Equations for Incompressible Flows: Solution Properties at Potential Blow Up Times

V (r,t) = i ˆ u( x, y,z,t) + ˆ j v( x, y,z,t) + k ˆ w( x, y, z,t)

Week 6 Notes, Math 865, Tanveer

Remarks on the blow-up criterion of the 3D Euler equations

Global regularity of a modified Navier-Stokes equation

Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Elementary Viscous Flow

Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Ideal Flow Theory & Basic Aerodynamics

Bessel Functions Michael Taylor. Lecture Notes for Math 524

Convergence of a Two-parameter Family of Conjugate Gradient Methods with a Fixed Formula of Stepsize

Euler equation and Navier-Stokes equation

F11AE1 1. C = ρν r r. r u z r

UNIVERSITY of LIMERICK

A LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE. 1.

Getting started: CFD notation

THE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n

MATH 332: Vector Analysis Summer 2005 Homework

1 + f 2 x + f 2 y dy dx, where f(x, y) = 2 + 3x + 4y, is

Numerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations

3.5 Vorticity Equation

CONNECTIONS BETWEEN A CONJECTURE OF SCHIFFER S AND INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID MECHANICS

Probing Fundamental Bounds in Hydrodynamics Using Variational Optimization Methods

The Role of Convection and Nearly Singular Behavior of the 3D Navier-Stokes Equations

IMA Preprint Series # 2143

LACK OF HÖLDER REGULARITY OF THE FLOW FOR 2D EULER EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUNDED VORTICITY. 1. Introduction

On Smoothness of Suitable Weak Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations

MAE 101A. Homework 7 - Solutions 3/12/2018

Laplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas

Scientific Computing I

Correction to Blow-up directions at space infinity for solutions of semilinear heat equations BSPM 23 (2005), 9 28.

Math background. Physics. Simulation. Related phenomena. Frontiers in graphics. Rigid fluids

Basic hydrodynamics. David Gurarie. 1 Newtonian fluids: Euler and Navier-Stokes equations

Chapter 2: Fluid Dynamics Review

Blow-up or No Blow-up? the Role of Convection in 3D Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations

3 2 6 Solve the initial value problem u ( t) 3. a- If A has eigenvalues λ =, λ = 1 and corresponding eigenvectors 1

CHEM-UA 127: Advanced General Chemistry I

The Navier-Stokes Equations with Time Delay. Werner Varnhorn. Faculty of Mathematics University of Kassel, Germany

On the p-laplacian and p-fluids

7a3 2. (c) πa 3 (d) πa 3 (e) πa3

Vorticity Equation Marine Hydrodynamics Lecture 9. Return to viscous incompressible flow. N-S equation: v. Now: v = v + = 0 incompressible

Velocities in Quantum Mechanics

Lecture No 1 Introduction to Diffusion equations The heat equat

Lecture 1: Introduction to Linear and Non-Linear Waves

The Inviscid Limit for Non-Smooth Vorticity

THE STOKES SYSTEM R.E. SHOWALTER

Global Maxwellians over All Space and Their Relation to Conserved Quantites of Classical Kinetic Equations

Fourth Order Convergence of Compact Finite Difference Solver for 2D Incompressible Flow

INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUIDS IN THIN DOMAINS WITH NAVIER FRICTION BOUNDARY CONDITIONS (II) Luan Thach Hoang. IMA Preprint Series #2406.

MULTIGRID PRECONDITIONING IN H(div) ON NON-CONVEX POLYGONS* Dedicated to Professor Jim Douglas, Jr. on the occasion of his seventieth birthday.

