Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Using Soft-Core Interactions to Enhance Conformational Sampling

Similar documents
High Throughput In-Silico Screening Against Flexible Protein Receptors

Exploring the Free Energy Surface of Short Peptides by Using Metadynamics

Modelling of Possible Binding Modes of Caffeic Acid Derivatives to JAK3 Kinase

Modeling the Free Energy of Polypeptides in Different Environments

Aggregation of the Amyloid-β Protein: Monte Carlo Optimization Study

Conformational Studies of UDP-GlcNAc in Environments of Increasing Complexity

Using Simple Fluid Wetting as a Model for Cell Spreading

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Metaloenzyme Thiocyanate Hydrolase with Non-Corrinoid Co(III) in Active Site

Scalable Systems for Computational Biology

An introduction to Molecular Dynamics. EMBO, June 2016

Methods for searching and sampling configurational space

De novo all atom folding of helical proteins

CYP 2D6 Binding Affinity Predictions Using Multiple Ligand and Protein Conformations

Microscopic analysis of protein oxidative damage: effect of. carbonylation on structure, dynamics and aggregability of.

ing equilibrium i Dynamics? simulations on AchE and Implications for Edwin Kamau Protein Science (2008). 17: /29/08

Computational Studies of the Photoreceptor Rhodopsin. Scott E. Feller Wabash College

What makes a good graphene-binding peptide? Adsorption of amino acids and peptides at aqueous graphene interfaces: Electronic Supplementary

Characterizing Structural Transitions of Membrane Transport Proteins at Atomic Detail Mahmoud Moradi

Free energy calculations using molecular dynamics simulations. Anna Johansson

Quantum Mechanical Models of P450 Metabolism to Guide Optimization of Metabolic Stability

ONETEP PB/SA: Application to G-Quadruplex DNA Stability. Danny Cole

Supplemental Information

Computational Modeling of Protein Kinase A and Comparison with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data

Alchemical free energy calculations in OpenMM

Fluorine in Peptide and Protein Engineering

The Molecular Dynamics Method

Structural and mechanistic insight into the substrate. binding from the conformational dynamics in apo. and substrate-bound DapE enzyme

Structure Investigation of Fam20C, a Golgi Casein Kinase

Some Accelerated/Enhanced Sampling Techniques

Computational Science and Engineering Field of Specialisation: Chemistry and Biology. Contact Person: Prof. Philippe Hünenberger

Calculations of binding affinity between C8-substituted GTP analogs and the bacterial cell-division protein FtsZ

Interpreting and evaluating biological NMR in the literature. Worksheet 1

Molecular dynamics simulations of anti-aggregation effect of ibuprofen. Wenling E. Chang, Takako Takeda, E. Prabhu Raman, and Dmitri Klimov

The Chemistry department approved by the American Chemical Society offers a Chemistry degree in the following concentrations:

Supplementary Information

Examples of Protein Modeling. Protein Modeling. Primary Structure. Protein Structure Description. Protein Sequence Sources. Importing Sequences to MOE

Exploring the Changes in the Structure of α-helical Peptides Adsorbed onto Carbon and Boron Nitride based Nanomaterials

Towards Physics-based Models for ADME/Tox. Tyler Day

What is Protein Design?

arxiv: v1 [physics.bio-ph] 26 Nov 2007

BUDE. A General Purpose Molecular Docking Program Using OpenCL. Richard B Sessions

Introduction solution NMR

Protein Structure Prediction

Supplemental Information for: Characterizing the Membrane-Bound State of Cytochrome P450 3A4: Structure, Depth of Insertion and Orientation

Improving Protein Function Prediction with Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Dariya Glazer Russ Altman

) (3) Structure Optimization Combining Soft-Core Interaction Functions, the Diffusion Equation Method, and Molecular Dynamics

CHEM 109A Organic Chemistry

Molecular Modelling for Medicinal Chemistry (F13MMM) Room A36

Conformations of Cycloheptadecane. A Comparison of Methods for Conformational Searching.