Variational Assimilation of Discrete Navier-Stokes Equations

McGill University December Intermediate Calculus. Tuesday December 17, 2014 Time: 14:00-17:00

DIRECTION OF VORTICITY AND A REFINED BLOW-UP CRITERION FOR THE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS WITH FRACTIONAL LAPLACIAN

ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE FOR SOLUTIONS OF THE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS. Tian Ma. Shouhong Wang

A Study on Numerical Solution to the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equation

The enigma of the equations of fluid motion: A survey of existence and regularity results

Math Homework 2

1. Prove the following properties satisfied by the gamma function: 4 n n!

VANISHING VISCOSITY IN THE PLANE FOR VORTICITY IN BORDERLINE SPACES OF BESOV TYPE

Partial Differential Equations for Engineering Math 312, Fall 2012

u t + u u = p (1.1) u = 0 (1.2)

Oscillation Criteria for Delay Neutral Difference Equations with Positive and Negative Coefficients. Contents

2.20 Fall 2018 Math Review

ENGI 9420 Lecture Notes 1 - ODEs Page 1.01

arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 16 May 2007

is the ith variable and a i is the unit vector associated with the ith variable. h i

1 The Stokes System. ρ + (ρv) = ρ g(x), and the conservation of momentum has the form. ρ v (λ 1 + µ 1 ) ( v) µ 1 v + p = ρ f(x) in Ω.

A stochastic particle system for the Burgers equation.

Offshore Hydromechanics Module 1

0 = p. 2 x + 2 w. z +ν w

Mathematical Theory of Non-Newtonian Fluid

of some mathematical models in physics

The Central Limit Theorem: More of the Story

Multivariable Calculus

A posteriori regularity of the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations from numerical computations

Mathematics for Physical Sciences III

This note presents an infinite-dimensional family of exact solutions of the incompressible three-dimensional Euler equations

KINEMATICS OF CONTINUA

g(t) = f(x 1 (t),..., x n (t)).

We denote the derivative at x by DF (x) = L. With respect to the standard bases of R n and R m, DF (x) is simply the matrix of partial derivatives,

Applied Analysis (APPM 5440): Final exam 1:30pm 4:00pm, Dec. 14, Closed books.

ON A FAILURE TO EXTEND YUDOVICH S UNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR 2D EULER EQUATIONS

PRACTICE PROBLEMS. Please let me know if you find any mistakes in the text so that i can fix them. 1. Mixed partial derivatives.

On the Uniqueness of Weak Solutions to the 2D Euler Equations

Math 23b Practice Final Summer 2011

GEOMETRICAL TOOLS FOR PDES ON A SURFACE WITH ROTATING SHALLOW WATER EQUATIONS ON A SPHERE

FREE BOUNDARY PROBLEMS IN FLUID MECHANICS

On Global Well-Posedness of the Lagrangian Averaged Euler Equations

Multiple Integrals and Vector Calculus (Oxford Physics) Synopsis and Problem Sets; Hilary 2015

FFTs in Graphics and Vision. Homogenous Polynomials and Irreducible Representations

Weak Convergence Methods for Energy Minimization

In this section, mathematical description of the motion of fluid elements moving in a flow field is

Smarandache Curves In Terms of Sabban Frame of Fixed Pole Curve. Key Words: Smarandache Curves, Sabban Frame, Geodesic Curvature, Fixed Pole Curve

Review for the Final Test

Blow-up or No Blow-up? Fluid Dynamic Perspective of the Clay Millennium Problem

b) The system of ODE s d x = v(x) in U. (2) dt

ESTIMATES OF LOWER ORDER DERIVATIVES OF VISCOUS FLUID FLOW PAST A ROTATING OBSTACLE

arxiv: v2 [math-ph] 14 Apr 2008

Stability of Shear Flow

Transcription:

Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. (3s.) v. 31 2 (213): 149 159. c SPM ISSN-2175-1188 on line ISSN-378712 in press SPM: www.spm.uem.br/bspm doi:1.5269/bspm.v31i2.1738 An Example of Self Acceleration for Incompressible Flows Jens Lorenz and Randy Ott abstract: In this paper we consider the Cauchy problem for the unforced Euler and Navier Stokes equations for incompressible flows. We give an example of a smooth initial velocity field of finite energy which is self accelerating, i.e., the maximal speed increases for some time. The self acceleration is due to the non Bernoulli part of the pressure generated by the velocity field. Key Words: incompressible flows, Euler equation, Navier-Stokes equation, self-acceleration Contents 1 Introduction 149 2 The Acceleration Term 15 3 Example of a Self Accelerating Velocity Field 152 4 Remarks on the Pressure Equation 156 5 Appendix: Some Elementary Integrals 157 1. Introduction Consider the Cauchy problem for the Euler or the Navier Stokes 1 equations: v t +v v + p = ν v, v =, (1.1) v(x,) = u(x), x R 3. (1.2) Here ν = for the Euler equation and ν > for the Navier Stokes equation. We assume that the initial vector field, v(x, ) = u(x), is given by a smooth, bounded, divergence free function u(x) of finite energy. Then a smooth solution v(x, t) is known to exist in some finite time interval t < T. It is an open problem, for both the Euler and the Navier Stokes equations, if blow up can occur in finite time or if a smooth solution v(x,t) always exists for t <. 2 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35Q3, 35Q31, 35Q35, 76D5 1 We consider the equations in nondimensional form with density ρ = 1. 149 Typeset by B S P M style. c Soc. Paran. de Mat.

15 Jens Lorenz and Randy Ott Denote the spatial maximum norm by 2 v(,t) = sup v(x,t). x We will use the following terminology: Definition 1.1 The initial velocity field u = u(x) in (1.2) is self accelerating for equation (1.1) if there is a time t > so that v(,t) > u for < t t. (1.3) We use the term self accelerating since no forcing terms or inhomogeneous boundary conditions are present in the problem. As we will see in the next section, self acceleration at time t =, if it occurs, is due to the pressure term p in (1.1). Here p = p(x) = p(x,) is determined in terms of u by the Poisson equation 3 p = 3 D i D j (u i u j ), p(x) as x. (1.4) i,j=1 Interest in self accelerating flows is motivated by the (open) blow up problem for the Navier Stokes equation. 4 For the Navier Stokes equations, it is known (see, for example, [1] or [2]) that if the maximal interval of existence of a smooth solution v(x,t) is t < t then lim v(,t) t t =. Therefore, if blow up occurs, self acceleration must occur at some time t less than t. What properties do self accelerating flow fields have? In Section 2 we give some simple properties. We could not find any example of a self accelerating flow field with finite energy in the literature. In Section 3 we give an explicit example for the Euler equation. A simple scaling argument then shows how one can obtain an example for the Navier Stokes equation. 2. The Acceleration Term Without loss of generality, we will assume that the maximal speed at time t = occurs at the point x = : 2 With a,b = 3 j=1 a jb j and a = a,a 1/2 we denote the Euclidean inner product and norm on R 3. 3 We denote D j = / x j. 4 This blow up problem is one of the Millennium Problems chosen by the Clay Mathematics Institute. The official description by Charles Fefferman can be found at www.claymath.org/millennium.

An Example of Self Acceleration for Incompressible Flows 151 u() = u. Then, since the function φ(x) = 1 2 u(x) 2 is maximal at x =, we have and = D j φ() = 3 i=1 (u i D j u i ) () (2.5) D 2 jφ() = 3 i=1 (u i D 2 ju i ) ()+ 3 (D j u i ) 2 () (2.6) i=1 for j = 1,2,3. The vector field u(x) is self accelerating if We have, at x =,t = : A := 1 d t= 2dt v(,t) 2 >. (2.7) A = v,v t = v,v v v, p +ν v, v =: C +P +νv (2.8) Here the convection term is (at x =, t = ): C = i,j v j v i D j v i = because of (2.5). The viscous term is (at x =, t = ): V = i,j = j v i D 2 jv i D 2 jφ() i,j (D j u i ) 2 () because of (2.6). Therefore, to obtain a vectorfield u(x) with A > (see (2.7)) it is necessary that the pressure term P in (2.8) satisfies < P = u(), p(). (2.9) The condition (2.9) is also sufficient for self acceleration if ν =, i.e., for the Euler equation. In the next section we will give an example of a velocity field u(x) which has maximal speed at the origin and satisfies (2.9). Thus, this vector field is self accelerating for the Euler equation.