Chem. 27 Section 1 Conformational Analysis Week of Feb. 6, TF: Walter E. Kowtoniuk Mallinckrodt 303 Liu Laboratory

Energy Profiles and Chemical Reactions

CHEMISTRY (CHEM) CHEM 5800 Principles Of Materials Chemistry. Tutorial in selected topics in materials chemistry. S/U grading only.

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapy-JPET#172536

Toward an Understanding of GPCR-ligand Interactions. Alexander Heifetz

Biomolecules: lecture 10

Supporting information for: Mechanism of lignin inhibition of enzymatic. biomass deconstruction

Introduction to Computational Structural Biology

Rietveld Structure Refinement of Protein Powder Diffraction Data using GSAS

Free Energy Calculations in Globular Proteins: Methods to Reduce Errors

Supporting Information

Lecture 34 Protein Unfolding Thermodynamics

All-atom Molecular Mechanics. Trent E. Balius AMS 535 / CHE /27/2010

Lecture 2 and 3: Review of forces (ctd.) and elementary statistical mechanics. Contributions to protein stability

Structural Bioinformatics (C3210) Molecular Mechanics

Unfolding CspB by means of biased molecular dynamics

Replica exchange methodology. John Karanicolas June 2003

Exchange Frequencies in 2D Solids: Example of Helium 3 Adsorbed on Graphite and the Wigner Crystal

CONFORMATIONAL SEARCH OF PROTEINS AND PROTEIN LOOPS

Dr. Sander B. Nabuurs. Computational Drug Discovery group Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics Radboud University Medical Centre

Chemical properties that affect binding of enzyme-inhibiting drugs to enzymes

Bioengineering & Bioinformatics Summer Institute, Dept. Computational Biology, University of Pittsburgh, PGH, PA

Supporting Information

Protein Simulations in Confined Environments

Molecular Interactions F14NMI. Lecture 4: worked answers to practice questions

Convergence of replica exchange molecular dynamics

Limitations of temperature replica exchange (T-REMD) for protein folding simulations

Peptide folding in non-aqueous environments investigated with molecular dynamics simulations Soto Becerra, Patricia

Multi-scale approaches in description and design of enzymes

Protein Modeling. Generating, Evaluating and Refining Protein Homology Models

List of publications

Medical Research, Medicinal Chemistry, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Molecular Modelling. part of Bioinformatik von RNA- und Proteinstrukturen. Sonja Prohaska. Leipzig, SS Computational EvoDevo University Leipzig

Supplementary Methods

Lecture 11: Potential Energy Functions

Catalytic Mechanism of the Glycyl Radical Enzyme 4-Hydroxyphenylacetate Decarboxylase from Continuum Electrostatic and QC/MM Calculations

Basic Ingredients of Free Energy Calculations: A Review

A) at equilibrium B) endergonic C) endothermic D) exergonic E) exothermic.

Protein Structure Determination using NMR Spectroscopy. Cesar Trinidad

Biochemistry 462a - Enzyme Kinetics Reading - Chapter 8 Practice problems - Chapter 8: (not yet assigned); Enzymes extra problems

Supporting Information

Introduction to Comparative Protein Modeling. Chapter 4 Part I

Anatoly B. Kolomeisky Department of Chemistry Center for Theoretical Biological Physics How to Understand Molecular Transport through Channels: The

Protein Folding & Stability. Lecture 11: Margaret A. Daugherty. Fall How do we go from an unfolded polypeptide chain to a

N- and S-Oxidation Model of the Flavin-containing MonoOxygenases

Lecture #8 9/21/01 Dr. Hirsh

Structure-based maximal affinity model predicts small-molecule druggability

Receptor Based Drug Design (1)

Overview & Applications. T. Lezon Hands-on Workshop in Computational Biophysics Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center 04 June, 2015