152 Jens Lorenz and Randy Ott 3. Example of a Self Accelerating Velocity Field In this section we use the notation x = (x,y,z) for the space variable. Define the velocity field u := ψ where ψ(x,y,z) = e (x2 +y 2 +z 2 ) 4y x. xy It is clear that u is divergence free and u as well as all its derivatives lie in L 2. Elementary calculations show that x 2xy 2 2xz u(x,y,z) = e (x2 +y 2 +z 2 ) y 8yz +2x 2 y (3.1) 5+2x 2 +8y 2 which yields u() = 5. Furthermore, it is elementary to check that the function φ(x,y,z) = 1 2 u(x,y,z) 2 has a gradient which vanishes at the origin and has a negative definite Hessian at the origin: H = φ () = 138 258. 1 This implies that the speed u(x,y,z) has a local maximum at the origin. A field plot of the velocity is shown in figure 1.

An Example of Self Acceleration for Incompressible Flows 153 Figure 1: A Self-Accelerating Velocity Field In fact, the local maximum is a global maximum as can be verified by numerical computations. See Figure 2.

154 Jens Lorenz and Randy Ott 7 6 5 (1/2)max x =r u(x) 2 4 3 2 1.2.4.6.8 1 r Figure 2: The function max x =r 1 2 u(x) 2 For the above example, the pressure term P (see (2.9)) becomes P = 5 z p(x,y,z) x=y=z= where the pressure p is determined by the Poisson equation (1.4). Let Q(x,y,z) denote the right hand side of (1.4). Then we have P = 5 z p(x,y,z) x=y=z= 5 z = Q(x,y,z) 4π R 3 (x 2 +y 2 +z 2 ) 1/2 = 5 zq(x,y,z) 4π R 3 (x 2 +y 2 +z 2 ) 3/2 =: J Elementary computations, for which we applied Maple, show that the right hand side Q = D i D j (u i u j ) for the above example reads Q(x,y,z) = q(x,y,z)e 2(x2 +y 2 +z 2 )

An Example of Self Acceleration for Incompressible Flows 155 where q is the polynomial ( q(x,y,z) = 2 48x 2 y 2 z +6z +24y 2 z 36x 2 z 32x 2 212y 2 +1+8x 2 z 2 +44x 2 y 2 +128y 2 z 2 +12x 4 +132y 4 +84z 2 +8x 2 y 4 +8x 4 y 2) The first four terms in the formula for q(x,y,z) are antisymmetric in z whereas the remaining terms are symmetric in z. Therefore, noting the factor z in the integrand of the integral J, only the first four terms of q(x,y,z) lead to a non zero contribution in J. One obtains where (see the Appendix) J = J 1 +J 2 +J 3 +J 4 Similarly, J 1 = 5 96 4π = 5 96 4π = 4 7 R3 x 2 y 2 z 2 e 2(x 2 +y 2 +z 2 ) (x 2 +y 2 +z 2 ) 3/2 r 5 e 2r2 dr π cos 2 θsin 5 θdθ 2π sin 2 φcos 2 φdφ Therefore, J 2 = 5 12 4π = 5 J 3 = 5 48 4π = 2 J 4 = 5 72 4π = 3 J = 4 7 R3 z 2 e 2(x 2 +y 2 +z 2 ) (x 2 +y 2 +z 2 ) 3/2 R3 y 2 z 2 e 2(x 2 +y 2 +z 2 ) (x 2 +y 2 +z 2 ) 3/2 R3 x 2 z 2 e 2(x 2 +y 2 +z 2 ) (x 2 +y 2 +z 2 ) 3/2 +5+2 3 = 24 7 >. Lemma 3.1. Let u denote the velocity field (3.1). Then its speed u(x) is maximal at x = and if p is the pressure corresponding to u (see (1.4)) then

156 Jens Lorenz and Randy Ott P = u(), p() = 24 7 >. Therefore, u is self accelerating for the Euler equation. Scaling argument for Navier Stokes. Let λ > denote a scaling parameter and let u denote the velocity field (3.1). We set u λ (x) = λu(x). Then the pressure determined by u λ is p λ = λ 2 p and the term corresponding to P (see (2.9)) is P λ = λ 3 P. If V λ = u λ (), u λ () denotes the viscous term corresponding to u λ (see (2.8)) then V λ = λ 2 V. Therefore, the acceleration term (see (2.8)) corresponding to u λ is A λ = λ 3 P +νλ 2 V. Since P > it follows that A λ > for sufficiently large λ. Theorem 3.1. Let u denote the velocity field (3.1) and let u λ (x) = λu(x). If λ > is large enough, then u λ is self accelerating for the Navier Stokes equation. 4. Remarks on the Pressure Equation If p is the pressure in the Navier Stokes equation then p = (u u) = (D i u j )(D j u i ) = D i D j (u i u j ) =: Q Using the vector identity (F G) = F G+G F +F ( G)+G ( F) with F = G = u and taking the divergence yields (u u) = 1 2 ( u 2 )+ (ω u). Therefore, p = Q = 1 2 ( u 2 )+ (ω u),

An Example of Self Acceleration for Incompressible Flows 157 i.e., (p+ 1 2 u 2 ) = (ω u). If one defines q(x) by q = (ω u), q(x) as x, then p = 1 2 u 2 +q. One may call the Bernoulli part of p and p B = 1 2 u 2 q = p nb the non Bernoulli part of p. (Note that we have nondimensionalized the Navier Stokes equations and assumed the density to be one. In dimensional variables one has p B = ρ 2 u 2 where ρ is density.) The Bernoulli part p B = 1 2 u 2 of p is irrelevant for determining the crucial quantity P (see (2.9)): If the speed u(x) has a maximum at any point x = x, then the gradient of p B is zero at x = x. For the non Bernoulli part q = p nb we have q = (ω u) = u ( ω) ω 2 showing the importance of vorticity for self acceleration. 5. Appendix: Some Elementary Integrals The evaluation of p() leads to integrals of the form J klm = x 2k y 2l z 2m r 3 e 2r 2 R 3 where r 2 = x 2 +y 2 +z 2 and where k, l, m are nonnegative integers with N := k +l+m 1.

158 Jens Lorenz and Randy Ott In spherical coordinates: x = rsinθcosφ y = rsinθsinφ z = rcosθ dv = r 2 sinθdrdθdφ Therefore, J klm = Here r 2N 1 e r2 dr π sin 2k+2l+1 θcos 2m θdθ 2π cos 2k φsin 2l φdφ. In particular, J r (N) = = 1 4 = 1 4 = Γ(N) 2 N+1 r 2N 1 e r2 dr r 2N 2 (4re 2r2 )dr (2r 2 = s,4rdr = ds) (s/2) N 1 e s ds J r (1) = 1 4, J r(2) = J r (3) = 1 8. The angular integrals lead to Euler s Beta function, One obtains B(α,β) = 2 π/2 = Γ(α)Γ(β) Γ(α+β) sin 2α 1 scos 2β 1 sds J θ (k,l,m) = = 2 π sin 2k+2l+1 θcos 2m θdθ π/2 sin 2k+2l+1 θcos 2m θdθ = B(k +l+1,m+ 1 2 )

An Example of Self Acceleration for Incompressible Flows 159 and J φ (k,l) = = 4 2π π/2 sin 2l φcos 2k φdφ sin 2l φcos 2k φdφ = 2B(l+ 1 2,k + 1 2 ) Therefore, J klm = Γ(N) 2 N Γ(k + 1 2 )Γ(l+ 1 2 )Γ(m+ 1 2 ) Γ(N + 3 2 ) where N = k +l+m. In particular, J 1 = 1 π πγ( 3 2 2 ) Γ(1+ 3 2 ) = π 2 2 3 = π 3 J 11 = 1 4 = π 3 πγ( 3 2 )Γ(3 2 ) Γ(2+ 3 2 ) J 111 = 2 8 Γ(3 2 )Γ(3 2 )Γ(3 2 ) Γ(3+ 3 2 ) π = 21 References 1. A. Bertozzi and A. Majda, Vortocity and incompressible flows, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 22. 2. H. O. Kreiss and J. Lorenz, Initial boundary value problems and the Navier Stokes equations, Classics in Applied Mathematics 47, SIAM, 24. Jens Lorenz and Randy Ott Department of Mathematics and Statistics, UNM, Albuquerque, NM 87131