Identifying Interaction Hot Spots with SuperStar

Geometrical Concept-reduction in conformational space.and his Φ-ψ Map. G. N. Ramachandran

Transcription:

John von Neumann Institute for Computing Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Using Soft-Core Interactions to Enhance Conformational Sampling J. Hritz, Ch. Oostenbrink published in From Computational Biophysics to Systems Biology (CBSB08), Proceedings of the NIC Workshop 2008, Ulrich H. E. Hansmann, Jan H. Meinke, Sandipan Mohanty, Walter Nadler, Olav Zimmermann (Editors), John von Neumann Institute for Computing, Jülich, NIC Series, Vol. 40, ISBN 978-3-9810843-6-8, pp. 237-240, 2008. c 2008 by John von Neumann Institute for Computing Permission to make digital or hard copies of portions of this work for personal or classroom use is granted provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise requires prior specific permission by the publisher mentioned above. http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic-series/volume40

Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Using Soft-Core Interactions to Enhance Conformational Sampling Jozef Hritz and Chris Oostenbrink Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research (LACDR), Division of Molecular Toxicology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam NL-1081 HV, The Netherlands E-mail: {hritz, c.oostenbrink}@few.vu.nl We present a novel Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics (H-REMD) scheme that uses soft-core interactions between those parts of the system that contribute most to high energy barriers. The advantage of this approach over other REMD schemes is the possibility to use a relatively small number of replicas with locally larger differences between the individual Hamiltonians. Because soft-core potentials are almost the same as regular ones at longer distances, most of the interactions between atoms of perturbed parts will only be slightly changed. Rather, the strong repulsion between atoms that are close in space, which is in most cases resulting in high energy barriers, is weakened within higher replicas of our proposed scheme. The presented approach leads to a significant enhancement of conformational sampling both for the smaller molecules GTP and 8-Br-GTP in explicit water and for residue Phe483 within the catalytic site of CYP2D6 in complex with its substrate MAMC. 1 Introduction Replica exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) has shown a tremendous impact in the field of biomolecular simulation. While temperature REMD (T-REMD) is mostly used to enhance conformational sampling of larger systems in implicit solvent, Hamiltonian REMD (H-REMD) is also suitable for simulations in explicit solvent. However, it is not always trivial to find a perturbation of the Hamiltonian which leads to enhanced conformatioinal sampling. Here we present a H-REMD scheme using soft-core interactions 1 which is particularly suitable for the enhanced sampling of selected flexible parts of systems in which the energy barrier between different conformations is high due to strong non-bonded repulsions. The barriers are lowered by weakening the interactions using soft-core interactions given by eq. (1): 2 ( V LJ = C12 αc12/c6λ 2 + r 6 C6 ) 1 αc12/c6λ 2 + r 6 (1) All simulations were performed using GROMOS05 3 and the GROMOS 53A6 force field.the REMD efficiency was significantly increased by allowing multiple replicas to run at the highest softness level. Values of other softness levels were optimized by mimicked REMD to maximize the number of global conformational transitions. 4 2 REMD of GTP and 8-Br-GTP We have tested the new protocol on the GTP and 8-Br-GTP molecules in explicit solvent, which are known to have high energy barriers between the anti and syn conformation of the 237

Figure 1. Potential of mean force along the glycosidic bond of GTP, as function of the softness parameter λ. base with respect to the sugar moiety. During two 25 ns MD simulations of both systems the transition from the more stable to the less stable (but still experimentally observed) conformation is not seen at all. Also T-REMD over 50 replicas for 1 ns did not show any transition at room temperature. On the other hand, more than 20 of such transitions are observed in our new H-REMD scheme using 6 replicas (at 3 different Hamiltonians) during 6.8 ns per replica for GTP and 12 replicas (at 6 different Hamiltonians) during 7.7 ns per replica for 8-Br-GTP. The soft-core interactions were applied for the non-bonded base-sugar interactions in GTP and 8-Br-GTP. The calculated population of GTP in the anti conformation was 95.6% ± 0.5% and 6.0% ± 1.8 % for 8-Br-GTP. 1 These values are in very good agreement with results coming from thermodynamic integration using a hidden dihedral angle restraint around the glycosidic bond. The observed inverse character for GTP and 8-Br-GTP is also in agreement with NMR estimates for anti/syn populations. Dihedral angle distributions around the glycosidic bond were also used to generate the potential of mean force (Fig. 1). From this figure it can be seen that the energy barrier as well as the free energy difference between the anti and syn conformation is decreasing with increasing softness. This leads to an increased number of conformational transitions at these levels of softness. 3 REMD of Phe483 within CYP2D6 Cytochromes P450 (CYPs) are heme-containing enzymes that can be found in virtually all organisms. CYP2D6 is one of the most crucial isoforms involved in the drug metabolism of humans. Mutagenesis experiments confirm importance of Phe483 in substrate binding. Its conformation is however quite unclear as it is positioned in a rather flexible loop region inside the catalytic site of CYP2D6. Several computational studies indicate that multiple Phe483 sidechain conformations are occuring. 10 ns of CYP2D6 MD simulations in complex with several ligands revealed only very few transitions for Phe483 between conformations corresponding to χ 1 = 70 and χ 1 = 170. Visual inspection indicates 238

that the corresponding energy barrier is mostly due to the repulsion between the Phe483 and Leu224 side-chains together with the dihedral angle term around χ 1. Therefore enhanced conformational sampling by H-REMD using soft-core interactions was performed for Phe483 within CYP2D6 in complex with the MAMC substrate in which the force constant for the χ 1 dihedral angle term was additionally decreased towards zero with increasing softness. When softness was applied only for the interactions between the sidechains of Phe483 and Leu224 no enhanced sampling was observed. Rather, the sidechains moved closer in space and a high energy barrier remained. On the other hand, when softness was applied for all interactions involving the Phe483 sidechain and the rest of the protein or MAMC, the barrier was significantly lowered. We observed 9 global conformational transitions within 1 ns of H-REMD using 8 replicas. These preliminary (not fully converged) simulations reveal that the conformation of Phe483 with χ 1 = 70, as it is observed in the (apo) crystal structure is present for only 15% of the time when MAMC is bound in the active site. Interestingly, χ 1 had value 170 in the homology model of CYP2D6 in complex with the codein, which was constructed in our group before crystal structure was released. 4 Concluding Remarks We have developed a H-REMD scheme using soft-core interactions 1 and implemented it into the GROMOS05 package. Its high conformational sampling efficiency is shown for GTP and 8-Br-GTP as well as for Phe483 within the CYP2D6/MAMC complex. The high efficiency is obtained thanks to the fact that only those parts of the Hamiltonian are perturbed which contribute most to high energy barriers. Another efficiency gain was obtained by using a degenerate highest softness level and the optimal H-REMD settings obtained from optimization by REMD mimicking. 4 Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, VENI Grant No. 700.55.401. References 1. J. Hritz, and C. Oostenbrink, Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Using Soft-Core Interactions, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 144121, 2008. 2. T. C. Beutler, A. E. Mark, R. C. van Schaik, P. R. Gerber, and W. F. van Gunsteren, Avoiding singularities and numerical instabilities in free-energy calculations based on molecular simulations, Chem. Phys. Lett. 222, 529-539, 1994. 3. M. Christen, P. H. Hunenberger, D. Bakowies, R. Baron, R. Burgi, D. P. Geerke, T. N. Heinz, M. A. Kastenholz, V. Krautler, C. Oostenbrink, C. Peter, D. Trzesniak, and W. F. van Gunsteren, The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05, J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1719-1751, 2005. 4. J. Hritz, and C. Oostenbrink, Optimization of Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics by Fast Mimicking, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 204104, 2007. 239